State, sovereignty, power, capabilities, hegemonic stability theory. Competition for power power is control over the minds and actions of the others. Survival is a condition for attaining all other goals.
State, sovereignty, power, capabilities, hegemonic stability theory. Competition for power power is control over the minds and actions of the others. Survival is a condition for attaining all other goals.
State, sovereignty, power, capabilities, hegemonic stability theory. Competition for power power is control over the minds and actions of the others. Survival is a condition for attaining all other goals.
Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam Essentials of Realism Statism: state, sovereignty, power, capabilities, hegemonic stability theory. Survival: Self-help: security dilemma, Statism State is the main actor and sovereignty is its distinguish trait. Sovereignty: state has supreme authority to make and enforce laws. Domestically: state provides security to its citizens Internationally: many threats and dangers to states survival because of anarchy - no central authority to bind all countries. Realism Competition: zero-sume game Politics is a struggle for power Power is control over the minds and actions of the others. Power is a relational and relative concept. Kenneth Waltz: capabilities: strength in population, territory, resources, economic capability, military strength, political stability and competence, state ability to control or influence its environment. Critics: exclusive focus on state power; state is the only actor, collective response to global issues. Hegemonic stability theory Survival In international politics, the pre-eminent goal is survival. Ultimate concern of states is security. Survival is a condition for attaining all other goals. Defensive realists (Waltz and Grieco): security is states principal interest and only seek the requisite amount of power to ensure their own survival. Not seek more power if it damages security. Existence of Status quo powers lessens power competition. Realism Offensive realists (Mearsheimer): the ultimate goal of all states is to achieve a hegemonic position on the international system. States desire more power and are willing to change the existing distribution of power (if they can + even if it undermines their security). Revisionist states and aspiring hegemons are always willing to take risks with the goal of increasing their position in the international system. Henry Kissinger: a nations survival is its first and ultimate responsibility; it cannot be compromised or put to risk. Critics: no limits to states actions in the name of necessity? Self-help International structure: no higher authority to prevent and counter the use of force. Security is only achieved through self-help: in an anarchic structure self-help is necessarily the principle of action. Security dilemma: In pursuing ones own security, the state will automatically fuel the insecurity of other states. How can states solve security dilemma> Balance of power Critics: not inevitable consequence of the system, but the game states chose to play. Examples of collective security or regional integration. Liberalism Liberty of the individual From the 18 th century onwards, Liberalism has strong impact on the world politics. Liberal internationalism Idealism Liberal institutionalism Liberal internationalism Immanuel Kant and Jeremy Bentham: Natural order has been corrupted by undemocratic state leaders and out-dated policies such as balance of power. Contact between peoples of the world: commerce, travel a more pacific form of international relations. Idealism Importance of constructing an international order. Freedom of states is part of the problem of international relations, not solutions/ How to promote peace and build a better world. Role of international organizations: rules and norms. I.O facilitate peaceful change, disarmament, arbitration and enforcement (when necessary). League of Nations (1920): collective security system failed to prevent the WW II. United Nations (1945): membership was near universal + great powers were able to enforce any enforcement action from taking place which might be contrary to their interests. Liberal institutionalism In the 1940s, turned to international organisations Integration in Europe. New challenges to realism. Focus on transnational corporations, NGOs, new patterns of interaction: interdependence, integration.