Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1617/s11527-011-9811-0
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 28 June 2009 / Accepted: 4 December 2011 / Published online: 3 January 2012
RILEM 2011
M. T. Bassuoni
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
M. L. Nehdi (&)
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5B9,
Canada
e-mail: mnehdi@eng.uwo.ca
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
Self-consolidating concrete (SCC) readily flows and
consolidates under its own weight with little or no
vibration. It is particularly suitable for precast applications, hard-to-reach areas and heavily reinforced
sections. The mixture design of SCC usually incorporates an efficient superplasticizer, relatively high
amounts of fine materials, low water-to-powder ratio,
and controlled proportions of coarse aggregates.
Viscosity-modifying admixtures (VMAs) can be used
in SCC to enhance stability of the flowable material
and inhibit segregation and bleeding. Hence, the fresh
properties and rheological characteristics of SCC are
different than that of normal concrete, but both SCC
and normal concrete may exhibit comparable mechanical properties if designed for similar strength grades
[1]. Yet, due to the difference in mixture design,
978
2 Experimental programme
2.1 Materials
Twenty-three SCC mixtures with a w/cm of 0.38 were
prepared using single, binary, ternary and quaternary
Table 1 Chemical and
physical properties of
cement and SCMs
979
OPC
SRPC
Silica
fume
Fly ash
Slag
Limestone
filler
SiO2 (%)
19.8
22.3
94.0
48.9
35.0
0.3
CaO (%)
63.2
63.8
0.4
3.8
36.1
Al2O3 (%)
Fe2O3 (%)
5.0
2.4
3.5
4.0
0.1
0.1
23.3
14.9
11.2
0.5
MgO (%)
3.3
2.8
0.4
0.7
11.4
K2O (%)
1.2
0.4
0.9
1.7
0.5
SO3 (%)
3.0
2.1
1.3
0.2
3.3
Na2O (%)
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.5
TiO2 (%)
0.3
0.3
0.6
CaCO3 (%)
99.0
2.5
0.9
4.7
0.3
410
377
19,530
280
468
3,200
Specific gravity
3.17
3.15
2.12
2.08
2.90
2.70
C3S
61
54
C2S
11
23
C3A
C4AF
14
980
Binder
code
Cement
(kg)
100% SRPC
SRPC
470
100% OPC
A1, B1 or C1
92% OPC, 8% SF
A2, B2 or C2
Silica fume
(kg)
Slag
(kg)
Fly ash
(kg)
Limestone
filler (kg)
470
430
40
A3, B3 or C3
235
25
210
A4, B4 or C4
235
95
70
70
A5, B5 or C5
235
25
120
90
SRPC sulphate resistant portland cement; OPC ordinary portland cement; SF silica fume; S slag; LF limestone filler; FA fly ash
Binder
code
981
Mix.
ID
Steel
fibres
(kg)
Polypropylene
fibres (kg)
Fine
aggregate
(kg)
Coarse
aggregate
(kg)
Air-entraining
agent (ml/100 kg
of binder)
SRPC
SRPC
870
870
A1
A1-N-50
870
870
A2
A2-N-50
860
860
A3
A3-N-50
855
855
A4
A4-N-50
845
845
A5
A5-N-50
840
840
B1-A-40
655
1,015
45
B1-A-60
1,015
655
35
B2-A-40
640
990
70
B2-A-60
990
640
50
B3-A-40
640
985
70
B3-A-60
985
640
60
B4
B4-A-40
B4-A-60
625
970
970
625
110
95
B5
B5-A-40
625
965
120
B5-A-60
965
625
100
C1-A-S
40
830
805
35
C1-A-P
825
820
40
Group A
Group B
B1
B2
B3
SRPC 100% sulphate
resistant portland cement;
A1, B1, or C1 100% OPC;
A2, B2, or C2 92%
OPC ? 8% SF; A3, B3, or
C3 50% OPC ? 5%
SF ? 45% S; A4, B4, or C4
50% OPC ? 15%
LF ? 20% S ? 15% FA;
A5, B5, or C5 50%
OPC ? 5% SF ? 25%
S ? 20% FA; N non airentrained; A air-entrained;
50, 40, 60 S/A is 50, 40 and
60%, respectively; S, P,
H steel, polypropylene and
hybrid fibres, respectively
Group C
C1
C1-A-H
30
830
805
40
C2
C2-A-H
30
825
795
60
C3
C3-A-H
30
820
790
65
C4
C4-A-H
30
805
780
100
C5
C5-A-H
30
800
775
105
3 Results
The SCC specimens immersed in the 5% ammonium
sulphate solution showed marked features of damage
(e.g. Fig. 1) during the period of exposure. The
specimens showed various levels of swelling, cracking, softening and disintegration. This indicated the
severe aggression of this exposure, in which the SCC
specimens tested had variable performance depending
on the mixture design parameters. Apparently, the role
of physical resistance (low penetrability) [13] of this
type of high-performance concrete (high powder
982
Table 4 Hardened
properties of groups A, B
and C specimens at 56 days
Mix.
ID
Unit
weight
(kg/m3)
Compressive
strength
(MPa)
Flexural
strength
(MPa)
Ed
(GPa)
SRPC
SRPC
2,383
43.69
5.20
43.8
A1
A1-N-50
2,371
47.12
4.99
45.40
A2
A2-N-50
2,388
54.6
5.06
44.02
A3
A3-N-50
2,365
50.18
4.40
41.38
A4
A4-N-50
2,351
41.71
3.91
41.08
A5
A5-N-50
2,335
46.78
4.20
40.04
B1-A-40
2,291
38.91
4.41
41.25
B1-A-60
2,269
35.16
4.05
37.02
B2-A-40
2,284
43.64
4.23
40.94
B2-A-60
2,267
41.43
4.18
39.20
B3-A-40
2,253
39.56
3.76
34.37
B3-A-60
2,246
36.23
3.91
36.95
B4
B4-A-40
B4-A-60
2,259
2,239
32.34
31.18
3.61
3.43
35.07
33.01
B5
B5-A-40
2,218
34.23
3.50
34.04
B5-A-60
2,213
32.39
3.32
36.14
C1-A-S
2,295
38.21
4.10
37.68
C1-A-P
2,273
32.15
4.27
34.79
Binder
code
Group A
Group B
B1
B2
B3
Group C
C1
C1-A-H
2,290
37.44
4.70
39.13
C2
C2-A-H
2,297
42.34
4.65
39.95
C3
C3-A-H
2,276
39.86
4.22
35.86
C4
C4-A-H
2,264
33.41
3.74
36.64
C5
C5-A-H
2,237
36.71
4.08
35.12
983
130
(a)
120
SRPC
A1-N-50
A2-N-50
A3-N-50
A4-N-50
A5-N-50
110
REd (%)
100
B1-A-40
B2-A-40
B3-A-40
B4-A40
B5-A-40
110
90
80
B1-A-60
B2-A-60
B3-A-60
B4-A-60
B5-A-60
100
90
80
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
130
(c)
120
10
15
20
25
C1-A-S
C1-A-P
C1-A-H
C2-A-H
C3-A-H
C4-A-H
C5-A-H
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
30
35
Time (Weeks)
Time (Weeks)
REd (%)
(b)
120
RE d (%)
130
40
45
50
55
Time (Weeks)
Fig. 2 Relative dynamic modulus of elasticity versus time for groups: a A, b B, and c C specimens
40
45
50
55
984
polypropylene) in mixture C1-A-H achieved comparable performance to that of mixture B1-A-S until
41 weeks of exposure. Subsequently, it had deterioration between that of mixtures made with pure steel
and polypropylene fibres.
3.2 Expansion
The results of expansion of the SCC specimens are
shown in Fig. 3. In group A, specimens from mixture
SRPC showed the lowest expansion of 0.07%,
whereas the control SCC (A1-N-50) specimens had
the highest expansion of 0.34%. The binary, ternary
and quaternary binder blends led to a marked reduction in expansion. For example, the T specimens
(A3-N-50) prepared with 50% OPC, 5% SF and 45% S
yielded an expansion value of 0.09%, which is about
25% of the corresponding value of the control
specimens.
In most cases, it seems that air-entrainment in group
B mixtures had a positive effect on reducing the
expansion of SCC specimens compared to that of the
corresponding non-air-entrained specimens from
group A mixtures. However, such an effect depended
on the type of binder. For instance, the control airentrained specimens (B1-A-40 and B1-A-60) at S/A of
40 and 60% had expansion values of 25% and 38%,
respectively, of the expansion value of the corresponding control non-air-entrained specimens (A1-N-
0.80
Group A
Group B
Group C
0.70
0.54
0.34
0.40
0.38
0.50
0.07
0.06
0.06
C4-A-H
C5-A-H
0.06
C2-A-H
C3-A-H
0.11
0.08
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.05
B5-A-40
0.02
B4-A-60
0.13
0.06
0.13
0.08
0.12
0.07
0.10
0.09
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.16
Expansion (%)
0.60
C1-A-H
C1-A-P
C1-A-S
B5-A-60
B4-A-40
B3-A-60
B3-A-40
B2-A-40
B2-A-60
B1-A-40
B1-A-60
A4-N-50
A5-N-50
A3-N-50
A2-N-50
A1-N-50
SRPC
0.00
Fig. 3 Expansion of SCC specimens after 54 weeks of immersion in the ammonium sulphate solution
985
ammonium sulphate solution for 54 weeks. Specimens from all SCC mixtures initially had a slight gain
in mass followed by a decreasing trend at advanced
stages of the test. The final mass for some specimens
was slightly lower than the corresponding initial value
before exposure (maximum mass loss of 1%), but no
severe mass loss was observed. The trends of mass
change primarily depended on the cementitious materials type with marginal effects of S/A and fibre
inclusion. Generally, the prismatic specimens (larger
in size) had a similar trend of mass change, but with
lower rate compared to that of the corresponding
cylindrical specimens. This behaviour is ascribed to
the relative difference in size since the cylindrical
specimens had a surface-to-volume ratio that is 10%
larger than that of the prismatic specimens. This is
supported by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for
the mass change at the end of exposure (54 weeks).
For instance, at a significance level a = 0.05,
ANOVA of the mass change of specimens from group
B mixtures at S/A of 40% shows that the difference in
surface-to-volume ratio between cylindrical and prismatic specimens had an F value of 23.2, which is
larger than the corresponding critical F value of 4.4.
According to Montgomery [22], in this statistical
approach of random variables, exceeding the critical
value for an F-distribution density function reflects
that the tested variable affects the mean of results.
In group B mixtures, the B specimens (B2-A-40 and
B2-A-60), which showed the highest reduction in REd
with significant expansion, did not yield severe mass
loss. This may suggest that degradation consisted of
cracking and softening rather than surface scaling.
10
SRPC
A1-N-50
A2-N-50
A3-N-50
A4-N-50
A5-N-50
RC (%)
RF (%)
Group A
SRPC
67
86
A1-N-50
45
89
A2-N-50
49
74
A3-N-50
90
85
A4-N-50
42
97
A5-N-50
52
93
B1-A-40
44
95
B1-A-60
39
82
B2-A-40
31
B2-A-60
B3-A-40
56
79
B3-A-60
53
91
B4-A-40
B4-A-60
66
62
84
91
B5-A-40
71
90
B5-A-60
95
79
C1-A-S
49
33
C1-A-P
63
38
C1-A-H
50
33
C2-A-H
49
52
C3-A-H
53
36
C4-A-H
117
50
C5-A-H
86
42
Group B
Group C
4
2
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
Time (Weeks)
986
4 Discussion
The ammonium sulphate solution had deleterious
effects on the SCC specimens from the various
mixtures tested. The trends of mass change suggest
that the first stage of exposure to the ammonium
sulphate solution involved progressive absorption of
the solution and formation of reaction products, which
generally led to mass gain. Subsequently, dissolution
of the cementitious matrix and removal of reaction
products led to mass decrease, but at different rates
depending on the type of binder used. Fracture
surfaces from specimens subjected to flexural strength
tests were immediately sprayed with 1 N phenolphthalein solution to detect the depth of reduction in
alkalinity, as shown in Fig. 5. This depth ranged from
4 to 10 mm depending on the type of binder. However,
the zone of reduced alkalinity may or may not serve as
a protective zone, which can reduce the rate of
Reduction of alkalinity
987
Fig. 6 SEM micrographs and associated EDX spectra after 54 weeks of exposure to ammonium sulphate showing a gypsum in outer
surface and b secondary ettringite growing in air voids
ternary and quaternary binder mixtures were significantly less than that of the control and binary mixtures.
Thereby, the ternary and quaternary binder mixtures
had limited CH contents available for the acidbase
reaction compared to that of the control and binary
mixtures. In general, the replacement of OPC with
higher dosages of SCMs has a dilution effect of
reducing the portlandite and C3A contents in the
hydrated cementitious matrix, which decreased the
rate of formation of gypsum and ettringite, leading to
lower swelling relative to the control (100% OPC) and
binary (92% OPC ? 8% SF) cementitious systems.
988
70
63.6
60
Enthalpy (J/g)
52.65
50
40
37.31
30
18.87
18.62
20
11.48
A1-N-50
A2-N-50
A3-N-50
A4-N-50
A5-N-50
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
10
0
SRPC
0.2
A1-N-50
SRPC
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature (C)
Fig. 8 DSC curves for 100% OPC and SRPC specimens after
54 weeks of exposure to ammonium sulphate
-0.8
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Temperature (C)
989
(b)
(c)
Passivating layer
(a)
Fig. 10 Fracture cross-sections of specimens made from a single, b binary, and c quaternary binders
990
Fig. 12 SEM micrographs for the passivating layer in Q specimens: a B5-A-60 and b C4-A-H
991
992
cross-sectional area over the middle-third span subjected to the maximum bending moment. In addition,
the residual strength is influenced by the crosssectional area of the sound concrete core of the
specimen or the effective-cross sectional area. Considering the cross-sectional area of the sound core
instead of the initial cross-sectional area, the strength
after exposure can be higher than its initial value. In
addition, in chemical immersion tests, there are two
processes with conflicting effects simultaneously
occurring in the cementitious matrix: decomposition
of the surface and continual hydration/densification of
the core (bulk cross-section). With the existence of a
passivating layer, the latter can cause strength increase
in the core, particularly for binders comprising high
dosages of SCMs that exhibit long-term strength gain.
Hence, in evaluating the deterioration of cement-based
materials in acidic media, compressive or flexural
strength loss should be interpreted with care in light of
other performance parameters.
Under attack by ammonium sulphate, the damage
to concrete is of a dissolution type accompanied by
expansion and cracking. Hence, multiple parameters
should be corroborated to draw reliable conclusions.
In the present study, the change in mass was an
insignificant indicator of damage. The changes in
length, REd, and to a less extent the relative compressive and flexural strengths, along with thermal analysis
by DSC and micro-analysis by SEM supported by
EDX gave a more comprehensive evaluation of the
performance of SCC under such a type of chemical
attack. This approach discounted the limitations of
each individual test from the overall evaluation of the
performance of SCC mixtures. Based on the present
study, the following qualitative failure limits may be
suggested as damage indicators for similar highperformance concretes under the attack of aggressive
ammonium sulphate: a maximum expansion of 0.2%,
a minimum relative dynamic modulus of elasticity
(REd) of 60%, and a minimum RF strength of 65%.
Such proposed limits can be refined in future research
to establish performance-based specifications for
concrete exposed to ammonium sulphate.
5 Concluding remarks
With the growing use of SCC in various infrastructure
applications exposed to ammonium sulphate, it has
993
References
1. Zhu W, Bartos J (2003) Permeation properties of selfcompacting concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(6):921926
2. Boel V, Audenaert K, De Schutter G, Heirman G, Vandewalle L, Desmet B, Vantomme J (2007) Transport properties of self compacting concrete with limestone filler and
fly ash. Mater Struct 40(5):507516
3. Hewlett PC (ed) (1998) Leas chemistry of cement and
concrete. Arnold, London
4. Skalny J, Marchand J, Odler I (2002) Sulfate attack on
concrete. Spon Press, London
5. Rols S, Ambroise J, Pera J, Chabannet M (2000) Calcined
paper sludge-pozzolanic admixture to improve sulfate
resistance of concrete. In: Malhotra VM (ed) Proceedings of
the fifth CANMET/ACI international conference on durability of concrete, Barcelona, Spain, ACI SP-192, vol I,
pp 353367
6. Nagele E, Hillemeier B, Hilsdorf H (1984) Attack of
ammonium salt solutions of concrete. Betonwerk FertigteilTechnik 50(11):742751
7. Rendell F, Jauberthie R (1999) The deterioration of mortar in
sulphate environments. Constr Build Mater 13(6):321327
8. Madej J (1992) Corrosion resistance of normal and silica
fume-modified mortars made from different types of
cement. In: Malhotra VM (ed) Proceedings the fourth
CANMET/ACI international conference on fly ash, silica
fume, slag, and natural pozzolans in concrete, Istanbul,
Turkey, ACI SP-132, vol II, pp 11891207
9. Mehta PK (1985) Studies on chemical resistance of low
water/cement ratio concrete. Cem Concr Res 15(6):969978
10. Miletic S, Ilic M, Ranogajec J, Marinovic-Neducin R,
Djuric M (1998) Portland ash cement degradation in
ammonium-sulfate solution. Cem Concr Res 28(5):713725
11. Mbessa M, Pera J (2001) Durability of high-strength concrete in ammonium sulfate solution. Cem Concr Res 31(8):
12271231
12. Nehdi M, Pardhan M, Koshowski S (2004) Durability of
self-consolidating concrete incorporating high-volume
replacement composite cements. Cem Concr Res 34(11):
21032112
994
13. De Schutter G, Audenaert K (eds) (2007) Durability of selfcompacting concrete, State-of-the-art report of RILEM
Technical Committee 205-DSC. RILEM Report 38, RILEM
Publications S.A.R.L., p 185
14. BIBM, CEMBUREAU, ERMCO, EFCA, EFNARC (2005)
The European guidelines for self-compacting concrete,
p 63. www.efnarc.org
15. American Society for Testing and Materials (2007) ASTM
C 192: practice for making and curing concrete test specimens in the laboratory, vol 4.02. American Society for
Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
16. American Society for Testing and Materials (2007) ASTM C
1012: standard test method for length change of hydrauliccement mortar exposed to a sulfate solution, vol 4.01. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
17. Mehta PK (1992) Sulfate attack on concretea review. In:
Skalny J (ed) Materials science of concrete III. The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, pp 105130
18. American Society for Testing and Materials (2007) ASTM
C 39: standard test method for compressive strength of
cylindrical concrete specimens, vol 4.02. American Society
for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
19. American Society for Testing and Materials (2007) ASTM
C 215: standard test method for fundamental transverse,
longitudinal, and torsional resonant frequencies of concrete
specimens, vol 4.02, West Conshohocken, PA
20. American Society for Testing and Materials (2007) ASTM
C 666: standard test method for resistance of concrete to
rapid freezing and thawing, vol 4.02. American Society for
Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken