Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
"Talent Management" has become one of the most significant buzzwords in Corporate HR and Training today.
Talent Management is an excursion from Personnel to Strategic HR to Talent Management. To realize why Talent
Management has become so important needs the need to gaze at the evolution of business HR:
It was identified that majority of the employee quit the job, happens in first six months period after joining the
organization. It causes serious problem and very high expenses for the organization, especially in IT industries.
The Team leaders/Head and Managers are directly responsible for this turnover. To overcome this problem first the Team
leaders/Head and Managers should be capable of handling Talent Management Competencies effectively, which in turn
develop the organization commitment and job satisfaction which will reduce the turnover intentions. Thus an attempt is
made to study about the Team Leaders/ Head and Managers Talent Management Competencies level.
The organizations considered for the study are large IT companies. In order to remain market leaders in the field,
their employees need to be competent to cope with continual specialized technological updates and rapidly increasing
customer base. Due to the organizations heightened awareness of the limited availability of experienced talented
employees, an integrated Talent Management process has been introduced. The intention within this organization is for the
managers to understand the impact of such a strategy and to take accountability for their involvement in the process.
The universe of the study constitutes to leading and large IT companies in Bangalore. Top 5 IT Companies that adopted
talent management practices were considered as the population of the study.
editor@tjprc.org
22
G. Sivanesan
human assets managers and their organisations over the globe (Hiltrop, 1999). As an outcome of a highly comparable
market, businesses are finding out that, not only is it evolving increasingly difficult to employ top talents, but that they are
running the constant risk of leaving behind the ones they have to compete.
Several researchers exhibit various researches showing that organisations are increasingly focusing on Talent
Management. The Society for Human Resource Managements Talent Management Survey Report (SHRM, 2006),
provides that 53% of organisations had explicit Talent Management programmes in place and this increased to 86% for
large organisations with increase in HR employees from 50% to 99%. Of these companies, 76% consider Talent
administration to be a peak priority. As competition increases for a restricted group of talented employees, organisations
have started to invest more in Talent Management strategies. Business and HR professionals measure the progress of these
strategies in terms of key Talent Management outcomes such as retention, hiring of top talent, bench strength and diversity.
Talent management is one term which still is in search of a definite meaning. For some, it means as an identical
succession planning; for some others, it means seamlessly -integrated efforts to appeal, evolve and retain the best people;
and, for some persons, it means efforts designed to integrate all constituents of an organizations human resources scheme
to appeal, choose, evolve, appraise, pay, and retain the best persons. Many of the authors arrive up with delineation for
Talent management as the one that meets the organizations unique needs.
"Talent Management" has become one of the most significant buzzwords in Corporate HR and Training today.
Talent Management is an excursion from Personnel to Strategic HR to Talent Management. To realize why Talent
Management has become so important needs the need to gaze at the evolution of business HR:
To know the relationship between Talent Management Competencies with organization commitment and job
satisfaction.
To study the effect of Talent Management Competencies on the employees intention to remain with the
organization.
23
Sl.
No
Dimensions
1.
Talent
Management
Mindset
2.
Attracts and
recruit Talent
3.
Identify and
differentiates
talented
employees
Descriptions
Source
4.
Develop Others
5.
Builds and
Maintain
Positive
relationships
6.
Provides
meaningful and
challenging
work
7.
Remunerates
and reward
fairly
8.
Manages Work
Life Balance
Job Satisfaction
Job satisfaction was measured using the abridged version of the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) developed by Smith,
Kendall & Hulin (as cited by Kinicki, et al., 2002). The abridged JDI (AJDI) measures five facets of job satisfaction,
namely work itself, pay, promotion, supervision and co-workers.
Affective Commitment
The Affective Commitment subscale has been found to be the single best predictor of intentions to leave.
Affective commitment was measured using the Affective Commitment Scale (ACS), a subscale of Meyer and Allens
(1991, 1997)
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
24
G. Sivanesan
Intention to Quit
Intention to quit the organization was measured by means of a modified version of Arnold and Feldmans (1982)
scale. Responses to each item were on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.
Employees responded to each of the following items: 1) Intend to quit the job, 2) Intent a genuine effort to find another job,
3) Often thinking about quitting the job, and 4) Intend to shift to other sector from IT. This scale takes into consideration
intention to quit and intention to search for alternatives, both of which are final cognitive variables immediately preceding
(and having a causal effect on) intention to quit.
RESEARCH DESIGN
adopted talent management practices were considered as the population of the study.
From the above mentioned top 5 talent management practicing companies a total of 376 employees, who have
been identified as talented employees with management potential and who had enrolled in leadership development
programme was considered as the sample size. Most of the employees were in the upper middle position
(Team Leaders, Team Head and Managers. Majority of the employees have subordinate who report to them.
Thus purposive sampling technique (Homogeneous) will be appropriate for the above mentioned sampling technique.
Measurement Instrument
Talent management Competencies, Job satisfaction, Affective Commitment and Intention to Quit was measured
by means of the questionnaire developed for this study. Responses to the items were based on a five point
Likert Frequency scale ranging from (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = Moderate 4 = agree, and 5 = strongly agree).
Development of Questionnaire
The questionnaire consists of Four Parts. The first part consists of personal details related to the employees
The statistical analyses were made with the help of SPSS, PLS and AMOS packages.
Source of Data
The study is descriptive and quantitative in Nature. Both primary and secondary data were used for the study.
25
The primary data were collected from the structured questionnaire. The secondary data were obtained from Journal,
Magazines, Books, Research Journals and articles published by the organization.
Limitation
The Study concentrates only Top 5 Leading, Branded and Large IT Industries in Bangalore which practices
Talent Management.
Only the Upper middle level employee (Team Leader, Team Head and Managers) were considered as
population of the study.
Only selected important Talent Management Competencies suitable for IT industries were considered for the
Study.
RESULTS
Quality Criteria
Table 2
AVE
TM Mind Set
Identifies and differentiates
Attracts & Recruits Talent
Develops Others
Builds & Maintains Positive Relations
Provides meaningful & Challenging work
Remunerates & Rewards Fairly
Manages Work-life Balance
Job Satisfaction
Affective commitment
Intention to Quit
0.563888
0.650390
0.627818
0.575975
0.505888
0.606752
0.471966
0.706198
0.644950
0.515593
0.759783
Composite
Reliability
0.835066
0.917534
0.893621
0.841787
0.795944
0.884101
0.841660
0.921850
0.951767
0.863242
0.926651
R Square
Nil
Nil
0.469557
0.294582
0.437185
0.896606
0.454239
0.863606
0.994773
0.846160
0.519802
Cronbachs
Alpha
0.735440
0.893349
0.854823
0.776008
0.698144
0.834178
0.777788
0.889881
0.943120
0.809416
0.894421
To attain reliability and Convergent validity the study should attain CR > 0.7 (reliability), CR > (AVE) and AVE
> 0.5 (Convergent Validity). The Composite reliability in the study is above.7, and all the Composite reliability values
were higher than the average variance explained, the average variance explained were higher than. 5. The analysis
indicated that all dimensions were valid and reliable measures for their respective constructs. The convergent validity is
achieved.
Modeling Talent Management Competencies with Job Satisfaction, Affective Commitment and Intention to Quit
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
26
G. Sivanesan
Figure 1
27
According to the proposed model, the Talent Management Competencies are depicted as the exogenous latent
variable, with Affective Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Intention to Quit depicted as the endogenous latent variables. It
is proposed that certain Talent Management competency dimensions will contribute to the development of Affective
Commitment and increased Job Satisfaction and this will result in reduced Intention to Quit.
In the exogenous latent variable (Talent Management Competencies) eight dimensions are considered. Each
dimension has individual statements to measure the dimensions of Talent Management Competencies. The dimensions of
Talent Management Competencies are Talent Management Mindset, Attracts and recruits talent, Identifies and
Differentiates talent employees, Develop Others, Builds and Maintain Positive relationships, Provides meaningful and
challenging Environment, Remunerates and Rewards Fairly, Manages Work-Life Balance.
A comprehensive Talent Management competency model was developed that defines and describes the Team
Leaders / Head and Managers behaviours required in order to successfully carry out the Talent Management strategies
within an organisation. These competencies were evaluated against the outcomes of Job Satisfaction, Affective
Commitment and Intention to quit that the Talent Management competencies are meant to affect.
Based on the intensive literature research, 23 hypotheses were framed and analyzed. Out of 23 hypotheses framed,
18 hypotheses were accepted and the remaining 5 hypotheses were rejected based on the path value and t value.
The dimensions R2 values were greater than the required rule of thumb.10.
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS
The most important implication resulting from this study is the confirmation of the significant link between the
exogenous latent variable, Talent Management Mindset, and the endogenous latent variables of Attracts and Recruits
Talent, Develop others, Builds and Maintains Relationships, Provides Meaningful and Challenging Work, Remunerates
and Rewards Fairly and Manages Work-life Balance. The magnitude of these path coefficients indicates a substantial
influence of Talent Management Mindset on these Talent Management competency variables. The conclusion to be drawn
from this is that Team Leaders/Head and managers who display a Talent Management mindset, could also be expected to
be competent in management skills which include attracting and recruiting talented employees; building and maintaining
excellent relations with these employees; providing the employees with meaningful and challenging work; and managing
their work-life balance. The benefit to the organisation in each of these instances would be of great value.
The Top level management should believe that Talent Management competencies will increase job satisfaction
and affective commitment, which in turn will reduce the Team Leaders/Head and managers intentions to quit the job.
The intention of this research study was to provide the organisation with a method to constructively, rationally and
purposefully manage the Talent Management performance of Team Leaders/Head and managers. The study provided some
tentative evidence to warrant the use of this measure to establish the Talent Management development needs of the Team
Leaders/Head and managers to structure their training programmes accordingly.
CONCLUSIONS
This study was motivated by a need to empower the Human Resource function to rationally and purposefully
monitor and manage the determinants of turnover intention, and through that, the intention to quit of talented employees.
A partial talent management structural model was developed, mapping Team Leaders / Head and manager talent
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
28
G. Sivanesan
management competencies on the outcomes of job satisfaction, affective commitment and intention to quit. The partial
talent management structural model was tested. 18 of the 23 stated hypotheses were confirmed. The study provides unique
insight into the manner in which the talent management competencies are causally related among themselves, and provides
support for studies which link affective commitment and intention to quit, as well as job satisfaction and intention to quit.
REFERENCES
1.
Antonucci, E.J. (2005). The leadership benchstrength challenge: building integrated talent management systems.
Available from Executive Development Associates.
2.
Arnold, H.J., & Feldman, D.C. (1982). A multivariate analysis of the determinants of job turnover. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 67(3), 350-360.
3.
Boudreau, J.W., & Ramstad, P.M. (2005). Talent and the new paradigm for human resource management: From
professional practices to strategic talent decision science. Human Resource Planning, 28(2), 17-26
4.
Buckingham, M., & Vosburgh, R.M. (2001). The 21st century human resources function: Its the talent, stupid!
Human Resources Planning, 24(4), 17-23.
5.
Chambers, E.G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S.M. & Michaels, E.G. (1998). The war for talent.
The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 44-57
6.
Cohn, J.M., Khurana, R., & Reeves, L. (2005). Growing talent as if your business depended on it. Harvard
Business Review, October 2005, 62-70.
7.
Garger, E.M. (1999). Holding on to high performers: A strategic approach to retention. Compensation and
Benefits Management, 15(4), 10-17
8.
Gaylard, M., Sutherland, M., & Viedge, C. (2005). The factors perceived to influence the retention of information
technology workers. South African Journal of Business Management, 36(3), 87-97.
9.
Griffen, N.S. (2003). Personalize your management development. Harvard Business Review, March 2003,
113-119.
10. Hiltrop, J-M. (1995). The changing psychological contract: The human resource challenge of the 1990s.
European Management Journal, 3, 286-294
11. Jacobs. D. (2005). In search of future leaders: Managing the global pipeline. Ivy Business Journal, March/April
2005, 1-4.
12. Kaye, B., & Jordan Evans, S. (2002). Retention in tough times. Training and Development. 56(1), 32-37.
Retrieved November 12, 2004.
13. Kesler, G.C. (2002). Why the leadership bench never gets deeper: Ten insights about executive talent
development. Human Resource Planning, 25, 32-44.
14. Kinicki, A.K., McKee-Ryan, F.M., Schriesheim, C.A., & Carson, K.P. (2002).Assessing the construct validity of
the Job Descriptive Index: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 14-32.
29
15. Levin, R., & Rosse, J. (2001). Talent flow: A strategic approach to keeping good employees, helping them grow
and letting them go. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Marquez, J. (2006). Raising the performance bar. Workforce Management, April 24, 2006. Retrieved June 11,
2006.
17. Meyer, J.P., & Allen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organisational commitment. Human
Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
18. Rayton, B.A. (2006). Examining the interconnection of job satisfaction and organisational commitment: An
application of the bivariate probit model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1), 139-154.
19. Scott, A., Gravelle, H., Simoens, S., Bojke, C., & Sibbald,B. (2006). Job satisfaction and quitting intentions: a
structural model of British general practitioners. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 519-540.
20. SHL (2000a). Inventory of management competencies (IMC). Retrieved June 1, 2006.
21. SHRM (2006). Human Resources Glossary. Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM). Retrieved
August 21, 2006.
22. Spencer, L.M., & Spencer, S.M. (1993). Competence at work. Models for superior performance. New York: John
Wiley & Sons.
23. Stallworth. H.L. (2003). Mentoring, organisational commitment and intentions to leave public accounting.
Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(5), 405-418
24. Sutherland, M., & Jordaan, W. (2004). Factors affecting the retention of knowledge workers. South African
Journal of Human Resource Management, 2(2), 55-64.
25. Taylor, C.R. (2002). Focus on talent. Training and Development, 56(12), 26-31.
26. Wellins, R.S. (2001). Ten ways to hiring better and faster. Employment Relations Today, Summer 2001, 28(2),
79-86
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org