Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This paper illustrates how practical application of surveillance
and monitoring principles are keys to understanding reservoir
performance and identifying opportunities that will improve
ultimate oil recovery. Implementation of various principles
recommended by industry experts is presented using examples
from fields currently in production.
Practices on how to process valuable information and
analyze data from different perspectives are presented in a
methodical way on the following bases: field, block, pattern,
and wells. A novel diagnostic plot is presented to assess well
performance and identify problem wells for the field.
Introduction
Surveillance and monitoring techniques were first discussed in
SPE literature in the early 1960s1. Since then, several highly
recognized authors have published related materials2,3,4,5,6,7,8.
Industry experts recommend the following valuable principles:
A Multilevel Approach
After reviewing many waterflood case studies, one of the key
lessons learned is to use a methodical approach to understand
where the opportunities exist, thus preventing the
implementation of biased action plans or hastily made
judgments. This is especially important under the current
environment where optimization of human and capital
resources is a critical issue.
The proposed procedure goes from a large scale to the
detailed as follows.
Field Level
SPE 102200
2.
3.
SPE 102200
oil and water rate between those dates. The same dates are
used for all the wells.
In the X-axis, the ratio of current water rate to previous
water rate is plotted. In the Y-axis, the ratio of current oil rate
to previous oil rate is plotted. Each point in the chart
represents a single well with which several behaviors can be
quickly identified:
Figure 11 shows that the Wcut for Bangko field has been
approximately 80% from the beginning, a typical
characteristic of aquifer supported fields. By contrast, El
Trapial field, which does not have aquifer support, required
approximately 0.4 PVI to reach the same Wcut level.
Validating the pattern configuration. A good exercise to
perform at this level is to calculate the average total fluid
production and injection rate per well at reservoir conditions.
After doing so, the ratio of injection to production for the
average well is calculated and referred to as the I/P ratio. This
value should be close to the one given by the pattern injection
selected for the field. As a reminder, a five-spot pattern gives a
1:1 I/P ratio making it necessary to have one injector for each
producer. If the I/P ratio is close to 2:1, an inverted seven-spot
pattern will be optimal and a 3:1 I/P ratio will be suitable for
an inverted nine-spot pattern7.
Table 1 shows the I/P ratios for the three given examples.
This ratio is approximately 2:1 for El Trapial, therefore an
inverted seven-spot pattern was chosen for the field. Had the
decision been made to develop using a five-spot pattern, the
number of injector wells would have been much higher and
unnecessary capital expenditures would have occurred.
In the case of Bangko and Meren fields, the ratio is
between 4 and 7, indicating a much higher value of injection
relative to production rates. These two cases employed
peripheral waterfloods with average permeabilities in the
range of 0.5 to 10 Darcys, higher reservoir continuity and
conductivity, and some aquifer support.
The ABC plot. When looking at a field with hundreds of
wells, identifying the performance of all wells can be
overwhelming. Additionally, well review meetings are usually
time consuming and difficult to keep focused. A different
approach has been taken by using a plot called
the After-Before-Compare or ABC plot. This plot uses
well test production data from two distinct dates and compares
SPE 102200
SPE 102200
What is the oil rate (log scale) versus time plot showing?
It is recommended to make a plot of oil rate versus
cumulative oil and to note the observed behavior in the
oil rate versus time plot.
What level of voidage replacement ratio is needed to
maintain reservoir pressure? If no aquifer support exists,
a target value of 110% is recommended as a starting
point. In some cases, such as highly depleted reservoirs,
this value could be significantly higher.
Is the water-injection rate target being achieved?
Is there a clear relationship between the VRR and the
total liquid and oil production rates?
Is the pattern configuration appropriate? Is this
consistent with the drive mechanism and the I/P ratio?
Has the decision of inverted nine-spot, inverted sevenspot, five-spot, line drive, or peripheral pattern made
based upon appropriate pattern selection analysis?
What does the ABC plot show? Are there indications of
water channeling? How about wells with total liquid
decrease or increase?
Which areas of the field show opportunities when
looking at the GOR, Wcut, and pressure maps?
SPE 102200
Challenges
Some of the challenges that the authors have often faced when
performing surveillance and monitoring evaluations include:
Conclusions
Following a methodical surveillance and monitoring process
from the field to block to pattern to wells levels, the following
conclusions are drawn:
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Chevron and the business units that
shared their examples: Latin America, Indonesia, and Africa.
In addition, we would like to express our sincere appreciation
to many colleagues in Chevron, especially, H.J. Payne, J.D.
Dolan, N. Vrubel, T. Perinot, P. Berri, R. Cobeas, N. Marot,
A. Pitts, Donny and W. T. Lackey.
Nomenclature
Ea
EUR
Evert
Evol
GOR
I/P ratio
=
=
=
=
=
=
OOIP
PVI
RF
Rs
VRR
Wcut
=
=
=
=
=
=
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
SPE 102200
Field name
Country
Onshore/Offshore
Geologic Description
Natural Drive Mechanism
Permeability, mD
El Trapial
Bangko
Meren
ARGENTINA
INDONESIA
NIGERIA
Onshore
Onshore
Offshore
Sandstones
Sandstones
Sandstones
Aquifer
75
530
700 - 10,000
15-18
25
20 - 37
37
34
27
Oil Viscosity, cP
1.1
4.2
1.5 - 2.2
Porosity, %
950
770
2,200 - 2,600
OOIP, MMbbl
990
1,630
2,400
Data Date
Jan-06
Sep-05
Nov-05
41,800
40,000
69,000
178
550
970
434,000
415,000
175,000
88
94
45
380
210
78
250
30
15
I/P Ratio
Injection Scheme
1.9 : 1.0
4.4 : 1.0
6.8 : 1.0
Inverted 7-Spot
Peripheral
Peripheral
Field
Block
Pattern
ABC Plot
PVI vs. RF
E vol
PVI / year
Hall Plot
Well
SPE 102200
Figures
150%
VRR (%)
100%
100
50%
1,000
High Wcut
VRR
Oil Rate
0%
0
50
100
Low Wcut
10
200
150
Time (Month)
VRR (%)
100%
100
150%
50%
High GOR
Low GOR
VRR
Oil Rate
0%
0
50
100
10
200
150
Figure 5. El Trapial field gas oil ratio (GOR) map showing low
GORs in the southeast of the field and higher than dissolved
values to the northwest of the field.
Time (Month)
1,000
Low Pressure
200%
100
100%
VRR
Oil Rate
0%
10
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Time (Month)
300%
VRR (%)
High Pressure
SPE 102200
50%
40%
30%
20%
Bangko
10%
Meren
El Trapial
0%
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
150%
60%
40%
100%
20%
VRR (%)
400
80%
600
100%
Bangko
Meren
El Trapial
0%
200
50%
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Total Liquid
VRR
0
0
50
100
0%
200
150
Time (Month)
400%
120
300%
80
200%
40
VRR (%)
160
4.0
3.0
2.0
1,1 coordinate
point
1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
100%
0.0
Total Liquid
VRR
0
0
50
100
150
200
Time (Month)
250
0%
300
10
SPE 102200
3,000,000
Cumulative [Well Head Pressure * Time]
(psi*days)
No injectivity change
Injectivity change, Injection out of zone
2,000,000
1,000,000
Injection out of
zone period
0
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
Oil Rate
Target Injection
Figure 16. Hall plot examples. Black dashed line case well
shows no change in injectivity. Red dashed line case well
suffered corrosion problems that caused injectivity out of zone.
Water Injection
4,000
3,000
2,000
92
APT
ET318
ET555
APT
ET93
ET495
APT
ET349
ET523
1,000
ET188
ET160
ET399
ET96
ET217
ET534
ET358
APT
APT
ET272
ET470
ET345
ET481
AGN
APT
ET323
ET49
ET161
APT
ET174
ET350
ET563
ET450
T69
ET391
ET97
ET377
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
ET352
ET324
ET303
160
ET304
AGN
APT
ET275
ETM1
APT
AGN
ET351
ET162
ET129
Time (months)
ET256
ET344
ET488
ET319
ET541
ET225
ET367
ET379
ET503
AGN
AGN
ET550
ET329
APT
ET407
ET261
ET278
ET92
ET452
APT
ET133
ET130
ET330
APT
ET360
ET546
APT
ET489
AGN
75
200%
100,000
1,000
100
25
Oil Rate
Total Liquid
GOR
Wcut
10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
140
Time (months)
50
10,000
ET59
ET486
ET283
AGN
ET90
ET247
ET264
ET94
T521
ET305
APT
AGN
150%
100%
10,000
50%
Pilot Start
1,000
80
90
100
110
120
130
0%
140
Time (months)