Professional Documents
Culture Documents
=
=
) ( ) (
) ( ) (
'
2
'
1
2 1
s y s y
s y s y
(7)
(8)
By combining (.ch(s) (7) - sh(s) (8)) and for F
p
=F
B
-F
E
,
we obtain:
t
E E B
F K
F y K K K F K
A
.
). ( .
4
3 2 1 1
2
+
=
Where:
By combining (.sh(s) (7) - ch(s) (8)) we obtain:
t
E E B
F K
F y K K K F K
B
.
). ( .
8
7 6 5 5
2
+
=
Where:
For x=s+m we have :
E
y m s x y = + = ) (
2
We deduce that :
Who gives :
From equation (4) we fnd :
By taking:
) (
9 p B
S S Q K + =
IJRMET VOL. 2, ISSUE 1, APRIL 2012 ISSN : 2249-5762 (Online) | ISSN : 2249-5770 (Print)
www. i j r me t . c o m
42 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
We obtain :
By using equation (3) and taking:
An equation in (s) is fnally obtained:
0 .
) (
4
) (
3
) (
2
) ( ) (
1
. =
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
+
+
+ +
t
F
s f
t
F
s f s f
E
F m s s f s
The last equation must be resolved to evaluate the unknown s,
then we deduce the values of loads (F
B
and MF
B
) applied on the
bolt.
The upper part is more resistant than the screw in bending, so
the screw head follows the motion part. This can be expressed
by equality of rotation angles:
(9)
This condition gives the expression of the bending moment applied to
the screw:
(10)
Where:
(11)
E
b
and I
b
are respectively the Youngs modulus and second
moment of the screw area.
III. 3D FE Simulations
Study case data are chosen as follows:
Dimensions (in mm): u=30, v=10, w=50, h=16, b=20, h
pm
=50,
d=10
Friction coeffcient: f = 0.2
Parts material (steel):
E=210000 MPa, =0.3
Bolt material (steel):
E=205000 MPa, =0.3
Three-dimensional fnite element model is built on the ANSYS
software for symmetric assembly (fg. 4).
The numerical computation is done in two steps:
A. Pretension Step
The assembly is not loaded. A pretension stress of 200 MP
a
is
applied on the bolt. Away from the edges, normal stress must be
the same along the screw (fg. 5).
B. Loading Step
The assembly is subjected to external loads: a vertical
force F
E
and another transverse force F
T
.
These forces are applied to the ends of assembled parts. The middle
part is taken as fxed support (fg. 6).
Fig. 4: 3D EF Model
Fig. 5: Normal Stress (Along Y) Under Preload of 200 MP
a
Fig. 6: Normal Stress (AlongY) Under External Loads (for
Example F
T
=5000 N and F
E
=80000N)
IV. Results Validation
In the numerical solution we read left and right normal
stresses on the screw area then we deduce maximum and
fatigue stresses. The analytical model is also able to calculate
the normal and alternating stresses for static and fatigue
dimensioning.
Results are plotted as load-stress curves of alternating and
maximum stresses (fg. 7 and fg. 8). Numerical results are issued
from ANSYS 3D FE simulations and analytical ones are calculated
by a C code program.
IJRMET VOL. 2, ISSUE 1, APRIL 2012 ISSN : 2249-5762 (Online) | ISSN : 2249-5770 (Print)
www. i j r me t . c o m
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY 43
Fig. 7: Fatigue Stresses in the Screw for F
T
=5000N: Comparison
of Numerical Model Results 3D EF/ Analytical Model
Fig. 8: Maximum Stresses in the Screw for F
T
=5000N: Comparison
of Numerical Model Results 3D EF/ Analytical Model
The two curves have the same shape and the results are coherent
and hence the developed analytical model is validated. Stresses
applied on the screw decrease slightly when shear load F
T
increase
(fg. 9). This result shows that shear loading has a little effect on
bolt stresses in comparison with those given by tensile loading.
Fig. 9: Stresses Variation with F
T
3D E Results
V. Interface Contact Evolution
The interface separation increases with tension load F
E
, which
reduces the contact area (fg. 10). So sliding under shear load F
T
becomes possible. Numerical simulations show that sliding at
the interface can be local without seeing the assembled part fully
moving (fg. 11). If there is a local sliding we can deduce that shear
stresses are relatively important and therefore contact pressure
is also important (fg. 12). A fully sliding can happen between
the assembled parts for appropriate values of tension load FE and
shear load F
T
. By plotting F
T
-F
E
curve for these appropriate values,
two zones are seen: an adhesion zone and another sliding one (fg.
13).
Fig. 10: Separation of Interface for F
T
=5000N and F
E
= 80000
N.
Fig. 11: Sliding Distance in the Contact Area for F
T
=6000 N and
F
E
=8500 N.
Fig. 12: Contact Pressure for F
T
=6000 N and F
E
=8500 N
Fig. 13: Adhesion / Sliding Limit
VI. Conclusion
The analytical model is presented to complete the analytical
one that was developed for highly eccentric tensile loaded bolted
joint. The new model takes into account a shear loading that can
lead to sliding in contact interface. Results validation is done by
comparing the screw stress values calculated through analytical
model to those issued from ANSYS FEA numerical simulation.
The developed model is favorable to compute this bolted joint
engineering problem without requiring a lot of time as the 3D-
FE simulations. For a given tensile loading, the increasing of shear
loading decreases the stress values in the bolt. Simulations have
shown that when external loads are applied, local sliding may
occur. A full sliding can happen for important loads. In this
case assembly is destabilized and the screw becomes subjected
to shear.
VII. References
[1] VDI 2230 BLATT 1, 2003 Systematische Berechnung
Hochbeanspruchter Schraubenver-bindungen Zylindrische
Ei nschraubenverbi ndungen, VDI Ri cht l i ni en,
ICS 21. 060. 10, VDI-Gesel l schaft Ent wi ckl ung
Konstruktion Vertrieb, Fachberuch Konstruktion, Ausschuss
Schraubenverbindungen (2003) 1-169.
[2] P. Agatonovic,"Beam model of bolted fanged connection
En. Comput", March 21, Vol. 2, Pineridge Press Ltd. 1985
pp. 21-29.
IJRMET VOL. 2, ISSUE 1, APRIL 2012 ISSN : 2249-5762 (Online) | ISSN : 2249-5770 (Print)
www. i j r me t . c o m
44 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
[3] Bulatovic, R., Jovanovic, J.,An analysis of the Mathematical
Models in Deformation Process of eccentrically Loaded
Bolts, Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 1(7), pp. 789-797,
2000.
[4] Guillot J.,Threaded elements connection; modeling and
calculation, Ed. Engineering techniques, Vol. 1, B5560 to
B5562, 75006, Paris, 1-56, 1987.
[5] Europan standard E25-030,"Fasterners. Threaded
connections. Design, calculation and mounting conditions,
AFNOR Publications, 2nd version, February, 1988.
[6] NF E27-009 norm (1979),"Fasteners Fatigue test under
axial load", AFNOR Publications, 1st Edition, October,
1-10.
[7] A. Daidi, J. Chakhari, A. Zghal,Numerical model for
bolted T-stubs with two bolt rows, Structural Engineering
and Mechanics, An International Journal, Vol 26, No.3, June
20, 2007, pp. 343-361.
[8] J. Chakhari, A. Daidi, Z. Chaib, J. Guillot,Numerical
model for two-bolted joints subjected to compressive
loading, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol 44,
no. 4, February 2008, pp 162-173.
[9] Sylvain Ruiz, Alain Daidie, Zouhair Chaib,Modlisation du
comportement dun axe viss charg par un effort transversal",
Conception et Production Intgres CPI2007, pp. 1 16.
[10] Rasmussen, J., Norgaard, I.B., Haastrup, O., Haastrup J.,A
two body contact problem with friction, Proceedings of
Euromech Colloquium, NR 110 Rimforsa, pp. 115-120,
1978
[11] Feras Alkatan, Pierre Stephan, Alain Daidie, Jean
Guillot,Equivalent stiffness of various components in bolted
joints subjected to axial loading, Finite Elements in Analysis
and Design, Vol. 43, 2007, pp. 589-598.
Mohamed Tahar Nasraoui received his
B.S. degree in Mechanical Construction
from ENSET, Tunis, Tunisia, in 1991,
and then the M.S. degree in Mechanical
Engineering in 1995. He was teaching
assistant in the mechanical department,
High Institute of Technological Studies,
Sousse, Tunisia, from 1995 to 1997. He
is technologist in the High Institute of
Technological Studies, Sfax, Tunisia,
from 1997. At present, he is engaged
in his PhD in ENIT, Tunis, Tunisia from
2008. His research interests include mechanical engineering,
structures and bolted joints.
Jamel Chakhari received his Engineer
degree in Mechanical Engineering from
ENIT, Tunis, Tunisia, in 1999, and the
Master degree from ENSICA Toulouse,
France, in 2001. He obtained his PhD
from INSA Toulouse, France, in 2007.
At present, he is an assistant professor
in the mechanical department of ENIT,
Tunisia.
Boubaker Khalf received his Engineer
degree in Mechanical Engineering from
ENIT, Tunis, Tunisia, in 1997, the M.S
degree from High School of Technology,
Montreal, in 2005. At present, he is
engaged in his PhD in Polytechnic
school of Montral- Canada.
Mustapha Nasri received his M.S. degree
in Applied Mechanics from FST, Tunis,
Tunisia, in 1980 and his Master degree in
1982. He obtained his PhD of specialty,
Applied Mechanics, in 1987 and then his
PhD of state in 2000 from FST Tunis. He
was teaching assistant in ISET Nabeul
from 1990 to 1992 and then assistant
professor in IPEI Tunis until 2000. At
present, he is associate professor in IPEI
Tunis. His research interests include
materials and tribology.