Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 10 March 2010
Received in revised form
19 August 2010
Accepted 31 August 2010
Available online 20 November 2010
In this work, we address the problem of transforming seismic reection data into an intrinsic rock
property model. Specically, we present an application of a methodology that allows interpreters to
obtain effective porosity 3D maps from post-stack 3D seismic amplitude data, using measured density
and sonic well log data as constraints. In this methodology, a 3D acoustic impedance model is calculated
from seismic reection amplitudes by applying an L1-norm sparse-spike inversion algorithm in the time
domain, followed by a recursive inversion performed in the frequency domain. A 3D low-frequency
impedance model is estimated by kriging interpolation of impedance values calculated from well log data.
This low-frequency model is added to the inversion result which otherwise provides only a relative
numerical scale. To convert acoustic impedance into a single reservoir property, a feed-forward Neural
Network (NN) is trained, validated and tested using gamma-ray and acoustic impedance values observed
at the well log positions as input and effective porosity values as target. The trained NN is then applied for
the whole reservoir volume in order to obtain a 3D effective porosity model. While the particular
conclusions drawn from the results obtained in this work cannot be generalized, such results suggest that
this workow can be applied successfully as an aid in reservoir characterization, especially when there is a
strong non-linear relationship between effective porosity and acoustic impedance.
& 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Reservoir characterization
Seismic inversion
Feed-forward neural network
Matlab
1. Introduction
During the last decades, several methods for mapping acoustic
impedance from post-stack seismic amplitude data were developed and tested with the aim of providing additional information
for detailed reservoir characterization. Nowadays, most of the
research efforts in this eld are focused in the inversion and
interpretation of variations of seismic reection amplitude with
change in distance between source and receiver (amplitude vs.
offset) from pre-stack data. However, post-stack data obtained
from recorded P-waves are still widely used because of their ready
availability and low time-consuming processing. Because wells in a
reservoir eld are often spaced at hundreds or even thousands of
meters, the ultimate goal of a seismic inversion procedure in the
context of reservoir characterization is to provide models not only
of acoustic impedance but also of other relevant physical properties, such as effective porosity and water saturation, for the interwell regions. Such quantitative interpretations may sometimes
require the use of other seismic attributes additionally to the
traditional seismic reection amplitudes (Rijks and Jauffred, 1991;
Lefeuvre et al., 1995; Russell, 2004; Sancevero et al., 2005;
Soubotcheva, 2006).
0098-3004/$ - see front matter & 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2010.08.001
more recently, Neural Network (NN) methods. The main advantages of NN methods over most traditional statistical methods can
be summarized as follows: (i) the ability to extract nonlinear
relationships between the input data and the target values; (ii) less
sensitivity to the presence of noise in the data; and (iii) there is no
need to known the underlying statistical distribution of the input
data. NN methods have been successfully applied in a wide variety
of applications in reservoir characterization such as porosity and
permeability prediction from seismic and well-log data or seismic
facies/attributes classication (Leiphart and Hart, 2001; Hampson
et al., 2001; Walls et al., 2002; Pramanik et al., 2004; Calderon,
2007). In general, these papers compare performances of NN
models with traditional regression methods, demonstrating that
the former can provide higher correlation coefcient between
actual and predicted reservoir property values and minimize the
problem of sparse well coverage.
2. Methodology
2.1. Seismic inversion
The basic premises behind all seismic inversion methods in the
context of this work are as follows: (i) the Earth can be represented
locally by a stack of plane and parallel layers with constant physical
properties; (ii) the seismic trace s(t) can be represented by the
convolution of the reectivity coefcient series r(t) with a bandlimited wavelet w(t) and the addition of a random noise n(t):
st rtwt nt:
IAj 1 IAj
,
IAj 1 IAj
M
X
rj :
1175
M
X
j1
jrj j
1 1
2
: sWr:
2 s
j2
1176
1177
Fig. 3. Example of seismic-well tie for Well 2: (a) impedance log converted to two-way time and resampled to interval of 4 ms; (b) reectivity obtained after deterministic
wavelet extraction; (c) synthetic traces computed through convolution of reectivity with wavelet and (d) observed traces.
Fig. 4. Normalized amplitude spectrum of (a) reectivity, (b) wavelet, (c) synthetic traces and (d) observed traces near Well 2.
1178
low and high cut-offs were dened, after some tests, as 5 and 60 Hz,
respectively.
The reservoir top and base were estimated from well log
markers allowing the denition of minimum and maximum time
values, thus establishing the vertical boundaries of the seismic 3D
grid shown in the subsequent gures. The lateral boundaries were
dened so as to embrace wells that were previously found to have
some oil or gas content in the eld. Fig. 5 shows the AI lowfrequency model obtained by kriging the AI well logs at the wells
depicted in Fig. 1.
Fig. 7. Correlation coefcient between observed seismic traces and synthetic traces
obtained from inverted models around Well 2.
Fig. 6. AI log prole (red curves) vs. inverted AI proles (blue curves) for Well 2 as a varies from 0.02 to 0.035. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend,
the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
1179
smooth, it lacks too much vertical detail and it gives a low R. A value
of a 0.025 was considered to be adequate because the inverted
curve follows the main trends that appear in the log prole while
R is sufciently large. When a is smaller than 0.025, overtting
seems to occur. The behavior of the inverted curve does not change
signicantly outside of the range 0.02 r a r0.035.
The 3D AI inverted model is shown in Fig. 8. A synthetic seismic
model calculated from this inverted model is highly correlated with
the observed seismic data (average R is equal to 0.92). While the
range of AI values is about the same, the inverted model is enriched
in details and can be used for posterior prediction of the reservoir
properties.
In this work we have found that a feed-forward NN can
successfully predict Phie from the joint use of GR and AI logs.
A sample set consisting of 32 log values was extracted from the well
logs for training (60%), validation (20%) and test (20%) of the NN.
The small amount of log values is due to the depth-to-time
conversion, which unavoidably reduces the vertical resolution of
the original well log data. The training must be performed in the
time scale instead of the depth scale to allow posterior prediction in
the entire seismic volume using the inverted AI model as input,
which in turn can only be obtained in the time scale.
In spite of this, the NN models were able to map the test samples
into Phie within an acceptable level of accuracy (R0.84). This was
checked by an iterative cross-validation scheme where the samples
that compose the three subsets were randomly interchanged and a
new NN model was obtained at each iteration. The graphs in Fig. 9
show the results for the NN model that provided the highest overall
Fig. 9. NN training, validation and test. R is correlation coefcient between outputs and actual target Phie values. All values were normalized into range [ 1,1].
1180
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge Petrobras Petroleo Brasileiro SA for the nancial support of this research and for the
development of the project in reservoir characterization.
References
Fig. 10. Phie model obtained by ordinary kriging of Phie well logs. Color bar is in
percentage. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure legend, the
reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 11. Phie model obtained from a designed NN. Color bar is in percentage.
Compared to ordinary kriging, this model shows higher spatial heterogeneity, thus
unraveling reservoir details. (For interpretation of the references to color in this
gure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
4. Conclusions
We have presented a two-fold methodology to predict effective
porosity from 3D seismic amplitude data. Seismic amplitude is
rstly converted into acoustic impedance through a constrained
sparse-spike inversion and then this inverted model, together with
a gamma-ray interpolated model, is used to design a Neural
Network capable of predicting effective porosity. For this reservoir
case, the overall correlation coefcient between the Neural Network outputs and the known effective porosity values was equal to
0.84, which is considered high for this kind of application. This also
means that the mist between inverted acoustic impedance and
well log acoustic impedance falls within a tolerable interval.
This methodology can also be used for a quick evaluation of
other reservoir properties such as water saturation, especially
when powerful commercial programs are not available. However, it
is important to notice that while lateral variability can be adequately captured by the inverted model, it tends to be relatively
Bjorck,
A., 1996. Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems, 1st ed. SIAM,
Philadelphia, PA 408pp.
Broadhead, M.K., 2008. The impact of random noise on seismic wavelet estimation.
The Leading Edge 27 (2), 226230.
Calderon, J.E., 2007. Porosity and lithologic estimation using rock physics and multiattribute transforms in Balcon Field, Colombia. Leading Edge 26 (2), 142150.
Demuth, H., Beale, M., Hagan, M., 2008. Neural Network ToolboxTM 6. Users Guide.
The MathWorksTM, Natick, MA 907pp.
Ferguson, R.J., Margrave, G.F., 1996, A simple algorithm for band-limited impedance
inversion: the CREWES research report, vol. 8, pp. 19.
Hampson, D., Russell, B., 1985. Maximum-likelihood seismic inversion. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual National Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists
(CSEG) Meeting. Abstract no. SP-16. Calgary, Alberta.
Hampson, B., Schuelke, J., Quirein, J., 2001. Use of multi-attribute transforms to
predict log properties from seismic data. Geophysics 66 (1), 346.
Lavergne, M., Willm, C., 1977. Inversion of seismograms and pseudo-velocity logs.
Geophysical Prospecting 25, 232250.
Lefeuvre, F.E., Wrolstad, K.H., Zou, K.S., Smith, L.J., Maret, J.-P., Nyein, U.K., 1995.
Sandshale ratio and sandy reservoir properties estimation from seismic
attributes: an integrated study. SEG Expanded Abstracts 95, 108110.
Leiphart, D.J., Hart, B.S., 2001. Comparison of linear regression and a probabilistic neural
network to predict porosity from 3-D seismic attributes in Lower Brushy Canyon
channeled sandstones, southeast New Mexico. Geophysics 66, 13491358.
Leite, E.P., Souza Filho, C.R., 2009. TEXTNNa MATLAB program for textural
classication using neural networks. Computers & Geosciences 35 (10),
20842094.
Lindseth, R.O., 1979. Synthetic sonic logs: a process for stratigraphic interpretation.
Geophysics 44, 326.
Loubes, M.J., De Geer, S.V., 2002. Adaptive estimation with soft thresholding
penalties. Statistica Neerlandica 56 (4), 453478.
Oldenburg, D.W., Scheuer, T., Levy, S., 1983. Recovery of the acoustic impedance
from reection seismograms. Geophysics 48 (10), 13181337.
Pramanik, A.G., Singh, V., Vig, R., Srivastava, K., Tiwary, D.N., 2004. Estimation of
effective porosity using geostatistics and multi-attribute transforms: a case
study. Geophysics 69, 352372.
Rijks, E.J.H., Jauffred, J.C.E.M., 1991. Attribute extraction: an important application in
any detailed 3-D interpretation study. Leading Edge 10 (9), 1119.
Robinson, G., 2001. Stochastic seismic inversion applied to reservoir characterization. CSEG Recorder 26 (1), 3840.
Russell, B.H., 1988. Introduction to Seismic Inversion Methods. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK 86pp.
Russell, B.H., 2004. The application of multivariate statistics and neural networks to
the prediction of reservoir parameters using seismic attributes. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Calgary, Alberta. 392pp.
Sacchi, M.D., Ulrych, T.J., 1996. Bayesian regularization of some seismic operators.
In: Hanson, K.M., Silver, R.N. (Eds.), Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Sancevero, S.S., Remacre, A.Z., Portugal, R.S., Mundim, E.C., 2005. Comparing
deterministic and stochastic seismic inversion for thin-bed reservoir characterization in a turbidite synthetic reference model of Campos Basin, Brazil. Leading
Edge 24 (11), 10941179.
Shewchuk, J.R., 1994. An introduction to the conjugate gradient method without the
agonizing pain. School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University,
Pittsburgh, PA. Report available at /http://www.cs.cmu.edu/ quake-papers/
painless-conjugate-gradient.pdfS.
Soubotcheva, N., 2006. Reservoir Property Prediction from Well-logs, VSP and
Multicomponent Seismic Data: Pikes Peak Heavy Oileld. Saskatchewan. M.Sc.
Thesis. Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Calgary, Alberta,
94 pp.
Walls, J.D., Taner, M.T., Taylor, G., Smith, M., Carr, M., Derzhi, N., Drummond, J.,
McGuire, D., Morris, S., Bregar, J., Lakings, J., 2002. Seismic reservoir characterization of a U.S. midcontinent uvial system using rock physics, poststack
seismic attributes, and neural networks. The Leading Edge 21, 428436.