Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1057
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
343
L Chandra Sekhar et al
ARMAMENTARIUM
344
PROCEDURE
The entire study spanned over a period of 12 weeks for
each patient. The treatment plan for every patient was
divided into 8 phases as shown in Table 1.
Clinical Parameters Assessed
JCDP
A Comparative Study of Temporary Splints: Bonded Polyethylene Fiber Reinforcement Ribbon
etched with the etchant gel. The gel was applied overall the enamel surfaces to be bonded for 1 minute by
means of an applicator. A dabbing rather than rubbing
motion was used. Care was taken to avoid saliva
contamination and contact of the acid-conditioner with
the root surface and the soft tissues. The etchant was
then rinsed off thoroughly with saline for 1/2 to 1 minute,
and the teeth were dried with compressed air. After
etching, the enamel surface had a frosted-glass, dull
whitish appearance.
Desired length of wire was taken and adapted to the
etched surface of the teeth. Once the length of the wire
was measured, the clear bonding agent was applied as a
thin layer on the etched dry enamel with an applicator
and blown of slightly. In cases where the teeth to be
splinted were too mobile, they were first stabilized
interproximally with the bonding agent.
The appropriate shade of the restorative composite
material was selected and patted into intimate contact
Phases
Control group
Experimental group
1 week
Phase 2
2 weeks
Phase 1
1 week
Phase 0
2 weeks
Phase 1
3 weeks
Phase 3
2 weeks
Phase 6
1 week
Phase 8
Phase 9
345
L Chandra Sekhar et al
RESULTS
Group A: Stainless steel wire + composite splint
Group B: Ribbond ribbon + composite splint
A total of 180 anterior teeth were treated, 120 (80 mobile,
40 firm) in the experimental group and 60 (40 mobile, 20
firm) in the control group. In the experimental group, 20
splints (10 composite + stainless steel wire and 10 fiber
reinforce composite) were fabricated at week -1 (16 lower
346
17
13
35 to 55
45
Phase
Tooth mobility
mean value
Plaque index
mean value
Control without
splinting
2
1
8
9
1.0830
1.0490
0.7350
0.6690
1.0730
0.6600
0.7000
0.7000
Group A
Stainless steel wire
+ composite splint
2
1
8
9
1.0910
1.0910
0.5860
0.4660
1.0100
0.5800
0.9800
0.8100
Group B
Ribbond ribbon
+ composite splint
2
1
8
9
1.1340
1.1340
0.6080
0.5090
0.8900
0.5300
0.8000
0.6300
OBSERVATIONS
Tooth Mobility
JCDP
A Comparative Study of Temporary Splints: Bonded Polyethylene Fiber Reinforcement Ribbon
Plaque Index
Splint Assessment
Nine partial fractures of the splint occurred on the lingual
aspect in Steel group at phase 3, 6 and 8. In Ribbond group
only 2 fractures of the splint occurred at phase 3.
There were 14 instances of reversible discoloration of
the composite resin in steel group. In Ribbond Group 13
instances of reversible discoloration of the composite resin
occurred. But none of irreversible staining.
All 20 patients in the experimental group (10-Steel and
10-Ribbond) reported an improvement of masticatory
comfort after placement of the splint.
Steel and Ribbond splints have showed good
compatibility with the gingival tissues and oral mucosa. No
adverse reactions were seen.
DISCUSSION
In patients, selected for this study, however, the mobility of
the teeth was attributable to local inflammatory causative
factors only; the stringent criteria for selection excluded all
other possible etiologic factors such as traumatic occlusion,
inadequate root length, periapical pathosis, systemic
disturbances, parafunctional habits, prosthetic replacements,
orthodontic treatment or prior periodontal surgeries.
347
L Chandra Sekhar et al
348
JAYPEE
JCDP
A Comparative Study of Temporary Splints: Bonded Polyethylene Fiber Reinforcement Ribbon
5. Ganesh M, Tandon Shobha. Versatility of ribbond in
contemporary dental practice. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs
2006;20:53-58.
6. Wahl Norman. Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 1: Antiquity
to the mid 19th century Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2005;127:255-59.
7. Laster L, Laudenbach KW, Stoller NH: An evaluation of clinical
tooth mobility measurements. J Periodontol 1975;46:603-07.
8. Silness P, Loe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy Acta Odontal
Scand 1964;22:121.
9. Stern IB. The status of temporary fixed splinting procedures in
the treatment of periodontally involved teeth. J Periodontal 1960;
31:217.
10. Wilson, et al. Textbook of Advances in Periodontics Occlusal
Trauma 1992:215.
11. Ferreira Zulene Alves, et al. Bondable reinforcement ribbon:
Clinical applications. Quint Int 2000;31:547.
12. Weisgold AS, Baumgarten HS. Contemporary Periodontics,
Occlusal Therapy 1990:503.
13. Bhavsar Neeta V. Periodontal splints A Boon or A Bane? J.
Indian Soc Perio 2002;5:21-25.
14. Kleinfelder Jorg W, Ludwig Klaus. Maximal bite force in
patients with reduced periodontal tissue support with and without
splinting. J. Periodontol 2002;73:1184.
15. Carranza Fermin A, et al. Clinical Periodontology (9th ed)
Clinical Diagnosis 2003:438-39.
16. Schmid MO, et al. A new reinforced intracoronal composite
resin splint. J Periodontol 1979;50(9):441.
17. Forsberg A, Hagglund G. Mobility of the teeth as a check of
Periodontal therapy. Acta Odontol Scandinavica 1958;15:305.
18. Goldberg HJV. Changes in tooth mobility during periodontal
therapy. J Dent Res (supl) 1962;29:261.
19. Lindhe J, et al. The effect of the plaque control and surgical
pocket elimination on the establishment and maintenance of
periodontal health. J Clin Perio 1975;2:67.
B Ravi Shankar
Professor, Department of Endodontics, Al-Badar Dental College,
Gulbarga, Karnataka, India
A Gopinath
Professor, Department of Orthodontics, AMES Dental Collage,
Raichur, Karnataka, India
349