FOUNDATION ON ROCK

1. Introduction
1.1 Type of Foundation on Rock
1.2 Input Parameter For Bearing Capacity Calculation
1.3 Loadings From Upper Structures Analysis For Foundation
2. Shallow Foundation
2.1 Bearing capacity
- Strength Properties Based on Rock Mass Classification System (
RMR)
- Hoek And Brown Bearing Capacity
- Empirical Formula
2.2Stability Of Shallow Foundation
- Under Vertical Load
- Under Vertical, Horizontal And Moment Load
3 Deep Foundation
3.1 Bearing Capacity
3.1.1 Piles on intact ( unweathered ) rocks.
3.1.2 Piles on weathered rocks.
3.2Stability Of Deep Foundation
- Single Pile
- Piles In Group
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Type of foundation on rock
Foundations may rests on soil or rock, it can be shallow ( footing foundation) or
deep foundations ( pile foundation ), deep foundation might be in single pile or
pile in group.
In this chapter, the description is focused on foundation on rock. Two types of
rock foundation each requiring different design procedures, are illustrated in fig.1
. the upper photograph shows spread footings for a cut and cover structure
founded on an interbedded sequence of very weak sandstone and shale. With
each footing surrounded by a considerable extent of intact rock, the primary
design task for these foundation is determination of the allowable bearing
pressure and the magnitude of the settlement. The lower photograph shows a
bridge foundation located near the crest of vertical slope of a very strong granite.
The rock has adequate bearing capacity for the applied loads and settlement will
be elastic and negligible. Therefore, the primary design task is to ensure that
blocks of rock in the foundation formed by continuous joints are stable against
toppling and sliding.
fig.1 Shallow foundation on rock
The design of footing on rock encompass the following three tasks that examine
different aspects of foundation performance :
1. The bearing capacity of the rock to ensure that there will be no crushing or
creep of the material within the loaded zone.
2. Settlement of the foundation which will result from both elastic and
inelastic strain of the rock, and possibly compression of weak seams
within the volume of rock compressed by the applied load.
3. Stability of the footing by examination of sliding and shear failure of blocks
of the rock formed by intersecting discontinuity within the foundation.
The performance of a foundation must be checked with respect to all three of
this conditions because they are independent of each other.
1.2 Input parameter for bearing capacity calculation
Bearing capacity ( BC) is a capacity and capability of soil or rock and foundation
either shallow or deep foundation to retain loading from upper structure.
The upper structure can be bridge, tower, building or any structure which resting
on the foundation.
In design and analysis of foundation, three steps as mentioned above should be
performed, in order to calculate bearing capacity, some aspects should be taken
into account.
Bearing capacity can be obtained from site investigation to the area of soil or
rock where any structure will be built resulting in some parameters.
1. BC from building code
BC taken from this method is very rough value, only recommended when
site investigation data not available.
2. BC from the measurement of particular parameter in in-situ test and
laboratory test.
1.3 Loadings From Upper Structures Analysis For Foundation
The figure 2 shows how the load is transferred into the rock, the loading from
upper structure ( dead load and live load ) is collected in the column of the
building, at the same time the column is attached to the top part of the foundation
then the loading is given by the foundation to the soil / rock resulting in a system
of equilibrium.
2. SHALOW FOUNDATION
2.1 Bearing capacity
The usual method of determining allowable bearing pressures is to use published
tables or building codes relating allowable values to rock type. However, in a
circumstances where the rock conditions do not match description on the building
code, it is more appropriate to use limit equilibrium or numerical methods
incorporating appropriate rock mass strength parameters.
Most of the foundations lay on the following geological conditions :
1. Fractured and weathered rock
2. Shallow dipping bedding plane
3. layered formation
4. karstic formation.
To calculate bearing capacity of footing, the geological condition should be
determined in advance to select the appropriate bearing capacity formulation.
1. BC using building code.
The allowable bearing pressure for three classes of rock ( soft rock, medium rock
and hard rock ) can be used using building code as shown in the fig.3
High rise building
Soil / rock
Foundation
Fig.2 Transfer of loading to the soil
fig.3 BC from building code
The effect of fractured intensity on bearing capacity of the above rock types can
be estimated from RQD of drill core as follow :
a) RQD > 90 % : no reduction
b) 50 %< RQD < 90 % reduced BC by factor of about 0.25 0.7
c) RQD < 50 % reduced BC by a factor of about 0.25 0.1 ; reduce BC further if
extensive clay seams present.
Fig . 4 Allowable bearing pressure for intact rock
2. BC of fractured rock ( Hoek and Brown formula )
- Compressive strength of fractured rock
Fractured rock will of course have a much lower compressive strength than intact
rock.
A strength criterion
Has been developed by Hoek and Brown :
2 / 1 2
) ( 3 ) ( 3 1
) ' ( ' '
r u r u
s m
Where :
'
1
Maximum principal effective stress
'
3
minimum principal stress or confining stress

) (r u
uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock
m and s dimensionless constant from the table 1 Hoek and Brown
Table 1 : Rock mass quality vs material constant
The typical shape of the strength envelope defined by equation above, is shown
in the figure 5 . The steep gradient of this curve clearly demonstrates that
increasing confining pressure has a significant effect on improving the strength
and bearing capacity of the rock.
Fig 5 Strength of fractured rock
The formula of allowable BC using Hoek and Brown expression :
SF
ms s Cf
q
r u
a
] ) 1 ( 1 [
2 / 1 2 / 1
) (
2 / 1
1

Where : Cf
1
= correction factor for foundation shape shown in the table 2.
SF = safety factor 2 3
m and s = material factor of discontinuity
) (r u
= uniaxial compressive strength
In the case of footing which recessed into the rock surface, it is necessary to
modify equation above to account for the increase in the stress as a results of
confining stress applied at the ground surface.
The modified value of allowable bearing pressure is as follows :
SF
C
q
f
a
] ) s m [(
3
2 / 1
u(r)
2
3 u(r) 1

Where :
s s
q q
2 / 1
u(r)
2
u(r) 3
) s m (
table 2 shape factor
3. BC from Bell
For weak rock with little fracturing , Bell provide the formula which utilizes the
bearing capacity factor Nc Nq N

described in the fig 6

SF
DN N B C
q
q f
a

) 2 / ( C cNc
f2 1
Where :
Nc = 2 N

1/2
(N

+1)
Nq = N

2
N

= 0.5 N

1/2
(N

2
1 )
N

= tan
2
(45 + 2 / )
BC of shallow dipping bedded formations
) 1 )(
tan
(
tan 2
2
2
2
2
1
3

N
c
N
B
A
SF
N c N
q
A
a
)] 1 )( tan / ( [
1 1 1 1 3

N
1
= tan
2
(45 + 2 /
1
)
N
2
= tan
2
(45 + 2 /
2
)
fig.6 BC factors
If the rock surface around the footing is subjected to a surcharge pressure q
s ,
as
might be the case if the footing were recessed into the ground surface, then the
BC is increase due to the confinement provided to the passive wedge.
) 1 )(
tan
( )
tan 2
(
2
2
2
2
1
3

N
c
N
B
q
s A
Example 1
Consider a 2 m wide strip footing bearing on the surface of a fair quality
limestone in which the average discontinuity spacing is 400 mm and contain
some clay. The strength properties of rock are as follows :
1. Unconfined compressive strength of intact rock,
) (r u
= 75 MPa
2. Curve strength envelope parameter m=0.128 and s = 0.00009
3. Rock density = 0.022 MN/m
3
For a strip footing, the correction shape factor Cf1 and Cf2 = 1.
a. Building code
From the table 5.1 and 5.2 a bearing capacity of about 1 2 MPa can be
interpreted for rock which is moderately strong and has a moderate discontinuity
spacing
b. Hoek and Brown
using the formula :
qa = 1.14 Mpa
c. Bell solution
Bell solution needs c and of rock mass. For an average pressure on the
foundation = 2 MPa , the instantaneous values for c and are 0.54 and 25
o
respectively. Then N

= 2.47
Nc = 10.92 and N = 4.01.
Assuming strip foundation of width 2 m and SF = 3, q
a
=
3
0 09 . 0 9 . 5
= 2 MPa.
2.2 Stability of shallow foundation
To control the structure is safe under such loading, the stability analysis is
performed by comparison between the loading from upper structure with
allowable bearing capacity.
The allowable bearing capacity is ultimate bearing capacity divided by safety
factor.
q
all
= q
ult
/ SF
the value of SF is recommended 2 3 depends on standard requirement.
1. Stability Under Vertical Load
Fig.8
Fig.7 Stability under V Loading only
V
Column
Footing
Rock
The structure is safe when
all
q
A
V

Where : V = vertical load, A contact area between footing and rock

q
all
= allowable bearing capacity
2. Stability Under Vertical, Horizontal And Moment Load
Fig.8 Stability under VHM Loading
Under this circumstances, 2 analysis should be performed.
1. Stability under horizontal load
hor
ad
SF
H
A c V

tan
2. Stability under moment load
t
all
I
My
A
V
q
I
My
A
V


V
H
M
DEEP FOUNDATION
3.1 BEARING CAPACITY
Piles foundation on rock consist of :
a. Bored and rock socketed pile
b. Piles driven to rock
Rocks may be either unweathered and intact or may be in weathered state, pile
design criteria will be different for both two rock conditions.
3.1.1 Piles on intact ( unweathered ) rocks.
As shown in the figure 9 , two types of piles are generally installed on rock.
The measurement of bearing capacity can be based on RQD value and
properties of rock cores.
fig 9 type of pile foundation on rock
a. Allowable BC based on RQD value.
The table 3 can be used to obtain q
a
, for this contact pressure, the settlement
of foundation should not exceed 0.5 in ( 12.5 mm ).
table 3 Allowable contact pressure
b. Allowable BC based on properties of rock cores.
The q
a
for cast in place or rock socketed piles in rock can be evaluated by
relating it to rock core strength as given by equation :
d K q q
sp core u a
) (
Where :
(q
u
)
core
= average unconfined compressive strength
K
sp
= empirical factor given in figure
d = depth factor given by equation
2 )] / ( 2 . 0 8 . 0 [ B L d
s
L
s
= pile length that is socketed in rock having a strength q
u
and B is diameter of
pile
S
d
= spacing of discontinuity
t
d
= thickness of discontinuity
fig 10 value for K
sp
c. Allowable BC derived from the bond between rock and concrete
Q
all
= p L
s
C
bs
p = pile perimeter ( = B for circular pile )
L
s
= socketed pile length in the rock
C
bs
= allowable bond strength between concrete and rock.
table 4 allowable strength of skin friction and end bearing
3.1.2 Piles on weathered rocks.
Weathered rocks exhibit a great variety of physical properties. In situations where
weathering is extensive and rock fragments are surrounded by decomposed soil,
the foundation should be designed as if supported on soil matrix.
3.2 STABILITY OF DEEP FOUNDATION
a. Single Pile
The control to stability either shallow or deep foundation is defined as a
comparison of
strength of rock and foundations against service load multiplied by Safety factor.
Under simple condition single pile with vertical load, the control of pile stability is :
SF
Q
V
ult

where Q
ult
= Capacity of single pile under vertical load
b. Piles In Group
The control of pile stability in group requires complex analysis, will be described
in the next subject.
Example :
A 36 in ( 900 mm ) diameter drilled pile is supported on unweathered rock by
socketting 6 ft into it. The rock was sandstone with q
u
core of 90 t/ft
2
. Estimate
the allowable BC of the pile.
Solution:
a) Allowable BC from table :
For group c in table presumed allowable BC for medium to high sandstone is
10 to 40 t/ft
2
( 1000 to 4000 kN/m
2
)
b) Allowable BC From properties of rock
Ls = 6 ft ; B = 3 ft ; d = 0.8 + 0.2( 6/3 ) = 1.2
In the absence of information on sizes and spacing of discontinuities, assume
K
sp
= 0.3 from figure , then from equation
q
a
= ( q
u
)
core
K
sp
d
= 90 x 0.3 x 1.2 t/ft
2
= 32 t/ft
2
c) Allowable BC derived from the bond between rock and concrete
Q
v(all)
= p L
s
C
bs
The value for a allowable bond stress C
bs
is not available for unweathered
Sandstone and the pile material ( concrete ). A conservative value of 4.5 t/ft
2
Can be estimated from table.
C
bs
= 4.5 t/ft
2
; p = x B ; L
s
= 6 ft
Q
v(all)
= p L
s
C
bs
= x 3 x 6 x 4.5 = ; q
all
= Q
v(all)
/ Area
q
all
= 36 t / ft
2
From the case b and c , the lower value of allowable BC = 32 t/ft
2
can be
obtained.