Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BRIDGE LAYOUTS
BY
CMDR. BERNARD GUIGNARD and CPT. EUGENIO ANGUEIRA
The bridge has always been the nerve center of all ships, whether they sail the seas or soar
through the stars. In this article we will review various bridge layouts for those ships that soar the
stars, the ships of Starfleet.
In the early days of Starfleet starship bridges were, to say the least, haphazard and not well
thought out. This created problems for the command staff, particularly during combat situations,
which needed to be addressed. When the decision to build Class One exploration Heavy Cruisers
was made, namely the Constitution-class, the team of Starfleet engineers assigned to the project was
instructed to review the recommendations made by the officers who had served on starships to date.
As a result, a more practical bridge layout was developed, one in which the captain could receive
information with great efficiency; a bridge that could actually function as the ships nerve center.
The layout was so well accepted that it was utilized in all Class One starships designed at the time,
namely the Ptolemy-class tugs, and the Saladin-class destroyers.
The first bridge design to be developed, the MK9BR-SH1, can be seen in Figure 1. This layout was
introduced with the Constitution-class and in the USS
Constitution herself. The internal layout for this bridge
design stayed almost the same for about 20 years. The
only revision made to this bridge design was introduced
as the SH2 with the upgrade of the Constitution-class to
the Achernar
subclass. This
layout (Figure
2) differs by the
addition of a
Figure 1. MK-9BR-SH1
door next to the
m a
i n
viewscreen, for access to the bridge Jeffries tubes, and
repositioning of several stations.
Further review of captains logs revealed that a
single turbolift elevator proved to be inconvenient in many
situations. It was, therefore, decided to address this
Figure 2. MK-9BR-SH2
inconvenience by the addition of a second turbolift shaft.
This required changes to the exterior hull design as well,
which were first introduced in the USS Hashira, a Surya-class exploration frigate. This bridge
layout, the SH3, resulted in an internal layout which no longer was skewed in an angle as with prior
layouts. This layout also introduced a forward-facing tactical station, separate from the helm.
-2-
-3-
Figure 7. MK-10BR-MH1
Further recommendations included the addition of a bridge head which could be accessed
via the turbolifts, and the addition of battery units and
independent life support units which would allow the
bridge to function independently of the rest of the ship in
the event of severe damage to the ship. Explosive bolts
were also added that would permit the bridge to function
as a lifepod in the event of an extreme emergency. This
new layout, the MH2, became the most widely used
design at the time, seeing service not only in Heavy
Cruisers but Frigates and Tugs as well.
Figure 8. MK-10BR-MH2
-4-
T
h
i
s
bridge layout also underwent some modifications resulting
in three more layouts that were used primarily in a few
Constitution-class starships. The first of these was the
MH-3. This bridge layout was designed to be used on
newly-built starships only while these were being tested
for performance. It was not intended to be any vessels
final bridge. It was first used in the USS Enterprise-A
immediately after its commissioning (the bridge module
was replaced shortly after the ships first run and before
Kirks encounter with Sybok). This layout had minimal
changes when
Figure 9. MK-10BR-MH3
compared to the
MH-2 but was
given a different designation because of its purpose. Its
most obvious change was the addition of certain structural
hardpoints. Yet another modification of this layout was
developed but never used, the MH-3a. This new layout
rearranged the bridge stations to the more traditional setup
because it introduced a new touch-screen system for the
stations
that
would permit
them to be
Figure 10. MK-10BR-MH3a
reprogrammed
for
different
tasks. The concept was accepted by both engineering
and command staffs but instead of using the MH-3a, an
entirely new bridge was developed for mass utilization of
the concept. This new layout, the MH-4, was introduced
in another Constitution-class vessel, the USS America, of
the America-subclass. The performance of the new
systems in this bridge layout was well beyond
expectatio
ns.
The
Figure 11. MK-10BR-MH4
ability to
change the configuration of a bridge station by means
of software allowed for reassignment of vital functions
to a different station with far more ease during combat
situations (should the primary station be damaged) and
maintained functionality even in extreme situations.
-5-
-6-
-7-
-8-