Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M. Pal*, B. K. Mahapatra
Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Sector-V, Salt Lake
City, Kolkata 700091, India
B. Mondal
Aquaculture Management and Technology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, India
e-mail: monalisapal08@gmail.com
*Correspondence
highly significant justifying a strong relationship between L-W of P. sophore (r=0.934). The functional
form of relationship between L-W of the species is
established as Log W= 2.130 + 3.242 Log L. The
fitted equation is a good fit as can seen from the coefficient of determination value (R2 = 0.871). The mean
condition factor of the fish was found to 1.10 indicating good condition of the fish.
Keywords Sophore barb, Length-weight relationship, Puntius, Correlation, Condition factor.
Introduction
Length weight relationship as well as the condition
factors is useful parameters for assessing the wellbeing of the individuals and for determining possible
differences among different stocks of the same species (1). It helps for estimating the weight from the
known length and vice-versa, duration of gonadal
maturation, increase or decrease in feeding activity,
possibly due to modifications in food resources (2).
In fisheries science, the condition factor is used to
compare the condition, fatness or well being of
fish. It is based on the hypothesis that heavier fish of
a particular length are in a better physiological condition. Condition factor is also a useful index for monitoring of feeding intensity, age, and growth rates in
fish. It is strongly influenced by both biotic and abiotic environmental conditions and can be used as an
index to assess the status of the aquatic ecosystem
1256
In the present study the length weight data were anaTable 1. Descriptive statistics of P. sophore (combined group)
length-weight characteristics.
Sta
tistic
Std.
error
Std.
deviation
Statistic
6.7706
0.03958
0.86981
3.9275
0.08873
1.95009
MiniN
mum
Sta- Statis- tistic
tic
Length
(cm)
Weight
(g)
Maximum
Statistic
Mean
1257
Model
R
square
Adjusted
R
square
0.934 a
0.871
0.871
Std.
error
of the
estimate
0.06684
Regression
Residual
Total
df
Mean
square
14.567
2.149
16.717
481 0.004
482
Sig.
Model
14.567 3.260E3
Unstandardized
coefficients
Std.
B
error
Standardized
coefficients
Beta
Sig
0.000 a
(Constant)
Log L.
- 2.130
3.242
0.047
0.057
0.934
- 45.259
57.099
0.000
0.000
1258
SPSS output for estimation and testing the significance of regression (ANOVA) is presented in Table 3.
Thereafter, the significant of calculated regression is
tested through ANOVA which is represented in Table
4, we found that this regression co-efficient (b) was
highly significant. The functional form of relationship between length and weight was calculated based
on formula W = aLb (log W = log a + b logL). In this
case a was found to be 2.130 and b was 3.242 (Table
4). Further b was found to be highly significant as
evidenced from t test presented in that table no-4.
Here the calculated value of t is found to be 57.099
which is much higher from the tabulated value of t
justifying that the regression co-efficient calculated
based on L-W data of P. sophore is significant. Now
established between length-weight relationship based
on empherial data as
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Log W = 2.130 + 3.242 Log L
The coefficient of determination R2 is 0.871 that indicates a very good fit of model.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
King M (2007) Fisheries biology, assessment and management. 2nd edn. Blackwell Sci Publ, Oxford.
Bhattacharya P, Banik S (2012) Length weight relationship and condition factor of the pabo fish Ompokpabo (Hamilton, 1822) from Tripura, India: Ind
J Fish 59 : 141146.
Hamilton F (1822) An account of the fishes found
in the river Ganges and its branches. Fishes of Ganges.
Edinburgh & London, pp. 405.
Talwar PK, Jhingran AG (1991) Inland fishes of India
and adjacent countries. Oxford and IBH Publ Co Pvt
Ltd, India. 1 & 2 : 1158.
Samad MA, Galib SM, Flowra FA (2009) Fish drying
in Chalan Beel areas, Bangladesh J Sci Ind Res
44 : 461466.
Craig JF, Halls AS, Barr JJF, Bean CW (2004) The
Bangladesh floodplain fisheries. Fish Research 66 :
271286.
Rahman AKA (2005) Fresh fishes of Bangladesh.
2nd eds, Zool Soc of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh,
pp. 364.
Froese R, Pauly D (eds). (2011) Fish base 2011.
World Wide Web electronic publication. Available at:
http://www.fishbase.org
Balasundaram C, Arumugam R, Murugan PB (2000)
Fish diversity of Kolli hills, Western Ghats, Salem
district, Tamil Nadu. Zoos Print J 16 : 403406.
Dua A, Parkash C (2009) Distribution and abundance
of fish populations in Harike wetland-A Ramsar site
in India. J Environm Biol 30 : 247251.
Sarkar UK, Gupta BK, Lakra WS (2010) Biodiversity,
ecohydrology, threat status and conservation priority
of the fresh water fishes of river Gomti, a tributary
of river Ganga (India). Environm entalist 30 : 317.
Hossain MY, Ahmed ZF, Leunda PM, Islam AKMR,
Jasmine S, Oscoz J, Miranda R, Ohtomi J (2006)
Length-weight and length-length relationships of
some small indigenous fish species from the Mathabhanga River, southwestern Bangladesh. J Applied Ichthyol 25 : 301303.
Tareque AMHB, Biswas B, Hossain MS, Rahman MM,
Rahman MM (2009) Some aspects of biology of
Puntius sophore (Hamilton) collected from the
Mouri river Khulna, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Res
Publ J 2 : 406422.
Bhuiyan AS, Parveen AS (1998). Fecundity of Puntius
sophore (Hamilton) (Cyprinidae : Cypriniformes). J
Bio-Sci 6 : 153154.
Srivastava R, Singh HR (2003). Length-weight relationship of Puntius sophore (Ham.) from Allahabad
region. Proc Nat Acad Sci India, 73B : 1318.
Phukon HK, Biswas SP (2012) Observation on
the Maturity index and fecundity of Puntius sophore
1259
17.
18.
19.
20.