Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COURSE SYLLABUS
Information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use has increased at an
astonishing rate over the past decade. Social workers now use and encounter information
and communication technologies in their professional practice regardless of setting or
population served. These technologies range from the telephone to the video play station.
Despite their proliferation, they are often driven by values that do not consider social work
values of importance – and social workers are not well prepared to deal with the context and
consequence of ICT technologies.
Social workers – unlike some other professions – must not only use ICT as tools, but they
must also exercise a professional responsibility to judge technologies and their application
and question whether or not they promote effective human services, social and economic
justice, a good quality of life, and a multicultural community. Presently it is rare that a
social worker develops or produces ICT applications to alleviate and prevent social
problems affecting individuals, families and communities – though that may soon change.
But whether or not they produce such applications, social workers can be prepared to
influence or encourage ICT applications that support the social work code of ethics.
This course is intended for students in advanced clinical (work with individuals, couples and
families) or community practice (work in administration, community organizing and
development, policy analysis and advocacy) who are interested in the effective use of these
technologies and in developing critical skills that allow them to question, critique, and/or
influence the development of communication and information technology applications. The
course is designed as primarily an experiential course, but also as one that provides the
student with a background in the history, use, and application of ICT in the social work
profession.
In summary, the course will focus on social workers as users of technology and as
questioners of technology. The dual focus will examine communication and information
technologies using a tool metaphor, but extending that metaphor to expose the production of
cultural artifacts that have ethical consequence and that profoundly influence social
development while transmitting social value.
• Increase their familiarity with ICT applications in use in social work and how they are
constructed
• Understand the potential of ICT in social work
• Judge whether populations of interest to social work are or can be empowered via
technological innovations
• Survey the present landscape of communication and information technology
applications, primarily on the Internet, that are specifically related to professional social
work, such as:
Social work knowledge bases
Social work agencies
Social work interventions
Social advocacy
Social work education and training
Ethics
Diversity
Digital divide
Cyber abuse
Cyber counseling/therapy
• Learn how social work practice skills are presently applied in interactive ICT
applications.
• Learn higher level (ICT) skills for advanced social work practice, including use of newer
tools, such as blogging, podcasting, learning management systems, and wikis.
IV READINGS
Required: B. J. Fogg. (2003) Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What
We Think and Do (This book is also available as an electronic resource through Penrose
Library)
V METHODS OF TEACHING
This course utilizes a combination of experiential learning techniques, including
individual investigation, electronic presentations, projects of various types, and
exploration of electronic materials. In addition, there are exercises, discussions, readings
and facilitation by the instructor.
2
VI CONTENT ON SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Throughout this entire course, we will be examining content of historically oppressed
populations including ethnicity, gender, age, sexual orientation, religion/spiritual beliefs,
socioeconomic status, language, differing abilities, geography, and developmental stages. These
topics are crucial to social workers. Each student should be prepared to examine her or his own
feelings regarding the above material.
3
Fourth session: Computers as Medium
Assignment #3 due: Use second life: report experience on wiki.
Experiential Cause and effect experiences
Simulated environments
Simulated objects
Reading: Fogg Chapter 4, pp 61-87
A Bill of Rights for the Information Age (Glastonbury and LaMendola, 1992) at
http://www.du.edu/~wlamendo/techumanity/techumanity.html
Suggested
Review Wikipedia entry “World Summit on the Information Society”
http://webxact.watchfire.com/ A site to test web sites for accessibility.
Bricout, J. (2001). Making computer-mediated education responsive to the
accommodation needs of students with disabilities. Journal of Social Work Education,
Vol. 37, No.2 (Spring/Summer 2001), 267-281. Available through university e-journals.
4
Finn, J., Kerman, B. (2004). Internet risks for foster families online. Journal of Technology in
Human Services, 22 (4), 21-38. Available through university e-journals.
Spence-Diehl, E. (2003). Stalking and technology: The double-edged sword. Journal of
Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(1), 5-18. Available through university e-journals.
Ninth session Social work ethics & the ethics of persuasive technology
Assignment#8 due: Go to the Mayo clinic depression assessment Website. Assess the
website from a social work ethical standpoint
Experiential Is persuasion unethical?
Ethical concerns
Examining intentions, methods, and outcomes
Use with vulnerable groups
Stakeholder analysis
student work on individualized projects
Reading: Fogg Chapter 9, pp 211-239
5
Assessment Classification Range Grade Grade Point
Excellent Work 94-100 A 4.0
(above course expectations) 91-93 A- 3.7
88-90 B+ 3.3
Good Work
84-87 B 3.0
(meets course expectations)
81-83 B- 2.7
78-80 C+ 2.3
Poor Work
74-77 C 2.0
(meets minimal course expectations)
71-73 C- 1.7
Failing Work 70-0 F 0.0
Incomplete* ( I )
*will only be given in accordance with the policies in the Student Manual
If you have a disability protected under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and need to request accommodations, please make
an appointment with the Disability Services Program (DSP); 303-871-2372, located in
Driscoll South, Suite 30. The Handbook for Students with Disabilities is available online
at http://www.du.edu/disability and is also available from Carole Fee Ivanoff, Director
of Student Services for GSSW students. Once documentation has been received by DSP
and the accommodation(s) afforded, please meet with your instructors as early in the
quarter as possible to discuss how the accommodation(s) will be implemented and how
your needs can be appropriately met.
Students taking this course are expected to adhere to the NASW Code of Ethics, the
GSSW Ethical Behavior and Conduct statement in the student handbook, and the rules
regarding Academic Dishonesty, also found in the student handbook. Students are
expected to demonstrate professional behavior at all times, showing respect to peers,
instructors, and diverse points of view. The University of Denver Honor Code defines
plagiarism as representation of another's work or ideas as one's own and fabrication as
falsification or creation of data, research or resources to support academic submission.
Both are academically dishonest and grounds for disciplinary action.
6
XI SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abels, P. (1972). Can computers do social work? Social Work, 17, No.5.
Batagelj, Z., Vehovar, V. (1998). Technical and methodological issues in WWW surveys.
Available: http://www.ris.org/ris98/stlouis/index.html (2000, November)
Becnel, J. M., Ray, S., Wolf, T. M., Lotten, T., & Williams, J. Jr. (1998). The New Orleans
Patient Tracking System (PTS): data management for a network of community-based
alcohol and drug treatment providers. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3-4), 73-98.
Bloom, M., Fischer, J., Orme, J. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the
accountable professional. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bloom, J., Walz, G. (Eds.) (2000). Cybercounseling and cyberlearning: Strategies and
resources for the Millenium. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Bloom, J. (1998). The ethical practice of Web Counseling. British Journal of Guidance &
Counselling, Vol. 26, No. 1, 53-59.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000) How People Learn: Brain,
Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Committee on Developments in the
Science of Learning with additional materials from the Committee on Learning Research
and Educational Practice, M. Suzanne Donovan, John D. Bransford, and James W.
Pellegrino (Eds). Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education of the
National Research Council, National Academy Press, Electronic Version available from
Penrose
7
Bronson, D.E., Pelz, D., Trzcinski, E., (1988). Computerizing your agency’s information
system. NJ: Sage Publications.
Brown, T. G., J. Topp, & D. Ross. (2003). Rationales, obstacles and strategies for local
outcome monitoring systems in substance abuse treatment settings. Journal of Substance
Abuse Treatment, 24, 31-42.
Cahill, M. (1993). Computer technology and the human services in the 90s: Advancing
theory and practice. Computers in Human Services, Vol.9, No.3/4.
Canada, K., Brusca, F. (1991). The technological gender gap: Evidence and
recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Educational
Technology Research & Development, Vol.39, Number 2.
Caputo, R. (1988). Management and information systems in human services. New York:
Haworth Press.
Carillo, T., Kasser, J., and Moretto, A. (1985). Management information systems: Who is in
charge? Social Casework, 417-423.
Cavanagh, K., Shapiro, D. (2004). Computer treatment for common mental health
problems. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(3), 239-251.
Cnaan, R., Parsloe, P. (Eds.) (1989). The impact of information technology on social work
practice. New York: Haworth Press.
Coe, J., Menon, G. (Eds.) (2000). Computers and Information Technology in Social Work:
Education, Training, and Practice. NY: Haworth.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on
learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Collie, K.R., Mitchell, D., Murphy, L. (2000). Skills for online counseling: Maximum
impact on minimum bandwidth. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Cordero, A. (1991). Computers and community organizing: Issues and examples from New
York City. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1.
8
Davidson, T. & Davidson, J.R. (1995). Cost-containment, computers and confidentiality.
Clinical Social Work Journal, 23 (4), 453-464.
DeMuth, P. (1984). Eliza and her offspring. Using computers in clinical practice. New
York: Haworth.
Dombrowski, S., LeMasney, J., Ahia, C., Dickson, S. (2004). Protecting children from
online sexual predators: Technological, psychoeducational and legal considerations.
Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, Vol. 35(1), 65-73.
Eastman, B. (1991). Women, computers and social change. Computers in Human Services,
Vol.8, No.1.
Evans, J.R. and Anil Mathur.(2005) The Value of On-line Surveys. Internet Research
15(2), pp. 195-219.
Falk, D., (2004). Selected websites for high-to-low end NPO website development. Journal
of Technology in Human Services, Vol. 22(3), 81-88.
Figley, C. (Ed.) (1985). Computers and family therapy. New York: Haworth Press
Freddolino, P. (2003). Agency utilization of free Internet web sites. New Technology in the
Human Services. Vol. 22, 67-73.
Fuchs, M.(2006) Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Mobile Phone Surveys. 2nd
International Conference on Telephone Survey Methodology. American Statistical
Association. Miami,Florida: January 2006.
Galinsky, M. J., Schopler, J. H., & Abell, M. D. (1997). Connecting group members
through telephone and computer groups. Health & Social Work, 22 (3), 181-
188.
9
Gandy, J, Tepperman, L. (1990). False alarms: Conclusions and implications. In Gandy, J.,
Tepperman, L. False alarm. Waterloo, ON: Wilfred Laurier Press.
Geiss, G., and Viswanathan, N. (Eds.) (1986). The human edge. New York: Haworth
Press.Services. Vol. 22, 67-73.
Gelman, S. R., Pollack, D., & Weiner, A. (1999). Confidentiality of social work records in
the computer age. Social Work, 44 (3), 243-252.
Giffords, E. (1998). Social work on the Internet: an introduction. Social Work, 43 (3), 243-
251.
Glastonbury, B., and LaMendola, W. (1992). The integrity of intelligence: A bill of rights
for the Information age. NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Glastonbury, B., LaMendola, W., Toole, S. (Eds.) (1988). Information technology and the
human services. Chichester, ENG: John Wiley & Sons.
Goldman, B.A. (1991). The environment and community right to know: Information for
participation. Computers in Human Services, Vol.8, No.1.
Grant, G., & Grobman, L. (1998). The social worker’s internet handbook. PA: White Hat
Communications.
Grigorian, K. H., Sederstrom, S.(2005) Qualitative Comparison of Paper and Online Self-
Administered Modes. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR)
60th Annual Conference, Miami Beach: May 12-15.
Graziani, P., Burzagli, L. (1999). Experience of an electronic newspaper service for the
blind. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 12, Nos. 1 and 2, 26-32.
Gripton, J., Licker, P., deGroot, L. (1986). Applying computers to clinical social work.
Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, Vol.13, No. 1, March.
Hick, S., McNutt, J. (Eds.) (2002). Advocacy, activism and the Internet. Chicago, ILL:
Lyceum Books, Inc.
10
Hile, M. G. (1998). The history and function of the target cities management information
systems: an introduction to the special issue. Computers in Human Services, 14 (3/4), 1-8.
Howard, M.D. (1995). From oral tradition to computerization: A case study of a social
work department. Computers in Human Services, 12 (3-4), 203-219.
Huang H. and S. Liaw.(2005) Exploring users' attitudes and intentions toward the web as a
survey tool. Computers in Human Behavior 21(5) September pp. 729-743.
Joinson, A. N., Woodley, A., Reips, U. (2005) Personalization, authentication and self-
disclosure in self-administered Internet surveys. General Online Research Conference.
German Society for Online Research. Zurich, Switzerland, March 22-23.
Kanani, K., Regehr, C. (2003). Clinical, ethical, and legal issues in e-therapy. Families in
Society, 84, 2, 155-162.
Kardas, E.P., Milford, T. (1996). Using the Internet for social science research and
practice. CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Karon, P. (1996). Client/server system helps find homes for special kids. InfoWorld, 18 (3),
60.
Kaye, R. A., Stephens, R. C., Chen, H. T. & Bruno, W. J. (1998). Development and use of
information systems in the Cleveland Target Cities Demonstration project. Computers in
Human Services, 14 (3/4), 9-28.
Kenwright, M., Liness, S., Marks, I. (2001). Reducing demands on clinicians by offering
computer-aided self-help for phobia/panic: Feasibility study. British Journal of Psychiatry,
Volume 79, 456-459.
Kiernan, N. E., Kiernan, M., Oyler, M. A., Gilles, C.(2005) Is a Web survey as effective as a
mail survey? A field experiment among computer users. American Journal of Evaluation,
26, 2, pp. 245-252.
King, S., Engi, S., Poulos, S. (1998). Using the Internet to assist family therapy. British
Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No. 1, 43-52.
Khan, B.H. (Ed.) (1997). Web-Based instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational
Technology Publications, Incorporated.
11
Knudsen, H. K. P. M. R. (2004). Modeling the use of innovations in private treatment
organizations: The role of absorptive capacity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26,
51-59.
LaMendola, Walter & Bryan Glastonbury. “Critique of the United Nations World Summit
on the Information Society Draft Declaration of Principles and Plan of Action.” Expert
Meeting, Maiden Bradley, England, June , 2003. Retrieved 26 June 2003
http:\\www.stakes.fi.
LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. A Casebook of Computer
Applications in Health and Social Services. New York, Haworth Press. 1989.
LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. “A Casebook of Computer
Applications in Health and Social Services: Part Two”, Computers in Human Services,
Volume 4, Numbers 3, 4, 1989.
LaMendola, Walter F., Glastonbury, B. and Stuart Toole, eds. “A Casebook of Computer
Applications in Health and Social Services: Part One”, Computers in Human Services,
Volume 4, Numbers 1,2, 1989.
LaMendola, Walter F. Distance Learning in Glastonbury B., LaMendola, Walter F., and
Stuart Toole, eds. Information Technology & The Human Services. London, John Wiley.
1988.
12
LaMendola, Walter F., “Software Development in the USA,” Computer Applications in
Social Work and the Allied Professions. Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring, 1986.
Lange, A., Schrieken, J. van de Ven, J., Bredeweg, B., Emmelkamp, P. (2000). ‘Interapy’:
The effects of a short protocolled treatment of posttraumatic stress and pathological grief
through the Internet. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 28, 175-192.
Leung, P., Cheung, K., Stevenson, K. (1994). Advancing competent social work practice: A
computer-based approach to child protective service training. Computers in Human
Services, Vol.11, No.3/4.
Levenson, D. (1997). Online counseling: Opportunity and risk. NASW News, September,
p.3.
Lidsky, D., Kwon, R. (1997). Searching the net. PC Magazine, December 2nd, 227-258.
Link, M. W., Mokdad, A. (2005) Alternative Modes for Health Surveillance Surveys: An
Experiment with Web, Mail, and Telephone. Epidemiology, 16, 5, pp. 701-704.
Linn, N. A., Schneider, S. J., McCreery, R. & Kasab, D. S. (1998). Expert system for
utilization of alcohol and drug abuse cases. Computers in Human Services, 15 (4), 1-12.
13
Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. E. (1985). The reliability and validity of instruments for the
assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 903–
908.
Luce, K. H., Winzelberg, A. J., Das, S., Osborne, M. I., Bryson, S. W., Taylor, C. B. (2006)
Reliability of self-report: paper versus online administration. Computers in Human
Behaviour (in press).
Mangunkusumo R., P. W. Moorman, A. E. Van Den Berg-de Ruiter, J. Van Der Lei, H.J.
De Koning, H. Raat. (2005) Internet-administered adolescent health questionnaires
compared with a paper version in a randomized study. Journal of Adolescent Health 36 (1)
January, Page 70.
MacFadden, R. J., Maiter, S., Dumbrill, G. (2002). High tech and high touch: The human
face of online education. In Resnick, H., Anderson, P. (Eds.). Human services technology:
Innovations in practice and education. NY:Haworth Press, 283-300.
MacFadden, R.J. (2000). Billy breaks the rules. Journal of Technology in Human Services,
Vol.17 (4), 53-58.
McCabe, S. E., C. J. Boyd, A. Young, S. Crawford, D. Pope (2005) Mode effects for
collecting alcohol and tobacco data among 3rd and 4th grade students: A randomized pilot
study of Web-form versus paper-form surveys. Addictive Behaviors (30)4, pp. 663-671.
Marson, S. (1997). A selective history of Internet technology and social work. Computers in
Human Services, 14 (2), 35-49.
Martin, John, Walter LaMendola and David Price. “Developing Web based Internet
Services for Criminal Justice Systems,” Judges Journal, Volume 24, Number 2, 1993.
14
Martinez-Brawley, E.E. (1995). Knowledge diffusion and transfer of technology:
Conceptual premises and concrete steps for human services innovators. Social Work, 40
(5), 670-682.
McCready, D. J., Pierce, S., Rahn, S. L., & Were, K. (1996). Third generation information
systems: integrating costs and outcomes. Tools for professional development and program
evaluation. Administration in Social Work, 20 (1), 1-15.
Miesenberger, K. (2002). Computers helping people with special needs. NY: Sprinter-
Verlag.
Miller, D. B. & DiGiuseppe, D. (1998). Fighting social problems with information: the
development of a community database-the violence information network. Computers in
Human Services, 15 (1), 21-34.
Murphy, L. J. , Mitchell, D. (1998). When writing helps to heal: E-mail as therapy. British
Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No.1, 21-31.
Murphy, J., Pardek, J. (1988). The computer micro-world, knowledge and social planning.
In Murphy, J., Pardek, (Eds.) Technology and human service delivery. New York:
Haworth Press.
Mutschler, E., Hasenfeld, Y. (1986). Integrated information systems for social work
practice. Social Work, September-October.
Natal, Dottie and Walter LaMendola. “An Object Relational Model for the Prevention
Decision Support System” US DHHS, SAMHSA, CSAP, January 15, 2001.
Noel, J., Epstein, J. (2003). Social support and health among senior Internet users: Results
of an online survey. New Technology in the Human Services. Vol. 22 (3), 35-54.
Nurius, P., Hudson, W. (1988). Computer-based practice: Future dream or current reality?
Social Work, July-August, 357-362.
15
Opalinski, L. (2001). Older adults and the Digital Divide: Assessing results of a Web-based
Survey. Journal of Technology in Human Services, Vol., No. 3/4 , 203-221.
Pardeck, J.T. (1997). Computer technology in clinical practice: a critical analysis. Social
Work & Social Sciences Review, 7 (2), 101-111.
Pardeck, J.T., Dotson, B.M., Ricketts, A.K., McCully, K., & Lewis, A.E. (1995). A
replication of a study exploring the utilization of computer technology by social workers.
The Clinical Supervisor, 13 (2), 127-140.
Pertierra, R. (2005) Mobile Phones, Identity & Discursive Intimacy, Human Technology,
1(1) April: 23-44.
Pertierra, R,, Ugarte E, Pingol, A.;Hernandez, J. and N. Dacanay. (2002) TXT-ing Selves:
Cellphones and Philippine Modernity, De La Salle University Press, Manila, Philippines.
Rafferty, J., and Wilkinson, A. (1992). New technology in the human services: An equaliser
of opportunities? New Technology in the Human Services, Vol.6, No.2, Summer.
Rapp, L. A., Dulmus, C. N., Wodarski, J. S., & Felt, M. D. (1998). Integrated human
service delivery system: public welfare model. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 22 (2),
151-160.
Relan, A. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and
differences. In Khan, B. H. (Ed.). Web-based instruction. NJ: Educational Techology
Publications Incorporated, 41-46.
Reamer, F. (1986). The use of modern technology in social work: Ethical dilemmas. Social
Work, 31, (6), November-December, 469-476.
Resnick, H., Sherer, M. (1994). Computer games in the human services- a review.
Computers in Human Services, Vol.11, No 1/2.
Resnick, H. (Ed.) (1994). Electronic tools for social work practice & education. New York:
Haworth Press.
Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., Reedy, C. S. (2005) Online surveys for BGLT research:
Issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality, 49, 2, pp. 1-21.
16
Robert Wood Johnson Portfolios. Cell Phones Give Researchers a Window on Young
Mothers' Parenting Practices - Leads to NIH Funded Study.
http://www.rwjf.org/portfolios/resources/grantsreport.jsp?filename=037224.htm&iaid=144
Last updated December 2004.
Robson, D., Robson, M. (1998). Intimacy and computer communication. British Journal of
Guidance & Counselling, Vol.26, No.1, 33-41.
Rock, B. D., Beckerman, A., Auerbach, C., Cohen, C., Goldstein, M. & Quitkin, E. (1995).
Management of alternate level of care patients using a computerized database. Health &
Social Work, 20 (2), 133-139.
Rock, B. & Congress, E. (1999). The new confidentiality for the 21st century in a managed
care environment. Social Work, 44 (3), 253-262.
Satterwhite, R. and Schoech, D. (1995). Multimedia training for child protective service
workers: Initial test results. In Rafferty, J., Steyaert, J. and Columbi, D. (Eds.). Human
services in the information age. NY: Haworth Press, 81-97.
Schein-Levi, J. & Pollack, D. (1997). Social work, parenting, and the Web. Journal of
Family Social Work, 2 (3), 5-16.
Schneider, S. J., Cantor, D., Malakhoff, L., Arieira, C., Segel, P., Nguyen, K.-L., Guarino
Tancreto, J. (2005) Telephone, Internet, and Paper Data Collection Modes for the Census
2000 Short Form. Journal of Official Statistics, 21, 1, pp. 89-101.
Schoech, D., Fitch, D., MacFadden, R., & Schkade, L. (2001). From data to intelligence:
introducing the intelligent organization. Administration in Social Work, Volume 26,
Number 1, 1-21.
Schoech, D., Jensen, C., Fulks, J. & Smith, K. K. (1998). Developing and using a
community databank. Computers in Human Services, 15 (1), 35-54.
Schoech, D. (1982). Computer use in human services. New York: Human Sciences Press.
Schonlau, M., Fricker, R.D. Jr and Elliott, M.N. (2001), Conducting Research Surveys via
E-Mail and the Web, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
17
Schopler J. H., Abell, M. D., & Galinsky, M. J. (1998). Technology-based groups: a review
and conceptual framework for practice. Social Work, 43 (3), 254-267.
Schwartz, M. (Ed.) (1983). Using computers in clinical practice. New York: Haworth Press.
Selber, S. A. (2004) Multiliteracies for a Digital Age. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois
Press.
Sharron, H. (1984). The ghost in the machine. Social Work Today, 15: 21, 14-17.
Slavin, S. (Ed.) (1982). Applying computers in social service & mental health agencies. New
York: Haworth Press.
Smith, L. (2003). Internet use among people with HIV/AIDS. New Technology in the
Human Services. Vol. 22 (2), 17-29.
Special Issue: Designing for the mobile device: experiences, challenges, and methods.
(2005). Communications of the ACM 48(7), July.
Steyaert, J. (1995). Challenges of the internet for social workers. New Technology in the
Human Services. Vol. 8, No.3.
Stoddard, J. L., Delucchi, K. L., Muñoz, R. F., Collins, M., Pérez-Stable, E. J., Augustson,
E., Lenert, L. L. (2005) Smoking Cessation Research via the Internet: A Feasibility Study.
Journal of Health Communication, 10, 1, pp. 27-41.
Sussman, M. (Ed.) (1985). Personal computers and the family. New York: Haworth Press.
Tait, A. (1999). Face-to-Face and at a distance: The mediation of guidance and counseling
through the new technologies. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, Vol. 27, No.1,
113-122.
Tate, D., Zabinski, M. (2004). Computer and Internet applications for psychological
treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology. Vol. 60(2), 209-220.
18
Tichon, J., Shapiro, M. (2003). With a little help from my friends: Children, the Internet
and social support. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 21(4), 73-92.
Watson, M. (1997). The Internet as a virtual social work library. New Technology in the
Human Services.
Weaver, D., Moses, T., Furman, W., Lindsey, D. (2003). The effects of computerization on
public child welfare practice. Journal of Social Service Research. 29(4), 67-80.
Weinberg, N., Shmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1996). Online help: cancer patients
participate in a computer-mediated support group. Health & Social Work, 21(1), 24-29.
Yaffe, J., Gotthoffer, D. (2001). Social Work on the Net. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn &
Bacon.
19