Agenda 5: Raymond Williams Base and Superstructure and Walter
Benjamins Iron Construction What is fundamentally lacking . . . is any adequate recognition of the indissoluble connections between material production, political and cultural institutions and activity and consciousness. (Williams 80) Williams points out the flawed relationship between base and superstructure that traditional Marxists have perpetuated by restricting them as reified categories with a unilateral relationship. In traditional discourse the base economic condition affects the superstructure the institutions and practical consciousness of men but remains temporally and spatially distant and unaffected from it. Williams asserts the mutuality and the indissoluble connection of these categories. The economic conditions are dynamically affected by existing ideological forms and vice versa. Neither the base nor the superstructure is a static category and are constituted by various social and historical processes that need to be analyzed.
Walter Benjamins Iron Construction and Williams idea of Base and
Superstructure Williams concept of a mutual and symbiotic relationship between the base and the superstructure is exemplified in Walter Benjamins epigraph to the Iron Construction, which quotes, Each epoch dreams the one to follow (151). The changes that take place in the economic base are the result of the conflicts in the existing superstructure. These changes, in their wake, change the superstructure to suit them, and so the process continues. Benjamins analysis reflects this mutual relationship between the base and the superstructure and his methodology follows the technique that Williams is trying to suggest studying the real social and historical processes constituting these changes. Benjamin demonstrates these constitutive processes in his example of Iron Construction in the 19th century. The revolutionary use of iron in construction changed the form of the buildings and the associations drawn from their traditional structure in the practical consciousness of men. Benjamin refers to these structures as masks of architecture (151). In the feudal system of economy the baroque architecture was popular because it sufficed the material (agricultural) production of the age. It therefore got reified, in the practical consciousness of men, as the natural and obvious, though not perfect, medium for construction. Stone had some fundamental architectural laxity inflexible and comparatively low tensile strength than iron and therefore a stronger and more flexible material alternative was felt necessary. Such a material was iron(150). With the emergence of industrial capitalist base and the explosion in material production this dream was manifested in factories, warehouses, and arcades made from iron and glass, where it could be
produced, stored and demonstrated. Though the superstructure (architecture being
one of the institutions of superstructure) adapted to be useful to the capitalist base, it was not a product of the base but other social, historical and scientific processes. Works Cited Benjamin, Walter, Iron Construction. The Arcades Project. Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 2002. Print. Williams, Raymond. Base and Superstructure. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: OUP, 2010. Print.