Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vol.46no.2DarwinianSanIsidroAug./Dec.2008
INTRODUCTION
Rebutia lowercase K. Schum. is the type of the genus and one of the five
cited by Kiesling (1999) for Argentina species. It presents a great variability in
their habit, shape and size of the stem, dis position of their hubs, number,
length and color of the thorns, so does the color of its flowers between red
and orange and the arrangement of flowers along the stem. The areolas floral
ornamentation, presence or absence of hairs and bristles, and the degree of
welding of style with the floral tube, are also variable traits within the species,
which can be interpreted in different ways. Buxbaum (1953) mentions that
in R. lowercase floral areolas have hairs or bristles and the floral tube is
welded to the base of the style. In contrast, and using that name in a broader
sense, Hjertson (2005) distinguishes R. lowercase , among other characters,
by having floral areolas hairy, with or without bristles and "solid floral tube", ie,
style, partly welded to the tube.
Moreover, Hjertson (2005) recognizes R. wessneriana Bewer. as a synonym
of R. lowercase characters but does not specify that it is based to synonymy,
whereas Kiesling (1999) treated R. wessneriana as a synonym
of R. marsoneri Werderm,. throughout the previous
literature R. wessneriana and R. lowercase are treated as different species,
mainly by the soldier style floral tube flower larger and more intense red
in R. wessnerianaand freestyle in R. lowercase .
The purpose of this research was to circumscribe R. lowercase based on the
exomicromorfolgicas characteristics presented in their natural habitat, and
discuss its relationship with R. wess-neriana . The characteristics studied are
documented with illustrations and photographs, geographic distribution
information is provided both altitudinal and latitudinal, ecological and
phenological observations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive assessment of the exo-micromorphological characteristics
in natural populations in the upper montane forest and high pastures of the
provinces of Catamarca, Tucumn, Salta and Jujuy was performed. Original
descriptions and herbarium specimens available in BAB, CTES, LIL, SI, SGO
(Holmgren et al., 1990) were analyzed.
Pollen and seed materials come from samples collected from their
habitat. Pollen grains were acetolyzed according technique Erdt-man (1960)
and mounted in glicerinagelatina. The observations were made with an optical
microscope (OM) Wild. For analysis of sculpture exine material not
acetolizado was used metallized do with gold vapor and microfotogra-rays
were obtained with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) Jeol 35 CF Service
Electron Microscopy, National University of Tucumn .
to observe seed SEM, washed repeatedly with distilled water and mounted in
synthetic enamel specimen holder and coated with gold vapor, then
photomicrographs were obtained with the same scanning electron microscope
(SEM). For descriptions of the terminology seeds Barthlott & Hunt (2000) was
followed.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Fig 1. bean pollen R. lowercase subsp. wessne-Saharan Africa . A, polar view. B, equatorial
view. C, detail of exine (of 390 Muruaga, LIL).
Figure 2. Pollen Grain R. lowercase subsp. lowercase . A, equatorial view. B, detail of exine
(of 298 Muruaga , LIL).
The seeds in both taxa are oval, small (0.8-1.2 mm long.), Brilliant black, the
head cells are generally isodiametric, tetragonal to hexagonal, with limit
anticlinal ribbed, straight and well intracellular gap differentiated and
embossed convex; testa cells seed apex shaped projections have acuminata
or are truncated and the side of lower dome shaped cones, gradually become
smaller in the edge region hilomicropilar; which is oblique and large ( Figs
3.and 4 ).
Figure 3. seed R. lowercase subsp. lowercase . A, detail of testa cells of the apex of the
seed. B, testa cells of striated anticlinal walls ( Muruaga 298, LIL).
Figure 4. seed R. lowercase subsp. wessneriana . A, detail of apex cells of the seed. B cells
testa smooth anticlinal walls (Muruaga 390 , LIL).
Moreover, R. marsoneri differs from R. lowercase for having a depressedglobose stem to 4 cm diam., areolas with 9-15 spines 3-5 mm long. and red or
yellow flowers.
TAXONOMIC TREATMENT
Rebutia lowercase K. Schum., Monatsschr. Kakteenk. 5 (7):
102. 1895. Echinopsis minus culaFAC Weber in Bois, Dict. Hort. 1:
471. 1896. Echinocactus minusculus FAC Weber in Bois, Dict.Hort. 1:
467. 1896. TYPE: sn icon in Schumann, Monatsschr. Kakteenk. 5 (7):
102. 1895, reproduced by Schumann in Gesamtb. Kakteen: 395, fig. 67. 1898
(lectotype been appointed by M. Hjertson, Cact Init Syst 19:.... 20
2005). Fig. Six .
5. 1959. TYPE: Argentina, Jujuy, "Volcano unten" F. Ritter 58 . Loc 2 (sa) (SGO-124559
neotype here designated).
Style floral tube welded to the base to 10 mm long., Free in ca. 12 mm long.,
White, red to pink. Seeds with testa cells smooth anticlinal walls.
Geographical distribution and habitat. It lives in the town of Volcano, Province
of Jujuy, and grows rooted in the clefts of the rocks on the rocky hillsides.
Observations . With no existing material on which the name of the original
taxon was based Rebutia calliantha neotype is designated.
Representative material examined
ARGENTINA. Jujuy . Dept.. Tumbaya, Volcano, Laguna, 19-I-1998, Kiesling
8901 (SI), Volcano, 31-X-1974, MC-8 (BAB), Volcano, Laguna, 2092 m sm 11X-2004, 390 Muruaga ( LIL).
Invalid Names
Rebutia hyalacantha (Backeb.) Backeb in Backeberg, Die Cactaceae 3:.
1551. 1959. nom. illeg.as superfluous, by including R. wessneriana between
synonyms and therefore its type (Greuter et al., 2000. Art. 52.1).
Rebutia permutata Heinrich in Backeberg, Descr. Cat Nov. 3:
13.1963. nom. inval. lack of mention of type item (Greuter et al., 2000. Art.
37.1).
Rebutia wessneriana Bewer. . var permutata (Heinrich) Buining & Donald,
succulenta 51 (12): 225, 1972. comb. inval. because its basionym is invalid.
Rebutia xanthocarpa Backeb. var. violaciflora (Backeb.) Backeb in Backeberg,
Descr. Cat Nov. 1: 31. 1956. nom. inval. lack of mention of the basionym
(Greuter et al., 2000. Art. 33.3).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Fundacin Miguel Lillo by the total support that has enabled this work
to be carried out. Reviewers for their valuable suggestions, Mr. Alberto Gutierrez conducting
sheets and the curators of the herbaria for the loan of the requested material.
REFERENCES
1 Backeberg, C. 1932. Rebutien. Freund Kakteen- 1 (11): 123-125. [ Links ]
2 Backeberg, C. 1977. Cactus Lexicon . Blandford Press, Dorset. [ Links ]
3 Backeberg, C. & FM Knuth. 1936. Kaktus-ABC. Copenhagen. [ Links ]
4 Barthlott, W. & D. Hunt. 2000. Seed-diversity in the Cactaceae Subfamily
Cactoideae. Succulent Plant Research , 5: 1-173. David Hunt, Milborne
Port. England. [ Links ]
5 Buxbaum, F. 1953. Morphology of Cacti. Section II. Morphology of the flower, pp. Fig.169351 and 93-170. EB Kurtz, Jr. (ed.).Abbey Garden Press. Pasadena. California. [ Links ]
6 Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr. 54: 561-564. [ Links ]