Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal Scholarship is
the story of the legal tradition.
Legislatures & Parliaments make laws Citizens interact with laws Courts and tribunals interpret laws as applied Legal scholars
Writing = communication
Good writing is: Clear
Choose the message you want to send Deliver your message in the most direct way Send your message to the right audience Make the audience care about the message
Concise
Directed
Engaging
Analyze
soundly, verbally and in writing, on the structure, conduct and results of the research.
Write
Part One:
CHOOSING A TOPIC
Choosing a Topic
You and your research will be spending a lot of time together. Make sure you will get along. Ask yourself:
Law Review Articles Legal Opinions Class discussions Conversations with professors Social debates
Novel Non-obvious Useful Sound Seen by the reader to be all of the above
Eugene Volokh, Academic Legal Writing (3rd ed, Foundation Press 2007) 9
Choosing a Thesis/Problem
Four types of problems
Descriptive
Explanatory
Why is it like this and not like that? What are the connections?
Why are so many defendants acquitted in Country X?
Evaluational
Advisory
IRAC Example:
The Role of the Individual in International Law.*
Issue: Does the individual have civil legal obligations
under international law? Rule: The decision-making process of international courts Analysis: The individual has international criminal law obligations. The individual is also developing rights under international criminal law. These rights will lead to civil obligations. Conclusion: Individuals have certain civil law obligations under international law.
*Andrew Clapham The Role of the Individual in International Law (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 25
Part Two:
Targeted Research
Start with the rule (the original source) Read the statute/guideline/treaty in question. If not relevant, what is the current practice? What is its plain meaning? Existing interpretations of the rule What relevant bodies have already interpreted the rule? Courts, tribunals, administrative bodies? Where have those decisions been cited? What legal scholarship already exists expanding on those interpretations?
Journal Databases
Two faculty of law libraries The Law Library (JB) at Oudemanhuispoort The Documentation Centre of the Institute for Information Law (IVIR) at Rokin 84
How to Research Students in the English master program will receive a course from library staff Thesis Manual gives resources
Thesis Manual, 23
bibliography
Analysis
IRAC revisited.
Conclusion
Are there smaller/sub-issues into which they can be broken down? Example Issue:
Analysis or Application
How do the relevant rules apply to the facts
underlying my thesis? Is there a general principle that unites all the rules relevant to your thesis?
Consistencies
inconsistent approaches?
That have changed over time? That are legally consistent because of different facts? That represent different approaches in different jurisdictions?
Counter Arguments
Presumably, you will have found support for your
Because they are from irrelevant jurisdictions Because their logic is unconvincing Because relevant courts are unlikely to follow them Other reasons
start again?
Part Three
you will get there, your reader has no chance of following you
Brainstorm Madman
Get the ideas on paper however it works for
Let the problem guide the structure See the conclusion coming Dont be afraid to kill your darlings
Thesis Manual 30
First Point
I. II. Sub issue of first point I. Detail of sub issue Second sub issue Sub issue of second point
II.
Second Point
I.
Fill in more and more detail until you have a cohesive story.
Introduction
Where are we going?
State the main point of your essay and summarize your conclusion. Engage the reader in the subject Provide necessary background information Summarize the structure of your paper so the reader knows what to expect.
Why do we care?
Body: Structure
Organize your essay into chapters or sections, as
Stay consistent with your introduction (or go back and revise later)
One idea per paragraph: Topic Sentence Support the topic sentence with evidence, examples, and sources Conclude and transition to the next paragraph either here or in first line of next paragraph.
Body: Transitions
Paragraphs should progress logically and
smoothly
Signal words or phrases* Time: before, prior to, meanwhile, during Relationships
Similar: Moreover, furthermore, for example Different: Contrary to, on the other hand
Thesis Manual 34
Body: Analysis
IRAC works everywhere:
Can help organize the whole paper (main issue) as well as individual paragraphs (sub issues) Strongest to weakest Dont ignore adverse authority or counter arguments
Conclusion
Sum up Restate argument Perhaps a vision for future scholarship,
broader significance
DO NOT introduce new arguments or
evidence.
Part Four
Citation
Why cite?
To avoid any allegations of plagiarism To give credit where credit is due To give authority to our arguments
Attribution
Your opinion isnt really what matters (yet)
even inadvertently, implies the ideas on the page are your own, and effectively steals them from the original author.
This is not only bad karma, its plagiarism and will get you into trouble.
or omission, on the part of the student, which makes it difficult or impossible to assess his/her knowledge, insight and skills correctly.* * Regulations Governing Fraud and Plagiarism for UvA Students, Article 1:1
plagiarism.
Plagiarism is taken to mean any event
making use of, or as the case may be, taking over another persons text, data or ideas without complete and correct acknowledgement of source.*
*Regulations Governing Fraud and Plagiarism for UvA Students, Article 1:3a (emphasis added)
necessary.
You must cite any idea that belongs to someone else, even if you have paraphrased the material
Citations in Theory
When do I have to cite to an authority? Every time you include a statement, proposition or idea that is not your own.
Background sections may include fewer than analysis sections as it is not necessary to cite generally known information.
The world is round. December 1 is a Thursday.
Citation Format
Good citation is uniform Within your work and Within the community Makes it easer to find a source Include page numbers, paragraphs and sections UvA requests the use of the Oxford Standard for the
Quotations Format
Use quotation marks if
Same text More than four words are the same Distinctive or unusual language
You have paraphrased, borrowed, or relied upon any idea not your own.
Quotations Format* pt 2
Quotations of up to three lines are included in the
text.
Single quotation marks, unless a quote within quote, then double. (UK, not US style) Punctuation outside of the closing quotation mark, unless the whole sentence is a quotation.
block quotes.
Be careful about too many of these too much writing that is not your own.
Citations in Theory pt 2
Oxford Standard for the Citation of Legal
Authorities
Preferred standard for all UvA writing, but also for European law journals and courts.
http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/published/OSCOLA_4th_ edn.pdf
Print it out Keep it on hand When in doubt, check it out.
Citations in Theory pt 3
OSCOLA is a minimalist system Uses as little punctuation as possible No full stops (periods) after abbreviations, initials etc. Rule 1.3 Short-forms refer back to original footnote Rule 1.2.1 No signal words or Latin gadgets Avoid the use ofsupra, infra, ante, op cit, loc cit and contra, which are not widely understood. Ibid is allowed if you are repeating the information in the immediately preceding footnote. Rule 1.2.3
Footnotes in Practice
Include footnotes in superscript numbers, after any
Unless, for the sake of clarity, they must go in the middle of a sentence.
Always include page numbers Use as few numbers as possible, but always at least
OSCOLA
A simpler system, except.
Brackets
[Square brackets] around the year when the year also indicates the volume (Round brackets) around the year when there is a separate volume number.
Tip if you can cover the year up with your finger and still tell the volume, then use round brackets. If not, then use square.
In the text:
It is well represented in the case law, perhaps most notably in the expression of the no-conflict rule advocated by Lord Upjohn in Phipps v Boardman,31 and in the earlier Court of Appeal decision in Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians.32
31 [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL). 32 [1963] 2 QB 606 (CA).
Footnote
case name | [year] OR (year) | volume | report abbreviation | first page | (court) Not necessary because already in text.
OSCOLA example pt 2
Second reference in the text (also known as short form):
In Boulting [or in the Boulting case], Upjohn LJ said that the rule
must be applied realistically to a state of affairs which discloses a real conflict of duty and interest and not to some theoretical or rhetorical conflict.33 In Phipps, Lord Upjohn developed his view of the rule further by adding that there must be a real sensible possibility of conflict.34
Give the name of the case in full when it is first mentioned in the text or footnotes; it may be shortened thereafter.
Rule 2.1.2.
OSCOLA example pt 3
The footnotes for the above passage would appear
as follows:
33 Boulting (n 32) 638. OR 33 ibid 638. 34 Phipps (n 31) 124.
Rule 2.1.1
called pinpoints; they give the page on which the quotation can be found. It is also acceptable to include the full case reference in all footnotes.
Rule 1.1.1
Cite cases from other jurisdictions as they are cited in their own jurisdiction, but without any full stops in abbreviations. If the name of the law report series cited does not itself indicate the court, and the identity of the court is not obvious from the context, you should also give this in either full or short form in brackets at the end of the citation. When citing a decision of the highest court of a US state, the abbreviation of the name of the state suffices.
Henningsen v Bloomfield Motors Inc 161 A 2d 69 (NJ 1960) Michael v Johnson 426 US 346 (1976) Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 BGH NJW 1992, 1659 Cass civ (1) 21 January 2003, D 2003, 693
Secondary Sources
In general, Rule 3.1 Authors names exactly as they appear
First name, last name in footnotes Last name, first name in bibliographies
Italicize titles of books, journals. Articles are capitalized within single quotes. Part (pt), chapter (ch) and paragraph (ph) when necessary Page numbers stand alone (no p. pg. pp) Cite the hard copy whenever possible
Books
Rule 3.2
author, | title | (additional information, | edition, | publisher | year)
Examples
Timothy Endicott, Administrative Law (OUP 2009) Gareth Jones, Goff and Jones: The Law of Restitution (1st supp, 7th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2009)
When citing articles, give the authors name first, followed by a comma. Then give the title of the article, in roman within single quotation marks. After the title, give the publication information in the following order:
year of publication the volume number if there is one; the name of the journal; full or abbreviated form, with no full stops (See 4.2.1 for list of abbreviations); and the first page of the article.
author, | title | [year] | journal name or abbreviation | first page of article [author, | title | (year) | volume | journal name or abbreviation | first page of article
Internet/Electronic sources
When possible, use the hard copy cite
If website, see if PDF of the hard copy is available Author, Title of Article (Website Name, Date) <website address> accessed 18 November 2011
Part Five
Revision
Re-reading, revising and re-writing is the
It is the real writing the process by which you turn your thoughts into something a larger audience can read and wants to keep reading.
Revising Structure
Read your piece through from beginning to
end.
Do the paragraphs flow naturally from one to the other? Does the reader have the information she needs to grasp the points by the time she reaches them? Does your introduction still make sense in light of your conclusion?
Revising Content
I didnt have time to write a short letter, so I
Mark Twain
Streamline as much as possible. If you need to reread something to understand it, so will your reader. Rewrite it first. Read your paper out loud. Consider revision where you trip over the words.
Passive
Active voice
object
The object should not receive action from the subject YES: Ms. Watson signed a covenant-not-to-compete. NO: The covenant-not-to-compete was signed by Ms. Watson.
NO: It was insisted by Carrolton that the covenant had been breached by Ms. Watson. YES: Carrolton insisted that Ms. Watson had breached the covenant.
Means we arent sure of the point Material within the paragraph will prove the position Reading each thesis sentence should summarize your reasoning, point by point
Keep the paragraph content within the thesis Keep paragraphs moderately short
About half a page, double-spaced Quarter page single-spaced See handout on Transitional Phrases pay attention to meanings
In the first month of his marriage, the defendant, who was only 19 at the time, had never finished university and just lost his part-time job, was charged with robbing a convenience store. The defendant was charged with robbing a convenience store in the first month of his marriage. He was only 19 at the time, had never finished university and had just lost his job.
ideas
Make sure all items in a least and all repeated structures use the same grammatical elements Repeat the last word if the list is complex With simple sentences, no repetition necessary
Yes: Acme Pest Control selected the plaintiff for lay off because she had the least seniority and because she was consistently late for work.
because she + verb
NO: Acme Pest Control selected the plaintiff for lay-off because she had the least seniority and because of her tardiness.
because she + verb because + descriptive noun
Showing Providing evidence that leads to that conclusion using specific examples.
for example
Telling The human rights treaty is important. Showing The United Nations estimates that over 14,000 people lose their lives each year because border countries do not abide by the current human rights treaty.
Avoid Nominalizations
Nominalizations began life as verbs, then
Wordy Are in mitigation of Conduct an examination of Make accommodation for Provide a description of Take into consideration Make a provision for
-ion words
Efficient Mitigate Examine Accommodate Describe Consider Provide for
eliminate them:
It is important to note that.. It is important to remember that It seems that It is clear (or obvious) that It is widely understood that As noted above As to With respect (or regard) to
Editing
DO NOT leave Editing to the screen.
Print your work. Read through for errors in spelling and grammar. Dont stop reading for content and structure
Give to a friend to read Put aside for a few hours then do it again
Resources
Scripties Online
Database of all UvA Theses use for examples of what to do, and what not to do Check to make sure your thesis hasnt already been written How to Write a Thesis Page Thesis Manual