Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas at the same time, and still retain the ability to function F. Scott Fitzgerald
PARADIGM
The way you see something, your point of view, frame of reference, or belief.
Paradigm in brief
Different people interpret things in different ways. A mental construction by which we organize our reasoning and classify our knowledge. Two people look at a vast, beautiful mountain. One sees evidence of a good God; the other sees a geological formation. Lights are present in the sky. One person sees UFOs; the other sees a freak weather phenomenon.
I am a man.
I am mortal
If our premises are true, the correct application of the rules of logic guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
The old man had just turned off the lights in the store and was preparing to lock up and go home when a youth appeared and demanded money. The owner opened the cash register, the contents were grabbed, and the man ran away. The police were informed immediately.
What do we know of this incident and what we dont? What are our assumptions?
Questions..
i) ii) iii) iv) v)
Did the young man appear after the lights had been turned off? Was the old man preparing to go home? Was the gender of the owner revealed in the story? Was the robber a man? Did the man run away after demanding for the cash?
A crucial aspect of the robbery paradigm is that it remains hidden unless we have reason to bring it out into the open. This means that its central influence on what we know can go unnoticed.
The robbery paradigm consists of all the expectations that we have about robberies. Other possible aspects of the paradigm relating simply to the man who demanded the money (who said it was a robbery?) might be:
i. ii. iii. iv.
His age (was he over 70 years old?) His race (do you hold stereotypical views of race?) His clothing (was he wearing a suit or a balaclava?) What was he carrying (do you think he had an umbrella, a gun or a heavy pile of books?)
The mind fills in the missing details it assumes certain things and to do this it must rely on certain guiding principles, certain stories about stories (meta-stories). These are our paradigms.
A paradigm is like a map in our head. We assume that the way we see things is the way they really are or the way they should be.
More on choosing
We should not be deceived into respecting ridiculous beliefs just because they are part of someone elses paradigm. Closed-mindedness and bigotry. Paradigms may be seriously flawed, but so may ours. There is no sure-fire method of choosing the right paradigm any more than there is a sure way of finding a true scientific theory of writing a beautiful piece of music. The best we can do is to be aware of where our own beliefs lie, and to test them continually against experience and reason.
A prison is a place where: Society takes revenge against criminals. Criminals are punished so that they do not re-offend. Society protects itself by locking criminals away. Criminals are re-educated so that they do not reoffend. Life is made so unpleasant that potential criminals are deterred from crime. Consider the following three stories
2.
3.
4.
5.
First story
I am a farmer from Tanzania. My farm is by the coast, and I have much work to feed my family of six children and five grandchildren. One day I was walking home for food when a group of white men came upon me, attacked me and carried me off to their ship. They made me work for eight months on the voyage to France, cleaning the decks. When we arrived I had a chance to escape, so I ran, but I was weak and one of the sailors caught me. We fought, and I was crazy for freedom, and my life. I pushed him into a rough sea and he drowned. In court I was found guilty of murder. My sentence is to be here until I die
Second story
I am here for theft. Alas I have no excuse I stole from my kind and generous employer when he left me in charge of the house. I could be freed if I could repay him, but I do not have the money to do so. I deserve this sentence the punishment is just. I do not ask for your leniency. My trial was fair and my sentence was just. I have begged my employer for forgiveness, but I cannot repay the money I took from him. At least I can repay my debt to society. Thank you for considering to release me, but I am sure there are others who deserve freedom more than I do.
Third story I was in love with the daughter of a rich man, and she
loved me too. But my family was poor, and the father thought I was not good enough for her. So one day when his daughter was not there he gave me a diamond ring, and told me that he would give me a thousand gold coins if he never saw me again. His daughter appeared before I could reply, and I did not tell her. But I also did not accept the offer. The next day the police came to my home, searched it and found the ring and I was taken to jail. At the trial, the father said that I had stolen the ring and as he was rich the judge took his word over mine. My beloved still waits for me; she suspects the truth. Please release me from this unjust imprisonment.
Would you have released: the most deserving prisoner, the prisoner whose release would serve justice best or the prisoner who is ready to return to society? Consider the effect of releasing each of the three prisoners on: i) the rich merchant whose ring the court had judged stolen ii) the daughter who was waiting for her lover to be released iii) the family of the man who waits for his release from a foreign prison iv) the community and the judge who have convicted the confessed thief
5.
The view of the classical Olympians was replaced by one God. Pagan augurs and soothsayers were replaced by the Church. The shadowy Greek Hades was replaced by the Christian Heaven and Hell. Platos theory that man exists to contemplate God was replaced by the idea that man exists to worship Him. Man is superior to everything except God was the basic conception
UNTIL1543
Some discoveries simply cannot fit into the model, and when that occurs, and the new discovery is certain and important enough, then the model itself has to change. A new piece of knowledge is so fundamentally different to previous ideas that we throw all our ideas out and build a new paradigm around this discovery. such a thing happened in 1543.
1543
A polish astronomer named Nicolaus Copernicus published a work called On the Revolution of the Heavenly Orbs. He questioned the first belief in the paradigm set, the belief that the Earth was at the centre of the Universe. His belief and argument met with violent opposition from the Catholic Church (including his successors Kepler and Galileo) and was persecuted for his discovery. In the following centuries man was certain of his superiority not through his faith, but through his scientific inquiry. We call this the Enlightenment paradigm.
Enlightenment Paradigm
Applied to the 18th century the desire for scientific understanding displaced the need for theological dispute. Man became obsessed with understanding the world around him. Man was able to alter his living environment; build houses out of bricks, make weapons out of metal ore, plough fields and make them produce crops, use steam to drive an engine, alter the landscape to make it more beautiful than nature. This sense of purpose of adapting nature to our own ends is characteristic of Enlightenment thought. Though such adaptation had existed thousands of years, it had never been paradigmatic.
In our era
We live in a unique time: in the last few decades we have watched scientists genetically alter living matter. We have seen men walking on the moon, babies conceived outside the womb, the cloning of animals, etc. Could it be possible, in these turbulent times, that there is still a paradigm to which we all more or less subscribe? After the findings of Copernicus, Darwin, Freud (and others), how should todays paradigm look like? Spend some time thinking about todays paradigm. How do you think it would look like?
Modern paradigm
Humans are random evolutionary accidents. Humankind is one of a billion biological species. There is no God. There is no purpose to life. There is no path to truth.
There is no hierarchy, and there is no favoured place for man. Such a paradigm seems to be accepted by many in the scientific community.
10
Stephan Hawking
We have developed from the geocentric cosmologies of Ptolemy and his forebears, through the heliocentric cosmology of Copernicus and Galileo, to the modern picture in which the Earth is a medium-sized planet orbiting around an average star in the outer suburbs of an ordinary spiral galaxy, which is itself only one of about a million galaxies in the observable universe. Yet [some]would claim that this whole vast construction exists simply for our sake. This is hard to believe
A Brief History of Time
Humans are at the center of the Universe. Humans are placed there by God(s). Human purpose is the worship of God(s). Religion is the path to truth.
Humans are random evolutionary accidents. Humankind is one of a billion biological species. There is no God. There is no purpose in life. There is no path to truth.
Culture
Culture mediates almost every aspect of our daily lives and experiences; how we eat, how we dress, our relationships, how we speak to others, how we expect to be treated, and so on. Different cultures hold certain values which may not be shared by other cultures, hence practices differ around the world. Culture as a paradigm it forms a filter for us to interpret the world, and it should be clear that cultures based on national/ racial lines are just one type of culture.
11
Culture as a paradigm
Spoken language, media, religious beliefs, academic trends, political movements, body language, personal space habits, cuisine, etc. Cultural eating habits eating habits vary from one culture to another. One may view that eating with your hands as unacceptable whereas for some others it is a cultural practice. Dishes such as nasi padang and biryani are meant to be eaten with your fingers, as their strong aroma of spices will linger as a memento of a really good meal. Eating with hands is a common religious practice in many parts of the world, including Asia, Africa and the Middle East. Of course, we need to be careful that we reject other cultural habits for good reasons and not just because they come from other cultures. Otherwise, we are guilty of blind prejudice.
Spitting in public. When invited to a party, bringing a friend is fine. A womans primary role in life is to serve her husband and raise his children. Parents decide who their children will marry. Young people usually live with their parents after they get married.
Video 1
Japanese Dining Etiquette Watch the video and note how the foreigner feels about Japanese eating habits.
Also note what IB Learner Profile attributes assist in understanding how to be respectful and tolerant to different cultural practices.
12
Chopsticks Etiquette
Sticking chopsticks vertically straight up into a bowl of rice is considered taboo because this resembles the offering bowl of uncooked rice at a Buddhist altar during funerals.
Video 2: A key element to our understanding of paradigms and interpretations is that of language. Evidently, not knowing the language of a particular culture will cause displacement and alienation.
What was their experience on the flight to their destination? How do the locals view the foreigners? What are their (foreigners) complaints? How were they culturally displaced? Note their feelings.
13
Summary
What is a paradigm shift? A paradigm shift is a way of looking at something differently. We are stepping outside the box. When we make a paradigm shift we can see, think, feel and behave differently. Example: Ptolemy thought the earth was the center of the universe. Copernicus believed the sun was the center of the universe (a paradigm shift occurred).
14