You are on page 1of 91

U.S.

Metro Economies Including Household Median Income


January 2012

2012 Employment Forecast Prepared for:

The United States Conference of Mayors


and the Impact of Exports and The Council for
the New American City

Prepared by:

The United States Conference of Mayors


January 2012

No one has been hit harder by the Great Recession than the 8.8 million Americans who have lost their jobs
during the most significant economic downturn in generations.

Our nation’s mayors are focused on doing everything we can to help the jobless, the underemployed, and
those worried about losing their jobs.

This report, prepared by IHS Global Insight as part of the US Conference of Mayors’ U.S. Metro Economy
series, highlights where we are and the challenges that lie ahead.

At the close of 2011, 125 cities and their metro areas had not seen any net job growth. By the end of last
year, the economy as a whole had regained only 30 percent of jobs lost from the Great Recession.

The outlook for 2012 is better. By the end of this year, the report forecasts that almost every one of our 363
metro economies will see job gains and the nation will have gained back 48 percent of its lost jobs. But de-
spite this progress, one thing remains clear: the recovery is slow and it’s uneven. For almost 80 of our metro
areas, it will take more than five years to get back to pre-recession levels of employment.

The report notes that consumer confidence is an important part of our recovery. When Congress fails to
reach necessary agreements on long-term debt reduction, short-term tax cuts and infrastructure spending, the
public grows cynical and disillusioned. This is not good for our economy, our cities, or our local busi-
nesses. Obstruction might be good short-term politics, but it’s bad long-term economics.

Next year cities and their metro areas will generate 90.4 percent of our Gross Domestic Product and
85.6 percent of the nation’s jobs. We are the engines of the U.S. economy, and investment in our future is an
investment in the future prosperity of our country.

If Congress will give us the tools, we will put them to use. We will get our constituents back to work and get
America’s economy humming again.

As mayors, we call on Congress to work with the President to advance initiatives that speed our nation’s
recovery and new jobs that come with it. The time for stopgaps and last minute extensions is over. It is time
for leadership.

Sincerely,

Antonio R. Villaraigosa
Mayor of Los Angeles
President
The United States Conference of Mayors
INTRODUCTION – NATIONAL ECONOMIC OUTLOOK
The recovery from the Great Recession continued in 2011, though its pace almost
stalled in the summer months, as uncertainty reigned and confidence plummeted
due to sovereign debt crises in the US and Europe. Nevertheless, the US economic
outlook has improved, with real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expected to increase
by 3.4% in the fourth quarter and 1.8% for the year once final figures are tallied.
This growth is a result of improvements in business confidence, consumer spending,
and housing starts.

However, contractionary domestic fiscal policy, slower global growth, and the
Eurozone financial crisis will still mean at least some tightening of credit conditions in
the United States. The housing sector, whose health is key to a robust recovery,
remains sluggish. Demand among young adults for new housing is tied to their
employment prospects; mortgage credit remains tight, though it has loosened a bit
in 2011; and home prices continue to fall under the pressure of foreclosures and
excess supply. Appendix Tables 8 and 9 detail the decline in home prices
experienced by most metro areas in 2011. For the US, house prices are estimated to
have fallen by 4% over the course of the year. This decline in home values further
reduced household wealth by over $500 billion, adding to pressures on consumer
spending. It also further stresses the property tax base of local governments going
forward.

Even with a stronger domestic performance, the recession risk for the U.S. thus
remains uncomfortably high, at 30%. IHS Global Insight predicts a mild recession in
the Eurozone in 2011 - 2012. However, the Eurozone recession is not expected to be
severe enough to tip the United States into recession. It will primarily impact export
demand and corporate earnings of US firms.

While employment growth over the last few months of the year was not as weak as
first feared, it was still sluggish, at just 137,000 jobs per month on average in the
last quarter. The unemployment rate has finally started to edge down, to 8.5% in
December 2011. While encouraging, we should note that some of the reduction came
from a decline in the labor force in November and December. Consumer spending,
meanwhile, has been doing far better than sentiment readings would suggest. IHS
Global Insight expects consumer spending growth of 2.2% for 2011. Suppressed
demand, as consumers have recently delayed replacement purchases, is now helping
spending to improve in areas such as vehicles, while holiday sales should also
increase substantially (up around 5% year on year in nominal dollars, very similar to
2010). However, consumers face too many headwinds to allow a robust spending
recovery after the holiday season. A weak labor market, high debt burdens, housing
prices that have not yet hit bottom, price increases that have outpaced wage growth,
and a lack of confidence in the government’s effectiveness and accountability will
keep spending growth moderate in the coming year. Inflation concerns, though, are
easing. A combination of higher gasoline prices and food prices has raised CPI

1
inflation to 3.1% this year. In addition, in the face of weak demand growth and some
pullback in commodity prices, core inflation is beginning to slow.

Real GDP is predicted to increase a soft 2.0% in 2012. As a result, IHS Global Insight
expects job growth to stay weak and the unemployment rate to remain above 8%
over the course of the year. IHS expects a modest improvement in housing starts
during 2012 (730,000 units, compared with 610,000 in 2011), concentrated in the
multifamily segment, since pent-up demand is already helping the rental market.
With less upward pressure from oil and food, we expect CPI inflation to fall back to
1.5% in 2012.

LONGER TERM RISKS


Over the longer term, IHS Global Insight expects the recovery to pick up steam, but
there are serious risks on the horizon. One concern is government budget policy. The
congressional super committee tasked with cutting $1.2 trillion off the budget deficit
over the next 10 years has failed, making budget sequester possible. Budget
sequester would mean that in 2013, mandatory and automatic spending cuts of $1.2
trillion would begin to take effect. This would come in the form of $110 billion of
budget authority per year. In the first year, $55 billion in spending cuts would be
eliminated from discretionary defense spending. Government spending has already
been declining recently, and IHS expects this to continue through 2016 at the
federal, state, and local levels. Such spending reductions put a drag on GDP; in 2012
federal, state, and local spending will decline by 2.5%, which will decrease GDP
growth by 0.5 percentage points. IHS expects the cuts to include wages and salaries,
which will in turn dampen job growth and spending.

In addition, the current sequester debate highlights how far apart Democrats and
Republicans are in their vision for government, and how drastic current levels of
gridlock remain in the U.S. federal government. Gridlock prevents government action
to adapt to the current economic situation. It has also resulted in a crisis of
confidence by the American people in their leadership. Negative perceptions of
Congress dampen consumer confidence and sentiments, which have already been
declining in recent years. IHS expects that decline to continue in the near term. The
result will be less spending and longer delays in purchasing, putting more drag on
economic growth and contributing to the sluggishness of the recovery.

Further stressing local communities in this environment is the threat to the


Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which provides federal
funding for housing, economic development, neighborhood revitalization, and other
community development activities. In a 2011 report, IHS Global Insight
"demonstrated the unique economic contributions of the CDBG grant program in
communities across the US. Our results suggest that in the last year the $3.95 billion
in grant funds generated 137,000 jobs and contributed $12.1 billion in Gross
Domestic Product, following up on the economic successes of the last decade, as well
as providing numerous valuable social benefits." Over the past two fiscal years,
CDBG funding has been reduced by $1 billion, suggesting the potential loss of 35,000
new jobs.

2
The median real income for US households in 2010 was $49,455. This is 7.1% lower
than median real household income in 1999, which was $53,252 (in 2010 dollars).
This decline has been even steeper for those in lower income groups, leading to
increased income inequality and deteriorating financial stability for many Americans.
From 1999 to 2010, income values for the bottom 10% of American earners declined
by 12.1%.

Figure 1 demonstrates the sharp deterioration in median income in the past decade.
At the same time the share of income earned by the top 20% of households
continued to increase. Since 1970 the share of the top quintile has increased from
43.3% to over half, 50.2% in 2010.

Figure 1: Median Income Through the Years

55,000 52%

50,000 49%

45,000 46%

40,000 43%

35,000 40%
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Median real income
Share of income in highest quintile

The trend of the past decade of declining median income and increasing income
inequality has continued during the recovery from the Great Recession. Median
income declined 2.3% from 2009 to 2010. Those in the bottom two-fifths of the
income distribution also had a smaller share of aggregate income in 2010 than 2009.
In 2010, the bottom 20% of households received 3.3% of the income, down from
3.4% in 2009, 3.6% in 2000, and 4.1% in 1970. These income trends are worrisome
for the health and growth of the economy. As lower-income households spend a
greater portion of their incomes as consumption, the constraint in their spending
power retards consumer demand, adding to the sluggish performance of the national
economy.

Income decline and increasing inequality is an important issue for metro areas, as
the trend in median income decline has not been experienced evenly. From 2009 to
2010, metro area households experienced a 2.2% decline in median household
income while households in rural areas did not experience a statistically significant
decline. Those living in cities saw a 3.4% decline in income while those outside cities
saw income decline by 2.4%. Appendix table 1 details metro median incomes from
2007 to 2010. In 2010 median household income ranged from $31,700 in
Brownsville, TX, to $84,500 in Washington, DC. In that year median income declined
in 216 metros.

3
An additional stress on household finances going forward is the rapid accumulation of
student loan indebtedness. With persistently high unemployment and diminished job
and career prospects for recent college graduates, these loan balances further erode
welfare and spending. The Federal Reserve estimates that student loan balances in
the second quarter of 2011 amounted to $845 billion.

METRO EMPLOYMENT IN 2012


In 2011, the US added more than 1.6 million jobs to its payrolls, growing 1.3% over
2010. This is a welcome turnaround, as the United States previously suffered three
consecutive years of net job losses as a result of the Great Recession of 2007-2009.
Throughout that period, total nonfarm payrolls contracted by 6.2% and shed over
8.6 million jobs. The detrimental and costly effects of the Great Recession have been
felt in all 363 metropolitan statistical areas that we measure. Consider Los Angeles,
which saw over 500,000 jobs disappear in just three years. A brighter day is dawning
in the US, however - by the end of 2012, US total nonfarm payrolls will have grown
by another 1.3%, and the nation will have regained 48% of the jobs lost in the
recession, putting itself on solid footing to maintain strong positive growth in 2013
and beyond. Figure 2 illustrates the year in which each metro will regain the jobs lost
since its pre-recessionary peak employment. At this time only 26 metro areas have
completely recovered jobs lost in the recession. By the end of 2012, another 26 will
have, and an additional 99 will have recouped over one-half of their losses. But for
almost 80 metros, full recovery is over five years away. The recovery is very uneven
across US regions, with the southeastern and southwestern metros, who were most
affected by the housing bubble, looking ahead to years of recovery.

Figure 2: Return to Peak Employment for Metro Areas

PEAK
2010 to 2011
2012 to 2013
2014 to 2015
2016 to 2017
Past 2017

4
This is the most protracted period of underemployment in US economic history since
the Great Depression and World War II. All subsequent recessions in the 20th century
saw payroll jobs quickly regain previous peak levels with a strong first year of
economic recovery. In 2001, however, a shallow recession was followed by a
'jobless' recovery. Job losses did continue after the economy began to grow, but all
losses were recouped within two years of employment growth, four years after the
downturn began. The recovery from the most recent recession is now passing both of
those benchmarks, with two years of job gains, and four years since the start of the
downturn, yet less than 30% of lost jobs have been recovered by the end of 2011.

In 2011, US metros saw a wide range of employment growth. For example Victoria,
TX and Hot Springs, AZ expanded by greater than 6.0%, while Missoula, MT and
Dalton, GA both contracted by more than 4.5%. Thirty-five metros registered job
growth higher than 3.0%, and 122 (33%) metros posted growth above the national
average of 1.3% in 2011. Meanwhile, 241 (67%) US metros fell below the 1.3%
growth mark, including 125 metros that did not see positive gains at all.

Figure 3: Employment Growth Across Metro Areas, End of 2012

In contrast to the 125 metro areas that shrunk in 2011, all but three of the nation’s
metros will experience positive employment growth during 2012 (see appendix table
2). Led by Myrtle Beach, SC with a 3.0% payroll expansion, 181 (50%) of the metro
areas will at least match average of 1.3% growth in 2012. The remaining 179 metros
will all show positive growth between 0.1% and 1.3% (see figure 3).

5
Job growth in 2012 will come predominantly through several important sectors:
education and health services, trade, transportation, and utilities, and professional
and business services (see figure 4). The trade, transportation, and utilities sector
contracted during the recession, but will maintain the positive growth of 2011 and
post 563,000 new jobs, growing a respectable 2.3% over the next year. Education
and health services, which was relatively unaffected by the mass layoffs seen in
other industries during the recession, will grow at a rate of 2.4% over 2012 and add
478,000 jobs. Another important sector, which will make up for much of the losses
seen in sectors such as government and construction, is the high-paying professional
and business services sector. This sector will add almost 400,000 jobs and grow at a
rate of 2.3% over the year. Metro areas that have a high concentration in these
industries will benefit the most from this employment growth. While these sectors
will show the most significant growth, virtually all areas are projected to add jobs in
2012. In fact, the government sector, due to practical fiscal belt-tightening, and
construction, natural resources, and mining, due to a continued housing slump, will
be the only industries to shrink.

Figure 4: US Employment By Sector (Thous.), End of 2012


2011Q4 2012Q4 Diff
Total Nonfarm 131,553 133,315 1,762
Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 24,990 25,553 563
Educational and Health Services 20,166 20,644 478
Professional and Business Services 17,304 17,708 404
Leisure and Hospitality 13,379 13,678 300
Manufacturing 11,723 11,911 187
Financial Activities 7,557 7,644 87
Construction, Natural Resources, Mining 6,259 6,123 -135
Government 22,146 21,950 -196
Of the nation’s 363 metro areas, 11 of the top 50 largest are located within the
South Atlantic Region. Many of these metros, especially in Florida and South
Carolina, will see a boost in their services industries in 2012, particularly the
tourism-related segments. The upswing in tourism, along with the amelioration of
major losses in the local housing market, will help give the Miami-Fort Lauderdale
metro’s professonal and business services sector, for example, 3.2% job growth and
13,800 new jobs in 2012.

Another boost for South Atlantic metros will come from the Columbia and Panama
free-trade pacts recently signed, which will spur growth in South Florida with
increased levels of trade from Latin America. Indeed, both the Miami and Tampa-St.
Petersburg areas of Florida will both expand payrolls by 1.7% (see Appendix Table
2), thanks in large part to the trade and transportation sector picking up steam in
2012 (2.9% and 2,5%, respectively). Nearby Atlanta, Georgia will also benefit; it has
among the highest concentrations of workers in wholesale trade and transportation
services in the country. That sector will grow 2.8% in Atlanta over the next year, and
will produce nearly half of all the jobs in what is the seventh largest metro in the US.
An efficient and well-designed transportation infrastructure has also created a

6
growing and stable trade sector in the Charlotte and other North and South Carolina
metros.

Sharp contractions in government payrolls, however, will have both direct and
indirect negative impacts in Maryland, Virginia, and DC--areas that during the Great
Recession benefited by an expansion of federal jobs. Despite these losses, Baltimore
and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metros will experience overall positive
employment growth in 2012 of 1.1% each due to major additions to the education,
health, professional and business services sectors.

In the Middle Atlantic and New England regions, education and health services and
professional business services will be the main drivers in employment growth for
New York, Philadelphia, and Boston as they grow total employment by 1.7%, 1.5%,
and 1.1% respectively. The healthcare sector continues to be a bright spot in the
region; New York and Pennsylvania have the third and fourth highest concentrations
of healthcare jobs, respectively, in the nation. Equally important to New England is
the educational services sector, as the greater Boston metro is home to several
prominent universities that act as major employers for the area. Not only do these
universities provide jobs, they also create a highly educated workforce to meet the
demand for rapidly expanding professional and business services in New England.

In the Pittsburgh metro and surrounding area, the natural resources and mining
sector grew 5.8% in 2011 as a result of Marcellus Shale prospects. Drilling and
extraction from this shale has the potential to bring significant new and sustainable
growth in natural resource and mining employment for not only Pittsburgh, but
smaller regional metros such as Youngstown, Ohio; Binghamton, New York; and
Wheeling, West Virginia.

From the automotive assembly lines in Michigan, to metal mining and fabrication in
Ohio, manufacturing is the dominant industry in the East North Central region.
Although this sector has been on the decline for over a decade in the nation’s Rust
Belt, durable manufacturing employment payrolls grew 4.1% in 2011 and will
expand by another 3.2% in 2012. The momentum provided by this uptick in
manufacturing has spread to other sectors. For example, often overlooked in the
Detroit-Warren-Livonia metro are its large services sectors. Following 2011’s addition
of almost 7,000 net new jobs and 2.2% growth in professional and business services,
the overall services sectors, including education, health, and hospitality will add
8,000 jobs in 2012. Education and health services will play a major role in sustaining
employment growth in the Minneapolis-St. Paul and Cleveland metros. In 2011, this
sector experienced growth of 1.7% in Cleveland, and in 2012 the sector will see
more robust growth of 2.4%, which will translate into over 4,000 jobs. Minneapolis-
St. Paul will build on 2.7% growth in 2011, expanding healthcare services payrolls by
2.8% in 2012 and adding 7,500 jobs.

Other East North Central states, such as Illinois and Wisconsin, are more
economically diverse. The Chicago-Naperville-Joliet metro will add the most jobs
(58,500) of any metro in the region. Not only does Chicago have a large and diverse

7
financial sector, where over 30 Fortune 500 companies are headquartered, but it also
continues to be home to a main transportation hub and a strong services industry. It
is this diversity that has insulated the area from the economic woes of a traditionally
manufacturing dependent region.

From the Marcellus Shale in the Northeast to the Barnett Shale in northern Texas,
natural resources and mining is projected to grow strongly. But energy-rich states
such as Texas and Oklahoma in the West South Central region will also expand in
other areas. For example the Dallas-Fort Worth metro has become the Southwest’s
largest wholesale trade center, and one of the region’s major retail hubs. The trade
and transportation sectors will contribute over 17,000 new jobs in 2012, helping total
payrolls rise at a rate of 1.9%. In Houston, trade and transportation will grow 2.9%
and add 15,000 jobs as the Port of Houston gains a larger share of trade from fast-
growing emerging markets--a benefit in part from the expansion of the Panama
Canal.

The West South Central region will also see robust growth in the services industries.
In 2012, professional business services will add 12,800 jobs in the Dallas-Fort Worth
metro growing at 2.8%, 10,500 jobs in the Houston metro growing 2.8%, and 1,900
jobs in Oklahoma City metro at 2.4% growth. These three metro economies will also
be augmented by 23,400 new education and health services workers.

Throughout the Mountain and West North Central regions, prosperity due to the
recent boom in on-shore oil and gas production will have both positive direct and
indirect effects for the regions and the metros contained within. The Denver metro,
for instance, is slated to post 1.6% total employment growth in 2012. Thanks to its
central location, Denver is a major transportation and distribution hub, and the
metro’s improved economic growth is a result of its largest sector: trade,
transportation, and utilities. This sector will add 6,300 jobs and grow at a rate of
2.7%. The Phoenix metro, supported by a growing retiree population and a subdued
local housing market will also expand the trade and transportation sector by 13,600
jobs, growing 3.8% in 2012.

The Pacific region continues to be an attractive hot spot for skilled labor such as
scientists, engineers, and software programmers, which drives employment growth
in the professional and business services sector that supports them. In 2012, Los
Angeles will see growth in most of its major employment sectors adding 57,500 jobs
and growing 1.1%. Leading the way will be services: education health, professional
and business and leisure and hospitality – all of which will post payroll increases of
over 13,000 new jobs on the year. Similarly in the Seattle metro, the professional
and business services will round out 2011 by adding 16,000 on the year–an
impressive 7.2% rate of growth from the third largest sector in the area. This
expansion will continue in 2012 with 7,000 new jobs and 3.0% growth. Seattle will
also boast significant growth from transportation and trade in which 7,400 new jobs
in 2012 (2.4%) will be added on top of the 5,800 in 2011 (1.9%).

8
On the heels of 1.3% growth and 1.6 million new jobs added to US payrolls in 2011,
the US is poised to make significant strides in 2012, beginning the climb out of the
hole dug during the Great Recession. Although important sectors such as
manufacturing may never return to previous levels of employment, and construction
and government continue to be weak, other sectors will pick up the slack. From New
York to Los Angeles, the 1.3% growth and 1.7 million additional jobs forecast for
2012 will largely come in the resilient education and health services sector, and the
trade, transportation, and burgeoning professional and business sectors.

METROPOLITAN AREA EXPORTS


Over the past two decades, the merchandise value of manufactured exports in the
US has tripled, reaching $1.28 trillion in 2010, or 8.8% of GDP — up from 6.9% in
1990. International trade is a key economic support for metropolitan areas, and has
been one of the few fiscal bright spots as the nation slowly emerges from the
recession. International trade connects metros with fast-growing and developing
countries and adds diversity from purely domestic demand. It supports local
manufacturers and creates jobs in the warehousing, logistics, and transportation
industries. Foreign trade increases competition, requiring firms to be more efficient
and innovative. It also encourages specialization and economies of scale, improving
quality and prices of goods sold. Overall, trade helps markets allocate resources in
the most efficient way. It is no surprise then that metro economies, already centers
for innovation and efficiency, dominate the US export industry and stand to gain the
most from global trade.

Figure 5: Nation's Largest Metros are the Top Exporters


2010 Level Rank
GMP Exports
New York-Nrthrn New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 1 1
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 2 3
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 3 7
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 4 22
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 5 2
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6 10
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 7 9
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 8 13
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 9 11
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 10 17
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 11 5
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 12 6
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 13 12
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 14 4
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 15 28
Source: Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis
Note: export values through the first half of 2010

9
Metro areas are the US export leaders. Similar to their share of employment and
output, they account for 88% of the nation's exports. The largest metros are also our
top exporters (see figure 5), with the 20 biggest metro economies comprising 50%
of the total US share. Comprehensive historical export data for metros is limited, but
just over the last few years foreign trade has grown tremendously in metros. From
2005-2008, export merchandise value increased in 300 metros, expanded by over
50% in 168 metros, and doubled in 70.

Outside of the size of the export market, the relationship of export merchandise
value to gross metro product (GMP) provides further perspective on the relative
importance of international trade (appendix table 6)1. For many small metros, the
impact on their local economy is enormous. Out of the top 15 metro export/GMP
ratios, only three are among the 100 largest metro areas (see figure 6).
International trade encourages specialization and economies of scale, which is more
pronounced in smaller metros, which tend to focus on one or two types of export
products. For example, Peoria, Illinois and Davenport, Iowa, the headquarters of
Caterpillar and John Deere, respectively, rely on machinery for the bulk of their
exports. A number of other metros specialize in the shipment of a single type of
export product, including Detroit and Kokomo, Indiana, both in transportation
equipment; Victoria, Texas and Kingsport, Tennessee, in chemicals; Burlington,
Vermont in computers/electronics; Sioux City, Iowa in food; and Racine, Wisconsin in
machinery.

While much has been made about the jobs lost from overseas competition, strong
foreign markets also serve as a key consumer of US-made goods. It is true that
many of the low-skill labor-intensive manufacturing jobs have been offshored, but
there are many metros that produce capital-intensive durable goods for largely
foreign markets. In the 15 metros in figure 6, there are 12 where the concentration
of manufacturing jobs tops 10%, and 8 have manufacturing employment
concentrations ranking in the top 100. These manufacturing sectors would suffer if
their export markets were not as large.

Canada, Mexico, and China are the largest US export destinations and contribute
19.5%, 12.8%, and 7.2% of total merchandise value, respectively. Clearly, location
matters — the two US border countries account for a third of our total exports. The
size of the market is also important, which is why China overtook Japan in 2007 to
become the third largest export destination.

1
It is important to put the export data in context with GMP, which is a value-added figure and estimated
with more precision than export merchandise value. The export data series excludes service exports and is
collected through origin-of-movement, zip code-based data. The origin-of-movement calculation is not a
perfect representation of the local benefits created by trade activity because only final sales value is
counted (omitting intermediate goods that could come outside the export area), and in cases where goods
are consolidated, the merchandise value is assigned to the location of the consolidation point. This means
that export values in metro areas that serve as primary warehousing points can be overstated, which is
apparent in a few metros that specialize in warehousing/distribution. While this series is thus prone to
some statistical noise, it offers a glimpse into the importance of international trade (see appendix table 6).

10
Figure 6: Top Export-to-GMP Ratios
2010Q2, %
Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 59.9
Peoria, IL 51.6
Longview, WA 35.5
El Paso, TX 35.0
Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 33.5
Kokomo, IN 33.5
Burlington-South Burlington, VT 31.1
Victoria, TX 30.5
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 29.0
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 27.9
Janesville, WI 27.4
Savannah, GA 26.9
Racine, WI 26.2
Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 25.7
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 22.2
With the exception of Seattle, all of the top exporters located in the northern portion
of the US send the largest share of their goods to Canada (see figure 7). The top
exporters in the south are not as homogenized. Mexico is the leading destination for
Houston and Los Angeles, but Canada is Dallas' top destination, while Miami ships
most of its exports to Latin America. About half of these top exporters have a diverse
set of trade destinations, such as Miami, Boston, and New York, while others like
Detroit rely on their top few trading partners for most of their exports.

Figure 7: Top Metropolitan Exporter Destinations, %


Top Share of
Country Total Top 3
New York-Northern NJ-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Canada 12.3 25.3
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Mexico 13.4 29.2
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Mexico 21.8 45.3
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Canada 37.0 76.7
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL Venezuela 9.8 22.9
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA China 13.8 32.3
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI Canada 32.7 50.8
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA South Korea 12.3 30.2
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Canada 25.4 50.2
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Canada 15.4 35.6
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Canada 11.0 28.7
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Canada 22.1 44.8

11
Metropolitan Ports: Exports and Imports

It is important to take a broad view of foreign trade by also looking at imports. The
US runs a trade deficit, meaning that the value of goods entering the country
exceeds the value of those leaving. In an increasingly globalized economy, American
consumers rely on more and more imported goods each year. In 2010, the dollar
value of imports totaled $1.91 trillion, or about 13.1% of US GDP. Meanwhile,
American companies exported $1.28 trillion, or about 8.8% of GDP. To handle the
total $3.19 trillion of shipments entering and leaving the country, massive
infrastructure is required to ensure that goods move quickly and efficiently. US ports
are at the center of these operations, and the largest ports reside in the nation's key
metro areas.

To focus on port activity we looked at the US customs districts, which are clusters of
air, vessel, and freight facilities that work as foreign trade zones and ports of entry.
In terms of the merchandise value of imports and exports, New York City leads the
nation, just ahead of Los Angeles. The Houston custom district is the leader in the
south and third largest in the nation, while Detroit ranks fourth. The top 15 customs
districts handle 75% of the total merchandise value entering and leaving the nation.

Figure 8: Top US Custom Districts


Merchandise Value, Mil $, YTD 2011Q3
Total
Export Value Import Value Value
New York City, NY  121,460 169,067 290,526 
Los Angeles, CA  90,533 196,557 287,090 
Houston‐Galveston, TX  87,136 111,235 198,371 
Detroit, MI  92,329 89,448 181,778 
New Orleans, LA  60,997 113,326 174,323 
Laredo, TX  70,650 89,791 160,441 
Chicago, IL  27,123 102,692 129,814 
Savannah, GA  36,739 56,996 93,735 
Seattle, WA  50,271 42,943 93,214 
San Francisco, CA  37,074 52,226 89,300 
Miami, FL  50,822 31,931 82,753 
Cleveland, OH  21,946 58,087 80,033 
Buffalo, NY  35,180 31,475 66,655 
Philadelphia, PA  12,871 51,120 63,991 
El Paso, TX  25,837 35,054 60,891 

Most customs districts import more than they export. Out of the 15 biggest, only 4
are net exporters. Even in custom districts primarily involved in importing, however,
jobs are created. The movement of goods into the country requires labor involved in
logistics, transportation, and warehousing. Businesses also cluster near ports,

12
offering them convenient access to shipping routes. Many of the nation's largest
cities sprung up around ports, and they will continue to be vital economic drivers in
the nation's metropolitan areas.

Looking ahead, export growth will continue to dominate import growth, supported by
robust emerging economies and a competitive dollar. Export values will increase
13.5% in 2011 while imports grow by 12.9%, this on the heels of double-digit
growth last year. Indeed, in the two years following the 2009 collapse, foreign trade
has grown vigorously. IHS Global Insight expects trade to soften in 2012, with
export values increasing only 4.2% while import values rise 3.2% as softening
growth abroad, including the economic turbulence in the Eurozone, curb trade
activity. Over the longer-term, export growth will be strong, averaging 7.9%
annually over the next five years, outpacing imports, which will advance by 5.2%.
This will chip away at the US trade deficit and open up more opportunities for local
firms to sell goods globally.

CONCLUSION
The US economy is recovering slowly, but surely, from the Great Recession. This
growth is being led by metro areas, once again the engines of US economic growth.
In 2011, metros led US growth, gaining 2.2% to boost national growth to 1.8%.
Metros now contribute 90.4% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product. Metros now
account for 85.6% of jobs in the nation.

This report has documented the crucial role metro areas play in enabling the nation
reap the benefits of international trade. Demand for US exports will be a vital driver
of economic growth in the coming decades. Exports will be more important than ever
in this decade of retrenching consumers and governments, both burdened by
massive debt. Policy makers need to be aware that the maintenance and
development of metro economies' continued ability to generate the economic activity
derived from exports is essential for the nation to prosper.

13
Appendix Tables

IHS Global Insight


Table of Contents

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thousand $ 1

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas 10

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012 19

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012 31

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Million $ 40

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product 48

Table 7: Largest Ports by US Customs District 56

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area (Dollars $) 57

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area (Ranked by Population, Dollars, $) 66

IHS Global Insight


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

1 Abilene, TX 39.4 42.0 42.9 40.6


2 Akron, OH 47.9 50.0 47.5 46.5
3 Albuquerque, NM 45.3 47.2 46.8 47.4
4 Alexandria, LA 37.2 42.6 39.5 40.0
5 Albany, GA 36.4 39.0 36.2 34.0
6 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 55.0 58.8 56.8 55.6
7 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 55.1 58.8 57.7 55.8
8 Altoona, PA 42.5 40.3 38.4 43.0
9 Amarillo, TX 42.1 47.8 43.4 46.4
10 Ames, IA 47.8 48.1 45.5 48.1
11 Anchorage, AK 68.0 75.0 72.7 71.5
12 Anderson, IN 42.8 44.1 41.7 38.8
13 Ann Arbor, MI 61.0 57.8 54.6 55.9
14 Anniston-Oxford, AL 37.1 40.1 36.5 36.7
15 Anderson, SC 40.8 45.2 41.3 36.8
16 Appleton, WI 56.8 54.8 55.7 55.9
17 Asheville, NC 43.8 43.2 41.1 42.2
18 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 55.8 52.7 52.9 52.6
19 Athens-Clarke County, GA 40.8 41.4 39.0 40.4
20 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 57.2 60.7 55.5 53.2
21 Auburn-Opelika, AL 39.4 41.8 36.9 39.4
22 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 43.8 44.3 42.1 44.5
23 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 56.7 59.2 56.2 55.7
24 Bakersfield-Delano, CA 47.1 44.7 47.4 45.5
25 Baltimore-Towson, MD 63.7 66.1 65.4 64.8
26 Bangor, ME 41.3 42.9 39.9 43.0
27 Barnstable Town, MA 60.0 57.3 58.0 55.3
28 Baton Rouge, LA 44.7 48.5 47.8 48.3
29 Battle Creek, MI 41.1 41.2 38.5 43.0
30 Bay City, MI 42.4 45.9 44.0 45.5
31 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 43.6 47.8 43.9 41.3
32 Bellingham, WA 46.5 47.1 46.5 50.0
33 Bend, OR 55.9 51.5 52.3 44.6
34 Billings, MT 48.3 50.1 46.4 48.0
35 Binghamton, NY 45.2 45.2 44.3 46.0
36 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 47.2 49.3 44.9 44.2
37 Bismarck, ND 50.6 53.6 55.8 53.4
38 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 39.5 41.4 40.6 40.1
39 Bloomington-Normal, IL 54.1 58.1 56.0 59.6
40 Bloomington, IN 39.6 39.7 37.4 38.2
41 Boise City-Nampa, ID 49.9 52.0 48.3 47.3
42 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 68.1 71.4 69.3 68.0
43 Boulder, CO 63.3 66.5 63.4 61.9
44 Bowling Green, KY 41.2 42.2 41.1 39.1
45 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 57.5 59.3 60.9 56.3

IHS Global Insight 1


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

46 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 80.3 84.5 79.1 74.8


47 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 29.3 30.6 30.9 31.7
48 Brunswick, GA 45.5 47.3 42.2 39.1
49 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 44.8 47.9 45.8 46.4
50 Burlington, NC 41.5 42.8 42.7 41.1
51 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 56.9 60.5 58.2 54.7
52 Canton-Massillon, OH 44.9 44.5 44.0 42.4
53 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 50.7 50.8 45.4 43.9
54 Carson City, NV 50.9 51.5 57.8 52.4
55 Casper, WY 43.8 50.8 56.3 51.7
56 Cedar Rapids, IA 52.0 53.7 53.3 53.8
57 Champaign-Urbana, IL 44.9 46.6 41.8 45.9
58 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 53.2 55.0 51.3 50.4
59 Chattanooga, TN-GA 43.2 45.3 40.7 42.3
60 Cheyenne, WY 52.5 56.8 49.8 48.8
61 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 59.3 61.3 58.7 57.1
62 Chico, CA 39.5 40.1 41.8 41.7
63 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 49.8 52.3 48.2 48.1
64 Charlottesville, VA 53.4 56.8 55.8 56.8
65 Charleston, WV 39.8 42.9 42.1 43.9
66 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 52.0 54.1 51.8 51.6
67 Clarksville, TN-KY 45.2 44.2 41.7 42.3
68 Cleveland, TN 38.0 39.0 38.4 37.2
69 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 48.2 49.2 45.4 46.2
70 Coeur d`Alene, ID 46.7 50.0 47.5 42.3
71 Columbus, IN 54.4 50.9 49.4 47.2
72 College Station-Bryan, TX 38.2 37.7 34.1 36.0
73 Colorado Springs, CO 55.3 58.9 55.2 51.7
74 Columbus, GA-AL 41.9 38.5 40.4 36.5
75 Columbia, MO 44.8 46.8 46.4 40.8
76 Columbus, OH 51.7 54.4 50.8 51.0
77 Corpus Christi, TX 40.6 45.9 42.3 42.0
78 Corvallis, OR 45.6 53.5 44.6 46.0
79 Columbia, SC 47.6 48.8 47.6 45.9
80 Cumberland, MD-WV 35.6 41.7 36.3 34.8
81 Danville, IL 37.2 41.5 35.0 38.2
82 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 54.7 56.4 54.5 54.4
83 Dalton, GA 36.4 42.9 38.0 39.5
84 Danville, VA 33.2 34.8 34.5 36.0
85 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 45.9 49.0 50.5 46.3
86 Dayton, OH 46.5 48.2 45.2 43.8
87 Decatur, AL 42.6 47.0 37.7 42.2
88 Decatur, IL 44.8 45.6 44.1 40.9
89 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 42.3 46.1 41.5 41.6
90 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 58.9 60.3 59.0 58.7

IHS Global Insight 2


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

91 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 55.8 57.9 56.6 54.7


92 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 52.5 52.5 48.5 48.2
93 Dothan, AL 36.6 40.7 35.9 38.6
94 Dover, DE 46.8 56.0 51.5 54.7
95 Dubuque, IA 46.3 49.0 46.6 49.8
96 Duluth, MN-WI 42.6 44.7 44.6 42.1
97 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 48.4 52.4 49.9 48.0
98 Eau Claire, WI 45.4 49.4 44.6 44.1
99 El Centro, CA 31.9 37.9 38.6 41.8
100 Elizabethtown, KY 48.1 47.4 45.2 42.4
101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 48.0 49.5 42.8 41.8
102 Elmira, NY 39.8 41.6 43.7 47.7
103 El Paso, TX 35.0 36.5 36.2 36.0
104 Erie, PA 42.4 44.2 42.9 42.5
105 Eugene-Springfield, OR 43.1 43.3 39.9 40.3
106 Evansville, IN-KY 46.2 43.3 46.5 44.3
107 Fairbanks, AK 65.3 69.1 70.6 60.8
108 Fayetteville, NC 42.8 44.1 40.5 43.5
109 Fargo, ND-MN 44.5 46.5 45.5 50.1
110 Farmington, NM 43.7 47.1 47.1 45.1
111 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 44.5 44.0 44.2 45.1
112 Flagstaff, AZ 49.6 47.4 50.8 42.1
113 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 37.0 39.4 37.7 37.6
114 Flint, MI 43.1 44.6 41.4 38.8
115 Florence, SC 40.9 40.3 38.3 37.6
116 Fond du Lac, WI 50.0 52.9 50.2 49.7
117 Fresno, CA 47.3 43.7 45.7 45.2
118 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 52.1 56.3 55.7 54.2
119 Fort Smith, AR-OK 36.7 38.7 36.6 38.0
120 Fort Wayne, IN 48.3 48.6 47.1 47.0
121 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 55.5 56.1 49.2 51.5
122 Gadsden, AL 34.6 37.6 39.1 35.9
123 Gainesville, FL 38.0 42.4 37.6 40.3
124 Gainesville, GA 51.8 52.8 49.0 47.0
125 Glens Falls, NY 45.4 48.3 51.1 50.9
126 Goldsboro, NC 40.1 39.4 40.9 40.8
127 Green Bay, WI 51.4 52.5 50.3 49.0
128 Greeley, CO 52.1 56.1 54.7 52.0
129 Greensboro-High Point, NC 42.5 45.2 41.3 41.1
130 Great Falls, MT 42.9 42.7 40.5 41.9
131 Grand Forks, ND-MN 43.9 46.6 42.3 46.1
132 Grand Junction, CO 51.0 55.7 52.9 46.2
133 Greenville, NC 36.3 40.0 36.1 39.7
134 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 49.0 49.9 47.1 47.0
135 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 45.2 45.1 43.3 42.6

IHS Global Insight 3


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

136 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 41.5 44.9 43.0 41.9


137 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 51.6 50.5 48.6 50.5
138 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 46.8 51.0 44.5 44.6
139 Harrisonburg, VA 44.2 48.8 42.7 45.2
140 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 53.2 57.1 53.0 54.0
141 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 64.4 67.2 65.7 63.1
142 Hattiesburg, MS 37.5 36.8 40.5 38.5
143 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 39.4 41.4 37.3 39.4
144 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 41.6 40.3 44.2 37.5
145 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 53.9 55.5 51.0 53.1
146 Honolulu, HI 65.4 71.0 67.7 68.5
147 Hot Springs, AR 34.9 36.9 37.7 36.5
148 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 42.0 51.1 47.7 48.2
149 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 53.0 56.2 54.2 53.9
150 Huntsville, AL 50.6 53.4 54.6 52.4
151 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 34.9 35.5 36.1 36.0
152 Idaho Falls, ID 50.5 52.2 49.0 50.2
153 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 53.1 53.7 50.4 48.9
154 Iowa City, IA 51.3 53.8 48.8 48.4
155 Ithaca, NY 43.4 48.6 45.0 52.1
156 Jackson, MI 43.3 46.9 46.7 42.8
157 Jackson, MS 44.4 46.1 44.1 42.5
158 Janesville, WI 48.7 51.4 49.0 46.8
159 Jackson, TN 37.3 42.6 39.0 40.5
160 Jefferson City, MO 44.7 55.2 50.6 51.7
161 Johnson City, TN 35.9 40.8 34.5 36.8
162 Johnstown, PA 37.5 38.1 38.9 41.2
163 Jonesboro, AR 37.1 36.9 36.8 35.5
164 Joplin, MO 38.6 39.6 38.5 38.5
165 Jacksonville, FL 51.9 54.5 50.0 50.3
166 Jacksonville, NC 42.2 48.0 41.2 41.8
167 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 44.0 45.8 41.1 43.7
168 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 46.4 50.5 50.9 44.8
169 Kansas City, MO-KS 53.5 56.5 54.5 53.9
170 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA 50.7 51.5 54.0 56.4
171 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 47.3 49.8 44.9 49.8
172 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 57.1 54.8 56.5 51.3
173 Kingston, NY 36.5 39.1 36.3 34.7
174 Knoxville, TN 44.3 45.4 45.2 43.1
175 Kokomo, IN 45.0 48.1 47.6 41.2
176 Lake Charles, LA 42.2 45.7 44.3 40.2
177 La Crosse, WI-MN 48.2 48.8 50.1 47.7
178 Lafayette, LA 43.3 46.3 47.4 46.7
179 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 40.0 38.3 41.0 36.4
180 Lafayette, IN 41.8 45.4 41.6 40.6

IHS Global Insight 4


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

181 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 44.3 44.4 41.9 41.2


182 Lancaster, PA 52.8 55.9 55.7 51.7
183 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 58.0 60.3 58.5 56.7
184 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 48.0 49.6 47.7 47.7
185 Laredo, TX 33.9 36.7 38.3 35.8
186 Las Cruces, NM 35.3 36.0 35.7 35.2
187 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 56.0 56.7 53.5 51.4
188 Lawrence, KS 42.8 46.4 43.4 47.3
189 Lawton, OK 43.7 39.2 47.9 43.8
190 Lebanon, PA 46.7 52.6 50.7 51.4
191 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 46.4 45.2 43.1 41.2
192 Lewiston, ID-WA 41.4 44.8 40.0 40.0
193 Lexington-Fayette, KY 47.1 50.7 46.7 46.3
194 Lima, OH 44.0 44.2 37.8 41.1
195 Lincoln, NE 49.2 52.6 47.9 50.1
196 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 45.8 45.3 46.0 46.0
197 Logan, UT-ID 45.4 49.1 45.3 46.2
198 Longview, TX 41.3 45.0 43.7 41.8
199 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 45.7 48.7 46.8 44.7
200 Longview, WA 44.1 47.4 45.5 41.0
201 Lubbock, TX 41.5 44.8 39.1 42.1
202 Lynchburg, VA 42.1 44.4 44.8 41.2
203 Macon, GA 39.9 42.6 39.4 37.5
204 Madera-Chowchilla, CA 45.0 47.4 44.1 48.3
205 Madison, WI 59.7 60.9 56.7 57.6
206 Manchester-Nashua, NH 67.7 69.2 64.7 68.3
207 Mansfield, OH 43.4 42.6 39.3 41.6
208 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 30.3 30.2 30.4 33.7
209 Medford, OR 44.5 40.6 46.0 40.2
210 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 45.7 46.2 43.6 45.4
211 Merced, CA 44.4 42.3 39.5 42.5
212 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 49.2 49.3 46.0 45.4
213 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 43.5 45.6 46.2 43.8
214 Midland, TX 51.2 57.6 55.0 53.2
215 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 52.0 54.4 52.0 49.8
216 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 63.9 65.9 63.1 62.4
217 Missoula, MT 42.8 42.3 39.0 45.6
218 Mobile, AL 37.4 41.1 40.0 40.0
219 Modesto, CA 50.6 50.4 48.7 48.1
220 Monroe, LA 36.5 38.1 37.8 37.8
221 Monroe, MI 53.8 57.2 52.8 50.0
222 Montgomery, AL 43.0 46.4 44.3 45.5
223 Morgantown, WV 39.3 43.0 34.5 43.5
224 Morristown, TN 37.0 37.2 35.1 37.1
225 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 51.6 53.4 54.9 55.5

IHS Global Insight 5


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

226 Muncie, IN 37.7 38.9 34.8 35.9


227 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 39.1 40.8 38.3 38.6
228 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 43.2 42.3 41.3 41.6
229 Napa, CA 62.1 65.2 68.6 64.4
230 Naples-Marco Island, FL 57.7 61.2 53.0 52.7
231 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 50.8 51.8 51.1 48.0
232 New Haven-Milford, CT 59.9 61.6 60.6 57.1
233 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 48.1 47.6 46.2 46.1
234 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 42.1 42.5 39.5 40.3
235 Norwich-New London, CT 61.1 68.6 64.1 62.4
236 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 61.6 64.7 62.9 61.9
237 Ocala, FL 39.3 40.2 39.0 37.0
238 Ocean City, NJ 52.0 60.2 50.2 53.4
239 Odessa, TX 46.6 50.2 44.1 42.3
240 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 59.0 59.2 60.2 59.2
241 Oklahoma City, OK 45.2 47.7 45.1 46.2
242 Olympia, WA 57.8 62.5 58.5 61.0
243 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 52.9 55.0 52.3 54.1
244 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 50.9 50.4 46.9 46.5
245 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 50.4 53.2 46.5 48.2
246 Owensboro, KY 41.7 41.6 42.3 41.0
247 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 73.3 76.9 71.7 71.9
248 Palm Coast, FL 41.8 46.6 50.2 44.0
249 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 50.4 49.4 45.4 46.3
250 Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL 49.0 45.7 44.4 44.9
251 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 39.7 42.3 39.4 40.4
252 Pascagoula, MS 43.7 51.5 48.0 44.9
253 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 44.5 46.2 45.5 44.0
254 Peoria, IL 50.6 52.5 49.9 51.0
255 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 58.3 60.9 60.1 58.1
256 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 54.3 55.9 52.8 50.4
257 Pine Bluff, AR 34.2 37.5 33.2 33.4
258 Pittsfield, MA 47.3 44.8 42.3 44.2
259 Pittsburgh, PA 45.6 47.8 46.3 46.7
260 Pocatello, ID 43.9 49.3 45.4 39.1
261 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 54.0 54.4 53.8 56.5
262 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 55.4 58.8 55.5 53.1
263 Port St. Lucie, FL 49.7 46.9 46.2 41.3
264 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 66.0 70.7 69.1 67.3
265 Prescott, AZ 44.4 41.8 40.4 40.3
266 Provo-Orem, UT 57.3 59.5 57.5 54.2
267 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 54.0 55.9 54.2 51.9
268 Pueblo, CO 41.6 42.6 38.8 38.3
269 Punta Gorda, FL 46.7 46.4 40.4 42.0
270 Racine, WI 51.4 54.5 51.7 51.4

IHS Global Insight 6


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

271 Raleigh-Cary, NC 58.1 61.9 59.3 57.8


272 Rapid City, SD 44.4 44.8 46.2 47.1
273 Reading, PA 52.8 54.6 53.5 51.8
274 Redding, CA 41.9 42.1 42.9 41.0
275 Reno-Sparks, NV 54.3 57.7 52.7 50.7
276 Richmond, VA 56.7 58.7 55.6 55.3
277 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 57.3 56.5 53.8 53.6
278 Roanoke, VA 46.9 46.4 46.3 45.6
279 Rockford, IL 49.7 49.8 45.7 45.5
280 Rome, GA 43.0 41.6 39.0 36.9
281 Rochester, MN 58.7 63.8 62.5 59.7
282 Rocky Mount, NC 41.0 39.2 36.4 38.1
283 Rochester, NY 50.5 52.4 50.3 50.2
284 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 58.4 61.5 59.1 56.8
285 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 59.7 61.0 57.4 56.2
286 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 63.8 67.5 61.5 61.1
287 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 61.8 63.0 60.2 59.9
288 Santa Fe, NM 51.4 55.5 52.7 47.1
289 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 43.0 41.4 39.2 42.0
290 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 83.8 88.1 84.5 84.0
291 Salem, OR 43.7 48.4 44.9 45.6
292 Salinas, CA 57.1 59.4 58.5 54.5
293 Salisbury, MD 49.2 48.9 45.8 47.1
294 Salt Lake City, UT 57.3 60.0 57.1 57.4
295 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 57.0 60.5 56.7 54.0
296 Sandusky, OH 48.6 46.4 43.1 42.2
297 San Angelo, TX 41.0 43.6 40.8 38.2
298 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 46.3 47.8 47.9 50.2
299 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 49.3 47.4 45.4 45.3
300 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 62.4 62.2 62.4 59.1
301 Savannah, GA 47.9 48.1 45.0 46.8
302 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 41.9 42.0 41.8 42.4
303 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 63.9 66.5 64.0 63.1
304 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 73.6 76.8 73.8 73.0
305 Sheboygan, WI 52.1 51.9 52.2 49.4
306 Sherman-Denison, TX 44.8 45.9 43.3 45.6
307 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 39.0 39.5 40.9 40.8
308 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 45.1 44.2 45.4 44.0
309 Sioux Falls, SD 50.3 56.9 50.5 52.0
310 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 43.5 43.7 43.6 42.0
311 Spartanburg, SC 40.9 45.2 39.7 41.9
312 Springfield, IL 48.0 53.5 52.7 50.4
313 Springfield, MA 49.0 51.6 49.2 49.2
314 Springfield, MO 41.5 45.3 39.7 40.1
315 Springfield, OH 42.7 45.5 42.4 39.6

IHS Global Insight 7


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

316 Spokane, WA 46.4 48.4 44.7 47.1


317 State College, PA 44.6 47.5 49.0 44.7
318 St. Cloud, MN 50.6 51.7 48.0 50.1
319 St. George, UT 46.8 50.3 46.5 49.1
320 St. Joseph, MO-KS 41.2 44.4 42.2 43.2
321 St. Louis, MO-IL 52.5 53.2 51.7 50.9
322 Stockton, CA 52.5 54.9 52.8 50.0
323 Sumter, SC 39.0 37.6 37.7 36.5
324 Syracuse, NY 48.6 49.0 49.6 49.7
325 Tallahassee, FL 46.9 44.1 40.0 41.5
326 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 46.6 46.3 44.1 43.5
327 Terre Haute, IN 39.3 41.1 38.3 41.2
328 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 40.5 38.5 40.7 40.5
329 Toledo, OH 46.4 44.5 43.3 41.6
330 Topeka, KS 46.4 49.3 48.2 45.3
331 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 70.3 73.8 71.6 71.0
332 Tucson, AZ 43.5 46.6 43.1 44.3
333 Tulsa, OK 45.7 47.1 46.4 44.5
334 Tuscaloosa, AL 39.0 40.4 40.0 41.0
335 Tyler, TX 44.6 47.2 46.5 43.2
336 Utica-Rome, NY 42.9 44.4 45.3 46.6
337 Valdosta, GA 39.5 42.1 38.6 36.0
338 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 66.9 70.6 65.8 63.4
339 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 46.1 46.4 42.7 47.4
340 Victoria, TX 45.5 45.8 47.8 45.8
341 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 47.9 50.8 48.9 51.6
342 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 54.8 57.1 55.2 57.3
343 Visalia-Porterville, CA 40.6 45.1 40.0 43.4
344 Waco, TX 40.5 39.7 38.8 39.1
345 Warner Robins, GA 53.3 58.6 49.9 58.5
346 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 83.2 85.8 85.2 84.5
347 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 43.1 48.3 44.5 45.8
348 Wausau, WI 53.4 54.7 49.7 49.4
349 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 38.7 38.1 37.9 35.7
350 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA 43.5 46.8 49.8 47.8
351 Wheeling, WV-OH 35.4 38.7 39.0 38.4
352 Wichita, KS 47.4 49.8 48.2 46.1
353 Wichita Falls, TX 41.4 45.4 43.7 39.6
354 Williamsport, PA 41.7 42.1 40.0 41.0
355 Wilmington, NC 44.8 48.1 44.0 44.8
356 Winchester, VA-WV 55.8 51.0 48.5 46.6
357 Winston-Salem, NC 45.0 46.0 45.7 42.6
358 Worcester, MA 62.0 66.9 63.4 61.2
359 Yakima, WA 42.7 45.2 41.3 40.7
360 York-Hanover, PA 55.1 56.9 57.0 56.4

IHS Global Insight 8


Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

361 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 40.3 40.5 40.9 39.2


362 Yuba City, CA 47.8 50.7 47.3 46.3
363 Yuma, AZ 40.7 38.9 38.7 42.3

IHS Global Insight 9


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

1 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8,333.5 8,470.6 1.7 137.2
2 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 4,273.8 4,332.2 1.4 58.5
3 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 5,162.5 5,220.0 1.1 57.5
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,940.3 2,996.5 1.9 56.1
5 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 2,614.6 2,657.6 1.7 43.0
6 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 2,701.3 2,740.6 1.5 39.3
7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 2,212.6 2,250.6 1.7 38.0
8 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1,713.8 1,750.9 2.2 37.0
9 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 2,246.5 2,282.5 1.6 36.0
10 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 2,983.1 3,016.9 1.1 33.8
11 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 1,896.3 1,922.2 1.4 25.9
12 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 2,442.8 2,468.6 1.1 25.8
13 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,672.6 1,698.2 1.5 25.6
14 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 1,720.8 1,746.4 1.5 25.6
15 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1,120.1 1,143.0 2.0 22.8
16 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 1,015.3 1,037.5 2.2 22.2
17 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 1,142.3 1,161.6 1.7 19.3
18 Denver-Aurora, CO 1,202.0 1,221.1 1.6 19.1
19 Columbus, OH 909.6 928.4 2.1 18.8
20 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 866.0 884.6 2.2 18.6
21 Austin-Round Rock, TX 784.2 802.7 2.4 18.5
22 Kansas City, MO-KS 965.5 983.0 1.8 17.5
23 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 1,756.1 1,773.0 1.0 16.9
24 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 1,243.0 1,259.8 1.4 16.9
25 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 979.2 995.9 1.7 16.7
26 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 1,001.1 1,017.7 1.7 16.6
27 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 808.1 824.4 2.0 16.3
28 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 749.8 764.0 1.9 14.2
29 San Antonio, TX 849.1 863.3 1.7 14.2
30 Baltimore-Towson, MD 1,279.6 1,293.1 1.1 13.6
31 Pittsburgh, PA 1,148.1 1,161.4 1.2 13.3
32 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 807.7 820.5 1.6 12.8
33 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 880.6 893.0 1.4 12.4
34 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 995.1 1,007.0 1.2 11.9
35 Salt Lake City, UT 621.9 633.8 1.9 11.8
36 Raleigh-Cary, NC 505.6 517.4 2.3 11.8
37 Jacksonville, FL 586.4 598.0 2.0 11.7
38 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 803.6 814.6 1.4 11.0
39 St. Louis, MO-IL 1,302.0 1,312.7 0.8 10.7
40 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 590.9 600.3 1.6 9.4
41 Rochester, NY 515.5 523.4 1.5 7.9

IHS Global Insight 10


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


42 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 607.5 615.1 1.3 7.6
43 Oklahoma City, OK 572.7 579.8 1.2 7.1
44 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 829.1 835.8 0.8 6.7
45 Columbia, SC 347.1 353.4 1.8 6.3
46 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 543.9 550.2 1.2 6.3
47 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 530.1 536.4 1.2 6.2
48 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 462.8 469.0 1.3 6.2
49 Tulsa, OK 417.2 423.3 1.5 6.1
50 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 672.2 678.1 0.9 5.9
51 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 226.3 232.1 2.6 5.8
52 Greensboro-High Point, NC 342.4 348.1 1.7 5.7
53 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 333.1 338.7 1.7 5.6
54 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 435.3 440.9 1.3 5.6
55 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 319.0 324.6 1.8 5.6
56 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 287.8 293.2 1.9 5.4
57 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 202.7 208.1 2.7 5.4
58 El Paso, TX 282.9 288.2 1.9 5.3
59 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 488.1 493.4 1.1 5.3
60 Toledo, OH 301.4 306.5 1.7 5.2
61 Bradenton-Sarasota-Venice, FL 239.7 244.8 2.2 5.2
62 Knoxville, TN 328.1 333.3 1.6 5.1
63 Madison, WI 349.0 354.2 1.5 5.1
64 Durham, NC 281.1 286.2 1.8 5.1
65 Albuquerque, NM 369.5 374.5 1.4 5.1
66 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 318.2 323.1 1.6 5.0
67 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 337.2 341.9 1.4 4.7
68 Richmond, VA 595.5 600.2 0.8 4.6
69 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 416.5 421.0 1.1 4.5
70 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 726.5 731.0 0.6 4.5
71 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 299.3 303.6 1.5 4.4
72 Provo-Orem, UT 184.1 188.4 2.4 4.4
73 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 198.2 202.4 2.1 4.2
74 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 199.9 204.0 2.1 4.2
75 Wichita, KS 285.1 289.3 1.5 4.2
76 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 275.4 279.5 1.5 4.1
77 Syracuse, NY 316.8 320.8 1.3 4.1
78 Huntsville, AL 207.1 211.1 2.0 4.1
79 Tucson, AZ 355.5 359.6 1.1 4.0
80 Lancaster, PA 226.3 230.2 1.8 4.0
81 Fresno, CA 278.3 282.2 1.4 3.9
82 Boise City-Nampa, ID 256.7 260.6 1.5 3.8
83 Colorado Springs, CO 245.8 249.5 1.5 3.7

IHS Global Insight 11


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


84 Winston-Salem, NC 208.9 212.6 1.8 3.7
85 Dayton, OH 371.3 375.0 1.0 3.7
86 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 373.1 376.8 1.0 3.7
87 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 248.5 252.1 1.5 3.7
88 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 119.0 122.5 3.0 3.6
89 Chattanooga, TN-GA 232.5 236.1 1.5 3.5
90 Lexington-Fayette, KY 250.1 253.6 1.4 3.4
91 Green Bay, WI 164.3 167.6 2.0 3.3
92 Springfield, MO 193.7 196.9 1.7 3.2
93 Jackson, MS 251.4 254.7 1.3 3.2
94 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 188.3 191.4 1.7 3.1
95 Worcester, MA 323.9 326.9 1.0 3.1
96 Honolulu, HI 443.8 446.8 0.7 3.1
97 Wilmington, NC 134.2 137.1 2.2 2.9
98 Bakersfield, CA 228.1 231.0 1.3 2.9
99 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 253.2 256.1 1.1 2.9
100 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 259.4 262.3 1.1 2.9
101 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 157.9 160.7 1.8 2.9
102 Spokane, WA 203.3 206.1 1.4 2.8
103 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 234.8 237.6 1.2 2.8
104 Naples-Marco Island, FL 108.9 111.7 2.6 2.8
105 Akron, OH 327.4 330.2 0.9 2.8
106 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 617.2 620.0 0.5 2.8
107 Anchorage, AK 172.6 175.4 1.6 2.8
108 Stockton, CA 188.9 191.7 1.5 2.8
109 Lakeland, FL 192.3 195.0 1.4 2.7
110 Mobile, AL 175.0 177.7 1.6 2.7
111 Port St. Lucie, FL 119.4 122.0 2.2 2.7
112 Evansville, IN-KY 175.5 178.1 1.5 2.6
113 Fort Wayne, IN 209.6 212.2 1.3 2.6
114 Reading, PA 169.7 172.2 1.5 2.5
115 Manchester-Nashua, NH 197.0 199.5 1.3 2.5
116 Lincoln, NE 175.8 178.2 1.4 2.4
117 Baton Rouge, LA 360.7 363.1 0.7 2.4
118 Fargo, ND-MN 124.0 126.4 2.0 2.4
119 Ann Arbor, MI 197.5 199.9 1.2 2.4
120 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 127.3 129.6 1.9 2.4
121 New Haven-Milford, CT 362.5 364.9 0.7 2.4
122 Asheville, NC 167.3 169.6 1.4 2.3
123 York-Hanover, PA 177.9 180.1 1.3 2.3
124 Sioux Falls, SD 134.1 136.3 1.7 2.3
125 Modesto, CA 146.7 148.9 1.5 2.2

IHS Global Insight 12


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


126 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 227.0 229.2 1.0 2.2
127 Appleton, WI 115.3 117.4 1.8 2.1
128 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 107.7 109.6 1.8 2.0
129 Laredo, TX 91.5 93.5 2.1 2.0
130 Montgomery, AL 164.8 166.7 1.2 1.9
131 Springfield, MA 286.9 288.8 0.7 1.9
132 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 136.2 138.1 1.4 1.9
133 Rockford, IL 144.6 146.4 1.3 1.9
134 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 103.6 105.4 1.8 1.8
135 Fort Smith, AR-OK 115.9 117.7 1.6 1.8
136 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 138.6 140.4 1.3 1.8
137 Ocala, FL 90.8 92.6 2.0 1.8
138 Spartanburg, SC 118.5 120.3 1.5 1.8
139 Savannah, GA 148.3 150.1 1.2 1.8
140 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 93.7 95.4 1.9 1.7
141 Salem, OR 140.4 142.1 1.2 1.7
142 Peoria, IL 185.8 187.4 0.9 1.7
143 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 133.7 135.3 1.3 1.7
144 Rochester, MN 104.3 105.9 1.6 1.7
145 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 140.9 142.6 1.2 1.7
146 Eugene-Springfield, OR 139.9 141.5 1.2 1.6
147 Erie, PA 128.5 130.1 1.3 1.6
148 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 209.0 210.6 0.8 1.6
149 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 157.5 159.1 1.0 1.6
150 Cedar Rapids, IA 138.3 139.8 1.1 1.5
151 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 133.9 135.4 1.2 1.5
152 Clarksville, TN-KY 83.6 85.1 1.8 1.5
153 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 114.3 115.8 1.3 1.5
154 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 128.6 130.1 1.2 1.5
155 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 118.1 119.5 1.3 1.5
156 Columbus, GA-AL 118.3 119.7 1.2 1.4
157 Eau Claire, WI 80.9 82.3 1.7 1.4
158 Tyler, TX 95.0 96.3 1.4 1.3
159 Lafayette, IN 93.9 95.2 1.4 1.3
160 Olympia, WA 97.6 98.9 1.4 1.3
161 St. George, UT 46.5 47.7 2.8 1.3
162 Canton-Massillon, OH 161.4 162.7 0.8 1.3
163 Boulder, CO 162.9 164.2 0.8 1.3
164 Medford, OR 76.1 77.4 1.7 1.3
165 Bellingham, WA 77.8 79.1 1.6 1.3
166 Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 97.2 98.5 1.3 1.3
167 Dover, DE 62.9 64.2 2.0 1.3

IHS Global Insight 13


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


168 St. Cloud, MN 98.1 99.3 1.3 1.3
169 Billings, MT 79.6 80.8 1.6 1.2
170 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 107.2 108.4 1.2 1.2
171 Joplin, MO 78.9 80.1 1.6 1.2
172 Bloomington-Normal, IL 90.0 91.2 1.4 1.2
173 Wausau, WI 66.9 68.1 1.8 1.2
174 La Crosse, WI-MN 74.4 75.5 1.6 1.2
175 Utica-Rome, NY 131.4 132.6 0.9 1.2
176 Bismarck, ND 64.2 65.3 1.8 1.2
177 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 89.9 91.0 1.3 1.2
178 Tuscaloosa, AL 92.9 94.0 1.3 1.2
179 Racine, WI 73.8 75.0 1.6 1.2
180 Amarillo, TX 112.3 113.5 1.0 1.2
181 Gainesville, GA 71.3 72.4 1.6 1.1
182 Iowa City, IA 88.5 89.6 1.3 1.1
183 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 119.5 120.6 0.9 1.1
184 Las Cruces, NM 68.8 69.9 1.6 1.1
185 Greeley, CO 78.3 79.4 1.4 1.1
186 Waco, TX 107.6 108.6 1.0 1.1
187 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 182.8 183.9 0.6 1.1
188 Charleston, WV 151.3 152.4 0.7 1.1
189 Coeur d'Alene, ID 52.5 53.6 2.0 1.1
190 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 95.2 96.3 1.1 1.1
191 Dalton, GA 63.6 64.7 1.7 1.1
192 Greenville, NC 75.0 76.0 1.4 1.1
193 Roanoke, VA 155.8 156.8 0.7 1.0
194 Logan, UT-ID 55.3 56.3 1.9 1.0
195 Columbia, MO 93.3 94.3 1.1 1.0
196 Gainesville, FL 125.8 126.8 0.8 1.0
197 Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL 80.0 81.0 1.3 1.0
198 Missoula, MT 51.4 52.4 2.0 1.0
199 Bend, OR 60.9 61.9 1.7 1.0
200 Bloomington, IN 80.5 81.5 1.2 1.0
201 Florence, SC 82.6 83.5 1.2 1.0
202 Idaho Falls, ID 48.4 49.3 2.0 1.0
203 Janesville, WI 60.8 61.7 1.6 1.0
204 Ithaca, NY 64.4 65.3 1.5 1.0
205 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 117.5 118.5 0.8 1.0
206 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 169.7 170.6 0.6 0.9
207 Lynchburg, VA 106.0 106.9 0.9 0.9
208 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 96.6 97.5 1.0 0.9
209 Corpus Christi, TX 185.2 186.1 0.5 0.9

IHS Global Insight 14


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


210 Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 72.0 72.9 1.3 0.9
211 Visalia-Porterville, CA 107.3 108.2 0.9 0.9
212 Jackson, TN 57.4 58.3 1.6 0.9
213 Rapid City, SD 60.8 61.7 1.5 0.9
214 Decatur, AL 53.5 54.4 1.7 0.9
215 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 45.7 46.6 2.0 0.9
216 Prescott, AZ 52.5 53.4 1.7 0.9
217 Tallahassee, FL 168.0 168.9 0.5 0.9
218 Punta Gorda, FL 41.0 41.8 2.2 0.9
219 Auburn-Opelika, AL 54.2 55.0 1.7 0.9
220 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 220.7 221.6 0.4 0.9
221 Bowling Green, KY 59.0 59.8 1.5 0.9
222 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 58.4 59.2 1.5 0.9
223 Jonesboro, AR 48.2 49.1 1.8 0.9
224 Charlottesville, VA 101.4 102.2 0.9 0.9
225 Athens-Clarke County, GA 80.5 81.4 1.1 0.9
226 Dothan, AL 56.2 57.0 1.5 0.8
227 Topeka, KS 106.8 107.6 0.8 0.8
228 Burlington, NC 55.6 56.4 1.5 0.8
229 Yakima, WA 74.0 74.8 1.1 0.8
230 Hattiesburg, MS 59.4 60.2 1.4 0.8
231 Anderson, SC 60.7 61.5 1.3 0.8
232 Flagstaff, AZ 62.3 63.1 1.3 0.8
233 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 43.1 43.8 1.9 0.8
234 Fayetteville, NC 130.1 130.9 0.6 0.8
235 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 85.8 86.5 0.9 0.8
236 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 80.5 81.2 1.0 0.8
237 Morristown, TN 44.6 45.4 1.7 0.8
238 Morgantown, WV 65.8 66.5 1.1 0.7
239 Sheboygan, WI 58.9 59.6 1.3 0.7
240 Battle Creek, MI 55.2 55.9 1.4 0.7
241 State College, PA 74.8 75.5 1.0 0.7
242 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 60.7 61.4 1.2 0.7
243 Santa Fe, NM 61.0 61.7 1.2 0.7
244 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 69.9 70.6 1.0 0.7
245 Binghamton, NY 109.6 110.3 0.7 0.7
246 Fond du Lac, WI 45.2 45.9 1.6 0.7
247 Lubbock, TX 132.8 133.4 0.5 0.7
248 Cleveland, TN 38.6 39.2 1.8 0.7
249 Jackson, MI 54.0 54.6 1.3 0.7
250 Lafayette, LA 153.1 153.7 0.5 0.7
251 Altoona, PA 60.4 61.0 1.1 0.7

IHS Global Insight 15


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


252 Grand Junction, CO 58.6 59.3 1.2 0.7
253 Hot Springs, AR 39.7 40.4 1.7 0.7
254 Dubuque, IA 56.8 57.4 1.2 0.7
255 Owensboro, KY 50.5 51.2 1.3 0.7
256 Grand Forks, ND-MN 55.4 56.1 1.2 0.7
257 Johnson City, TN 77.2 77.8 0.8 0.6
258 Columbus, IN 43.6 44.2 1.5 0.6
259 Lebanon, PA 50.9 51.5 1.3 0.6
260 Barnstable Town, MA 89.1 89.7 0.7 0.6
261 Kingston, NY 60.2 60.8 1.1 0.6
262 Winchester, VA-WV 56.6 57.2 1.1 0.6
263 College Station-Bryan, TX 97.3 97.9 0.6 0.6
264 Pocatello, ID 35.7 36.3 1.7 0.6
265 Napa, CA 59.8 60.4 1.0 0.6
266 Yuma, AZ 48.4 49.0 1.3 0.6
267 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 55.9 56.5 1.1 0.6
268 Lawrence, KS 51.7 52.2 1.2 0.6
269 Bangor, ME 72.5 73.1 0.8 0.6
270 Glens Falls, NY 54.3 54.8 1.1 0.6
271 St. Joseph, MO-KS 55.3 55.8 1.0 0.6
272 Longview, TX 97.9 98.4 0.6 0.6
273 Flint, MI 131.1 131.7 0.4 0.6
274 Monroe, MI 37.4 37.9 1.5 0.5
275 Terre Haute, IN 70.2 70.7 0.8 0.5
276 Reno-Sparks, NV 187.1 187.6 0.3 0.5
277 Johnstown, PA 61.1 61.6 0.9 0.5
278 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 41.7 42.2 1.3 0.5
279 Lima, OH 52.9 53.4 1.0 0.5
280 Wheeling, WV-OH 68.4 68.9 0.8 0.5
281 Fairbanks, AK 39.5 40.0 1.3 0.5
282 Gadsden, AL 34.9 35.4 1.5 0.5
283 Salisbury, MD 52.3 52.8 1.0 0.5
284 Merced, CA 56.9 57.4 0.9 0.5
285 Williamsport, PA 52.2 52.7 1.0 0.5
286 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 96.4 96.9 0.5 0.5
287 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 50.3 50.8 1.0 0.5
288 Jefferson City, MO 78.0 78.4 0.6 0.5
289 Anderson, IN 39.1 39.5 1.3 0.5
290 Monroe, LA 75.9 76.4 0.7 0.5
291 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 44.6 45.1 1.1 0.5
292 Rocky Mount, NC 59.3 59.7 0.8 0.5
293 Pueblo, CO 59.4 59.8 0.8 0.5

IHS Global Insight 16


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


294 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 45.3 45.7 1.1 0.5
295 Palm Coast, FL 18.2 18.7 2.5 0.5
296 Springfield, OH 49.7 50.1 0.9 0.5
297 Ocean City, NJ 41.3 41.7 1.1 0.4
298 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 74.4 74.8 0.6 0.4
299 Bay City, MI 37.7 38.1 1.2 0.4
300 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 45.2 45.6 1.0 0.4
301 Elizabethtown, KY 46.6 47.0 0.9 0.4
302 Macon, GA 96.3 96.7 0.5 0.4
303 Sherman-Denison, TX 42.8 43.2 1.0 0.4
304 Salinas, CA 121.6 122.0 0.4 0.4
305 Cheyenne, WY 44.2 44.6 1.0 0.4
306 Anniston-Oxford, AL 48.4 48.8 0.9 0.4
307 Kokomo, IN 41.1 41.5 1.0 0.4
308 Norwich-New London, CT 127.2 127.6 0.3 0.4
309 Sandusky, OH 39.2 39.6 1.1 0.4
310 Wenatchee, WA 39.6 40.0 1.0 0.4
311 Chico, CA 70.5 70.9 0.6 0.4
312 Lake Charles, LA 91.6 91.9 0.4 0.4
313 Texarkana-Texarkana, TX-AR 56.9 57.3 0.7 0.4
314 Lewiston, ID-WA 25.1 25.5 1.5 0.4
315 Sumter, SC 36.8 37.1 1.0 0.4
316 Harrisonburg, VA 62.9 63.2 0.6 0.4
317 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 89.9 90.3 0.4 0.4
318 Redding, CA 59.9 60.3 0.6 0.4
319 Springfield, IL 111.9 112.3 0.3 0.4
320 Elmira, NY 39.8 40.2 0.9 0.4
321 Warner Robins, GA 59.3 59.7 0.6 0.4
322 Valdosta, GA 51.3 51.6 0.7 0.4
323 Corvallis, OR 38.3 38.6 0.9 0.3
324 Mansfield, OH 52.0 52.3 0.6 0.3
325 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 181.3 181.6 0.2 0.3
326 Farmington, NM 49.3 49.6 0.7 0.3
327 Rome, GA 37.7 38.0 0.8 0.3
328 Casper, WY 40.4 40.7 0.8 0.3
329 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 160.7 161.0 0.2 0.3
330 Duluth, MN-WI 129.0 129.3 0.2 0.3
331 Great Falls, MT 35.5 35.8 0.9 0.3
332 Muncie, IN 48.7 49.0 0.6 0.3
333 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 57.8 58.1 0.5 0.3
334 Longview, WA 35.0 35.2 0.8 0.3
335 Cumberland, MD-WV 41.1 41.4 0.7 0.3

IHS Global Insight 17


Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas
(Thousands)

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference


336 Pascagoula, MS 57.5 57.7 0.4 0.2
337 Pittsfield, MA 64.9 65.1 0.4 0.2
338 Goldsboro, NC 41.8 42.0 0.6 0.2
339 Brunswick, GA 40.2 40.4 0.6 0.2
340 Alexandria, LA 65.0 65.2 0.4 0.2
341 Decatur, IL 52.8 53.0 0.4 0.2
342 Ames, IA 46.5 46.7 0.5 0.2
343 El Centro, CA 44.7 44.9 0.5 0.2
344 Yuba City, CA 37.2 37.4 0.5 0.2
345 Danville, VA 39.8 40.0 0.5 0.2
346 Abilene, TX 61.8 61.9 0.3 0.2
347 Jacksonville, NC 47.2 47.4 0.4 0.2
348 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 68.8 68.9 0.2 0.2
349 Danville, IL 28.6 28.7 0.6 0.2
350 Albany, GA 61.4 61.6 0.3 0.2
351 Victoria, TX 51.5 51.6 0.3 0.1
352 Madera, CA 31.9 32.0 0.4 0.1
353 San Angelo, TX 45.5 45.6 0.3 0.1
354 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria, CA 160.4 160.5 0.1 0.1
355 Champaign-Urbana, IL 105.3 105.4 0.1 0.1
356 Lawton, OK 43.1 43.2 0.3 0.1
357 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 36.5 36.6 0.3 0.1
358 Wichita Falls, TX 57.4 57.5 0.1 0.1
359 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 19.3 19.4 0.4 0.1
360 Pine Bluff, AR 36.4 36.4 0.1 0.0
361 Odessa, TX 63.8 63.7 -0.1 0.0
362 Midland, TX 71.0 70.8 -0.2 -0.1
363 Carson City, NV 28.5 28.2 -1.1 -0.3

IHS Global Insight 18


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Alaska
Anchorage, AK 174.2 52.2
Fairbanks, AK 39.8 11.9
Sum of Metro Areas 214.0 64.1
Alabama
Anniston-Oxford, AL 48.6 2.6
Auburn-Opelika, AL 54.7 2.9
Birmingham-Hoover, AL 491.2 25.9
Columbus, GA-AL 13.0 0.7
Decatur, AL 54.0 2.8
Dothan, AL 56.7 3.0
Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 56.2 3.0
Gadsden, AL 35.2 1.9
Huntsville, AL 209.5 11.1
Mobile, AL 176.7 9.3
Montgomery, AL 166.0 8.8
Tuscaloosa, AL 93.5 4.9
Sum of Metro Areas 1,455.3 76.8
Arkansas
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR 199.0 16.8
Fort Smith, AR-OK 94.8 8.0
Hot Springs, AR 40.1 3.4
Jonesboro, AR 48.7 4.1
Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR 340.0 28.7
Memphis, TN-MS-AR 16.4 1.4
Pine Bluff, AR 36.4 3.1
Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 13.7 1.2
Sum of Metro Areas 789.1 66.7
Arizona
Flagstaff, AZ 62.7 2.6
Lake Havasu, AZ 46.2 1.9
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1,734.7 71.2
Prescott, AZ 53.0 2.2
Tucson, AZ 357.6 14.7
Yuma, AZ 48.7 2.0
Sum of Metro Areas 2,302.8 94.5
California
Bakersfield, CA 229.6 1.6
Chico, CA 70.7 0.5
El Centro, CA 44.7 0.3
Fresno, CA 280.5 2.0
Hanford-Corcoran, CA 36.5 0.3
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 5,194.9 36.6
Madera, CA 32.0 0.2
Merced, CA 57.1 0.4
Modesto, CA 148.0 1.0

IHS Global Insight 19


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Napa, CA 60.1 0.4
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 277.8 2.0
Redding, CA 60.1 0.4
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1,133.3 8.0
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria, CA 160.4 1.1
Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 809.6 5.7
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 90.1 0.6
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 1,252.6 8.8
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 888.1 6.2
Salinas, CA 121.8 0.9
San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 97.1 0.7
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 170.1 1.2
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 1,911.5 13.5
Stockton, CA 190.5 1.3
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 118.0 0.8
Visalia-Porterville, CA 107.7 0.8
Yuba City, CA 37.3 0.3
Sum of Metro Areas 13,580.0 95.6
Colorado
Boulder, CO 163.7 7.2
Colorado Springs, CO 248.1 10.9
Denver-Aurora, CO 1,213.6 53.3
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 137.3 6.0
Greeley, CO 79.0 3.5
Grand Junction, CO 59.0 2.6
Pueblo, CO 59.6 2.6
Sum of Metro Areas 1,960.2 86.0
Connecticut
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 419.2 25.7
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 618.5 37.9
New Haven-Milford, CT 363.8 22.3
Norwich-New London, CT 127.4 7.8
Sum of Metro Areas 1,528.9 93.7
District of Columbia
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 715.9 100.0
Sum of Metro Areas
Delaware
Dover, DE 63.7 15.3
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 275.3 66.1
Sum of Metro Areas 339.0 81.4
Florida
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 200.6 2.7
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 159.5 2.2
Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL 80.6 1.1
Gainesville, FL 126.3 1.7
Jacksonville, FL 593.3 8.1

IHS Global Insight 20


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Lakeland, FL 193.8 2.6
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL 2,235.5 30.4
Naples-Marco Island, FL 110.6 1.5
Ocala, FL 91.8 1.2
Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 1,028.8 14.0
Palm Coast, FL 18.5 0.3
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 190.0 2.6
Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 72.5 1.0
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 158.4 2.2
Port St. Lucie-Fort Pierce, FL 120.9 1.6
Punta Gorda, FL 41.5 0.6
Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL 242.8 3.3
Tallahassee, FL 168.4 2.3
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 1,153.8 15.7
Vero Beach, FL 43.6 0.6
Sum of Metro Areas 7,031.0 95.6
Georgia
Albany, GA 61.4 1.6
Athens-Clarke County, GA 80.9 2.1
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 2,267.0 59.1
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 144.8 3.8
Brunswick, GA 40.3 1.1
Chattanooga, TN-GA 30.7 0.8
Columbus, GA-AL 106.0 2.8
Dalton, GA 64.3 1.7
Gainesville, GA 72.0 1.9
Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 19.3 0.5
Macon, GA 96.4 2.5
Rome, GA 37.8 1.0
Savannah, GA 149.2 3.9
Valdosta, GA 51.4 1.3
Warner Robins, GA 59.5 1.5
Sum of Metro Areas 3,280.9 85.5
Hawaii
Honolulu, HI 445.5 74.5
Sum of Metro Areas
Iowa
Ames, IA 46.6 3.1
Cedar Rapids, IA 139.2 9.3
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 89.9 6.0
Des Moines, IA 322.5 21.5
Dubuque, IA 57.2 3.8
Iowa City, IA 89.1 5.9
Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 49.2 3.3
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 51.9 3.5
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 90.6 6.0

IHS Global Insight 21


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Sum of Metro Areas 936.1 62.4
Idaho
Boise City-Nampa, ID 258.9 42.1
Coeur d'Alene, ID 53.1 8.6
Idaho Falls, ID 48.9 8.0
Lewiston, ID-WA 19.8 3.2
Logan, UT-ID 3.3 0.5
Pocatello, ID 36.0 5.9
Sum of Metro Areas 420.0 68.3
Illinois
Bloomington-Normal, IL 90.7 1.6
Champaign-Urbana, IL 105.2 1.8
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI (MSA) 4,044.0 70.9
Danville, IL 28.6 0.5
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 93.5 1.6
Decatur, IL 52.9 0.9
Kankakee-Bradley, IL 45.4 0.8
Peoria, IL 186.7 3.3
Rockford, IL 145.7 2.6
Springfield, IL 112.0 2.0
St. Louis, MO-IL 241.9 4.2
Sum of Metro Areas 5,146.7 90.2
Indiana
Anderson, IN 39.3 1.4
Bloomington, IN 81.0 2.9
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI (MSA) 262.7 9.3
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 21.0 0.7
Columbus, IN 44.0 1.6
Elkhart-Goshen, IN 104.7 3.7
Evansville, IN-KY 153.8 5.5
Fort Wayne, IN 211.2 7.5
Indianapolis, IN 877.1 31.1
Kokomo, IN 41.3 1.5
Lafayette, IN 94.7 3.4
Louisville, KY-IN 96.9 3.4
Michigan City-La Porte, IN 42.0 1.5
Muncie, IN 48.8 1.7
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 125.7 4.5
Terre Haute, IN 70.5 2.5
Sum of Metro Areas 2,314.5 82.1
Kansas
Kansas City, MO-KS 435.5 32.5
Lawrence, KS 52.0 3.9
St. Joseph, MO-KS 2.4 0.2
Topeka, KS 107.3 8.0
Wichita, KS 287.6 21.4

IHS Global Insight 22


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Sum of Metro Areas 884.8 66.0
Kentucky
Bowling Green, KY 59.5 3.3
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 184.3 10.2
Clarksville, TN-KY 35.4 2.0
Elizabethtown, KY 46.8 2.6
Evansville, IN-KY 23.2 1.3
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 37.3 2.1
Lexington-Fayette, KY 252.2 13.9
Louisville, KY-IN 515.3 28.4
Owensboro, KY 50.8 2.8
Sum of Metro Areas 1,204.8 66.5
Louisiana
Alexandria, LA 65.0 3.4
Baton Rouge, LA 361.8 18.8
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 96.6 5.0
Lake Charles, LA 91.7 4.8
Lafayette, LA 153.3 8.0
Monroe, LA 76.2 4.0
New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 533.6 27.7
Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 181.3 9.4
Sum of Metro Areas 1,559.5 80.9
Massachusetts
Barnstable Town, MA 89.4 2.7
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH (MSA) 2,263.6 69.5
Pittsfield, MA 65.0 2.0
Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 211.7 6.5
Springfield, MA 287.8 8.8
Worcester, MA 325.6 10.0
Sum of Metro Areas 3,243.1 99.6
Maryland
Baltimore-Towson, MD 1,287.4 50.6
Cumberland, MD-WV 32.6 1.3
Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 64.3 2.5
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 28.9 1.1
Salisbury, MD 52.5 2.1
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 941.7 37.1
Sum of Metro Areas 2,407.5 94.7
Maine
Bangor, ME 72.8 12.1
Lewiston-Auburn, ME 50.6 8.4
Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 261.1 43.5
Sum of Metro Areas 384.5 64.1
Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI 198.7 5.0
Battle Creek, MI 55.6 1.4

IHS Global Insight 23


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Bay City, MI 37.9 1.0
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 1,765.4 44.5
Flint, MI 131.3 3.3
Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 375.3 9.5
Holland-Grand Haven, MI 108.9 2.7
Jackson, MI 54.3 1.4
Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 139.5 3.5
Lansing-East Lansing, MI 221.0 5.6
Monroe, MI 37.7 1.0
Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 58.9 1.5
Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 61.1 1.5
Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 86.2 2.2
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 8.9 0.2
Sum of Metro Areas 3,340.8 84.3
Minnesota
Duluth, MN-WI 112.6 4.1
Fargo, ND-MN 18.7 0.7
Grand Forks, ND-MN 13.0 0.5
La Crosse, WI-MN 5.3 0.2
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 1,696.4 62.5
Rochester, MN 105.2 3.9
St. Cloud, MN 98.8 3.6
Sum of Metro Areas 2,050.0 75.6
Missouri
Columbia, MO 93.8 3.5
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 7.0 0.3
Jefferson City, MO 78.2 2.9
Joplin, MO 79.6 3.0
Kansas City, MO-KS 540.9 20.2
Springfield, MO 195.6 7.3
St. Joseph, MO-KS 53.2 2.0
St. Louis, MO-IL 1,066.2 39.9
Sum of Metro Areas 2,114.5 79.1
Mississippi
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 107.9 9.8
Hattiesburg, MS 59.9 5.4
Jackson, MS 253.3 22.9
Memphis, TN-MS-AR 71.4 6.5
Pascagoula, MS 57.7 5.2
Sum of Metro Areas 550.0 49.8
Montana
Billings, MT 80.3 18.3
Great Falls, MT 35.7 8.1
Missoula, MT 52.0 11.8
Sum of Metro Areas 167.9 38.3
North Carolina

IHS Global Insight 24


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Asheville, NC 168.6 4.3
Burlington, NC 56.0 1.4
Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 742.2 18.9
Durham, NC 284.1 7.2
Fayetteville, NC 130.5 3.3
Goldsboro, NC 41.9 1.1
Greensboro-High Point, NC 345.7 8.8
Greenville, NC 75.6 1.9
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 141.9 3.6
Jacksonville, NC 47.3 1.2
Raleigh-Cary, NC 512.7 13.1
Rocky Mount, NC 59.5 1.5
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 5.8 0.1
Wilmington, NC 136.0 3.5
Winston-Salem, NC 211.1 5.4
Sum of Metro Areas 2,958.9 75.5
North Dakota
Bismarck, ND 64.9 16.1
Fargo, ND-MN 106.8 26.6
Grand Forks, ND-MN 42.8 10.6
Sum of Metro Areas 214.4 53.3
Nebraska
Lincoln, NE 177.0 18.3
Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 417.5 43.2
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 14.0 1.5
Sum of Metro Areas 608.6 62.9
New Hampshire
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH (MSA) 193.9 30.5
Manchester-Nashua, NH 198.5 31.2
Sum of Metro Areas 392.3 61.8
New Jersey
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 35.8 0.9
Atlantic City, NJ 134.8 3.4
New York-Nrthrn NewJersey-Lng Islnd, NY-NJ-PA (MSA) 2,815.1 72.0
Ocean City, NJ 41.5 1.1
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 535.0 13.7
Trenton-Ewing, NJ 236.4 6.0
Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 58.0 1.5
Sum of Metro Areas 3,856.6 98.7
New Mexico
Albuquerque, NM 372.3 45.9
Farmington, NM 49.4 6.1
Las Cruces, NM 69.4 8.6
Santa Fe, NM 61.4 7.6
Sum of Metro Areas 552.5 68.1
Nevada

IHS Global Insight 25


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Carson City, NV 28.3 2.5
Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 815.3 72.2
Reno-Sparks, NV 187.3 16.6
Sum of Metro Areas 1,030.8 91.3
New York
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 438.2 5.0
Binghamton, NY 109.9 1.3
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 547.1 6.3
Elmira, NY 40.0 0.5
Glens Falls, NY 54.6 0.6
Ithaca, NY 64.9 0.7
Kingston, NY 60.5 0.7
New York-Nrthrn New Jersey-Lng Islnd, NY-NJ-PA (MSA) 5,584.7 63.9
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 250.5 2.9
Rochester, NY 519.9 5.9
Syracuse, NY 318.9 3.6
Utica-Rome, NY 132.0 1.5
Sum of Metro Areas 8,121.2 92.9
Ohio
Akron, OH 329.2 6.4
Canton-Massillon, OH 162.2 3.1
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 806.4 15.6
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 1,002.5 19.4
Columbus, OH 921.1 17.8
Dayton, OH 373.7 7.2
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 13.4 0.3
Lima, OH 53.2 1.0
Mansfield, OH 52.2 1.0
Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 25.5 0.5
Sandusky, OH 39.4 0.8
Springfield, OH 49.9 1.0
Toledo, OH 304.4 5.9
Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 24.7 0.5
Wheeling, WV-OH 24.7 0.5
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 177.9 3.4
Sum of Metro Areas 4,360.6 84.5
Oklahoma
Fort Smith, AR-OK 22.3 1.4
Lawton, OK 43.1 2.7
Oklahoma City, OK 576.9 36.5
Tulsa, OK 420.9 26.6
Sum of Metro Areas 1,063.3 67.3
Oregon
Bend, OR 61.5 3.7
Corvallis, OR 38.4 2.3
Eugene-Springfield, OR 140.8 8.6

IHS Global Insight 26


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Medford, OR 76.9 4.7
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 859.1 52.3
Salem, OR 141.3 8.6
Sum of Metro Areas 1,317.9 80.3
Pennsylvania
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 300.8 5.2
Altoona, PA 60.8 1.1
Erie, PA 129.6 2.3
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 321.2 5.6
Johnstown, PA 61.5 1.1
Lancaster, PA 228.8 4.0
Lebanon, PA 51.3 0.9
NewYork-Nrthrn New Jersey-Lng Islnd, NY-NJ-PA (MSA) 11.0 0.2
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 1,886.1 32.8
Pittsburgh, PA 1,156.4 20.1
Reading, PA 171.4 3.0
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 255.0 4.4
State College, PA 75.2 1.3
Williamsport, PA 52.5 0.9
York-Hanover, PA 179.3 3.1
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 50.5 0.9
Sum of Metro Areas 4,991.2 86.9
Rhode Island
Providence-New Bedford-FallRiver, RI-MA 463.7 100.0
Sum of Metro Areas
South Carolina
Anderson, SC 61.1 3.3
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 64.9 3.5
Charleston-North Charleston, SC 291.0 15.8
Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 75.4 4.1
Columbia, SC 350.7 19.0
Florence, SC 83.1 4.5
Greenville, SC 301.8 16.4
Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 121.1 6.6
Spartanburg, SC 119.6 6.5
Sumter, SC 37.0 2.0
Sum of Metro Areas 1,505.6 81.6
South Dakota
Rapid City, SD 61.4 14.9
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 8.6 2.1
Sioux Falls, SD 135.4 33.0
Sum of Metro Areas 205.4 50.0
Tennessee
Chattanooga, TN-GA 203.8 7.6
Clarksville, TN-KY 49.2 1.8
Cleveland, TN 39.0 1.5

IHS Global Insight 27


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Jackson, TN 57.9 2.2
Johnson City, TN 77.5 2.9
Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 80.9 3.0
Knoxville, TN 331.1 12.4
Memphis, TN-MS-AR 508.5 19.0
Morristown, TN 45.0 1.7
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN 758.5 28.3
Sum of Metro Areas 2,151.5 80.4
Texas
Abilene, TX 61.8 0.6
Amarillo, TX 112.9 1.1
Austin-Round Rock, TX 795.0 7.4
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 160.7 1.5
Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 128.6 1.2
College Station-Bryan, TX 97.6 0.9
Corpus Christi, TX 185.5 1.7
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,972.6 27.7
El Paso, TX 285.9 2.7
Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 2,638.2 24.6
Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 129.4 1.2
Laredo, TX 92.6 0.9
Longview, TX 98.1 0.9
Lubbock, TX 133.0 1.2
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 229.6 2.1
Midland, TX 70.8 0.7
Odessa, TX 63.6 0.6
San Angelo, TX 45.5 0.4
San Antonio, TX 857.2 8.0
Sherman-Denison, TX 43.0 0.4
Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 43.4 0.4
Tyler, TX 95.7 0.9
Victoria, TX 51.5 0.5
Waco, TX 108.1 1.0
Wichita Falls, TX 57.4 0.5
Sum of Metro Areas 9,557.7 89.2
Utah
Logan, UT-ID 52.6 4.3
Ogden-Clearfield, UT 202.3 16.3
Provo-Orem, UT 186.6 15.1
Salt Lake City, UT 629.0 50.8
St. George, UT 47.2 3.8
Sum of Metro Areas 1,117.8 90.3
Virginia
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 68.8 1.9
Charlottesville, VA 101.8 2.8
Danville, VA 39.9 1.1

IHS Global Insight 28


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Harrisonburg, VA 63.0 1.7
Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 38.0 1.0
Lynchburg, VA 106.4 2.9
Richmond, VA 598.0 16.3
Roanoke, VA 156.2 4.3
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 723.2 19.7
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 1,330.2 36.2
Winchester, VA-WV 52.8 1.4
Sum of Metro Areas 3,278.1 89.3
Vermont
Burlington-South Burlington, VT 120.1 39.4
Sum of Metro Areas
Washington
Bellingham, WA 78.5 2.8
Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 80.9 2.8
Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 97.9 3.4
Lewiston, ID-WA 5.5 0.2
Longview, WA 35.1 1.2
Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 44.9 1.6
Olympia, WA 98.4 3.5
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 130.4 4.6
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,687.7 59.3
Spokane, WA 204.9 7.2
Wenatchee, WA 39.8 1.4
Yakima, WA 74.5 2.6
Sum of Metro Areas 2,578.4 90.6
Wisconsin
Appleton, WI 116.6 4.2
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI (MSA) 56.8 2.0
Duluth, MN-WI 112.6 4.1
Eau Claire, WI 81.7 2.9
Fond du Lac, WI 45.6 1.6
Green Bay, WI 166.2 6.0
Janesville, WI 61.3 2.2
La Crosse, WI-MN 69.8 2.5
Madison, WI 352.0 12.6
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 832.8 29.8
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 40.3 1.4
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 94.8 3.4
Racine, WI 74.5 2.7
Sheboygan, WI 59.4 2.1
Wausau, WI 67.6 2.4
Sum of Metro Areas 2,232.0 80.0
West Virginia
Charleston, WV 151.9 20.0
Cumberland, MD-WV 8.6 1.1

IHS Global Insight 29


Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Employment % of State
Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 31.5 4.1
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 64.3 8.5
Morgantown, WV 66.2 8.7
Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 44.8 5.9
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 14.8 2.0
Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 20.9 2.7
Wheeling, WV-OH 43.9 5.8
Winchester, VA-WV 4.1 0.5
Sum of Metro Areas 451.1 59.5
Wyoming
Casper, WY 40.5 13.8
Cheyenne, WY 44.4 15.2
Sum of Metro Areas 85.0 29.0

IHS Global Insight 30


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 219.7 217.1 232.1 100+%
Bismarck, ND 61.8 61.1 65.3 100+%
Anchorage, AK 171.6 170.3 175.4 100+%
Fargo, ND-MN 122.1 120.4 126.4 100+%
Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 126.9 125.2 130.1 100+%
Fairbanks, AK 38.6 37.8 40.0 100+%
Cumberland, MD-WV 40.0 39.1 41.4 100+%
Morgantown, WV 64.4 63.0 66.5 100+%
Grand Forks, ND-MN 54.1 52.7 56.1 100+%
Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 126.5 124.1 129.6 100+%
El Paso, TX 279.5 272.8 288.2 100+%
Austin-Round Rock, TX 777.3 755.7 802.7 100+%
Ithaca, NY 64.5 63.9 65.3 100+%
Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 96.4 94.4 98.5 100+%
Burlington-South Burlington, VT 117.1 113.7 120.6 100+%
New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 526.9 517.2 536.4 100+%
College Station-Bryan, TX 96.9 95.7 97.9 100+%
Lincoln, NE 174.8 170.4 178.2 100+%
Lebanon, PA 50.3 48.8 51.5 100+%
Dubuque, IA 56.0 54.0 57.4 100+%
Lubbock, TX 131.3 128.3 133.4 100+%
Columbia, MO 92.9 90.6 94.3 100+%
Laredo, TX 90.9 86.3 93.5 100+%
Waco, TX 107.3 104.9 108.6 100+%
Hot Springs, AR 39.3 37.1 40.4 100+%
Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 2,606.6 2,499.9 2,657.6 100+%
Corpus Christi, TX 183.0 176.3 186.1 100+%
Pueblo, CO 59.0 57.1 59.8 100+%
Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 94.2 91.1 95.4 100+%
San Antonio, TX 854.4 832.4 863.3 100+%
Madison, WI 350.1 339.8 354.2 100+%
Kankakee-Bradley, IL 44.9 42.5 45.6 100+%
Rochester, NY 517.9 499.7 523.4 100+%
Pittsburgh, PA 1,151.1 1,113.6 1,161.4 100+%
Warner Robins, GA 59.4 58.4 59.7 100+%
Sandusky, OH 38.8 35.5 39.6 100+%
Wheeling, WV-OH 68.5 66.6 68.9 100+%
Pittsfield, MA 64.5 61.2 65.1 100+%
Lafayette, LA 152.6 145.5 153.7 100+%
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 90.6 87.5 91.0 100+%
Oklahoma City, OK 576.7 552.0 579.8 100+%
State College, PA 75.3 73.4 75.5 100+%
Fayetteville, NC 130.5 127.5 130.9 100+%
San Angelo, TX 45.4 43.7 45.6 100+%

IHS Global Insight 31


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 3,009.4 2,933.2 3,016.9 100+%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,983.9 2,835.0 2,996.5 100+%
Las Cruces, NM 69.8 68.3 69.9 100+%
Tyler, TX 96.1 91.5 96.3 100+%
Ogden-Clearfield, UT 203.4 191.1 204.0 100+%
Amarillo, TX 113.3 109.1 113.5 100+%
Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 181.4 175.0 181.6 100+%
Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 138.0 132.4 138.1 100+%
Sioux Falls, SD 136.4 132.4 136.3 97.6%
Lawrence, KS 52.3 49.4 52.2 97.1%
Charlottesville, VA 102.4 98.2 102.2 95.5%
Victoria, TX 51.8 48.4 51.6 95.5%
Evansville, IN-KY 178.6 169.0 178.1 95.4%
Longview, TX 98.8 92.6 98.4 94.2%
Logan, UT-ID 56.6 51.8 56.3 94.2%
Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 208.7 198.1 208.1 93.9%
Great Falls, MT 35.8 35.4 35.8 93.1%
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN 767.7 718.9 764.0 92.4%
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 2,476.7 2,373.7 2,468.6 92.1%
Auburn-Opelika, AL 55.3 52.0 55.0 91.4%
Clarksville, TN-KY 85.5 81.1 85.1 91.1%
La Crosse, WI-MN 75.8 73.0 75.5 90.4%
Midland, TX 71.4 65.4 70.8 90.3%
Corvallis, OR 38.8 36.9 38.6 90.2%
Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 470.6 454.8 469.0 90.2%
Odessa, TX 64.5 58.1 63.7 87.8%
Bay City, MI 38.4 36.0 38.1 87.0%
Peoria, IL 189.9 174.0 187.4 84.8%
Owensboro, KY 51.6 48.9 51.2 84.6%
Springfield, IL 112.7 110.1 112.3 83.7%
Des Moines, IA 326.8 314.1 324.6 82.6%
Charleston, WV 153.5 147.3 152.4 82.2%
Lafayette, IN 96.5 90.0 95.2 80.9%
Joplin, MO 80.6 77.9 80.1 79.6%
Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 98.3 91.4 96.9 79.5%
Raleigh-Cary, NC 523.9 492.7 517.4 79.3%
Worcester, MA 330.3 314.0 326.9 79.2%
Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 554.1 535.2 550.2 79.2%
Rapid City, SD 62.1 60.1 61.7 78.9%
Rochester, MN 107.0 101.8 105.9 78.6%
Provo-Orem, UT 191.7 176.3 188.4 78.6%
Johnstown, PA 62.2 59.5 61.6 78.5%
Billings, MT 81.6 78.0 80.8 78.0%
Knoxville, TN 337.7 318.0 333.3 77.6%

IHS Global Insight 32


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Jonesboro, AR 49.3 48.1 49.1 77.6%
Lewiston, ID-WA 51.5 48.7 50.8 77.4%
Harrisonburg, VA 63.9 61.0 63.2 77.2%
Wenatchee, WA 40.6 38.0 40.0 76.0%
Cedar Rapids, IA 140.8 136.6 139.8 75.3%
Casper, WY 41.6 37.8 40.7 74.7%
Salt Lake City, UT 644.0 603.8 633.8 74.5%
Utica-Rome, NY 133.8 129.0 132.6 74.4%
Winchester, VA-WV 58.5 53.4 57.2 74.3%
Reading, PA 174.9 164.8 172.2 73.2%
Ann Arbor, MI 203.1 191.5 199.9 72.5%
Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 57.4 54.2 56.5 70.2%
Louisville, KY-IN 626.6 589.1 615.1 69.4%
York-Hanover, PA 183.8 171.8 180.1 69.3%
Cheyenne, WY 45.2 43.3 44.6 68.8%
Syracuse, NY 325.1 311.8 320.8 68.1%
Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 126.8 113.6 122.5 67.7%
Holland-Grand Haven, MI 113.8 100.9 109.6 67.6%
Eau Claire, WI 83.9 78.9 82.3 66.8%
Palm Coast, FL 19.1 17.9 18.7 66.0%
Fort Wayne, IN 219.5 198.0 212.2 65.9%
Columbus, OH 945.2 896.3 928.4 65.7%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 920.3 841.7 893.0 65.3%
Lexington-Fayette, KY 258.9 243.6 253.6 65.0%
Bangor, ME 74.6 70.5 73.1 64.6%
Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 255.9 245.5 252.1 64.2%
Tulsa, OK 434.2 404.1 423.3 63.9%
Lynchburg, VA 109.6 102.1 106.9 63.5%
Springfield, MA 293.0 281.5 288.8 63.4%
Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 389.8 354.2 376.8 63.3%
Springfield, MO 201.3 189.9 196.9 61.8%
Sherman-Denison, TX 43.8 42.3 43.2 61.1%
Charleston-North Charleston, SC 301.7 280.1 293.2 60.6%
Merced, CA 59.0 54.9 57.4 60.2%
Columbus, IN 46.3 41.2 44.2 59.7%
Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 858.8 802.0 835.8 59.4%
Lansing-East Lansing, MI 227.8 212.6 221.6 59.0%
Durham, NC 292.0 277.9 286.2 58.8%
Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 58.2 56.0 57.3 57.9%
Hattiesburg, MS 61.6 58.3 60.2 57.6%
Green Bay, WI 170.5 163.6 167.6 57.6%
Honolulu, HI 457.4 432.6 446.8 57.4%
Columbus, GA-AL 122.1 116.7 119.7 55.8%
Erie, PA 134.0 125.3 130.1 55.8%

IHS Global Insight 33


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Akron, OH 343.0 314.3 330.2 55.3%
Boulder, CO 169.2 158.0 164.2 55.2%
Winston-Salem, NC 220.4 203.2 212.6 55.0%
Hanford-Corcoran, CA 37.7 35.3 36.6 54.3%
Elizabethtown, KY 48.7 45.1 47.0 54.2%
New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8,647.2 8,261.9 8,470.6 54.2%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 1,798.7 1,684.6 1,746.4 54.2%
Jacksonville, NC 47.9 46.8 47.4 54.1%
Bakersfield, CA 239.1 221.6 231.0 53.9%
Appleton, WI 119.8 114.6 117.4 53.6%
Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 1,051.5 979.2 1,017.7 53.3%
Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 76.8 72.5 74.8 53.3%
Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 111.5 105.0 108.4 52.5%
Bloomington-Normal, IL 92.6 89.6 91.2 52.0%
Danville, VA 41.4 38.5 40.0 51.6%
Anderson, SC 64.8 58.0 61.5 50.5%
Huntsville, AL 215.1 207.1 211.1 50.4%
Williamsport, PA 54.1 51.4 52.7 50.1%
Lake Charles, LA 95.3 88.6 91.9 50.1%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,766.7 1,631.4 1,698.2 49.3%
Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 190.4 177.5 183.9 49.3%
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 96.3 84.4 90.3 49.3%
Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL 85.3 76.9 81.0 49.2%
Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR 349.3 334.7 341.9 49.0%
Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 241.1 218.0 229.2 48.4%
Denver-Aurora, CO 1,258.5 1,186.2 1,221.1 48.3%
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 346.0 332.1 338.7 48.0%
Baltimore-Towson, MD 1,323.6 1,265.2 1,293.1 47.8%
Kingston, NY 123.6 115.8 119.5 47.6%
Chattanooga, TN-GA 248.2 225.1 236.1 47.4%
Kokomo, IN 46.8 36.8 41.5 47.0%
San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 1,312.7 1,214.0 1,259.8 46.4%
Dover, DE 66.5 62.2 64.2 46.2%
Jefferson City, MO 80.2 77.0 78.4 45.7%
Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 146.3 135.5 140.4 45.4%
Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 166.2 156.7 161.0 45.1%
Columbia, SC 368.0 341.6 353.4 44.7%
Orlando, FL 1,094.2 992.7 1,037.5 44.1%
Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 91.2 82.9 86.5 43.8%
Altoona, PA 62.8 59.7 61.0 43.2%
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 1,042.9 960.4 995.9 43.1%
Glens Falls, NY 56.8 53.4 54.8 43.0%
Elmira, NY 41.5 39.2 40.2 42.8%
Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH 73.4 68.5 70.6 42.8%

IHS Global Insight 34


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 269.5 256.9 262.3 42.8%
Alexandria, LA 67.7 63.3 65.2 42.6%
Flagstaff, AZ 66.1 60.9 63.1 42.0%
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 452.1 432.9 440.9 41.6%
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 440.2 407.7 421.0 41.0%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 2,820.8 2,685.4 2,740.6 40.8%
St. Cloud, MN 103.1 96.7 99.3 40.3%
Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 644.7 603.6 620.0 39.9%
Springfield, OH 53.0 48.2 50.1 39.7%
Greenville, SC 321.2 292.1 303.6 39.5%
Lima, OH 56.0 51.7 53.4 39.2%
Greenville, NC 78.8 74.2 76.0 39.1%
Kansas City, MO-KS 1,020.0 959.2 983.0 39.1%
Iowa City, IA 91.4 88.5 89.6 38.5%
Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 868.6 796.7 824.4 38.5%
Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 263.3 251.7 256.1 38.5%
Bloomington, IN 84.5 79.7 81.5 38.1%
Mobile, AL 185.9 172.7 177.7 37.7%
Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 65.7 58.9 61.4 37.5%
Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 49.3 43.6 45.7 37.5%
Bowling Green, KY 62.6 58.2 59.8 36.8%
St. Louis, MO-IL 1,364.3 1,282.6 1,312.7 36.8%
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 173.0 153.6 160.7 36.6%
Decatur, IL 55.3 51.6 53.0 36.6%
Redding, CA 65.5 57.3 60.3 36.5%
Visalia-Porterville, CA 114.5 104.6 108.2 36.3%
Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 48.0 43.4 45.1 36.3%
Boise City-Nampa, ID 278.6 250.4 260.6 36.2%
Manchester-Nashua, NH 207.6 194.9 199.5 36.2%
South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 144.2 130.3 135.3 36.1%
Jackson, MS 263.0 250.0 254.7 36.1%
Indianapolis, IN 921.1 864.0 884.6 36.0%
Toledo, OH 328.4 294.8 306.5 34.8%
Greeley, CO 83.2 77.4 79.4 34.8%
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 1,251.3 1,113.9 1,161.6 34.7%
Fond du Lac, WI 48.9 44.3 45.9 34.4%
Roanoke, VA 163.4 153.3 156.8 34.2%
Medford, OR 84.2 73.8 77.4 34.1%
Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 333.0 318.0 323.1 34.1%
Lancaster, PA 239.8 225.3 230.2 34.0%
Colorado Springs, CO 261.9 243.2 249.5 33.8%
Battle Creek, MI 59.2 54.2 55.9 33.7%
Farmington, NM 53.1 47.8 49.6 33.7%
Jacksonville, FL 636.0 578.8 598.0 33.7%

IHS Global Insight 35


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Punta Gorda, FL 45.2 40.1 41.8 33.6%
Ames, IA 48.1 46.0 46.7 32.5%
Trenton-Ewing, NJ 244.3 234.4 237.6 32.5%
Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 19.8 19.2 19.4 32.1%
New Haven-Milford, CT 383.3 356.2 364.9 32.0%
Memphis, TN-MS-AR 641.2 581.8 600.3 31.1%
Greensboro-High Point, NC 373.1 336.9 348.1 30.8%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL 2,419.0 2,176.2 2,250.6 30.7%
Olympia, WA 103.9 96.7 98.9 30.6%
Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 120.9 113.5 115.8 30.2%
Topeka, KS 111.7 105.8 107.6 30.0%
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 297.5 271.8 279.5 30.0%
Elkhart-Goshen, IN 130.1 95.0 105.4 29.8%
Ocean City, NJ 43.7 40.9 41.7 29.8%
Napa, CA 65.6 58.1 60.4 29.8%
Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 4,563.3 4,234.5 4,332.2 29.7%
Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 63.9 59.6 60.8 29.4%
Tuscaloosa, AL 98.9 92.0 94.0 29.2%
Asheville, NC 178.2 166.0 169.6 29.2%
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1,923.9 1,679.9 1,750.9 29.1%
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 217.2 207.8 210.6 29.1%
Canton-Massillon, OH 173.8 158.2 162.7 28.7%
Athens-Clarke County, GA 86.0 79.5 81.4 28.1%
Duluth, MN-WI 134.0 127.4 129.3 28.0%
Spartanburg, SC 130.1 116.5 120.3 27.9%
Jackson, MI 59.4 52.8 54.6 27.9%
Coeur d'Alene, ID 58.2 51.8 53.6 27.8%
Santa Fe, NM 65.5 60.3 61.7 27.5%
Idaho Falls, ID 52.2 48.3 49.3 27.4%
Modesto, CA 161.0 144.4 148.9 27.4%
Macon, GA 102.6 94.6 96.7 26.9%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 2,044.1 1,878.0 1,922.2 26.7%
Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 72.3 67.7 68.9 26.2%
San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 104.5 95.2 97.5 25.4%
Sumter, SC 40.3 36.1 37.1 25.2%
El Centro, CA 47.2 44.1 44.9 25.1%
Tucson, AZ 385.6 350.9 359.6 24.9%
Florence, SC 89.0 81.7 83.5 24.7%
Yuba City, CA 42.1 35.9 37.4 24.6%
Wichita, KS 308.7 282.9 289.3 24.6%
Monroe, LA 79.4 75.4 76.4 24.3%
Albany, GA 64.8 60.5 61.6 24.3%
Binghamton, NY 115.3 108.8 110.3 24.0%
Decatur, AL 59.5 52.7 54.4 24.0%

IHS Global Insight 36


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Grand Junction, CO 66.5 57.1 59.3 23.5%
St. George, UT 55.0 45.5 47.7 23.5%
Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 1,075.4 986.7 1,007.0 22.9%
Sheboygan, WI 64.8 58.1 59.6 22.8%
Pocatello, ID 39.4 35.4 36.3 22.2%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1,274.1 1,105.7 1,143.0 22.1%
Salinas, CA 129.5 119.9 122.0 22.0%
Salem, OR 153.4 138.9 142.1 21.7%
Chico, CA 76.8 69.3 70.9 21.6%
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 234.3 193.7 202.4 21.5%
Rockford, IL 162.0 142.2 146.4 21.4%
Bellingham, WA 85.6 77.3 79.1 20.9%
Stockton, CA 211.6 186.5 191.7 20.7%
Wilmington, NC 148.6 134.2 137.1 20.7%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 5,645.6 5,109.0 5,220.0 20.7%
Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 76.8 71.8 72.9 20.6%
Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 1,973.7 1,721.6 1,773.0 20.4%
Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 127.7 116.1 118.5 20.3%
Burlington, NC 61.6 55.0 56.4 20.3%
Cleveland, TN 42.0 38.6 39.2 20.1%
Longview, WA 38.5 34.4 35.2 19.6%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 2,458.6 2,239.9 2,282.5 19.5%
Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 721.4 667.7 678.1 19.4%
Barnstable Town, MA 95.6 88.3 89.7 19.4%
Gainesville, GA 79.1 70.9 72.4 19.1%
Salisbury, MD 56.0 52.0 52.8 19.1%
Albuquerque, NM 396.6 369.3 374.5 19.0%
Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 103.2 94.6 96.3 18.9%
Jackson, TN 62.6 57.2 58.3 18.9%
Wausau, WI 73.8 66.8 68.1 18.8%
Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 930.1 796.2 820.5 18.2%
Spokane, WA 220.1 203.1 206.1 17.9%
Dayton, OH 404.4 368.6 375.0 17.9%
Lewiston-Auburn, ME 27.7 25.0 25.5 17.8%
Richmond, VA 634.1 592.8 600.2 17.8%
Fort Smith, AR-OK 126.4 115.9 117.7 17.4%
Anderson, IN 41.9 39.1 39.5 17.3%
Port St. Lucie-Fort Pierce, FL 135.1 119.3 122.0 17.1%
Naples-Marco Island, FL 132.0 107.5 111.7 17.0%
Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 62.4 57.2 58.1 17.0%
Racine, WI 80.8 73.8 75.0 16.8%
Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 904.5 796.5 814.6 16.7%
Ocala, FL 107.5 89.6 92.6 16.6%
Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 173.8 156.2 159.1 16.6%

IHS Global Insight 37


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Missoula, MT 57.5 51.4 52.4 16.5%
Monroe, MI 43.8 36.7 37.9 16.4%
Bend, OR 71.7 59.9 61.9 16.4%
Fresno, CA 308.1 277.4 282.2 15.7%
Morristown, TN 50.8 44.4 45.4 15.6%
Dothan, AL 63.5 55.8 57.0 15.6%
Yakima, WA 79.2 74.0 74.8 15.6%
Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL 279.5 238.5 244.8 15.5%
Mansfield, OH 58.1 51.3 52.3 15.3%
Lake Havasu, AZ 55.0 45.1 46.6 14.9%
Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 65.4 58.1 59.2 14.9%
Baton Rouge, LA 377.2 360.7 363.1 14.8%
Gadsden, AL 38.5 34.9 35.4 14.6%
Vero Beach, FL 50.2 42.8 43.8 14.2%
Johnson City, TN 82.1 77.1 77.8 14.2%
Atlantic City, NJ 150.8 133.0 135.4 13.9%
Lakeland, FL 212.5 192.3 195.0 13.5%
Savannah, GA 161.7 148.3 150.1 13.1%
Terre Haute, IN 74.6 70.2 70.7 12.6%
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 191.0 167.7 170.6 12.5%
Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 86.8 80.5 81.2 12.2%
Montgomery, AL 181.0 164.8 166.7 12.0%
St. Joseph, MO-KS 60.0 55.3 55.8 11.9%
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 214.6 188.3 191.4 11.9%
Birmingham-Hoover, AL 533.2 488.1 493.4 11.7%
Gainesville, FL 134.5 125.8 126.8 11.6%
Eugene-Springfield, OR 157.6 139.4 141.5 11.6%
Pascagoula, MS 61.0 57.3 57.7 11.3%
Lawton, OK 44.2 43.1 43.2 10.6%
Janesville, WI 69.8 60.8 61.7 10.5%
Yuma, AZ 54.4 48.4 49.0 10.1%
Michigan City-La Porte, IN 47.1 41.7 42.2 10.0%
Rocky Mount, NC 66.2 59.0 59.7 9.8%
Muncie, IN 53.3 48.5 49.0 9.7%
Pine Bluff, AR 39.2 36.2 36.4 9.0%
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 779.2 726.5 731.0 8.6%
Tallahassee, FL 178.6 168.0 168.9 8.5%
Anniston-Oxford, AL 53.7 48.4 48.8 7.8%
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 163.7 140.9 142.6 7.4%
Valdosta, GA 57.0 51.2 51.6 7.4%
Prescott, AZ 64.9 52.5 53.4 7.2%
Rome, GA 42.1 37.7 38.0 7.0%
Dalton, GA 78.9 63.6 64.7 6.9%
Madera, CA 35.5 31.8 32.0 6.2%

IHS Global Insight 38


Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012
(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of Jobs


Peak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered
Goldsboro, NC 45.7 41.8 42.0 6.2%
Danville, IL 31.6 28.5 28.7 6.1%
Norwich-New London, CT 137.1 127.2 127.6 4.3%
Brunswick, GA 46.1 40.2 40.4 4.1%
Abilene, TX 68.0 61.7 61.9 4.1%
Wichita Falls, TX 62.2 57.3 57.5 3.0%
Flint, MI 151.3 131.1 131.7 2.8%
Champaign-Urbana, IL 114.2 105.1 105.4 2.7%
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 174.3 160.3 160.5 1.9%
Reno-Sparks, NV 225.2 187.0 187.6 1.6%
Carson City, NV 33.3 28.2 28.2 0.0%

IHS Global Insight 39


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

1 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 55,565 66,229 80,852 95,244 69,990 39,855
2 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 41,748 53,281 62,815 80,015 65,821 37,455
3 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 43,814 48,718 54,433 59,986 51,528 29,733
4 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 40,360 43,273 49,165 44,515 28,405 21,741
5 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 20,383 23,491 26,197 33,412 31,175 16,880
6 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 30,676 46,309 53,893 46,911 36,942 16,697
7 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 26,172 29,219 30,635 35,555 28,197 15,973
8 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 25,843 28,171 28,210 27,049 21,406 12,129
9 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 12,720 16,147 18,882 21,683 19,067 11,600
10 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 20,541 22,462 22,079 22,504 19,882 10,741
11 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 18,090 20,267 21,031 22,955 18,973 10,592
12 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 15,938 17,602 21,628 25,212 20,097 10,428
13 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 14,707 18,358 20,081 20,470 16,040 10,370
14 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 11,202 14,581 15,784 19,477 15,482 9,177
15 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 11,192 12,708 15,359 17,534 15,489 8,364
16 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 13,193 13,618 14,342 15,856 13,419 7,943
17 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 11,063 11,394 12,551 14,433 13,406 7,243
18 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 4,858 6,717 8,449 12,665 10,145 6,392
19 Pittsburgh, PA 6,899 8,277 9,750 11,309 8,343 6,006
20 St. Louis, MO-IL 7,217 9,612 10,481 11,601 9,027 5,559
21 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 7,087 8,263 8,751 9,726 8,013 5,173
22 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 6,058 7,511 9,205 9,879 9,226 5,161
23 Salt Lake City, UT 3,913 5,048 5,563 7,799 7,783 5,066
24 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 6,281 7,084 8,138 9,109 8,443 4,804
25 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 7,301 7,340 7,979 8,590 8,031 4,743
26 El Paso, TX 9,655 10,106 9,608 9,391 7,748 4,686
27 Peoria, IL 8,070 9,625 11,222 14,230 7,846 4,638
28 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 8,473 10,955 12,818 12,624 7,948 4,506
29 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 2,378 5,448 9,115 9,654 7,912 4,327
30 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 8,097 6,647 7,481 10,077 8,451 4,325
31 Austin-Round Rock, TX 7,687 8,205 8,429 7,406 5,964 3,985
32 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 6,088 6,992 7,075 7,885 7,542 3,912
33 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 6,019 6,849 7,303 7,544 6,505 3,562
34 Kansas City, MO-KS 4,915 5,682 6,706 7,800 5,889 3,521
35 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 4,424 4,739 5,711 7,154 6,464 3,291
36 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 3,724 4,745 5,512 5,662 5,316 3,137
37 San Antonio, TX 2,347 3,094 3,568 5,049 4,390 3,102
38 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3,774 4,192 4,971 6,241 5,356 3,070
39 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 2,668 3,285 3,738 5,382 5,392 2,963
40 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 5,021 5,389 5,106 5,260 4,407 2,828
41 Laredo, TX 3,597 4,443 4,704 5,088 4,375 2,716
42 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 4,121 4,183 4,269 5,036 4,133 2,568
43 Rochester, NY 4,374 4,603 5,070 5,353 4,874 2,551
44 Denver-Aurora, CO 2,918 3,844 4,196 4,634 4,310 2,528
45 Baltimore-Towson, MD 4,975 4,822 5,170 5,595 4,809 2,509

IHS Global Insight 40


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

46 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 3,144 3,408 4,143 5,255 3,543 2,499


47 Richmond, VA 3,733 4,531 4,952 5,162 4,097 2,439
48 Wichita, KS 3,915 5,263 5,712 6,846 4,955 2,396
49 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 3,168 3,631 4,042 4,578 3,736 2,100
50 Greensboro-High Point, NC 3,108 3,684 3,844 3,688 3,169 2,057
51 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 1,956 2,137 2,901 4,160 3,443 1,934
52 Baton Rouge, LA 2,234 2,933 3,333 4,121 3,312 1,916
53 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 2,924 3,398 3,319 3,608 3,502 1,916
54 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 3,850 3,375 3,308 4,556 3,205 1,915
55 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 3,455 4,232 4,984 5,194 3,562 1,904
56 Boise City-Nampa, ID 2,670 3,040 3,853 3,851 2,850 1,828
57 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 2,183 2,474 3,045 3,388 2,947 1,801
58 Savannah, GA 1,648 1,951 2,520 3,599 2,725 1,732
59 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 1,440 1,571 1,921 2,692 2,346 1,695
60 Columbus, OH 3,936 3,260 3,489 3,882 2,873 1,679
61 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 3,832 3,265 2,858 2,951 2,662 1,646
62 Akron, OH 2,982 3,499 3,956 4,049 2,958 1,560
63 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 1,858 2,197 2,409 2,631 2,195 1,414
64 Durham, NC 2,969 2,266 2,430 2,688 2,656 1,391
65 Tulsa, OK 2,061 2,238 2,440 2,878 2,441 1,389
66 Evansville, IN-KY 1,252 1,157 1,408 1,442 2,014 1,360
67 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 2,073 2,375 2,425 2,579 2,484 1,296
68 Dayton, OH 3,020 4,215 4,348 4,525 3,771 1,261
69 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 2,195 2,767 2,829 2,994 2,409 1,238
70 Lexington-Fayette, KY 2,096 2,509 2,671 2,491 2,260 1,237
71 Worcester, MA 2,912 2,707 2,475 2,864 2,036 1,233
72 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 1,662 1,724 1,881 2,279 2,004 1,228
73 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 1,433 2,014 2,366 2,659 2,595 1,206
74 Manchester-Nashua, NH 692 1,251 1,450 2,006 1,743 1,170
75 El Centro, CA 1,917 2,184 2,304 2,512 1,993 1,144
76 Lake Charles, LA 508 938 1,314 2,350 1,305 1,136
77 Knoxville, TN 1,372 2,011 2,094 2,313 1,887 1,109
78 Corpus Christi, TX 1,072 1,231 1,551 2,426 1,705 1,096
79 Tucson, AZ 3,015 3,257 2,728 2,878 1,978 1,077
80 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 1,414 1,615 1,843 2,006 1,456 1,052
81 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 824 1,441 1,537 2,024 1,805 1,046
82 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 1,502 1,413 1,879 2,317 1,924 1,028
83 Provo-Orem, UT 1,015 787 1,205 2,218 1,773 980
84 Raleigh-Cary, NC 975 1,759 2,130 2,077 1,799 967
85 Jacksonville, FL 1,201 1,446 1,709 1,973 1,634 952
86 Bakersfield, CA 1,179 1,395 1,594 1,805 1,778 949
87 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 493 542 735 1,190 1,211 935
88 Toledo, OH 1,768 1,998 2,159 2,642 1,411 931
89 Madison, WI 1,159 1,310 1,574 1,596 1,572 923
90 Charleston, WV 1,103 962 1,225 1,716 1,365 902

IHS Global Insight 41


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

91 York-Hanover, PA 1,288 1,662 1,984 2,210 1,723 890


92 New Haven-Milford, CT 1,823 1,548 1,821 2,081 1,595 881
93 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 916 927 1,147 1,353 1,487 876
94 Racine, WI 1,365 1,484 1,651 2,128 1,539 875
95 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 642 912 1,090 1,209 926 869
96 Fresno, CA 1,538 1,600 1,862 1,999 1,660 867
97 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 1,611 1,996 1,921 2,218 2,235 863
98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 890 1,316 1,611 1,609 1,038 841
99 Winston-Salem, NC 1,221 1,507 1,785 1,855 1,742 837
100 Syracuse, NY 1,847 1,992 1,987 2,008 1,315 828
101 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 1,205 1,408 1,522 1,555 1,185 815
102 Columbia, SC 1,456 1,143 1,048 1,483 1,363 787
103 Montgomery, AL 818 834 1,236 1,286 1,143 773
104 Reno-Sparks, NV 877 1,304 1,147 1,317 1,234 765
105 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 796 754 674 1,422 1,450 765
106 Victoria, TX 920 1,168 1,323 1,131 834 729
107 Mobile, AL 1,032 1,373 1,458 1,847 1,492 717
108 Canton-Massillon, OH 601 1,353 1,543 1,850 1,212 715
109 Colorado Springs, CO 1,968 2,227 1,826 1,932 1,281 679
110 Spartanburg, SC 808 950 1,424 1,325 1,118 669
111 Janesville, WI 195 803 1,034 1,452 1,243 659
112 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 717 1,052 1,182 1,168 1,023 655
113 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 1,288 1,120 1,169 1,251 1,187 641
114 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 516 887 1,373 1,384 940 630
115 Reading, PA 606 974 1,022 1,218 943 630
116 Rockford, IL 992 1,186 1,400 1,512 1,253 622
117 Kokomo, IN 1,445 1,458 1,413 1,260 759 605
118 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 838 988 1,213 1,122 965 605
119 Bellingham, WA 632 886 869 1,305 918 579
120 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 1,074 1,107 1,313 1,162 857 568
121 Ann Arbor, MI 1,010 1,171 1,238 1,085 903 560
122 Wilmington, NC 572 597 1,127 1,139 1,079 560
123 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 1,208 1,338 1,364 1,561 788 554
124 Modesto, CA 633 874 916 1,080 999 541
125 Oklahoma City, OK 1,004 869 828 1,234 988 536
126 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 706 793 880 851 855 530
127 Longview, WA 650 551 595 898 1,155 527
128 Appleton, WI 262 975 1,000 1,095 930 521
129 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 947 921 975 1,012 705 518
130 Lubbock, TX 365 843 860 1,017 530 512
131 Fort Wayne, IN 1,311 728 1,010 1,143 917 510
132 Chattanooga, TN-GA 540 710 809 1,053 661 504
133 Yakima, WA 404 478 695 829 801 495
134 Lancaster, PA 606 818 939 1,008 786 482
135 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 322 447 731 1,125 715 463

IHS Global Insight 42


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

136 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 928 987 973 1,118 880 462


137 Springfield, MA 773 873 965 1,009 813 461
138 Visalia-Porterville, CA 321 481 580 735 572 458
139 Erie, PA 936 1,178 1,135 1,862 1,408 456
140 Greeley, CO 529 736 792 1,005 713 456
141 Rochester, MN 1,044 847 1,007 938 780 453
142 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 877 1,027 1,057 1,077 785 447
143 Decatur, AL 722 703 773 549 531 442
144 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 469 550 422 622 737 441
145 Boulder, CO 703 937 899 892 727 437
146 Huntsville, AL 1,105 1,252 1,053 1,079 1,137 437
147 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 787 828 789 875 667 428
148 Stockton, CA 629 707 757 812 789 427
149 Salinas, CA 498 573 696 778 718 419
150 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 1,189 1,250 1,323 1,411 1,694 418
151 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 545 693 753 795 740 414
152 Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 588 611 743 815 704 410
153 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 521 602 772 849 747 404
154 Champaign-Urbana, IL 470 497 601 642 661 403
155 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 576 669 665 720 626 402
156 Asheville, NC 592 665 713 792 682 393
157 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 729 826 957 1,007 811 393
158 Bloomington, IN 315 426 454 481 629 386
159 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 256 467 536 568 372 386
160 Spokane, WA 579 691 879 895 662 378
161 Lakeland, FL 375 393 572 695 649 374
162 Lincoln, NE 448 586 666 733 683 371
163 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 657 721 765 783 556 367
164 Lima, OH 254 295 818 685 487 366
165 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 624 687 786 1,035 782 364
166 Rocky Mount, NC 422 535 569 603 510 362
167 Salisbury, MD 159 229 336 459 452 357
168 Cedar Rapids, IA 587 654 817 910 735 354
169 Battle Creek, MI 511 534 538 552 529 350
170 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 383 459 631 740 658 348
171 Columbus, IN 303 911 1,016 1,072 549 346
172 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 453 573 615 679 623 343
173 Florence, SC 669 653 871 681 478 340
174 Roanoke, VA 524 545 575 669 582 338
175 St. Joseph, MO-KS 285 325 386 393 460 323
176 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 589 698 557 631 584 322
177 Anderson, SC 417 527 565 545 464 307
178 Las Cruces, NM 425 427 495 527 521 306
179 Utica-Rome, NY 484 545 579 652 495 302
180 Green Bay, WI 384 432 564 622 496 299

IHS Global Insight 43


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

181 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 117 209 273 408 505 295


182 Brunswick, GA 398 448 458 512 498 292
183 La Crosse, WI-MN 436 512 606 692 600 286
184 Sheboygan, WI 426 442 501 590 478 282
185 Gainesville, GA 200 391 473 535 442 281
186 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 436 516 508 651 496 278
187 Albuquerque, NM 1,977 2,229 979 475 358 273
188 Jackson, MS 904 940 601 677 432 268
189 Binghamton, NY 427 488 498 432 340 264
190 Greenville, NC 261 437 380 410 398 261
191 Fargo, ND-MN 310 336 488 677 466 256
192 Lafayette, IN 632 539 564 676 469 253
193 Honolulu, HI 210 266 360 546 358 252
194 Longview, TX 334 268 299 427 357 247
195 Topeka, KS 284 366 400 446 442 243
196 Fond du Lac, WI 473 522 530 497 390 242
197 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 229 324 385 449 323 236
198 Lafayette, LA 376 519 587 763 657 234
199 Harrisonburg, VA 316 362 452 625 682 233
200 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 321 456 508 586 661 232
201 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 317 515 553 445 250 229
202 Duluth, MN-WI 373 393 620 819 318 227
203 Merced, CA 248 325 450 488 397 227
204 Salem, OR 211 263 285 332 325 225
205 Flint, MI 1,203 1,129 1,083 801 354 217
206 Dalton, GA 504 501 480 552 392 214
207 Yuba City, CA 258 271 298 401 314 207
208 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 151 225 266 408 348 202
209 Pittsfield, MA 498 462 464 389 257 199
210 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 193 268 273 288 272 198
211 Columbus, GA-AL 385 485 630 572 384 196
212 Fort Smith, AR-OK 268 339 358 388 318 195
213 Eau Claire, WI 445 427 340 417 379 195
214 Eugene-Springfield, OR 774 828 909 781 314 193
215 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 217 256 314 468 408 191
216 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 178 170 198 283 237 178
217 Sherman-Denison, TX 196 261 459 421 408 177
218 Wenatchee, WA 286 276 312 377 381 175
219 Olympia, WA 106 129 154 175 154 175
220 Naples-Marco Island, FL 164 182 257 324 313 174
221 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 10 131 202 246 230 173
222 Auburn-Opelika, AL 47 105 184 193 193 171
223 Lynchburg, VA 319 385 366 384 357 171
224 Macon, GA 437 163 168 246 254 170
225 Springfield, MO 306 279 331 372 293 168

IHS Global Insight 44


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

226 Terre Haute, IN 366 368 373 371 297 165


227 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 274 447 500 502 245 163
228 Iowa City, IA 253 209 202 234 263 154
229 Monroe, MI 264 286 273 326 229 152
230 Corvallis, OR 602 342 352 357 241 151
231 Sioux Falls, SD 112 115 183 234 203 149
232 Port St. Lucie, FL 189 228 259 272 240 144
233 Springfield, OH 226 380 286 258 215 144
234 Waco, TX 135 193 191 266 230 143
235 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 109 127 195 227 204 143
236 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 97 267 307 341 218 140
237 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 59 208 243 320 272 139
238 Jackson, TN 379 254 255 258 202 138
239 Morristown, TN 254 288 338 381 252 135
240 Winchester, VA-WV 228 232 255 198 169 135
241 Charlottesville, VA 182 238 269 276 244 134
242 Fayetteville, NC 497 295 322 300 218 134
243 Jackson, MI 230 254 293 351 195 133
244 Logan, UT-ID 149 162 174 396 218 132
245 Lebanon, PA 85 184 184 215 195 131
246 Mansfield, OH 360 345 343 357 236 129
247 Coeur d'Alene, ID 46 60 72 172 215 129
248 Norwich-New London, CT 219 259 505 532 265 129
249 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 217 172 205 223 225 127
250 Hattiesburg, MS 74 80 111 159 183 126
251 Bowling Green, KY 340 294 556 340 239 124
252 Williamsport, PA 231 236 251 272 205 122
253 Burlington, NC 102 296 262 267 205 121
254 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 146 167 197 247 221 120
255 Wausau, WI 215 211 291 239 203 120
256 Columbia, MO 127 182 206 235 211 119
257 Idaho Falls, ID 127 168 165 218 214 117
258 Clarksville, TN-KY 303 324 310 311 158 116
259 Ithaca, NY 123 141 177 187 172 116
260 Gainesville, FL 187 192 227 285 233 115
261 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 95 128 175 256 161 109
262 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 155 216 187 405 328 109
263 Odessa, TX 57 171 183 156 188 109
264 Danville, IL 189 201 281 244 200 109
265 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 191 184 223 305 186 108
266 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 195 238 217 224 155 108
267 Bloomington-Normal, IL 122 187 345 330 143 107
268 Altoona, PA 165 157 150 198 158 107
269 Athens-Clarke County, GA 228 152 182 171 215 105
270 Kingston, NY 115 160 173 187 166 104

IHS Global Insight 45


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

271 St. Cloud, MN 105 195 303 286 196 103


272 Amarillo, TX 154 165 221 281 144 103
273 Madera, CA 127 159 120 153 202 100
274 Ames, IA 123 150 187 285 160 100
275 Sandusky, OH 404 253 289 270 200 98
276 Glens Falls, NY 67 127 157 170 166 97
277 Anniston-Oxford, AL 161 171 147 214 174 94
278 Yuma, AZ 216 302 274 258 197 92
279 Napa, CA 117 181 194 219 161 91
280 State College, PA 134 187 259 271 159 89
281 Pine Bluff, AR 251 92 100 124 144 87
282 Joplin, MO 155 200 180 191 167 86
283 Cleveland, TN 167 191 173 143 141 86
284 Chico, CA 128 136 152 170 180 86
285 Ocala, FL 133 131 155 178 144 86
286 Albany, GA 158 278 167 88 93 86
287 Tyler, TX 175 206 181 147 130 83
288 Jefferson City, MO 144 165 175 221 182 81
289 Bay City, MI 192 113 96 125 137 81
290 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ n/a 32 38 43 138 76
291 Dothan, AL 125 115 81 122 179 75
292 San Angelo, TX 10 11 117 145 173 74
293 Carson City, NV 235 167 141 162 141 74
294 Wichita Falls, TX 185 212 225 190 163 71
295 Grand Forks, ND-MN 152 221 233 255 178 71
296 Muncie, IN 131 117 145 126 90 70
297 Flagstaff, AZ 70 71 81 107 134 68
298 Springfield, IL 62 53 66 87 87 68
299 Elmira, NY 551 137 141 155 127 68
300 Elizabethtown, KY 236 231 226 173 106 67
301 Valdosta, GA 81 95 92 73 101 67
302 Monroe, LA 121 112 95 89 82 65
303 Danville, VA 183 116 100 115 102 61
304 Tallahassee, FL 57 62 87 119 108 60
305 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 81 90 98 118 90 60
306 Barnstable Town, MA 80 92 102 138 117 57
307 Johnstown, PA 60 77 57 97 89 56
308 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 145 153 139 189 110 56
309 Dubuque, IA 108 125 138 157 128 55
310 Pueblo, CO 175 172 193 133 118 55
311 Johnson City, TN 79 126 131 120 82 55
312 Pocatello, ID 156 165 151 166 111 54
313 Medford, OR 115 173 149 97 108 53
314 Bend, OR 59 73 72 82 67 51
315 Goldsboro, NC 83 130 158 145 136 51

IHS Global Insight 46


Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

316 Bangor, ME 123 212 161 115 113 51


317 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 151 139 169 135 97 49
318 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 65 90 93 99 102 46
319 Lawrence, KS 55 62 85 89 73 44
320 Great Falls, MT 27 37 47 89 69 43
321 Billings, MT 66 75 62 89 71 43
322 Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 117 108 183 391 139 43
323 Owensboro, KY 166 174 119 130 101 42
324 Anchorage, AK 152 370 417 246 214 40
325 Grand Junction, CO 81 70 66 76 68 40
326 St. George, UT 27 21 24 36 26 39
327 Jonesboro, AR 95 48 56 85 79 38
328 Sumter, SC 91 92 104 91 66 36
329 Casper, WY 36 52 51 70 79 35
330 Midland, TX 71 74 80 93 76 34
331 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 52 58 92 248 100 34
332 Redding, CA 58 49 61 72 55 33
333 Atlantic City, NJ 51 49 65 61 44 33
334 Alexandria, LA 62 65 59 76 79 32
335 Lewiston, ID-WA 42 38 45 66 52 31
336 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 61 161 148 195 106 31
337 Prescott, AZ 11 30 39 42 37 29
338 Rome, GA 205 127 134 148 79 28
339 College Station-Bryan, TX 67 36 49 55 45 28
340 Warner Robins, GA 67 42 32 161 86 27
341 Morgantown, WV 62 44 53 52 17 27
342 Dover, DE 80 63 74 85 57 24
343 Wheeling, WV-OH 13 208 60 59 62 22
344 Abilene, TX 28 46 53 54 39 21
345 Hot Springs, AR 22 58 47 38 42 20
346 Anderson, IN 81 103 44 56 38 18
347 Bismarck, ND 51 40 46 52 38 17
348 Palm Coast, FL n/a 26 47 48 40 16
349 Ocean City, NJ 44 41 30 38 42 16
350 Missoula, MT 19 20 30 50 25 15
351 Punta Gorda, FL 28 28 33 28 27 14
352 Cumberland, MD-WV 36 35 33 17 21 13
353 Rapid City, SD 100 149 131 101 31 13
354 Cheyenne, WY 13 13 16 27 22 12
355 Gadsden, AL 9 11 14 18 16 10
356 Santa Fe, NM 21 20 20 23 14 9
357 Farmington, NM 20 7 6 10 14 7
*Export data through the first half of 2010

IHS Global Insight 47


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
1 Laredo, TX 71.1 83.4 83.9 86.0 77.7 92.7
2 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 45.7 49.5 52.8 57.3 47.5 59.9
3 Peoria, IL 55.3 60.4 66.2 80.5 45.0 51.6
4 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 31.8 32.6 41.1 56.0 45.8 50.3
5 El Centro, CA 51.2 54.5 54.2 54.4 43.6 48.5
6 Longview, WA 24.2 19.3 19.9 30.6 40.3 35.5
7 El Paso, TX 44.2 42.4 39.0 36.9 29.9 35.0
8 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 10.6 23.6 36.7 38.3 31.7 33.5
9 Kokomo, IN 36.0 35.7 32.2 34.4 22.3 33.5
10 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 41.4 33.8 29.4 29.2 26.1 31.1
11 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 28.6 30.7 31.6 34.5 27.9 30.5
12 Victoria, TX 21.6 24.7 26.8 22.3 18.2 30.5
13 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 21.2 22.0 25.4 31.4 21.2 29.0
14 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 9.5 10.0 12.5 18.5 18.8 27.9
15 Janesville, WI 4.1 15.7 20.2 29.5 26.4 27.4
16 Savannah, GA 14.5 15.7 19.4 27.8 21.4 26.9
17 Racine, WI 21.8 22.5 24.6 32.7 23.7 26.2
18 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 13.8 13.8 17.2 21.5 22.7 25.7
19 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 20.1 21.8 24.0 22.6 14.9 22.2
20 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 10.5 10.6 11.6 17.1 14.9 20.9
21 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 13.8 16.0 16.8 20.3 18.1 19.7
22 Lake Charles, LA 3.1 6.1 10.0 18.3 11.6 19.4
23 Brunswick, GA 13.3 13.9 14.0 15.4 15.4 18.4
24 Decatur, AL 17.0 15.5 16.2 11.4 11.3 18.4
25 Wichita, KS 17.5 20.6 20.5 24.7 19.1 18.4
26 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 13.1 15.6 16.8 17.6 14.0 18.3
27 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 7.1 10.1 12.5 18.1 15.2 18.2
28 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 9.2 13.3 15.5 17.6 12.4 18.0
29 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 19.7 17.7 18.3 18.4 12.4 17.8
30 Salisbury, MD 4.4 5.9 8.3 11.1 11.0 17.3
31 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 10.2 11.4 8.2 12.2 14.3 16.8
32 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 12.3 13.6 15.8 17.8 15.9 16.8
33 Columbus, IN 8.8 24.3 25.3 25.3 13.8 16.2
34 Lima, OH 6.0 6.8 19.0 16.4 11.2 16.2
35 Evansville, IN-KY 8.5 7.5 8.9 8.9 12.3 15.8
36 Salt Lake City, UT 7.5 8.8 8.9 12.0 12.1 15.3
37 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 11.5 13.1 13.5 15.7 13.0 14.9
38 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 19.9 20.2 18.9 17.9 14.4 14.8
39 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 10.8 11.6 12.8 14.2 13.3 14.8
40 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 11.7 15.7 17.0 19.0 21.2 14.7
41 St. Joseph, MO-KS 8.1 8.5 9.3 9.3 10.5 14.6
42 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 16.4 22.9 24.4 20.6 16.4 14.6
43 Boise City-Nampa, ID 11.3 12.6 15.0 15.2 11.5 14.4
44 Bellingham, WA 8.2 12.0 10.9 16.4 11.6 14.2
45 Battle Creek, MI 11.1 11.8 11.6 11.7 10.8 13.8

IHS Global Insight 48


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
46 Yakima, WA 6.4 7.3 9.8 11.2 11.1 13.7
47 Rocky Mount, NC 8.2 10.1 10.9 11.5 9.6 13.5
48 Corpus Christi, TX 7.7 8.2 9.3 14.3 10.7 13.4
49 Provo-Orem, UT 8.8 6.1 8.4 15.2 12.3 13.3
50 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 8.6 9.3 9.9 12.8 12.3 13.2
51 Fond du Lac, WI 14.2 15.1 14.8 13.7 11.1 13.1
52 Anderson, SC 9.8 11.9 12.4 12.0 10.3 13.0
53 Spartanburg, SC 8.7 9.8 13.9 12.8 11.0 12.7
54 Greeley, CO 8.5 11.2 11.1 13.6 10.1 12.5
55 Greensboro-High Point, NC 10.5 11.9 11.7 11.1 9.6 12.0
56 Bloomington, IN 6.1 7.7 7.9 8.0 9.9 11.9
57 Charleston, WV 9.0 7.4 9.0 12.2 9.4 11.9
58 York-Hanover, PA 9.7 12.1 13.8 15.0 11.8 11.8
59 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 9.5 11.1 10.8 13.9 10.8 11.8
60 Akron, OH 11.7 13.4 14.5 14.8 11.1 11.4
61 Rochester, NY 10.6 10.7 11.8 12.4 11.1 11.3
62 Canton-Massillon, OH 4.8 10.8 12.1 14.1 9.7 11.2
63 Manchester-Nashua, NH 3.6 6.4 7.2 9.5 8.3 11.2
64 Sheboygan, WI 8.9 8.9 9.8 11.8 9.7 11.1
65 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 2.1 4.2 5.3 7.8 9.6 10.9
66 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 7.4 8.9 9.9 10.1 9.5 10.8
67 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 11.4 11.5 10.7 11.9 9.0 10.8
68 Lexington-Fayette, KY 10.4 11.8 12.1 11.2 10.2 10.7
69 Las Cruces, NM 9.7 9.2 9.9 10.2 9.4 10.7
70 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 7.6 8.5 10.4 9.9 8.8 10.7
71 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 12.0 10.1 10.0 10.6 9.9 10.6
72 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 9.0 9.7 11.4 13.0 10.5 10.6
73 Pittsburgh, PA 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.2 7.6 10.5
74 Appleton, WI 3.0 10.7 10.5 11.7 9.7 10.5
75 Montgomery, AL 6.2 6.0 8.6 8.8 7.8 10.4
76 Lubbock, TX 4.4 9.6 9.5 10.6 5.5 10.4
77 Sherman-Denison, TX 6.8 8.4 14.5 12.9 12.4 10.3
78 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 11.0 8.5 9.1 12.1 10.4 10.3
79 La Crosse, WI-MN 9.3 10.5 12.0 13.2 11.1 10.1
80 Rockford, IL 8.8 10.0 11.3 12.4 10.5 10.0
81 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 7.2 8.2 8.4 9.3 7.8 9.9
82 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 0.4 4.9 7.0 7.6 7.1 9.9
83 Erie, PA 11.1 13.5 12.4 19.8 15.5 9.8
84 Baton Rouge, LA 6.0 7.6 8.7 10.6 8.6 9.8
85 Rochester, MN 13.0 10.3 12.0 10.9 8.9 9.8
86 Wenatchee, WA 9.2 8.3 9.0 10.4 10.6 9.6
87 Florence, SC 10.4 9.7 12.2 9.7 6.8 9.6
88 Auburn-Opelika, AL 1.6 3.2 5.3 5.5 5.4 9.5
89 Austin-Round Rock, TX 11.6 11.2 11.0 9.2 7.5 9.4
90 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 11.2 9.3 8.9 11.9 8.1 9.4

IHS Global Insight 49


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
91 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 8.7 8.5 8.6 9.3 7.9 9.3
92 Danville, IL 8.7 8.9 12.5 10.6 8.6 9.2
93 Mobile, AL 8.1 9.7 9.9 12.1 9.8 9.2
94 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 8.2 7.9 8.2 8.7 8.0 9.1
95 Champaign-Urbana, IL 6.6 6.6 7.5 7.5 7.6 9.1
96 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 9.0 9.6 9.0 9.9 9.0 9.0
97 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 4.5 5.2 5.9 8.3 8.4 9.0
98 Yuba City, CA 6.5 6.4 6.7 8.6 6.8 8.9
99 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 3.7 5.1 5.9 6.5 4.9 8.9
100 Gainesville, GA 3.4 6.6 7.6 8.3 7.0 8.8
101 St. Louis, MO-IL 6.2 8.1 8.4 9.0 7.1 8.6
102 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 5.8 7.1 7.6 8.1 7.7 8.6
103 Worcester, MA 11.3 10.1 9.0 10.1 7.3 8.5
104 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 9.0 10.4 12.0 12.3 8.2 8.5
105 Reading, PA 4.7 7.0 7.1 8.4 6.6 8.5
106 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 8.1 8.7 9.0 9.1 7.9 8.5
107 Monroe, MI 6.9 7.3 6.9 8.8 6.4 8.3
108 Visalia-Porterville, CA 3.2 4.7 5.0 6.4 5.2 8.1
109 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 6.6 6.9 7.4 8.0 7.2 8.1
110 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 5.6 7.4 8.4 9.3 9.0 8.1
111 Morristown, TN 7.8 8.6 10.1 11.6 7.9 8.1
112 Springfield, OH 6.6 10.8 8.1 7.3 6.0 8.1
113 Wilmington, NC 5.0 5.0 8.6 8.5 7.9 8.1
114 Greenville, NC 5.3 8.3 6.5 6.8 6.4 8.1
115 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 3.0 8.1 8.9 9.7 6.5 8.0
116 Dalton, GA 8.7 8.8 8.0 9.5 7.5 8.0
117 Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 7.6 7.8 8.5 8.9 7.3 8.0
118 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 5.9 6.8 7.7 8.3 7.4 7.9
119 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 8.3 10.0 9.4 10.6 10.4 7.8
120 Logan, UT-ID 5.6 5.8 5.7 12.2 6.6 7.8
121 Richmond, VA 6.6 7.8 8.2 8.3 6.5 7.6
122 San Antonio, TX 3.6 4.4 4.7 6.4 5.6 7.6
123 Dayton, OH 9.3 12.7 13.0 13.6 11.7 7.6
124 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 6.2 6.7 7.0 7.5 5.4 7.6
125 Pittsfield, MA 9.6 8.9 9.0 7.4 4.9 7.6
126 Reno-Sparks, NV 4.9 6.7 5.3 6.2 6.2 7.6
127 Harrisonburg, VA 6.5 7.1 8.3 11.3 11.5 7.6
128 Knoxville, TN 5.2 7.3 7.4 7.9 6.6 7.5
129 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 7.0 8.5 8.6 9.4 7.5 7.5
130 Winston-Salem, NC 5.9 7.2 8.3 8.6 8.0 7.5
131 Merced, CA 4.6 5.8 7.0 7.9 6.8 7.5
132 Durham, NC 11.4 7.3 7.2 7.9 7.5 7.5
133 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 7.9 8.9 8.8 8.9 6.7 7.5
134 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 3.4 5.6 5.7 7.4 6.5 7.3
135 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 6.3 6.9 6.7 7.5 7.2 7.3

IHS Global Insight 50


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
136 Mansfield, OH 9.1 8.7 8.9 9.3 6.6 7.2
137 Modesto, CA 4.5 5.9 6.0 7.1 6.6 7.1
138 Lebanon, PA 2.8 5.8 5.4 6.2 5.6 7.1
139 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 7.4 7.4 6.7 6.8 5.7 7.1
140 Toledo, OH 6.9 7.7 8.1 10.2 5.5 7.1
141 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 3.0 3.4 4.5 5.2 5.1 7.0
142 Corvallis, OR 16.0 7.8 7.9 8.0 5.7 6.9
143 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 6.9 7.3 7.2 7.6 6.4 6.8
144 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 7.1 7.7 7.8 9.2 5.0 6.8
145 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 4.3 5.2 5.8 6.5 5.7 6.7
146 Kansas City, MO-KS 5.3 5.9 6.6 7.5 5.7 6.7
147 Utica-Rome, NY 6.2 6.6 6.8 7.6 5.6 6.7
148 Tucson, AZ 10.7 10.6 8.3 8.7 6.2 6.7
149 Bakersfield, CA 5.0 5.3 5.5 6.0 6.4 6.5
150 Binghamton, NY 6.2 6.8 6.5 5.5 4.3 6.4
151 Williamsport, PA 7.0 6.9 7.2 7.8 5.8 6.4
152 Sandusky, OH 13.2 8.2 9.8 9.2 6.9 6.4
153 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 5.1 6.0 6.2 6.1 5.0 6.4
154 Lafayette, IN 9.2 7.6 7.5 8.8 6.1 6.4
155 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 5.2 5.7 6.7 7.7 5.8 6.3
156 Tulsa, OK 5.5 5.4 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.2
157 Eau Claire, WI 8.0 7.4 5.7 7.1 6.3 6.2
158 Ann Arbor, MI 5.9 6.7 6.8 6.1 5.0 6.1
159 Jackson, TN 8.9 5.8 5.8 5.7 4.6 6.1
160 Syracuse, NY 7.9 8.1 7.8 7.7 4.9 6.1
161 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 5.5 5.9 5.9 6.8 5.5 6.0
162 Coeur d'Alene, ID 1.3 1.5 1.7 3.9 5.0 6.0
163 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 6.4 6.5 7.4 6.4 4.7 6.0
164 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 4.8 5.0 5.3 6.2 4.7 6.0
165 Idaho Falls, ID 4.1 4.9 4.4 5.6 5.6 5.9
166 Fresno, CA 5.9 5.7 6.4 6.7 5.7 5.9
167 Ithaca, NY 3.7 4.1 4.9 4.9 4.4 5.8
168 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 4.3 4.3 5.0 6.4 5.8 5.8
169 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6.6 6.7 6.2 6.0 5.5 5.8
170 Terre Haute, IN 7.4 7.1 6.8 6.7 5.4 5.7
171 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 5.7 8.7 9.1 9.2 4.4 5.7
172 Asheville, NC 5.0 5.3 5.4 6.0 5.1 5.7
173 Fort Wayne, IN 8.2 4.3 5.7 6.6 5.3 5.6
174 Bay City, MI 7.3 4.2 3.5 4.5 4.9 5.6
175 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 6.0 6.8 5.1 5.7 5.2 5.6
176 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3.6 3.7 4.3 5.5 4.9 5.6
177 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 1.3 4.5 5.2 6.6 5.5 5.6
178 Burlington, NC 2.5 6.8 5.8 6.0 4.8 5.6
179 Madera, CA 4.0 4.7 3.3 4.2 5.6 5.5
180 Pine Bluff, AR 8.9 3.1 3.3 4.0 4.7 5.5

IHS Global Insight 51


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
181 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 2.1 3.5 3.9 4.2 2.7 5.5
182 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 3.9 4.3 4.6 4.3 4.4 5.4
183 Bowling Green, KY 8.8 7.1 12.8 7.5 5.4 5.4
184 Winchester, VA-WV 5.2 5.0 5.4 4.3 3.5 5.4
185 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 4.5 5.9 4.9 10.4 8.4 5.4
186 Jackson, MI 5.0 5.5 6.0 7.4 4.1 5.4
187 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 4.5 4.4 4.6 5.3 5.0 5.3
188 Carson City, NV 9.0 6.0 4.8 5.7 5.0 5.3
189 Longview, TX 4.7 3.4 3.4 4.5 4.1 5.3
190 Hattiesburg, MS 1.9 1.9 2.4 3.4 3.9 5.3
191 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 2.4 3.0 3.9 5.7 3.8 5.2
192 Madison, WI 3.9 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.6 5.2
193 Ames, IA 3.9 4.4 5.3 7.6 4.2 5.2
194 Colorado Springs, CO 9.0 9.7 7.6 7.8 5.1 5.2
195 Topeka, KS 3.6 4.5 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.2
196 Lincoln, NE 3.7 4.5 4.9 5.4 4.8 5.2
197 Anniston-Oxford, AL 4.9 5.0 4.0 5.6 4.7 5.1
198 Altoona, PA 4.5 4.1 3.7 4.9 3.8 5.1
199 Roanoke, VA 4.6 4.5 4.5 5.1 4.4 5.1
200 Lancaster, PA 3.5 4.6 5.1 5.4 4.2 5.0
201 Cedar Rapids, IA 5.0 5.6 6.2 7.1 5.4 5.0
202 Glens Falls, NY 2.0 3.5 4.3 4.5 4.4 5.0
203 Columbia, SC 5.4 4.0 3.4 4.8 4.4 4.9
204 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 2.3 3.8 5.7 5.6 3.8 4.9
205 Cleveland, TN 5.3 5.8 5.3 4.2 4.1 4.9
206 Boulder, CO 4.5 5.8 5.2 5.0 4.2 4.8
207 Chattanooga, TN-GA 2.9 3.6 3.9 5.1 3.3 4.8
208 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 1.9 2.5 3.9 6.2 3.9 4.8
209 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.3 3.8 4.7
210 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 5.0 5.9 6.5 6.4 4.2 4.7
211 Elmira, NY 22.6 5.5 5.5 5.7 4.7 4.7
212 Salinas, CA 3.0 3.3 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.7
213 Duluth, MN-WI 4.3 4.5 6.8 8.8 3.4 4.7
214 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.5 4.5 4.7
215 Fargo, ND-MN 3.6 3.7 5.0 6.5 4.4 4.7
216 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.5 3.8 4.6
217 Macon, GA 5.9 2.2 2.3 3.2 3.4 4.5
218 Lakeland, FL 2.5 2.4 3.4 4.2 3.9 4.5
219 Stockton, CA 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.4
220 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 2.7 3.6 4.1 4.4 3.2 4.4
221 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 4.7 5.0 5.7 5.8 4.7 4.4
222 New Haven-Milford, CT 5.2 4.2 4.7 5.3 4.0 4.4
223 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 3.8 3.3 4.2 5.1 4.1 4.3
224 Wausau, WI 4.1 3.9 5.2 4.4 3.7 4.3
225 Huntsville, AL 6.7 7.1 5.7 5.6 5.7 4.2

IHS Global Insight 52


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
226 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ n/a 0.8 0.9 1.1 3.9 4.2
227 Spokane, WA 3.8 4.2 5.0 5.1 3.7 4.2
228 Muncie, IN 4.1 3.6 4.4 3.8 2.7 4.2
229 Danville, VA 6.4 4.1 3.5 4.1 3.5 4.2
230 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.8 4.1
231 Iowa City, IA 4.2 3.2 3.0 3.3 3.6 4.1
232 Springfield, MA 3.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.1
233 Pocatello, ID 6.2 6.7 5.8 6.1 4.2 4.0
234 Lynchburg, VA 4.3 4.9 4.6 4.6 4.2 3.9
235 Olympia, WA 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.7 3.9
236 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 2.2 2.7 2.8 4.1 3.5 3.9
237 Green Bay, WI 2.9 3.1 3.9 4.3 3.3 3.9
238 San Angelo, TX 0.3 0.3 3.4 3.8 4.7 3.9
239 Fort Smith, AR-OK 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.3 3.9
240 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.2 3.0 3.8
241 Odessa, TX 1.5 3.7 3.3 2.6 3.5 3.8
242 Flint, MI 9.9 9.4 9.0 7.1 3.2 3.8
243 Yuma, AZ 4.9 6.4 5.4 5.2 4.0 3.7
244 Columbus, OH 4.7 3.8 3.9 4.3 3.2 3.6
245 Grand Forks, ND-MN 4.8 6.4 6.4 6.6 4.6 3.6
246 Salem, OR 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.6 3.6
247 Columbia, MO 2.3 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.5
248 Baltimore-Towson, MD 4.1 3.8 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.5
249 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.3 2.9 3.5
250 Albany, GA 3.4 5.9 3.4 1.8 1.9 3.5
251 Raleigh-Cary, NC 2.3 3.8 4.1 3.9 3.3 3.4
252 Eugene-Springfield, OR 7.5 7.4 7.8 6.5 2.8 3.4
253 Waco, TX 2.0 2.7 2.5 3.4 2.8 3.4
254 Athens-Clarke County, GA 4.1 2.7 3.0 2.7 3.5 3.4
255 Columbus, GA-AL 3.9 4.7 5.8 5.1 3.4 3.3
256 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 3.1 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.3
257 Dothan, AL 2.9 2.6 1.8 2.7 4.0 3.3
258 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.2
259 Denver-Aurora, CO 2.2 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.2
260 Valdosta, GA 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.8 2.4 3.2
261 Jacksonville, FL 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.3 2.8 3.2
262 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 4.2 4.5 3.9 4.9 3.1 3.1
263 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.5 3.1
264 Joplin, MO 3.1 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.0 3.0
265 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 1.6 1.8 2.5 3.1 2.8 3.0
266 State College, PA 2.8 3.7 4.9 4.9 2.8 3.0
267 Flagstaff, AZ 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.9 2.9
268 Great Falls, MT 1.1 1.4 1.7 3.1 2.4 2.9
269 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 1.6 1.5 1.3 2.6 2.8 2.9
270 Charlottesville, VA 2.3 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.8

IHS Global Insight 53


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
271 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 2.9 2.7 3.1 4.1 2.5 2.8
272 St. Cloud, MN 1.5 2.7 4.2 3.9 2.6 2.8
273 Johnstown, PA 1.7 2.1 1.5 2.5 2.3 2.8
274 Jefferson City, MO 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.9 3.1 2.7
275 Chico, CA 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7
276 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 1.7 1.9 2.3 3.2 2.9 2.7
277 Elizabethtown, KY 6.0 5.5 5.4 4.0 2.3 2.7
278 Lafayette, LA 3.2 3.6 3.7 4.5 4.1 2.7
279 Naples-Marco Island, FL 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.7
280 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6
281 Pueblo, CO 5.1 4.8 5.0 3.2 2.9 2.6
282 Goldsboro, NC 2.5 3.6 4.2 3.9 3.5 2.6
283 Napa, CA 1.8 2.7 2.8 3.1 2.3 2.6
284 Port St. Lucie, FL 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.6
285 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.5 5.2 2.5
286 Dubuque, IA 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.8 3.1 2.5
287 Wichita Falls, TX 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.1 2.9 2.5
288 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.5
289 Palm Coast, FL n/a 1.8 3.4 3.7 3.1 2.4
290 Ocala, FL 2.0 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.4
291 Springfield, MO 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.1 2.3
292 Lawrence, KS 1.8 1.9 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.3
293 St. George, UT 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 2.3
294 Sumter, SC 3.2 3.1 3.4 3.0 2.2 2.3
295 Bloomington-Normal, IL 1.6 2.3 4.1 4.0 1.6 2.3
296 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 2.3 2.6 2.2 2.3 1.6 2.3
297 Clarksville, TN-KY 3.8 3.7 3.4 3.2 1.6 2.3
298 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.1 2.3
299 Jackson, MS 4.4 4.4 2.6 2.8 1.8 2.2
300 Gainesville, FL 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 2.3 2.2
301 Kingston, NY 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.8 2.1
302 Amarillo, TX 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.9 1.5 2.1
303 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 1.9 2.7 3.0 2.2 1.3 2.1
304 Monroe, LA 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.3 2.1
305 Tyler, TX 2.5 2.7 2.3 1.7 1.6 2.0
306 Owensboro, KY 4.5 4.3 3.0 3.1 2.4 2.0
307 Johnson City, TN 1.5 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.4 1.9
308 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.9 2.1 1.9
309 Oklahoma City, OK 2.1 1.7 1.5 2.1 1.8 1.9
310 Bangor, ME 2.5 4.1 3.0 2.2 2.1 1.9
311 Sioux Falls, SD 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.8
312 Jonesboro, AR 2.7 1.3 1.5 2.2 2.0 1.8
313 Norwich-New London, CT 1.8 1.9 3.6 3.7 1.9 1.8
314 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.8
315 Rome, GA 7.0 4.2 4.4 4.7 2.5 1.7

IHS Global Insight 54


Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*


%
316 Medford, OR 1.9 2.7 2.3 1.5 1.8 1.7
317 Bend, OR 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.7
318 Grand Junction, CO 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7
319 Lewiston, ID-WA 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.8 1.4 1.6
320 Hot Springs, AR 0.9 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.6
321 Fayetteville, NC 3.9 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.5
322 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.5
323 Albuquerque, NM 5.9 6.5 2.8 1.4 1.0 1.4
324 Springfield, IL 0.8 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.4
325 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 1.6 4.1 3.6 4.6 2.5 1.4
326 Barnstable Town, MA 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.4 1.3
327 Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 2.0 1.8 2.9 6.0 2.1 1.3
328 Redding, CA 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3
329 Prescott, AZ 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.3
330 Alexandria, LA 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.3
331 Billings, MT 1.1 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.2
332 Anderson, IN 2.6 3.2 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.1
333 Casper, WY 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.0
334 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.0 1.0
335 Warner Robins, GA 1.5 0.9 0.6 3.2 1.6 1.0
336 Cumberland, MD-WV 1.6 1.5 1.4 0.7 0.8 1.0
337 Honolulu, HI 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.0
338 Tallahassee, FL 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.9
339 Morgantown, WV 1.5 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.3 0.9
340 Punta Gorda, FL 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9
341 College Station-Bryan, TX 1.3 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8
342 Dover, DE 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.8
343 Wheeling, WV-OH 0.3 4.6 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.8
344 Ocean City, NJ 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.8
345 Abilene, TX 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.8
346 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 0.7 0.7 1.1 2.8 1.1 0.8
347 Gadsden, AL 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7
348 Midland, TX 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.7
349 Bismarck, ND 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.7
350 Missoula, MT 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.6
351 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6
352 Atlantic City, NJ 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5
353 Rapid City, SD 2.4 3.4 2.8 2.0 0.6 0.5
354 Cheyenne, WY 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4
355 Anchorage, AK 0.7 1.6 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.3
356 Santa Fe, NM 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3
357 Farmington, NM 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3
*Export data through the first half of 2010

IHS Global Insight 55


Table 7: Largest Ports by US Customs District
Year-to-Date 2011Q3, Mil, $
Rank Imports Exports Total

1 New York City, NY 121,460 169,067 290,526


2 Los Angeles, CA 90,533 196,557 287,090
3 Houston-Galveston, TX 87,136 111,235 198,371
4 Detroit, MI 92,329 89,448 181,778
5 New Orleans, LA 60,997 113,326 174,323
6 Laredo, TX 70,650 89,791 160,441
7 Chicago, IL 27,123 102,692 129,814
8 Savannah, GA 36,739 56,996 93,735
9 Seattle, WA 50,271 42,943 93,214
10 San Francisco, CA 37,074 52,226 89,300
11 Miami, FL 50,822 31,931 82,753
12 Cleveland, OH 21,946 58,087 80,033
13 Buffalo, NY 35,180 31,475 66,655
14 Philadelphia, PA 12,871 51,120 63,991
15 El Paso, TX 25,837 35,054 60,891
16 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 13,484 33,541 47,025
17 Charleston, SC 16,841 27,206 44,048
18 Baltimore, MD 15,051 23,662 38,713
19 San Diego, CA 13,698 24,853 38,551
20 Great Falls, MT 16,185 21,974 38,159
21 Ogdensburg, NY 14,143 22,882 37,025
22 Norfolk, VA 17,929 18,660 36,589
23 Port Arthur, TX 7,449 25,063 32,512
24 Pembina, ND 18,865 11,817 30,682
25 Mobile, AL 8,518 19,847 28,365
26 Tampa, FL 12,618 14,010 26,628
27 Anchorage, AK 11,531 11,431 22,962
28 Boston, MA 6,152 16,012 22,164
29 Nogales, AZ 7,871 13,730 21,601
30 Columbia-Snake, OR 10,880 9,181 20,061
31 Wilmington, NC 4,148 11,170 15,318
32 Minneapolis, MN 1,920 12,373 14,293
33 St. Louis, MO 496 13,387 13,883
34 Washington, DC 3,953 6,824 10,778
35 Honolulu, HI 5,561 4,196 9,757

IHS Global Insight 56


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

1 Danville, VA 86,259 94,056 9.0 7,797


2 Elmira, NY 98,715 105,589 7.0 6,874
3 Joplin, MO 83,516 88,797 6.3 5,281
4 Bismarck, ND 143,011 150,332 5.1 7,321
5 Casper, WY 148,160 155,123 4.7 6,963
6 Gadsden, AL 85,028 88,886 4.5 3,858
7 Lewiston, ID-WA 149,344 155,459 4.1 6,115
8 Jefferson City, MO 107,598 111,941 4.0 4,343
9 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 78,544 81,712 4.0 3,168
10 Midland, TX 128,875 134,066 4.0 5,191
11 Cheyenne, WY 150,224 155,734 3.7 5,510
12 Dubuque, IA 121,821 126,114 3.5 4,293
13 Grand Forks, ND-MN 126,111 130,451 3.4 4,339
14 Pittsburgh, PA 115,776 119,751 3.4 3,975
15 Columbia, MO 119,258 123,320 3.4 4,061
16 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 79,838 82,453 3.3 2,615
17 Morristown, TN 98,443 101,614 3.2 3,171
18 Sherman-Denison, TX 84,906 87,617 3.2 2,712
19 Idaho Falls, ID 114,287 117,852 3.1 3,565
20 Lincoln, NE 118,846 122,414 3.0 3,568
21 Tyler, TX 106,023 109,129 2.9 3,106
22 St. Joseph, MO-KS 89,301 91,800 2.8 2,500
23 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 59,612 61,252 2.8 1,641
24 Hot Springs, AR 108,586 111,382 2.6 2,796
25 Utica-Rome, NY 120,032 122,887 2.4 2,855
26 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 102,590 104,943 2.3 2,354
27 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 115,619 118,213 2.2 2,594
28 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 211,028 215,723 2.2 4,696
29 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 104,448 106,761 2.2 2,313
30 Wichita Falls, TX 79,682 81,369 2.1 1,687
31 Cleveland, TN 106,377 108,497 2.0 2,120
32 Williamsport, PA 131,513 134,098 2.0 2,585
33 College Station-Bryan, TX 114,522 116,748 1.9 2,226
34 Billings, MT 156,697 159,726 1.9 3,028
35 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 126,706 129,053 1.9 2,347
36 Springfield, IL 106,581 108,460 1.8 1,880
37 Erie, PA 109,780 111,690 1.7 1,911
38 Missoula, MT 215,132 218,657 1.6 3,525
39 Rochester, NY 123,443 125,416 1.6 1,972
40 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 105,458 107,097 1.6 1,639
41 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 93,631 95,068 1.5 1,436
42 Sioux Falls, SD 122,997 124,840 1.5 1,843
43 Jonesboro, AR 76,588 77,733 1.5 1,145
44 Rapid City, SD 122,084 123,821 1.4 1,737

IHS Global Insight 57


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


45 Owensboro, KY 89,955 91,204 1.4 1,249
46 Tuscaloosa, AL 111,228 112,733 1.4 1,505
47 Odessa, TX 76,447 77,464 1.3 1,017
48 Great Falls, MT 132,254 133,995 1.3 1,741
49 Fargo, ND-MN 142,167 144,033 1.3 1,866
50 Amarillo, TX 95,076 96,221 1.2 1,145
51 Wheeling, WV-OH 89,579 90,630 1.2 1,051
52 Ithaca, NY 165,363 167,252 1.1 1,889
53 Anchorage, AK 236,237 238,898 1.1 2,661
54 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 94,691 95,756 1.1 1,064
55 Abilene, TX 81,109 82,017 1.1 908
56 Syracuse, NY 122,603 123,935 1.1 1,332
57 Clarksville, TN-KY 104,700 105,827 1.1 1,127
58 Fairbanks, AK 195,342 197,356 1.0 2,014
59 Iowa City, IA 146,375 147,834 1.0 1,459
60 Cedar Rapids, IA 111,951 113,032 1.0 1,081
61 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 214,609 216,604 0.9 1,995
62 Fort Smith, AR-OK 81,205 81,944 0.9 739
63 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 92,703 93,504 0.9 801
64 Jackson, MS 98,096 98,865 0.8 769
65 Sandusky, OH 111,593 112,402 0.7 809
66 Warner Robins, GA 87,794 88,403 0.7 609
67 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 109,220 109,977 0.7 757
68 Charleston, WV 92,759 93,381 0.7 622
69 Glens Falls, NY 169,297 170,330 0.6 1,033
70 Boulder, CO 306,608 308,427 0.6 1,820
71 Victoria, TX 91,240 91,765 0.6 526
72 State College, PA 172,417 173,364 0.5 947
73 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 197,229 198,299 0.5 1,070
74 Harrisonburg, VA 166,495 167,332 0.5 837
75 Columbus, IN 116,652 117,216 0.5 564
76 Bloomington-Normal, IL 129,695 130,270 0.4 574
77 Elizabethtown, KY 118,326 118,828 0.4 502
78 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 91,259 91,641 0.4 381
79 Longview, TX 98,349 98,705 0.4 356
80 Lake Charles, LA 99,163 99,515 0.4 352
81 Evansville, IN-KY 94,163 94,487 0.3 324
82 San Angelo, TX 95,580 95,890 0.3 310
83 Springfield, MO 104,157 104,414 0.2 257
84 Waco, TX 94,930 95,145 0.2 215
85 Champaign-Urbana, IL 118,188 118,358 0.1 170
86 Ames, IA 133,704 133,855 0.1 151
87 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 109,198 109,320 0.1 121
88 Bloomington, IN 123,940 124,077 0.1 136

IHS Global Insight 58


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


89 Baton Rouge, LA 127,010 127,149 0.1 139
90 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 122,660 122,770 0.1 110
91 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 107,404 107,457 0.0 53
92 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 172,246 172,298 0.0 52
93 Roanoke, VA 147,047 147,018 0.0 -29
94 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA 153,390 153,341 0.0 -49
95 Corpus Christi, TX 94,220 94,083 -0.1 -137
96 Mansfield, OH 88,556 88,425 -0.1 -131
97 Huntsville, AL 124,028 123,814 -0.2 -214
98 Lubbock, TX 87,349 87,175 -0.2 -174
99 Kansas City, MO-KS 119,752 119,496 -0.2 -257
100 Pocatello, ID 110,533 110,288 -0.2 -246
101 Lima, OH 94,065 93,814 -0.3 -251
102 Lynchburg, VA 139,589 139,157 -0.3 -432
103 Peoria, IL 112,412 112,059 -0.3 -353
104 Altoona, PA 104,526 104,194 -0.3 -332
105 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 97,930 97,604 -0.3 -326
106 Jackson, TN 86,365 86,060 -0.4 -305
107 Morgantown, WV 124,179 123,636 -0.4 -542
108 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 110,361 109,825 -0.5 -536
109 Palm Coast, FL 132,527 131,870 -0.5 -658
110 Decatur, IL 84,249 83,829 -0.5 -420
111 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 104,614 104,068 -0.5 -546
112 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 87,150 86,694 -0.5 -456
113 Bowling Green, KY 111,414 110,805 -0.5 -609
114 St. Louis, MO-IL 122,977 122,275 -0.6 -702
115 Laredo, TX 89,688 89,155 -0.6 -532
116 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 123,422 122,616 -0.7 -806
117 Rochester, MN 131,047 130,145 -0.7 -902
118 Knoxville, TN 126,545 125,582 -0.8 -962
119 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 157,317 156,058 -0.8 -1,259
120 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 134,592 133,512 -0.8 -1,080
121 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 110,433 109,534 -0.8 -899
122 Alexandria, LA 92,254 91,495 -0.8 -759
123 Ann Arbor, MI 152,083 150,806 -0.8 -1,277
124 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 161,372 159,912 -0.9 -1,460
125 Tallahassee, FL 123,311 122,153 -0.9 -1,158
126 Fayetteville, NC 112,097 110,902 -1.1 -1,195
127 Duluth, MN-WI 115,962 114,710 -1.1 -1,252
128 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 115,281 114,011 -1.1 -1,270
129 Columbus, OH 131,667 130,190 -1.1 -1,477
130 Danville, IL 67,973 67,204 -1.1 -769
131 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 82,520 81,581 -1.1 -939
132 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 96,584 95,450 -1.2 -1,134

IHS Global Insight 59


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


133 Decatur, AL 93,820 92,703 -1.2 -1,117
134 Lebanon, PA 146,511 144,764 -1.2 -1,747
135 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 102,038 100,812 -1.2 -1,226
136 Lafayette, IN 111,034 109,618 -1.3 -1,416
137 Hattiesburg, MS 88,778 87,639 -1.3 -1,139
138 Anniston-Oxford, AL 80,954 79,902 -1.3 -1,052
139 Binghamton, NY 123,826 122,214 -1.3 -1,612
140 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 122,897 121,270 -1.3 -1,627
141 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 95,929 94,599 -1.4 -1,330
142 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 124,834 123,094 -1.4 -1,740
143 Honolulu, HI 597,884 589,279 -1.4 -8,605
144 Corvallis, OR 240,928 237,342 -1.5 -3,586
145 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 220,356 217,060 -1.5 -3,297
146 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 226,820 223,372 -1.5 -3,448
147 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 63,487 62,492 -1.6 -995
148 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 125,437 123,434 -1.6 -2,003
149 Fort Wayne, IN 94,580 92,994 -1.7 -1,586
150 Chattanooga, TN-GA 113,020 111,108 -1.7 -1,913
151 Colorado Springs, CO 189,635 186,360 -1.7 -3,275
152 Monroe, LA 96,672 94,944 -1.8 -1,728
153 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 330,556 324,585 -1.8 -5,971
154 Springfield, OH 95,065 93,345 -1.8 -1,719
155 Bay City, MI 80,796 79,327 -1.8 -1,469
156 Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL 120,286 118,048 -1.9 -2,237
157 Pine Bluff, AR 68,702 67,348 -2.0 -1,354
158 Battle Creek, MI 81,308 79,683 -2.0 -1,625
159 Toledo, OH 95,826 93,860 -2.1 -1,966
160 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 109,908 107,651 -2.1 -2,258
161 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 124,076 121,504 -2.1 -2,572
162 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 103,209 101,062 -2.1 -2,148
163 Macon, GA 82,523 80,793 -2.1 -1,730
164 Auburn-Opelika, AL 109,023 106,691 -2.1 -2,332
165 Johnstown, PA 95,846 93,794 -2.1 -2,052
166 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 107,275 104,933 -2.2 -2,342
167 Canton-Massillon, OH 100,695 98,479 -2.2 -2,216
168 La Crosse, WI-MN 130,180 127,250 -2.3 -2,930
169 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 103,548 101,165 -2.3 -2,382
170 Johnson City, TN 112,667 110,065 -2.3 -2,602
171 Akron, OH 113,147 110,509 -2.3 -2,639
172 Yakima, WA 150,044 146,517 -2.4 -3,527
173 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 205,856 200,980 -2.4 -4,876
174 Dayton, OH 105,438 102,939 -2.4 -2,499
175 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 127,867 124,810 -2.4 -3,057
176 Rocky Mount, NC 86,471 84,389 -2.4 -2,082

IHS Global Insight 60


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


177 Lexington-Fayette, KY 139,387 136,011 -2.4 -3,376
178 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 141,675 138,234 -2.4 -3,441
179 Charlottesville, VA 225,275 219,770 -2.4 -5,506
180 Montgomery, AL 97,086 94,687 -2.5 -2,398
181 Logan, UT-ID 163,519 159,345 -2.6 -4,175
182 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 138,961 135,392 -2.6 -3,569
183 New Haven-Milford, CT 226,182 220,371 -2.6 -5,811
184 Lafayette, LA 125,788 122,546 -2.6 -3,242
185 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 121,023 117,886 -2.6 -3,137
186 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 393,194 382,276 -2.8 -10,918
187 Albany, GA 77,190 75,033 -2.8 -2,157
188 Winchester, VA-WV 145,447 141,372 -2.8 -4,076
189 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 126,521 122,968 -2.8 -3,553
190 Lancaster, PA 183,204 177,825 -2.9 -5,379
191 Terre Haute, IN 79,952 77,517 -3.0 -2,434
192 Topeka, KS 103,889 100,707 -3.1 -3,182
193 Greeley, CO 154,784 150,033 -3.1 -4,750
194 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 314,219 304,316 -3.2 -9,903
195 Springfield, MA 199,200 192,883 -3.2 -6,317
196 Eau Claire, WI 120,881 117,013 -3.2 -3,869
197 Fond du Lac, WI 130,149 125,952 -3.2 -4,197
198 Goldsboro, NC 101,900 98,590 -3.2 -3,310
199 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 168,755 163,183 -3.3 -5,573
200 El Paso, TX 103,123 99,709 -3.3 -3,414
201 Bend, OR 171,685 165,942 -3.3 -5,743
202 Madison, WI 190,817 184,396 -3.4 -6,421
203 Athens-Clarke County, GA 112,162 108,379 -3.4 -3,782
204 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 494,595 477,890 -3.4 -16,705
205 Pittsfield, MA 199,656 192,893 -3.4 -6,763
206 Norwich-New London, CT 216,900 209,484 -3.4 -7,416
207 Winston-Salem, NC 123,908 119,580 -3.5 -4,329
208 Savannah, GA 114,032 110,041 -3.5 -3,992
209 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 77,472 74,717 -3.6 -2,755
210 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 126,129 121,627 -3.6 -4,503
211 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 96,244 92,808 -3.6 -3,436
212 Greenville, NC 97,049 93,503 -3.7 -3,546
213 Oklahoma City, OK 104,742 100,901 -3.7 -3,841
214 Wichita, KS 102,016 98,253 -3.7 -3,763
215 St. Cloud, MN 134,009 129,050 -3.7 -4,959
216 Eugene-Springfield, OR 192,655 185,455 -3.7 -7,201
217 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 128,819 123,920 -3.8 -4,899
218 Burlington, NC 109,283 105,120 -3.8 -4,163
219 Baltimore-Towson, MD 235,192 226,176 -3.8 -9,016
220 Raleigh-Cary, NC 178,252 171,357 -3.9 -6,896

IHS Global Insight 61


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


221 Anderson, IN 84,252 80,992 -3.9 -3,261
222 Mobile, AL 97,874 94,063 -3.9 -3,811
223 Richmond, VA 168,392 161,795 -3.9 -6,598
224 Cumberland, MD-WV 115,998 111,443 -3.9 -4,554
225 Pueblo, CO 118,048 113,391 -3.9 -4,657
226 Columbus, GA-AL 96,740 92,912 -4.0 -3,829
227 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 100,013 96,018 -4.0 -3,995
228 Dothan, AL 87,117 83,566 -4.1 -3,551
229 Barnstable Town, MA 302,966 290,426 -4.1 -12,541
230 Tulsa, OK 104,195 99,867 -4.2 -4,328
231 Wausau, WI 125,156 119,951 -4.2 -5,205
232 Reading, PA 165,048 158,158 -4.2 -6,890
233 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 236,820 226,847 -4.2 -9,973
234 Kokomo, IN 81,920 78,432 -4.3 -3,488
235 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 120,075 114,926 -4.3 -5,149
236 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 134,472 128,693 -4.3 -5,779
237 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 120,148 114,903 -4.4 -5,245
238 Green Bay, WI 129,862 124,191 -4.4 -5,671
239 Sumter, SC 90,372 86,425 -4.4 -3,947
240 Brunswick, GA 98,134 93,842 -4.4 -4,292
241 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 197,859 189,143 -4.4 -8,716
242 Appleton, WI 130,474 124,707 -4.4 -5,767
243 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 167,315 159,861 -4.5 -7,454
244 Pascagoula, MS 95,353 91,097 -4.5 -4,256
245 Jacksonville, FL 126,509 120,761 -4.5 -5,748
246 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 176,543 168,400 -4.6 -8,143
247 Santa Fe, NM 252,144 240,474 -4.6 -11,670
248 Monroe, MI 107,180 102,219 -4.6 -4,961
249 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 84,277 80,360 -4.6 -3,917
250 York-Hanover, PA 166,371 158,473 -4.7 -7,898
251 Rockford, IL 114,417 108,955 -4.8 -5,462
252 Flint, MI 68,702 65,413 -4.8 -3,289
253 Lawton, OK 105,576 100,512 -4.8 -5,064
254 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 112,689 107,235 -4.8 -5,454
255 Sheboygan, WI 130,759 124,426 -4.8 -6,332
256 Valdosta, GA 88,045 83,720 -4.9 -4,326
257 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 401,293 381,391 -5.0 -19,902
258 Farmington, NM 125,312 119,097 -5.0 -6,215
259 Jackson, MI 86,714 82,370 -5.0 -4,344
260 Las Cruces, NM 110,822 105,180 -5.1 -5,642
261 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 380,632 361,243 -5.1 -19,389
262 Worcester, MA 209,789 199,075 -5.1 -10,713
263 Florence, SC 83,084 78,815 -5.1 -4,269
264 Albuquerque, NM 170,095 161,157 -5.3 -8,938

IHS Global Insight 62


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


265 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 111,601 105,737 -5.3 -5,864
266 Kingston, NY 208,533 197,551 -5.3 -10,982
267 Dalton, GA 81,261 76,981 -5.3 -4,280
268 Columbia, SC 112,652 106,682 -5.3 -5,971
269 Coeur d`Alene, ID 154,052 145,745 -5.4 -8,307
270 Greensboro-High Point, NC 119,196 112,738 -5.4 -6,457
271 Manchester-Nashua, NH 198,860 188,063 -5.4 -10,797
272 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 113,478 107,136 -5.6 -6,343
273 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 248,946 234,859 -5.7 -14,087
274 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 428,865 404,392 -5.7 -24,474
275 Rome, GA 86,103 81,176 -5.7 -4,927
276 Bangor, ME 129,281 121,840 -5.8 -7,440
277 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 107,666 101,464 -5.8 -6,203
278 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 216,955 204,411 -5.8 -12,544
279 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 253,990 239,294 -5.8 -14,696
280 Bellingham, WA 263,029 247,655 -5.8 -15,374
281 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 86,775 81,597 -6.0 -5,177
282 St. George, UT 155,919 146,604 -6.0 -9,316
283 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 157,517 147,980 -6.1 -9,537
284 Gainesville, FL 126,431 118,711 -6.1 -7,720
285 Flagstaff, AZ 176,986 166,168 -6.1 -10,818
286 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 172,524 161,975 -6.1 -10,548
287 Salt Lake City, UT 210,185 197,253 -6.2 -12,932
288 Janesville, WI 116,563 109,316 -6.2 -7,247
289 Lawrence, KS 151,041 141,521 -6.3 -9,520
290 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 189,109 177,149 -6.3 -11,960
291 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA 224,209 209,800 -6.4 -14,409
292 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 105,282 98,483 -6.5 -6,799
293 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 230,769 215,844 -6.5 -14,925
294 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 148,036 138,398 -6.5 -9,639
295 Provo-Orem, UT 185,640 173,297 -6.6 -12,342
296 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 98,134 91,547 -6.7 -6,587
297 Muncie, IN 77,174 71,968 -6.7 -5,206
298 Racine, WI 139,714 130,207 -6.8 -9,507
299 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 77,455 72,122 -6.9 -5,333
300 Spartanburg, SC 94,394 87,713 -7.1 -6,681
301 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 122,272 113,532 -7.1 -8,739
302 Prescott, AZ 134,982 125,284 -7.2 -9,698
303 Spokane, WA 174,261 161,606 -7.3 -12,656
304 Salem, OR 175,286 162,515 -7.3 -12,771
305 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 345,739 320,449 -7.3 -25,290
306 Asheville, NC 159,001 147,230 -7.4 -11,770
307 Jacksonville, NC 123,490 114,261 -7.5 -9,229
308 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 294,099 272,050 -7.5 -22,048

IHS Global Insight 63


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


309 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 225,855 208,782 -7.6 -17,072
310 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 425,927 393,415 -7.6 -32,512
311 Punta Gorda, FL 106,713 98,566 -7.6 -8,147
312 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 107,269 99,017 -7.7 -8,252
313 Port St. Lucie, FL 111,084 102,355 -7.9 -8,729
314 Naples-Marco Island, FL 188,781 173,883 -7.9 -14,898
315 Longview, WA 169,529 155,935 -8.0 -13,594
316 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 232,457 213,805 -8.0 -18,652
317 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 123,523 113,600 -8.0 -9,923
318 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 109,252 100,459 -8.0 -8,792
319 Olympia, WA 217,589 200,023 -8.1 -17,566
320 Gainesville, GA 109,676 100,540 -8.3 -9,136
321 Yuma, AZ 89,278 81,759 -8.4 -7,520
322 Anderson, SC 99,079 90,732 -8.4 -8,346
323 Tucson, AZ 127,449 116,569 -8.5 -10,881
324 Ocean City, NJ 287,157 262,474 -8.6 -24,683
325 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 113,259 103,485 -8.6 -9,773
326 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 193,325 176,255 -8.8 -17,070
327 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 306,630 277,660 -9.4 -28,971
328 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 146,082 132,025 -9.6 -14,058
329 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 155,633 140,653 -9.6 -14,979
330 El Centro, CA 96,355 86,952 -9.8 -9,402
331 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 155,417 140,191 -9.8 -15,227
332 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 337,094 304,045 -9.8 -33,049
333 Grand Junction, CO 183,400 165,295 -9.9 -18,105
334 Wilmington, NC 164,130 147,650 -10.0 -16,480
335 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 305,966 274,233 -10.4 -31,733
336 Medford, OR 177,949 159,372 -10.4 -18,577
337 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 358,900 320,328 -10.7 -38,572
338 Chico, CA 169,737 151,473 -10.8 -18,264
339 Napa, CA 303,756 271,059 -10.8 -32,697
340 Boise City-Nampa, ID 125,439 111,559 -11.1 -13,880
341 Redding, CA 153,911 136,754 -11.1 -17,157
342 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 176,486 156,398 -11.4 -20,088
343 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 104,548 92,442 -11.6 -12,106
344 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 131,652 116,367 -11.6 -15,285
345 Ocala, FL 87,588 77,276 -11.8 -10,312
346 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 240,903 212,259 -11.9 -28,644
347 Visalia-Porterville, CA 117,412 103,301 -12.0 -14,111
348 Salisbury, MD 146,435 128,289 -12.4 -18,146
349 Reno-Sparks, NV 152,746 133,709 -12.5 -19,037
350 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 196,029 170,886 -12.8 -25,142
351 Salinas, CA 284,886 248,043 -12.9 -36,843
352 Fresno, CA 135,990 117,941 -13.3 -18,049

IHS Global Insight 64


Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


353 Bakersfield-Delano, CA 112,279 97,230 -13.4 -15,050
354 Carson City, NV 155,798 134,502 -13.7 -21,297
355 Dover, DE 158,443 136,598 -13.8 -21,845
356 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 181,513 154,914 -14.7 -26,600
357 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 118,239 100,770 -14.8 -17,468
358 Stockton, CA 137,904 116,602 -15.4 -21,302
359 Modesto, CA 125,609 106,197 -15.5 -19,412
360 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 124,688 104,920 -15.9 -19,768
361 Madera-Chowchilla, CA 145,562 120,876 -17.0 -24,686
362 Yuba City, CA 129,906 104,614 -19.5 -25,292
363 Merced, CA 101,076 81,379 -19.5 -19,696

IHS Global Insight 65


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

1 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 401,293 381,391 -5.0 -19,902
2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 380,632 361,243 -5.1 -19,389
3 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 193,325 176,255 -8.8 -17,070
4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 123,422 122,616 -0.7 -806
5 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 126,129 121,627 -3.6 -4,503
6 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 216,955 204,411 -5.8 -12,544
7 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 330,556 324,585 -1.8 -5,971
8 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 157,517 147,980 -6.1 -9,537
9 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 128,819 123,920 -3.8 -4,899
10 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 314,219 304,316 -3.2 -9,903
11 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 428,865 404,392 -5.7 -24,474
12 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 176,486 156,398 -11.4 -20,088
13 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 94,691 95,756 1.1 1,064
14 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 123,523 113,600 -8.0 -9,923
15 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 294,099 272,050 -7.5 -22,048
16 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 167,315 159,861 -4.5 -7,454
17 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 345,739 320,449 -7.3 -25,290
18 St. Louis, MO-IL 122,977 122,275 -0.6 -702
19 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 111,601 105,737 -5.3 -5,864
20 Baltimore-Towson, MD 235,192 226,176 -3.8 -9,016
21 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 226,820 223,372 -1.5 -3,448
22 Pittsburgh, PA 115,776 119,751 3.4 3,975
23 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 236,820 226,847 -4.2 -9,973
24 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 110,361 109,825 -0.5 -536
25 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 196,029 170,886 -12.8 -25,142
26 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 122,272 113,532 -7.1 -8,739
27 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 124,834 123,094 -1.4 -1,740
28 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 120,148 114,903 -4.4 -5,245
29 Kansas City, MO-KS 119,752 119,496 -0.2 -257
30 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 118,239 100,770 -14.8 -17,468
31 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 494,595 477,890 -3.4 -16,705
32 Columbus, OH 131,667 130,190 -1.1 -1,477
33 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 148,036 138,398 -6.5 -9,639
34 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 127,867 124,810 -2.4 -3,057
35 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 172,246 172,298 0.0 52
36 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 197,859 189,143 -4.4 -8,716
37 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 157,317 156,058 -0.8 -1,259
38 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 232,457 213,805 -8.0 -18,652
39 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 172,524 161,975 -6.1 -10,548
40 Jacksonville, FL 126,509 120,761 -4.5 -5,748
41 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 96,584 95,450 -1.2 -1,134
42 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 126,521 122,968 -2.8 -3,553
43 Oklahoma City, OK 104,742 100,901 -3.7 -3,841
44 Richmond, VA 168,392 161,795 -3.9 -6,598

IHS Global Insight 66


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


45 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 220,356 217,060 -1.5 -3,297
46 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 141,675 138,234 -2.4 -3,441
47 Raleigh-Cary, NC 178,252 171,357 -3.9 -6,896
48 Salt Lake City, UT 210,185 197,253 -6.2 -12,932
49 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 126,706 129,053 1.9 2,347
50 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 109,908 107,651 -2.1 -2,258
51 Rochester, NY 123,443 125,416 1.6 1,972
52 Tucson, AZ 127,449 116,569 -8.5 -10,881
53 Honolulu, HI 597,884 589,279 -1.4 -8,605
54 Tulsa, OK 104,195 99,867 -4.2 -4,328
55 Fresno, CA 135,990 117,941 -13.3 -18,049
56 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 393,194 382,276 -2.8 -10,918
57 Albuquerque, NM 170,095 161,157 -5.3 -8,938
58 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 115,619 118,213 2.2 2,594
59 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 197,229 198,299 0.5 1,070
60 New Haven-Milford, CT 226,182 220,371 -2.6 -5,811
61 Bakersfield-Delano, CA 112,279 97,230 -13.4 -15,050
62 Dayton, OH 105,438 102,939 -2.4 -2,499
63 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 337,094 304,045 -9.8 -33,049
64 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 189,109 177,149 -6.3 -11,960
65 El Paso, TX 103,123 99,709 -3.3 -3,414
66 Baton Rouge, LA 127,010 127,149 0.1 139
67 Worcester, MA 209,789 199,075 -5.1 -10,713
68 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 59,612 61,252 2.8 1,641
69 Columbia, SC 112,652 106,682 -5.3 -5,971
70 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 102,038 100,812 -1.2 -1,226
71 Greensboro-High Point, NC 119,196 112,738 -5.4 -6,457
72 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 102,590 104,943 2.3 2,354
73 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 124,076 121,504 -2.1 -2,572
74 Akron, OH 113,147 110,509 -2.3 -2,639
75 Knoxville, TN 126,545 125,582 -0.8 -962
76 Springfield, MA 199,200 192,883 -3.2 -6,317
77 Stockton, CA 137,904 116,602 -15.4 -21,302
78 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 146,082 132,025 -9.6 -14,058
79 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 248,946 234,859 -5.7 -14,087
80 Syracuse, NY 122,603 123,935 1.1 1,332
81 Colorado Springs, CO 189,635 186,360 -1.7 -3,275
82 Toledo, OH 95,826 93,860 -2.1 -1,966
83 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 113,478 107,136 -5.6 -6,343
84 Wichita, KS 102,016 98,253 -3.7 -3,763
85 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 113,259 103,485 -8.6 -9,773
86 Boise City-Nampa, ID 125,439 111,559 -11.1 -13,880
87 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 84,277 80,360 -4.6 -3,917
88 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 122,660 122,770 0.1 110

IHS Global Insight 67


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


89 Madison, WI 190,817 184,396 -3.4 -6,421
90 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 134,592 133,512 -0.8 -1,080
91 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 97,930 97,604 -0.3 -326
92 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 87,150 86,694 -0.5 -456
93 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 176,543 168,400 -4.6 -8,143
94 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 161,372 159,912 -0.9 -1,460
95 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 107,269 99,017 -7.7 -8,252
96 Jackson, MS 98,096 98,865 0.8 769
97 Provo-Orem, UT 185,640 173,297 -6.6 -12,342
98 Chattanooga, TN-GA 113,020 111,108 -1.7 -1,913
99 Lancaster, PA 183,204 177,825 -2.9 -5,379
100 Modesto, CA 125,609 106,197 -15.5 -19,412
101 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 205,856 200,980 -2.4 -4,876
102 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 168,755 163,183 -3.3 -5,573
103 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 104,548 92,442 -11.6 -12,106
104 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 305,966 274,233 -10.4 -31,733
105 Winston-Salem, NC 123,908 119,580 -3.5 -4,329
106 Lexington-Fayette, KY 139,387 136,011 -2.4 -3,376
107 Spokane, WA 174,261 161,606 -7.3 -12,656
108 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 107,275 104,933 -2.2 -2,342
109 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 96,244 92,808 -3.6 -3,436
110 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 110,433 109,534 -0.8 -899
111 Visalia-Porterville, CA 117,412 103,301 -12.0 -14,111
112 Springfield, MO 104,157 104,414 0.2 257
113 York-Hanover, PA 166,371 158,473 -4.7 -7,898
114 Reno-Sparks, NV 152,746 133,709 -12.5 -19,037
115 Corpus Christi, TX 94,220 94,083 -0.1 -137
116 Port St. Lucie, FL 111,084 102,355 -7.9 -8,729
117 Asheville, NC 159,001 147,230 -7.4 -11,770
118 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 358,900 320,328 -10.7 -38,572
119 Flint, MI 68,702 65,413 -4.8 -3,289
120 Huntsville, AL 124,028 123,814 -0.2 -214
121 Salinas, CA 284,886 248,043 -12.9 -36,843
122 Fort Wayne, IN 94,580 92,994 -1.7 -1,586
123 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 181,513 154,914 -14.7 -26,600
124 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 103,209 101,062 -2.1 -2,148
125 Mobile, AL 97,874 94,063 -3.9 -3,811
126 Reading, PA 165,048 158,158 -4.2 -6,890
127 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 63,487 62,492 -1.6 -995
128 Canton-Massillon, OH 100,695 98,479 -2.2 -2,216
129 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 104,448 106,761 2.2 2,313
130 Manchester-Nashua, NH 198,860 188,063 -5.4 -10,797
131 Salem, OR 175,286 162,515 -7.3 -12,771
132 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 82,520 81,581 -1.1 -939

IHS Global Insight 68


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


133 Anchorage, AK 236,237 238,898 1.1 2,661
134 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 105,458 107,097 1.6 1,639
135 Peoria, IL 112,412 112,059 -0.3 -353
136 Montgomery, AL 97,086 94,687 -2.5 -2,398
137 Fayetteville, NC 112,097 110,902 -1.1 -1,195
138 Tallahassee, FL 123,311 122,153 -0.9 -1,158
139 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 253,990 239,294 -5.8 -14,696
140 Wilmington, NC 164,130 147,650 -10.0 -16,480
141 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 107,666 101,464 -5.8 -6,203
142 Evansville, IN-KY 94,163 94,487 0.3 324
143 Eugene-Springfield, OR 192,655 185,455 -3.7 -7,201
144 Savannah, GA 114,032 110,041 -3.5 -3,992
145 Rockford, IL 114,417 108,955 -4.8 -5,462
146 Ann Arbor, MI 152,083 150,806 -0.8 -1,277
147 Ocala, FL 87,588 77,276 -11.8 -10,312
148 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 104,614 104,068 -0.5 -546
149 Naples-Marco Island, FL 188,781 173,883 -7.9 -14,898
150 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 100,013 96,018 -4.0 -3,995
151 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 109,220 109,977 0.7 757
152 Roanoke, VA 147,047 147,018 0.0 -29
153 Green Bay, WI 129,862 124,191 -4.4 -5,671
154 Charleston, WV 92,759 93,381 0.7 622
155 Lincoln, NE 118,846 122,414 3.0 3,568
156 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 211,028 215,723 2.2 4,696
157 Fort Smith, AR-OK 81,205 81,944 0.9 739
158 Utica-Rome, NY 120,032 122,887 2.4 2,855
159 Columbus, GA-AL 96,740 92,912 -4.0 -3,829
160 Boulder, CO 306,608 308,427 0.6 1,820
161 Lubbock, TX 87,349 87,175 -0.2 -174
162 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 92,703 93,504 0.9 801
163 Spartanburg, SC 94,394 87,713 -7.1 -6,681
164 Erie, PA 109,780 111,690 1.7 1,911
165 Duluth, MN-WI 115,962 114,710 -1.1 -1,252
166 Clarksville, TN-KY 104,700 105,827 1.1 1,127
167 Lafayette, LA 125,788 122,546 -2.6 -3,242
168 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 225,855 208,782 -7.6 -17,072
169 Norwich-New London, CT 216,900 209,484 -3.4 -7,416
170 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 124,688 104,920 -15.9 -19,768
171 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 155,633 140,653 -9.6 -14,979
172 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 306,630 277,660 -9.4 -28,971
173 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 122,897 121,270 -1.3 -1,627
174 Gainesville, FL 126,431 118,711 -6.1 -7,720
175 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 425,927 393,415 -7.6 -32,512
176 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA 153,390 153,341 0.0 -49

IHS Global Insight 69


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


177 Cedar Rapids, IA 111,951 113,032 1.0 1,081
178 Merced, CA 101,076 81,379 -19.5 -19,696
179 Greeley, CO 154,784 150,033 -3.1 -4,750
180 Laredo, TX 89,688 89,155 -0.6 -532
181 Olympia, WA 217,589 200,023 -8.1 -17,566
182 Lynchburg, VA 139,589 139,157 -0.3 -432
183 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 230,769 215,844 -6.5 -14,925
184 Amarillo, TX 95,076 96,221 1.2 1,145
185 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 103,548 101,165 -2.3 -2,382
186 Binghamton, NY 123,826 122,214 -1.3 -1,612
187 Yakima, WA 150,044 146,517 -2.4 -3,527
188 Waco, TX 94,930 95,145 0.2 215
189 Topeka, KS 103,889 100,707 -3.1 -3,182
190 Champaign-Urbana, IL 118,188 118,358 0.1 170
191 Macon, GA 82,523 80,793 -2.1 -1,730
192 College Station-Bryan, TX 114,522 116,748 1.9 2,226
193 Sioux Falls, SD 122,997 124,840 1.5 1,843
194 Appleton, WI 130,474 124,707 -4.4 -5,767
195 Tuscaloosa, AL 111,228 112,733 1.4 1,505
196 Chico, CA 169,737 151,473 -10.8 -18,264
197 Barnstable Town, MA 302,966 290,426 -4.1 -12,541
198 Longview, TX 98,349 98,705 0.4 356
199 Las Cruces, NM 110,822 105,180 -5.1 -5,642
200 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 214,609 216,604 0.9 1,995
201 Tyler, TX 106,023 109,129 2.9 3,106
202 Springfield, IL 106,581 108,460 1.8 1,880
203 Fargo, ND-MN 142,167 144,033 1.3 1,866
204 Prescott, AZ 134,982 125,284 -7.2 -9,698
205 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 115,281 114,011 -1.1 -1,270
206 Florence, SC 83,084 78,815 -5.1 -4,269
207 Medford, OR 177,949 159,372 -10.4 -18,577
208 Charlottesville, VA 225,275 219,770 -2.4 -5,506
209 Lafayette, IN 111,034 109,618 -1.3 -1,416
210 Bellingham, WA 263,029 247,655 -5.8 -15,374
211 Lake Charles, LA 99,163 99,515 0.4 352
212 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 98,134 91,547 -6.7 -6,587
213 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 77,472 74,717 -3.6 -2,755
214 Johnson City, TN 112,667 110,065 -2.3 -2,602
215 Yuma, AZ 89,278 81,759 -8.4 -7,520
216 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 105,282 98,483 -6.5 -6,799
217 Racine, WI 139,714 130,207 -6.8 -9,507
218 Bloomington, IN 123,940 124,077 0.1 136
219 Athens-Clarke County, GA 112,162 108,379 -3.4 -3,782
220 Greenville, NC 97,049 93,503 -3.7 -3,546

IHS Global Insight 70


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


221 St. Cloud, MN 134,009 129,050 -3.7 -4,959
222 Anderson, SC 99,079 90,732 -8.4 -8,346
223 Rochester, MN 131,047 130,145 -0.7 -902
224 Jacksonville, NC 123,490 114,261 -7.5 -9,229
225 Kingston, NY 208,533 197,551 -5.3 -10,982
226 Gainesville, GA 109,676 100,540 -8.3 -9,136
227 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 138,961 135,392 -2.6 -3,569
228 Monroe, LA 96,672 94,944 -1.8 -1,728
229 Redding, CA 153,911 136,754 -11.1 -17,157
230 El Centro, CA 96,355 86,952 -9.8 -9,402
231 Joplin, MO 83,516 88,797 6.3 5,281
232 Columbia, MO 119,258 123,320 3.4 4,061
233 Terre Haute, IN 79,952 77,517 -3.0 -2,434
234 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 77,455 72,122 -6.9 -5,333
235 Bloomington-Normal, IL 129,695 130,270 0.4 574
236 Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL 120,286 118,048 -1.9 -2,237
237 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 107,404 107,457 0.0 53
238 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 120,075 114,926 -4.3 -5,149
239 Yuba City, CA 129,906 104,614 -19.5 -25,292
240 Abilene, TX 81,109 82,017 1.1 908
241 Dover, DE 158,443 136,598 -13.8 -21,845
242 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 125,437 123,434 -1.6 -2,003
243 Pascagoula, MS 95,353 91,097 -4.5 -4,256
244 Eau Claire, WI 120,881 117,013 -3.2 -3,869
245 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 95,929 94,599 -1.4 -1,330
246 Jackson, MI 86,714 82,370 -5.0 -4,344
247 Pueblo, CO 118,048 113,391 -3.9 -4,657
248 Janesville, WI 116,563 109,316 -6.2 -7,247
249 Punta Gorda, FL 106,713 98,566 -7.6 -8,147
250 Billings, MT 156,697 159,726 1.9 3,028
251 Bend, OR 171,685 165,942 -3.3 -5,743
252 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 155,417 140,191 -9.8 -15,227
253 Albany, GA 77,190 75,033 -2.8 -2,157
254 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 109,198 109,320 0.1 121
255 State College, PA 172,417 173,364 0.5 947
256 Alexandria, LA 92,254 91,495 -0.8 -759
257 Decatur, AL 93,820 92,703 -1.2 -1,117
258 Bangor, ME 129,281 121,840 -5.8 -7,440
259 Iowa City, IA 146,375 147,834 1.0 1,459
260 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 131,652 116,367 -11.6 -15,285
261 Rocky Mount, NC 86,471 84,389 -2.4 -2,082
262 Madera-Chowchilla, CA 145,562 120,876 -17.0 -24,686
263 Burlington, NC 109,283 105,120 -3.8 -4,163
264 Monroe, MI 107,180 102,219 -4.6 -4,961

IHS Global Insight 71


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


265 Wichita Falls, TX 79,682 81,369 2.1 1,687
266 Jefferson City, MO 107,598 111,941 4.0 4,343
267 Wheeling, WV-OH 89,579 90,630 1.2 1,051
268 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 93,631 95,068 1.5 1,436
269 Dothan, AL 87,117 83,566 -4.1 -3,551
270 Grand Junction, CO 183,400 165,295 -9.9 -18,105
271 Santa Fe, NM 252,144 240,474 -4.6 -11,670
272 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 91,259 91,641 0.4 381
273 Hattiesburg, MS 88,778 87,639 -1.3 -1,139
274 Dalton, GA 81,261 76,981 -5.3 -4,280
275 Johnstown, PA 95,846 93,794 -2.1 -2,052
276 Warner Robins, GA 87,794 88,403 0.7 609
277 Auburn-Opelika, AL 109,023 106,691 -2.1 -2,332
278 Valdosta, GA 88,045 83,720 -4.9 -4,326
279 Coeur d`Alene, ID 154,052 145,745 -5.4 -8,307
280 St. George, UT 155,919 146,604 -6.0 -9,316
281 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 109,252 100,459 -8.0 -8,792
282 Springfield, OH 95,065 93,345 -1.8 -1,719
283 Napa, CA 303,756 271,059 -10.8 -32,697
284 Midland, TX 128,875 134,066 4.0 5,191
285 Morristown, TN 98,443 101,614 3.2 3,171
286 Odessa, TX 76,447 77,464 1.3 1,017
287 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 79,838 82,453 3.3 2,615
288 Battle Creek, MI 81,308 79,683 -2.0 -1,625
289 Flagstaff, AZ 176,986 166,168 -6.1 -10,818
290 Wausau, WI 125,156 119,951 -4.2 -5,205
291 La Crosse, WI-MN 130,180 127,250 -2.3 -2,930
292 Lebanon, PA 146,511 144,764 -1.2 -1,747
293 Morgantown, WV 124,179 123,636 -0.4 -542
294 Idaho Falls, ID 114,287 117,852 3.1 3,565
295 Anderson, IN 84,252 80,992 -3.9 -3,261
296 Pittsfield, MA 199,656 192,893 -3.4 -6,763
297 Farmington, NM 125,312 119,097 -5.0 -6,215
298 Winchester, VA-WV 145,447 141,372 -2.8 -4,076
299 Glens Falls, NY 169,297 170,330 0.6 1,033
300 Lawton, OK 105,576 100,512 -4.8 -5,064
301 Rapid City, SD 122,084 123,821 1.4 1,737
302 Logan, UT-ID 163,519 159,345 -2.6 -4,175
303 St. Joseph, MO-KS 89,301 91,800 2.8 2,500
304 Bowling Green, KY 111,414 110,805 -0.5 -609
305 Altoona, PA 104,526 104,194 -0.3 -332
306 Harrisonburg, VA 166,495 167,332 0.5 837
307 Salisbury, MD 146,435 128,289 -12.4 -18,146
308 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 78,544 81,712 4.0 3,168

IHS Global Insight 72


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


309 Elizabethtown, KY 118,326 118,828 0.4 502
310 Goldsboro, NC 101,900 98,590 -3.2 -3,310
311 Mansfield, OH 88,556 88,425 -0.1 -131
312 Jonesboro, AR 76,588 77,733 1.5 1,145
313 Sherman-Denison, TX 84,906 87,617 3.2 2,712
314 Anniston-Oxford, AL 80,954 79,902 -1.3 -1,052
315 Muncie, IN 77,174 71,968 -6.7 -5,206
316 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 240,903 212,259 -11.9 -28,644
317 Cleveland, TN 106,377 108,497 2.0 2,120
318 Williamsport, PA 131,513 134,098 2.0 2,585
319 Jackson, TN 86,365 86,060 -0.4 -305
320 Sheboygan, WI 130,759 124,426 -4.8 -6,332
321 Victoria, TX 91,240 91,765 0.6 526
322 Owensboro, KY 89,955 91,204 1.4 1,249
323 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 121,023 117,886 -2.6 -3,137
324 Brunswick, GA 98,134 93,842 -4.4 -4,292
325 San Angelo, TX 95,580 95,890 0.3 310
326 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA 224,209 209,800 -6.4 -14,409
327 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 112,689 107,235 -4.8 -5,454
328 Lawrence, KS 151,041 141,521 -6.3 -9,520
329 Decatur, IL 84,249 83,829 -0.5 -420
330 Bismarck, ND 143,011 150,332 5.1 7,321
331 Missoula, MT 215,132 218,657 1.6 3,525
332 Sumter, SC 90,372 86,425 -4.4 -3,947
333 Bay City, MI 80,796 79,327 -1.8 -1,469
334 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 134,472 128,693 -4.3 -5,779
335 Danville, VA 86,259 94,056 9.0 7,797
336 Lima, OH 94,065 93,814 -0.3 -251
337 Gadsden, AL 85,028 88,886 4.5 3,858
338 Cumberland, MD-WV 115,998 111,443 -3.9 -4,554
339 Longview, WA 169,529 155,935 -8.0 -13,594
340 Fond du Lac, WI 130,149 125,952 -3.2 -4,197
341 Ithaca, NY 165,363 167,252 1.1 1,889
342 Pine Bluff, AR 68,702 67,348 -2.0 -1,354
343 Fairbanks, AK 195,342 197,356 1.0 2,014
344 Grand Forks, ND-MN 126,111 130,451 3.4 4,339
345 Kokomo, IN 81,920 78,432 -4.3 -3,488
346 Ocean City, NJ 287,157 262,474 -8.6 -24,683
347 Palm Coast, FL 132,527 131,870 -0.5 -658
348 Rome, GA 86,103 81,176 -5.7 -4,927
349 Hot Springs, AR 108,586 111,382 2.6 2,796
350 Dubuque, IA 121,821 126,114 3.5 4,293
351 Cheyenne, WY 150,224 155,734 3.7 5,510
352 Pocatello, ID 110,533 110,288 -0.2 -246

IHS Global Insight 73


Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area
(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference


353 Ames, IA 133,704 133,855 0.1 151
354 Elmira, NY 98,715 105,589 7.0 6,874
355 Corvallis, OR 240,928 237,342 -1.5 -3,586
356 Great Falls, MT 132,254 133,995 1.3 1,741
357 Danville, IL 67,973 67,204 -1.1 -769
358 Sandusky, OH 111,593 112,402 0.7 809
359 Columbus, IN 116,652 117,216 0.5 564
360 Casper, WY 148,160 155,123 4.7 6,963
361 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 86,775 81,597 -6.0 -5,177
362 Lewiston, ID-WA 149,344 155,459 4.1 6,115
363 Carson City, NV 155,798 134,502 -13.7 -21,297

IHS Global Insight 74

You might also like