Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neither Hamlet nor Claudius can act upon their thoughts so both characters must
use others to carry out their actions. Shakespeares structural technique mise en
abyne of The Mousetrap adds multiple levels of complexity thought and action
processes of Claudius and Hamlet. In the case of Hamlet, we see him doubt
some foul play from the beginning, when he is told about his fathers apparition.
After he talks with the ghost and is convinced that it is an honest ghost, he still
dare not carry out the vengeance immediately. Hamlet feigns madness and uses
a pantomime together with the players perturbing dialogue in The Mousetrap
to metaphorically catch the conscience of the King. Claudius enquires if there's
any offense in the play, and Hamlet's mocking replies suggest that there is
indeed. When Claudius learns his deception has been discovered, he takes action
through others by sending Hamlet to England to be killed. When that plan does
not succeed, he sets up Laertes to kill Hamlet in a fencing match. These bold
action are the antithesis of Hamlet carefully planned revenge of Claudius. Even
when Hamlet has the chance to kill Claudius at prayers he cannot do it. The
similarity of the inability to carry out cruel acts personally is dramatically ironic
as Claudius uses true Machiavellian tactics to gain power at any cost. However
Hamlet relies on his conscious and morals and takes time to process his actions.
It is this ongoing conflict of characters through natural human emotion that
contributes to the plays enduring value.