Professional Documents
Culture Documents
All or most of the above are used in some way by the leaders of this
planet to discipline the people, which in itself is not a bad thing, it
does help to keep the masses in check, “nobody wants to go to hell
forever”. Many authors write in support of religion and we can find
books on the subject in most any bookshop one wish to visit. On the
other side of the coin we find those who totally oppose religion, many
books are found in most bookshops and libraries to this effect, like
for example the books of D.M Murdock alias Acharya.s, like “Christ
in Egypt”, Zachariah Sitchen’s 12 th Planet etc, none of which is bad
reading material, Murdock herself and Sitchen both has done
incredible research and cannot be defaulted for their efforts.
Like Murdock and Sitchen all the authors who have written both for
and against religion ultimately convey their own opinion about the
subject they write about. We as a people ultimately decide what we
want to believe or accept as ‘true’, and this is something we also do
with the different religious so called “holy scriptures”. How
‘convinced’ we become depend on how much ‘passion’ (which it
mostly is because concrete fact in regards to most religions is pretty
scarce, if at all) the religious or non religious advocates put into their
campaigns, looking at registered members of the different religions
most of their campaigns seems to be working quite effectively.
1
Mohammed, and more greatly on the Old Testament of the bible,
without which Muslims would probably not have existed.
What has been written down by the different scribes from plus
minus 40 years after the death of Jesus was done so from word of
mouth accounts by various people. The scribes had to make sense
from these accounts which forty years after the fact must have been
an incredibly difficult task in itself, also the religious leaders of the
time definitely had some influence on what was to be recorded and
how it should be stated. In plus minus 340 A.C Constantine realized
the value of this religion in regards to the governing of the world he
ruled and invited 1800 bishops to put all the scriptures into one book
which had to be distributed amongst his subjects.
2
physical? Do you understand now why the atheists cannot be blamed
or criticized for their disbelief?
Some of what you are going to read now can be verified, some cannot
be concretely proved, or even remotely proved, so please bear with
me. Christianity claim Jesus as the son of the God of the Old
Testament; but is he? Christianity claim itself to be the ultimate
religion or “truth” for that matter! But is it? Murdock says it’s all
myth, but is it? Sitchen have other ideas, is he right? The atheists
won’t have any of it, and discredit all of it, but can they? No scientist
up to date have proved or even remotely proved creation, many have
by way of theory tried to explain it, and we can applaud them for
their efforts, but that’s all it is; efforts! No more and no less.
The irony is the fact that we exist, religion claim it to be the work of
God, a statement they cannot prove, science have various ideas, none
of which can be proved either, the problem is that we exist and so do
millions of other star galaxies, al of which had to come from
somewhere or from something, it is common knowledge that
‘something’ cannot come from ‘nothing’, or so I hope to think, and
‘believe’. The man or ‘imaginary’ being called Jesus, by word of
mouth stated some highly interesting and sometimes very
controversial ‘things’. If one study the New Testament you get the
feeling that he (Jesus) seems to have spoken against some of his own
statements, which create the idea that perhaps he was speaking with
the proverbial “forked tongue”.
The man Jesus or the scriptures state that he said the following; you
do not know my Father! What was the reference to? A physical
being; or a spiritual being, he stated this to the religious leaders of
the time. They then argued that they only have one father
(Abraham), and his God is in fact their true Father? This motivated
3
the following statement from Jesus; “You have been praying to your
father, the Devil since the beginning!” In what context did he made
this statement? Let us assume he said it as he saw it or as we read it,
no hidden agenda’s, the people have worshipped something other
than the Father he talked about, then surely Christianity have no
foot to stand on, and he was not the son of God, but a ‘messenger’
perhaps, who tried his utmost to break religion, and was eventually
killed for his efforts, as can be derived from the statement Caiaphas
made: This high priest stated to the other religious leaders that it
would be better to have Jesus killed for the nation instead of having
the whole nation wiped out by the Roman empire! Because that
which he was preaching about differed greatly from that which their
priests were preaching to the Romans!
4
5