IE -256

Fall 2014

Engineering Management

Category For Evaluation

Possible Scor

1
2
Quality of Work: Consider the Produces unacceptable work,
Occasionally produces work
degree to which the student
fails to meet minimum group or that meets minimum group or
team member provides work
project requirements.
project requirements.
that is accurate and complete.
Timeliness of Work: Consider Fails to meet deadlines set by
the student team member's
group.
timeliness of work.

Occasionally misses deadlines

set by group.

Task Support: Consider the

amount of task support the
student team member gives to
other team members.

Sometimes gives task support to

other members.

Gives no task support to other

members.

Interaction: Consider how the Behavior is detrimental to

student team member relates
group.
and communicates to other
team members.

Behavior is inconsistent and

occasionally distracts group
meetings.

Responsibility: Consider the

ability of the student team
member to carry out a chosen
or assigned task, the degree to
which the student can be relied
upon to complete a task.
Involvement: Consider the
extent to which the student
team member participates in the
exchange of information (does
outside research, brings outside
knowledge to group).

Is unwilling to carry out

assigned tasks.

Sometimes carries out assigned

tasks but never volunteers to do
a task.

Fails to participate in group

discussions and fails to share
relevant material.

Sometimes participates in group

discussions and rarely
contributes relevant material for
the project.

Guidelines:

Disregard your general impressions and concentrate on one factor at a tim

Study carefully the definition given for each factor and the specifications

Call to mind instances that are typical of the student's work and behavior

Determine the category that best describes the group memebers' accomp

for both tasks: the case study presentation & discussion lead and the group p

Comments may be used to support your ratings where applicable.

Make sure to include yourself when filling out the evaluation form on th

If you are completely satisfied with your group performance as well as yourself yo
this particular case each group member will share exactly the same group grade.

Peer Evaluation
Possible Scores
3
Meets minimum group or
project requirements.

4
5
Regularly produces work that Produces work that consistently
meets minimum requirements exceeds established group or
and sometimes exceeds project project requirements.
or group requirements.

Regularly meets deadlines set

by group.

Consistently meets deadlines

set by group and occasionally
completes work ahead of
schedule.

Consistently completes work

ahead of schedule.

Occasionally provides task

support to other group
members.

Consistently provides task

support to other group
members.

Consistently gives more task

support than expected.

Regularly projects appropriate Consistently demonstrates

team behavior including:
appropriate team behavior.
listening to others, and allowing
his/her ideas to be criticized.
Carries out assigned tasks but
never volunteers to do a task.

Consistently demonstrates
exemplary team behavior.

Consistently carries out

Consistently carries out
assigned tasks and occasionally assigned tasks and always
volunteers for other tasks.
volunteers for other tasks.

Takes part in group discussions Regularly participates in group Consistently exceeds group
and shares relevant information. discussion and sometimes
expectations for participation
exceeds expectations.
and consistently contributes
relevant material to project.

centrate on one factor at a time.

factor and the specifications for each category.
student's work and behavior. Do not be influenced by unusual cases that are not typical.

he group memebers' accomplishments in that area and enter the number on the performance rating (out of 5)

scussion lead and the group paper.

ngs where applicable.

ut the evaluation form on the third page.

mance as well as yourself you can enter a default value of "5" on all categories. In
y the same group grade.

First Name

Last Name

Team Member Name:

Case Study Presentation and Discussio

Category For
Evaluation
Quality of Work:

Timeliness of Work:

Task Support:

Interaction:

Responsibility:

Involvement:
Overall Evaluation

Comments (optional):

Comments (optional):

Case Study Presentation and Discussion Lead

Consideration

(out of 5)

Consider the degree to which the team member provides

work that is accurate and complete.

Consider the team member's timeliness of work.

Consider the amount of task support the team member gives

to other team members.

Consider how the team member relates and communicates to

other team members.

Consider the ability of the team member to carry out a chosen

or assigned task, the degree to which the student can be relied
upon to complete a task.

Consider the extent to which the team member participates in

the exchange of information (does outside research, brings
outside knowledge to group).

Overall Evaluation

0.00

First Name

Last Name

Team Member Name:

Case Study Presentation and Discussio

Category For
Evaluation
Quality of Work:

Timeliness of Work:

Task Support:

Interaction:

Responsibility:

Involvement:
Overall Evaluation

Comments (optional):

Case Study Presentation and Discussion Lead

Consideration

(out of 5)

Consider the degree to which the team member provides

work that is accurate and complete.

Consider the team member's timeliness of work.

Consider the amount of task support the team member gives

to other team members.

Consider how the team member relates and communicates to

other team members.

Consider the ability of the team member to carry out a chosen

or assigned task, the degree to which the student can be relied
upon to complete a task.

Consider the extent to which the team member participates in

the exchange of information (does outside research, brings
outside knowledge to group).

Overall Evaluation

0.00

First Name

Last Name

Team Member Name:

Case Study Presentation and Discussio

Category For
Evaluation
Quality of Work:

Timeliness of Work:

Task Support:

Interaction:

Responsibility:

Involvement:
Overall Evaluation

Comments (optional):

Case Study Presentation and Discussion Lead

Consideration

(out of 5)

Consider the degree to which the team member provides

work that is accurate and complete.

Consider the team member's timeliness of work.

Consider the amount of task support the team member gives

to other team members.

Consider how the team member relates and communicates to

other team members.

Consider the ability of the team member to carry out a chosen

or assigned task, the degree to which the student can be relied
upon to complete a task.

Consider the extent to which the team member participates in

the exchange of information (does outside research, brings
outside knowledge to group).

Overall Evaluation

0.00

First Name

Last Name

Team Member Name:

Case Study Presentation and Discussio

Category For
Evaluation
Quality of Work:

Timeliness of Work:

Task Support:

Interaction:

Responsibility:

Involvement:
Overall Evaluation

Comments (optional):

Case Study Presentation and Discussion Lead

Consideration

(out of 5)

Consider the degree to which the team member provides

work that is accurate and complete.

Consider the team member's timeliness of work.

Consider the amount of task support the team member gives

to other team members.

Consider how the team member relates and communicates to

other team members.

Consider the ability of the team member to carry out a chosen

or assigned task, the degree to which the student can be relied
upon to complete a task.

Consider the extent to which the team member participates in

the exchange of information (does outside research, brings
outside knowledge to group).

Overall Evaluation

0.00

Case Study Presentation and Discussion Lead:

First Name

Last Name

Team Member-1

Abdullah

Badraig

Team Member-2

Abdullaslam

Alharby

Team Member-3

Sultan

Alhazmy

Team Member-4

Mahmod

Saif

Team Average

Average Score
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00