Elementary GoodWork Toolkit Amy Hoffman Teachers College, Columbia University December, 2013
2
Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Literature Review ................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology and Work Plan ............................................................................................ 11 The Study .......................................................................................................................... 15 Data Collection ................................................................................................................. 16 The Findings ..................................................................................................................... 18 Results and Discussion ..................................................................................................... 20 References ......................................................................................................................... 23 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 24 A- Toolkit Narratives .................................................................................................... 24 B- Introductory Lessons ................................................................................................ 27 C- Word Mapping Lesson ............................................................................................. 47 D- Video Discussion Lesson ......................................................................................... 53 E- Quandary Game Lesson ........................................................................................... 57 F- Pre- and Post-assessment On-Demand Assessment ................................................. 61 G- Student Work Samples ............................................................................................ 64 H- Student Work Samples ............................................................................................ 68 I- Student Work Samples .............................................................................................. 73 J- Student Work Samples .............................................................................................. 77 K- Student Work Samples ............................................................................................ 82 L- Student Work Samples ............................................................................................. 86 M- Partner Ethical Narratives Lesson ........................................................................... 91
S
Introduction As described on the GoodWork website (http://www.thegoodproject.org), the GoodWork Toolkit was developed as an approach to engage individuals and groups in conversation and reflection about good work. Published in 2010, the Toolkit Guidebook contains narratives and dilemmas faced by workers, young and old, which are accompanied by activities and opportunities for reflection. The Toolkit comes with a collection of 50 of these narratives derived from stories of individuals from different professions. The Toolkit also has a deck of Value Cards--a set of cards with varying values on each intended to be sorted into most to least important as each value relates to the individual. To date, the Toolkit has been used in a variety of settings, including professional settings, employee development, and in high school and college classrooms across the globe. Despite the versatility of the Toolkit, one space it was not able to influence was in elementary classrooms. At the annual Project Zero Summer Institutes, elementary school teachers would frequently ask the project researchers if there were any materials for young students. It was realized then that there was a need to adapt the Toolkit for a younger audience, as the message of carrying out responsible, high quality, and honest work is important at any age because the younger students begin to appreciate ethics, excellence, and engagement as workers and citizens, the more powerful their understanding will be. So, in the summer of 2011, my mother, Jo Hoffman, who is a faculty researcher in early childhood and elementary practices for 21 st century learning and teaching, contributed to the GoodWork Toolkit blog with an entry titled, Will young children 4
learning about choices and purpose better prepare them for navigating adolescence in a digital world? tying her current research to the concept of the 3 Es (ethics, excellence, and engagement) to the early childhood classroom. Given our frequent conversations about the choices that learners face in the digital age, I posted a response about looking to apply some of the concepts presented for older students in the upcoming school year. Thus the process of developing the GoodWork Toolkit for Elementary Grades started. I began writing curriculum to implement with my students with the goal of preparing young students with the base understanding needed to ethically navigate using the principles of good work in the digital age. For the purpose of this study, I chose to analyze student assessment data before and after the implementation of the curriculum that I have written. In doing so, my aim is to understand the effects and prove the validity in beginning the complex conversation of ethics, excellence, and engagement with young students.
Literature Review Research surrounding social skills and early childhood development points to the need for young students to be exposed to concepts of moral reasoning at a young age. M. Eugene Gilliom (1981) began a discussion of the interdependence of the global society. In his paper, Global Education and the Social Studies, Gilliom outlines the increasing, even in 1981, need for understanding amongst students of the fact that no society has a corner on truth and wisdom and that no nations view of the world is universally shared (p. 170). He asserts that global education as: S
those educational efforts designed to cultivate in young people a global perspective and to develop in them the knowledge, skills, and attitude needed to live effectively in a world possessing limited natural resources and characterized by ethnic diversity (p. 170). If this is the case, it is imperative in the digital age, where students will be working with the global community on a frequent basis come entering the work force, that students learn skills and strategies for working with members of a different culture with direct ideas and morals. Another study based around moral development and the social realm came out of the Journal of Philosophy of Education and Gert Biesta of the University of Luxembourg. This study focuses on the use of developing knowledge of philosophy with young students to foster thinking skills as well as develop a community of enquiry. When engaging young students in developing the social skills necessary to navigate the digital world, Biesta emphasizes the work of Hannam and Echeverria (2009). This work focuses on the use of philosophical reasoning with teenagers. Biesta says the use of a community of philosophical enquiry the purpose is to construct knowledge together and the aim is to promote cooperation in illuminating a path to come closer to the truth of things (Hannam and Echeverria, 2009, p. 8) (Biesta, 2011, p. 307). In work with early childhood students, this concept remains true. In creating a community of philosophical thinkers, the students are able to develop skills such as thinking critically, reflectively, and reasonably (Biesta, 2011, p. 306). Furthermore, 6
Biesta claims that in fostering this type of social community, the development of moral reasoning and reflection can occur (2011). While working with the concepts and activities of the Elementary GoodWork Toolkit curriculum, students are being afforded the opportunity to construct a community of reflective, philosophical thinkers. In creating this environment at a young age, the aim is to allow these students to have the skills needed to work with and value the opinions of others both globally and locally. Another sub-topic worth exploring is the implication of this type of instruction on early childhood development. Minkang Kim and Derek Sankey of Seoul National University in Korea present an argument in their article entitled, Toward a Dynamic Systems Approach to moral development and moral education: a response to the JME Special Issue, September 2008, about the Dynamic Systems Approach (DSA) and its connection to possible moral reasoning development (2009). Kim and Sankey look at the information presented in a special edition of The Journal of Moral Education to mark the 50 th anniversary of Lawrence Kohlbergs dissertation, which is seen as pioneering work in the field of moral education. The work published in this issue speaks to the need to move past the standard model of moral education that Kohlberg outlined in his dissertation to a model that encompasses the whole child, not just the personality of a child (2009). Kim and Sankey outline a paradigm [that declares that] moral development shares the same dynamic processes found within the whole of human development, including cognitive and motor development (Kim & Sankey, 2009, p. 284). This conversation that is presented in the basis of the GoodWork Toolkit curriculum- 7
providing teachers with activities and discussions for students that encompass the whole person, allowing young students to construct meaning of moral reasoning and development through the use of different learning styles and metacognitive processes. But how is this accomplished? Howard Gardner published a book entitled The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach in 1991 and makes compelling arguments based around the role of the adult or teacher in helping young students to construct their understanding of the world around them. The young child masters a great deal of information and appears highly competent in her circumscribed world. As we have seen, the child can use and comprehend symbol systems fluently and can also offer workaday theories and explanations of the worlds of mind, matter, life, and self. Because of the ease with which there performances are expressed, I shall term them performances of intuitive (nave or natural) understanding. It should be emphasized that these understandings are often immature, misleading, or fundamentally misconceived; this is certainly the case with many of the protoscientific understandings embraced by young children (p. 9). Gardner makes a valid point about the need for apprenticeships, because of the understandings of young students being immature, misleading, or fundamentally misconceived, within the development of cognitive process of young children and goes on to say, 8
apprenticeships may well be the means of instruction that builds most effectively on the ways in which most young people learn. Such forms of instruction are heavily punctuated with sensorimotor experiences and with the contextualized use of first-order forms of symbolization, such as natural language and simple drawings and gestures (p. 134). This is the basis of early childhood developmentally appropriate practice and an argument can be made about the connection to developmentally appropriate practice and the unique topics being addressed with instructing the conceptualization of moral reasoning through the guise of the GoodWork Toolkit and the understanding of ethics, excellence, and engagement. Recent research, in A Developmental Approach to Educating young Children by Denise H. Daniels and Patricia K. Clarkson (2010), outlines the need for consideration of the whole environment of the young child. Developmental scientists examine connections between the different settings (mesosystems), such as how parents, teachers, and peers relate to one another. Interactions in these multiple settings shape the childs development, and as the child changes, the interactions change. In addition, researchers consider how elements of the broader social and cultural contexts affect these interactions (exo- and macrosystems not shown), for example, how the No Child Left Behind Act influences school practices, and in turn, teacher-child interactions in the classroom (p. 10). This excerpt shows the need, when thinking about early childhood development, to take into account the whole environment. In the classroom, developmentally appropriate 9
practice with early childhood development needs to be focused in a learner-centered classroom. According to Daniels and Clarkson, learner (child)-centered practices are educational practices based on understanding of developmental and psychological processes. [It] involves the teacher assuming a facilitator or partner role and encouraging children to take responsibility for their leaning (p. 183). This learner- centered approach to the primary classroom is the basis of the Elementary GoodWork Toolkit. The activities presented to young students within the curriculum of the toolkit, encompass the idea of the teacher being the facilitator and introducing concepts to students, then within the context of small group work, the students are guided in inquiry toward constructing their understanding of the concepts of moral reasoning, ethics, excellence, and engagement. This idea encompasses what Vygotsky called The Zone of Proximal Development- basing instruction on what a child cannot accomplish independently, but with minimal assistance (Lui, 2012). The activities presented range from introductory lesson based around the vocabulary words of ethics, excellence, and engagement with discussion- concepts that are, at the beginning of the discussion, too difficult for young children to comprehend on their own- to students being able to synthesize their understanding of the concepts of moral reasoning and good work to create and author their own ethical narratives. Within this understanding, it is important to consider what researchers such as Roland Tharp, Ron Gallimore, and William Doherty (Daniels & Clarkson, 2010, p. 96) have identified as The Five Standards: 1u
1. Learning is facilitated when teachers and students work together in joint productive activity. 2. Students must develop competence in the language and literacy of instruction. 3. Curriculum must be meaningful, based on previous knowledge, and connected to students lives (e.g., home, community). 4. Learning activities must be challenging, requiring complex thinking. 5. Teachers need to engage children through dialogue, especially instructional conversations (p. 97). The activities presented to students within the toolkit curriculum, is based on these standards, as the teacher facilitates, students are engaged in meaningful, challenging instruction and conversations based on their constructs of the moral world they have been exposed to. It is important to remember, though, that the curriculum of the Elementary GoodWork Toolkit is unique in its topics and concepts being presented to such a young age. Literature that I have reviewed for the purpose of this study has focused on the construction of moral reasoning in students ranging from early childhood to secondary education. All studies have shown compelling research toward the need for a set curriculum, but I have not found any set curriculum to facilitate this. Cath Milvain outlines a program to teach moral reasoning in the primary school setting in his paper Moral Reasoning as Part of a Primary School Programme (1997). Milvain outlines what he would like to include in a curriculum to address moral reasoning: I looked at establishing a classroom programme which combined elements suggested above: Development of processes of rational reasoning 11
Engagement in Socratic dialogue Recognition of the conceptual inadequacies of the lower level of understanding Adoption of a higher, more rationally defensible conceptual level The aim was for students to explore realistic, or probable, circumstances depicted in picture story books through philosophical dialogue in a community of inquiry (p. 19). Milvains ideas are similar to the basis of instruction of the toolkit. The curriculum presented in this paper aims to develop thinking and reasoning skills, engage students in dialogue, and a higher level of critical thinking skills surrounding the development of moral reasoning and the synthesis of the ideas of ethics, excellence, and en Methodology and work plan I began writing curriculum describing the 3 Es to young children, the thought about the abstract concept of ethics, excellence, and engagement was in the forefront of our minds with thinking about one simple question: Will young children really be able to visualize these concepts? To begin, I decided to create narratives of the 3 Es from the perspective of a young child using authentic classroom situations from our past experiences (see Appendix A). The first one I wrote was the narrative for engagement. I planned the lessons for my classroom stemming from this narrative using a discussion surrounding concepts that they would encounter in their own lives. After I read the narrative in class, I expected that I would need more schema building around this concept, but my students surprised me by how quickly they picked !"#$%& ( 12
up on the connection between liking what youre learning about, what theyre good at, and engagement (Figure 1). From there, using the connections that the students had made, I continued with the discussions of excellence and ethics. At the end of each introductory lesson of one of the 3 Es (Appendix B), we created a concept map or a word map. I began using word-mapping activities to research definitions and meanings for each of the 3 Es and then construct a word web of their understanding. According to the organization Reading Rockets, a word map is a visual organizer that promotes vocabulary development (Reading Rockets, 2012). Word maps are used in classrooms to assist students in understanding abstract words and concepts. The use of word mapping in this activity allows students to construct a spatial mental model of the content being presented (Hegarty, Stull 2012). For students first encountering a complex concept such as Good Work, visuospatial thinking provides a means for grasping the concept that is accessible and age-appropriate for students. As I mentioned, the students in my classroom engage in a word mapping activity to help them further explore their understandings of Good Work terminology. I was able to develop a webquest (lesson plan is found in Appendix C and online- http://questgarden.com/146/51/5/120716111216/) for student use and to assist in keeping a structured eye on the content being searched. The webquest and modeling leads the students to work in small groups to research multiple definitions of excellence, ethics and engagement and jot down notes of their thoughts surrounding what they were discovering. From there, the small groups of students are asked to turn their thoughts into word maps- creating a visual representation of their thoughts- the goal being a series of 1S
connected words surrounding each one of the 3Es. Figure 2 is an example of a student groups word map. In this example, when these young students were faced with the task of creating their own thoughts surrounding these complex ideas, they were at first apprehensive. For many, this was their first independent experience with exploring a concept using the Internet. Through continued discussion during the activity, I supported their research by guiding questions, Can you make a personal connection to words? Are there any group members that have a different connection? Students were given the opportunity to discuss their experiences and explorations with each other; they were able to learn about multiple perspectives and eventually, they moved beyond their initial hesitations. At this young age, the students have had success in constructing meanings through guided partnership discussion and activities. The students have been able to find clear connections between themselves and others, discuss the meaning of true social and academic success, and begin to become excited about their future possibilities. Visuospatial thinking skills are an essential part of a young childs development. In giving students the opportunity to work on this development through discussion and activities, students are able to utilize their creative thinking to construct meaning of vocabulary as related to Good Work. Next, the students engage in an activity where they are encouraged and exposed to identifying the characteristics of ethics, excellence, and engagement in real world situations- specifically a video of students in the country of Bhutan working with the !"#$%& ) 14
Design for Change initiative (Appendix D). Linda Elder and Richard Paul describe the practice of recognizing learning in different settings and situations leading to becoming a practicing thinker in what they describe as the stages of thinking (2013). According to Elder and Paul, students go through stages of thinking: The Unreflective Thinker, The Challenged Thinker, The Beginning Thinker, The Practicing Thinker, The Advanced Thinker, and The Accomplished Thinker. In the Practicing Thinker stage, students should now be developing the habit whenever they are trying to figure something out of focusing on: purpose, question, information, inferences, assumptions, concepts, point of view, and implications. The result of this emphasis in instruction is that students begin to see connections between all the subject matter they are learning (Elder and Paul, 2013). The practice of using a real life video to discuss the concepts of GoodWork helps the students to focus on the skills described above, see figure 3 for an audio recording of student discussions. Following the discussion of GoodWork in the real world, students are exposed to a web-based game where they can focus on using their knowledge of ethics, excellence, and engagement to make informed decisions in a role playing scenario. Quandary Game was developed by Learning Games Network to provide children ages 8-14 with a forum to experience making ethical decisions in scenarios that dont have a right or wrong answer (see the lesson plan in appendix E). From my experience, in implementing this activity, the students are engaged in this kind of activity because they feel empowered as leaders. I notice that with young children, especially, being given the !"#$%& * !"#$%& + !"#$%& ,- 1S
opportunity to put their knowledge into practice, they feel a sense of accomplishment. With the use of Quandary game (see figure 4 for a screen shot of the game) and class discussion and debriefing (figure 4a), students are given a controlled environment to practice their application of GoodWork themes. Finally, this work leads to the writing of student ethical narratives with a partner and posting them as blogs. Each lesson set is assessed using rubrics developed specifically for the said lesson set for teachers to monitor student understanding through the process of discussing the 3 Es. I also have developed a pre and post on-demand assessment (appendix F) that the students are given prior to the conversation starting and also after the conversation has culminated to gage student understanding and growth in critical thinking surrounding the synthesis of ethics, excellence, and engagement- this is the point of discussion of this study. The Study The context of this study surrounds looking at the progress young students make in developing their understandings of the terms ethics, excellence, and engagement- the basis of The GoodWork Toolkit curricula. After developing the curricula used to teach young students about the importance character education concepts of self-reflection of good work, it is clear that there is a necessity to analyze student understanding- mainly, are students able to synthesize the information they have learned about community citizenship and good work by recognize the implication and characteristics through a literary guise? This study has been conducted in a first and second grade, single teacher, multiage classroom with 18 students at a small charter school, Unity Charter School, in 16
Morristown, New Jersey. Unity Charter School pulls from 47 sending districts, with 39% of the population coming from the Morris School District. Nineteen of the 196 students at Unity are special education classified, 14.7%. The students in the class range from ages 6 to 8 and come to Unity from many different cultural and socio-economic backgrounds and varying abilities. The reading levels of the students range from a DRA (Developmental Reading Assessment) level 10 (first grade) to 40 (fourth grade) with 0.04% of the class classified as needing accommodations. The situation of the students in this particular class, as pertaining to their knowledge of the GoodWork Toolkit, is unique- 23% of the population is in their second year of working with the ideas and content of The GoodWork Toolkit. These five students are going into this study with a base understanding of the concepts of ethics, excellence, and engagement and are designated with an asterisk in the data.
Data Collection The data that has been collected and analyzed comes from a pre and post on- demand writing assessment (Appendix F) specifically looks at three realms of student learning- relationships and role models, individual background, expertise, beliefs, and values, and responsibility- through student writing based on their reflections of the treatment of the main character in Chrysanthemum by Kevin Henkes. The students are first read the story with no discussion from the teacher, then students are asked and expected to write about: What do you think about what happened in the story? Can you write about your feelings about this story? How do you think Chrysanthemum feels about her name now? Why?
17
As noted above, the pre and post on-demand writing assessment is designed to provide a concrete assessment measure to gage student creation of understanding about GoodWork- therefore the assessment was given before lessons and discussions begin and, for the purposes of this study, upon culmination of the initial introduction of the concepts of GoodWork. The use of the same pre- and post-assessment is rooted in the idea that the reliability of data obtained from an assessment is evident in how consistently the assessment produces the same information about a child (Moon p. 227). This being said, the assessment that has been created asks students to use the information they have gained about the concepts of good work in reflecting about a potential real-world situation they may face. The students are expected to be able to use their synthesis of the ideas to discuss this dilemma and their reflections about how Chrysanthemum is treated. For the purpose of this study, the time of the curriculum follows a strict time line. Day 1: Pre-assessment is given Day 2-4: Introduction to Student Engagement Lesson (appendix B) Day 5-6: Introduction to Excellence Lesson (appendix B) Day 7-9: Introduction to Ethics Lesson (appendix B) Day 10-16: Word Mapping/Webquest Activity (appendix C) Day 17: Post-assessment is given
18
The findings Upon analysis of the results of the pre- and post-assessments, it is clear that the majority of students begin to gain an understanding of the theories of good work and moral reasoning. I chose to separate the three content strands and analyze each one individually for student understanding. First, lets look at the students understanding of the importance of peer/adult relationships and the role of these individuals as role models (strand one). During the pre-assessment (figure 5), the data showed an overwhelming lack of knowledge about the role of peers/adults in a successful classroom environment. Many students responses, 72%, showed an understanding of how the treatment of Chrysanthemum affects their feelings, but were unable to discuss the role of the peers/adults in the situation. For example, student LS commented that I feel bad when the other kids made fun of her (Appendix G). This response shows that this student is able to understand how negative treatment of a classmate or peer affects herself, but does not understand the role of the peer/adult in standing up for one another. Upon completion of the activities and discussions about good work and ethics, excellence, and engagement, this particular student showed a response that demonstrates her understanding of the role of the peers and adults in Chrysanthemums social/emotional state, I felt really good when Miss Twinkle said that !"#$%& + 19
she was named after a flower too and she made Chrysanthemum feel better and I like how Chrysanthemums mom and dad tried to make Chrysanthemum feel better and if I was Chrysanthemum Ill say to the bullies treat others the way you want to be treated (Appendix H). The second strand looks at the students understanding of the individuals background, expertise, beliefs, and values, asking students to comment on how the main character, Chrysanthemum feels about the situation. During the pre-assessment, 88% of the student did not comment on this strand (figure 6). One example, student ZH, stated, I felt sad when Victoria, Jo, and Rita made fun of Chrysanthemum because its not nice to make fun of some one (Appendix I). This response doesnt speak about how Chrysanthemum potentially feels and this characters background, but shows the development of a 7 year old by speaking only of their own feelings. This strand is looking for the student to speak about how someone else may experience a situation, seeing the situation from someone elses shoes. This particular students post- assessment showed improvement in strand two by discussing how she felt about Chrysanthemums change in understanding, at the end, I felt happy for Chrysanthemum because she knew her name was absolutely perfect and Chrysanthemum was happy! (Appendix J). Over all, 50% of students understanding of strand two improved by at least one point from the pre- to the post-assessment. Strand three focuses on an individuals responsibility to create a positive environment within the social realm. When responding on the pre- and post-assessment and the story of Chrysanthemum, students are expected to comment on how Chrysanthemums peers and teachers can support each other. As you can see from the data chart (figure 7), there 2u
was a wide arrange of improvement/ lack of improvement in understanding of community responsibility when discussing good work. The data shows that many students developed a fair understanding of their role and potential impact on the classroom community as a whole. For example, student NL, did not comment on strand three in the response, I liked the story because I like mice and flowers and I am a girl of course (appendix K). This response shows that this student understands what is being asked of them- to respond about their feelings of the story- but doesnt understand the concepts of good work. After engaging in the activities and discussions of the portions of the curriculum presented, this same student was able to show a full understanding of the individual responsibility and implications on the classroom community, I think Chrysanthemum would feel happy if I stood up for her when Rita, Jo, and Victoria teased her (appendix L).
Results and Discussion In the previous section, I highlighted the successful students experiences with the pre- and post-assessments in particular strands, but based on the students overall scores on the assessments, the findings of this study show that many students need more work with activities and discussions based around the concepts of ethics, excellence, and !"#$%& . 21
engagement (figure 8). I believe that with more experiences surrounding the conscious reflection and discussion of ethics, excellence, and engagement, many student would be able to fully show their understanding of moral reasoning in relation to their individual conscious and their responsibility to the community. As outlined in the curriculum described in the Methodology and Work Plan, I will continue this study for the duration of this school year by implementing the activities of the Bhutan video discussion, use of Quandary game by the Learning Network, and culminating narrative writing activity. I propose conducting the narrative writing activity with a partner class who is also involved in the conversation of good work. The lesson plan that is found in Appendix M outlines the discussion of ethics, excellence, and engagement along with using the website called Ensemble to distantly write ethical narratives with students located in another part of the world. This work will culminate in June with a final activity of the same on-demand writing prompt based around Chrysanthemum by Kevin Henkes. The hope of this study is to bring to light, for other teachers and educators, the potential of young student understanding of the important concept of good work and moral reasoning. For students to successfully and morally conduct themselves later in life !"#$%& / 22
in the digital age, it is necessary for them to develop an understanding and conscious self reflection about what it means to been a community citizen, the essential, over-arching question of this curriculum. Through the implementation of the Elementary GoodWork curriculum, students are given the opportunity to begin formulating their understanding of the importance of moral reasoning in social and individual situations.
2S
References Biesta, G. , (2011). Philosophy, Exposure, and children: How to Resist the Instrumentalisation of Philosophy in Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 45 (2), pp.305 319
Daniels, D. & Clarkson, P. , (2010). A Developmental Approach to Educating Young Children. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Division 15 (Educational Psychology) of the APA.
Frederiksen N., (1984). Implications of Cognitive Theory of Instruction in Problem Solving. Review of Educational Research. 54 (3), pp.363-407.
Gardner, H. , (1991). The Unschooled Mind: How Children Think and How Schools Should Teach. 1st ed. NY: Basic Books.
Gilliom, M. Eugine, (1981). Global Education and the Social Studies. Theory into Practice. 20 (2), pp.169 - 173
Hannam, P. & Echeverria, E., (2009). Philosophy with Teenagers: Nurturing a Moral Imagination for the 21st Century. 1st ed. NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Hegarty, M., & Stull, A., (2012). 'Visuospatial Reasoning'. In: Holyoak, K., & Morrison, R. (ed), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press. pp.606 - 630.
Kim, M. & Sankey, D. , (2009). Toward a Dynamic Systems Approach to moral development and moral education: a response to the JME Special Issue, September 2008. Journal of Moral Education. 38 (3), pp.283 - 298
Lui, Angela (2012). Teaching in the Zone: An introduction to working within the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD to drive effective early childhood instruction. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.childrensprogress.com/wp- content/uploads/2012/05/free-white-paper-vygotsky-zone-of-proximal- development-zpd-early-childhood.pdf. [Last Accessed 10 December, 2013].
Marzano, Robert J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Educational Research Laboratory. Retrieved June 28, 2013, from http://www.mcrel.org/PDF/Instruction/5982RR_InstructionMeta_Analysis.pdf
Milvain, C., (1997). Moral Reasoning as Part of a Primary Programme. Analytic Teaching. 17 (1), pp.17 - 28
24
Appendix A
Ethics Narrative Maria is a third-grader and one time her friend, Belinda called her Messy Maria when they were working on a project at school. Other classmates were in their group and the project was to do research and find facts about where the water came from that comes out of the water faucet in the classroom. Marias research folder was raggedy and her papers were usually just shoved into the folder so they always looked wrinkled. Maria wanted to have everything neat and tidy like her friend Belinda, but she was always in a hurry to clean up. Maria always felt like she was being told to hurry up by everyone. Belinda has been her friend since kindergarten and Maria liked that she helped her to hurry up and clean up- this made Maria feel like Belinda really cared about her. But since theyve been in 3 rd grade, Maria feels like Belinda has started picking on her. After she called her Messy Maria, everyone else in the class started calling her that name too. Maria thinks that Belinda is bossy and feels like calling her Bossy Belinda to get back at her. Maybe the kids will start calling her that too and she would know how it would feel to be called something that others laugh about.
One day, Marias mom asked her if she would like to invite Belinda to go to the beach with them in the morning. Maria thought about it for a moment and said, no, I dont want to be friends with Belinda anymore. Marias mom was confused and asked Maria to tell her why. Maria explained how Belinda was bossing her around and Marias mom was surprised, the girls had always seemed like such good friends. Marias mom reminded her of the conversation they had had after reading Clara and the Bossy by Ruth Ohi. Maria and her mom had talked about how its okay to let your friend know how you feel in a polite way, to be the bigger person.
So the next week at school, Maria and Belinda were working on a project together when Belinda started picking on Maria and bossing her around. What would you do?
Excellence Narrative Alex is in third grade and he is a very good soccer player for someone who is 9 years old. He has heard adults say this about him. His soccer coach and the Phys Ed teacher at school always tell Alex that he is a natural athlete. Alex is not sure what that means, except that it must mean hes good at sports. He is glad that they tell him that because everyone seems happy that he plays sports, especially soccer and that he scores a lot of goals during a season. His traveling soccer team just won the state championship in their age level and he was awarded the Excellent Player award.
Alex likes soccer, but he doesnt have to try very hard at it to score goals. Alex also likes school and is really interested in the science unit they are doing right now about animal habitats. Hes so glad that soccer season is over for a couple of months so that he can play outside with his friends when he is home from school. One of his favorite things to do is to go down by the little creek near his house and turn over rocks to see what creatures live underneath. So when his class started exploring the habitats that were in their state, he was excited that his teacher let him work on researching the woodlands 2S
habitat. The problem for Alex was that he had to present what he learned about his habitat to his class, and Alex never was very excellent in making things with his hands. His friend Chris was also researching the woodlands habitat and so they decided to work together. Chris showed Alex how to use the software for their class smartboard to create pages with photos and facts that they learned from searching the web. Alex worked for hours at school and at home to find photos and facts about the animals found in woodland habitats and Chris did the research for the kinds of trees and flowers. Alex created 5 great pages about the five most common animals found in the woods of their state. They were the first partners to present their habitat. They stood at the smartboard and made their presentation. When they were done, everyone cheered and clapped and the teacher had the other second grade classes come in and see their presentation. She told the other partner groups that Alex and Chriss presentation was excellent and that it was a great model of the kinds of presentations shes hoping to see from the other groups. Alex was so proud! When he was talking to his grandma about what the teacher had said and how happy he felt, she told him that he was feeling proud because he did an excellent job on something he worked really hard at.
Guiding Questions: What is something that you are really great at doing? How do you know ? What is something that you are OK at doing? How do you know ? What is something that you are not good at doing? How do you know ? Who do you know that is excellent at doing something? How do you know ?
Engagement Narrative Before he was in second grade, Kyle never liked school. He didnt think he was very good at it. Thats what his older sisters had always told him. His kindergarten and first grade teachers said his name a lot and they seemed to really want him to be able to read books and to write words in his journals and for stories. His kindergarten and first grade teachers said his name a lot- Kyle knew he was probably not very liked. Kyle also felt that his teachers really wanted him to be able to read and write and so did he, but they never let him write about what he wanted to. Kyle wanted to read and write about baseball. When he wasnt in school, he watched and played baseball a lot. His sister even found a baseball game on the computer that he played whenever one of them would let him use the computer. His favorite team was the Boston Red Socks and he knew all of the players names and batting averages. He loved to learn everything about the other teams too. When he saw his Dad on the weekends, they played baseball and went to games and his Dad was one of the coaches for his town team. In the winter, his Dad took him to batting cages and this winter they are going to Florida to see some games during Spring Training.
School changed for Kyle in second grade. He went to a new school and his teacher listened to him and found out right away how much he liked baseball. At first, Kyle was still acting like he didnt like school, but then the very first time that his teacher read with him it was a book about baseball. Over the next few weeks, the teacher showed Kyle that he knew how to read and write a lot of baseball words. Kyles teacher was really good at 26
showing him lots of school things that he could do. In fact, she worked hard to find books for him to read about baseball--stories about kids who played baseball and real stories about baseball players. She even let him talk about baseball at morning meeting and it turned out that there were a group of his class friends that also loved baseball. She let them form a club that she called a book club. When they had to do a research project, she let them all work together and research the size of a professional baseball field and then they made a scale model of one. One day, when he was working with a friend, measuring the infield of their scale model, Kyle looked up at his teacher and said, I love you, Ms. H. His teacher said she loved him too, but that she thought the happy feeling he was having was because he was having fun while he was learning!
Lesson Cverv|ew 1hls lesson ls deslgned Lo connecL Lhe 3 L's of Lhe CoodWork ro[ecL (engagemenL, eLhlcs, and excellence). SLudenLs wlll have Lhe opporLunlLy Lo explore eLhlcs and frlendshlp. Ethics is what you believe makes you a good friend, brother or sister, or classmate. Ethics is being with others and respecting whoever youre with so that everyone is working together in a happy way to get things done.
Number of C|ass er|ods: Lhree-40 mlnuLe perlods
Standards State Standards (2009) 6.1.l.A.J- clvlcs, Covetomeot, ooJ nomoo klqbts uemonsLraLe approprlaLe behavlor when collaboraLlng wlLh oLhers. 6.J.4.A.J- Actlve cltlzeosblp lo tbe 21 st ceototy SelecL a local lssue and develop a group acLlon plan Lo lnform school and/or communlLy members abouL Lhe lssue. 9.1.4.A.1- ctltlcol 1blokloq ooJ ltoblem 5olvloq 8ecognlze a problem and bralnsLorm ways Lo solve Lhe problem lndlvldually or collaboraLlvely. 9.1.4.A.2- ctltlcol 1blokloq ooJ ltoblem 5olvloq LvaluaLe avallable resources LhaL can asslsL ln solvlng problems. 9.1.4.8.1- ctltlcol 1blokloq ooJ ltoblem 5olvloq arLlclpaLe ln bralnsLormlng sesslons Lo seek lnformaLlon, ldeas, and sLraLegles LhaL fosLer creaLlve Lhlnklng.
Nat|ona| Standards (2012) 27
keoJloq. lltetotote key lJeos ooJ uetolls CtoJe 2 1. Ask and answer such quesLlons as who, whaL, where, when, why, and how Lo demonsLraLe undersLandlng of key ldeas and deLalls ln a LexL. keoJloq. lltetotote key lJeos ooJ uetolls CtoJe 2 3. uescrlbe how characLers ln a sLory respond Lo ma[or evenLs and challenges. 5peokloq ooJ llsteoloq comptebeosloo ooJ collobototloo CtoJe 2 1. arLlclpaLe ln collaboraLlve conversaLlons wlLh dlverse parLners abouL grade 2 Loplcs and LexLs wlLh peers and adulLs ln small and larger groups. 5peokloq ooJ llsteoloq lteseototloo of koowleJqe ooJ lJeos CtoJe 2 6. roduce compleLe senLences wlLh approprlaLe Lo Lask and slLuaLlon ln order Lo provlde requesLed deLall or clarlflcaLlon.
LfS Standards (add performance |nd|cators and narrat|ves |f app||cab|e) n. Moltlple letspectlves 7. Pow can l undersLand and work wlLh oLhers Lo achleve a common goal?
Lssent|a| uest|on: WhaL makes a good communlLy?
Gu|d|ng uest|ons: WhaL does CoodWork mean Lo you? Can you Lhlnk of any examples of someLhlng you would call CoodWork? Why ls CoodWork lmporLanL? WhaL does eLhlcs mean? WhaL does Lhe word enemy" mean Lo you? Why do you Lhlnk chlldren have enemles? Why was !eremy 8oss on hls enemy llsL"? WhaL dld Lhe boy learn from spendlng Lhe enLlre day wlLh hls number one enemy? Pow dld he manage Lo Lurn hls enemy lnLo a frlend? Pow can we help Lhe communlLy?
kesources]mater|a|s for th|s |esson: LLhlcs narraLlve Lnemy le by uerek Munson (elLher on 1umblebooks or paper copy) lrlendshlp le reclpe sheeL (see below) ur. ueSoLo by Wllllam SLelg CharL paper
Learn|ng Cpportun|t|es, Act|v|t|es, and rocedures: Day 1: 8ead Lo Lhe sLudenL Lhe LLhlcs narraLlve found below. Ask Lhe sLudenL whaL Lhey Lhlnk eLhlcs means- dlscuss wlLh Lhe sLudenLs how belng an eLhlcal person means you are a good frlend, famlly member, and classmaLe. Pelp Lhe sLudenLs see Lhe 28
connecLlon beLween good clLlzenshlp, excellence, engagemenL, and eLhlcs. Cnce Lhe connecLlon ls made, ask WhaL does CoodWork mean Lo you? 1hen, Lell sLudenLs LhaL, ln Lhlnklng abouL eLhlcs, a reclpe for creaLlng greaL frlends wlll be made. Ask sLudenLs Lo help bralnsLorm lngredlenLs for a secreL reclpe for creaLlng greaL frlends. 1hen, read Lhe book Lnemy le by uerek Munson (or show lL vla 1umblebooks on Lhe lnLerneL). Cnce flnlshed readlng, ask Lhe sLudenLs: o WhaL does Lhe word enemy" mean Lo you? o Why do you Lhlnk chlldren have enemles? o Why was !eremy 8oss on hls enemy llsL"? o WhaL dld Lhe boy learn from spendlng Lhe enLlre day wlLh hls number one enemy? o Pow dld he manage Lo Lurn hls enemy lnLo a frlend? o uo you Lhlnk LhaL Lhey wlll sLay frlends? o WhaL does Lhe word frlend" mean Lo you? Show sLudenLs a charL wlLh an example of a reclpe for lrlendshlp le". ulscuss wlLh Lhe sLudenLs how Lhelr ldeas abouL belng a good frlend and Lhe ldeas Lhey have been comlng up wlLh durlng Lhls unlL wlll help Lo gulde Lhem lnLo Lhe perfecL reclpe for frlendshlp ple. SpllL sLudenLs lnLo small groups, glve Lhem a reclpe sheeL (aLLached) and ask Lhem Lo creaLe Lhelr own lrlendshlp le" reclpe uslng Leamwork. Pang sLudenL work ln Lhe hall.
Day 2: ulscuss wlLh sLudenLs Lhelr ldeas abouL eLhlcs and frlends from Lhe prevlous day. 8ead Lo Lhe sLudenLs Lhe book, ur. ueSoLo by Wllllam SLelg. Ask Lhe sLudenLs Lo descrlbe how ur. ueSoLo behaved eLhlcally. 1ogeLher, make a llsL of way we, as sLudenLs, can asslsL and help ln Lhe communlLy- why? Can people have frlends ln Lhe communlLy LhaL Lhey don'L know very well? Look aL our ldeas for whaL Lhe word frlend" means Lo us from yesLerday-do some of Lhose words descrlbe how we mlghL do frlendly Lhlngs for people ln our communlLy? (make a llsL of words LhaL descrlbe how we show frlendshlp ln our communlLy.) Day 3: 8emlnd Lhe sLudenLs of Lhelr llsL from Lhe prevlous day abouL how we can help Lhe communlLy. SpllL Lhe sLudenLs lnLo small groups and ask Lhem Lo Lhlnk abouL Lhelr suggesLlons on how we can help Lhe communlLy and Lo also Lhlnk abouL Lhlngs wlLhln Lhe communlLy LhaL concern Lhem. Cne sLudenL from each Leam wlll share Lhelr llsL wlLh Lhe class. WrlLe all ldeas for each communlLy on Lhe board. 29
Co Lhrough Lhe llsL and have sLudenLs make suggesLlons for soluLlons Lo Lhelr concern- connecLlng concerns Lo helplng. Lmphaslze dlscusslng Lhe commons and ensurlng lL's Lhrlvlng. 1ogeLher, declde on one lssue Lhe class would llke Lo work on solvlng. Make a llsL of soluLlons. ueslgn a plan.
Instruct|ona|]Lnv|ronmenta| Mod|f|cat|ons]D|fferent|ated Strateg|es Small group lnsLrucLlon serves as a scaffold
LfS Assessment]Scor|ng Cr|ter|a WhaL do l need Lo collecL or admlnlsLer Lo prove LhaL sLudenLs have grown Lowards and/or achleved deslred ouLcomes/sLandards? WhaL crlLerla wlll l use Lo assess/evaluaLe sLudenL work?
*** |ease see kU8kIC LfS/SLaLe SLandard (name) LfS/SLaLe erformance lndlcaLor (leLLer and number) LfS/SLaLe AssessmenL lnsLrumenL LfS/SLaLe Scorlng CrlLerla Clvlcs, CovernmenL, and Puman 8lghLs 6.1..A.3 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo collaboraLe LogeLher? AcLlve ClLlzenshlp ln Lhe 21 sL
CenLury 6.3.4.A.3 1eacher CbservaLlon Servlce Learnlng ro[ecL CrlLlcal 1hlnklng and roblem Solvlng 9.1.4.A.1 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo collaboraLe LogeLher? CrlLlcal 1hlnklng and roblem Solvlng 9.1.4.A.2 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo collaboraLe LogeLher? CrlLlcal 1hlnklng and roblem Solvlng 9.1.4.8.1 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo collaboraLe LogeLher? 8eadlng: LlLeraLure key ldeas and C2. 1 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo respond Lo LexL? Su
ueLalls 8eadlng: LlLeraLure key ldeas and ueLalls C2. 3 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo respond Lo LexL? Speaklng and LlsLenlng Comprehenslon and CollaboraLlon C2. 1 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs able Lo collaboraLe wlLh oLhers approprlaLely? Speaklng and LlsLenlng knowledge and ldeas C2. 6 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs uslng approprlaLe convenLlons ln conversaLlon? MulLlple erspecLlves P 7 1eacher CbservaLlon Are sLudenLs abouL Lo collaboraLe wlLh oLhers Lo plan Lhe servlce pro[ecL? S1
L1PlCS nA88A1lvL Motlo ls o tbltJ-qtoJet ooJ ooe tlme bet ftleoJ, 8elloJo colleJ bet Messy Motlo wbeo tbey wete wotkloq oo o ptoject ot scbool. Otbet clossmotes wete lo tbelt qtoop ooJ tbe ptoject wos to Jo teseotcb ooJ floJ focts oboot wbete tbe wotet come ftom tbot comes oot of tbe wotet foocet lo tbe closstoom. Motlos teseotcb folJet wos toqqeJy ooJ bet popets wete osoolly jost sboveJ loto tbe folJet so tbey olwoys lookeJ wtlokleJ. Motlo wooteJ to bove evetytbloq oeot ooJ tlJy llke bet ftleoJ 8elloJo, bot sbe wos olwoys lo o botty to cleoo op. Motlo olwoys felt llke sbe wos beloq tolJ to botty op by evetyooe. 8elloJo bos beeo bet ftleoJ sloce kloJetqotteo ooJ Motlo llkeJ tbot sbe belpeJ bet to botty op ooJ cleoo op- tbls moJe Motlo feel llke 8elloJo teolly coteJ oboot bet. 8ot sloce tbeyve beeo lo J tJ qtoJe, Motlo feels llke 8elloJo bos stotteJ plckloq oo bet. Aftet sbe colleJ bet Messy Motlo, evetyooe else lo tbe closs stotteJ collloq bet tbot oome too. Motlo tbloks tbot 8elloJo ls bossy ooJ feels llke collloq bet 8ossy 8elloJo to qet bock ot bet. Moybe tbe klJs wlll stott collloq bet tbot too ooJ sbe woolJ koow bow lt woolJ feel to be colleJ sometbloq tbot otbets looqb oboot, bot Motlo koew tbot sbe woolJot Jo lt.
Ooe Joy, Motlos mom oskeJ bet lf sbe woolJ llke to lovlte 8elloJo to qo to tbe beocb wltb tbem lo tbe motoloq. Motlo tbooqbt oboot lt fot o momeot ooJ solJ, oo, l Joot woot to be ftleoJs wltb 8elloJo ooymote. Motlos mom wos coofoseJ ooJ oskeJ Motlo to tell bet wby. Motlo exploloeJ bow 8elloJo wos bossloq bet otoooJ ooJ Motlos mom wos sotptlseJ, tbe qltls boJ olwoys seemeJ llke socb qooJ ftleoJs. Motlos mom temloJeJ bet of tbe coovetsotloo tbey boJ boJ oftet teoJloq cloto ooJ tbe 8ossy by kotb Obl. Motlo ooJ bet mom boJ tolkeJ oboot bow lts okoy to let yoot ftleoJ koow bow yoo feel lo o pollte woy, to be tbe blqqet petsoo.
5o tbe oext week ot scbool, Motlo ooJ 8elloJo wete wotkloq oo o ptoject toqetbet wbeo 8elloJo stotteJ plckloq oo Motlo ooJ bossloq bet otoooJ.
Mlx Lwo quarLs of respecL SLlr ln 3 Lablespoonfuls of smlles for our classmaLes Add one cup of sharlng SLlr ln Lhree gallons of compllmenLs Mlx one llLer of llsLenlng Lo our frlends SLlr ln 2 cups of Laklng Lurns 8ake aL 323 for 43 mln. CuL lnLo 23 sllces and share wlLh your class SS
Advanced rof|c|ent 8as|c 1eamwork 6.1..A.3 9.1.4.A.1 9.1.4.A.2 9.1.4.8.1 SLCCC21 P.7 AcLlvely collaboraLes Lo seeks and suggesLs soluLlons Lo problems. CollaboraLes Lo lmprove on soluLlons suggesLed by oLher group members. uoes noL parLlclpaLe. ConvenLlons of Speaklng and LlsLenlng SLCCC21 SLklC26 uemonsLraLes convenLlons of a proflclenL llsLener and speaker wlLh flexlblllLy approprlaLe Lo audlence and purpose uses approprlaLe pragmaLlc feaLures of dlscourse and senLence sLrucLure and grammar errors are mlnor. uoes noL use Lngllsh language convenLlons. 1hlnklng AbouL 1exL 8LkluC21 8LkluC23 8esponds wlLh lnslghL Lo LexL. 8esponds Lo LexL on Lhe surface level uoes noL parLlclpaLe. Servlce Learnlng 6.3.4.A.3 P7 SLudenL ls able Lo share, produce, and reflecL on servlce lndlvldually and wlLh group members. SLudenL ls able Lo share, produce, and reflecL wlLh group members only. uoes noL parLlclpaLe.
S4
Grade: 1/2 multiage Unit: Citizenship in the classroom and community Lesson: The Good Work project- Engagement
Lesson Overview This lesson is designed to begin the conversation with young children about being engaged in what they are learning. Engagement is when you care about and are really interested in the work you are doing and what youre learning. Engagement feels like happy or joyful learning.
Number of Class Periods: three 40-minute periods
Standards New Jersey State Standards (2009) 21 st Century Life and Career Skills o A: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving- 9.1.4.A.5 Apply critical thinking and problem-solving skills in classroom and family settings. o B: Creativity and Innovation- 9.1.4.B.1 Participate in brainstorming sessions to seek information, ideas, and strategies that foster creative thinking. o C: Collaboration, Teamwork, and Leadership- 9.1.4.C.1 Practice collaborative skills in groups, and explain how these skills assist in completing tasks in different settings. o D: Cross- Cultural Understanding and Interpersonal Communication ! 9.1.4.D.1 Use effective oral and written communication in face-to-face and online interactions and when presenting to an audience, ! 9.1.4.D.2 Express needs, wants, and feelings, appropriately in various situations.
National Standards (2012) Language Arts- Reading: Literature o Key Ideas and Details- Grade 2. 3. Describe how characters in a story respond to major events and challenges. Speaking and Listening- Comprehension and Collaboration- Grade 2 1. Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about grade 2 topics and texts with peers and adults in small and larger groups.
EfS Standards (add performance indicators and narratives if applicable) ! I: Sense of Place 22. Engage in goal setting/future visioning.
Essential Question: What makes a good community? SS
Guiding Questions: Why do you think its important to like what you are learning about? How can we help each other be engaged in what we are learning? What expertise do you have to teach your peers? Why is it important to understand your likes and dislikes? What can you do if youre feeling un-engaged? What does GoodWork mean to you? Can you think of any examples of something you would call GoodWork Why is GoodWork important?
Resources/materials for this lesson: Crayons and/or colored pencils Pencils Altogether Me (student working sheet) Altogether Us (Venn diagram working sheet) Book: The Ok Book by Amy Kraus Rosenthal
Learning Opportunities, Activities, and Procedures: Day 1: Read the students the Engagement narrative from The Good Work Project (see below). The narrative is about a young boy who finally finds that he can write and read after discovering his love of baseball. After reading the story to the students, ask- Why do you think its important to like what you are learning about? Tell the students that they will be exploring good work as part of their explorations into classroom community. Ask the students, what does GoodWork mean to you? Can you think of any examples of something you would call GoodWork? Why is GoodWork important? Explain to the students that they are going to explore their likes and dislikes and share their findings with their classmates. Discuss with the students the facts they all fill a different role in the classroom. Point out that some may be the expert in baseball, like Kyle from the story, while others may be the expert in adding. Ask students to tell about the different roles they fill in the classroom community. Add all responses to a list entitled, 1/2 expertise. Distribute copies of the Altogether Me sheet and have students draw pictures to show some of the different roles they fill within the classroom community. For help labeling their pictures, students can refer to the list created earlier.
Day 2: Read The Ok Book by Amy Kraus Rosenthal Ask students to refer to the conversation from the previous day and have the students look at their Altogether Me pictures and the list created yesterday. Give students time to finish their Altogether Me sheets if necessary. S6
Arrange students in pairs. Give each pair an Altogether Us Venn Diagram. Have them compare their Altogether Me lists and complete the Venn diagrams. Discuss the results as a class. How can we each help each other be engaged in what we are learning? Think about the person you just worked with, what can you teach them?
Day 3: Explain to the students that today they will be making trading cards about themselves. Ask, why is it important to understand your likes and dislikes? Guide students to connect likes and dislikes with their engagement in the classroom- What can you do if youre feeling unengaged? Discuss with students finding something to like about the topic, whether it be getting help from a friend or using one of their expertise to find the purpose and meaning. Explain that by making trading cards to display in the classroom, the students are creating a way to share their expertise with each other all year. Have each child measure and cut out an index or oaktag card, 2 ! inches by 3 ! inches. Each student should paste his or her photograph on one side of the card. Have children write information about themselves on the backs of the card. Have students decorate the cards. Laminate the cards for longevity. Then, have the students share their cards with one another.
Instructional/Environmental Modifications/Differentiated Strategies Class discussions serve as a modification; teacher examples are provided for visual guidance.
EfS Assessment/Scoring Criteria What do I need to collect or administer to prove that students have grown towards and/or achieved desired outcomes/standards? What criteria will I use to assess/evaluate student work?
EfS/State Standard (name) EfS/State Performance Indicator (letter and number) EfS/State Assessment Instrument EfS/State Scoring Criteria Critical Thinking and Problem Solving 9.1.4.A.5 Teacher Observation Are students able to critically think about ethics and service learning? Creativity and Innovation 9.1.4.B.1 Teacher Observation Are students able to brainstorm collaboratively? Collaboration, Teamwork, and Leadership 9.1.4.C.1 Teacher Observation Are students able to brainstorm collaboratively and work collaboratively S7
Engagement Narrative
Before he was in second grade, Kyle never liked school. He didnt think he was very good at it. Thats what his older sisters had always told him. His kindergarten and first grade teachers said his name a lot and they seemed to really want him to be able to read books and to write words in his journals and for stories. Could this be reworded? Maybe split the sentence up- His kindergarten and first grade teachers said his name a lot- Kyle knew he was probably not very liked. Kyle also felt that his teachers really wanted him to be able to read and write and so did he, but they never let him write about what he wanted to. Kyle wanted to read and write about baseball. When he wasnt in school, he watched and played baseball a lot. His sister even found a baseball game on the on a project? Cross Cultural Understanding and Interpersonal Communication 9.1.4.D.1 Teacher Observation Are students able to communicate their thoughts effectively? Cross Cultural Understanding and Interpersonal Communication 9.1.4.D.2 Teacher Observation Are students able to communicate their thoughts effectively? Reading: Literature RLKID 3 Teacher Observation Are students able to discuss text? Speaking and Listening SLCC 1 Teacher Observation Are students able to communicate their thoughts effectively? Sense of Place I 22 Teacher Observation Are students able to communicate their ideas about the future of the service- learning project? S8
computer that he played whenever one of them would let him use the computer. His favorite team was the Boston Red Socks and he knew all of the players names and batting averages. He loved to learn everything about the other teams too. When he saw his Dad on the weekends, they played baseball and went to games and his Dad was one of the coaches for his town team. In the winter, his Dad took him to batting cages and this winter they are going to Florida to see some games during Spring Training.
School changed for Kyle in second grade. He went to a new school and his teacher listened to him and found out right away how much he liked baseball. At first, Kyle was still acting like he didnt like school, but then the very first time that his teacher read with him it was a book about baseball. Over the next few weeks, the teacher showed Kyle that he knew how to read and write a lot of baseball words. Kyles teacher was really good at showing him lots of school things that he could do. In fact, she worked hard to find books for him to read about baseball--stories about kids who played baseball and real stories about baseball players. She even let him talk about baseball at morning meeting and it turned out that there were a group of his class friends that also loved baseball. She let them form a club that she called a book club. When they had to do a research project, she let them all work together and research the size of a professional baseball field and then they made a scale model of one. One day, when he was working with a friend, measuring the infield of their scale model, Kyle looked up at his teacher and said, I love you, Ms. H. His teacher said she loved him too, but that she thought the happy feeling he was having was because he was having fun while he was learning!
S9
A|together Me
Pere are plcLures and words abouL Lhlngs l llke.
4u
A|together Us Cur names: _________________________________________________________________
SLudenL ls able Lo descrlbe her/hls feellngs abouL good work- WhaL does good work mean Lo you- ln Lhe conLexL of speaklng abouL Lhe group. SLudenL ls able Lo descrlbe her/hls feellng abouL good work ln Lhe conLexL of speaklng abouL herself/hlmself. SLudenL ls unsure or unable Lo express her/hls LhoughLs abouL good work. SLudenL ls unwllllng Lo parLlclpaLe. coo yoo tblok of ooy exomples of sometbloq yoo woolJ coll CooJwotk?
NICCCS 9.1.4.A.S
SLudenL ls able Lo glve aL leasL 3 examples of her/hls percepLlon of good work. SLudenL ls able Lo glve 2 examples of her/hls percepLlon of good work. SLudenL ls able Lo glve 1 example of her/hls percepLlon of good work. SLudenL ls unwllllng Lo parLlclpaLe. wby ls CooJwotk lmpottoot?
LA: k-L kIDG2.1 9.1.4.A.S LfS I 22
SLudenL ls able Lo show hls/her crlLlcal Lhlnklng by explaln why good work ls lmporLanL Lo Lhe classroom communlLy- prlde. SLudenL ls able Lo show hls/her crlLlcal Lhlnklng by explalnlng why good work ls lmporLanL for hlm/her. SLudenL ls beglnnlng Lo undersLand Lhe lmporLance of good work. SLudenL ls unwllllng Lo parLlclpaLe. NICCCS 9.1.4.8.1 9.1.4.C.1 9.1.4.D.1 SLudenL works well and collaboraLe Lo asslsL oLhers ln belng engaged ln learnlng. SLudenL works well wlLh oLhers buL doesn'L asslsL oLhers. SLudenL does noL collaboraLe wlLh peers uslng respecL. SLudenL ls unwllllng Lo parLlclpaLe.
Lesson Cverv|ew 1hls lesson seL beglns Lhe dlscusslon abouL excellence. SLudenLs wlll have Lhe opporLunlLy Lo recognlze excellence ln Lhemselves and Lhelr work. Excellent work is work that youve tried hard on and have done your best. Excellence makes you feel satisfied, proud, and happy.
Number of C|ass er|ods: 2-40 mlnuLe perlods
Standards State Standards (2009) 6.1.l.u.1- nlstoty, coltote, ooJ letspectlves- uescrlbe characLerlsLlcs of oneself, one's famlly, and oLhers. 9.1.4.A.5- ctltlcol 1blokloq ooJ ltoblem 5olvloq- Apply crlLlcal Lhlnklng and problem-solvlng skllls ln Lhe classroom and famlly seLLlngs. 9.1.4.8.1- cteotlvlty ooJ looovotloo- arLlclpaLe ln bralnsLormlng sesslons Lo seek lnformaLlon, ldeas, and sLraLegles LhaL fosLer creaLlve Lhlnklng.
Nat|ona| Standards (2012) keoJloq. lltetotote- CtoJe 2 1. Ask and answer such quesLlons as who, whaL, where, when, why, and how Lo demonsLraLe undersLandlng of key deLalls ln a LexL. keoJloq. lltetotote- CtoJe 2 3. uescrlbe how characLers ln a sLory respond Lo ma[or evenLs and challenges. 5peokloq ooJ llsteoloq- CtoJe 2 1. arLlclpaLe ln collaboraLlve conversaLlons wlLh dlverse parLners abouL grade 2 Loplcs and LexLs wlLh peers and adulLs ln small and larger groups. 5peokloq ooJ llsteoloq- CtoJe 2 3. Ask and answer quesLlons abouL whaL a speaker says ln order Lo clarlfy comprehenslon, gaLher addlLlonal lnformaLlon, or deepen undersLandlng of a Loplc or lssue. 5peokloq ooJ llsteoloq- CtoJe 2 6. roduce compleLe senLences when approprlaLe Lo Lask and slLuaLlon ln order Lo provlde requesLed deLall or clarlflcaLlon.
LfS Standards (add performance |nd|cators and narrat|ves |f app||cab|e) n. Moltlple letspectlves- 4. WhaL are Lhe slmllarlLles and dlfferences beLween myself and oLhers? 4S
n. Moltlple letspectlve- 3. Pow can my dlfferences help me undersLand myself and how can Lhey help oLhers?
Lssent|a| uest|on: WhaL makes a good communlLy?
Gu|d|ng uest|ons: WhaL ls someLhlng LhaL you are really greaL aL dolng? Pow do you know ? WhaL ls someLhlng LhaL you are Ck aL dolng? Pow do you know ? WhaL ls someLhlng LhaL you are noL good aL dolng? Pow do you know ? Who do you know LhaL ls excellenL aL dolng someLhlng? Pow do you know ? WhaL acLlons can you do Lo show excellence? WhaL does CoodWork mean Lo you? Can you Lhlnk of any examples of someLhlng you would call CoodWork? Why ls CoodWork lmporLanL?
kesources]mater|a|s for th|s |esson: CharL paper 8ook- Snowflake 8enLley by !acquellne 8rlggs MarLln CharL made ln prevlous lesson- 1/2 LxperLlse
Learn|ng Cpportun|t|es, Act|v|t|es, and rocedures: uay 1: Ask sLudenLs Lo Lhlnk abouL whaL good work means Lo Lhem and why lL's lmporLanL. 8ead Lhe Lxcellence narraLlve Lo Lhe sLudenLs. ulscuss wlLh Lhe sLudenLs Lhlngs Lhey feel Lhelr experLs" aL. Ask sLudenLs how belng excellenL aL someLhlng connecLs Lo Lhe concepL of good work. ulscuss how you know when someLhlng ls excellenL- when Lhe person has Lrled very hard and has done Lhelr besL work, hence- good work. lnvlLe Lhe sLudenLs Lo refer Lo prevlous conversaLlons durlng Lhe lessons on engagemenL. 8efer Lo Lhe 1/2 LxperLlse" charL made durlng Lhe engagemenL lessons. Ask sLudenLs Lo Lhlnk of a Llme LhaL Lhey Lrled Lhelr hardesL on someLhlng. Add Lhese examples Lo Lhe charL- sLress Lo Lhe sLudenLs LhaL Lrylng your hardesL means showlng excellenL work and experLlse.
uay 2: 8ead Snowflake 8enLley by !acquellne 8rlggs MarLln. AfLer readlng, ask Lhe sLudenLs why 8enLley could be consldered as dolng excellenL work. ulscuss wlLh Lhe sLudenLs how Lhe characLer puL forLh a loL of efforL ln lnvesLlgaLlng someLhlng he loved- snowflakes. 1hen, have sLudenLs Lhlnk abouL someLhlng Lhey would llke Lo lnvesLlgaLe because of Lhelr lnLeresLs. Make a llsL of sLudenL responses- encourage sLudenLs Lo Lhlnk abouL Lhlngs such as wrlLlng, learnlng Lo read, Lhe envlronmenL, eLc. 1bls cbott wlll be soveJ fot Jlscossloos oboot tbe stoJeots petsoool leotoloq ploos (lll). 1hen, ask Lhe sLudenLs Lo Lhlnk abouL how Lhey can be excellenL. Make a charL wlLh Lhe sLudenLs' responses enLlLled- Pow We can be LxcellenL. Ask sLudenLs how excellence shows good work.
44
Instruct|ona|]Lnv|ronmenta| Mod|f|cat|ons]D|fferent|ated Strateg|es Croup dlscusslons serve as a scaffold.
LfS Assessment]Scor|ng Cr|ter|a WhaL do l need Lo collecL or admlnlsLer Lo prove LhaL sLudenLs have grown Lowards and/or achleved deslred ouLcomes/sLandards? WhaL crlLerla wlll l use Lo assess/evaluaLe sLudenL work?
*** |ease see kU8kIC LfS/SLaLe SLandard (name) LfS/SLaLe erformance lndlcaLor (leLLer and number) LfS/SLaLe AssessmenL lnsLrumenL LfS/SLaLe Scorlng CrlLerla PlsLory, CulLure, and erspecLlves 6.1..u.1 1eacher observaLlon SLudenL dlscusslon- are sLudenLs able Lo dlscuss Lhemselves CrlLlcal 1hlnklng and roblem Solvlng 9.1.4.A.3 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL parLlclpaLlon ln dlscusslons CreaLlvlLy and lnnovaLlon 9.1.4.8.1 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL parLlclpaLlon ln dlscusslons 8eadlng: LlLeraLure 1 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL dlscusslon- parLlclpaLlon ln dlscusslon abouL LexL 8eadlng: LlLeraLure 3 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL dlscusslon- ls sLudenL able Lo dlscuss Lhe maln characLer's response Lo challenges Speaklng and LlsLenlng 1 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL parLlclpaLlon ln dlscusslons Speaklng and LlsLenlng 3 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL parLlclpaLlon ln dlscusslons Speaklng and LlsLenlng 6 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL parLlclpaLlon ln dlscusslons MulLlple P: 4 1eacher SLudenL dlscusslon- 4S
EXCELLENCE NARRATIVE: Alex is in third grade and he is a very good soccer player for someone who is 9 years old. He has heard adults say this about him. His soccer coach and the Phys Ed teacher at school always tell Alex that he is a natural athlete. Alex is not sure what that means, except that it must mean hes good at sports. He is glad that they tell him that because everyone seems happy that he plays sports, especially soccer and that he scores a lot of goals during a season. His traveling soccer team just won the state championship in their age level and he was awarded the Excellent Player award.
Alex likes soccer, but he doesnt have to try very hard at it to score goals. Alex also likes school and is really interested in the science unit they are doing right now about animal habitats. Hes so glad that soccer season is over for a couple of months so that he can play outside with his friends when he is home from school. One of his favorite things to do is to go down by the little creek near his house and turn over rocks to see what creatures live underneath. So when his class started exploring the habitats that were in their state, he was excited that his teacher let him work on researching the woodlands habitat. The problem for Alex was that he had to present what he learned about his habitat to his class, and Alex never was very excellent in making things with his hands. His friend Chris was also researching the woodlands habitat and so they decided to work together.
Chris showed Alex how to use the software for their class smartboard to create pages with photos and facts that they learned from searching the web. Alex worked for hours at school and at home to find photos and facts about the animals found in woodland habitats and Chris did the research for the kinds of trees and flowers. Alex created 5 great pages about the five most common animals found in the woods of their state. They were the first partners to present their habitat. They stood at the smartboard and made their presentation. When they were done, everyone cheered and clapped and the teacher had the other second grade classes come in and see their presentation. She told the other partner groups that Alex and Chriss presentation was excellent and that it was a great model of the kinds of presentations shes hoping to see from the other groups. Alex was so proud! When he was talking to his grandma about what the teacher had said and how happy he felt, she told him that he was feeling proud because he did an excellent job on something he worked really hard at. erspecLlve CbservaLlon are sLudenLs able Lo dlscuss Lhemselves MulLlple erspecLlves P: 3 1eacher CbservaLlon SLudenL dlscusslon- are sLudenLs able Lo connecL Lhelr dlfferences Lo oLhers'? 46
Advanced roflclenL 8aslc SLraLegles of Speaklng and LlsLenlng
All sLandards uemonsLraLes sLraLegles of a proflclenL llsLener and speaker, wlLh flexlblllLy approprlaLe Lo varylng audlences and purposes. uemonsLraLes sLraLegles of proflclenL llsLener and speaker, buL lacks ablllLy Lo creaLe flexlblllLy- unable Lo undersLand reasonlng behlnd. Confuses Lhe purpose and message of Lhe spoken work, heslLanL Lo speak wlLh a group, presenLs lnformaLlon as random facLs, omlLs lnformaLlon when recalllng a sLory. ConvenLlons of Speaklng and LlsLenlng
All sLandards uemonsLraLes convenLlons of a proflclenL llsLener and speaker wlLh flexlblllLy approprlaLe Lo audlence and purpose. May use approprlaLe pragmaLlc feaLures of dlscourse and senLence sLrucLure and grammar errors are mlnor. Confuses sLandard Lngllsh convenLlons whlch lmpalr meanlng, speech/language dlfflculL Lo undersLand. lnLrapersonal knowledge
All sLandards Lxpresses knowledge of ones self arLlculaLely and wlLh sLrong confldence. Lxpresses knowledge of ones self raLher arLlculaLely and wlLh some confldence. ln unable Lo express knowledge of ones self. MulLlple erspecLlves
P7 ls able Lo use knowledge of ones self Lo connecL wlLh oLhers easlly. ls able Lo use knowledge of ones self Lo connecL wlLh oLhers wlLh asslsLance. ls unable Lo use knowledge of ones self Lo connecL wlLh oLher afLer prompLs.
47
Appendix C
Grade: 1/2 Multiage Unit: The GoodWork Project- series of Word Mapping Lesson: Word Mapping
Lesson Overview
These series of lessons are designed to help students internalize vocabulary through the use of a word map. The use of word mapping in this lesson is to allow the students to continue assimilating into their development the concepts of good work and allow them to build upon this knowledge as they navigate the digital world.
Number of Class Periods (e.g. 3 45-minute periods): 7-40 minute periods
Standards NJ State Standards (2009): 9.1.4.F.1 Explain the meaning of productivity and accountability, and describe situations in which productivity and accountability are important in the home, school, and community. 9.1.4.F.2 Establish and follow performance goals to guide progress in assigned areas of responsibility and accountability during classroom projects and extra-curricular activities.
National Standards (2012): 2.3.2.B.RI.2.4 Determine the meaning of words and phrases in a text relevant to a grade 2 topic or subject area. 2.3.6.C.L.2.4 Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple- meaning words and phrases based on second grade reading and content
EfS (Education for Sustainability) Standards (add performance indicators and narratives if applicable) H: Multiple Perspectives 7. How can I use my knowledge of others differences to understand their views and actions and achieve a common goal? G: Inventing and Affecting the Future 6. Demonstrate the habit of turning problems into opportunities to make positive change.
Essential Question: What are the 3 Es?
Guiding Questions: What is a word map? Can you make a personal connection to words? How do you write a sentence based on a word?
Resources/materials for this lesson: 48
Webquest: http://questgarden.com/146/51/5/120716111216/ Chart paper SMARTboard if available or projector Amber on the Mountain by Tony Johnson The Story of Ferdinand by Munro Leaf Zoozical by Judy Sierra LucidChart or Kidspiration (whatever your district has access to) Word Cloud website: http://www.abcya.com/word_clouds.htm Rubric for assessment
Learning Opportunities, Activities, and Procedures: Day 1: Activate students prior knowledge by discussing the three Es (engagement, excellence, and ethics). Can students remember anything about the previous conversations had? What were the definitions that the class came up with? Tell the students that they came up with a great definition for the 3 Es, but theyre going to refine those definitions by looking at engagement a little more in- depth. Ask students to name various ways of learning vocabulary. Approaches may include flash cards, crossword puzzles, acting out word meanings, Spelling Go Fish, etc. Split the class into two teams. Team A may use only 5 words to describe what makes someone engaged and Team B may use an unlimited number of words. As the teams collaborate, point out the use of various senses in approaching this task. The choice of only five words for Team A will be more challenging and require a strong sense of vocabulary. Bring the whole class together, and have groups compare their experiences while working on this activity. Team collaboration will play a key role, particularly for Team A, because each student in the group will have contributed different associations and examples for descriptive words for engagement before reaching a consensus.
Day 2: Then, tell the students that one way to strengthen their vocabulary and learn more about a word is to create a word map. Follow the following steps to introduce this concept. o STEP 1: Write the word work in the center of the page or SMARTboard. o STEP 2: Using a dictionary (www.dictionary.com), look up the word and locate the correct definition. Employ a think aloud to ask, Does this make sense based on what I already know about the word? Record the correct definition on the word map page you create in either LucidChart or Kidspiration. o STEP 3: Use the dictionary to find a synonym for the word. Record this on the map. 49
o STEP 4: Use the thesaurus to find other forms of the word (remind the students this process was learned during writers workshop) o STEP 5: Make connections to the word. Its also important, at this point, to ask students to verbalize their own connections to the word. This is a key step toward ownership of the vocabulary. o STEP 6: Create a sketch of the word. o STEP 7: Develop a sentence using the word. Elicit critical thinking skills by asking students why the sequence of these steps is important- chart responses.
Day 3: Invite students to again think about word mapping. Question students to repeat the methods of formulating a definition through the process of concept mapping. Lead the students to becoming excited about independently formulating definitions about the 3 Es. Tell students that they will be working in small groups to conduct an investigation of the meaning of ethics, excellence, and engagement. Using the SMARTboard or another projector, begin showing students the Webquest- The 3 Es. Be sure to walk students though each step of the Webquest process explicitly showing students how to access information.
Day 4: Have students get into their small, collaborative groups and create their own word map for engagement using the Webquest. Be available to assist students who are struggling and provide verbal prompting is necessary. When finished, invite students to share their word maps. Read to the students, Amber on the Mountain by Tony Johnson and discuss with the students how the main character shows good work by being engaged- is there anything the students would like to add to their word maps of engagement?
Day 5: Have students get into their small, collaborative groups and create their own word map for ethics using the Webquest. Be available to assist students who are struggling and provide verbal prompting is necessary. When finished, invite students to share their word maps. Read to the students, Zoozical by Judy Sierra and discuss with the students how the main character shows good work by being an ethical person- is there anything the students would like to add to their word maps of ethics?
Day 6: Have students get into their small, collaborative groups and create their own word map for excellence using the Webquest. Be available to assist students who are struggling and provide verbal prompting is necessary. When finished, invite students to share their word maps. Su
Read to the students, The Story of Ferdinand by Munro Leaf and discuss with the students how the main character shows good work by being an excellent person- is there anything the students would like to add to their word maps of excellence?
Day 7: Before students enter the class, take the student groups word maps and enter each groups ideas about each E into a word cloud (http://www.abcya.com/word_clouds.htm). Word clouds take a list of words and create a picture out of it emphasizing the most used words. Gather students on the carpet and show them each of the 3 Es word clouds- one at a time. Discuss with students their reactions to the clouds. Why do they think certain words were used most often? Be sure to post the word maps and word clouds in a prominent place so students can refer to their ideas throughout the year.
Instructional/Environmental Modifications/Differentiated Strategies Teacher modeling, small group collaborative work, and prompting serve as a scaffold
EfS Assessment/Scoring Criteria What do I need to collect or administer to prove that students have grown towards and/or achieved desired outcomes/standards? What criteria will I use to assess/evaluate student work?
EfS/State Standard (name) EfS/State Performance Indicator (letter and number) EfS/State Assessment Instrument EfS/State Scoring Criteria 9.1.4.F.1 21 st Century Life Skills Teacher Observation Are students able to describe ethics? 9.1.4.F.2 21 st Century Life Skills Teacher Observation Are students able to describe how their views of engagement have changed? 2.3.2.B.RI.2.4 Reading: Informational Texts Student Word Map Do student word maps show an understanding of the meaning of engagement? 2.3.6.C.L.2.4 Language Use Student Word Map Do student word maps show an understanding of the meaning of engagement? Multiple Perspectives H7 Teacher Observation Are students able to work with a group? S1
Inventing and Affecting the Future G6 Teacher Observation Do student discussions show a positive change in their thinking about engagement? S2
Expert 4 Secure 3 Developing 2 Beginning 1 Oral discussions The speaker provides a variety of types of content for understanding good work- speaker is able to clearly discuss good work and differentiate for others when explaining. The speaker focuses primarily on relevant content- good work. The speaker sticks to the topic. The speaker adapts the content of good work in a general way to the listener and the situation. The speaker includes some irrelevant content. The speaker is obviously confused by the concept of good work. The speaker says practically nothing. The speaker focuses primarily on irrelevant content. The speaker appears to ignore the listener and the situation. Group Work The student almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Tries to keep people working well together. The student usually listens to, shares, with, and supports the efforts of others. Does not cause "waves" in the group. The student often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others, but sometimes is not a good team member. The student rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others. Often is not a good team player. Positive Change Student discussion shows a positive change in their thinking about good work. The student can also explain how their thinking has changed. Student discussion shows a positive change in their thinking about good work, but they cannot explain this change. Student discussion does not show a positive change in their thinking about good work. Student is not showing respect for the discussions in the classroom. Final Product The student provides work of the highest quality. The student provides high quality work. The student provides work that occasionally needs to be checked/redone by other group members to ensure quality. The student provides work that usually needs to be checked/redone by others to ensure quality.
Notes:
SS
Appendix D
Grade: 1/2 Multiage Unit: Good Work - Continuing the Discussion Lesson: Video and Discussion of Good Work
Lesson Overview In bringing the Cultural Unit to a close, students will be guided to compare their Good Work and the 3Es to children in Bhutan.
Number of Class Periods (e.g. 3 45-minute periods): 3 morning meetings (20-30 minute sessions)
Standards State Standards (2009) 6.1.P.A.3- Civics, Government, and Human Rights Demonstrate appropriate behavior when collaborating with others. 9.1.4.B.1- Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Participate in brainstorming sessions to seek information, ideas, and strategies that foster creative thinking.
National Standards (2012) Speaking and Listening Comprehension and Collaboration Grade 2 1. Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about grade 2 topics and texts with peers and adults in small and larger groups. Speaking and Listening Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas Grade 2 6. Produce complete sentences with appropriate to task and situation in order to provide requested detail or clarification.
EfS Standards (add performance indicators and narratives if applicable) B: Responsible Local and Global Citizenship o 1. Articulate the rights and responsibilities of democratic participation and leadership in both local and global contexts. o 4. Form an opinion about the requirements of responsible local, national, and global citizenship by synthesizing diverse perspectives on participation and governance. o 7. Demonstrate individual and collective respect for themselves and the Commons. o 10. Use their own choices as exemplars that demonstrate awareness that all human choices contribute to sustainable or unsustainable consequences. G: Inventing and Affecting the Future 1. Develop visioning skills to create a healthy and sustainable future. H: Multiple Perspectives 7. How can I understand and work with others to achieve a common goal? I: Sense of Place 22. Engage in goal setting/future visioning. S4
Essential Question: How are students doing Good Work?
Guiding Questions: Before first viewing of video: Lets think back over our culture unit what have we done? Projects? Activities? Good Work? What are our 3 Es? Where in the world is Bhutan? Lets watch the video of a project that school children around your age in Bhutan did: How are they the same as us and our service learning project? How are they different than us?
Resources/materials for this lesson: Say no to package food! (video created by children in Bhutan working with Design for Change) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iQ17BcL8wzc
Learning Opportunities, Activities, and Procedures: Day 1: Guide children in discussion during morning meeting using the guided questions above. On first day, have them actively view the video for purpose of looking for engaged students what does engagement look like? After the video, record their thoughts and comparisons Day 2: Guide children in discussion during morning meeting using the guided questions above. On second day, have them actively view the video for purpose of looking for characteristics of excellence what is excellent about the Bhutan childrens work? After the video, record their thoughts and comparisons Day 3: Guide children in discussion during morning meeting using the guided questions above. On third day, have them actively view the video for purpose of looking for ethical citizenship what does it look like? After the video, record their thoughts and comparisons Day 4: As a class, research with students the country of Bhutan to provide an understanding of the differences in culture and thought. Ammended. I have received a video from a teacher in Bhutan of her students explaining their classroom and daily routine- show this and compare and contrast our classroom.
Instructional/Environmental Modifications/Differentiated Strategies SS
Many multiple intelligences are touched upon in this lesson from auditory participation and visual cues for discussion.
EfS Assessment/Scoring Criteria What do I need to collect or administer to prove that students have grown towards and/or achieved desired outcomes/standards? What criteria will I use to assess/evaluate student work?
EfS/State Standard (name) EfS/State Performance Indicator (letter and number) EfS/State Assessment Instrument EfS/State Scoring Criteria ** Please see rubric S6
+ , * ) ( 0$-1"23 45 6477&829 Timely anu appiopiiate comments, thoughtful anu ieflective, iesponus iespectfully to othei stuuent's iemaiks, piovokes questions anu comments fiom the gioup volunteeis comments, most aie appiopiiate anu ieflect some thoughtfulness, leaus to othei questions oi iemaiks fiom stuuent anuoi otheis volunteeis comments but lacks uepth, may oi may not leau to othei questions fiom stuuents Stiuggles but paiticipates, occasionally offeis a comment when uiiectly questioneu, may simply iestate questions oi points pieviously iaiseu, may auu nothing new to the uiscussion oi piovoke no iesponses oi question Boes not paiticipate anuoi only makes negative oi uisiuptive iemaiks, comments aie inappiopiiate oi off topic :&94$%;&<=4;$7&82 :&5&%&8;& Cleai iefeience to text being uiscusseu anu connects to it to othei text oi iefeience points fiom pievious ieauings anu uiscussions Bas uone the ieauing with some thoioughness, may lack some uetail oi ciitical insight Bas uone the ieauing; lacks thoioughness of unueistanuing oi insight Bas not ieau the entiie text anu cannot sustain any iefeience to it in the couise of uiscussion 0nable to iefei to text foi eviuence oi suppoit of iemaiks >;2"?& @"92&8"8# Postuie, uemeanoi anu behavioi cleaily uemonstiate iespect anu attentiveness to otheis Listens to otheis most of the time, uoes not stay focuseu on othei's comments (too busy foimulating own) oi loses continuity of uiscussion. Shows consistency in iesponuing to the comments of otheis Listens to otheis some of the time, uoes not stay focuseu on othei's comments (too busy foimulating own) oi loses continuity of uiscussion. Shows some consistency in iesponuing to the comments of otheis Biifts in anu out of uiscussion, listening to some iemaiks while cleaily missing oi ignoiing otheis Bisiespectful of otheis when they aie speaking; behavioi inuicates total non- involvement with gioup oi uiscussion A49"2"?& 6B-8#& Stuuent uiscussion shows a positive change in theii thinking about goou woik. The stuuent can also explain how theii thinking has changeu. Stuuent uiscussion shows a positive change in theii thinking about goou woik, but they cannot explain this change. Stuuent uiscussion uoes now show a positive change in theii thinking about goou woik. Stuuent is not showing iespect foi the uiscussions in the classioom. Stuuent is unable to paiticipate. S7
Appenuix E
Grade: 1/2 Multiage Unit: The GoodWork Toolkit Lesson: Quandary Game
Lesson Overview Students will have the opportunity to explore the ideas of ETHICS through a discussion of simulated ethical dilemmas. The discussion of choices and making smart choices with young children, from the research that I have done with my class, opens a deeper conversation and deeper critical thinking about 21 st century skills. This lesson is adapted from a lesson based on Quandary Game by The Learning Group Network.
Number of Class Periods (e.g. 3 45-minute periods): 10-40 minute periods then periodically during centers time in small groups to continue the discussion.
Standards Core Standards - Reading Standards for Literature 1-7 - Reading Standards for Information Text 1-9 - Speaking and Listening Standards 1-4 - P21: Critical thinking and Problem Solving o Reason Effectively o Use Systems Thinking o Make Judgments and Decisions o Solve Problems o Identify and ask significant questions that clarify various points of views and lead to better solutions. - P21: Communication and Collaboration o Communicate Clearly o Collaborate with Others EfS Standards (add performance indicators and narratives if applicable) - Multiple Perspectives H:7 - Strong Sense of Place I:22
Essential Question: What makes a good community?
Guiding Questions: - What was your role in the game? - What did you have to do? - What is the difference between a fact, an opinion, and a solution? - What opinions did you have for solving the colonys problem? - What made you choose the solution you chose? - Did you find it hard to choose a solution? If so, why? - That game encouraged you to find out other peoples points of view, but did you listen to them when making your decision? S8
- Why did you think its important to understand other points of views? - Did you try another solution? If so, what and why? If not, what else might have worked? - How well did your colony do overall? What do you think the success of the colony depends on? Try to think of some words to describe how youd measure success. - What was good about the outcome of your solution? - Have you ever faced a similar problem in your own life- a problem where theres no clear answer and you dont know what to do? If there anything that you learned form the game that would help you make decisions when you face similar problems?
Resources/materials for this lesson: - SMARTboard or projector - Internet - You Tube video: http://youtu.be/XjL3M6y6T0E - Exit Ticket (see below) - Writing Prompt (See below) - Computers/laptops (at least 1 for every 3-4 students) - Quandary Game: http://www.quandarygame.org/ - Chart paper/markers - White paper for drawing - Crayons/markers for students
Learning Opportunities, Activities, and Procedures: Day 1: Introduce the game In a whole group session, ask the students Do you know what the games title means? What is a quandary? Elicit responses from the students; accept all responses that the students can justify- chart ideas. Using the classroom SMARTboard for projector, look up the definition of the word using at least 2-3 sources and then ask the question again- What is a quandary? Chart all responses that students can justify again. Show students the You Tube video explaining what a quandary is: http://youtu.be/XjL3M6y6T0E. EXIT ticket: Students will write a sentence about what they believe a quandary is.
Day 2 and 3: Continuation of the Introduction In a whole group session, show students the website for the game (www.quandarygame.org). Tell the students that they will have the opportunity to play the game in small groups in the upcoming days. Summarize by telling students: this game challenges you to make tough decisions about how to build a colony on a new planet. Walk students through the start page on the game and discuss that they can sign up for a log in to save their games at home, but for the purposes of class, each student will be playing at a guest. ** Be sure to show the students how each set of words can be read to them.
S9
Walk through the steps together- vote as a class each decision to be made: - Choose a character - Choose an episode o Lost Sheep o Water War o Fashion Faction Within the episode there will be choices to be made- discussing each decision with the whole class without commenting from the teachers perspective.
When finished playing, discuss the experience while weaving the following questions into the discussion: Players role - What was your role in the game? - What did you have to do?
Making decisions - What is the difference between a fact, an opinion, and a solution? - What opinions did you have for solving the colonys problem? - What made you choose the solution you chose? - Did you find it hard to choose a solution? If so, why? - That game encouraged you to find out other peoples points of view, but did you listen to them when making your decision? - Why did you think its important to understand other points of views?
Impact on colony - Did you try another solution? If so, what and why? If not, what else might have worked? - How well did your colony do overall? What do you think the success of the colony depends on? Try to think of some words to describe how youd measure success. - What was good about the outcome of your solution?
Then, extend the students thinking about the decisions they made by asking: Have you ever faced a similar problem in your own life- a problem where theres no clear answer and you dont know what to do? If there anything that you learned form the game that would help you make decisions when you face similar problems?
Concrete activity: Have students draw a picture of a time they experienced a quandary. This can be used for a bulletin board to assist in student understanding.
Day 4-5: Students should work in small groups to work through and discuss the episode of their choosing. It is important for the teacher to circulate and add to discussion.
Day 6-10: During center time, the students should work in small groups to go through an episode and discuss.
6u
Assessment: Exit ticket/timed writing in preparation for student written narratives (next GoodWork activity planned).
Write about a time that you experienced using good work (ethics, excellence, or engagement).
Instructional/Environmental Modifications/Differentiated Strategies Students are working in homogeneous partnerships.
EfS Assessment/Scoring Criteria What do I need to collect or administer to prove that students have grown towards and/or achieved desired outcomes/standards? What criteria will I use to assess/evaluate student work?
EfS/State Standard (name) EfS/State Performance Indicator (letter and number) EfS/State Assessment Instrument EfS/State Scoring Criteria ** Please see rubric 61
4 3 2 1 Relationship and Role Models - Does students response show the basic principles of good work? - Does student describe their feelings through conversation or short answers?
NJCCCS 9.1.4.A.5 9.1.4.D.2
Student discusses consequences of positive or negative relationship/role model; discusses ways in which an individual can negotiate conflicting opinions in relation to his/her own ethical standards.
Because the teacher stood up for Chrysanthemum, it made the students see that flower names are nice. The student should comment about Chrysanthemums change in feelings. Student is aware of power difference between junior and senior persons and the difficulty of navigating this power differential when opinions conflict.
Student addresses the concept of good work by discussing how they felt about Chrysanthemums dilemma- no one told the students not to treat her that way, and explains why they are feeling a certain way.
Student is unsure or unable to express her/his thoughts about role models and social realtionships.
Student addresses the concept of good work by discussing how they felt about Chrysanthemums dilemma. Does not address Individual background, expertise, beliefs, values - Where does student pull examples from- personal experience, literature?
NJCCCS 9.1.4.A.5 Takes a position on to what extent he/she agrees with how individual actor navigates the dilemma, making connections to ideas about mission and standard.
I can understand why Chrysanthemum Analyze how these particular factors influence how the dilemma is handled
Because Chrysanthemum is so proud of her name before she does go into school, she feels sad when people laugh at her name on Recognizes that individual background, expertise, beliefs, values of individual actor in dilemma as relevant to how he handles the dilemma
Chrysanthemum believes that her name is the best name ever. Does not address 62
doesnt like her name anymore - she used to think her name was the best name, but she didnt know students in her class would make fun of her about it. the first day of school. Responsibility - Is student able to differentiated between situations where GoodWork is relevant or important? - Is student able to comment on an individuals responsibility for good work?
LA: R-L KIDG2.1 9.1.4.A.5 EfS B8
Student is able to show his/her critical thinking by explaining via writing why good work is important to the classroom community- pride.
Student presents an argument for how the bullying toward Chrysanthemum affects the class as a whole.
The student should not pick on Chrysanthemum, it is the role of her classmates to stop the bully. Student is able to show his/her critical thinking by explaining via writing why good work is important for him/her.
Student discusses how the actions toward Chrysanthemum affect themselves and their feelings and gives a reason why.
Though she needs to stand up for herself, the students should not pick on Chrysanthemum. Student is able to explain, via writing, basic understanding of good work, but is unable to describe the implications of this knowledge.
Student discusses how the actions toward Chrysanthemum affect themselves and their feelings.
Chrysanthemum should not be picked on. Everyone should be kind. Does not address
Scoiing uuiue:
12-16 points- The stuuent has an excellent, complex unueistanuing of uoouWoik. 8-12 points- The stuuent has a faii, suiface level unueistanuing of uoouWoik. 4-8 points- The stuuent has a ueveloping unueistanuing of uoouWoik at a base level. u-4 points- The stuuent has little to no unueistanuing of uoouWoik.
M892%$;2"489 54% 48NE&7-8E A%&N-99&997&82F Stuuents shoulu be given the oppoitunity to choose wiiting papei baseu on theii uevelopmental ieauiness. Some youngei stuuents may want to uiaw pictuies insteau of wiiting, oi a combination of both. Stuuents will neeu the oppoitunity to auu pages to theii booklets if uesiieu. Stuuents shoulu be given 2u- Su minutes foi this activity. This is meant as an on-uemanu 6S
uiscussion of goou woik anu no piioi infoimation shoulu be given.
Grade: first through eighth grade Unit: The GoodWork Toolkit Lesson: Partner Writing- Ethical Narratives
Lesson Overview: This lesson is designed to develop an understanding of the concept of personal ethics in moving toward the development of authoring partner ethical narratives.
Number of Class Periods (e.g. 3 45-minute periods): one session
Standards State Standards (2009) 6.1.P.A.3- Civics, Government, and Human Rights Demonstrate appropriate behavior when collaborating with others. 6.3.4.A.3- Active Citizenship in the 21 st Century Select a local issue and develop a group action plan to inform school and/or community members about the issue. 9.1.4.A.1- Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Recognize a problem and brainstorm ways to solve the problem individually or collaboratively. 9.1.4.A.2- Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Evaluate available resources that can assist in solving problems. 9.1.4.B.1- Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Participate in brainstorming sessions to seek information, ideas, and strategies that foster creative thinking.
National Standards (2012) Reading: Literature Key Ideas and Details Grade 2 1. Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key ideas and details in a text. Reading: Literature Key Ideas and Details Grade 2 3. Describe how characters in a story respond to major events and challenges. Speaking and Listening Comprehension and Collaboration Grade 2 1. Participate in collaborative conversations with diverse partners about grade 2 topics and texts with peers and adults in small and larger groups. Speaking and Listening Presentation of Knowledge and Ideas Grade 2 6. Produce complete sentences with appropriate to task and situation in order to provide requested detail or clarification.
EfS Standards (add performance indicators and narratives if applicable) B: Responsible Local and Global Citizenship o 1. Articulate the rights and responsibilities of democratic participation and leadership in both local and global contexts. o 4. Form an opinion about the requirements of responsible local, national, and global citizenship by synthesizing diverse perspectives on participation and governance. 92
o 7. Demonstrate individual and collective respect for themselves and the Commons. o 10. Use their own choices as exemplars that demonstrate awareness that all human choices contribute to sustainable or unsustainable consequences. G: Inventing and Affecting the Future 1. Develop visioning skills to create a healthy and sustainable future. H: Multiple Perspectives 7. How can I understand and work with others to achieve a common goal? I: Sense of Place 22. Engage in goal setting/future visioning.
Essential Question: What makes a good community?
Guiding Questions: Did you discover differences or similarities between how you completed the sort for yourself versus how you thought your peers might complete it? What are the differences? What are the similarities? What do you make of them? Consider the values on these cards. Do any of them resonate for you? What values do you consider your own? Which of the values guide your approach to work? Your approach to peer relationships? Your approach to familial relationships? Are there any values that are important to you that are not listed? If so, what are they? Why is it important to perceive life from anothers perspective? What is your ethical responsibility? How is being responsible making you an ethical person? How can you use descriptive language to enhance the readability of your story? In what ways can you strengthen your stories? How do writers give a special atmosphere to common settings?
Resources/materials for this lesson: GoodWork Toolkit- Value Sort cards GoodWork Toolkit- Value Sort SMARTboard activity Chart paper Hey Little Ant by Philip Hoose http://ensemble.stanford.edu
Learning Opportunities, Activities, and Procedures: Step 1: Value Sort on SMARTboard. With a set of thirty GoodWork Toolkit Value Sort cards (or the cards in the SMARTboard file), do the following three activities: 1. As a class, think of an activity that is important to you (collectively), something you would find hard to miss. Think about how you go about doing this activity (e.g. soccer, rest reading, class meeting). Were going to sort the values in terms of importance to you while involved in this activity. Together, were going to follow the grid so that only the allotted number of cards is placed in a particular 9S
category. (Teacher- when the activity is finished, save the SMARTboard file and print.) 2. As a class, now were going to sort the cards in terms of you personally (when not in an activity). Together, were going to follow the grid so that only the allotted number of cards is placed in a particular category. (Teacher- when the activity is finished, save the SMARTboard file and print.) 3. As a class, now were going to sort the cards in terms of how we think other people see the values. Together, were going to follow the grid so that only the allotted number of cards is placed in a particular category. (Teacher- when the activity is finished, save the SMARTboard file and print.)
Step 2: Read Hey Little Ant! By Phillip and Hannah Hoose. Discuss with the students the choice to squish or save the ant. Chart the students responses- focus on the ethical responsibility surrounding preservation of nature.
Step 3: Pair students for the process of writing their own GoodWork story- discuss ethical dilemmas, problem and solution, and cause and effect. Students will use the website http://ensemble.stanford.edu to partner write. They will need to log in using: fall2013global++@gmail.com and the password: fall2013global.
Instructional/Environmental Modifications/Differentiated Strategies Partners serve as a scaffold
EfS Assessment/Scoring Criteria What do I need to collect or administer to prove that students have grown towards and/or achieved desired outcomes/standards? What criteria will I use to assess/evaluate student work?
Assessment Rubric: ethical narrative activity
4 3 2 1 Relationship and Role Models - Does students response show the basic principles of good work? - Does student describe their feelings through conversation or short answers? Student discusses consequences of positive or negative relationship/role model; discusses ways in which an individual can negotiate conflicting opinions in relation to his/her own ethical standards.
Student is aware of power difference between junior and senior persons and the difficulty of navigating this power differential when opinions conflict.
Student is unsure or unable to express her/his thoughts about role models and social relationships.
Does not address 94
NJCCCS 9.1.4.A.5 9.1.4.D.2 Individual background, expertise, beliefs, values - Where does student pull examples from- personal experience, literature? NJCCCS 9.1.4.A.5 Takes a position on to what extent he/she agrees with how individual actor navigates the dilemma, making connections to ideas about mission and standard.
Analyze how these particular factors influence how the dilemma is handled
Recognizes that individual background, expertise, beliefs, values of individual actor in dilemma as relevant to how he handles the dilemma
Does not address Responsibility - Is student able to differentiated between situations where GoodWork is relevant or important? - Is student able to comment on an individuals responsibility for good work? LA: R-L KIDG2.1 9.1.4.A.5 EfS I 22 Student is able to show his/her critical thinking by explaining via writing why ethical behavior is important to the classroom community- pride.
Student is able to show his/her critical thinking by explaining via writing why ethical behavior is important for him/her.
Student is able to explain, via writing, basic definition of ethical behavior, but is unable to describe the implications of this knowledge.
Does not address
Scoring Guide: 12-16 points- The student has an excellent, complex understanding of ethics. 8-12 points- The student has a fair, surface level understanding of ethics. 4-8 points- The student has a developing understanding of ethics at a base level. 0-4 points- The student has little to no understanding of ethics.