Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
G.R.No.164641.December20,2007.*
BANKOFTHEPHILIPPINEISLANDS,assuccessorofFarEastBank
and Trust Company, petitioner, vs. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION, REHABILITATION, RECEIVER, ASB HOLDINGS,
INC.,ASBDEVELOPMENTCORPORATION,ASBLAND,INC.,ASB
FINANCE,INC.,MAKATIHOPECHRISTIANSCHOOL,INC.,BEL
AIR HOLDINGS CORP., WINCHESTER TRADING, INC., VYL
DEVELOPMENT CORP., GERRICK HOLDINGS CORP.,
NEIGHBORHOODHOLDINGS,INC.,andTHECOURTOFAPPEALS,
respondents.
DacionEnPago;Contracts;Adacionenpagocontainedinarehabilitation
plan approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission does not impair the
contractualrightsofasecuredcreditorasthecreditorrefusetoenterintoadacion.
TheverysameissuesconfrontedtheCourtinthecaseof MetropolitanBank&
Trust Company v. ASB Holdings, et al., 517 SCRA 1 (2007). In this case,
MetropolitanBank&TrustCompany(MBTC)refusedtoenterintoadacionenpago
arrangement contained in ASBs proposed Rehabilitation Plan. MBTC argued,
amongothers,thattheforcedtransferofpropertiesandthediminutionofitsrightto
enforceitslienonthemortgagedpropertiesviolateitsconstitutionalrightagainst
impairmentofcontractsandrighttodueprocess.TheCourtruledthatthereisno
impairment of contracts because the approval of the Rehabilitation Plan and the
appointmentofarehabilitationreceivermerelysuspendstheactionforclaimsagainst
theASBGroup,andMBTCmaystillenforceitspreferencewhentheassetsofthe
ASBGroupwill beliquidated.Butif therehabilitationisfoundtobenolonger
feasible,thentheclaimsagainstthedistressedcorporationwouldhavetobesettled
eventuallyandthesecuredcreditorsshallenjoypreferenceovertheunsecuredones.
Moreover,theCourtstatedthatthereisnocompulsiontoenterintoadacionenpago
agreement,nortowaivetheinterests,penaltiesandrelatedcharges,sincetheseare
merely proposals to creditors such as MBTC, such that in the event the secured
creditorsrefusethedacion,theReha
_______________
*ENBANC.
295
VOL.541,DECEMBER20,2007
295
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
PETITIONforreviewoncertiorariofadecisionoftheCourtofAppeals.
ThefactsarestatedintheopinionoftheCourt.
MichaelG.Jornalesforpetitioner.
JunameC.DeLeonforF.B.Cruz.
Siazon,DeJesus&Salvadorforprivaterespondents.
Benjamin M. Javier, Jr. for private respondent ASB Group of
Companies.
TINGA,J.:
For resolution is a petition seeking to nullify the 30 January 2004
Decision1oftheCourtofAppealsinCAG.R.SPNo.
_______________
1Rollo,pp.1929.
296
296
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
Companyv.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission,etal.
3
Bank of the Philippine Islands (Successorininterest of Far East Bank and Trust
Company)v.HonorableHearingPanel,etal.
4 ASBRealtyCorporation,ASBDevelopmentCorporation,ASBLand,Inc.andASB
Holdings,Inc.havebeenrenamedSt.FrancisSquareRealtyCorporation,St.FrancisSquare
DevelopmentCorporation,St.FrancisSquareLand,Inc.,andSt.FrancisSquareHoldings,
Inc.,respectively.AmendedArticlesofIncorporationforthesaidcompanieswereapproved
by the SEC on 29 March 2007, 02 April 2007, 28 February 2007 and 12 April 2007,
respectively;Rollo,pp.201206.
5Id.,atp.6.
6Id.,atp.5.
7Id.,atpp.48126.
VOL.541,DECEMBER20,2007
297
297
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
298
298
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
VOL.541,DECEMBER20,2007
299
299
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
Phil.10;320SCRA279(1999).
28Rollo,p.200,citingLimv.SecretaryofAgriculture,No.L26990,31August1970,34
SCRA751.
300
300
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
32TheverysameRehabilitationPlanthatisthesubjectoftheinstantpetition.MBTCis
alsoacreditorofASBGroup.IntheRehabilitationPlan,ASBGroupproposedpaymentby
daciononsomeofthepropertiesmortgagedtoMBTC.
VOL.541,DECEMBER20,2007
301
301
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
MBTC,suchthatintheeventthesecuredcreditorsrefusethedacion,the
RehabilitationPlanproposestosettletheobligationstosecuredcreditors
withmortgagedpropertiesatsellingprices.
Rehabilitationproceedingsinourjurisdiction,muchlikethebankruptcy
lawsoftheUnitedStates,haveequitableandrehabilitativepurposes.On
the one hand, they attempt to provide for the efficient and equitable
distributionofaninsolventdebtorsremainingassetstoitscreditors;and
ontheother,toprovidedebtorswithafreshstartbyrelievingthemof
theweightoftheiroutstandingdebtsandpermittingthemtoreorganize
theiraffairs.33TherationaleofP.D.No.902A,asamended,istoeffecta
feasibleandviablerehabilitation,34bypreservingafounderingbusinessas
goingconcern,becausetheassetsofabusinessareoftenmorevaluable
whensomaintainedthantheywouldbewhenliquidated.35
TheCourtreiteratesthattheSECsapprovaloftheRehabilitationPlan
didnotimpairBPIsrighttocontract.Ascorrectlycontendedbyprivate
respondents, the nonimpairment clause is a limit on the exercise of
legislativepowerandnotofjudicialorquasijudicialpower. 36 TheSEC,
through the hearing panel that heard the petition for approval of the
RehabilitationPlan,wasactingasaquasijudicialbodyandthus,itsorder
approvingtheplancannotconstituteanimpairmentoftherightandthe
freedomtocontract.
Besides,themerefactthattheRehabilitationPlanproposesadacionen
pagoapproachdoesnotrenderitdefective
_______________
33WestmorelandHumanOpportunities,Inc,v.Walsh,246F.3d233,C.A.3(Pa),2001.
SeealsoInre:Epstein(39B.R.938,Bkrtcy.D.N.M.1984).
34Supranote27atp.25.
35Inre:EdwardR.Fitzsimmons,725F.2d1208,76A.L.R.Fed.845.
36
Bernas,
302
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATED
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
onthegroundofimpairmentoftherighttocontract.Dacionenpagoisa
special mode of payment where the debtor offers another thing to the
creditorwhoacceptsitasequivalentofpaymentofanoutstandingdebt. 37
Theundertakingreallypartakesinasenseofthenatureofsale,thatis,the
creditorisreallybuyingthethingorpropertyofthedebtor,thepayment
forwhichistobechargedagainstthedebtorsdebt.Assuch,theessential
elementsofacontractofsale,namely;consent,objectcertain,andcause
orconsiderationmustbepresent.38Beingaformofcontract,thedacionen
pago agreement cannot be perfected without the consent of the parties
involved.
Wefindnoelementofcompulsioninthe dacionenpagoprovisionof
theRehabilitationPlan.ItwasnottheonlysolutionpresentedbytheASB
topayitscreditors.Infact,itwasstatedintheRehabilitationPlanthat:
xxx.Ifthedacionenpagohereincontemplateddoesnotmaterializeforfailureof
thesecuredcreditorstoagreethereto,therehabilitationplancontemplatestosettlethe
obligations(withoutinterest,penaltiesandotherrelatedchargesaccruingafterthe
dateoftheinitialsuspensionorder)tosecuredcreditorswithmortgagedpropertiesat
ASBsellingpricesforthegeneralinterestoftheemployees,creditors,unitbuyers,
government,generalpublicandtheeconomy.39
338(2002).
39RehabilitationPlan,pp.1718;Rollo,pp.7071.
VOL.541,DECEMBER20,2007
303
303
BankofthePhilippineIslandsvs.SecuritiesandExchangeCommission
retainingitspreferenceoverunsecuredcreditorswhentheassetsofthe
corporationarefinallyliquidated.40
WHEREFORE,inviewoftheforegoing,thepetitionisDENIEDand
theDecisiondated30January2004oftheCourtofAppealsinCAG.R.
SPNo.77309isAFFIRMED.Costsagainstpetitioner.
SOORDERED.
Puno (C.J.), Quisumbing, YnaresSantiago, SandovalGutierrez,
AustriaMartinez, Corona, CarpioMorales, Azcuna,Velasco, Jr.,
Nachura,ReyesandLeonardoDeCastro,JJ.,concur.
Carpio,J.,OnLeave.
ChicoNazario, J., I certify that J. Nazario, concurred with the
Decision.(Sgd.Puno,C.J.)
Petitiondenied,judgmentaffirmed.
Notes.Itisnottheprovinceofcourtstoamendacontract.(Sabiovs.
InternationalCorporationBank,Inc.,364SCRA385[2001])
Equitycannotbeconsideredwherethereisacontractualstipulation.
(Tanvs.CourtofAppeals,367SCRA571[2001])
o0o
_______________
40 RizalCommercialBankingCorporationv.IntermediateAppellateCourt,supra note
27atp.26.
304
Copyright 2014 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.