Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answers:
3) Management is both a science a science as well as an art. It is a science because it has an
organized body of knowledge consisting of theories and principles. It is an art because it
involves getting results through practical applications of skills and knowledge. The science of
management provides general principles for managing various aspects of business. But their
application depends upon the experience, skills and competence of managers. Thus both art
and science and complementary to each other as science teaches to know about the things and
art teaches how to perform those things in practical situations.
MANAGEMENT AS AN ART
1- Existence of theoretical knowledge: art presupposes the existence of certain theoretical
knowledge. Experts in their respective areas have derived certain basic principles which are
applicable to a particular form of art. 2- Personalized application: the use of basic knowledge
varies from individual to individual. 3- Based on practice and certainty: all art is practical. Art
involves the creative practice of theoretical knowledge.
MANAGEMENT AS A SCIENCE
1- Systematically body of knowledge: it's principles are based on a cause and effect relation. 2Principles based on implementation: scientific principles were first developed through
observation and then tested through repeated experimentation under controlled conditions. 3Universal validity: scientific principles have universal validity and application.
Management is an art because in management your task is to better manage human resources
and organizational matters in your circle of command & control.
It is science because your performance is measured and results are visible. For performance
there would be some system in vogue on the basis of which your Organization is assessed and
graded. So these all are scientific jobs that could be measured in quantitative formats.
So in my point of view Management is both a science and art.
8) The authors research started in 1977 when two groups of people at
McKinsey & Co. were asked to research a general concern with the
problems of management effectiveness and a particular concern with the
nature of the relationship between strategy, structure, and management
effectiveness. One of these groups was asked to review thinking on
strategy, the other was asked to review thinking on organisational
effectiveness. Peters and Waterman were the leaders of the project on
organisational effectiveness. They were basically told to travel
around the world and speak to as many interesting business people as
they could about the subject of Organisation, Structure and People.
They set out to discover the real secrets of management. They examined
43 successful American companies including IBM, Procter & Gamble,
Boeing, Delta Airlines and McDonalds. In their research they looked
for key attributes that most of these companies shared and that made
them successful. They were asked to do a 700 slide, two-day
presentation and then condense it down. When condensed their research
Step 3: Analyze the existing business process cycles & workflows and determine how they may be modified or
refined
Step 4: Apply IT to setup an optimal Business Information Management Architecture (BIMA) to support the
reengineered business process
Step 5: Modify or redesign the existing processes according to the reengineering strategies and develop refined
Business Process Automation Systems (BPAS)
Step 6: Apply IT strategies to map BIMA onto an Enterprise Information Management System (EIMS) that is
integrated across the enterprise and that fits into and supports the reengineered Business process cycles and
workflows.
Step 7: Integrate the EIMS with the BPAS to build up the completed reengineered business system
Step 8: Repeat steps 1-7 for continuous BPR due to changing customer demands, technology changes and business
strategies, which leads to business stability
Since information management is a key factor in BPR, the BPR efforts are enabled & supported by a variety of IT
solutions
Step #1
Criteria for Selecting Processes
Broken Process
Bottleneck and Delays
Cross-functional or cross-organizational units
Core processes that have high impacts
Front-line and customer serving (moment of truth)
Value-adding
New processes and services opportunity
Feasibility
Step #1
Process Data
Basic Overall process data
Customers and customer
requirements
Suppliers and suppliers
qualifications
Breakthrough goals
Performance characteristics
Cost
cycle time
Reliability
defect rate
Systems constraints
Budgetary
Business
Legal
social
environmental
safety issues
Step #6
Execute and Follow the Plan
Qualify/certify the process
Test periodically the process
Identify and eliminate emerging process problems
Evaluate the impact on the business on customers
Run periodically benchmarking tests for the process
11) McKinsey 7s model is a tool that analyzes firms organizational design by looking at 7 key internal
elements: strategy, structure, systems, shared values, style, staff and skills, in order to identify if they are
effectively aligned and allow organization to achieve its objectives.
The goal of the model was to show how 7 elements of the company: Structure, Strategy, Skills, Staff, Style,
Systems, and Shared values, can be aligned together to achieve effectiveness in a company. The key point of
the model is that all the seven areas are interconnected and a change in one area requires change in the rest
of a firm for it to function effectively.
Below you can find the McKinsey model, which represents the connections between seven areas and divides
them into Soft Ss and Hard Ss. The shape of the model emphasizes interconnectedness of the elements.
The model can be applied to many situations and is a valuable tool when organizational design is at question.
The most common uses of the framework are:
7s factors
In McKinsey model, the seven areas of organization are divided into the soft and hard areas. Strategy,
structure and systems are hard elements that are much easier to identify and manage when compared to soft
elements. On the other hand, soft areas, although harder to manage, are the foundation of the organization and
are more likely to create the sustained competitive advantage.
Hard Ss
Soft Ss
Strategy
Style
Structure
Staff
Systems
Skills
Shared Values
Strategy is a plan developed by a firm to achieve sustained competitive advantage and successfully compete
in the market. What does a well-aligned strategy mean in 7s McKinsey model? In general, a sound strategy is
the one thats clearly articulated, is long-term, helps to achieve competitive advantage and is reinforced by
strong vision, mission and values. But its hard to tell if such strategy is well-aligned with other elements when
analyzed alone. So the key in 7s model is not to look at your company to find the great strategy, structure,
systems and etc. but to look if its aligned with other elements. For example, short-term strategy is usually a
poor choice for a company but if its aligned with other 6 elements, then it may provide strong results.
Structure represents the way business divisions and units are organized and includes the information of who is
accountable to whom. In other words, structure is the organizational chart of the firm. It is also one of the most
visible and easy to change elements of the framework.
Systems are the processes and procedures of the company, which reveal business daily activities and how
decisions are made. Systems are the area of the firm that determines how business is done and it should be
the main focus for managers during organizational change.
Skills are the abilities that firms employees perform very well. They also include capabilities and competences.
During organizational change, the question often arises of what skills the company will really need to reinforce
its new strategy or new structure.
Staff element is concerned with what type and how many employees an organization will need and how they
will be recruited, trained, motivated and rewarded.
Style represents the way the company is managed by top-level managers, how they interact, what actions do
they take and their symbolic value. In other words, it is the management style of companys leaders.
Shared Values are at the core of McKinsey 7s model. They are the norms and standards that guide employee
behavior and company actions and thus, are the foundation of every organization.
The 14 Points
1.
Don't just do the same things better find better things to do.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Predict and prepare for future challenges, and always have the goal of getting better.
Put your customers' needs first, rather than react to competitive pressure and design products and
services to meet those needs.
Be prepared for a major change in the way business is done. It's about leading, not simply managing.
Don't just find what you did wrong eliminate the "wrongs" altogether.
Use statistical control methods not physical inspections alone to prove that the process is working.
Look at suppliers as your partners in quality. Encourage them to spend time improving their own
quality they shouldn't compete for your business based on price alone.
Analyze the total cost to you, not just the initial cost of the product.
Use quality statistics to ensure that suppliers meet your quality standards.
Encourage staff to learn from one another, and provide a culture and environment for effective
teamwork.
Implement leadership.
Expect your supervisors and managers to understand their workers and the processes they use.
Don't simply supervise provide support and resources so that each staff member can do his or her
best. Be a coach instead of a policeman.
Figure out what each person actually needs to do his or her best.
Find ways to reach full potential, and don't just focus on meeting targets and quotas.
Eliminate fear.
Allow people to perform at their best by ensuring that they're not afraid to express ideas or concerns.
Let everyone know that the goal is to achieve high quality by doing more things right and that you're
not interested in blaming people when mistakes happen.
Make workers feel valued, and encourage them to look for better ways to do things.
Ensure that your leaders are approachable and that they work with teams to act in the company's best
interests.
Use open and honest communication to remove fear from the organization.
9.
Don't let words and nice-sounding phrases replace effective leadership. Outline your expectations, and
then praise people face-to-face for doing good work.
Provide support and resources so that production levels and quality are high and achievable.
Measure the process rather than the people behind the process.
Tip:
There are situations in which approaches like Management By Objectives are appropriate, for example, in
motivating sales-people. As Deming points out, however, there are many situations where a focus on objectives can
lead people to cut corners with quality. You'll need to decide for yourself whether or not to use these approaches. If
you do, make sure that you think through the behaviors that your objectives will motivate.
12. Remove barriers to pride of workmanship.
Allow everyone to take pride in their work without being rated or compared.
Treat workers the same, and don't make them compete with other workers for monetary or other
rewards. Over time, the quality system will naturally raise the level of everyone's work to an equally
high level.
Encourage people to learn new skills to prepare for future changes and challenges.
Build skills to make your workforce more adaptable to change, and better able to find and achieve
improvements.
Analyze each small step, and understand how it fits into the larger picture.
Use effective change management principles to introduce the new philosophy and ideas in Deming's
14 points.
Theory X:
Theory X basically holds the belief that people do not like work and that some
kind of direct pressure and control must be exerted to get them to work
effectively. These people require a rigidly managed environment, usually
requiring threats of disciplinary action as a primary source of motivation. It is
also held that employees will only respond to monetary rewards as an incentive
to perform above the level of that which is expected
From a management point of view, autocratic (Theory X) managers like to
retain most of their authority. They make decisions on their own and inform the
workers, assuming that they will carry out the instructions. Autocratic managers
are often called "authoritative" for this reason; they act as "authorities". This
type of manager is highly task oriented, placing a great deal of concern towards
getting the job done, with little concern for the worker's attitudes towards the
manager's decision.
Theory X can be related to Taylors Scientific Management Theory.
According to Theory X and scientific management Theory what motivated
people at work is money. Workers sole satisfaction will be maximizing his
money. However in modern organizations, people required more than money
and here comes Theory Y into the picture.
Theory Y:
A more popular view of the relationship found in the work place between
managers and workers, is explained in the concepts of Theory Y. This theory
assumes that people are creative and eager to work. Workers tend to desire more
responsibility than Theory X workers, and have strong desires to participate in
the decision making process. Theory Y workers are comfortable in a working
environment which allows creativity and the opportunity to become personally
involved in organizational planning.
According to another of the authors studied for this project, in which the
"participative" (Theory Y) leadership style is discussed, a participative leader
shares decisions with the group. Douglas McGregor thinks that Theory Y
managers are more likely than Theory X managers to develop the climate of
trust with employees; a critical requirement for human resource development.
It's human resource development that is a crucial aspect of any organization.
This would include managers communicating openly with subordinates,
minimizing the difference between superior-subordinate relationships, creating a
Theory Z:
Theory Z deals with the way in which workers are perceived by managers, as
well as how managers are perceived by workers; is created and developed by
William Ouchi. Theory Z offers the notion of a hybrid management style which
is a combination of a strict American management style and a strict Japanese
management style This theory speaks of Ringi System of Management. This
decision-making system is the collective decision-making process and is highly
decentralized. Only after the consensus is reached the decision is taken. If the
decision is successful, then the one who has advocated it gets the credit but
interesting part is that in the event of unsuccessful decision-making, top
management takes the responsibility for the failure. Theory Z emphasizes things
2. When suitably motivated people are self directed to achieve organizational objectives.
3. Commitment of employees can be obtained by ensuring job satisfaction for them
4. People learn to accept responsibility and under suitable conditions actively seek
responsibility.
5. People are imaginative and creative.
Theory Z
your team will actually need two weeks. This is not about putting unnecessary
pressure on yourself or staff, or jeopardizing customer relations and accountability by
imposing unrealistic or impossible deadlines.
Your aim is to encourage yourself and other people to work differently, and to take
some risks. It will involve stepping outside your own comfort zone; so appreciate that
for everyone getting outside the comfort zone means an element of discomfort.
Introduce this as a challenge, not a threat. Encourage yourself and others to rise to the
challenge by making it fun and offering rewards, not by threatening with punishments
and adverse consequences.
5. Create Incentives to Finish Early
One reason Parkinsons Law is so prevalent in businesses is that people rarely have
the right incentives to finish early:
Even when youre the leader, it can be more desirable to continue perfecting your
current task for as long as possible than to start another. It can act as a security
blanket. Maybe youre avoiding your next task because it seems too daunting, for
example. Its the unknown! Cue: spooky whoo-oo-oo! sounds. But set an example to
your staff. Finish early when you are done.
So build in some incentives to finish each stage of your work. Promise yourself that if
you finish them early, you will give yourself mini-rewards. Take a quick break,
browse the web, go for a walk. Do whatever takes your fancy and enjoy the feeling of
having deserved it. The key here is to associate rewards with results, not with time
spent so dont fool yourself. Make the results tangible in their outcome your goal
should be to finish this project, not to spend an hour on it (and still leave it
unfinished).
Main point: you can effectively avoid becoming a victim of the Peter Principle by making a
commitment to learning from others.
control.
Below are tips to become a great leader like Welch:
Articulate a vision and lead others to execute it
Dont manage very little details
Involve everyone and welcome great ideas
GET LESS FORMAL
When people voice their ideas, or call him Jack instead of Mr. Welch or when his Work-Out process is
utilized, the corporation gets less formal. Jack doesnt wear ties to work, he often holds informal meetings
and encourages everyone to lighten up. Informality inspires people to have more ideas and it is one of the
keys to GEs success.
How can we get less formal?
Brainstorm with colleagues and bosses
Hold more informal meetings
Consider occasional informal get-togethers
Dont TOLERATE Bureaucracy, BLOW it Up!
Bureaucracy, the cancerous element of an organization, can create waste and slow the decision making
process, leading to unnecessary approvals and procedures that make a company less competitive. Welch
stressed that each employee should work on getting rid of bureaucracy every day. Bureaucracy can be the
most stubborn disease, but we can simplify and remove complexity and formality to make a company more
responsive and agile.
To kick bureaucracy and simplify things:
Drop unnecessary work
Work with colleagues to streamline decision making
Make your workplace more informal
Face REALITY. Stop Assuming
When Welch joined GE, the company was assumed to be in good shape, but Welch saw a sinking ship and
many troubles-the company was losing its market value and there was too much bureaucracy. Instead of
kidding himself and assuming that things would improve, Welch made a resolution and created a face
reality decree. He laid out strategies and initiatives that made things better.
Here are suggestions to help us see things as they are and not to assume:
Look at things with a fresh eye
Dont fall into the false scenarios trap
Leave yourself with several options
SIMPLIFY Things
Welch didnt think business had to be complicated, thus, his goal at GE was to de-complicate work. He
developed and initiated a signature program that made GE a simpler organization. To Welch, business can
be exciting and simple, without jargon and complexity.
Isnt simplifying things great? It allows our organizations to move along faster. Lets try Welchs advice:
Simplify the workplace
Make meetings simpler
Eliminate complicated memos and letters
CHANGE- An Opportunity, Not a Threat
When Welch joined GE, many didnt understand why he needed to make changes. They saw things as a bed
of roses, while Welch saw the reality and faced it. He initiated the necessary changes to make GE a far
more flexible and competitive organization. He made change a part of GEs shared value. Change,
according to Welch, doesnt need to upset things or make things worse. It can mean opportunities, good
ideas, new business or new products.
So, what are we going to do to cope with change?
Know that change is here to stay
Expect the least expected, but move quickly to stay a step ahead
Prepare those around you for the inevitable change that will affect their lives
Lead by Energizing Others, not Managing by Authority
Leadership does not mean control or command. Welch called his leadership ideal boundaryless, which
means an open organization, free of bureaucracy and anything that prevents the free flow of ideas, people