Good Morning Archimedes:
An interview with Archimedes whose 2265 years old principle is being taught all over the world.
Email ajay.pqrs@gmail.com Mobile 94184 50899
Ajay Sharma is working as Assistant Director in Department of Education, Shimla (India). He is author of book Beyond Newton and Archimedes. He began his career as a physics lecturer at DAV College Chandigarh (India).In the book he has generalized Newton’s laws and 2246 years old Archimedes principle. He maintains Newton did never give F =ma but it was speculated by Eular in 1750. Archimedes has been generalized as it does not account for the shape of body. He stresses formation of water barometer as it provides alternate method for measurement of g. It has been done for first time in the history of Science. His second book Beyond Einstein and E=mc2 is in press. He has published over 45 research papers and invited to over 85 international conferences.
. His work is available online at: http://www.AjayOnLine.us
Original Title
Good Morning Archimedes:An interview with Archimedes whose 2265 years old principle is being taught all over the world.
Good Morning Archimedes:
An interview with Archimedes whose 2265 years old principle is being taught all over the world.
Email ajay.pqrs@gmail.com Mobile 94184 50899
Ajay Sharma is working as Assistant Director in Department of Education, Shimla (India). He is author of book Beyond Newton and Archimedes. He began his career as a physics lecturer at DAV College Chandigarh (India).In the book he has generalized Newton’s laws and 2246 years old Archimedes principle. He maintains Newton did never give F =ma but it was speculated by Eular in 1750. Archimedes has been generalized as it does not account for the shape of body. He stresses formation of water barometer as it provides alternate method for measurement of g. It has been done for first time in the history of Science. His second book Beyond Einstein and E=mc2 is in press. He has published over 45 research papers and invited to over 85 international conferences.
. His work is available online at: http://www.AjayOnLine.us
Good Morning Archimedes:
An interview with Archimedes whose 2265 years old principle is being taught all over the world.
Email ajay.pqrs@gmail.com Mobile 94184 50899
Ajay Sharma is working as Assistant Director in Department of Education, Shimla (India). He is author of book Beyond Newton and Archimedes. He began his career as a physics lecturer at DAV College Chandigarh (India).In the book he has generalized Newton’s laws and 2246 years old Archimedes principle. He maintains Newton did never give F =ma but it was speculated by Eular in 1750. Archimedes has been generalized as it does not account for the shape of body. He stresses formation of water barometer as it provides alternate method for measurement of g. It has been done for first time in the history of Science. His second book Beyond Einstein and E=mc2 is in press. He has published over 45 research papers and invited to over 85 international conferences.
. His work is available online at: http://www.AjayOnLine.us
An interview with Archimedes whose 2265 years old principle is being taught all over the world. Email ajay.pqrs@gmail.com Mobile 94184 50899 Part I General Q. !hat is your principle "r Archimedes# Archimedes$ Dont call me Dr rc!ime"es# as $$%5 years be&ore t!ere 'as no (!D "egree. ccor"ing to my principle )'!en bo"y is immerse" in &l*i" +'ater, # its 'eig!t "ecreases . -!e "ecrease in 'eig!t is eq*al to 'eig!t o& t!e 'ater "isplace" by bo"y &rom t!e pot.. Many people /ne' be&ore me t!at 'eig!t o& bo"y "ecreases in 'ater b*t 0 'ent a step a !ig!er. 0 "etermine" "ecrease in 'eig!t o& bo"y in me"i*m. 0n *ni1erse it is my principle '!ic! is e2isting in science as s*c! i.e. *nc*t or *nmo"i&ie". 0t is t!e ol"est establis!e" principle o& science i.e. $$%5 years ol". Q2. !hen mathematical e%uations were derived on the basis o& your principle# Archimedes$ 0n 1%83 in t!e (rincipia 4e'ton "e&ine" acceleration "*e to gra1ity# g. -!*s a&ter 1953 +1%836$50, years mat!ematical eq*ations became &easible on my principle. -!en eq*ations 'ere 'ritten &or 'eig!t an" *pt!r*st. -!e eq*ations '!ic! are "isc*sse" no' became &easible a&ter 5$3 years +$01471%83,. 4one o& t!e scientists "isc*sse" it completely# as it s!o*l" !a1e "one. 0n t!e eq*ations t!e 89:;ME o& bo"y is consi"ere"# not <=(E o& bo"y. >or same 1ol*me bo"y may !a1e any s!ape. Q'. (an a principle be )usti&ied without mathematical e%uation# Archimedes$ 4o ne1er. -!eoretical pre"ictions are ma"e on t!e basis o& mat!ematical eq*ations# t!ese are e2perimentally teste". 0& t!eoretical pre"ictions are &o*n" to be correct# t!en la' is regar"e" as correct. -!e principle cannot be j*sti&ie" 'it!o*t mat!ematical eq*ations. Part II *imitations o& Archimedes principle. Q +. !hat is condition o& &loatation according to your principle# Archimedes$ -!e bo"y &loats '!en "o'n'ar" 'eig!t# becomes eq*al to *p'ar" t!r*st. >or simplicity "ensity o& bo"y m*st be eq*al to "ensity o& me"i*m +'ater,. -!e <=(E o& bo"y !as no role to play# only 1ol*me o& bo"y is consi"ere" in t!e principle. Q5. "oes the ,-AP. o& body has any role to play in &loating bodies according to your principle# Archimedes$ ccor"ing to mat!ematical eq*ations in case o& &loating bo"ies# only "ensity o& bo"y an" "ensity o& me"i*m are signi&icant. -!*s t!e <=(E o& bo"y +sp!erical# *mbrella s!ape"# &lat# t'iste"# long pipe s!ape" etc., !as no role to play at all# it is pre"iction o& my principle. My principle "oes not acco*nt &or t!e <=(E o& bo"y# it is t!e ?0@@E<- limitation. -!e principle only ta/es in acco*nt 89:;ME o& bo"y '!ic! can !a1e "i&&erent s!apes# it is signi&icant in application o& t!e principle. Q 6 /our principle does not ta0e in account ,-AP. o& &loating bodies. ,o it is limitation o& the principle. !hy did you not con&irm it# $ Archimedes$ -!ere are t'o reasons &or t!is. +i, >irstly in my "ays t!ere 'ere no mat!ematical eq*ations as 4e'ton "e&ine" t!e la' o& gra1itation a&ter 1953 years +1%836$50,. -!*s principle 'as *n"erstoo" q*alitati1ely only. +ii, lso e2perimental &acilities to con"*ct e2periments 'ere cip!er in my "ays. <o t!e e&&ect o& <=(E o& bo"y m*st be c!ec/e" no'. A!y "ont scientists c!ec/ it +in case o& in"epen"ently &loating bo"ies, . 4o' scientists claim 'e are going to lan" on mars soon an" "e1elop ne' ci1iliBations. 0 # rc!ime"es also 'ant to /no' t!e *ltimate tr*t!. -!ere are co*ntries li/e ;<# E4@:4D# >C4DE# 04D0E t!ey !a1e e2cellent &acilities to con"*ct s*c! e2periments. -!e e&&ect o& <=(E o& bo"y on "ynamics an" statics can be c!ec/e". ccor"ing to mat!ematical eq*ations base" on t!e principle only 89:;ME o& bo"y is signi&icant not <=(E o& bo"y. Q 1 /our principle does not ta0e in account the ,-AP. o& rising and &alling bodies. ,o it is limitation o& the principle. !hy did you not con&irm it# Archimedes$ Aell# initially 0 ga1e t!e principle &or &in"ing o*t "ecrease in mass +'!en bo"y is immerse" in &l*i",. 0t 'as j*st int*ition. 9n t!e basis o& mat!ematical eq*ations o& my principle# t!e <=(E o& bo"y !as no role to play# in case o& rising an" &alling bo"ies. 9n t!e ot!er !an" a sp!erical particle o& 1 gm &alls q*ic/ly t!an a &lat or "istorte" bo"y. <imilar is tr*e &or rising cor/ in 'ater. -!e s!ape o& bo"y is insigni&icant in &loating bo"ies mat!ematically# b*t e2perimentally it is signi&icant. 0 "i" not "e1elop mat!ematical eq*ations &or t!e principle. 0 "i" not !a1e &acilities to con"*ct e2periments. Q 2 3nder some &easible conditions your principle4 predicts that volume o& material &illed in balloon becomes indeterminate 567684 which is M.A9I9G*.,,. Archimedes$ s 0 tol" yo* t!at 0 !a" gi1en t!e principle as a statement in $50 ?D. -!en 4e'ton p*blis!e" t!e (rincipia in 1%85 an" "e&ine" acceleration "*e to gra1ity +g,# t!en ga1e my principle a mat!ematical basis. -!*s my principle remaine" 'it!o*t mat!ematical eq*ations &or 1953 years o& its en*nciation. 4o' mat!ematical eq*ations are e2isting since past 5$3 years +$01471%83, an" interprete" by jay <!arma. 0t 'as not possible in my time. 4o' jay <!arma !as pri1ilege o& mat!ematical eq*ation. <o !e !a" "ra'n correct eq*ations in t!e researc! papers an" boo/ :eyond 9ewton and Archimedes. -!e 1ol*me can ne1er be ;4DE>04ED or 04DE-ECM04-E +0F0, i.e. 8G8# t!e limitation is limitation. <cience is "ynamic not static. Q ; According to your principle a steel needle &alls down in air as it is denser than air. :ut an aeroplane rises in air and moves. :oth the plane and needle have same densities. Archimedes $ irplanes 'ere not "isco1ere" in my time so 0 "i" not t!in/ abo*t# t!e comparati1e motion o& steel nee"le an" aeroplane. My principle implies t!at !ea1ier +"enser, bo"y m*st &all in lig!ter me"i*m. <o bot! m*st &all "o'n. Q ,o do you admit limitations o& applications o& your principle# Archimedes$ 0 'ill be t!e &irst person to accept limitations o& my principle i& t!ese are really t!ere. 0 "i" not gi1e t!e t!eory &or e2plaining rising# &alling an" &loating bo"ies. 0 ne1er "isc*sse" t!e e&&ect o& <=(E# as s*c! eq*ations 'ere not a1ailable. -!ese eq*ations "o not contain any &actor '!ic! may acco*nt &or <=(E o& bo"y. -!ese are its applications. 0 "ont see in any 5 library o& t!e 'orl" t!at my original !an"'ritten 'or/s s*r1i1es. <cientists !a1e interprete" my 'or/ as t!ey got it &rom 1ario*s so*rces. Q 2 in his research papers and <boo0 beyond 9ewton and Archimedes=4 the critic A)ay ,harma has e>tended your principle and its applications# Archimedes$ Dont call jay <!arma my critic# b*t !e is my great a"mirer# 0 !a1e seen in past t'o t!o*san" years. =e !as &earlessly elaborate" my principle to its &*llest e2tent. 0 co*l" not "o so "*e to lac/ o& mat!ematical eq*ations. 4ormally scientists e2plain t!e principle at preliminary stage an" mo1e a!ea". -!ey t!in/ my 'is"om is in&inite b*t it is not so as 0 am also !*man being. =e !as seen t!e principle in mo"ern conte2t '!ic! 'as impossible in my time. A!y ot!ers are not "oing so. =a" 0 been ali1e at t!is moment 0 'o*l" !a1e "one t!e same. <o !e is 'or/ing &or me an" "oing t!e rig!t t!ing. Part III Generali?ed principle and &uture Q ' @hus your principle is modi&ied to get correct results . @he principle4 applications and related7e>tended applications are described in boo0 A:eyond 9ewton and ArchimedesB in chapters +C6 @he generali?ed principle is HHH..)'!en bo"y is immerse" in &l*i" +'ater, # its 'eig!t "ecreases. -!e "ecrease in 'eig!t is proportional to 'eig!t o& t!e 'ater "isplace" by bo"y &rom t!e pot.. -!is in generaliBe" principle a""itional &actor comes in pict*re# '!en sign o& proportionality is remo1e". 0t acco*nts &or <=(E o& bo"y an" ot!er el*si1e &actors. Archimedes: 0t is 9I. E1en a&ter $$%5 years ol" principle is in *se an" enric!e". -!e generaliBe" principle pre"icts t!e 1ol*me o& me"i*m &ille" in balloon "oes not become ;4DE>04ED or 04DE-ECM04-E +0F0, i.e. 8G0F0# 'e get e2act 1ol*me 8 +8G8,. Q+ !hat is your advice to scientists about you principle# Archimedes$ 0n my "ays t!ere 'ere no mat!ematical eq*ations# no s*c! e2perimental &acilities. <o t!e principle 'as correct at t!at time. Earlier 'e ass*me" t!at t!ere 'ere only 5 planets in solar system b*t no' it is 9. <o science is not static an" absol*te# it is relati1e. 4o' my principle is translate" in terms o& mat!ematical eq*ations# i& ne' pre"ictions are e2perimentally teste"# t!e generaliBation 'ill be con&irme". 0 am eager to see ne' res*lts. A!at is *se o& e2pensi1e an" sop!isticate" laboratories i& el*si1e e2periments are not con"*cte". 0t is not ro*tine b*t inno1ati1e e2periments are important. Q5 ,o now we will start conducting the e>periments which were not possible at your time. I& your principle is &ound true then the principle will e>ist in original &orm till the civili?ation 7human0ind e>ists or will be modi&ied as A)ay ,harma suggested. Archimedes$ 0t is rig!t# 'e 'ill meet '!en t!e inno1ati1e e2periments are o1er. 0 'as inter1ie'e" &or &irst time by someone# it is so nice. -!an/ yo* Email ajay.pqrs@gmail.com Mobile 94184 50899 4