Notice 10 U.S.C. 333 Interference With State and Federal Law

Filing # 22402581 E-Filed 01/09/2015 08:21:34 PM
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA
IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY
CASE NO.: 2013-CA-000115
42-2013-CA-000115-AXXX-XX
Plaintiff,
vs.
NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE
AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GILLESPIE
FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997, ET AL.
________________________________________/
DEFENDANTS 20 DAYS NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF TO FILE NONRESIDENT BOND
Under 57.011, Fla. Stat. Defendants may move for dismissal after 20 days
Defendants Notice Under 10 U.S.C. 333, Interference with State and Federal law
Defendant(s) NEIL J. GILLESPIE, henceforth in the first person, an indigent, disabled
nonlawyer reluctantly appearing pro se for himself and his interests as TRUSTEE of THE
GILLESPIE FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997 (Trust), gives
notice to the Plaintiff under F.S. 57.011 nonresident bond, and the Court per 10 U.S.C. 333:
1.
The Court and Judge Stancil have a duty and authority under the Florida Trust Code,
Chapter 736, Florida Statutes, Part III, Representation, 736.0305, to appoint a representative
once he determined I could not represent the Trust because I was not a lawyer. Judge Stacil also
has a duty and authority to appoint a representative to represent the interest of unknown parties
to the Trust. ( 736.0305). Because Judge Stancil said December 18, 2014 in open court only a
lawyer can represent the Trust, the appointed representative must be a lawyer.
736.0305 Appointment of representative. (NOTE: Judge Stancil was required to appoint a
representative for the Unknown Settlors/Beneficiaries of the Gillespie Trust (a lawyer); and the
same representative (a lawyer) also could represent me, 736.0305(1); and construed for ADA).
(1) If the court determines that an interest is not represented under this part, or that the
otherwise available representation might be inadequate, the court may appoint a
Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Defendants Notice, 10 U.S.C. 333, Interference with State and Federal law
Jan-09-2015
representative to receive notice, give consent, and otherwise represent, bind, and act on
behalf of a minor, incapacitated, or unborn individual, or a person whose identity or
location is unknown. If not precluded by a conflict of interest, a representative may be
appointed to represent several persons or interests.
(2) A representative may act on behalf of the individual represented with respect to any
matter arising under this code, whether or not a judicial proceeding concerning the trust
is pending.
(3) In making decisions, a representative may consider general benefits accruing to the
living members of the represented individuals family.
2.
Judge Stancil failed to appoint the required representatives under 736.0305, which he
determined must be a lawyer. Therefore I reluctantly appear pro se by authority under the Florida
Trust Code, Chapter 736, Florida Statutes, Part III, Representation.
3.
The Plaintiff is a nonresident corporation of the State of Delaware, according to records
of the Florida Division of Corporations that accompany this pleading.

4.
Under 57.011, Fla. Stat. if a plaintiff is a nonresident corporation, it must comply with
the condition precedent of filing a nonresident bond, upon commencement of the action. If the
plaintiff has failed to file the requisite bond within 30 days after commencement, the defendant
may move for dismissal after 20 days notice to plaintiff.
57.011 Costs; security by nonresidents.When a nonresident plaintiff begins an action
or when a plaintiff after beginning an action removes himself or herself or his or her
effects from the state, he or she shall file a bond with surety to be approved by the clerk
of $100, conditioned to pay all costs which may be adjudged against him or her in said
action in the court in which the action is brought. On failure to file such bond within 30
days after such commencement or such removal, the defendant may, after 20 days notice
to plaintiff (during which the plaintiff may file such bond), move to dismiss the action or
may hold the attorney bringing or prosecuting the action liable for said costs and if they
are adjudged against plaintiff, an execution shall issue against said attorney.
5.
The Clerk, by and thought counsel Gregory C. Harrell, informed me by email Thursday,
January 08, 2015 11:14 AM (Exhibit A) that the Plaintiff has not filed a nonresident bond:
1-The court file contains no record of the plaintiff having filed a nonresident bond to date;

6.
Jan-09-2015
The Defendants hereby give 20 days notice to the Plaintiff that the Defendants shall
move to dismiss this action as provided by 57.011, Fla. Stat.

7.
Exhibit B shows the summons returned served on Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie
as Co-Trustee of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 1997. The
return of service is defective on its face because Mark Gillespie Co-Trustee was not served at all.
NOTE: See DEFENDANTS MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS, And Motion to
Cancel CMC Hearing December 18, 2014 on Plaintiffs Motion To Set A Case Management
Conference filed December 17, 2014 that shows inter alia I was not properly served personally.
8.
The Florida Trust Code, Chapter 736, Florida Statutes, Part II, Judicial Proceedings,
governs service of process on trusts, see 736.02025 Service of process. The Plaintiff failed to
properly serve Co-Trustees under 736.02025. There is no provision for joint service of process,
which is incomplete anyway. Other legal entities like a corporation may be subject to service of
process on a registered agent, but there is no provision permitting joint service of process for me
and brother as Co-Trustee. Mark Gillespie was not served as Co-Trustee, therefore service of
process was not perfected on him as Co-Trustee as attempted in this defective joint summons.
9.
I first raised this issue in my Motion to Dismiss, paragraph 111 and paragraph 112:
INSUFFICIENCY OF PROCESS
Rule 1.140(b)(4), Fla. R. Civ. P.
111. Conditions precedent were not met. The Plaintiff failed to give notice to Mark
Gillespie Co-Trustee of The Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February
10, 1997 of Notice of Default and Intent to Foreclose as required by the Note, paragraph,
9 Giving Notices.
INSUFFICIENCY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS, MISJOINDER
Rule 1.140(b)(5), Fla. R. Civ. P
112. Defendant Neil J. Gillespie Co-Trustee of the Gillespie Family Living Trust
Agreement dated February 10, 1997, is misjoined on the same summons as Defendant

Jan-09-2015
Mark Gillespie Co-Trustee of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement dated
February 10, 1997. Each co-trustee should be served separately and personally. The
summons states as follows:
Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie Family Living Trust
Agreement dated February 10, 1997
8092 SW 115TH LOOP
OCALA, FL 34481
Mark Gillespie is a resident of Texas, but was wrongly served at the property address in
Ocala Florida in a misjoined summons. Mark Gillespie co-trustee was not personally
served.
10.
It is well settled that a Plaintiff must strictly comply with the statutory requirements for
service of process under Fla. Stat. 48.031(1)(a), 48.031(5), and 48.22, otherwise service of
process is improper. Fla. Stat. 48.22 Cumulative to other laws.All provisions of this chapter
are cumulative to other provisions of law or rules of court about service of process, and all other
provisions about service of process are cumulative to this chapter, i.e., 736.02025.
11.
Service of process must strictly comply with all relevant statutory provisions. Walker v.
Fifth Third Mortgage Company, 2012 WL 5457220, No. 5D12-3187 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App.
2012) citing Shurman v. Atlantic Mortgage & Investment Corp. (Fla. 2001) (holding that
"statutes governing service of process are to be strictly construed and enforced") see also ReEmployment Services, Ltd v. National Acquisitions Co., 969 So. 2d 467 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App.
2007) (holding that "courts require strict construction of, and compliance with, the provisions of
statutes governing service of process").
12.
The Plaintiff has failed to strictly comply with Fla. Stat. 48.031(5) therefore service of
process on Defendants,
Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie
Family Living Trust Agreement dated February 10, 1997
must be quashed.

13.
Jan-09-2015
Pursuant to Fla. Stat. 48.031(5), a person serving process shall place, on the copy
served, the date and time of service and his or her identification number and initials for all
service of process. Mark Gillespie Co-Trustee was not served. Therefore service of process on
Defendants,
must be quashed. Fla. Stat. 48.031(5) is properly satisfied when the process server places the
date and time of service and his or her identification number and initials on the copy of the
summons served. Mark Gillespie Co-Trustee was not served. Therefore service of process on
Defendants,
must be quashed. Nirk v. Bank of America N.A., 94 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 4th Dist. Ct. App. 2012).
Failure to do so renders service improper. Vidal v. Suntrust Bank, 41 So. 3d 401 (Fla. 4th Dist.
Ct. App. 2010) see also Walker v. Fifth Third Mortgage Company, 2012 WL 5457220, No.
5D12-3187 (Fla. 5th Dist. Ct. App. 2012).
14.
The party seeking to invoke the courts jurisdiction has the burden to prove the validity
of service of process. Torres v. Arnco Constr., Inc., 867 So. 2d 583, 587 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).
15.
Because Plaintiff failed to strictly comply with the requirements of Fla. Stat. 48.031(5),
service of process for Mark Gillespie Co-Trustee, service of process on Defendants,

must be quashed. Vidal, 41 So. 3d 401; see also Gamboa v. Jones, 455 So. 2d 6] 3 (Fla. 3d Dist.
Ct. App. 1984).

16.
Jan-09-2015
The Plaintiff sued the wrong party in suing Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie as Co-
Trustee of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 1997, see the
Foreclosure Benchbook 2013 Parties to the Foreclosure Action, Necessary and Proper
Defendants on page 16:
1. The owner of the fee simple title - only indispensable party defendant to a foreclosure
action. English v. Bankers Trust Co. of Calif., N.A., 895 So. 2d 1120, 1121 (Fla. 4th
DCA 2005). Foreclosure is void if titleholder omitted...
The titleholder is the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement Dated February 10, 1997. The
Plaintiff failed to sue the only indispensable party. Therefore, the foreclosure is void.
17.
The Plaintiff wrongly designated this action a commercial foreclosure on the civil cover
sheet (form 1.997) completed and filed by the Plaintiffs counsel. Exhibit C.
18.
A Certified: A True Copy of the 2015 property card for my residential Florida
homestead currently in foreclosure in this action, sistus 8092 SW 115th Loop, Ocala, Florida
34481, Exhibit D, prepared by a Deputy acting for Villie M. Smith, CFA ASA Property
Appraiser Marion County, FL, proves:
My property is a SFR - Single Family Residence, code 01 Family Residence
My Property is NOT a commercial property.
My property is a residential homestead property, and received the exemptions shown
below totaling $50,500.
Code
01
35
38
Type of Exemption
Homestead exemption $25,000
Disability - Civilian $500
Additional $25,000
Exhibit E shows a guide to the current exemption codes used by the Property Appraiser's Office.
19.
If necessary, a hearing must be held to determine that my home is a residential property,
with expert testimony of Villie M. Smith, CFA ASA Property Appraiser Marion County.

20.
Jan-09-2015
Therefore any foreclosure of my residential homestead property must be designated a
residential foreclosure on the civil cover sheet (form 1.997), and not a commercial foreclosure as
completed and filed by the Plaintiffs counsel. Exhibit C.
21.
Under Rule 1.100(c)(2) ...all proceedings in the action shall be abated until a properly
executed cover sheet is completed and filed.... Rule 1.100(c)(2) Pleadings and Motions.
(2) A civil cover sheet (form 1.997) shall be completed and filed with the clerk at the
time an initial complaint or petition is filed by the party initiating the action. If the cover
sheet is not filed, the clerk shall accept the complaint or petition for filing; but all
proceedings in the action shall be abated until a properly executed cover sheet is
completed and filed. The clerk shall complete the civil cover sheet for a party appearing
pro se.
22.
Currently the civil cover sheet (form 1.997) is not properly executed as completed and
filed. Rule 1.100(c)(2). Therfore, ...all proceedings in the action shall be abated until a properly
executed cover sheet is completed and filed..
23.
I am a disabled consumer of legal and court services affecting interstate commerce. I
sought and was denied disability accommodation, my ADA Title II request submitted December
10, 2014 to the Fifth Judicial Circuit, by and through the omission and failure to respond by
Grace A. Fagen, Fifth Circuit General Counsel and ADA Coordinator, and Tameka Gordon,
Marion County ADA Coordinator, that denied me access legal and court services in this action in
an effective and expeditious manner, as required by the Constitution and laws of the United
States of America, and the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida, including,
The Florida Constitution,
SECTION 21. Access to courts.The courts shall be open to every person for redress of
any injury, and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay.
SECTION 9. Due process.No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property
without due process of law, or be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense, or be
compelled in any criminal matter to be a witness against oneself.

Jan-09-2015
SECTION 2. Basic rights.All natural persons, female and male alike, are equal before
the law and have inalienable rights, among which are the right to enjoy and defend life
and liberty, to pursue happiness, to be rewarded for industry, and to acquire, possess and
protect property; except that the ownership, inheritance, disposition and possession of
real property by aliens ineligible for citizenship may be regulated or prohibited by law.
No person shall be deprived of any right because of race, religion, national origin, or
physical disability.
and,
Section 29.007, Florida Statutes, Court-appointed counsel
Section 27.40(1), Florida Statutes Court-appointed counsel...
The Florida Trust Code, Chapter 736, Florida Statutes, Part II, Judicial Proceedings
The Florida Trust Code, Chapter 736, Florida Statutes, Part III, Representation
Section 825.101(3), Florida Statutes. Abuse and Exploitation of Disabled Adults
Accessibility of Information and Technology, F.S. 282.601 - 282.606, Part II
Florida Bar Rule 4-8.4(d): A lawyer shall not engage in conduct in connection with the
practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly,
or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against
litigantson any basis, including, but not limited to disability.
Florida Bar Rule 4-1.14 Client Under A Disability - Comment - Rules of procedure in
litigation generally provide that minors or persons suffering mental disability shall be
represented by a guardian or next friend if they do not have a general guardian.
and federal law,
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, right to redress of grievances.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the
press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances
The Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,
The Due Process Clause prohibits state and local government officials from
depriving persons of life, liberty, or property without legislative authorization.
The Equal Protection Clause requires each state to provide equal protection
under the law to all people within its jurisdiction
Privileges or Immunities Clause
The Privileges and Immunities Clause

Jan-09-2015
The Supremacy Clause

Provision in Article Six, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution that establishes the United
States Constitution, federal statutes, and treaties as "the supreme law of the land."
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance
thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United
States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be
bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary
notwithstanding.
International Law Relating to Appointment of Counsel in Civil Proceedings, See attached,
Legal aid, a right in itself UN Special Rapporteur - Geneva (30 May 2013) Exhibit I.
Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (for due process, counsel in any case, civil or criminal)
The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et. seq.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.
The ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (ADAAA).
The federal Fair Housing Act, contained within Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of
1968, provides that "[a]n aggrieved person may commence a civil action in an
appropriate United States district court or State court." 42 U.S.C. 3613 (a)(1)(A).
Further, "[u]pon application by a person alleging a discriminatory housing practice or a
person against whom such a practice is alleged, the court may-- (1) appoint an attorney
for such person." 42 U.S.C. 3613(b).
24.
The Marion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller, the Marion County Circuit Court, and
the Fifth Judicial Circuit of Florida, are each a public entity under Title II, the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), as amended, 42 U.S.C 12131.
42 U.S.C 12131(1) Public entity
The term public entity means
(A) any State or local government;
(B) any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a
State or States or local government; and
The ADA, as amended, Findings and purpose, 42 USC 12101, set out in full at Exhibit F.
(a) Findings
The Congress finds that

Jan-09-2015
(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a persons right to fully

participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental
disabilities have been precluded from doing so because of discrimination; others
who have a record of a disability or are regarded as having a disability also have
been subjected to discrimination; Set out in full, attached
The ADA, as amended, - Definition of disability, 42 USC 12102, set out in full at Exhibit G.
(1) Disability
The term disability means, with respect to an individual
(A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more
major life activities of such individual;
(B) a record of such an impairment; or
(C) being regarded as having such an impairment...Set out in full, attached
The ADA, as amended, - State immunity, 42 USC 12202, set out in full at Exhibit H.
A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the
United States from an action in a Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a
violation of this chapter. In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements
of this chapter, remedies (including remedies both at law and in equity) are available for
such a violation to the same extent as such remedies are available for such a violation in
an action against any public or private entity other than a State.
Negligence per se. Florida Freight Terminals, Inc. v. Cabanas.
354 So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App., 3d Dist. 1978).
In connection with the requirement in wrongful death actions [or in disability actions] of
an underlying tort or breach of duty, proof of the defendants violation of a statute or
regulatory provision that either is designed to protect a particular class of persons from
their inability to protect themselves or establishes a duty to take precautions to guard a
certain class of persons from a specific type of injury, establishes negligence per se. 354
So. 2d 1222 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App., 3d Dist. 1978).
Eggshell skull rule:
Doctrine that makes a defendant liable for the plaintiff's unforeseeable and uncommon
reactions to the defendant's negligent or intentional tort. If the defendant commits a tort
against the plaintiff without a complete defense, the defendant becomes liable for any
injury that is magnified by the plaintiff's peculiar characteristics.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/eggshell_skull_rule
25.
There is evidence of persistent support for the Confederacy, and its white supremacy
racism, in Marion County Florida, and law enforcement in the Ku Klux Klan in Lake County.
10

26.
Jan-09-2015
The Marion County Board of County Commissioners issued a Proclamation of
Confederate History Month for 2013 and 2014 that is propaganda, not history. Exhibits J & K
27.
Bay News 9 reported July 14, 2014 that Deputy Chief David Borst and Cpl. George
Hunnewell are no longer with the Fruitland Park Police Department after an FBI report linked
them to the Ku Klux Klan. Fruitville is located in Lake County Florida and is part of the Fifth
Judicial Circuit. Marion County is also part of the Fifth Judicial Circuit. Exhibit L.
http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2
014/7/14/fruitland_park_kkk_p.html
28.
Images of Confederate currency are displayed on the government website of David R.
Ellspermann, Marion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller. Exhibit M. Mr. Harrell, counsel for
the Clerk, responded to this practice with this statement:
The confederate money, images of which are on the Clerk's website, was found in
connection with our office's purging of circuit civil court and probate court files that have
met state retention requirements. The file(s) in which the money was found did not
attribute the money to any particular case, and we are not aware of any other confederate
records currently being displayed by the Clerk. Pursuant to Section 2-77 of the Marion
County Code of Ordinances, the Clerk is a member of the county historical commission.
In that role, the Clerk has taken an interest in placing images of old historical photos and
the found currency on his website. It was his decision to do so. He did not need - and,
thus, did not seek - any authorization to do so.
29.
The Ocala Star-Banner reported November 18, 2009 a public-private partnership to raise
funds to move a Confederate war statue, Johnny Reb, from the Marion County Courthouse:
On Tuesday, the County Commission appeared to reach a consensus to relocate the
statue of the Confederate infantryman, known commonly as "Johnny Reb."
That came after Ocala lawyer Lanny Curry proposed a public-private partnership to
relocate the 101-year-old monument and volunteered to help raise the estimated $25,000
needed to move it from its present location, a nook on the building's south side fronting
Northwest First Street.
To further the project, commissioners agreed to set up an account with the court clerk's
office to accept tax-exempt donations and accepted Commissioner Charlie Stone's offer
11

Jan-09-2015
to serve as a liaison to work with Curry and other parties interested in finding Johnny
Reb a new home.
30.
Public records provided show $207,497 was raised, and the account is still open, even
though Johnny Reb was moved to a final place in 2010. A number of the contributors are
lawyers. Mr. Harrell would not respond to questions about the $207,497 raised, or the account.
You are free to construe it however you see fit he wrote. The analysis is not yet complete.
31.
I believe the Confederate and KKK affiliations show White Supremacy Racism:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_supremacy
"White supremacism is the racist belief, or promotion of the belief, that white people are
superior to people of other racial backgrounds and that therefore whites should
politically, economically and socially dominate non-whites. The term is also typically
used to describe a political ideology that perpetuates and maintains the social, political,
historical and/or industrial dominance of whites..."
"White supremacy was dominant in the United States before the American Civil War and
for decades after Reconstruction.[3] In large areas of the United States, this included the
holding of non-whites (specifically African Americans) in chattel slavery. The outbreak
of the Civil War saw the desire to uphold white supremacy cited as a cause for state
secession[4] and the formation of the Confederate States of America.[5]"
32.
Judge Stancils judicial misconduct, and deprivation of my rights under color of law,
shows a situation exists under 10 U.S.C. 333, Interference with State and Federal law:
333. Interference with State and Federal law
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means,
shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any
insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the
State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or
protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities
of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to
give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the
course of justice under those laws.
12

Jan-09-2015
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the
equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
33.
Judge Stancil failed December 18, 2014 to hold a case management conference as
provided by Rule 1.200, Pretrial Procedure. Instead, Judge Stancil and Mr. Curtis of foreclosure
mill McCalla Raymer LLC conspired on a motion to hear all motions contrary to Rule 1.100(b)
that requires, All notices of hearing shall specify each motion or other matter to be heard.
34.
During the improper hearing December 18, 2014 on the foreclosure of my residential
homestead, Judge Stancil, Mr. Wilson, and McCalla Raymer LLC, denied my right to due
process by violating Rule 1.115(a) Pleading Mortgage Foreclosures, that required dismissal of
the verified complaint for failing to plead that the Plaintiff is the holder of the original note. The
Plaintiffs Verified Complaint To Foreclose Home Equity Conversion Mortgage fails to meet
the requirements of Fla. R. Civ. Pro., Rule 1.115(a),
Rule 1.115(a) Claim for Relief. A claim for relief that seeks to foreclose a mortgage or
other lien on residential real property, including individual units of condominiums and
cooperatives designed principally for occupation by one to four families which secures a
promissory note, must: (1) contain affirmative allegations expressly made by the claimant
at the time the proceeding is commenced that the claimant is the holder of the original
note secured by the mortgage; or (2) allege with specificity the factual basis by which the
claimant is a person entitled to enforce the note under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes.
35.
Nothing in the Complaint shows the Plaintiff is the holder of the original note secured
by the mortgage; Nothing in the Complaint alleges with specificity the factual basis by which
the claimant is a person entitled to enforce the note under section 673.3011, Florida Statutes.
Likewise, the Complaint failed to meet the other requirements of Rule 1.115:
(b) Delegated Claim for Relief.
(c) Possession of Original Promissory Note.
(d) Lost, Destroyed, or Stolen Instrument.
(e) Verification. (See Defendants Rule 1.150 Motion to Strike Sham Pleadings)
Therefore, the Complaint must be dismissed.
13

36.
Jan-09-2015
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, 18 U.S.C. 242: (Exhibit P)
Summary: http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/242fin.php
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to
willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of
the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by
federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done
beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official
is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons
acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers,
prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in
public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary
that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap,
familial status or national origin of the victim.
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death
penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.
WHEREFORE, 20 days Notice is given to the Plaintiff that the Defendants shall move to
dismiss this action as provided by 57.011, Fla. Stat. for failure to post a nonresident bond.
WHEREFORE, situation exists under 10 U.S.C. 333, Interference with State and
Federal law, requiring the President take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress
judicial misconduct by Judge Hale Stancil and judges like him, disability discrimination by the
Fifth Judicial Circuit, Grace Fagan, and the Florida Courts, deprivation of rights under color of
law, 18 USC 242, by foreclosure mill McCalla Raymer LLC and its lawyers, white supremacy
racism of the Confederacy by the Clerk & Marion Co. BOCC, and revival of the Ku Klux Klan.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED January 9, 2015.
Neil J. Gillespie, individually and as trustee

8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Phone: 352-854-7807
Email: neilgillespie@mfi.net
14
Appendix of Exhibits - January 9, 2015

Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Neil J. Gillespie
Case No. 2013-CA-000115, Marion County, Fifth Judicial Circuit
Exhibit A
Email January 8, 2015 of Clerk's Counsel Mr. Harrell nonresident bond
Exhibit B
Return of Service Misjoined Co-Trustee Summons not complete
Exhibit C
Plaintiffs Civil Cover Sheet 13-115-CAT Not a Commercial Foreclosure
Exhibit D
2015 Residential Property Card CERTIFIED by Property Appraiser
Exhibit E
Marion Co. Property Appraiser Exemption Codes
Exhibit F
42 USC 12101 ADA Findings and Purpose
Exhibit G
42 USC 12102 ADA Definition of Disability
Exhibit H
42 USC 12202 ADA State Immunity
Exhibit I
Legal aid, a right in itself UN Special Rapporteur
Exhibit J
2013 Marion Co. Proclamation-Confederate History Month
Exhibit K
Exhibit L
FDLE 2 Fruitland Park Police Officers in KKK Lake County
Exhibit M
Confederate currency on Marion Co. Clerk's website
Exhibit N
News Ocala Star-Banner, Johnny Reb, County Prepares to Move Nov-18-2009
Exhibit O
10 USC 333 Interference with State and Federal law
Exhibit P
DOJ deprivation of rights under color of law 18 USC 242
Certificate of Service
January 09, 2015
I hereby certify that, Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond, and
Defendants Notice, 10 U.S.C. 333, Interference with State and Federal law, was served by the
Florida Courts E-Filing Portal by email January 09, 2015 to the following names:
Arthur Lee Bentley III, United States Attorney
U.S. Attorney's Office, Middle District of Florida
400 North Tampa Street
Tampa, Florida 33602
Email Lee.Bentley@usdoj.gov
DOJ Criminal, Contact local FBI field office

http://www.justice.gov/crt/complaint/#one
The Honorable John Anthony Tomasino

Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida
Email: tomasino@flcourts.org
Mr. Tad David, General Counsel

Office of State Courts Administrator
Email: davidt@flcourts.org
The Honorable John F Harkness

Executive Director, The Florida Bar
Email: jharkness@flabar.org
The Honorable Michael L. Schneider

Executive Director and General Counsel
Judicial Qualifications Commission
Email: mschneider@floridajqc.com
The Honorable Don F. Briggs

Chief Judge, Fifth Judicial Circuit FL
Email: dbriggs@circuit5.org
The Honorable Hale R. Stancil

Marion County Circuit Court
Email: hstancil@circuit5.org
Ms. Grace A. Fagan, General Counsel

Fifth Judicial Circuit, FL, ADA Coordinator
E-mail: gfagan@circuit5.org
Ms. Tameka Gordon, ADA Coordinator

Marion County, Fifth Circuit, Florida
Email: tgordon@circuit5.org
The Honorable David R. Ellspermann

Marion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller
Email: Ellspermann@marioncountyclerk.org
Mr. Gregory C. Harrell, General Counsel for

Clerk & Comptroller David R. Ellspermann
Email: GHarrell@marioncountyclerk.org
Mr. Curtis Wilson, Esq.

McCalla Raymer, LLC
225 E. Robinson Street, Ste. 660
Orlando, FL 32801
Email: MRService@mccallaraymer.com
Ms. Colleen Murphy Davis, AUSA

400 N. Tampa Street, Suite 3200
Tampa, FL 33602
Email: USAFLM.State.Foreclosures@usdoj.gov
Oak Run Homeowners Association, Inc.

Registered Agent Paul Pike
11665 SW 72ND CIRCLE
OCALA, FL 34476
c/o ORHA President
Email: orha.ocala@gmail.com
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights

Disability Rights, ADA.complaint@usdoj.gov
Development & Construction Corporation of America,

c/o Carol Olson, Vice President of Administration,
and Secretary-Treasurer, for RA Priya Ghumman
10983 SW 89 Avenue
Ocala, FL 34481
Email: colson@deccahomes.com

Jan-09-2015
Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie Family Living Trust
Agreement dated February 10, 1997
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Email: mark.gillespie@att.net
Neil J. Gillespie
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481
Mark Gillespie
7504 Summer Meadows Drive
Ft. Worth, TX 76123
Unknown spouse of Mark Gillespie n/k/a Joetta Gillespie

7504 Summer Meadows Drive
Ft. Worth, TX 76123
Unknown Settlors/Beneficiaries of The Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement dated
February 10, 1997
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, FL 34481, Email: neilgillespie@mfi.net
Elizabeth Bauerle n/k/a Elizabeth Bidwood
7504 Summer Meadow Drive
Ft. Worth, TX 76123
Unknown spouse of Elizabeth Bauerle

6356 SW 106th Place
Ocala, FL 34476
Ms. Jane Bond, Managing Partner

McCalla Raymer LLC
Email: jane.bond@mccallaraymer.com
Ms. Robyn Katz, Managing Partner

McCalla Raymer LLC
Email: rrk@mccallaraymer.com
Ms. Patricia Ann Toro Savitz

The Florida Bar
Email: psavitz@flabar.org
Mr. Barry R. Davidson (for Respondent)

Hunton & Williams LLP
Email: bdavidson@hunton.com
Mr. Jon M. Oden, Investigating Member

Ball Janik L.L.P.
Email: joden@balljanik.com
Mr. Frank H. Killgore Jr., Investigating Member

Killgore, Pearlman, Stamp, Ornstein & Squires
Email: fhkillgore@kpsos.com
Mr. Robert J. Stovash, Chair

Stovash, Case & Tingley, P.A.
Email: rstovash@sctlaw.com
Public Information Office

Florida Courts
publicinformation@flcourts.org
Florida Governor Rick Scott

Office of the Florida Governor
Email: Rick.Scott@eog.myflorida.com
Florida CFO Jeff Atwater

Office of the Chief Financial Officer
Email: Jeff.Atwater@myfloridacfo.com

Jan-09-2015
Attorney General Pam Bondi

Office of the Attorney General
Email: pam.bondi@myfloridalegal.com
Commissioner Adam Putnam

Fla. Dept. of Agriculture & Consumer Serv.
Email: Adam.Putnam@freshfromflorida.com
Gregory William Coleman

President, The Florida Bar
Email: gcoleman@bclclaw.com
Ramon A. Abadin
President-Elect, The Florida Bar
Email: ramon.abadin@sedgwicklaw.com
Adria E Quintela, Director, Lawyer

Regulation, The Florida Bar
Email: aquintel@flabar.org
John Thomas Berry, Director, Legal Division

The Florida Bar
Email: jberry@flabar.org
Paul F Hill, General Counsel

The Florida Bar
Email: phill@flabar.org
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED January 09, 2015.
NEIL J. GILLESPIE
8092 SW 115th Loop
Ocala, Florida 34481
Phone: 352-854-7807
Judge Stancil and McCalla Raymer LLC continue to serve unnecessary parties, so I do too.
Rule 2.516(a), No service need be made on parties against whom a default has been entered
RULE 2.516. SERVICE OF PLEADINGS AND DOCUMENTS (Fla. R. Jud. Admin.)
(a) Service; When Required. Unless the court otherwise orders, or a statute or supreme
court administrative order specifies a different means of service, every pleading
subsequent to the initial pleading and every other document filed in any court proceeding,
except applications for witness subpoenas and documents served by formal notice or
required to be served in the manner provided for service of formal notice, must be served
in accordance with this rule on each party. No service need be made on parties against
whom a default has been entered, except that pleadings asserting new or additional
claims against them must be served in the manner provided for service of summons.
NOTE: Affidavits of Diligent Search filed February 12, 2013 in state court show no information
found as to: 1) Defendant Elizabeth Bauerle; 2) Defendant Unknown Spouse of Elizabeth
Bauerle; and 3) Defendant Unknown Settlors/Beneficiaries of the Gillespie Family Trust.
2013, 02-11-13, Disclaimer of the United States
Certificate of Indebtedness (COI) with a ZERO balance
2013, 06-19-13, P's Motion for default ORHA and DECCA
2013, 06-19-13, P's Notice dropping UNKNOWN SPOUSE NJG
2013, 07-08-13, Notice of Defendants' Consent to Judgment
Filing # 22402581 E-Filed 01/09/2015 08:21:34 PM
Appendix of Exhibits - January 9, 2015

Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Neil J. Gillespie
Case No. 2013-CA-000115, Marion County, Fifth Judicial Circuit
Exhibit A
Email January 8, 2015 of Clerk's Counsel Mr. Harrell nonresident bond
Exhibit B
Return of Service Misjoined Co-Trustee Summons not complete
Exhibit C
Plaintiffs Civil Cover Sheet 13-115-CAT Not a Commercial Foreclosure
Exhibit D
2015 Residential Property Card CERTIFIED by Property Appraiser
Exhibit E
Marion Co. Property Appraiser Exemption Codes
Exhibit F
42 USC 12101 ADA Findings and Purpose
Exhibit G
42 USC 12102 ADA Definition of Disability
Exhibit H
42 USC 12202 ADA State Immunity
Exhibit I
Exhibit J
Exhibit K
Exhibit L
FDLE 2 Fruitland Park Police Officers in KKK Lake County
Exhibit M
Confederate currency on Marion Co. Clerk's website
Exhibit N
News Ocala Star-Banner, Johnny Reb, County Prepares to Move Nov-18-2009
Exhibit O
10 USC 333 Interference with State and Federal law
Exhibit P
DOJ deprivation of rights under color of law 18 USC 242
Page 1 of 1
Neil Gillespie
From:
"Greg Harrell" <GHarrell@marioncountyclerk.org>
To:
"Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
Sent:
Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Records request-Mr Harrell for the Clerk Jan-07-2015
Mr. Gillespie:
In response to your public records request of yesterday, please note as follows:
1-The court file contains no record of the plaintiff having filed a nonresident bond to date; and
2-A copy of the requested two-page Return of Service with attached Civil Action Summons can and will be provided you
upon your payment of the $2.00 copying costs. You may pay by credit/debit card by calling Mellissa Tucker at 352/6715614.
It is my belief that the Clerk was required by rule 1.070(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to issue the summonses
presented upon the commencement of the action once the required summons issuance fees were paid. Whether the
particular summons in question was defective and whether the clerk may have any liability for having issued it, along with
all of the other matters set forth in your letter to me of yesterday, are all matters that you will need to take up with the court.
Sincerely,
Greg Harrell
Gregory C. Harrell
General Counsel to David R. Ellspermann, Marion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller
P.O. Box 1030
Ocala, Florida 34478-1030
(352) 671-5603
gharrell@marioncountyclerk.org
>>> "Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net> 1/7/2015 6:24 PM >>>
A
1/9/2015
'-:.';~.
RE_,N OF SERVICE
..
State of Florida
County of Marion
Circuit Court
Case Number: 'f3-11 S:CA-T
Ill
Plaintiff:
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
vs.
12-02121-3
1~1
Defendant:
NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE
GILLESPIE FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10,
1997, ET AL
For:
MCCALLA RAYMER (FLORIDA)
225 E. ROBINSON STREET, STE.660
ORLANDO, FL 32801
Received by ROBERT W. MCGUINNESS on the 11th day of January, 2013 at 9:38am to be served on NEIL J GILLESPIE
AND MARK GILLESPIE AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE GILLESPIE FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT DATED
FEBRUARY 10, 1997,8092 SW 115TH LOOP, OCALA, FL 34481.
I, ROBERT W. MCGUINNESS, do hereby affirm that on the 12th day of January, 2013 at 1:55 pm, 1:
INDIVIDUALLY served by delivering a true copy of the SUMMONS, A NOTICE FROM THE COURT REGARDING
LAWSUITS TO FORECLOSE MORTGAGES ON HOMES, NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS, COMPLAINT AND EXHIBITS with
the date and hour of service endorsed thereon by me, to: NEIL J GILLESPIE at the address of: 8092 SW 115TH LOOP,
OCALA, FL 34481, and informed said person of the contents therein. Service was effected pursuant to F.S. 48.031 (1 )(A).
Military Status: Based upon inquiry of party served, Defendant is not in the military service of the United States of America.
Marital Status: Based upon inquiry of party served, Defendant is not married.
Additional Information pertaining to this Service:
SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT A MOBILE HOME. UPON INQUIRY, NEIL J. GILLESPIE STATED THAT THE PROPERTY IS
OWNER OCCUPIED AND THERE ARE NO OTHER TENANTS/OCCUPANTS OVER THE AGE OF 18.
Description of Person Served: Age: 68, Sex: M, Race/Skin Color: WHITE, Height: 5.7, Weight: 200, Hair. GRAY,
Glasses: N
I certify that I am over the age of 18, I am not a party to this action and have no interest in the process being served. I have
been properly certified as a process server by ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A2008-21. I complied with all provisions of this
order and F.S. 48.031(5) at the time of service. Under penalties of pe~ury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Return of
Service and that the facts stated in it are true to the best of my knowledge. F.S. 92.525
\D
...::r
..
_J
->
::t::
ROBERT W. MCGUINNESS
ID # 05-07-6
0.-
-u
Our Job Serial Number: BDI-2013000433

Ref: 12-02121-3
B
Copyright~
19922011 Database Services. Inc. Process
Serve~s
Toolbox V6.5n
1 1 1 1 ~1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 :)D
'
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL

CIRCUIT OF FLORID ..'\ IN AND FOR MARION
COUNTY
, .
GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION
CASENO. \~-t\~-~\
SECTION NO.
MIUTARY:YES
NO
REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,
MOBILE HOME:YES
NO-VIN#:
CONTJNUO;:::U::-S:-:MARRJ-:-::-:-:-:-A-=GE-:Y-E-S_-_--:._-i,-0_
Plaintiff,
vs.
NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE
AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE GILLESPIE
FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997, et al.,
Defendants.
________________________________
/
CIVILACTION SUMMONS
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to serve this summons and a copy of the complaint on defendant(s):
Neil J. Gillespie and Mark Gillespie as Co-Trustees of the Gillespie Family Living Trust Agreement dated
February 10, 1997
8092 SW !15TH LOOP
OCALA, FL 34481
A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to
file a written response to the attached complaint with the clerk of this court. A phone call will not protect you;
your written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you
want the court to hear your side of the case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and
your wages, money and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the court. There are
other legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may
call an attorney referral service or legal aid office (listed in the phone book)
If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the
court at II 0 NW I stAve, Ocala, FL 34475. You must also mail or take a carbon COP,Y or ot py ofY.OL\) # nS-vZ.../
5erve,;,h1J ~tt-\0
written response to the "plaintiff's attorney" listed below:
SomrlniUalsc _
c~od I'
Danielle N Parsons
Fia. Bar N~.:0029364
McCalla Raymer, LLC
225 E. Robinson St. Suite 660
Orlando, FL 32801
Phone: (407) 674-1850
Time~:
j 1 ]'~
,
'1/1!'Person Served:
..
.
Married: YIN Mahtary. Y I~
Age: _ _ Sex:_ Race:_ Ht._N
Wt:
Hair:_ Glasses: Y I
Job Serial#:
Emaii:MRService@mcc~:~JJaraymc:.com
DAIED~~q J~l3
oo O<lN!!! ~oiido ~
Date Setved:c Jl2J.)l
~meRMANN
BY~~,!~~
Form 1.997 CIVIL COVER SHEET
The civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other
papers as required by law. This form sh~lI~be.fi~d by the plaintiff or petitioner for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of
reporting judicial workload data pursuanit<Y Ftbrlda Statutes Section 25.075.
CASE STYLE
I.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA IN AND
FOR MARION COUNTY
Plaintiff
Case #
Judge:
l 3. - \ \ :- L.ea=
vs.
Defendant
II.
NEIL J. GILLESPIE AND MARK GILLESPIE AS CO-TRUSTEES

OF THE GILLESPIE FAMILY LIVING TRUST AGREEMENT
DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1997, et ale
.~ '~"
TYPE OF CASE
(If the case fits more than one type of case, select the most definitive category.) If the most
descriptive label is a subcategory (is indented under a broader category), place an "x" in both
the main category and subcategory boxes.
Condominium
Homestead residential foreclosure SO $50,000
Contracts and indebtedness
Homestead residential foreclosure $50,00 I -$249,999
Eminent domain
Homestead residential foreclosure S250,000 or more
Auto negligence
Nonhomestead residential foreclosu.re
Negligence - other
SO $50,000
Business governance
Nonhomestead residential foreclosure
Business torts
$50,001 - $249,999
EnvironmentallToxic tort
Nonhomestead residential foreclosure
Third party indemnification
$250,000 or more
,_.. f::-'
Other real property actions $0 -~~:s..O~?p'O
Construction defect
-
Premises liability residential
Malpractice - medical
X Real PropertylMortgage Foreclosure

Commercial foreclosure SO .. $50,000
.X_Commercial foreclosure 550,001 - $249,999
Commercial foreclosure 5250,000 or more
IJ
__"
...-..
:" ;: ~?;
r-~:;.~~
Z
.'
f~,?
~.
;,.
. I
..... " ..
.r
U1
Malpractice .. other professional

Other
AntitrustlTrade regulation
Business transactions
Constitutional challenge - statute or ordinance
Constitutional challenge .. proposed amendment .
Libel/Slander
Corporate trusts
Shareholder derivative action
960921
~~I'
=::
':- : ......
:'-~ ::
_,,'
Professional malpractice
Malpractice business
Other real property actions $25~09Q'or mor\~
Premises liability - c~mmercial

Products liability
~~::
Other real property actions 550;00:" $249~9
---
Nursing home negligence
r':
_~
Mass tort
Negligent security
.....
:.=
~ ~-'~ :'::'~
;....
-. (,-.)
( ....
12..02121-2
II.
TYPE OF CASE
(If the case fits more than one type of case, select the most definitive category.) If the most
descriptive label is a subcategory (is indented under 8 broader category), place an "x" in both
the main c~tegory and subcategory boxes.
.'0... . \
.
Condominium
III.
.~
Homestead residential foreclosure $0 $50,000
Discrimination - employment or other
Securities litigation
Insurance claims
Trade secrets
Intel1ectual property
Trust litigation
REMEDIES SOUGHT (check all that apply):

X monetary;
nonmonetary declaratory or injunctive relief;
punitive
IV.
NUMBER OF CAUSES OF ACTION: [

(specify)
IS THIS CASE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT?

yes
X no
VI.
HAS NOTICE OF ANY KNOWN RELATED CASES BEEN FILED?

X no
yes If "yes," list all related cases by name, case number, and court.
VII.
IS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED IN COMPLAINT?
yes
X no
d in this cover sheet is accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

la. Bar#
Signatu
Attorney or party
0029364
(Bar # if attorney)
Danielle N. Parsons
960921
12-02121-2
MepA Search Results
Page 1 of3
MarioiiCOUIiij.PiOj)eiijAppra.ise.
"ri,II'le ~(t:~ Sll,ith,~, (:"F4.~~
I,---S_e_le_ct_L_a_n9_u_a9_e_ _v_1
i\S,~4\
Powered by Go<gIe Translate
HOMESearchPrevious Parcel Next ParcelTRIM NotieeTRIM SupplementAddress Change FormSales Verification Form
GO TO
2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 PRC
2015
7013-007-001
Prime Key: 2703946
As of 12/31/2014
Property Information
Taxes 1 Assessments:
GILLESPIE FAMILY TRUST

GILLESPIE NEIL J TR
8092 SW 115TH LOOP
OCALA FL 34481-3567
M.S.T.U.
Map ID: 114
PC: 01
Millage: 9002
Acres: 0.1
IMAGES
Situs: 8092 SW 115TH LOOP OCALA, 34481
Values NOT Available

Ex Codes: 01 38 35
Year
2014
2013
2012
Land Just
$9,000
$8,500
$8,500
Building
$68,862
$65,486
$69,336
History of Assessed Values

Mise Value
Mkt/Just
Assessed Val
$977
$78,839
$75,851
$744
$74,730
$74,730
$839
$78,675
$78,675
Exemptions
$50,500
$50,230
$50,500
Taxable Val
$25,351
$24,500
$28,175
Property Transfer History
Book/Page
6065/1251
5949/0022
5308/0647
5057/1669
4611/1212
3244/0728
3249/0438
2336/1332
1954/1794
Date
07/14
09/09
09/09
06/08
10/06
09/02
02/97
02/97
08/93
Instrument
Code
05
71
74
05
08
71
74
78
7 PORTIONUND INT
QUIT CL
DTH CER
PROBATE
QUIT CL
CORRECTIVE
DTH CER
PROBATE
TRUSTHX
o
o
o
o
3 DEVELOPER SALE
07 WARRANTY
Price
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$75,100
CERllFIED: ATRUE COPY

V1LLIE M. SMITH, CFA ASA
PROPERTY APPRAISER
MA ION COUNn: FL
BV~(
Parent Parcel: 7000-000-100
Depth Zoning C Notes

120
PUD
BK G L 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7 PORTIONUND INT
SEC 36 TWP 16 RGE 20

PLAT BOOK 002 PAGE 106
OAK RUN WOODSIDE TRACT
BLK G LOT 1
Front
38
V/I
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
o
o
Property Description
Use
0100
Q/U
Land Data - Warning: Verify Zoning

Units
Type Rate Loe
1.00
LT
1.00
Shp
1.00
Phy
1.00
Class Value
Just Value
Neighborhood 8024 OAK RUN SUB-WOODSIDE 7013

Mkt: 9 70
Traverse
Building 1 of 1
http://220.64.61.193:81/DEFAULT.aspx?Key=2703946&YR=2015
D
12/31/2014
MepA Search Results
Page 2 of3
RESOl=U12UlRlU4111U33R30D5011614.R4
FGR02=R16D21116U21.14U12
FOP03=UIRIU4111D5RIO.
PT004=11015D17R15U5U12.
CERTIFIED: ATRUE COPY
VllllE M. SMITH. CFA ASA
33
PROPERlY APPRAISER
IONCOU~
11
FL
DEPUTY
'2 12
11
fQRO;t
15
1:8
Building Characteristics
Improvement
Effective Age
Condition
Quality Grade
Year Built 1993

Obsolescence: Functional 0.00 0/0
Obsolescence: Locational 0.00 0/0
Architecture 0 - STANDARD SFR
IF-SFR- 01 FAMILY RESID

2 - 05-09 YRS
0- 0
700 - GOOD
Base Perimeter 162
Inspected on 2/25/2008 by 179
Type ID Exterior Walls

RES
FGR
FOP
PTO
01
02
03
04
32
32
01
01
CONC BLK-STUCO
CONC BLK-STUCO
NO EXTERIOR
NO EXTERIOR
Section: 1
Roof Style 10 GABLE
Roof Cover 08 FBRGLASS SHNGL
Heat Meth
20 HEAT PUMP
1
Heat Meth 00
2
Foundation 6 MONOLITC SLAB
Y
AIC
Stories Year Built Finished Attic Bsmt Area Bsmt Finish

1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
N
N
N
N
1993
1993
1993
1993
o 0/0
o 0/0
o 0/0
o 0/0
o 0/0
o 0/0
o 0/0
o 0/0
Grd Fir
Total Fir Area
Area
1,326 SF
1,326
336 SF
336
54
54 SF
255 SF
255
2 Bit-In Kitchen
Floor Finish
Wall Finish
24 CARPET
16 DRYWALL-PAINT
Bedrooms
4FixBath
o Dishwasher
Y
Y
Heat Fuel 1
10 ELECTRIC
3FixBath
2 Garb Disposal
Heat Fuel 2
00
2FixBath
o Garbage Compactor
Fireplaces
XFixture
2 Intercom
Vacuum
N
N
Miscellaneous Improvements
12/31/2014
MepA Search Results
Type
159
159
120
PAV CONCRETE
PAV CONCRETE
FENCE MASONRY
Page 3 of3
Nbr Units Type

544.00 SF
92.00 SF
130.00 SF
Life
20
20
50
Year In
1993
1993
1993
Grade
3
3
3
Length
34.0
23.0
0.0
Width
16.0
4.0
0.0
Depr Value
ARDra iser Notes

MODEL-NANTUCKET
Planning and Building, County Permit Search
**
Permit Number
MA64923
Amount
$34,040
Permit Search
Issued Date
8/1/1993
**
Complete Date
8/1/1993
Description
= VILLA
SFR
o
D
o
o
o
Property Images
CERTIFIED: ATRUE COPY
VILLIE M. SMITH, CFA ASA

PROPERTY APPRAISER
COUNT't FL
IlIIU....-tt-AII
DEPUTY
12/31/2014
,.1'
.......
"..
_.11..
"'$?'
t'.
:.r.
m..
t,
"'1.
lilJ
n "oW li.':'.
b."
I l . . . . . nl1[11
.1
t."
"
.'.
lin
trln.
_.'111
1 ' ' ' .i
.Jtv; :.~ ;:>:J~.'J\;'.~,l ~ '~~~::;i.!'j,j~!$!i~~:;.
VILLIE M. SMITH, CFA, ASA
. ..: :-:":,
MARION COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER

P.O. Box 486
1;- ~~
~~
GILLESPIE FAMILY TRUST

GILLESPIE NEIL J TR
8092 SW 115TH LOOP
OCALA FL 34481-3567
3Cj.48 i 350792
I) Ii IIII1 j Ii JIj J11 ii' i J' Ij.1 \IfilII IJjI' JJJ11'1'1 i JIIIII1 1 JII f f f i
Z:P 34471
011011647591
http://216.255.243.131/EXCDHELP.html
EXEMPTION CODES
These are the current exemption codes used by the Property Appraiser's Office.
CODE
01
02
03
04
05
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
23
24
25
26
31
35
36
37
38
40
50
51
65
66
67
TYPE OF EXEMPTION
HOMESTEAD
WIDOW
DISABILITY - 5000 DISABILITY VET
DISABILITY - PARAPLEGIC TOTAL
PARTIAL EXEMPTION
WIDOWER
RELIGIOUS
SCHOOL
NON PROFIT
CEMETERY
COUNTY
MUNICIPALITY
STATE
FEDERAL
IMMUNE
MURPHY LANDS (foreclosed by State of Florida)
INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
HOSPITAL
VETERAN-TOTAL
COUNTY-LANDS AVAILABLE
CIVILIAN-TOTAL
TANGIBLE
DISABILITY - CIVILIAN
DISABILITY - BLIND
MULTIPLE HOMESTEAD
ADDITIONAL 25,000 (DOES NOT APPLY TO SCHOOL LEVY)
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
CONSERVATION - FULL
CONSERVATION - 50%
SENIOR EXEMPTION
COMBAT VETERANS
GRANNY FLATS
These are the current classification codes used by the Property Appraiser's Office.
CODE
07
08
N8
21
TYPE OF CLASSIFICATION
LIFE ESTATE
AGRICULTURAL
*NEW AGRICULTURAL
CONDOMINIUM/ASSOCIATION DECLARATION
You have reached the bottom of the Exemption Codes page.
42 USC 12101
NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscprint.html).
TITLE 42 - THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE

CHAPTER 126 - EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES
12101. Findings and purpose
(a) Findings
The Congress finds that
(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a persons right to fully participate in all
aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been precluded from
doing so because of discrimination; others who have a record of a disability or are regarded as
having a disability also have been subjected to discrimination;
(2) historically, society has tended to isolate and segregate individuals with disabilities, and,
despite some improvements, such forms of discrimination against individuals with disabilities
continue to be a serious and pervasive social problem;
(3) discrimination against individuals with disabilities persists in such critical areas as
employment, housing, public accommodations, education, transportation, communication,
recreation, institutionalization, health services, voting, and access to public services;
(4) unlike individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex,
national origin, religion, or age, individuals who have experienced discrimination on the basis of
disability have often had no legal recourse to redress such discrimination;
(5) individuals with disabilities continually encounter various forms of discrimination, including
outright intentional exclusion, the discriminatory effects of architectural, transportation, and
communication barriers, overprotective rules and policies, failure to make modifications to
existing facilities and practices, exclusionary qualification standards and criteria, segregation, and
relegation to lesser services, programs, activities, benefits, jobs, or other opportunities;
(6) census data, national polls, and other studies have documented that people with disabilities,
as a group, occupy an inferior status in our society, and are severely disadvantaged socially,
vocationally, economically, and educationally;
(7) the Nations proper goals regarding individuals with disabilities are to assure equality
of opportunity, full participation, independent living, and economic self-sufficiency for such
individuals; and
(8) the continuing existence of unfair and unnecessary discrimination and prejudice denies people
with disabilities the opportunity to compete on an equal basis and to pursue those opportunities
for which our free society is justifiably famous, and costs the United States billions of dollars in
unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity.
(b) Purpose
It is the purpose of this chapter
(1) to provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination
against individuals with disabilities;
(2) to provide clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination against
individuals with disabilities;
(3) to ensure that the Federal Government plays a central role in enforcing the standards
established in this chapter on behalf of individuals with disabilities; and
(4) to invoke the sweep of congressional authority, including the power to enforce the fourteenth
amendment and to regulate commerce, in order to address the major areas of discrimination faced
day-to-day by people with disabilities.
(Pub. L. 101336, 2, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 328; Pub. L. 110325, 3, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3554.)
-1-
42 USC 12101
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original this Act, meaning Pub. L. 101336, July 26, 1990, 104
Stat. 327, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short
Title note set out below and Tables.
Amendments
2008Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 110325, 3(1), amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as
follows: some 43,000,000 Americans have one or more physical or mental disabilities, and this number is increasing
as the population as a whole is growing older;.
Subsec. (a)(7) to (9). Pub. L. 110325, 3(2), (3), redesignated pars. (8) and (9) as (7) and (8), respectively, and
struck out former par. (7) which read as follows: individuals with disabilities are a discrete and insular minority who
have been faced with restrictions and limitations, subjected to a history of purposeful unequal treatment, and relegated
to a position of political powerlessness in our society, based on characteristics that are beyond the control of such
individuals and resulting from stereotypic assumptions not truly indicative of the individual ability of such individuals
to participate in, and contribute to, society;.
Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110325 effective Jan. 1, 2009, see section 8 of Pub. L. 110325, set out as a note under
section 705 of Title 29, Labor.
Short Title of 2008 Amendment

Pub. L. 110325, 1, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that: This Act [enacting sections 12103 and 12205a
of this title, amending this section, sections 12102, 12111 to 12114, 12201, and 12206 to 12213 of this title, section
705 and former section 706 of Title 29, Labor, and enacting provisions set out as notes under this section and section
705 of Title 29] may be cited as the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
Short Title
Section 1(a) of Pub. L. 101336 provided that: This Act [enacting this chapter and section 225 of Title 47, Telegraphs,
Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs, amending section 706 of Title 29, Labor, and sections 152, 221, and 611 of Title
47, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 12111, 12131, 12141, 12161, and 12181 of this title] may
be cited as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Findings and Purposes of Pub. L. 110325

Pub. L. 110325, 2, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553, provided that:
(a) Findings.Congress finds that
(1) in enacting the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) [42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.], Congress intended that
the Act provide a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals
with disabilities and provide broad coverage;
(2) in enacting the ADA, Congress recognized that physical and mental disabilities in no way diminish a persons right
to fully participate in all aspects of society, but that people with physical or mental disabilities are frequently precluded
from doing so because of prejudice, antiquated attitudes, or the failure to remove societal and institutional barriers;
(3) while Congress expected that the definition of disability under the ADA would be interpreted consistently with
how courts had applied the definition of a handicapped individual under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 [29 U.S.C.
701 et seq.], that expectation has not been fulfilled;
(4) the holdings of the Supreme Court in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) and its companion
cases have narrowed the broad scope of protection intended to be afforded by the ADA, thus eliminating protection
for many individuals whom Congress intended to protect;
(5) the holding of the Supreme Court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184
(2002) further narrowed the broad scope of protection intended to be afforded by the ADA;
(6) as a result of these Supreme Court cases, lower courts have incorrectly found in individual cases that people with
a range of substantially limiting impairments are not people with disabilities;
(7) in particular, the Supreme Court, in the case of Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534
U.S. 184 (2002), interpreted the term substantially limits to require a greater degree of limitation than was intended
by Congress; and
-2-
42 USC 12101
(8) Congress finds that the current Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ADA regulations defining the term
substantially limits as significantly restricted are inconsistent with congressional intent, by expressing too high a
standard.
(b) Purposes.The purposes of this Act [see Short Title of 2008 Amendment note above] are
(1) to carry out the ADAs objectives of providing a clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of
discrimination and clear, strong, consistent, enforceable standards addressing discrimination by reinstating a broad
scope of protection to be available under the ADA;
(2) to reject the requirement enunciated by the Supreme Court in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999)
and its companion cases that whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity is to be determined with
reference to the ameliorative effects of mitigating measures;
(3) to reject the Supreme Courts reasoning in Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) with regard to
coverage under the third prong of the definition of disability and to reinstate the reasoning of the Supreme Court in
School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 480 U.S. 273 (1987) which set forth a broad view of the third prong of the
definition of handicap under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973;
(4) to reject the standards enunciated by the Supreme Court in Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v.
Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002), that the terms substantially and major in the definition of disability under the ADA
need to be interpreted strictly to create a demanding standard for qualifying as disabled, and that to be substantially
limited in performing a major life activity under the ADA an individual must have an impairment that prevents or
severely restricts the individual from doing activities that are of central importance to most peoples daily lives;
(5) to convey congressional intent that the standard created by the Supreme Court in the case of Toyota Motor
Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184 (2002) for substantially limits, and applied by lower courts
in numerous decisions, has created an inappropriately high level of limitation necessary to obtain coverage under the
ADA, to convey that it is the intent of Congress that the primary object of attention in cases brought under the ADA
should be whether entities covered under the ADA have complied with their obligations, and to convey that the question
of whether an individuals impairment is a disability under the ADA should not demand extensive analysis; and
(6) to express Congress expectation that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will revise that portion
of its current regulations that defines the term substantially limits as significantly restricted to be consistent with
this Act, including the amendments made by this Act.
Study by General Accounting Office of Existing Disability-Related Employment

Incentives
Pub. L. 106170, title III, 303(a), Dec. 17, 1999, 113 Stat. 1903, provided that, as soon as practicable after Dec.
17, 1999, the Comptroller General was to undertake a study to assess existing tax credits and other disability-related
employment incentives under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and other Federal
laws, specifically addressing the extent to which such credits and other incentives would encourage employers to hire
and retain individuals with disabilities; and that, not later than 3 years after Dec. 17, 1999, the Comptroller General
was to transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a written report presenting the results of the study and
any appropriate recommendations for legislative or administrative changes.
-3-
42 USC 12102

12102. Definition of disability
As used in this chapter:

(1) Disability
The term disability means, with respect to an individual
(A) a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of
such individual;
(B) a record of such an impairment; or
(C) being regarded as having such an impairment (as described in paragraph (3)).
(2) Major life activities
(A) In general
For purposes of paragraph (1), major life activities include, but are not limited to, caring for oneself,
performing manual tasks, seeing, hearing, eating, sleeping, walking, standing, lifting, bending,
speaking, breathing, learning, reading, concentrating, thinking, communicating, and working.
(B) Major bodily functions
For purposes of paragraph (1), a major life activity also includes the operation of a major bodily
function, including but not limited to, functions of the immune system, normal cell growth,
digestive, bowel, bladder, neurological, brain, respiratory, circulatory, endocrine, and reproductive
functions.
(3) Regarded as having such an impairment
For purposes of paragraph (1)(C):
(A) An individual meets the requirement of being regarded as having such an impairment if the
individual establishes that he or she has been subjected to an action prohibited under this chapter
because of an actual or perceived physical or mental impairment whether or not the impairment
limits or is perceived to limit a major life activity.
(B) Paragraph (1)(C) shall not apply to impairments that are transitory and minor. A transitory
impairment is an impairment with an actual or expected duration of 6 months or less.
(4) Rules of construction regarding the definition of disability
The definition of disability in paragraph (1) shall be construed in accordance with the following:
(A) The definition of disability in this chapter shall be construed in favor of broad coverage of
individuals under this chapter, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this chapter.
(B) The term substantially limits shall be interpreted consistently with the findings and purposes
of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008.
(C) An impairment that substantially limits one major life activity need not limit other major life
activities in order to be considered a disability.
(D) An impairment that is episodic or in remission is a disability if it would substantially limit
a major life activity when active.
(E) (i) The determination of whether an impairment substantially limits a major life activity shall
be made without regard to the ameliorative effects of mitigating measures such as
(I) medication, medical supplies, equipment, or appliances, low-vision devices (which
do not include ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses), prosthetics including limbs and
devices, hearing aids and cochlear implants or other implantable hearing devices, mobility
devices, or oxygen therapy equipment and supplies;
(II) use of assistive technology;
-1-
42 USC 12102
(III) reasonable accommodations or auxiliary aids or services; or

(IV) learned behavioral or adaptive neurological modifications.
(ii) The ameliorative effects of the mitigating measures of ordinary eyeglasses or contact
lenses shall be considered in determining whether an impairment substantially limits a major
life activity.
(iii) As used in this subparagraph
(I) the term ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses means lenses that are intended to
fully correct visual acuity or eliminate refractive error; and
(II) the term low-vision devices means devices that magnify, enhance, or otherwise
augment a visual image.
(Pub. L. 101336, 3, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 329; Pub. L. 110325, 4(a), Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat.
3555.)
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original this Act, meaning Pub. L. 101336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327,
which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note
set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.
The ADA Amendments Act of 2008, referred to in par. (4)(B), is Pub. L. 110325, Sept. 25, 2008, 122 Stat. 3553.
Section 2 of the Act, relating to the findings and purposes of the Act, is set out as a note under section 12101 of this
title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 2008 Amendment note under section 12101
of this title and Tables.
Amendments
2008Pub. L. 110325 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of pars. (1) to (3) defining
for purposes of this chapter auxiliary aids and services, disability, and State.
Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110325 effective Jan. 1, 2009, see section 8 of Pub. L. 110325, set out as a note under
section 705 of Title 29, Labor.
-2-
42 USC 12202

SUBCHAPTER IV - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
12202. State immunity
A State shall not be immune under the eleventh amendment to the Constitution of the United States
from an action in 1 Federal or State court of competent jurisdiction for a violation of this chapter.
In any action against a State for a violation of the requirements of this chapter, remedies (including
remedies both at law and in equity) are available for such a violation to the same extent as such
remedies are available for such a violation in an action against any public or private entity other
than a State.
Footnotes
1 So in original. Probably should be in a.
(Pub. L. 101336, title V, 502, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 370.)
References in Text
This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original this Act, meaning Pub. L. 101336, July 26, 1990, 104 Stat. 327,
which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note
set out under section 12101 of this title and Tables.
-1-
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13382&LangID=E
Google +

GENEVA (30 May 2013) The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Gabriela Knaul, today urged world
governments to develop and sustain effective legal aid systems as an essential component of a fair and efficient justice system founded on the rule of
law.
Legal aid is both a right in itself and an essential precondition for the exercise and enjoyment of a number of human rights, including the rights to a fair
trial and to an effective remedy, said Ms. Knaul, presenting her latest report to the UN Human Rights Council. It represents an important safeguard that
contributes to ensuring the fairness and public trust in the administration of justice.
Legal aid should be as broad as possible, she said, stressing that its aim is to contribute to the elimination of obstacles and barriers that impair or
restrict access to justice by providing assistance to people otherwise unable to afford legal representation and access to the court system.
The human rights expert underlined that legal aid should not only include the right to free legal assistance in criminal proceedings, but also the provision
of effective legal assistance in any judicial or extrajudicial procedure aimed at determining rights and obligations.
States bear the primary responsibility to adopt all appropriate measures to fully realize the right to legal aid for any individual within its territory and
subject to its jurisdiction, the Special Rapporteur said. Beneficiaries of legal aid should include any person who comes into contact with the law and
does not have the means to pay for counsel.
The right to legal aid must be legally guaranteed in national legal systems at the highest possible level, possibly in the Constitution, Ms. Knaul
highlighted among the specific recommendations provided in her new report.
The independent expert also observed that it is up to the individual State to identify the model that can maximize access to free legal aid for all
individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction.
Regardless of the structure of the legal aid programme or its formal status, it is of paramount importance that legal aid schemes be autonomous,
independent, effective, sustainable and easily available in order to ensure that they serve the interests of those who need financial support to have
access to justice on an equal basis with others, she concluded.
Gabriela Knaul took up her functions as UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers on 1 August 2009. In that capacity, she acts
independently from any Government or organization. Ms. Knaul has a long-standing experience as a judge in Brazil and is an expert in criminal justice
and the administration of judicial systems.
Learn more, log on to: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Judiciary/Pages/IDPIndex.aspx
(*) Check the report: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G13/119/35/PDF/G1311935.pdf?OpenElement or http://ap.ohchr.org/documents
/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/23/43
The Special Rapporteur also presented country reports on:
El Salvador: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A_HRC_23_43_Add.1_ENG.PDF
Pakistan: http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/HRC/23/43/Add.2
The Maldives: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session23/A-HRC-23-43-Add3_en.pdf
Check the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/indjudiciary.htm
For additional information and media requests, please contact Amanda Flores (+41 22 917 9186 / aflores@ohchr.org) or write to
srindependence@ohchr.org.
For media inquiries related to other UN independent experts:
Xabier Celaya, UN Human Rights Media Unit (+ 41 22 917 9383 / xcelaya@ohchr.org)
UN Human Rights, follow us on social media:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/unitednationshumanrights
Twitter: http://twitter.com/UNrightswire
Google+ gplus.to/unitednationshumanrights
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/UNOHCHR
Storify: http://storify.com/UNrightswire
The world we want: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/MDG/Pages/MDGPost2015Agenda.aspx
http://www.baynews9.com/content/news/baynews9/news/article.html/content/news/articles/cfn/2014/7/14/fruitland_park_kkk_p.html
Login | What is News+?
Jan 1
NEWS
Seen On 9
1:01:05 PM
WEATHER
Hillsborough
Temp: 66
TRAFFIC
Pinellas
SPORTS
Polk
Pasco
ON THE TOWN
Manatee
COMMUNITY
Hernando
Citrus
POLITICS
State
BUSINESS
National
Health
LOTTO
Space
VIDEO
NEWS
Espaol
The New Year is starting with a warming trend. Watch Weather on the Nines for details.
FDLE: 2 Fruitland Park police officers in KKK
By Dave D'Marko, Lake County Reporter

Last Updated: Monday, July 14, 2014, 6:08 PM
FRUITLAND PARK -- Two officers with the Fruitland Park Police Department are off the job after an investigation
linked them to the Ku Klux Klan.
Learn more | BHTV for IOS

BHTV for Android | BHTV for Kindle Fire
PC/Laptop
KLYSTRON 9 RADAR
An investigation by the FBI named Deputy Chief David Borst and Cpl. George Hunnewell as members of the Klan.
Borst resigned, and Hunnewell was terminated Friday following a brief internal investigation, Fruitland Park Police
Chief Terry Isaacs said.
Hunnewell had been demoted from corporal in 2013 for five write-ups for conduct, attitude, performance and
timeless, Isaacs said.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement presented an investigative summary from an FBI source to Isaacs on
Wednesday, stating the officers were associated with a "subversive organization."
The investigation found no criminal wrongdoings.
"We are here, we are in place, and I want the public to know this type of conduct will not even be remotely
tolerated," Isaacs said.
Isaacs said he plans to interview every police officer within the department and ask them about potential ties to
subversive groups, which are against department policy.
Every case that Borst and Hunnewell worked will now be turned over for review by the State Attorney's Office,
Isaacs said.
LATEST NEWS: LAKE COUNTY
Page 1 of 1
Neil Gillespie
From:
"Greg Harrell" <GHarrell@marioncountyclerk.org>
To:
"Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net>
Sent:
Monday, January 05, 2015 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: Records request to Mr. Harrell, Art. I, Sec. 24, Florida Constitution
Mr. Gillespie:
Copies of the executed versions of both proclamations will be made available to you upon your payment of the $0.30 total
copying cost.
The confederate money, images of which are on the Clerk's website, was found in connection with our office's purging
of circuit civil court and probate court files that have met state retention requirements. The file(s) in which the money was
found did not attribute the money to any particular case, and we are not aware of any other confederate records currently
being displayed by the Clerk. Pursuant to Section 2-77 of the Marion County Code of Ordinances, the Clerk is a member of
the county historical commission. In that role, the Clerk has taken an interest in placing images of old historical photos and
the found currency on his website. It was his decision to do so. He did not need - and, thus, did not seek - any authorization
to do so.
Sincerely,
Greg Harrell
Gregory C. Harrell
General Counsel to David R. Ellspermann, Marion County Clerk of Court & Comptroller
P.O. Box 1030
(352) 671-5603
gharrell@marioncountyclerk.org
>>> "Neil Gillespie" <neilgillespie@mfi.net> 1/2/2015 9:44 AM >>>
1/9/2015
http://www.ocala.com/article/20091118/ARTICLES/911181013/1402/NEWS?template=printpicart
This copy is for your personal, noncommercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for
distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers here or use the "Reprints" tool that appears above
any article. Order a reprint of this article now.
County prepares to move Confederate

monument
County administrator to create list of possible sites for statue.
By Bill Thompson
Staff writer
Published: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 at 6:30 a.m.
The Confederate monument that stood guard in

front of the Marion County Courthouse for
nearly a century, only to be stuck in a corner
two years ago as the facility was expanded, is
likely moving.
The question remains: Where?
On Tuesday, the County Commission appeared
FILE
to reach a consensus to relocate the statue of

the Confederate infantryman, known commonly
The Confederate statue at the Marion

courthouse.
as "Johnny Reb."
That came after Ocala lawyer Lanny Curry proposed a public-private partnership to
relocate the 101-year-old monument and volunteered to help raise the estimated
$25,000 needed to move it from its present location, a nook on the building's south
side fronting Northwest First Street.
To further the project, commissioners agreed to set up an account with the court
clerk's office to accept tax-exempt donations and accepted Commissioner Charlie
Stone's offer to serve as a liaison to work with Curry and other parties interested in
finding Johnny Reb a new home.
County Administrator Lee Niblock said he would prepare at least three new
locations for the board to consider at its next meeting, scheduled for Dec. 1.
Niblock indicated that the Ocala-Marion County Veterans Memorial Park, a site
favored by many, is one option. Leaving the monument where it is will be offered as
another, he added. As for where else it might go, Niblock was mum, only saying the
spot would reflect the statue's "historical significance."
Johnny Reb was removed in 2007 from the front of the courthouse in downtown
Ocala in preparation for a $41-million expansion.
Other than spending a four-year stint in storage in the late 1980s when the
courthouse was last renovated, the two-story-tall, 15-ton statue has been a fixture at
the facility's entrance since being dedicated in April 1908.
The current courthouse project is expected to be completed in January.
Former county administrator Pat Howard had designated Johnny Reb's current
location as permanent and Niblock was inclined to concur unless the County
Commission directed otherwise. Curry, a U.S. Navy veteran and member of the Sons
of Confederate Veterans, appealed to the board to find a "suitable location" for the
monument.
http://www.ocala.com/article/20091118/ARTICLES/911181013/1402/NEWS?template=printpicart
Relating that his great-grandfather, Lawton Curry, was a Confederate soldier in the
Florida cavalry who had been wounded in battle, Curry said it was not "in a place of
honor and not in a proper location."
His preference is the veterans' park, at Fort King Street and Southeast 25th Avenue,
about two miles from where Johnny Reb is now situated.
Curry also said he was trying to fulfill a commitment to the late Tommy Needham, a
former county commissioner and impetus for the park.
"I promised him that I would not let the issue go away," Curry told the commission.
Curry said he felt strongly about the need to sustain the memory of the efforts of
those who fought in the Civil War.
While the monument has periodically ignited controversy as civil rights groups
complained it is an affront to blacks, the commission's reluctance to overrule
Howard's decision was primarily rooted in the cost of moving it.
Relocating the statue requires a specialized moving company that can dismantle its
three fitted parts and reassemble it.
Stone suggested the board could perhaps convince some company to offer in-kind
services to move it.
Once the cost issue is resolved, the monument should be placed in a more
prominent position, Stone offered.
"It's just not in a location where people can see it on an ongoing basis," he said.
In other action, the board learned that Marion County had received almost $2.5
million in federal stimulus funding to make the courthouse and some county offices
more energy efficient.
Roughly $727,000 of that amount will be used to install new cooling units to replace
the 50-year-old units at the courthouse's heating and air conditioning system. An
additional $303,000 will be spent to replace the facility's windows and lighting.
Another $450,000 will go for installing solar heating panels at the Marion County
Jail.
Other improvements include updating traffic signals, installing waterless urinals,
improving lighting and air conditioning at three county firehouses and replacing
windows.
"It's a huge accomplishment that will save the citizens a ton of money,"
Commissioner Stan McClain observed.
Congress passed President Barack Obama's $787-billion spending program in
February.
Copyright 2014 Ocala.com All rights reserved. Restricted use only.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2011-title10/html/USCODE-2011-title10-subtitleA-partI-chap15-sec333.htm
10 U.S.C.
United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 10 - ARMED FORCES
Subtitle A - General Military Law
PART I - ORGANIZATION AND GENERAL MILITARY POWERS
CHAPTER 15 - INSURRECTION
Sec. 333 - Interference with State and Federal law
From the U.S. Government Printing Office, www.gpo.gov
333. Interference with State and Federal law

The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take
such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence,
unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State,
that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named
in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail,
or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of
justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal
protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15; Pub. L. 109364, div. A, title X, 1076(a)(1), Oct. 17, 2006,
120 Stat. 2404; Pub. L. 110181, div. A, title X, 1068(a)(1), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 325.)
Revised section
333
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES

Source (U.S. Code)
Source (Statutes at Large)
50:203.
R.S. 5299.
The words armed forces are substituted for the words land or naval forces of the United States. The
word shall is substituted for the words it shall be lawful for * * * and it shall be his duty.
DERIVATION
Act Apr. 20, 1871, ch. 22, 3, 17 Stat. 14.
AMENDMENTS
2008Pub. L. 110181 amended section generally, substituting provisions directing the President to
suppress certain insurrections and domestic violence in a State for provisions authorizing the President to
employ the armed forces during a natural disaster or terrorist attack or to suppress an insurrection in a State
and requiring notice to Congress during the exercise of such authority.
2006Pub. L. 109364 amended section catchline and text generally, substituting provisions authorizing the
President to employ the armed forces during a natural disaster or terrorist attack or to suppress an insurrection
in a State and requiring notice to Congress during the exercise of such authority for provisions directing the
President to suppress certain insurrections and domestic violence in a State.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 2008 AMENDMENT
Pub. L. 110181, div. A, title X, 1068(d), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 326, provided that: The amendments
made by this section [amending this section and sections 334 and 12304 of this title and repealing section 2567
of this title] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Jan. 28, 2008].
http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/crm/242fin.php
Home Agencies Civil Rights Division About Criminal
Civil Rights Division

Home
About the Division
Appellate
Criminal
Human Trafficking
Prosecution Unit
Statutes
DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF

LAW
Summary:
Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color
of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected
by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
Housing and Civil

Enforcement
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts
not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful
authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful
authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or
pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons
acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include
police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as
well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who
are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be
motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap,
familial status or national origin of the victim.
Office of Special Counsel

for Immigration-Related
Unfair Employment
Practices
The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term,

or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime,
and the resulting injury, if any.
Cases
Disability Rights
Education
Employment
Federal Coordination and
Compliance
Policy and Strategy
Working Groups
How to File a Complaint

Press Room
Cases and Matters
Publications
Employment
Opportunities
Civil Rights FOIA
Contact the Division
(202) 514-3204
FAX - (202) 514-8336
TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242
Special Litigation
Voting
Robert Moossy
Chief
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance,

regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any
State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to
the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from
the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts
include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a
dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under
this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and
if death results from the acts committed in violation of this
section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined
under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for
life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Report a Violation
Get a Job
Contact Us
Return to the Criminal Section Home Page
P
ABOUT
The Attorney General
Budget & Performance
Strategic Plans
AGENCIES
BUSINESS & GRANTS
Business Opportunities
Small & Disadvantaged
Business
Grants
RESOURCES
Forms
CAREERS
Legal Careers
Publications
Case Highlights
Legislative Histories
Interns, Recent Graduates,

and Fellows
Diversity Policy
Information for Victims

Large Cases
Veteran Recruitment
CONTACT
NEWS
Justice News
The Justice Blog
Videos
Photo Gallery
Site Map
Archive
Accessibility
FOIA
No FEAR Act
Information Quality
Privacy Policy
Legal Policies &
Disclaimers
For Employees
Office of the Inspector
General
Government
Resources
Plain Writing
USA.gov
BusinessUSA
2014 #
FOREIGN
PROFIT
CORPORATION
ANNUAL
REPORT
Filing
22402581
E-Filed
01/09/2015
08:21:34
PM
FILED
Feb 25, 2014
Secretary of State
CC3800971147
DOCUMENT# F07000001520
Entity Name: REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Current Principal Place of Business:
2727 SPRING CREEK DRIVE
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Current Mailing Address:

SPRING, TX 77373-6130 US
FEI Number: 77-0672274
Certificate of Status Desired: No
Name and Address of Current Registered Agent:

REGISTERED AGENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
155 OFFICE PLAZA DRIVE
SUITE A
TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 US
The above named entity submits this statement for the purpose of changing its registered office or registered agent, or both, in the State of Florida.
SIGNATURE:
Date
Electronic Signature of Registered Agent
Officer/Director Detail :
Title
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
Title
Name
GHERARDI, KEVIN
Name
KENT, MICHAEL
Address
502 PHEASANT LANE
Address
204 CARLESTER DRIVE
City-State-Zip:
JUPITER FL 33458-8367
City-State-Zip:
LOS GATOS CA 95032
Title
Title
Name
PAYLOR, CHARLES A.
Name
WRIGHT, JAMES
Address
Address
2541 ABBOTT OAKS DR
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373
City-State-Zip:
KERNERSVILLE NC 27284-4146
Title
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
Title
Name
JETT, DONNA
Name
JOHNSON, ELEANOR
Address
Address
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373
Title
Title
Name
HELM, THOMAS
Name
ROSYNEK, RALPH
Address
Address
14009 FRANCIS OUIMET CIRCLE
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373
City-State-Zip:
MIDLOTHIAN IL 60445
Continues on page 2
I hereby certify that the information indicated on this report or supplemental report is true and accurate and that my electronic signature shall have the same legal effect as if made under
oath; that I am an officer or director of the corporation or the receiver or trustee empowered to execute this report as required by Chapter 607, Florida Statutes; and that my name appears
above, or on an attachment with all other like empowered.
SIGNATURE: JOE WAKEM

Electronic Signature of Signing Officer/Director Detail
Officer/Director Detail Continued :
VICE PRESIDENT
02/25/2014
Date
Title
VP
Title
VP
Name
MUSICK, SUZANNE
Name
MORAN, DEBRA
Address
Address
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373-6130
Title
VP
Title
VP
Name
SIMMS, DEBBIE
Name
HEBERT, MARY
Address
Address
City-State-Zip:
City-State-Zip:
Title
VP
Title
VP
Name
JOHNSON, ROBBYE
Name
DAVIS, KAYCE
Address
Address
City-State-Zip:
City-State-Zip:
Title
PRESIDENT
Title
SECRETARY
Name
CLARKE, D. S.
Name
COREY, BRIAN F
Address
20321 93RD PLACE
Address
1729 OAKLAND ROAD
City-State-Zip:
MINNETONKA MN 55305-1724
Title
Name
FRYE, KEN
Address
11034 EAST VERBANA LANE
City-State-Zip:
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255-9060
Title
Name
LARSEN, TORREY
Address
3347 GREYSTONE DRIVE
City-State-Zip:
JAMUL CA 91935-1541
Title
Name
TRASK, WILLIAM
Address
3131 CAMINO DEL RIO N
City-State-Zip:
SAN DIEGO CA 92108-5701
Title
Name
WILLIAMS, CATHY
Address
3711 MORGAN LANE
City-State-Zip:
MANVEL TX 77578-3553
Title
Name
GAGLIONE, ANTHONY
Address
4415 CAMINITO CRISTALINO
City-State-Zip:
Title
VP
Name
BROWN, JEANETTA M.
Address
3000 BAYPORT DRIVE

1100
City-State-Zip:
SCOTTSDALE AZ 85255-6618
Title
TREASURER
Name
COLLINS, CHERYL A.
Address
15247 WILDS PARKWAY
City-State-Zip:
PRIOR LAKE MN 55372-3226
Title
Name
FLYNNE, LESLIE
Address
City-State-Zip:
SPRING TX 77373
Title
Name
LARSEN, TYLER
Address
105 N. PARK DRIVE
City-State-Zip:
EL CAJON CA 92021-4045
Title
Name
SASS, KURT
Address
8917 SPRINGWOOD DRIVE
City-State-Zip:
WOODBURY MN 55125-4903
Title
Name
JOHNSON, RISCHARD J.
Address
1111 BARBERRY COURT
City-State-Zip:
DOWNERS GROVE IL 60515-1413
Title
Name
ENTRINKIN, DAVID
Address
2121 JARAMA COURT
City-State-Zip:
EL CAJON CA 92019-4146
City-State-Zip:
TAMPA FL 33607-8405
Title
VP
Title
VP
Name
PHILLIPS, BRENDA
Name
DOKOS, ANDREW
Address
Address
506 BRUCE WAY SW
City-State-Zip:
City-State-Zip:
LILBURN GA 30047-3028
Title
VP
Title
Name
VP
Name
WAKEM, JOE
FOSSLER, MIKE
Address
Address
7592 TOPAZ LAKE AVENUE
City-State-Zip:
City-State-Zip:
Title
CHAIRMAN
Name
ANDERSON, KEITH A,
Address
City-State-Zip:
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail/EntityName/forp-f07000001520-56824af6-00eb-45b2-9192-98d829ed7c72/Re...
Home
Contact Us
E-Filing Services
Document Searches
Foreign Profit Corporation

Filing Information
Document Number
FEI/EIN Number
Date Filed
State
Status
F07000001520
770672274
03/19/2007
DE
ACTIVE
Principal Address
2727 Spring Creek Drive
Spring, TX 77373-6130
Changed: 02/25/2014
Mailing Address
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Changed: 01/27/2010
Registered Agent Name & Address
REGISTERED AGENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
155 OFFICE PLAZA DRIVE
SUITE A
TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301
Officer/Director Detail
Name & Address
Title Executive Vice President
Gherardi, Kevin
502 Pheasant Lane
Jupiter, FL 33458-8367
Kent, Michael
Copyright and Privacy Policies

State of Florida, Department of State
Forms
Help
Los Gatos, CA 95032

Paylor, Charles A.
Spring, TX 77373
Wright, James
2541 Abbott Oaks Dr
Kernersville, NC 27284-4146
Title Senior Vice President
Jett, Donna
Spring, TX 77373
Johnson, Eleanor
Spring, TX 77373
Helm, Thomas
Spring, TX 77373
Rosynek, Ralph
14009 Francis Ouimet Circle
Midlothian, IL 60445
Title VP
Musick, Suzanne
Spring, TX 77373
Title VP
Moran, Debra
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Title VP
Simms, Debbie
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Title VP
Hebert, Mary
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Title VP
Johnson, Robbye
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Title VP
Davis, Kayce
SPRING, TX 77373-6130
Title President
Clarke, D. S.
20321 93rd Place
Scottsdale, AZ 85255-6618
Title Secretary
Corey, Brian F
1729 Oakland Road
Minnetonka, MN 55305-1724
Title Treasurer
Collins, Cheryl A.
15247 Wilds Parkway
Prior Lake, MN 55372-3226
Frye, Ken
11034 East Verbana Lane
Scottsdale, AZ 85255-9060
Flynne, Leslie
Spring, TX 77373
Larsen, Torrey
3347 Greystone Drive
Jamul, CA 91935-1541
Larsen, Tyler
105 N. Park Drive
El Cajon, CA 92021-4045
Trask, William
3131 Camino Del Rio N
San Diego, CA 92108-5701
Sass, Kurt
8917 Springwood Drive
Woodbury, MN 55125-4903
Williams, Cathy
3711 Morgan Lane
Manvel, TX 77578-3553
Johnson, Rischard J.
1111 Barberry Court
Downers Grove, IL 60515-1413
Gaglione, Anthony
4415 Caminito Cristalino
Entrinkin, David
2121 Jarama Court
El Cajon, CA 92019-4146
Title VP
Brown, Jeanetta M.
3000 Bayport Drive
1100
Tampa, FL 33607-8405
Title VP
Phillips, Brenda
506 Bruce Way SW

Lilburn, GA 30047-3028
Title VP
Dokos, Andrew
Spring, TX 77373-6130
Title VP
Fossler, Mike
7592 Topaz Lake Avenue
Title VP
Wakem, Joe
Spring, TX 77373-6130
Title Chairman
Anderson, Keith A
Spring, TX 77373-6130
Annual Reports
Report Year
2012
2013
2014
Filed Date
01/05/2012
04/12/2013
02/25/2014
Document Images
02/25/2014 -- ANNUAL REPORT
View image in PDF format
03/19/2007 -- Foreign Profit

Notice 10 U.S.C. 333 Interference With State and Federal Law

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Notice 10 U.S.C. 333 Interference With State and Federal Law

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Filing # 22402581 E-Filed 01/09/2015 08:21:34 PM

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

The Plaintiff is a nonresident corporation of the State of Delaware, according to records

of the Florida Division of Corporations that accompany this pleading.

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

move to dismiss this action as provided by 57.011, Fla. Stat.

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

service of process for Mark Gillespie Co-Trustee, service of process on Defendants,

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

If necessary, a hearing must be held to determine that my home is a residential property,

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Therefore any foreclosure of my residential homestead property must be designated a

I am a disabled consumer of legal and court services affecting interstate commerce. I

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

The Supremacy Clause

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a persons right to fully

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

The Marion County Board of County Commissioners issued a Proclamation of

Images of Confederate currency are displayed on the government website of David R.

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, 18 U.S.C. 242: (Exhibit P)

Neil J. Gillespie, individually and as trustee

Appendix of Exhibits - January 9, 2015

Email January 8, 2015 of Clerk's Counsel Mr. Harrell nonresident bond

Return of Service Misjoined Co-Trustee Summons not complete

Plaintiffs Civil Cover Sheet 13-115-CAT Not a Commercial Foreclosure

2015 Residential Property Card CERTIFIED by Property Appraiser

Marion Co. Property Appraiser Exemption Codes

42 USC 12101 ADA Findings and Purpose

42 USC 12102 ADA Definition of Disability

42 USC 12202 ADA State Immunity

Legal aid, a right in itself UN Special Rapporteur

2013 Marion Co. Proclamation-Confederate History Month

2014 Marion Co. Proclamation-Confederate History Month

FDLE 2 Fruitland Park Police Officers in KKK Lake County

Confederate currency on Marion Co. Clerk's website

News Ocala Star-Banner, Johnny Reb, County Prepares to Move Nov-18-2009

10 USC 333 Interference with State and Federal law

DOJ deprivation of rights under color of law 18 USC 242

DOJ Criminal, Contact local FBI field office

The Honorable John Anthony Tomasino

Mr. Tad David, General Counsel

The Honorable John F Harkness

The Honorable Michael L. Schneider

The Honorable Don F. Briggs

The Honorable Hale R. Stancil

Ms. Grace A. Fagan, General Counsel

Ms. Tameka Gordon, ADA Coordinator

The Honorable David R. Ellspermann

Mr. Gregory C. Harrell, General Counsel for

Mr. Curtis Wilson, Esq.

Ms. Colleen Murphy Davis, AUSA

Oak Run Homeowners Association, Inc.

U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights

Development & Construction Corporation of America,

Defendants Notice to Plaintiff F.S. 57.011 Nonresident Bond

Unknown spouse of Mark Gillespie n/k/a Joetta Gillespie