This concerto was originally written by Mozart as an oboe concerto but was later adapted for flute at the request of flutist Ferdinand DeJean. It follows sonata form and features elements typical of classical era music such as a four bar phrase structure, contrasting themes, and ornamentation. While seen as too difficult for its time due to its florid flute writing, it has endured as an important part of the standard flute repertoire.
This concerto was originally written by Mozart as an oboe concerto but was later adapted for flute at the request of flutist Ferdinand DeJean. It follows sonata form and features elements typical of classical era music such as a four bar phrase structure, contrasting themes, and ornamentation. While seen as too difficult for its time due to its florid flute writing, it has endured as an important part of the standard flute repertoire.
This concerto was originally written by Mozart as an oboe concerto but was later adapted for flute at the request of flutist Ferdinand DeJean. It follows sonata form and features elements typical of classical era music such as a four bar phrase structure, contrasting themes, and ornamentation. While seen as too difficult for its time due to its florid flute writing, it has endured as an important part of the standard flute repertoire.
Flute Concerto in D Major, K. 314: Movt. I, Allegro
Aperto (1778) Recording: Emmanuel Pahud Berliner Philharmoniker YouTube Uploaded May 24, 2009 Flute Concerto in D Major, K. 314 was written for the Dutch flutist, Ferdinand DeJean, who had requested four quartets and three concertos for flute. Mozart was running behind on the order (the excuse for the incompletion, which he wrote to his father, was You know how laggard I become when obliged to write for an instrument which I cannot bear), and so he reworked his oboe concerto in C Major (originally written for Giussepe Ferlindis) into a flute concerto. During Mozarts time it was commonplace for composers to rework their own music for another instrument. DeJean, however, found the resemblance to be too similar, and refused to pay for a piece that was not original. This concerto follows the form of the sonata form with a double exposition (where the exposition is first stated my the tutti, but does not land in the dominant chord until the exposition is repeated by the soloist). The double exposition is stated over the course of bars 1-107, and remains in the key of D major. The first statement of the exposition is stated from bar 1-32 before the flute comes in: The first theme from measure 1-11, and the second theme from measure 12-26. The second statement of the exposition begins in measure 32 when the flute makes a flamboyant entrance. The first theme is repeated by the flute from bars 32-77, remaining in the key of D major. The second theme, how ever, is repeated from bars 78-96, venturing over to the key of A major. Measures 96-107 stays in the key of A Major, tying a pretty little bow on the exposition. fter the exposition, the development begins in measure 106. It starts in A major, but quickly finds itself in an unstable harmonic position until it transitions to a secure D major chord in the down beat of measure 120. Between measures 120 and 173 lies the recapitulation, which Mozart restates the first and second theme but migrates to a minor key as he does so. From about 173 onward to the end (including the cadenza), we have a sprightly coda to finish up the piece.
In addition to this piece being in sonata form a form that became
popular in the classical period, there are many other stylistic considerations that bring to mind the classical era. The phrasing of this movement largely subscribes to the four bar structure that became popular during the classical period, as can be seen in measures 39-42. While the phrasing often vacates from this structure, the most secure of the phrases follows this formula. As well, the texture suggests the work of the classical period: After the first statement of the exposition ends in the orchestra in bar 31, the part of the orchestra is much less ornate and becomes a subordinate voice to the line of the solo flute, closely following the formula for homophonic texture. An example of this can be seen starting in measure 37, where the orchestra lays down repeated eighth-note chords. While the accompaniment is subordinate, it still plays a very important role in setting up the mood of the piece, particularly in the development and recapitulation. For example, in measure 109 the flute plays a simple motif that has a sense of instability, but underneath the orchestra solidifies the sense of harmonic instability with repeated seven chords. Another aspect of this piece that fits snugly into the mold of classical perioc music is simply the fact that it is easy to listen to: Mozart once said about three of his piano concertos that they were a happy medium between what is too easy and too difficult They are very brilliant, pleasing to the ear, and natural, without being vapid. This flute concerto is very similar, in that they are well-balanced between consistency and contrast. The first theme and the second theme, while not drastically different, bring different things to the table: The first theme is bold and decisive, while the second theme is a bit more flirtatious and sly. This type of very careful contrasting was common in the classical era, and Mozart was masterful at this balancing act in this way, this piece fits very well into the puzzle of the repertoire of the classical era. The ornamentation throughout the written music as well as the recording is a very good example of the classical period: There are many flourishes, trills, and appoggiaturas. One example of this can be seen in the trill of the primary motif in measure 31 with a quick trill followed by a speedy flourish. In the beginning of the second theme (measure 12), there is an example of a longer appoggiatura. Yet another example of classical ornamentation can be heard in measure 46 leading into measure 47 of the recording listed by Emmanuel Pahud: Though it is not written in the score, throughout the classical period performers would often trill on the second degree of the scale to build tension, and then add a turn as they landed on the tonic (For example: EFEFEFDED). In addition to the ornamentation used in the performance, the listener should also take note of the spectacular
cadenza that Pahud offers: As expected from any good classical
cadenza, it feels improvised and spontaneous. It is creative and surprising, but does not wander too far from the melodic content of the piece. One aspect of this piece that sets it apart from other classical music though it is a perfect example of Mozarts writing is the sheer amount of notes splattered on the page throughout the flute part. From the opening line to the end of the cadenza, the flute part is inundated with sixteenth notes, something that was not particularly common in the classical era. Indeed, this is the very reason that Mozart was not particularly popular in his own time. The Emperor Joseph II is said to have complained, Too many notes after the performance of one of his operas. (Bonds, 348) This flute concerto is an example of what would have been considered too complicated at the time. While this flute concerto caught a lot of flack for being a rip off and too difficult during its earliest years and while the composer himself despised the instrument it was written for, it has endured as a very important contribution to the standard flute repertoire. Even those who are not particularly fond of the piece find themselves with the catchy, singable themes stuck in their heads for days after one listen.