NATIONALPARK-FORSCHUNG IN DER SCHWEIZ (Switzerland Research Park Journal)
Investigating the Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Social Adjustment and Risk-Taking of Male and Female Students of Islamic Azad University
Maryam Masnabadi Department of Humanity Science and Literature, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran
Abstract: The present study investigates the relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment and risk-seeking in male and female students. This research is a descriptive correlation one. The study population consisted of all students in Azad Universityin87-86.The sample included170students(120 females, 50males) who were selected by the relative stratified random sampling method with EI questionnaire of Schering or Siber, Social Adjustment Scale and risks taking ability scale of California. Pearson correlation coefficient T formula was used in independent groups for data analysis. The results showed that there is a significant relationship between emotional intelligence and the social adjustment of female students is at the error level of (01/0> p) and male students at the error level of (05/0P <). But emotional intelligence and risk taking of the students had no significant relationship. On the other hand there is a significant relationship between social adjustment and risk- taking of female and male students. The T-test showed that there are no gender differences between emotional intelligence and social adjustment. But there was a significant difference between risks taking of two genders. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that people with high emotional intelligence level have high social adjustment and higher input to risk taking. On the other hand, there is no significant relationship between social adjustment and risk taking. In addition, there is no gender difference between emotional intelligence and social adjustment, but the amount of risk taking of students varies based on gender (according to the hypothesis). Keywords: Emotional Intelligence, Social Adjustment, Risk Taking
1-Introduction Goleman (1995) considers emotional intelligence as important as IQ for predicting success in life. These opinions developed so that in 1998, Goleman claimed that emotional intelligence is twice as important as technical ability and IQ (Salouvy et al, 2002). It is believed that emotional intelligence is something that is within each of us and somewhat invisible. Emotional intelligence determines how to manage our behavior, how to deal with social problems and 168
how we make decisions that resulted in positive outcomes (Bradbury and Graves, 2005). Emotional intelligence means being aware of the feeling and use it for good decisions in life and ability to withstand trauma and psychological distress and increasing the confidence and self- control. So it supports us against family and social problems, crime, mental disorders and sudden events. Therefore, it brings about healthy families and strong communities and subsequently brings great peace and security. Emotional intelligence helps a person to understand one's own and others', communicate, compatibility and compliance with the environment that is necessary for being successful in bringing social demands(Bar 2000). Social adjustment as the most important sign of mental health is an issue according to many sociologists, psychologists and special educators. Social development is the most important aspect of every person and every measure of social development, consistent with the others. More than 70% of the problems that occur in adolescents and young adults are directly related to their lifestyle. High-risk lifestyle that they choose this class causes many problems and diseases (Suleimani, 1376). Human life in the age of technology and super technology is combined with neglect of social values and prevalence of risk behaviors. Risky behaviors are defined as the behavior of adolescents and young people which put health and well-being of individuals in danger (Suleimani, 1376). For example, it is predicted that by 2020 , the rates of illness and death caused by tobacco consumption will reach to 10 million people a year ( Asalsaky , 2004 , quoted by Suleimaninia , 1384 ) , the physical consequences , social , psychological and other high-risk behaviors such as substance abuse, violence and AIDS into account can multiply the damage ( Suleimaninia , 1384 ). Therefore, considering the young age structure of the country and since youth are the most vulnerable population with risky behaviors, it is obvious that any injury and failure of physical and mental health and, therefore, reduction of the ability of this active class inevitably results in slow progress. On the other hand, lack of physical and mental health may have negative effects on the health of society in the long term (Suleimaninia, 1384). Since compatibility and harmony with himself and his environment is a vital necessity for any living being every day efforts of people are done for compatibility bypasses and they attempt to meet the diverse and sometimes conflicting needs in their environment. It is important to note that this is just one of the ways to achieve compatibility and is one of the ways to increase emotional intelligence. Having emotional intelligence leads to reducing aggression, depression, eating disorders (such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia, substance and food abuse) and socially capable person becomes able to select better target sand aim to continue to achieve the goal. The important thing is that the rational intelligence rate is fixed all the life time and cannot be strengthened, but emotional intelligence can be strengthened in the upbringing of children. Therefore, the introduction of emotional intelligence has opened a new horizon prevention of psychiatric disorders (Akbarzadeh, 1383). The significance of the study is that in addition to having some of the issues related to the Youth Risk Behavior which little research done in this field, it describes the effect of emotional intelligence ability as a psychological variables in how young people dealt with social adjustment. And present study investigated the relationship between emotional intelligence 169
and social adjustment and risk taking ability of male and female students of Islamic Azad University of Arak (87-86 years).
2-Population, sample and sampling The study sample included all male and female (undergraduate) students of Islamic Azad Universityfrom87-1386. A total number of2660studentshave participated in this survey. They were totalof1860female and800male. The sample was selected using stratified sampling. Stratified random samplings the process through which the actual subgroups or categories are selected as part of what exists in the community. These methods are used when the researchers interested in making sure that each class in the community is present in the sample. In discussed method, society is divided into sub- groups called classes and independent samples are selected from each class. Thus, the proportion of each category in the sample is same as classes in society. This technique is called partial sampling. Accordingly, 170 participants were selected from population of 2660.The sample consisted of 120 female and 50 male who were enrolled in undergraduate liberal arts college.
3-Instruments In this study, the following instruments were used to collect data: A -Schering and Siber Inventory of EI. B - Social Adjustment Scale (based on the personality test, Calif.) C - Risk Inventory C-Risk Inventory: EI questionnaires or Siberia consists of 33-item questionnaire with 5points like rt scale, with 5subscales of self-awareness, self-control, empathy, social skills and self- motivation. This has been normalized by Mr.Behzad Mansouri for evaluation and assessment of Tehrans Allameh Tabatabaicases from80-1379. The construct validity of the test scores were evaluated between the test and concept tests on samples of 30 patients. Based on obtained data, 00/0 = p and 63/0 = r obtained from the correlation between subjects' scores on the two tests which is statistically significant and it can be said that construct validity of the EQ is adequate. The 84/0 reliability of the test is calculated using Cronbach alpha. In another study (Rast, 1384) the reliability of the test is obtained by Cronbach alpha (80%). California Social Adjustment Scale (based on personality test in California (CPI)): This test was developed by Clark et al., in 1953 to evaluate various adaptations that compromise dipolar personal and social reconciliation. The questions are prepared in two-option form (right and wrong). This test contains 124 questions and (3) the social subscale (54 questions), accountability (28 questions) and work (42 Questions) which are used for social adaptation. As a result of performing the test, 4 scores are obtained as follows: One. So: the social responsibility 170
Two. Re: Accountability Three. Cm: Cooperation 4. A total score is obtained from the combination of these three factors. California test of social adjustment in research by Sharifi (1376) had reliability coefficients using Spearman Brown and half-Cottman methods by 67% and 2/65, respectively. Risk Inventory, this 32-item questionnaire that assessed their risk preferences had 84% reliability (test - post- test) and its content validity was confirmed by the Alireza Rejaiee (1384).
4-Methodology After receiving permission and a computer list of entries during 87-1386 from Faculty of Humanities, students were grouped according to gender and field of study. A stratified random sampling (that was described in sampling) determined the population according to gender (male and female). The next step, researcher went to the Faculty of Humanities and introduced himself and explained about the study and its objectives to create a safe space provided for the students. Also tips were conducted on how to complete the questionnaire. First the Social Adjustment Scale, then the Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire and at the end risk questionnaire was distributed; this study did not have any time limit therefore, the researcher went to the University randomly to test the students.
5-Descriptive findings Table 1 Descriptive statistics of female students in three variables (Emotional intelligence, social adjustment, risk) SD Mean N Descriptive statistics variables 13 / 12 49 / 96 120 EI 37 / 11 71 / 76 120 Social adjustment 71 / 13 97 / 75 120 Risk taking
As Table 1 shows, the mean and standard deviation of female students in Emotional Intelligence is respectively 49/96 and 13/12; the social adjustment variables are respectively 71/76 and 37/11 and the risk variable is equal to 97/75 and 71/13. 171
Thus it can be concluded that the EI levels of girls is more than social adjustment and risk taking and the level of risk taking in girls is less than EI and social adjustment.
Table 2 Descriptive statistics for male students in three variables (Emotional intelligence, social adjustment, risk taking) SD Mean N Descriptive statistics variables 05 / 17 98 / 97 50 EI 81 / 11 74 / 73 50
Social adjustment
86 / 13 02 / 83 50 Risk taking
As Table 2 shows, the mean and standard deviation of male students in Emotional Intelligence is respectively 98/97 and 05/17; the social adjustment variables are respectively 74/73 and 81/11 and the risk variable is equal to 02/83 and 86/13. Thus it can be concluded that the EI of male students is more than their social adjustment and risk taking and risk taking is less than EI.
6-Analytical findings In the present study, the relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment of the students of Islamic Azad University in Arak are investigated by nine hypotheses; For this research, Pearson correlation analysis and formula T were used for independent groups. Hypothesis1. There is a relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment of female students of Islamic Azad University.
172
Table 3 Pearson correlation between the scores of female students in emotional and social adjustment
As Table3 shows, the first research hypothesis is confirmed. The relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment has an error of less than01/0 >p and is significant; Thus, according to the result sit can be concluded that a significant relationship exists between emotional intelligence and social adjustment of the girls.
As Table 4 shows, the second research hypothesis is confirmed. The relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment has an error of less than 05/0 > P.Thus, according to the results it can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment of boys. Hypothesis 3.There is a relationship Between EI and risk taking of female students of Islamic Azad University.
Social adjustment EI variables statistics index variables 482 / 0 1 Correlation Coefficient EI 000 / 0 - Level of Significance 1 482 / 0 Correlation Coefficient
Social adjustment
- 000 / 0 Level of Significance Social adjustment EI Variables
Statistical index
variables
358 / 0 1 Correlation coefficient EI 011 / 0 - Level of significance 1 358 / 0 Correlation coefficient Social adjustment - 011 / 0 Level of significance 173
Table 5 Pearson correlation coefficients between the scores of Emotional Intelligence and risk taking for female students.
As Table5 shows, the third research hypothesis could not be verified. There is not a significant relationship between emotional intelligence and risk taking of female students. So according to the results it can be concluded that there is not a significant relationship between EIand risks taking of female students. Hypothesis 4.There is a relationship between the EI and risk taking of male students of Arak Azad University.
Table 6: Pearson correlation coefficients between the scores of Emotional Intelligence and risk taking for female students
As Table6 shows, the third research hypothesis could not be verified. There is no significant relationship between emotional intelligence and risk taking in male students; thus, according to the results it can be concluded that there is not a significant relationshipbetweenEIandrisk taking of male students. Hypothesis 5.There is a relationship between social adjustment and risk taking of female students of Islamic Azad University. Risk taking EI variables
variables
154 / 0 1 Correlation coefficient
EI 093 / 0 - Level of significance 1 154 / 0 Correlation coefficient Risk taking
- 093 / 0 Level of significance Risk taking EI variables
Statically index variables
259 / 0 1 Correlation coefficient
EI 070 / 0 - Level of significance 1 259 / 0 Correlation coefficient Risk taking
- 070 / 0 Level of significance 174
Table 7 Pearson correlation coefficient between scores of female students in Social adjustment and risk taking
As Table 7 shows, the fifth hypothesis cannot be verified. There is no significant relationship between emotional intelligence and risk taking of female students; thus, according to the results it can be concluded that there is no significant relationship between EI and risk taking of female students. Hypothesis 6.There is a relationship between social adjustment and risk taking of male students of Islamic Azad University.
Table 8: Pearson correlation coefficient between scores of male students Risk taking Social adjustment variables
As Table8 shows, the sixth hypothesis could not be verified. There is no significant relationship between emotional intelligence and risk taking of male students; thus, according to the results Risk taking Social adjustment variables
it can be concluded that there is no significant relationshipbetweenEIandrisk taking of male students.
7-Conclusions As regression results show there is a relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment of male and female students which is significantly lower than the error level 05/0P <and 01/0> P. The results of the research are consistent with findings of Moshiri (1383). He studied the relationship between social adjustment and emotional intelligence of students and concluded that there is a relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment of students. This study also confirms there results of Shakouri (1382). He examines the emotional and social adjustment among high school students and concluded that there is a positive relationship between social adjustment and emotional intelligence. The results also confirm the barley (1387) that examined the role of a mediator in the relationship between emotional intelligence and general intelligence, resiliency and life satisfaction and concluded that emotional intelligence is predictive of strong resiliency. Harrington and Luther (1997) concluded that emotional intelligence can have a significant role in increasing the accountability and social participation of students. According to the finding obtained in this study and other studies based. On consistent relationship between emotional intelligence and social adjustment, it appears that there is a positive fit between emotional intelligence and life satisfaction, the extent and quality of social relationships and negative relationship between and isolation. As the correlation results for the relationship between EIand risks taking of students showed, there is no relationship between EIand risks taking of the students. The results of this research are not consistent with findings of Moshiri(1383) who examined the relationship between emotional intelligence and aggression in children and concluded that there is relationship between emotional intelligence and aggression in school children. These results were not consistent with research findings of Esmalili (1386) who studied the effect of education on mental health based on components of emotional intelligence and concluded that teaching emotional intelligence components improves mental health. Although based on existing knowledge in the related fields of criminal and deviant behavior, and emotional intelligence, one can expectant inverse correlation between emotional intelligence and criminal behavior, but there are very few theories and research findings that specifically target at such relationship. As regression results for relationship between social adjustment and risk taking of students show there was no significant relationship between social adjustment and risk taking of the students. The results of these research is not consistent with findings Mohammad Khani (1386) who evaluated the effects of indirect and direct feedback to the substance, locus of control and personal and social skills of adolescents at risk for drug deals and concluded that the latent variables are the attitudes towards drug use, avoidance skills (self) and an inner sense of control through direct and indirect social competence in adolescents at risk for drug use. And also the results of the present research are not consistent with Binson study (1998) of high school students which showed that increasing the positive characteristics of adolescents, such as self-esteem, sense of integrity, resiliency, purpose in life, positive relationships with peers and so reduced the incidence of risky behaviors at risk, such as smoking, alcohol, drugs and anti-social behavior. In fact, as both personal and social resources the individual are greater 176
her ability to abstain from drug use would be stronger, which in turn is connected directly to the low consumption of materials. Capabilities of substance abuse as a learned social behavior that results from the interaction of individual and social factors have to be considered. This approach believes that people with poor personal and social skills are not only vulnerable to the factors encouraging drug use, but tend to consume drugs as alternative coping strategies.
Reference: 1. Aghayari , S. Sharifi , J. ( 1385). Emotional intelligence (application in the realm of emotion ) , Press Corps. 2. Akbarzadeh, N. (1383 ). Emotional intelligence (view Salouvy and others), Publications al 3. Atari, Y. (1382). Effects of group social skills training in personal Adjustment - Social juvenile offenders in the city of Gunbad. Journal of Educational Psychology, XII, No. 2, pp. 46-25. 4. Kaplan , G. 1383 ). Summary of Mental Health. (Translated). Tehran: Shahrab. 5. Austin, E.J, Saklofeske, D.H & Egan. V. (2005) Personality, Well being and Health Correlates of Trait Emotional Intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences. 6. Bar-On, R. (2000). Emotional and Social Intelligence. Handbook of Emotional Intelligence. San Francisco: Joss y-Bass. 7. Biabangard , E. (1382 ). Adolescent Psychology, Tehran : Islamic Culture Publishing Office . 8. Bradbury , T, & Graves, DJ ( 2005). Emotional intelligence (skills test), translated by Mehdi Ganji , 1384 , Tehran Shavalan. 9. Delaware , A. (1384 ). Research Methods in Psychology and Educational Sciences, the Institute of publication editing. 10. Engelberg. E- &Sjoberg, L. (2004). Emotional Intelligences, Affect Intensity, and Social Adjustment. Personality and Individual Differences. 535-542. 11. Esmaeili , M. , Ahadi , H. , Delaware, ShafiAbadi , A. ( 1386). The effect of education on mental health component of emotional intelligence , Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology , 10, No. 2 , pp. 165-158. 12. Eve , J. M. ( 1376). Motivation and Emotion: translated by Syed Mohammad Yahya , publication editing. 13. Gardner, H. (1983). Formes of Mind: Then Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic books. 14. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New YorkBanton Books. 15. Goodstein, L.D & Lanyon R.T. (1995). Adjustment Behaviour and Personality. ArizonaStateUniversity. 177
16. Hosseinian , S. &, Emami M. (1385 ) Comparison of emotional intelligence and assertiveness in blind and normal male and female students , practical Journal of Psychology , pp. 19 to 29. 17. Khan Mohammad , A. et al, ( 1386). The relationship between emotional intelligence and assertiveness with the participation of English language learners. foreign language research journal , 1386 , No. 38 , pp. 19 to 41. 18. Khushabi , K.(1384 ). Prevalence of behavior disorders in primary school students in Ilam Rehabilitation of mental disorders , Volume VIII , Number 29 , pp. 33-28 . 19. Parker, J.D, Taylor, G.J. &Bagby, R. (2001) Relationship Between Alexithymia and Intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences. 20. Sartre , J.P. (1377 ). Emotion theor , translated by Ali Azarang ( Jabari ) , Nazan publication . 21. Schutte, Nicolas and Others (2001). Emotional Intelligence and Interpersonal Relation Journal of Social Psychology. 22. SeifNaraghi , M. &Naderi, E. ( 1381). Especial diabilities in learning how to recognize failure and rehabilitation methods , Tehran. 23. SepahMansour , M. ( 1386). Impact on the motivation for the development of life skills , self- esteem and social adjustment , Journal of Thought and Behavior, Volume II , pp. 46- 25 . 24. Share, H. & Mahmoud Farid. Relationship between emotional intelligence and risk factors in adolescent girls running away from home , Journal of Social Welfare , Issue 21 , pp. 243-225 . 25. Suleimaninia , L. (1384 ). Role in the emergence of high-risk behaviors in adolescent mental health , Journal of Social Welfare , Issue 19 , pp. 90 -75 . 26. Syarouchy, J.). Emotional Intelligence in Everyday Life , translated by A. Nouri Imam convention , HabibollahNassiri , Isfahan posted . 27. Watkin, Chris (2000). Developing Emotional Intelligence, International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 28. Weisinger, H. (1998). Emotional Intelligence at Work, San Francisco.