Name of Staff

Name of Subject
Class
No of students Evaluated 33 Out of 47
No in favour
of Credit Marks
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 1 3 3
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Regular 33 10 330
Irregular 0 0 0
Yes 0 0 0
No 33 10 330
Excellent 2 10 20
Satisfactory 31 5 155
Poor 0 0 0
Just right 32 10 320
Too fast 1 2 2
Too slow 0 2 0
Yes 33 10 330
No 0 0 0
Pleasant 25 10 250
Indifferent 5 2 10
Unpleasant 3 0 0
Effective 29 10 290
Rarely uses 2 3 6
Not at all uses 0 0 0
Sincere 33 10 330
Not Sincere 0 0 0
Too strict 0 3 0
Too liberal 2 3 6
Just right 33 10 330
Quite prompt 32 10 320
Not prompt 1 0 0
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 0 3 0
Poor 0 0 0
4258
92.16
NOORUL ISLAM CENTRE FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Dept of Civil Engineering
Staff Evaluation Report-II
Mr.R.Donald Tony
CV210,Transpottation Engineering I
S4A, B.E.Civil Engineering
Evaluated on 16/04/2014
1 Knowledge of Teacher in the Subject
2
Clarity and understandability of teachers
explanation
3 Teachers willingness to help
4 Regularity in engaging classes
5
Wether the Teacher dictates notes only without
explanation
6 Teachers ability to organize Lectures.
7 Speed of Presentation
8 Does the teacher encourage Questioning
9 Behaviour of the teacher
10 Use of Black Board
11 Sincerity of the teacher
12 Norms of valuation of tests and assignments
13 Promptness in valuation tests and assignments
14 Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Total Marks
Weighted Points:
Name of Staff
Name of Subject
Class
No of students Evaluated 33 Out of 47
No in favour
of Credit Marks
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Regular 33 10 330
Irregular 0 0 0
Yes 0 0 0
No 33 10 330
Excellent 2 10 20
Satisfactory 31 5 155
Poor 0 0 0
Just right 31 10 310
Too fast 2 2 4
Too slow 0 2 0
Yes 33 10 330
No 0 0 0
Pleasant 25 10 250
Indifferent 5 2 10
Unpleasant 3 0 0
Effective 29 10 290
Rarely uses 2 3 6
Not at all uses 0 0 0
Sincere 33 10 330
Not Sincere 0 0 0
Too strict 0 3 0
Too liberal 2 3 6
Just right 33 10 330
Quite prompt 32 10 320
Not prompt 1 0 0
Excellent 25 10 250
Good 5 6 30
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
4213
91.19
14 Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Total Marks
Weighted Points:
12 Norms of valuation of tests and assignments
13 Promptness in valuation tests and assignments
10 Use of Black Board
11 Sincerity of the teacher
8 Does the teacher encourage Questioning
9 Behaviour of the teacher
6 Teachers ability to organize Lectures.
7 Speed of Presentation
4 Regularity in engaging classes
5
Wether the Teacher dictates notes only without
explanation
2
Clarity and understandability of teachers
explanation
3 Teachers willingness to help
1 Knowledge of Teacher in the Subject
Mr.D.Allwin
CV209,Applied Hydraulic Engineering
S4A, B.E.Civil Engineering
Evaluated on 16/04/2014
NOORUL ISLAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Dept of Civil Engineering
Staff Evaluation Report-II
Name of Staff
Name of Subject
Class
No of students Evaluated 33 Out of 47
No in favour
of Credit Marks
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 1 3 3
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Regular 33 10 330
Irregular 0 0 0
Yes 0 0 0
No 33 10 330
Excellent 2 10 20
Satisfactory 31 5 155
Poor 0 0 0
Just right 32 10 320
Too fast 1 2 2
Too slow 0 2 0
Yes 33 10 330
No 0 0 0
Pleasant 25 10 250
Indifferent 5 2 10
Unpleasant 3 0 0
Effective 29 10 290
Rarely uses 2 3 6
Not at all uses 0 0 0
Sincere 33 10 330
Not Sincere 0 0 0
Too strict 0 3 0
Too liberal 2 3 6
Just right 33 10 330
Quite prompt 32 10 320
Not prompt 1 0 0
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 0 3 0
Poor 0 0 0
4258
92.16
14 Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Total Marks
Weighted Points:
12 Norms of valuation of tests and assignments
13 Promptness in valuation tests and assignments
10 Use of Black Board
11 Sincerity of the teacher
8 Does the teacher encourage Questioning
9 Behaviour of the teacher
6 Teachers ability to organize Lectures.
7 Speed of Presentation
4 Regularity in engaging classes
5
Wether the Teacher dictates notes only without
explanation
2
Clarity and understandability of teachers
explanation
3 Teachers willingness to help
1 Knowledge of Teacher in the Subject
Mr.S.Mathan Kumar
CV208/Surveying for Construction II
S4A, B.E.Civil Engineering
Evaluated on 16/04/2014
NOORUL ISLAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Dept of Civil Engineering
Staff Evaluation Report-II
Name of Staff
Name of Subject
Class
No of students Evaluated 33 Out of 47
No in favour
of Credit Marks
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 1 3 3
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Regular 33 10 330
Irregular 0 0 0
Yes 8 0 0
No 25 10 250
Excellent 2 10 20
Satisfactory 31 5 155
Poor 0 0 0
Just right 32 10 320
Too fast 1 2 2
Too slow 0 2 0
Yes 33 10 330
No 0 0 0
Pleasant 25 10 250
Indifferent 5 2 10
Unpleasant 3 0 0
Effective 29 10 290
Rarely uses 2 3 6
Not at all uses 0 0 0
Sincere 33 10 330
Not Sincere 0 0 0
Too strict 0 3 0
Too liberal 2 3 6
Just right 33 10 330
Quite prompt 32 10 320
Not prompt 1 0 0
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 0 3 0
Poor 0 0 0
4178
90.43
14 Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Total Marks
Weighted Points:
12 Norms of valuation of tests and assignments
13 Promptness in valuation tests and assignments
10 Use of Black Board
11 Sincerity of the teacher
8 Does the teacher encourage Questioning
9 Behaviour of the teacher
6 Teachers ability to organize Lectures.
7 Speed of Presentation
4 Regularity in engaging classes
5
Wether the Teacher dictates notes only without
explanation
2
Clarity and understandability of teachers
explanation
3 Teachers willingness to help
1 Knowledge of Teacher in the Subject
Mr.Y.Stalin Jose
CV207/Advanced Strenght of materials
S4A, B.E.Civil Engineering
Evaluated on 16/04/2014
NOORUL ISLAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Dept of Civil Engineering
Staff Evaluation Report -II
Name of Staff
Name of Subject
Class
No of students Evaluated 33 Out of 47
No in favour
of Credit Marks
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 1 3 3
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Regular 33 10 330
Irregular 0 0 0
Yes 0 0 0
No 33 10 330
Excellent 2 10 20
Satisfactory 31 5 155
Poor 0 0 0
Just right 25 10 250
Too fast 5 2 10
Too slow 3 2 6
Yes 33 10 330
No 0 0 0
Pleasant 25 10 250
Indifferent 5 2 10
Unpleasant 3 0 0
Effective 29 10 290
Rarely uses 2 3 6
Not at all uses 0 0 0
Sincere 33 10 330
Not Sincere 0 0 0
Too strict 0 3 0
Too liberal 2 3 6
Just right 33 10 330
Quite prompt 32 10 320
Not prompt 1 0 0
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 0 3 0
Poor 0 0 0
4202
90.95
14 Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Total Marks
Weighted Points:
12 Norms of valuation of tests and assignments
13 Promptness in valuation tests and assignments
10 Use of Black Board
11 Sincerity of the teacher
8 Does the teacher encourage Questioning
9 Behaviour of the teacher
6 Teachers ability to organize Lectures.
7 Speed of Presentation
4 Regularity in engaging classes
5
Wether the Teacher dictates notes only without
explanation
2
Clarity and understandability of teachers
explanation
3 Teachers willingness to help
1 Knowledge of Teacher in the Subject
Ms.R.Roselin
CV206/Geotechnical Engineering
Evaluated on 16/04/2014
NOORUL ISLAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Dept of Civil Engineering
Staff Evaluation Report-II
S4A, B.E.Civil Engineering
Name of Staff
Name of Subject
Class
No of students Evaluated 33 Out of 47
No in
favour of Credit Marks
Excellent 25 10 250
Good 5 6 30
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Excellent 28 10 280
Good 2 6 12
Fair 3 3 9
Poor 0 0 0
Regular 33 10 330
Irregular 0 0 0
Yes 0 0 0
No 33 10 330
Excellent 2 10 20
Satisfacto
ry 31 5 155
Poor 0 0 0
Just right 32 10 320
Too fast 1 2 2
Too slow 0 2 0
Yes 33 10 330
No 0 0 0
Pleasant 25 10 250
Indifferen
t 5 2 10
Unpleasan
t 3 0 0
Effective 29 10 290
Rarely
uses 2 3 6
Not at all
uses 0 0 0
Sincere 33 10 330
Not
Sincere 0 0 0
Too strict 0 3 0
Too
liberal 2 3 6
Just right 33 10 330
Quite
prompt 32 10 320
Not
prompt 1 0 0
Excellent 30 10 300
Good 2 6 12
Fair 0 3 0
Poor 0 0 0
4232
91.60
14 Overall teaching effectiveness of the teacher
Total Marks
Weighted Points:
11 Sincerity of the teacher
12 Norms of valuation of tests and assignments
13 Promptness in valuation tests and assignments
8 Does the teacher encourage Questioning
9 Behaviour of the teacher
10 Use of Black Board
5
Wether the Teacher dictates notes only without
explanation
6 Teachers ability to organize Lectures.
7 Speed of Presentation
2 Clarity and understandability of teachers explanation
3 Teachers willingness to help
4 Regularity in engaging classes
S4A, B.E.Civil Engineering
Evaluated on 16/04/2014
1 Knowledge of Teacher in the Subject
NOORUL ISLAM COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
Dept of Civil Engineering
Staff Evaluation Report-II
Ms.M.Deva Saroja
MA203/Numerical methods