Letter from the Secretary General An Introduction to AKAHMUN About the Secretariat Conference Schedule Delegate Preparation Conference Procedure Helpful Resources Contact Information TABLE OF CONTENTS
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 3
Letter from the Secretary General
Dear delegates, Welcome to the inaugural edition of The Aga Khan Academy, Hyderabad Model United Nations! We hope that you are as excited as we are for an amazing weekend that lies ahead of us. You will experience, for the first time at the Aga Khan Academy one of the most exciting, gripping and intense conference. What's unique about AKAHMUN is that you will have the opportunity to debate on issues of global concern and assume the roles of UN diplomats. Your aim through this conference will be to try and come up with a solution to some of the most peace threatening conflicts between these several nations of the world that is acceptable to all the parties involved. You will be challenged at every step, as you attempt to put forth your opinion, ensure the welfare of your people, and most importantly protect your nation. The people of your nation look up to you and trust you to act in their best interest. So gear up to be part of a one of its kind conclave of worldwide leaders as they attempt to shape world history. We look forward to seeing you at the conference!
Yours Sincerely, Alisha Sonawalla, Secretary General AKAHMUN 2013
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 4
An Introduction to AKAHMUN
Hosted by the Aga Khan Academy, Hyderabad, AKAHMUN is a platform that brings together distinct delegates to express their views and discuss matters of grave importance to the global society. By simulating organs of the United Nations, AKAHMUN, 2013 aims to provide an opportunity for delegates to practice and develop their skills in research, negotiation, debate and diplomacy.
AKAHMUN is an initiative of the umbrella organization The Aga Khan Academy Students International Relations Council, which aims to increase awareness of global issues in the Academy and the society at large.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 5
About the Secretariat, Executive Board & OC
Alisha Sonawalla Secretary General Crisis Director
Reaa Mehta Director General Crisis Director
Susant Polavarapu Under-Secretary General General Assembly Director, DISEC
9.00 am 10.30 am Committee session I 10.30 am 11.00 am Snack break 11.00 am 1.00 pm Committee session II 1.00 pm 2.00 pm Lunch 2.00 pm 4.00 pm Closing ceremony and awards
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 8
Delegate Preparation
Badges/ ID cards
These will be handed out to the delegates on the first day of the conference. They are to be worn at all times.
Food and Beverages
Delegates will be provided with lunch and beverages on all three days of the conference.
Dress Code
Delegates may dress in western formals, Indian formals or school uniforms. Boys may wear either a suit or a jacket, a button down shirt and dress pants. A necktie is essential, as are dress shoes. Sandals, jeans and other such patently informal articles of clothing will not be allowed. Girls may wear dresses, skirts or slacks. Miniskirts are not permitted and blouses and sweaters must be appropriate for the occasion. Alternatively boys may wear kurta- pajama and girls may wear salwar-kameez or other Indian formals. If any delegate wishes to wear his/her school uniform they may do so.
Study Guides
Study guides for individual committees have been posted on the website. These will be the foundation for your research for the conference.
SCOPE The rules outlined shall apply to all regular sessions of all committees. These rules are self- sufficient and no other rules shall apply, unless otherwise stated in the supplementary rules for any committee. In situations that are not covered by the rules, the Chair shall have the final authority.
LANGUAGE English will be the official and working language of the conference.
STATEMENT BY THE SECRETARIAT At any time any member of the Secretariat may make an oral or written statement or announcement to the committee regarding an update of their topic, also called an emergency. Such an announcement is usually not questionable. Exceptions will be discussed with delegates.
GENERAL POWERS OF THE COMMITTEE STAFF The chairs will declare the opening and closing of each committee session and have the power to pass anything at their discretion. The chairs have control over the proceedings of committee at all times with regard to procedure. The chairs will direct the flow of formal debate, accord the right to speak, put questions before the committee, announce decisions, rule on points of order and ensure and enforce the observance of these rules. The Press Corps is free to publish any material that lies within the scope of this conference and all delegates participating in this conference hereby agree to be quoted/ referenced/ represented in photographs of all press publications. The Press may enter and observe committee proceedings on the basis that the committee has no significant objections to their presence.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 10 APPEAL Delegates are free to appeal any decision made by the Moderator or Director. However, it is the Directors decision to accept or reject any appeals. Should the appeal not be related to immediate committee proceedings but the committee as a whole, the delegates may appeal to the Secretariat.
ON DEBATE Debate is initiated with the General Speakers List through a motion introduced by a delegate. All delegates who wish to have their name on the general speakers list will be asked to raise their placard at the beginning, followed by which delegates may pass a chit to the chair requesting their name to be added to the list. To counter this, delegates may (and should) motion for a Moderated Caucuses on specific parts of the topic area. For example, if the topic of the day were the Indo-Pak war of 1947, at some point delegates may motion for a ten minute moderated caucus, with an allotted time of thirty seconds per speaker, to discuss the division of Kashmir. During the particular moderated caucus, if a delegate strays from the given topic, a Point of Order (explained below) could be called as a reprimand. Overall the debate in a moderated caucus proceeds much more rapidly than that of the Speakers List.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 11 DEBATE Debate may be carried out through: General Speakers List Special Speakers List Moderated Caucus Un-moderated Caucus
General Speakers List: The General Speakers List is open throughout the discussion of the topic area. Motions to open any other medium of debate will not close the General Speakers List, but will only overlap it. Hence, if your country is in queue to speak on it and another medium of debate is opened, your country will remain that position once the General Speakers List is returned to. To get your country on the list, simply pass a note to the chair stating your desire to be added to the end of the list. Speakers List is ordered on a first come first serve basis provided that their name is not already on the list. Anything within the scope of the topic area may be discussed. The General Speakers List may never be closed. After a delegate finishes his/her speech, he has the option of yielding.
WHAT ARE YIELDS? During formal debate, delegates must specify how they wish to yield their after his speech as concluded. If a delegate fails to specify how he or she will be yielding his or her time, the yield will default to the Chair unless otherwise specified by the Chair. Delegates can yield their time in one of four ways: To the Chair: The remaining speaking time is forfeit and the committee moves on. To Comments: Two delegates will be recognized by the chair to make thirty-second comments pertaining solely to the speech just delivered. The Chair shall call to order a speaker whose comments are not germane to the preceding speech. If a delegate yields his or her remaining time to comments, two thirty-second comments are always granted, regardless of remaining speaking time. To Another Delegate: The delegate may grant the balance of his or her speaking time to another delegate. A dele-gate who has been yielded to may not make further yields on the remaining time.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 12 To Questions: The delegate may use the remainder of his or her time to answer questions posed by other dele-gates. The Chair shall select delegates to pose questions, and only the time used to respond to questions shall be counted against the speakers remaining time. The Chair may cut off a delegate who takes too long to ask a question.
CAUCUS During any point of general debate a delegate may propose a caucus and designate a type, time limit, reason and in the case of a moderated caucus, a speaking time. There are two types of Caucuses: Moderated Caucus: The purpose of a moderated caucus is to facilitate substantive debate at critical junctures in the discussion. The approval of such a motion rests entirely in the hands of the committee staff and is not subject to appeal. During a moderated caucus, the Director will suspend the Speakers List, and call on delegates to speak at his/her discretion. A moderated caucus is also opened for a specified purpose and a specified time. In a moderated Caucus, try to be precise and to the point. As far as possible, refrain from going off the immediate, specific, subtopic. Please do not over-step your time limit. Un-moderated Caucus: This is essentially an informal discussion amongst delegates and has no procedural rules. Delegates generally use it to formulate directives or resolutions. It must be motioned for, and it also requires a purpose and a specific time. Suspension or Adjournment of Session: When the floor is open, a delegate may move to suspend or adjourn the meeting. If such a motion is in order, it requires a majority to pass. A motion to adjourn the meeting shall only be in order once three- quarters of the time allotted for the last meeting of the committee has lapsed. Postponement or Resumption of Debate: When the floor is open, a delegate may move to postpone debate on particular resolution or amendment currently on the floor. The motion requires a two-thirds majority vote for its passage, and at the MUN is only valid once two thirds of the allotted committee session time has elapsed. Reconsideration: A motion to reconsider is in order when an amendment or resolution has been adopted or rejected and must be made by a member who voted with the majority. The Moderator will recognize two speakers against this motion, after which it is put to immediate vote. A two-thirds majority of the members present and voting is required for reconsideration.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 13 Closure of Debate: When the floor is open a delegate may move to close debate on a substantive or procedural matter under discussion. When closure of debate is motioned for, the Moderator will recognize two speakers against the motion. No speakers in favour of the motion shall be heard. If the committee is in favour of closure, the Moderator will declare the closure of debate, and the resolution or amendment being debated will be put to immediate vote.
COMPETENCE: Question of competence are limited to questioning whether the committee has appropriate jurisdiction to discuss a substantive issue. A motion to question the competence of the committee to discuss a substantive issue is in order only immediately after that substantive document has been introduced. The motion requires a majority to pass and is debatable to the extent of one speaker for and one against. Question of competence of a committee to discuss an approved topic area is out of order.
TABLING A motion to table refers to one that allows the working paper at hand to be instantly failed, however at the discretion of the chair there shall be a one for speaker and one against speaker if the working paper/communiqu is considered exceptionally controversial. Tabling requires a two-thirds majority.
RECESS A motion to recess will be considered if there is approximately 15 minutes left to the end of the committee and the committee has considered the most obvious and important topic they have at hand. A motion to adjourn will only be considered 15 minutes prior to the scheduled end of the final session of committee or if every topic on the agenda has been considered.
ADDRESSING THE COMMITTEE At no point in procedure may a delegate address committee without the permission of the chair. If a delegate does so he will be immediately called to order.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 14 RIGHT TO REPLY If a delegate feels that their personal sentiments have been hurt he may ask for a right to reply. If the chair feels it appropriate the delegate may address committee for 45 seconds in reference to the insult and request a written apology.
PARLIAMENTARY POINTS a) Point of Order A point of order can be raised when a delegate makes either a factual or procedural inaccuracy while speaking. This cannot interrupt a speaker. A delegation rising to a point of order may not speak on the substance of the matter under discussion. The Chair may refuse to recognize a point of order if the delegation has not shown proper restraint and decorum governing the use of such a right, or if the point is dilatory in nature. A delegate raising a point of order must abide by the following format: "The delegate of ______________ (delegate who has made a factual error) said _______________(quote the factually incorrect words), however in reality_________________(provide the factually correct information)."
b) Point of Personal Privilege During the discussion of any matter, a delegation may rise to a point of personal privilege, and the point of personal privilege shall be immediately addressed by the Chair. A point of personal privilege can be used to interrupt a speaker, but the point must refer to the delegates personal comfort (e.g. cannot hear, too hot) and not to personal insult.
c) Point of Parliamentary Inquiry A point of parliamentary inquiry is a request for clarification of the rules of procedure. Points of parliamentary inquiry may not interrupt a speaker.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS A proposed draft working paper can be submitted to the chair at any time along with any amendments for approval prior to proposing it. A delegate may motion to approach the chair. If this is accepted by the chair, the delegate can approach the dais and show his working paper. A delegate can then motion to introduce his directive/communiqu/resolution/working paper.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 15 WITHDRAWL OF PROPOSALS A delegation may withdraw sponsorship of a resolution or amendment at any time before voting has commenced. Such desires to withdraw sponsorship must be submitted to the dais in writing. If sponsorship falls below the required number of two sponsors, the proposal shall be considered withdrawn from debate. A proposal that is withdrawn may be introduced.
PREFACE: If a delegate wishes to provide the committee with a small introduction to his directive/communiqu he may propose one with which may be passed by the discretion of the chair.
AMENDMENTS Amendments, which correct matters such as spelling, format or grammar, need not be voted upon and will be passed by the discretion of the chair. Amendments can be made to directives, resolutions, directives and communiqus if they are submitted to the chair first, approved by the chair, and then proposed in that order. Friendly Amendments-These do not require to be voted upon but can be included in the paper work if approved by the sponsors. Unfriendly Amendments-These are to be debated upon and passed with a simple majority.
QUESTION-ANSWER SESSIONS Immediately following the introduction of a draft resolution/directive, any delegate other than a sponsor may move for a question-answer session. When making the motion, the delegate must specify the length for the question and answer period and a limit to the speaking time. The Chair may accept or refuse this motion at their discretion; this decision is not subject to appeal. If accepted, this motion requires a simple majority to pass, and delegates will be recognized by the Chair to ask questions to sponsors pertaining specifically to the draft resolution in question. Once the question has been posed, one sponsor may respond to the question within the speaking time. This pattern shall continue until either the time allotted for the question and answer period has elapsed or if no more delegates wish to raise questions.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 16 VOTING: During voting procedure, only a yes/for or no/against votes will be around with abstains and rights only being considered during formal voting procedure, such as for a directive/communiqu but not for procedural voting. There are two types of a vote: Roll Call Vote: On a substantive matter, any member of the body may request a roll call vote, the granting of which is at the Chairs discretion and cannot be appealed. The roll shall be done alphabetically, either from the beginning of the alphabet or from a randomly chosen letter. Pass: During a roll call vote, a delegate may pass, in which case he or she will be placed at the end of the voting roll. However, a delegate may only vote in the affirmative or negative only; abstentions are not in order for passed votes. Rights of Explanation: During a roll-call vote, members may request a right of explanation by responding yes, with rights or no, with rights. At the end of the roll, all members who had voted with rights will be given the opportunity to explain their decision, if their decision was unexpected. The Chair may impose a time limit upon such explanations. NOTE: Voting with rights is to be used ONLY if your vote goes against an important country policy. For example-If Pakistan votes for a resolution which states that it will withdraw troops from PoK, can it vote yes with rights because this goes against its regular policies. However if Pakistan votes against a resolution that allows foreign intervention in Syria, Pakistan should not vote with rights because this is its regular foreign policy.
DIVIDING THE QUESTION If a resolution/working paper has clauses that require to be voted upon separately by the sponsors, they can motion to divide the question. A simple majority to pass each clause is required. This is entertained after all amendments have been introduced and voted upon. The chair will rank the clause in the order of most-least destructive.
ORDER OF PRECEDENCE Order of precedence refers to the order in which the given motions (if raised by delegates at the same time) will be voted upon by the committee. 1. Parliamentary Points Points that may interrupt a Speaker: Point of Order
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 17 Point of Personal Privilege Points that are in order when the floor is Open: Right of Reply Point of Parliamentary Inquiry
2. Non-debatable Procedural Motions Time Limit on Speeches Censure Un-moderated Caucus Moderated Caucus Adjournment of the Meeting
3. Other Procedural Motions During debate: Closure of Debate Tabling of Topic Question of Competence
After the closure of debate: Division of the Question Important Question
4. Substantive Motions Introducing any paper work Introducing Amendments
RESOLUTIONS On Resolution Writing: Before it is formally introduced to the committee, a resolution is referred to as a Draft Resolution. The Director of your committee would like all drafts to deal with ideas and opinions presented in directives and existing resolutions, as well as new ideas and innovations. Remember, a final resolution has to present a well thought out, feasible solution that will solve the crisis at hand. Your draft resolution should present the same logical flow that will be present in the final resolution. A sample resolution is presented later in this conference handbook.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 18 A draft resolution needs three things before it can be introduced to the floor. First, it needs the signatures (but not approval) of at least 1/5th of the total members to that committee. A word about signing being a signatory in no way signifies approval for that resolution, you are not bound to vote for or against a resolution just by being a signatory. Being a signatory merely implies that you feel that this resolution should be introduced to formal debate. You are signing to introduce a resolution to debate no more, no less. Secondly, a resolution needs to present a logical, simple and above all feasible solution to the situation at hand. If your Director (Moderator or Assistant Director) feels that the solution presented in the resolution is unworkable, he/she will refuse to introduce it to committee. At AKAHMUN, we work on the principle of one final resolution, and so the draft resolution has to be extensive enough to cover the entire topic area. Thirdly, a resolution needs sponsors and who are willing to amend and emend (correct grammatical errors), the resolution until it suits everybody else, without compromising the meaning or original premises of the resolution. Amending a resolution is just like writing the resolution itself. Your amendment has to be presented in resolution format, and along with it you should submit a short note specifying which parts of the resolution you wish to amend, and amendments as a cause of your amendment (renumbering, change of tense, etc.) Since, at AKAHMUN, there is only one final resolution, if a resolution passes, all others will have failed automatically. Voting proceeds in three rounds in the first of which you can ask for voting rights which implies that between the second and third rounds you may express your reasons for changing your vote. If you choose to change your vote in the second round, your rights are null and void. The first two rounds proceed in alphabetical order by roll call and the last by show of placards.
RESOLUTION FORMAT: Headings: The title should be centered, and can be as simple as Draft Resolution. Other headings include Committee and Topic Area, both of which should be left aligned and presented below the title.
Body: The resolution is technically a long sentence, with the following rules: a) The resolution begins with your committee name (look to example). b) The next section consists of Pre-ambulatory Clauses that describe the problem being addressed. Pre-ambulatory clauses should include references to past action taken, history of the problem and should offer support to the purpose of the resolution. Each clause should begin with an underlined phrase and end with a comma (,).
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 19 c) Operative clauses are numbered and state action to be taken by the committee. These clauses begin with present tense active verbs, which are generally stronger words than those used in the preamble. Each operative clause is followed by a semicolon (;), except for the last which ends with a period/full stop (.).
SAMPLE RESOLUTION Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4385th meeting, on 28 September 2001 The Security Council, Reaffirming its resolutions 1269 (1999) of 19 October 1999 and 1368 (2001) of 12 September 2001, Reaffirming also its unequivocal condemnation of the terrorist attacks which took place in New York, Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania on 11 September 2001, and expressing its determination to prevent all such acts, Reaffirming further that such acts, like any act of international terrorism, constitute a threat to international peace and security, Reaffirming the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence as recognized by the Charter of the United Nations as reiterated in resolution 1368 (2001), Reaffirming the need to combat by all means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts, Deeply concerned by the increase, in various regions of the world, of acts of terrorism motivated by intolerance or extremism, Calling on States to work together urgently to prevent and suppress terrorist acts, including through increased cooperation and full implementation of the relevant international conventions relating to terrorism, Recognizing the need for States to complement international cooperation by taking additional measures to prevent and suppress, in their territories through all lawful means, the financing and preparation of any acts of terrorism, Reaffirming the principle established by the General Assembly in its declaration of October 1970 (resolution 2625 (XXV)) and reiterated by the Security Council in its resolution 1189 (1998) of 13 August 1998, namely that every State has the duty to refrain from organizing, instigating, assisting or participating in terrorist acts in another State or acquiescing in organized activities within its territory directed towards the commission of such acts, Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations,
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 20 1. Decides that all States shall: (a) Prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts; (b) Criminalize the willful provision or collection, by any means, directly or indirectly, of funds by their nationals or in their territories with the intention that the funds should be used, or in the knowledge that they are to be used, in order to carry out terrorist acts; (c) Freeze without delay funds and other financial assets or economic resources of persons who commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist acts or participate in or facilitate the commission of terrorist acts; of entities owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons; and of persons and entities acting on behalf of, or at the direction of such persons and entities, including funds derived or generated from property owned or controlled directly or indirectly by such persons and associated persons and entities; (d) Prohibit their nationals or any persons and entities within their territories from making any funds, financial assets or economic resources or financial or other related services available, directly or indirectly, for the benefit of persons who commit or attempt to commit or facilitate or participate in the commission of terrorist acts, of entities owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by such persons and of persons and entities acting on behalf of or at the direction of such persons; 2. Decides also that all States shall: (a) Refrain from providing any form of support, active or passive, to entities or persons involved in terrorist acts, including by suppressing recruitment of members of terrorist groups and eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists; (b) Take the necessary steps to prevent the commission of terrorist acts, including by provision of early warning to other States by exchange of information; (c) Deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support, or commit terrorist acts, or provide safe havens; (d) Prevent those who finance, plan, facilitate or commit terrorist acts from using their respective territories for those purposes against other States or their citizens; (e) Ensure that any person who participates in the financing, planning, preparation or perpetration of terrorist acts or in supporting terrorist acts is brought to justice and ensure that, in addition to any other measures against them, such terrorist acts are established as serious criminal offences in domestic laws and regulations and that the punishment duly reflects the seriousness of such terrorist acts; (f) Afford one another the greatest measure of assistance in connection with criminal investigations or criminal proceedings relating to the financing or support of terrorist acts, including assistance in obtaining evidence in their possession necessary for the proceedings;
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 21 (g) Prevent the movement of terrorists or terrorist groups by effective border controls and controls on issuance of identity papers and travel documents, and through measures for preventing counterfeiting, forgery or fraudulent use of identity papers and travel documents; 3. Calls upon all States to: (a) Find ways of intensifying and accelerating the exchange of operational information, especially regarding actions or movements of terrorist persons or networks; forged or falsified travel documents; traffic in arms, explosives or sensitive materials; use of communications technologies by terrorist groups; and the threat posed by the possession of weapons of mass destruction by terrorist groups; (b) Exchange information in accordance with international and domestic law and cooperate on administrative and judicial matters to prevent the commission of terrorist acts; (c) Cooperate, particularly through bilateral and multilateral arrangements and agreements, to prevent and suppress terrorist attacks and take action against perpetrators of such acts; (d) Become parties as soon as possible to the relevant international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism, including the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism of 9 December 1999; (e) Increase cooperation and fully implement the relevant international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism and Security Council resolutions 1269 (1999) and 1368 (2001); (f) Take appropriate measures in conformity with the relevant provisions of national and international law, including international standards of human rights, before granting refugee status, for the purpose of ensuring that the asylum seeker has not planned, facilitated or participated in the commission of terrorist acts; (g) Ensure, in conformity with international law, that refugee status is not abused by the perpetrators, organizers or facilitators of terrorist acts, and that claims of political motivation are not recognized as grounds for refusing requests for the extradition of alleged terrorists; 4. Notes with concern the close connection between international terrorism and transnational organized crime, illicit drugs, money-laundering, illegal arms-trafficking, and illegal movement of nuclear, chemical, biological and other potentially deadly materials, and in this regard emphasizes the need to enhance coordination of efforts on national, subregional, regional and international levels in order to strengthen a global response to this serious challenge and threat to international security;
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 22 5. Declares that acts, methods, and practices of terrorism are contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations and that knowingly financing, planning and inciting terrorist acts are also contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations; 6. Decides to establish, in accordance with rule 28 of its provisional rules of procedure, a Committee of the Security Council, consisting of all the members of the Council, to monitor implementation of this resolution, with the assistance of appropriate expertise, and calls upon all States to report to the Committee, no later than 90 days from the date of adoption of this resolution and thereafter according to a timetable to be proposed by the Committee, on the steps they have taken to implement this resolution; 7. Directs the Committee to delineate its tasks, submit a work programme within 30 days of the adoption of this resolution, and to consider the support it requires, in consultation with the Secretary-General; 8. Expresses its determination to take all necessary steps in order to ensure the full implementation of this resolution, in accordance with its responsibilities under the Charter; 9. Decides to remain seized of this matter. Note: The word 'Security Council' will be replaced by either 'Historic Conference of Leaders' or 'Contemporary Conference of Leaders' for the purpose of the respective committee.
Affirming Alarmed by Approving Aware of Bearing in mind Believing Confident Contemplating Convinced Declaring Deeply concerned Deeply conscious Deeply convinced Deeply disturbed Deeply regretting Desiring Emphasizing
Expecting Expressing its appreciation Expressing its satisfaction Fulfilling Fully alarmed Fully aware Fully believing Further deploring Further recalling Guided by Having adopted Having considered Having considered further Having devoted attention Having examined Having heard Having received Welcoming
Having studied Keeping in mind Noting with regret Noting with deep concern Noting with satisfaction Noting further Noting with approval Observing Reaffirming Realizing Recalling Recognizing Referring Seeking Taking into account Taking into consideration Taking note Viewing with appreciation
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 24
Operative Phrases
Accepts Affirms Approves Authorizes Calls Calls upon Condemns Confirms Congratulates Considers Declares accordingly Deplores Designates Draws the attention Emphasizes Encourages Endorses Expresses its appreciation Expresses its hope Further invites Deplores Designates Draws the attention Emphasizes Encourages Endorses Expresses its appreciation Expresses its hope Further invites Further proclaims Further reminds Further recommends Further requests Further resolves Has resolved Notes Proclaims Reaffirms Recommends Regrets Reminds Requests Solemnly affirms Strongly condemns Supports Takes note of Transmits Trusts
Position Papers
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 25 Delegates have to prepare a Position Paper, which summarizes their character's stand on the issue being discussed. This must be submitted by 8 th November, 2013. Delegates can submit their position papers to their committee Director on the MUN email id. Please see the study guide or contact the committee Director for further details. A sample position paper has been provided below:
Committee: The Historic Security Council Country: Democratic Republic of Vietnam Delegate: Alisha Sonawalla
Summary of the Problem The people of Vietnam had suffered for decades under the rule of the French and the J apanese, with the sheer hope to gain liberation from these two forces that colonized their country. It was in 1941 that they saw Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh emerge as the pioneer of the revolution as he established the Viet Minh. The allied forces were able to defeat J apan in World War II with the help of the intelligence from Democratic Republic of Vietnam, however still USA refused to recognize Minhs new government and instead supported the French for the fear of the spread of communism. In the 1950s Ho Chi Minh finally defeated the French with the help of the Peoples Republic of China and the Soviet Union, and the people of Vietnam thought they had finally achieved freedom. It was in the Geneva conference of 1954 that Vietnam would be temporarily divided along the 17 th Parallel and the people were promised that free elections would take place for the unification of Vietnam. However the people were betrayed and elections did not take place resulting in the formation of the Viet Cong, which opposed the Diem controlled South Vietnam and were supporters of Ho Chi Minh clearly defining the will of the people. Seeing the Democratic Republic of Vietnam rise above South Vietnam, the USA chose to get involved in the conflict not because they supported South Vietnam, but for the fear of the spread of communism. The USA slowly took control of South Vietnam with the execution of Diem in 1963 and waited for a chance to do the same with North Vietnam, in order to establish their capitalistic dominance. On August 2 nd 1964, it was suspected that North Vietnam had fired upon the USS Maddox, and USA took this as an opportunity to attack the North. Currently the USA has executed three bombing operations on North Vietnam, killing thousands of people, just to contain communism.
Policies
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 26 What makes a country are not its borders, nor its government, and definitely not its army, but the people that call it home. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam follows one simple policy: the freedom of the people. Our goal is a peaceful reunification of Vietnam and the happiness of the people something the great Leader Ho Chi Minh has fought for his entire life. But we are disgusted by the actions of the United States of America for they forget how we helped them defeat J apan, and choose to establish their dominance over doing what is right. They do not notice that while they strictly abide by their policy to contain communism, they ironically deviate from the very essence of their democratic government the will of the people. All we do is ask a simple question when the people themselves support Ho Chi Minhs ideology, why should a government enforce a democracy against their will? The hypocrisy and inhuman behavior of the USA has left us no choice but to fight for our freedom. Nothing is more precious than independence and liberty says Ho Chi Minh. It is foolish to think that USA and the South Vietnamese leaders are acting in favor of the people since they have refused to allow a plebiscite to unite Vietnam they feared that the will of the people will prevail. With all of North Vietnam, and over a 150,000 South Vietnamese wanting to abolish the US presence in the state, President J ohnson is desperate to maintain his dominance. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam considers the military actions of the United States and other foreign forces a multilateral invasion and therefore under Chapter VII Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, North Vietnam is going to legally use military power as protection. The Democratic Republic of Vietnam simply wants the United States of America to leave Vietnam and no other foreign presence should affect the future of this nation. We wish to be able to decide our future without foreign assistance, and have a peaceful and fair plebiscite regarding the unification of Vietnam, supervised by a local committee. The united nation of Vietnam must be lead by the great leader Ho Chi Minh and his government who actually care for the future of the Vietnamese people. Solution The Democratic Republic of Vietnam proposes the following solution: 1. Calls for the immediate withdrawal of all USA, Australian, New Zealand, South Korean, and Phillipenian troops from the Vietnamese land and Vietnamese waters, as they are hindering with the peaceful lifestyle of the Vietnamese people and are the cause of unnecessary conflict; 2. Emphasizes the need for free elections that must be held for the unification of Vietnam which will be monitored by a local committee in order to officially and clearly project
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 27 the will of the Vietnamese people in a statistical manner and to insure that the future of the nation is in the best interest of the people; 3. Further recommends the gradual disarmament of the Viet Cong, once all foreign troops depart, to ensure peace in the region for which in return the local authorities guarantee the protection of the members of the Viet Cong; 4. Further Requests the United States of America to provide compensation in the form of capital aid for the damage it has caused to the nation of Vietnam through its military action, which will be used for the economical development of Vietnam as well as the benefit of the people; 5. Urges for the simultaneous release of American and Vietnamese Prisoners of War upon the departure of foreign troops in order to eliminate all potential reasons for a future conflict between the countries; 6. Emphasizes the need for all countries in this committee to respect the communist government of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and to recognize the Democratic Republic of Vietnam as an independent and sovereign country; 7. Trusts the nations in this committee to provide capital aid for the development of the united nation of Vietnam. Conclusion As the great leader Ho Chi Minh has aptly stated, there are more who wish to be under the guidance of Minhs government than those who side with the so called democracy. Our only motive is to give the people of Vietnam what they truly want a communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam and by doing that we are giving them pure freedom. We will not let the unjust actions of the USA hinder our peoples and our great countrys future.
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 28
Helpful Sources for Research
AKAHMUN | Conference Handbook 29
Contact Information
Secretariat akahmun@akahyd.org
Model UN Coordinator rajesh.kayiprath@agakhanacademies.org