Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Panayotis Zacharioudakis Senior Researcher NTUA R&D Consultant OceanFinance COSTA Greek Member State Coordinator
6 March 2014
Presentation Outline
Introduction The Perspective of LNG as Fuel COSTA Project @ a Glance Facts and Figures for LNG Financials Ports / Terminals Short Sea Shipping Transition to the LNG Era Conclusions
COSTA Project The Financials of LNG as Fuel
Introduction
Introduction
Without Major Accidents or Safety Problems either in Port or at Sea We should Follow a Mindful Approach for LNG as Fuel
An Accident Would Set Back the Planning for LNG as Fuel for Decades!!!
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
COM(2013) 18. DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure. All maritime and inland ports and roads of the TEN-T Core Network wil be equipped with LNG refuelling points. It also requires providing a sufficient number of CNG refuelling points.( by 31/12/2020)
Introduction
Introduction
COSTA Project
@ a Glance
COSTA - EU Co-funded Project
COSTA Project CO2 Transport emissions Abatement by LNG (2012 2014). Development of an LNG adoption Masterplan in the Mediterranean Sea.
COSTA Project
MasterPlan
Howmuch? DemandAnalysis Where? SupplyAnalysis
Recommendation
COSTA Project
Continuation
COSTA Political Closure European Parliament, 19 02 2014 , Brussels
EU Foresees 2 Regional Projects (2014 - 2015)
11
COSTA Project
Obtain Information for Major Hubs, Satellite Ports: LNG Demand per Site & Annum Infrastructure Investment Costs OPEX per Annum Projects Viability Required Bunkering Surcharge
12
Ports / Terminals
13
Ports / Terminals
Market Survey:
Collect Statistical Data Port Authorities Statistic Agency
14
Ports / Terminals
15
Ports / Terminals
16
Ports / Terminals
Piraeus:
Vehicles Carrier - Car Terminal 716 Port Calls / 202 Vessels 2.398 Port Calls / 302 Vessels 770 Port Calls / 110 Vessels 4.293 Port Calls / 31 Vessels Container Ship - Container Terminal Cruise Ship - Passenger Terminal Ro-Pax Ship - Passenger Terminal
17
Intelligence in Shipping
Introduction
18
Ports / Terminals
19
Intelligence in Shipping
Ports / Terminals
Piraeus is a Major Short & Deep Sea Hub Age Determines Retrofit Potential Size Determines LNG Demand
Piraeus:
20
Ports / Terminals
Piraeus:
Destination and Installed Power are also Critical for LNG Demand
Small Ro-Ro/Pax Number of Arrivals Average Installed Power [kW] Average Service Speed [ knots ] Average Age 1132 12.735,6 22,2 20,4
21
Ports / Terminals
Piraeus:
Same Preprocessing Analysis for all Critical Vessel Types Calculating for Each vessel Category: Expected Number of Port Calls in 2020 & 2030 Average Refueling Quantity (m3) Expected Percentage of LNG Fuelled Vessels Expected Percentage of Vessels Refueling in Port Expected Number of Annual Refuelings Expected Annual Demand for LNG (m3)
22
Ports / Terminals
1355
39
60,00
314
Medium Container Ship Small Passenger Cruise Large Passenger Cruise Small Vehicles Carrier Large Passenger Ro-Ro Ship (Vehicles) Piraeus - Crete -Piraeus Small RO-PAX Piraeus - Cyclades Piraeus Large RO-PAX Piraeus - Cyclades Piraeus Large RO-PAX Piraeus - North Aegean - Piraeus Large RO-PAX Piraeus - Dodecanese Piraeus
48 48 71 53 100 74 77 74 100
201 84 202 125 708 36630,06 836 34052,60 580 39749,70 300 66237,46 274 12053,30 91024,25 9618,18 133659,18
23
Sm al lC
1000 1200 1400 200 400 600 800 0
Piraeus 2020:
on t ai ne rS hi p ax C re te Cy c la de s lad es
La rg e La rg e Ro P ax Pa xC yc Sm La rg e Pa ss La rg e al lR o Ro P
Ports / Terminals
24
La rg e Pa ss
Piraeus 2020:
100
200
300
400
500
La rg e Ro P en ge r Cr
Ports / Terminals
25
Ports / Terminals
Piraeus 2020:
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
es e e od ec ax yc la de s an Cr et
rg e
La rg e
La
ax C
xD
Ro
Ro P
La rg e
Ro P ax N
Ro P a
La r
ge
Sm
or th
Ports / Terminals
27
Ports / Terminals
LNG Demand: 225,000 tons / 500,000 m3 per Annum (2020)
Bunkering Surcharge for 15 years PBP (Discounted Cash flows) No EU Funding: 170 per ton 75% EU: 97 per ton
97 m
14 m
Investment Cost Annual Opera ngas Cost 28 COSTA Project The Financials of LNG Fuel
Ports / Terminals
Patra:
Ro-Pax Operations in Adriatic Sea Represent a Major Demand Driver Distance From Revithousa LNG Import Terminal Increase substantially Increases Cost Financial Analysis shows nitial Investment Exceeds 80 m (Need for LNG Storage) Annual Operating Cost for 2020 & 2030 Close to10 m A Surcharge of 250 per ton of LNG is sufficient for a Pay Back Period (discounted Cash flows) of 15 Years for the Investment of the Port
Thessaloniki:
Due to Vessel Types Calling at the Port Demand for LNG is Estimated to be Less than 10,000 ton per Year
29
Ports / Terminals
Genova 2020
initial Investment 85-105 m Annual Operating Cost exceeds 15 m A Surcharge of 110 per ton of LNG for a 15 years Pay Back Period initial Investment 80-105 m Annual Operating Cost for 2020 exceeds12 m A Surcharge of 150 per ton of LNG for a 15 years Pay Back Period initial Investment 30-50 m Annual Operating Cost for 2020 about 6 m A Surcharge of 250 per ton of LNG for a 15 years Pay Back Period initial Investment 30-50 m Annual Operating Cost for 2020 about 8 m A Surcharge of 150 per ton of LNG for a 15 years Pay Back Period
COSTA Project The Financials of LNG as Fuel
Napoli 2020
Ravenna 2020:
Venezia 2020:
Intelligence in Shipping
Poseidon-Med
31
32
Indicative Cost to Comply with Sulphur Cap Requirements (e.g. Large RoPax Vessel) MGO < 1 m Scrubber Approx. 5 m LNG Approx. 8 m
Consider also the: Alternative Fuels Spreads Reduction of the Specific Fuel Consumption with the Use of LNG (Save as you Sale) Various Technical Problems of Non-LNG Alternatives Economies of Scale will Decrease Retrofitting cost
33
169
34
Spread MGO-LNG
35
For 10 per MMbtu for LNG LNG-HFO Spread is 169 per ton
Spread LNG-HFO
36
Treats
High and/or Volatile LNG Price
Lead to Almost Zero LNG Fueled Orderbook in Future Make Retrofitting of Middle Aged Vessels not Feasible in Financial Terms Turn Existing LNG Fueled Projects to Toxic Investments
Sustainability
The Use of LNG as Fuel will Increase Demand and Sooner or Later the Price. Some Say that LNG Production Might not Meet Demand by 2030. Uncertainties on LNG Price and Spread are Present
37
Possibilities
Ability to Manage LNG Price and Spread
Political Means to Manage LNG & LSF Spread Use of Risk Management Tools. Risk Management can do very Little to Reduce Variability, but can be very Effective in Reducing Uncertainty for those Involved in Risk-Taking Decisions Know & Avoid Catastrophic Risks Impugn Greed For Profits Or Phobic Attitudes!!! Technocratic Criteria In Financing Establish Formal Procedures For Rating Corporate Performance and Investment Evaluation
38
Possibilities
By 2020:
Hopefully Economy will Recover Starting a New Shipping / Shipbuilding Cycle Economies of scale and widespread of LNG would reduce Equipment Cost There is Time to Solve all Technical Issues and Train an adequate Number of Skilled Seafarers
39
Conclusions
Mandatory Regulations in 2020: Directive for LNG Bunkering Stations @ Core Ports (Supply) Low Sulphur Cap in Med (Demand)
Transfer and Adapt Know-How from the Baltic / Singapore in Technical, Regulatory and Safety Issues
40
Conclusions
41
Conclusions
LNG as Fuel will have Enormous Side Benefits: LNG Bunkering Services Infrastructure Construction Ship & Terminal Equipment Shipbuilding & Retrofitting Services Synergies with Mainland Energy & Transportation Sectors
42
Conclusions
But:
43
Conclusions
Despite:
High Initial Investment Cost for Infrastructure
44
Conclusions
Despite:
High Initial Investment Cost for Retrofits and New Buildings
45
Recommendations
Help Organize an Efficient Market for Natural Gas to Ensure Availability at Reasonable Prices
Reassess EU Incentives. Not only for the LNG Supply (Infrastructure Works) but also for Demand (Vessels) . Markets are Always Demand
Driven
46
Recommendations
47
48