Professional Documents
Culture Documents
absorbance vs wavelength
Mitul Patel 5
Figure 9. Gold nanoparticles produced by Method C while still under
preparation. The colour of the colloidal solution is ruby red.
Figure 10. Gold nanoparticles produced using Method C precipitated
quickly to pink.
Figure 11. Shows the absorption spectrum of the gold nanoparticles
produced by method C.
As can be seen from the experimental procedure, method A
and method B had the same amount of sodium citrate
dissolved in the same amount of gold stock solution. The
citrate basically act as a reducing agent (reducing agent is an
element or compound that loses electron in a redox chemical
reaction) and as a stabiliser. The citrate anions electrostatic
repulsion keeps the nanoparticles separated and so prevents
the nanoparticles from aggregating. Reducing the amount of
citrate causes the nanoparticles to aggregate, to a point at
which they precipitate. Therefore the solution turns into
black. This could have been one of the reason why, the
solution of method B precipitated into black over time.
Temperature also have a strong influence on the size of gold
nanoparticles. Generally, the greater the energy and
concentration of the reducing agent, the smaller the resultant
gold particles in the suspension; reducing the temperature
shifts the size and quality of gold nanoparticles towards
larger diameter. In method A, the solution was boiled to
100
o
C so greater energy was supplied to the nanoparticles to
form resultant gold particles of size 25nm. Whereas in
method B, the solution was exposed to UV lamp and as the
solution turned black over out, this could mean that the UV
could not provide sufficient energy for smaller particles to
form. As a result, we had to expose the solution to UV lamp
for much longer period than we were suggested in the
protocol that was provided to us and so method B was not
analysed further.
In Method C, the solution was only stirred so it had the
lowest activation energy. This method did produce red
solution, but the solution quickly formed a precipitate. At
the instant when the solution was produced it was red, then
the solution formed dark purple precipitate, and at last
solution formed dirty blue/brown precipitate. The size of
gold nanoparticle of method C was determined to be 19nm.
Conclusion
Method A was found to be the best method so far to produce
gold nanoparticles. The size of gold nanoparticles produced
by method A was 36nm by route (I) and 25nm by route (II).
Method C was the second best method to produce gold
nanoparticles and the size of these particles was determined
to be 19nm by route (I).
The experimental method of B and C could be improved
further by using a much more efficient UV lamp which
could provide higher activation energy. Also the equation
used in our experiments was not the right equation, as it can
only be applied to particle size greater than 10-15nm. The
red colour gold nanoparticles are usually size of 10nm as
can be seen in figure 1. Using the right equation could lead
to the precise value of gold nanoparticles. Therefore, I
conclude that the route (II) was the best method to determine
the size of gold nanoparticles, as the value provided by that
method was fairly precise than route (I).
References
[1] Nanotechnology timeline, http://www.nano.gov/timeline
[2] Stained glass, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stained_glass
[3] Ramsden, J. (2011). Nanotechnology. Oxford ,Waltham,
MA: William Andrew/Elsevier.
[4] Takeichi, N. (2012). Geostationary station keeping
control of a space elevator during initial cable deployment.
Acta Astronautica, 70(0), 85-89.
[5] Heiligtag, F. J., & Niederberger, M. (2013). The
fascinating world of nanoparticle research. Materials Today,
16(78), 262-271.
[6] Philippe Colomban. (2009). The use of metal
nanoparticles to produce yellow, red and iridescent colour,
from bronze age to present times in lustre pottery and glass:
Solid state chemistry, spectroscopy and nanostructure.
Journal of Nano Research, 8, 109. doi:10.4028.
[7] Susie Eustis and Mostafa A. El-Sayed (2005). Why gold
nanoparticles are more precious than pretty gold: Nobel
metal surface plasmon resonance and its enhancement of the
radiative and nonradiative properties of nanocrystals of
different shapes. doi: 10.1039/B514191E
[8] Gold Nanoparticles: Optical Properties,
http://nanocomposix.com/pages/gold-nanoparticles-optical-
properties
490 300 310 320 330
-0.2
-0.13
-0.1
-0.03
0
0.03
0.1
0.13
0.2
0.23
wavelengLh/nm
a
b
s
o
r
b
a
n
c
e
/
absorbance vs wavelength
Mitul Patel 6
[9] J. Kimling, M. Maier, B. Okenve, V. Kotaidis, H. Ballot,
and A. Plech (2006). Turkevich Method for Gold
Nanoparticle Synthesis Revisited.
Appendix
The results obtained using the spectrophotometer are given
in table 1 and table 2 below.
Wavelength
nm
Absorbance
%
Absorbance +
calibration value
500 -0.152 0
501 -0.152 0
502 -0.152 0
503 -0.152 0
504 -0.152 0
505 -0.152 0
506 -0.143 0.009
507 -0.129 0.023
508 -0.11 0.042
509 -0.049 0.103
510 0.037 0.189
511 0.143 0.295
512 0.211 0.363
513 0.287 0.439
514 0.404 0.556
515 0.475 0.627
516 0.456 0.608
517 0.44 0.592
518 0.409 0.561
519 0.386 0.538
520 0.365 0.517
521 0.344 0.496
522 0.323 0.475
523 0.303 0.455
524 0.281 0.433
525 0.266 0.418
526 0.249 0.401
527 0.236 0.388
528 0.221 0.373
529 0.207 0.359
530 0.195 0.347
531 0.183 0.335
532 0.175 0.327
533 0.16 0.312
534 0.151 0.303
535 0.136 0.288
536 0.124 0.276
537 0.111 0.263
538 0.095 0.247
539 0.079 0.231
540 0.064 0.216
541 0.048 0.2
542 0.031 0.183
543 0.011 0.163
544 -0.01 0.142
545 -0.034 0.118
546 -0.058 0.094
547 -0.082 0.07
548 -0.108 0.044
549 -0.139 0.013
550 -0.152 0
Table 1. Shows the data of method A obtained using the spectrophotometer.
wavelengLh/nm absorbance
497 -0.134
498 -0.134
499 -0.107
300 -0.043
301 0.087
302 0.178
303 0.169
304 0.133
303 0.09
306 0.068
307 0.03
308 0.031
309 0.014
310 -0.007
311 -0.026
312 -0.044
313 -0.06
314 -0.07
313 -0.08
316 -0.089
317 -0.089
318 -0.1
319 -0.106
320 -0.111
321 -0.117
322 -0.124
323 -0.128
324 -0.13
323 -0.132
326 -0.133
327 -0.134
328 -0.134
329 -0.134
Table 2. Shows the data of method C when the experiment was repeated
for the second time obtained using the spectrophotometer.
Mitul Patel 7