Professional Documents
Culture Documents
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Association for the Study of African American Life and History, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to The Journal of Negro History.
http://www.jstor.org
THE
JOURNAL
OF
NEGRO
HISTORY
OCTOBER, 1969
328
AFRICANS
ENSLAVED
IN
THE
NEW
WORLD
329
Mexico, Central America, Columbia, and Venezuela purchased the great bulk of Upper Guinea captives. On the
24th Sept 1561, a license was granted to Herman Vasquez
of Mexico to take 1,000 slaves from Cape Verde. In fact,
in 1576 a petition from the colonists of New Andalucia
(Venezuela) actually detailed the ethnicgroups withinUpper
Guinea from among whom they wanted the slaves recruited.4
Anothercolonial petitionfromSanta Fe in 1595 implied that
there was some rivalry between differentlocalities in Columbia for Upper Guinea slaves, since the writer wanted these
Africans to be directedinland to the miningareas ratherthan
remain in Cartagena. The purchasers at the mines were
prepared to pay for each Upper Guinea captive the sum of
150 ducats, while in the city of Cartagena the price ranged
between 100 and 120 ducats.5Because they were paid in gold
and silver, Portuguese authorities and interested merchants
both in Lisbon and in Santiago expressed a preferencefor the
Spanish American market and concentrated their effortsin
fulfillingits needs.
Before the middle of the seventeenthcentury,plantation
slavery was not prevalent in the New World, and the West
African coast was not deeply involved in slave trading.
For instance, the long stretch of coast from Cape Mount
to the Volta River was virtually untouched by slavers.
Since both the points of supply and those using slave labour
were then limited, this early cycle of the Atlantic slave
trade was relatively uncomplicated in regard to the identificationof origins and destinations.Upper Guinea relations
with Spanish America were peculiarly exclusive. On the
hand, Upper Guinea Africans went scarcely anywhere except
to northernSouth America, Central America and Mexico. On
the other hand, the above-mentionedregions of the Americas
received slaves from virtually no place other than Upper
Guinea. When in 1563 the House of Trade in Seville started
issuing registers authorizing ships to transport an agreed
4 G. Aguirre Beltran, La Poblacidn Negra de Mexico, 1519-1810, Mexico
1946, p. 12; Federico Brito Figueroa, La Estructura Economica de Venezuela
Colonial, Caracas, 1963, p. 113.
5 Archivo General de las Indias (A.G.I.), Santa Fe, 17; Antonio Gonzalez,
20 Feb., 1595.
330
AFRICANS
ENSLAVED
IN
THE
NEW
WORLD
331
332
333
334
JOURNAL
OF NEGRO
HISTORY
AFRICANS
ENSLAVED
IN
THE
NEW
WORLD
335
ally taken the name 'Mandinga', while converselythe Mandinga had become 'naturalized' (sic).17 Later on, an officialof
the French Senegal Company reported that slaves from the
Gambia had become merchantable because of "war, crime,
sorcery or the fact of belonging to a subject race" 18 It can
be demonstratedthat the last category was inclusive of the
firstthree. Charges of sorcery and other criminal offences
were pressed against the imperfectlyassimilated subjects,
while wars were conducted against neighbouring peoples
(like the Bassarel) on the ground that they were disloyal
subjects. In this instance, therefore,a close association with
the African situation adds an unsuspected and a significant
element to the inventoryof Upper Guinea groups reaching
the New World.
As a corollary,it is equally importantto notice that many
individuals in Spanish America were incorrectlydesignated
as Mandinga. In the seventeenthcentury,a few discerning
observers did notice that the supposed Mandinga population
on the Gambia was not homogenous. For instance, Richard
Jobson found that on the upper Gambia the language spoken
by "the better sort" was Mandinga, but that the common
people had their own language. This must also have been true
much closer to the estuary, as in the kingdom of Salum,
where the ruling strata was penetrated by Manding, but the
citizens were Wolof, Fula, and Serer. Once a subject or a
victim of Mandinga hegemonyhad been shipped by Europeans under the mistaken impression that the captive was
Mandinga, then the mistake might well have been carried
throughas a positive deception on the part of the enslaved
individuals, for one consequence of Mandinga supremacywas
that other groups were constantly seeking to attach themselves to and 'pass' as Mandinga.
There were other positive reasons why few Mandinga
were shipped to the Americas. They were the ruling elite-the
clans and castes possessing a monopoly of skills such as
ironworkingand weaving. Even clans who were of lesser
17D. Peres, Duas Descrig3es Seiscentistas da Guine de Lemos Azevedo
Coelho, Bissau, 1953, pp. 25, 117, 134.
18 P. Cultru, Premier Voyage de Sieur de la Courbe fait a la Coste
d'Afrique
en 1685, Paris, 1906, p. 194.
336
337
impact in Spanish America was not a reflectionon their numbers, but rather on cultural factors reaching back into their
African past. Similar enquiries have suggested that Fon cultural dominance in Haiti did not correspond to numerical
preponderance,but that primacyin Jamaica was aided by the
high proportion of Africans carried to the island.22Knowledge of the proportion of Africans of differentregions does
not therefore immediately allow one to draw valid conclusions about cultural survivals, but it at least opens the way
for an enquiryinto the dynamics of New World slave culture
and the way in which African elements were incorporated.
On the other hand, it is often meaningless to distinguish
between one African and another in a slave context,and in
some instances it is positively misleading to harp on the
"tribal origins" of black slaves in the New World. This is the
principal point borne out by an examination of the close
relationsbetweenUpper Guinea and Spanish America.
Sierra Leone had innumerabletribal and political groupings, and yet a sixteenth-century
European observer appreciated that "all these nations are called in general 'Sapes', in
the same way that in Spain several nations are called "Spaniards." Like the Akan of Ghana, the Sapi constituteda single
language cluster,whichwas part of the West Atlanticfamily.23
Their linguistic grouping is termed 'Mel', and a few Mande
(Susu and Djalonke) had also become acculturatedwithinthe
same milieu as the 'Mel' speakers. It was claimed in the
sixteenth century that every Sapi understood every other
Sapi. This is not to be taken literally,but there was mutual
understanding based on a common socio-political structure
and on similar economic,religious, and educational activities.
Aguirre Beltran, in his discussion of the tribal origins of
Africans carried to Mexico, noted that Sapi was a generic
name referringto several Upper Guinea peoples.24What he
failed to perceive was that the very existence of a culture
entitysuch as the Sapi was a challenge to his preconception
22 (a) A. Ramos, Os Culturas Negras no Novo Mundo, 1946, p. 165. (b)
Orlando Patterson, The Sociology of Slavery, London, 1967, p. 153.
23 P. E. H. Hair, "An Ethnolinguistic Inventory of the Upper Guinea Coast
before 1700", African Language Review, Vol. 6, 1967.
24 G. Aguirre Beltran, "Tribal Origins of Slaves in Mexico" Journal of
Negro History, Vol. XLII, 1957.
338
JOURNAL
OF NEGRO
HISTORY
339
340
accurate and decisive as far as slave procurementwas concerned. It was said that the Bijago men were prone to commit
suicide as a last resort when captured, and thereforePortuguese traders on the coast avoided them.28Besides, Labat
reported that the Bijago were noted for rebellion on board
ship and were sold with great difficultybecause of their
ferocityand tendencyto escape, harm themselves,or commit
suicide.29This is really an unusual situationbecause, in general, the supposedly adverse tribal characteristicsdid not stop
European slave traders from purchasing whomever was
offeredto themin Africa,nor did it preventEuropeans in the
Americas from grabbing any serviceable African, especially
since labour was chronically short. Indeed, it is when one
pursues the question of tribal characteristics within New
World society that one findsthe greatest inconsistenciesand
contradictions.
When a preferencefor a given set of black slaves did exist
in the Americas, it was tied to practical considerations, as
was the case on the African coast. Upper Guinea captives
were undoubtedlypreferredin large areas of Spanish America. The reason seems to be that the Guinea of Cape Verde
was the first region with which the Spanish American
slaveowners had constant organized contact, with a few
Spanish Americans moving to reside in Upper Guinea and
several Portuguese serving as agents in Mexico, Cartagena,
and Panama.30 This kind of organization clearly had mutual
benefits,for slavers and slaveowners were informedand more
solicitous of their own needs. There would obviously have
been far greater opportunityto provide Upper Guinea captives in the required volume, with regularity,and in good
physical condition,as distinctfromAngola (which, up to the
firstdecade of the seventeenthcentury,was supplying Spanish America occasionally and incidentalto theirmain Brazilian interest). To some extent, also, practice seemed to have
established precedent, familiarity,and confidence; and the
28Alvares de Almada, "Tratado Breve dos Rios de Guine," Monumenta
Missionaria Africana Africa Ocidental, 1569-1700 (2nd series, vol. III, Ed.
A. Brasio), p. 318.
29 J. B. Labat, Op cit, vol.
V, p. 198.
80 A.H.U., Guin6, caixa I, No. 54, Petition of June 1647, and A.G.I., Santa
F6 37, report of 10th July 1590.
AFRICANS
ENSLAVED
IN
THE
NEW
WORLD
341
342
AFRICANS
ENSLAVED
IN
THE
NEW
WORLD
343
344
345
WALTER RODNEY