You are on page 1of 19

THE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER

GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK


SOWK 4971: Social Work and Information and Communication Technologies
3 credit hours

Professor Walter LaMendola, PhD Spring Quarter 2007

(303) 871-2796 wlamendo@du.edu Craig 477, Office Hours: 11-12 Tues

COURSE SYLLABUS

I COURSE DESCRIPTION AND RATIONALE

Information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use has increased at an
astonishing rate over the past decade. Social workers now use and encounter information
and communication technologies in their professional practice regardless of setting or
population served. These technologies range from the telephone to the video play station.
Despite their proliferation, they are often driven by values that do not consider social work
values of importance – and social workers are not well prepared to deal with the context and
consequence of ICT technologies.

Social workers – unlike some other professions – must not only use ICT as tools, but they
must also exercise a professional responsibility to judge technologies and their application
and question whether or not they promote effective human services, social and economic
justice, a good quality of life, and a multicultural community. Presently it is rare that a
social worker develops or produces ICT applications to alleviate and prevent social
problems affecting individuals, families and communities – though that may soon change.
But whether or not they produce such applications, social workers can be prepared to
influence or encourage ICT applications that support the social work code of ethics.

This course is intended for students in advanced clinical (work with individuals, couples and
families) or community practice (work in administration, community organizing and
development, policy analysis and advocacy) who are interested in the effective use of these
technologies and in developing critical skills that allow them to question, critique, and/or
influence the development of communication and information technology applications. The
course is designed as primarily an experiential course, but also as one that provides the
student with a background in the history, use, and application of ICT in the social work
profession.
In summary, the course will focus on social workers as users of technology and as
questioners of technology. The dual focus will examine communication and information
technologies using a tool metaphor, but extending that metaphor to expose the production of
cultural artifacts that have ethical consequence and that profoundly influence social
development while transmitting social value.

III EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES


This course intends to prepare students to

• Increase their familiarity with ICT applications in use in social work and how they are
constructed
• Understand the potential of ICT in social work
• Judge whether populations of interest to social work are or can be empowered via
technological innovations
• Survey the present landscape of communication and information technology
applications, primarily on the Internet, that are specifically related to professional social
work, such as:
Social work knowledge bases
Social work agencies
Social work interventions
Social advocacy
Social work education and training
Ethics
Diversity
Digital divide
Cyber abuse
Cyber counseling/therapy
• Learn how social work practice skills are presently applied in interactive ICT
applications.
• Learn higher level (ICT) skills for advanced social work practice, including use of newer
tools, such as blogging, podcasting, learning management systems, and wikis.

IV READINGS
Required: B. J. Fogg. (2003) Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What
We Think and Do (This book is also available as an electronic resource through Penrose
Library)

V METHODS OF TEACHING
This course utilizes a combination of experiential learning techniques, including
individual investigation, electronic presentations, projects of various types, and
exploration of electronic materials. In addition, there are exercises, discussions, readings
and facilitation by the instructor.

2
VI CONTENT ON SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Throughout this entire course, we will be examining content of historically oppressed
populations including ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion/spiritual beliefs,
socioeconomic status, language, differing abilities, geography, and developmental stages. These
topics are crucial to social workers. Each student should be prepared to examine her or his own
feelings regarding the above material.

VII COURSE OUTLINE


First session Brief overview of course.
Experiential Examination of the Pew Internet & American Life Project
Exploring persuasion on the Web
Finding persuaders of interest to social work
Setting up student ICT resources
Readings: Fogg. Preface, Introduction, Chapter 1, pp. ix-22.

Second session The Functional Triad


Assignment #1 due: identify ICT in use in field agency
Experiential: Examples on the Web
Computers as tools – increase capabilities
Computers as medium – provide experiences
Computers as agents – create relationships
Review student ICT resources
Putting field ICT into the functional triad.
Sorting through field ICT pieces and pick focus for wiki
Reading: Fogg Chapter 2, pp23-29
Suggested
Falk, D., (2004). Selected websites for high-to-low end NPO website development.
Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 81-88. Available through
university e-journals.
Freddolino, P. (2003). Agency utilization of free Internet web sites. Journal of
Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(1), 67-73. Available through university e-
journals.

Third session Computers as Persuasive Tools


Assignment #2 due: Find computer products on Web to explore wiki social work
practice focus. Link and describe them on wiki.
Experiential: Reduction: persuading through simplifying
Tunneling: persuading by guiding
Tailoring: persuading by individualizing
Suggestion: persuading at the learning moment
Self-monitoring: persuading by tracking
Surveillance: persuading through observation
Conditioning: persuading through reinforcement
Blog setup, wiki links , set up feeds
Reading: Fogg Chapter 3, pp31-59

3
Fourth session: Computers as Medium
Assignment #3 due: Use second life: report experience on wiki.
Experiential Cause and effect experiences
Simulated environments
Simulated objects
Reading: Fogg Chapter 4, pp 61-87
A Bill of Rights for the Information Age (Glastonbury and LaMendola, 1992) at
http://www.du.edu/~wlamendo/techumanity/techumanity.html
Suggested
Review Wikipedia entry “World Summit on the Information Society”
http://webxact.watchfire.com/ A site to test web sites for accessibility.
Bricout, J. (2001). Making computer-mediated education responsive to the
accommodation needs of students with disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education,
Vol. 37, No.2 (Spring/Summer 2001), 267-281. Available through university e-journals.

Fifth session: Computers as Social Actors


Assignment #4 due: Use rethos.com, neopets.com: report experience on wiki.
Experiential Persuasion using cues
Persuading using language
Persuading using social dynamics
Persuading using social roles
Reading: Fogg Chapter 5, pp 89-120

Sixth session: Mid course evaluation


Assignment #5 due: Review student projects from Netherlands. Comment on each on
wiki.
Experiential Computer credibility
Credibility types
Consolidation of materials: student critique of course wikis and blogs.
mid-course evaluation by students
students discuss individualized project
Reading: Fogg Chapter 6, pp 121-145

Seventh session: Cyberabuse


Assignment #6 due: Review the rippleeffects.com and true.com websites: report
assessments on wiki using web credibility grid
Experiential Web credibility
Credibility studies
Trustworthiness and the Web
The Web Credibility Framework
The Web Credibility Grid
Review of major areas of cyberabuse of interest to social work
student work on individualized projects
Reading: Fogg Chapter 7, pp 147-181
Suggested

4
Finn, J., Kerman, B. (2004). Internet risks for foster families online. Journal of Technology in
Human Services, 22 (4), 21-38. Available through university e-journals.
Spence-Diehl, E. (2003). Stalking and technology: The double-edged sword. Journal of
Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(1), 5-18. Available through university e-journals.

Eighth session Social work ICT with mobility and connectivity


Assignment #7 due: Review ning.com, tribe.net, cyberbullying.us. Report on wiki
Experiential Persuasion through mobile technology
Persuasion through connected technology
student work on individualized projects
Reading: Fogg Chapter 8, pp 183-210

Ninth session Social work ethics & the ethics of persuasive technology
Assignment#8 due: Go to the Mayo clinic depression assessment Website. Assess the
website from a social work ethical standpoint
Experiential Is persuasion unethical?
Ethical concerns
Examining intentions, methods, and outcomes
Use with vulnerable groups
Stakeholder analysis
student work on individualized projects
Reading: Fogg Chapter 9, pp 211-239

Session ten Looking Forward


Assignment #9 due students construct a social work ICT vision statement, comment on
the fit with each of the future trends in captology, and put it in their wiki/blog.
Experiential Students present individualized projects
Course discussion
Course evaluation
Reading: Fogg Chapter 10, pp 241-253

VIII EVALUATION OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE


Each weekly assignment will contribute a maximum of 10 points toward the final grade. The
individualized project will contribute a maximum of 10 points toward the final grade. The
individualized project is a creative task asking that the student imagine and describe a
persuasive computing product that motivates behavior change

5
Assessment Classification Range Grade Grade Point
Excellent Work 94-100 A 4.0
(above course expectations) 91-93 A- 3.7
88-90 B+ 3.3
Good Work
84-87 B 3.0
(meets course expectations)
81-83 B- 2.7
78-80 C+ 2.3
Poor Work
74-77 C 2.0
(meets minimal course expectations)
71-73 C- 1.7
Failing Work 70-0 F 0.0
Incomplete* ( I )
*will only be given in accordance with the policies in the Student Manual

IX POLICY CONCERNING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

If you have a disability protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and need to request accommodations, please make
an appointment with the Disability Services Program (DSP); 303-871-2372, located in
Driscoll South, Suite 30. The Handbook for Students with Disabilities is available online
at http://www.du.edu/disability and is also available from Carole Fee Ivanoff, Director
of Student Services for GSSW students. Once documentation has been received by DSP
and the accommodation(s) afforded, please meet with your instructors as early in the
quarter as possible to discuss how the accommodation(s) will be implemented and how
your needs can be appropriately met.

X POLICY CONCERNING ACADEMIC INTEGRITY & ETHICAL CONDUCT

Students taking this course are expected to adhere to the NASW Code of Ethics, the
GSSW Ethical Behavior and Conduct statement in the student handbook, and the rules
regarding Academic Dishonesty, also found in the student handbook. Students are
expected to demonstrate professional behavior at all times, showing respect to peers,
instructors, and diverse points of view. The University of Denver Honor Code defines
plagiarism as representation of another's work or ideas as one's own and fabrication as
falsification or creation of data, research or resources to support academic submission.
Both are academically dishonest and grounds for disciplinary action.

6
XI SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abels, P. (1972). Can computers do social work? Social Work, 17, No.5.

Ainbinder, A. (2006) Coping in the Context of Poverty (Unpublished dissertation)

Anderson, P., Jacobs, C., Rothbaum, B. (2004). Computer-supported cognitive-behavioral


treatment of anxiety disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(3), 331-345.

Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V. (1998). Technical and methodological issues in WWW surveys.
Available: http://www.ris.org/ris98/stlouis/index.html (2000, November)

Beck, C. T. . (2005) . Benefits of participating in Internet interviews: Women


helping women . Qualitative Health Research, 15, 3, pp. 411-422.

Badagliacco, J. (1990). Gender and race differences in computing attitudes and


experiences. Social Science Computer Review, 8, 42-63.

Becnel, J. M., Ray, S., Wolf, T. M., Lotten, T., & Williams, J. Jr. (1998). The New Orleans
Patient Tracking System (PTS): data management for a network of community-based
alcohol and drug treatment providers. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3-4), 73-98.

Berghoef, M. (2004). Website design and consultant choice resources. Journal of


Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 89-96.

Bloom, M., Fischer, J., Orme, J. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the
accountable professional. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bloom, J., Walz, G. (Eds.) (2000). Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and
resources for the Millenium. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

Bloom, J. (1998). The ethical practice of Web Counseling. British Journal of Guidance &
Counselling, Vol. 26, No. 1, 53-59.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000) How People Learn: Brain,
Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Committee on Developments in the
Science of Learning with additional materials from the Committee on Learning Research
and Educational Practice, M. Suzanne Donovan, John D. Bransford, and James W.
Pellegrino (Eds). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education of the
National Research Council, National Academy Press, Electronic Version available from
Penrose

Bricout, J. (2001). Making computer-mediated education responsive to the accommodation


needs of students with disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education, Vol.37, No. 2
(Spring/Summer), 267-281.

7
Bronson, D.E., Pelz, D., Trzcinski, E., (1988). Computerizing your agency’s information
system. NJ: Sage Publications.

Brown, T. G., J. Topp, & D. Ross. (2003). Rationales, obstacles and strategies for local
outcome monitoring systems in substance abuse treatment settings. Journal of Substance
Abuse Treatment, 24, 31-42.

Butterfield, W. (1998). Human services and the information economy. Computers in


Human Services, 15 (2/3), 121-143.

Cahill, M. (1993). Computer technology and the human services in the 90s: Advancing
theory and practice. Computers in Human Services, Vol.9, No.3/4.

Canada, K., Brusca, F. (1991). The technological gender gap: Evidence and
recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Educational
Technology Research & Development, Vol.39, Number 2.

Caputo, R. (1988). Management and information systems in human services. New York:
Haworth Press.

Carillo, T., Kasser, J., and Moretto, A. (1985). Management information systems: Who is in
charge? Social Casework, 417-423.

Cavanagh, K., Shapiro, D. (2004). Computer treatment for common mental health
problems. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(3), 239-251.

Cnaan, R., Parsloe, P. (Eds.) (1989). The impact of information technology on social work
practice. New York: Haworth Press.

Coe, J., Menon, G. (Eds.) (2000). Computers and Information Technology in Social Work:
Education, Training, and Practice. NY: Haworth.

Cohen, G. E. & Kerr, B. A. (1998). Computer-mediated counseling: an empirical study of a


new mental health treatment. Computers in Human Services, 15(4), 13-26.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on
learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.

Collie, K.R., Mitchell, D., Murphy, L. (2000). Skills for online counseling: Maximum
impact on minimum bandwidth. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.

Cordero, A. (1991). Computers and community organizing: Issues and examples from New
York City. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1.

8
Davidson, T. & Davidson, J.R. (1995). Cost-containment, computers and confidentiality.
Clinical Social Work Journal, 23 (4), 453-464.

Davidovich, U.(2005) Challenges in conducting longitudinal randomized controlled trials


online - The story of evaluating an online tailored HIV-prevention intervention. General
Online Research Conference. German Society for Online Research. Zurich, Switzerland,
March 22-23.

DeMuth, P. (1984). Eliza and her offspring. Using computers in clinical practice. New
York: Haworth.

Dombrowski, S., LeMasney, J., Ahia, C., Dickson, S. (2004). Protecting children from
online sexual predators: Technological, psychoeducational and legal considerations.
Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, Vol. 35(1), 65-73.

Eastman, B. (1991). Women, computers and social change. Computers in Human Services,
Vol.8, No.1.

Evans, J.R. and Anil Mathur.(2005) The Value of On-line Surveys. Internet Research
15(2), pp. 195-219.

Falk, D., (2004). Selected websites for high-to-low end NPO website development. Journal
of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 81-88.

Figley, C. (Ed.) (1985). Computers and family therapy. New York: Haworth Press

Finnegan, D.J. (1996). Unraveling social workers’ ambivalence toward computer


technology: an analysis of the attitudes of social work students towards computers and
social work practice. Computers in Human Services, 13 (2), 33-49.

Freddolino, P. (2003). Agency utilization of free Internet web sites. New Technology in the
Human Services. Vol. 22, 67-73.

Friedrich-Freksa, M., Liebelt, M. (2005). From short message service (SMS) -


questionnaires to mobile Internet surveys: Integrating the mobile phone into market
research . General Online Research Conference. German Society for Online Research.
Zurich, Switzerland, March 22-23.

Fuchs, M.(2006) Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Mobile Phone Surveys. 2nd
International Conference on Telephone Survey Methodology. American Statistical
Association. Miami,Florida: January 2006.

Galinsky, M. J., Schopler, J. H., & Abell, M. D. (1997). Connecting group members
through telephone and computer groups. Health & Social Work, 22 (3), 181-
188.

9
Gandy, J, Tepperman, L. (1990). False alarms: Conclusions and implications. In Gandy, J.,
Tepperman, L. False alarm. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier Press.

Geiss, G., and Viswanathan, N. (Eds.) (1986). The human edge. New York: Haworth
Press.Services. Vol. 22, 67-73.

Gelman, S. R., Pollack, D., & Weiner, A. (1999). Confidentiality of social work records in
the computer age. Social Work, 44 (3), 243-252.

Gerson, R. (1985). Teaching systems psychotherapy with microcomputers: A creative


approach. In Figley, C.R. (Ed.) Computers in family therapy. New York: Haworth.

Giffords, E. (1998). Social work on the Internet: an introduction. Social Work, 43 (3), 243-
251.

Glastonbury, B., and LaMendola, W. (1992). The integrity of intelligence: A bill of rights
for the Information age. NY: St. Martin’s Press.

Glastonbury, B., LaMendola, W., Toole, S. (Eds.) (1988). Information technology and the
human services. Chichester, ENG: John Wiley & Sons.

Glastonbury, B. (1985). Computers in social work. London, ENG: MacMillan Publishers.

Goldman, B.A. (1991). The environment and community right to know: Information for
participation. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1.

Grant, G., & Grobman, L. (1998). The social worker’s internet handbook. PA: White Hat
Communications.

Grigorian, K. H., Sederstrom, S.(2005) Qualitative Comparison of Paper and Online Self-
Administered Modes. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR)
60th Annual Conference, Miami Beach: May 12-15.

Graziani, P., Burzagli, L. (1999). Experience of an electronic newspaper service for the
blind. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 12, Nos. 1 and 2, 26-32.

Gripton, J., Licker, P., deGroot, L. (1986). Applying computers to clinical social work.
Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol.13, No. 1, March.

Grishman, M.H. (1995). Development of a computer information management system.


Social Work in Health Care, 22 (2), 73-86.

Hick, S., McNutt, J. (Eds.) (2002). Advocacy, activism and the Internet. Chicago, ILL:
Lyceum Books, Inc.

10
Hile, M. G. (1998). The history and function of the target cities management information
systems: an introduction to the special issue. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3/4), 1-8.

Howard, M.D. (1995). From oral tradition to computerization: A case study of a social
work department. Computers in Human Services, 12 (3-4), 203-219.

Huang H. and S. Liaw.(2005) Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a
survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior 21(5) September pp. 729-743.
Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., Reips, U. (2005) Personalization, authentication and self-
disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys. General Online Research Conference.
German Society for Online Research. Zurich, Switzerland, March 22-23.

Jamieson, D. (1996). NPO webmaster. Toronto: Hilborn Interactive, Inc.

Kanani, K., Regehr, C. (2003). Clinical, ethical, and legal issues in e-therapy. Families in
Society, 84, 2, 155-162.

Kardas, E.P., Milford, T. (1996). Using the Internet for social science research and
practice. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Karon, P. (1996). Client/server system helps find homes for special kids. InfoWorld, 18 (3),
60.

Kava, Sharon E. and Walter F. LaMendola. “Potential Uses of Telecommunications in


Rural Hospital Social Work: An American Analysis,” Computer Applications in Social
Work and the Allied Professions. Vol. 3, No. 3, Spring 1987.

Kaye, R. A., Stephens, R. C., Chen, H. T. & Bruno, W. J. (1998). Development and use of
information systems in the Cleveland Target Cities Demonstration project. Computers in
Human Services, 14 (3/4), 9-28.

Kenwright, M., Liness, S., Marks, I. (2001). Reducing demands on clinicians by offering
computer-aided self-help for phobia/panic: Feasibility study. British Journal of Psychiatry,
Volume 79, 456-459.

Kiernan, N. E., Kiernan, M., Oyler, M. A., Gilles, C.(2005) Is a Web survey as effective as a
mail survey? A field experiment among computer users. American Journal of Evaluation,
26, 2, pp. 245-252.

King, S., Engi, S., Poulos, S. (1998). Using the Internet to assist family therapy. British
Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No. 1, 43-52.

Khan, B.H. (Ed.) (1997). Web-Based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational
Technology Publications, Incorporated.

11
Knudsen, H. K. P. M. R. (2004). Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment
organizations: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26,
51-59.

LaMendola, Walter, Bryan Glastonbury & Victor Savtschenko. “A Bill of Rights


Approach to the Socially Sustainable Development of an Information Society.” HUSITA 7
Conference, Hong Kong, August 26, 2004.

LaMendola, Walter & Bryan Glastonbury. “Critique of the United Nations World Summit
on the Information Society Draft Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action.” Expert
Meeting, Maiden Bradley, England, June , 2003. Retrieved 26 June 2003
http:\\www.stakes.fi.

LaMendola, Walter F. “Telemental Health Services in US Frontier Areas” Journal of the


Washington Academy of Sciences Volume 86, Number 3, December 2000.

LaMendola, Walter F. “Telemental Health Services in US Frontier Areas: Provider and


Consumer Perspectives” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences Volume 86,
Number 3, December 2000.

LaMendola, Walter F. “Consumer and Service Provider Reactions to Telemental Health


Services: Letter to the Field No. 12.” Frontier Mental Health Services Resource Network,
Denver, Colorado, December 22, 1998.

LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. A Casebook of Computer
Applications in Health and Social Services. New York, Haworth Press. 1989.

LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. “A Casebook of Computer
Applications in Health and Social Services: Part Two”, Computers in Human Services,
Volume 4, Numbers 3, 4, 1989.

LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. “A Casebook of Computer
Applications in Health and Social Services: Part One”, Computers in Human Services,
Volume 4, Numbers 1,2, 1989.

LaMendola, Walter F. Distance Learning in Glastonbury B., LaMendola, Walter F., and
Stuart Toole, eds. Information Technology & The Human Services. London, John Wiley.
1988.

LaMendola, Walter F. Network & Electronic Communications in Glastonbury, B.,


LaMendola, Walter F., and Stuart Toole, eds. Information Technology & The Human
Services. London, John Wiley. 1988.

LaMendola, Walter F. “Teaching Information Technology To Social Workers,” Journal of


Teaching In Social Work. Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring/Summer 1987.

12
LaMendola, Walter F., “Software Development in the USA,” Computer Applications in
Social Work and the Allied Professions. Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring, 1986.

LaMendola, Walter F. “The Future of Human Service Information Technology: An Essay


on the Number 42,” Computers in Human Services. Vol. l, No. l, January 1985.

LaMendola, Walter F. Summary: Information Technology Applied to Facilitating Social


Work Practice Chapter 5 in Gunther Geiss and Narayan Visiwanathan, eds. The Human
Edge: Information Technology and Helping People. New York: Haworth Press, 1985.

LaMendola, Walter F. “Feasibility as a Consideration in Small Computer Selection,”


Administration in Social Work, 5 (3, 4), Winter 1981.

LaMendola, Walter F. Some Effects of Microcomputer-Based Information Systems in


Human Service Organizations, in G. E. Lasker, ed., Applied Systems and Cybernetics, Vol.
3. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981.

LaMendola, Walter F. “A Personal Computer-Based Human Service Organization


Information System,” National Computer Conference Personal Computer Proceedings.
New York: American Federation of Information Processing Societies, 1979.

Lange, A., Schrieken, J. van de Ven, J., Bredeweg, B., Emmelkamp, P. (2000). ‘Interapy’:
The effects of a short protocolled treatment of posttraumatic stress and pathological grief
through the Internet. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28, 175-192.

Leonardi, P. M. (2003). Problematizing "new media": Culturally based perceptions of cell


phones and computers among United States Latinos. Critical Studies in Media
Communication, 20(2), 160-179.

Leung, P., Cheung, K., Stevenson, K. (1994). Advancing competent social work practice: A
computer-based approach to child protective service training. Computers in Human
Services, Vol.11, No.3/4.

Levenson, D. (1997). Online counseling: Opportunity and risk. NASW News, September,
p.3.

Lidsky, D., Kwon, R. (1997). Searching the net. PC Magazine, December 2nd, 227-258.

Link, M. W., Mokdad, A. (2005) Alternative Modes for Health Surveillance Surveys: An
Experiment with Web, Mail, and Telephone. Epidemiology, 16, 5, pp. 701-704.

Linn, N. A., Schneider, S. J., McCreery, R. & Kasab, D. S. (1998). Expert system for
utilization of alcohol and drug abuse cases. Computers in Human Services, 15 (4), 1-12.

13
Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. E. (1985). The reliability and validity of instruments for the
assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 903–
908.

Luce, K. H., Winzelberg, A. J., Das, S., Osborne, M. I., Bryson, S. W., Taylor, C. B. (2006)
Reliability of self-report: paper versus online administration. Computers in Human
Behaviour (in press).

Mangunkusumo R., P. W. Moorman, A. E. Van Den Berg-de Ruiter, J. Van Der Lei, H.J.
De Koning, H. Raat. (2005) Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires
compared with a paper version in a randomized study. Journal of Adolescent Health 36 (1)
January, Page 70.

MacFadden, R. (2005). Souls on Ice: Incorporating Emotion in Web-based Education. In


MacFadden, R. J., Moore, B., Herie, M., Schoech, D. (Eds.). Web-Based Education in
Human Services: Models, Methods and Best Practices. NY: Haworth.

MacFadden, R. J. (2005). Information Technology. In F. Turner (Ed.). Canadian


Encyclopedia of Social Work. Waterloo, ONT: Wilfred Laurier Press.

MacFadden, R.J. (2002). Teaching online. Journal of Technology in Human Services.


Volume 19, Number 1, 72-75.

MacFadden, R. J., Maiter, S., Dumbrill, G. (2002). High tech and high touch: The human
face of online education. In Resnick, H., Anderson, P. (Eds.). Human services technology:
Innovations in practice and education. NY:Haworth Press, 283-300.

MacFadden, R.J. (2000). Billy breaks the rules. Journal of Technology in Human Services,
Vol.17 (4), 53-58.

MacFadden, R.J., Dumbrill, G., Maiter, S. (2000). Web-based education in a graduate


faculty of Social Work: Crossing the new frontier. New Technology in the Human Services,
Vol. 13, No. 1/2, 27-38.

McCabe, S. E., C. J. Boyd, A. Young, S. Crawford, D. Pope (2005) Mode effects for
collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: A randomized pilot
study of Web-form versus paper-form surveys. Addictive Behaviors (30)4, pp. 663-671.

Marlowe-Carr, L. C. (1997). Social workers on-line: a profile. Computers in


Human Services, 14 (1), 59-70.

Marson, S. (1997). A selective history of Internet technology and social work. Computers in
Human Services, 14 (2), 35-49.

Martin, John, Walter LaMendola and David Price. “Developing Web based Internet
Services for Criminal Justice Systems,” Judges Journal, Volume 24, Number 2, 1993.

14
Martinez-Brawley, E.E. (1995). Knowledge diffusion and transfer of technology:
Conceptual premises and concrete steps for human services innovators. Social Work, 40
(5), 670-682.

McCready, D. J., Pierce, S., Rahn, S. L., & Were, K. (1996). Third generation information
systems: integrating costs and outcomes. Tools for professional development and program
evaluation. Administration in Social Work, 20 (1), 1-15.

Miesenberger, K. (2002). Computers helping people with special needs. NY: Sprinter-
Verlag.

Miller, D. B. & DiGiuseppe, D. (1998). Fighting social problems with information: the
development of a community database-the violence information network. Computers in
Human Services, 15 (1), 21-34.

Miller, W. R. and S. Rollnick (1991). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to


change addictive behavior., The Guilford Press, New York, NY.

Moya, Paula (2002) Learning from Experience: Minority Identities, Multicultural


Struggles. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Murphy, L. J. , Mitchell, D. (1998). When writing helps to heal: E-mail as therapy. British
Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No.1, 21-31.

Murphy, J., Pardek, J. (1988). The computer micro-world, knowledge and social planning.
In Murphy, J., Pardek, (Eds.) Technology and human service delivery. New York:
Haworth Press.

Mutschler, E., Hasenfeld, Y. (1986). Integrated information systems for social work
practice. Social Work, September-October.

NASADAD. (2003). Recommendations Related to Closing the Treatment Gap (Policy


Position Paper). Washington, DC: National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse
Directors..

Natal, Dottie and Walter LaMendola. “An Object Relational Model for the Prevention
Decision Support System” US DHHS, SAMHSA, CSAP, January 15, 2001.

Noel, J., Epstein, J. (2003). Social support and health among senior Internet users: Results
of an online survey. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 22 (3), 35-54.

Nurius, P., Hudson, W. (1988). Computer-based practice: Future dream or current reality?
Social Work, July-August, 357-362.

15
Opalinski, L. (2001). Older adults and the Digital Divide: Assessing results of a Web-based
Survey. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol., No. 3/4 , 203-221.

Oyserman, D. & Benbenishty, R. (1997). Developing and implementing the integrated


information system for foster care and adoption. Computers in Human Services, 14 (1), 1-
20.

Pardeck, J.T. (1997). Computer technology in clinical practice: a critical analysis. Social
Work & Social Sciences Review, 7 (2), 101-111.

Pardeck, J. (1998). Rationalizing decision-making through computer technology: a critical


appraisal. Journal of Health and Social Policy, 9 (4), 19-29.

Pardeck, J.T., Dotson, B.M., Ricketts, A.K., McCully, K., & Lewis, A.E. (1995). A
replication of a study exploring the utilization of computer technology by social workers.
The Clinical Supervisor, 13 (2), 127-140.

Pertierra, R. (2005) Mobile Phones, Identity & Discursive Intimacy, Human Technology,
1(1) April: 23-44.

Pertierra, R,, Ugarte E, Pingol, A.;Hernandez, J. and N. Dacanay. (2002) TXT-ing Selves:
Cellphones and Philippine Modernity, De La Salle University Press, Manila, Philippines.

Rafferty, J., and Wilkinson, A. (1992). New technology in the human services: An equaliser
of opportunities? New Technology in the Human Services, Vol.6, No.2, Summer.

Rapp, L. A., Dulmus, C. N., Wodarski, J. S., & Felt, M. D. (1998). Integrated human
service delivery system: public welfare model. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 22 (2),
151-160.

Relan, A. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and
differences. In Khan, B. H. (Ed.). Web-based instruction. NJ: Educational Techology
Publications Incorporated, 41-46.

Reamer, F. (1986). The use of modern technology in social work: Ethical dilemmas. Social
Work, 31, (6), November-December, 469-476.

Resnick, H., Sherer, M. (1994). Computer games in the human services- a review.
Computers in Human Services, Vol.11, No 1/2.

Resnick, H. (Ed.) (1994). Electronic tools for social work practice & education. New York:
Haworth Press.

Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Reedy, C. S. (2005) Online surveys for BGLT research:
Issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 2, pp. 1-21.

16
Robert Wood Johnson Portfolios. Cell Phones Give Researchers a Window on Young
Mothers' Parenting Practices - Leads to NIH Funded Study.
http://www.rwjf.org/portfolios/resources/grantsreport.jsp?filename=037224.htm&iaid=144
Last updated December 2004.

Robson, D., Robson, M. (1998). Intimacy and computer communication. British Journal of
Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No.1, 33-41.

Rock, B. D., Beckerman, A., Auerbach, C., Cohen, C., Goldstein, M. & Quitkin, E. (1995).
Management of alternate level of care patients using a computerized database. Health &
Social Work, 20 (2), 133-139.

Rock, B. & Congress, E. (1999). The new confidentiality for the 21st century in a managed
care environment. Social Work, 44 (3), 253-262.

Root, L.S. (1996). Computer conferencing in a decentralized program: an occupational


social work example. Administration in Social Work, 20 (1), 31-45.

Rosenheck, R. A. (2002). Organizational process: a missing link between research and


practice. Psychiatric Services, 62, 1607-1612.

Satterwhite, R. and Schoech, D. (1995). Multimedia training for child protective service
workers: Initial test results. In Rafferty, J., Steyaert, J. and Columbi, D. (Eds.). Human
services in the information age. NY: Haworth Press, 81-97.

Schein-Levi, J. & Pollack, D. (1997). Social work, parenting, and the Web. Journal of
Family Social Work, 2 (3), 5-16.

Schneider, S. J., Cantor, D., Malakhoff, L., Arieira, C., Segel, P., Nguyen, K.-L., Guarino
Tancreto, J. (2005) Telephone, Internet, and Paper Data Collection Modes for the Census
2000 Short Form. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 1, pp. 89-101.

Schoech, D., Fitch, D., MacFadden, R., & Schkade, L. (2001). From data to intelligence:
introducing the intelligent organization. Administration in Social Work, Volume 26,
Number 1, 1-21.

Schoech, D. (1999). Human services technology: Understanding, designing and


Implementing computer and internet applications. NY: Haworth.

Schoech, D., Jensen, C., Fulks, J. & Smith, K. K. (1998). Developing and using a
community databank. Computers in Human Services, 15 (1), 35-54.

Schoech, D. (1982). Computer use in human services. New York: Human Sciences Press.

Schonlau, M., Fricker, R.D. Jr and Elliott, M.N. (2001), Conducting Research Surveys via
E-Mail and the Web, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

17
Schopler J. H., Abell, M. D., & Galinsky, M. J. (1998). Technology-based groups: a review
and conceptual framework for practice. Social Work, 43 (3), 254-267.

Schwartz, M. (Ed.) (1983). Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Haworth Press.

Selber, S. A. (2004) Multiliteracies for a Digital Age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois
Press.

Severson,H.H., E. G. Feil, T. Taylor. Parent Net.


http://www.ori.org/Research/scientists/seversonH.html (Retrieved 13 Feb 2006)

Sharron, H. (1984). The ghost in the machine. Social Work Today, 15: 21, 14-17.

Slavin, S. (Ed.) (1982). Applying computers in social service & mental health agencies. New
York: Haworth Press.

Sloboda, Z. S. S. (2002). A Discussion of the Concept of Technology Transfer of Research-


Based Drug "Abuse" Prevention and Treatment Interventions. Substance Use & Misuse,
37(8-10), 1079-1087.

Smith, L. (2003). Internet use among people with HIV/AIDS. New Technology in the
Human Services. Vol. 22 (2), 17-29.

Special Issue: Designing for the mobile device: experiences, challenges, and methods.
(2005). Communications of the ACM 48(7), July.

Steyaert, J. (1995). Challenges of the internet for social workers. New Technology in the
Human Services. Vol. 8, No.3.

Stoddard, J. L., Delucchi, K. L., Muñoz, R. F., Collins, M., Pérez-Stable, E. J., Augustson,
E., Lenert, L. L. (2005) Smoking Cessation Research via the Internet: A Feasibility Study.
Journal of Health Communication, 10, 1, pp. 27-41.

Stoecker, R. and Stuber, A. C. S. (1997). Limited access: the information superhighway


and Ohio's neighborhood-based organizations. Computers in human services, 14 (1), 39-57.

Sussman, M. (Ed.) (1985). Personal computers and the family. New York: Haworth Press.

Tait, A. (1999). Face-to-Face and at a distance: The mediation of guidance and counseling
through the new technologies. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol. 27, No.1,
113-122.

Tate, D., Zabinski, M. (2004). Computer and Internet applications for psychological
treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(2), 209-220.

18
Tichon, J., Shapiro, M. (2003). With a little help from my friends: Children, the Internet
and social support. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 21(4), 73-92.

Tompkins, P. L. & Southward, L. H. (1998). Geographic Information Systems (GIS):


implications for promoting social and economic justice. Computers in Human Services, 15
(2/3), 209-226.

Watson, M. (1997). The Internet as a virtual social work library. New Technology in the
Human Services.

Weaver, D., Moses, T., Furman, W., Lindsey, D. (2003). The effects of computerization on
public child welfare practice. Journal of Social Service Research. 29(4), 67-80.

Weinberg, N., Shmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1996). Online help: cancer patients
participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health & Social Work, 21(1), 24-29.

Yaffe, J., Gotthoffer, D. (2001). Social Work on the Net. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &
Bacon.

19

You might also like