Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10725-014-0013-y
REVIEW PAPER
changes in expression of genes involved in their biosynthesis and the responses they regulate. Present review
described the potential role of different phytohormones and
their balances against salinity stress and summarized the
research progress regarding plant responses towards
salinity at physiological and molecular levels. We
emphasized the role of abscisic acid, indole acetic acid,
cytokinins, gibberellic acid, salicylic acid, brassinosteroids,
jasmonates, ethylene and triazoles in mediating plant
responses and discussed their crosstalk at various baseline
pathways transduced by these phytohormones under
salinity. Current progress is exemplified by the identification and validation of several significant genes that
enhanced crops tolerance to salinity, while missing links on
different aspects of phytohormone related salinity tolerance
are pointed out. Deciphering mechanisms by which plant
S. Hassan
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar 25000,
Pakistan
A. Matloob A. Khaliq
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad,
Punjab 38040, Pakistan
F. A. Khan
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and
Reproduction, Huazhong Agricultural University,
Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
D. Shan
Women Institute of Learning, Abbottabad, Pakistan
N. Ullah
Department of Plant and Food Sciences, The University
of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
M. Faiq M. R. Khan A. K. Tareen
Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
N. Ullah
Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Nankai University,
Tianjin, China
S. Saud
Department of Horticultural, Northeast Agricultural University,
Harbin 150030, China
123
perceives salinity and trigger the signal transduction cascades via phytohormones is vital to devise salinity related
breeding and transgenic approaches.
Keywords Abiotic stress Climate change Plant growth
regulators Phytohormones Salinity Stress tolerance
Introduction
World population is envisaged to increase by 34 % in 2050
reaching about 9.1 billion, thus necessitating 70 % more food
production (FAO 2009). Fulfilling food requirement of a
burgeoning population remains a challenging task as climate
changes have endangered the sustainability and productivity
of the agricultural production systems (Hussain et al. 2014).
Plants are exposed to a variety of abiotic stresses under field
conditions. Modern agriculture too faces several abiotic
stresses, such as sub-optimal levels of salinity, drought,
chilling and heat as major constraint affecting crop yields
(Tardieu and Tuberosa 2010; Saud et al. 2013). More than
50 % reduction in average yield of major crops has been
attributed to the abiotic stresses (Wang et al. 2001). Crop
plants elicit a complex and unique cellular and molecular
response in response to various stresses in order to prevent the
damage and ensure survival (Fahad et al. 2015). Although the
underlying mechanisms of abiotic stresses may vary
depending upon the specific nature and extent of stress, stage
and duration of plant exposure, yet the ultimate outcome of
exposure to stress is the reduction in germination, growth and
final yield of crops (Parida and Das 2005; Munns and Tester
2008). Plants employ many strategies in response to abiotic
stresses that ultimately enhance the plant growth and productivity in stressful environments. These phenomena include
change in morphological and developmental pattern (growth
plasticity) as well as physiological nd biochemical processes
against several stresses (Tuteja 2007; Saud et al. 2014).
Adaptation to all these stresses is accompanied with metabolic
adjustments that lead to the accumulation of several organic
solutes like sugars, polyols, betaines and proline, protection of
cellular machinery, maintenance of ionic homeostasis, scavenging of free radicals, expression of certain proteins and upregulation of their genes and induction of phytohormones
(Parida and Das 2005; Tuteja 2007; Munns and Tester 2008).
Phytohormones, often regarded as plant growth regulators
in literature refer to the compounds derived from plant biosynthetic pathways that can act either locally (at the site of
their synthesis) or transported to some other site within plant
body to mediate growth and development responses of both
under ambient and stressful conditions (Peleg and Blumwald
2011). Growth and development in the sessile plants is regulated in a coordinated fashion by the activity of several
phytohormones like abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellins (GA),
123
Regions
Saline soils
Sodic soils
Mha
Mha
%
1.8
Africa
1,899
39
2.0
34
3,107
195
6.3
249
8.0
Europe
2,011
0.3
73
3.6
Latin America
2,039
61
3.0
51
2.5
Near East
1,802
92
5.1
14
0.8
North America
1,924
0.2
15
0.8
12,781
397
3.1
436
3.4
Worlds total
123
closure (Wilkinson and Davies 2010). This stomatal closure upon exposure to salinity is presumably because of
ABA-induced increased concentration of Ca?? in cytoplasm. Succeeding activation of ion channels in plasma
lemma, and turgor losses by guard cells are also related to
ABA-induced augmentation of H2O2 production that
serves as an intermediate signal of ABA in stomatal closure
process (Kim and Wang 2010). This phytohormone is also
crucial regarding synthesis and accumulation of osmoprotectants like proline (Iqbal et al. 2014) and dehydrins in
response to ROS generation under salt-stress-induced
dehydration (Szabados and Savoure 2009; Hara 2010). The
ABA-mediated accumulation of H2O2 causes generation of
NO that in turn activates mitogen-activated protein kinase
(MAPK) thus upregulating genes for antioxidant enzymes
to scavenge ROS (Zhang et al. 2007a; Lu et al. 2009). The
positive influence of ABA in conferring salinity adaptation,
manifested in the form of reduced Na? concentration and
its shoot translocation has been documented (Khadri et al.
2007). The presence of ABA caused significant increase in
vacuolar contents of Na? while discouraging its xylem
transport and plasmalemma influx in barley (Hordeum
vulgare L.) roots (Behl and Jeschke 1981). Exogenous
application of ABA was helpful in averting accumulation
of toxic Cl-1 ions in citrus leaves thereby limiting ETHY
release and leaf abscission under salinity (Gomez et al.
2002). Increase in K?/Na? in response to exogenous
application of ABA was conducive to salinity tolerance in
rice (Bohra et al. 1995). Recently, Gurmani et al. (2013)
documented that exogenous application of ABA was
effective in averting ionic content of Na? and Cl- and
Na?/K? ratio in rice. These authors further concluded that
ABA increased rice grain yield by increasing accumulation
of proline, soluble sugars and K? and Ca?? homeostasis.
There is strong experimental evidence that supports the
notion of increased membrane stability owing to greater
Ca?? uptake as the ABA contents increased under salt
stress (Parida and Das 2005). Zorb et al. (2014) found
significant increase in ABA concentration in leaves of salt
resistant maize hybrids under salinity. They argued that
such an increase is indispensable for acidifying the apoplast as a growth prerequisite. Similar findings are also
reported for salt resistant genotype of tomato that recorded
higher ABA concentration in xylem sap under salinity
(Amjad et al. 2014).
Application of ABA exogenously at 100 lM to Indica
rice seedlings improved survival rate by 20 % and provoked accumulation of proline via expression of OsP5CS1
gene in rice. Salt-stress-induced expression of OsP5CS1
gene required increase in endogenous ABA level (Sripinyowanich et al. 2013); (Mahajan and Tuteja 2005) stated
that various transcription factors regulate the ABAresponsive gene expression. Salinity stress is known to up-
123
et al. 2000; Fahad et al. 2014). Seed priming with CKs was
reported to increase plant tolerance to salinity stress (Iqbal
et al. 2006). These authors inferred that decreased concentration of ABA in plants developing from kinetin
primed seeds was possibly responsible for alleviation of
salt stress in wheat. Application of CKs can reverse leaf
and fruit abscission that are induced by ABA or water
stress. Contrary to ABA that inhibits germination; CKs
release seed dormancy. They act as ABA antagonists and
IAA antagonists/synergists in various plant processes (Iqbal et al. 2006) and help alleviating salinity stress (Iqbal
et al. 2014). Decrease in CKs level has been suggested as
an early response to salt stress; nevertheless, influence of
salinity on salt-sensitive variety of tomato was not mediated by Cks since reduction in growth preceded any decline
in Cks (Walker and Dumbroff 1981). During plant growth
and development, CKs are master regulators, and were
recently shown to control plant adaptation to salt stress
(Hadiarto and Tran 2011). Wu et al. (2013) reported
increased salinity tolerance via increased proline contents
in egg plant under exogenous application of CKs. Under
salinity, CKs play an important role by acting as an
intermediate in the demonstration of protective role of
epibrassinolide and methyl jasmonate in wheat (Shakirova
et al. 2010). Inhibition of K-shuttle activity limits CKs
transport under salinity (Cruz et al. 1995) and decreased
level of CKs have been reported in root and shoot of
resistant barley plants just after addition of 65 mM NaCl to
the nutrient solution. Nevertheless, adverse influence of
salinity on growth of salt-sensitive plants preceded the
lowering of CKs in levels suggesting genotypic specificity
(Kuiper et al. 1989). The concentrations of zeatin (Z),
zeatin riboside (ZR), isopentenyl adenine (iP), and isopentenyl adenine (iPA) in shoots and roots of barley cultivars decreased significantly after exposure to salinity
(Kuiper et al. 1990). In salt-sensitive variety of barley,
addition of benzyl adenin inhibited its growth, but in a salttolerant variety it overcame the negative impact on growth
rate, shoot/root ratio and internal CKs content (Kuiper et al.
1990). Chakrabarti and Mukherji (2003) reported that Kinetin acts as a direct free radical scavenger or it may also
involve in the antioxidative mechanism that are related to
the safety of purine breakdown. In stress responses, a
possible involvement of genes is often inferred from
changes in the transcript abundance in response to a given
stress trigger. In stress-response assays functional analyses
of CKs receptor mutants exhibited that all three CKs
receptors of Arabidopsis act as negative regulators in ABA
signaling and in the osmotic stress responses. CKs dependence of this activity was demonstrated for CRE1/AHK4
(Tran et al. 2007). Expression of a great number of stressinduced genes is regulated by plant hormones, including
CKs. Merchan et al. (2007) reported that CKs receptor
123
123
Fig. 1 Effect of salicylic acid on root length of maize under salinity stress. Salicylic acid application improved the growth of maize root under
saline condition as compared to stress conditions without salicylic acid application
123
need to be done to unravel the exact pathway of SA biosynthesis, whether major or minor, important regulatory
point of its biosynthesis, mode of action and other key and
mutual regulatory roles performed by SA that have
remained elusive up to date. Exploring interaction of SA
with other phytohormones also remains a germane issue to
be addressed in the current context as the SA is excessively
involved in crosstalk with other phytohormones or can alter
their biosynthesis (Pieterse et al. 2009).
Brassinosteroids (BRs)
The BRs are a group of naturally occurring novel steroidal
phytohormones comprising of brassiniloide (BL), castasetrone (CS) and their various derivatives that regulate
plant growth and development by producing an array of
physiological changes (Khripach et al. 2000; Kartal et al.
2009). They can occur either freely or conjugated to
sugars or fatty acids. BRs are involved in a wide range of
activities including seed germination, vascular differentiation, pollen tube growth, epinasty and leaf bending,
activation of proton pump, ETHY, nucleic acids and
protein biosynthesis and photosynthesis, reproductive
growth, and production of flowers and fruit (Khripach
zdemir et al. 2004; Hayat et al. 2010; Fahad
et al. 2000; O
et al. 2015). They are also known to ameliorate the ill
effects of salinity on plant growth performance (Zhu 2002;
Krishna 2003; Zhang et al. 2007b; Kartal et al. 2009;
Wang et al. 2011). Exogenous application of BRs ameliorated the adverse effects of salt stress on seed germination, root elongation and subsequent growth of rice by
restoring pigment levels and increasing nitrate reductase
activity (Anuradha and Rao 2001). Krishna (2003) found
that pre-incubation of barley leaf segments with BRs
before exposure to salinity (0.5 M NaCl) was effective in
reducing salt-stress-induced damage to cell ultrastructures
like nuclei and chloroplast. BRs are known to play a vital
role in the regulation of ion uptake (Khripach et al. 2000).
Seed treatment with BL significantly increased the dry
mass accumulation and activities of antioxidant enzymes
in lucerne under salinity (Zhang et al. 2007b). While
zdemir et al. (2004) found that
studying on rice, O
24-epibrassinolide treatment considerably improved seed
germination, seedling growth, antioxidative system, proline content; while reduced the lipid peroxidation under
salinity stress. The positive mediation of developmental
aspects by BRs under salinity is well supported by the
findings of studies that focused on 24-epibassinolide (24EBL) treatment to counter salinity in brassica (Kagale
et al. 2007), Arabidopsis (Divi et al. 2010), rice (Anuradha
zdemir et al. 2004). Exogenous appliand Rao 2001; O
cations of BRs resulted in modulation of both enzymatic
and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants subjected to
123
tolerant to salt stress but has small rosette and early flowering. Between these two extreme situations the plant needs
to make adjustment (Cao et al. 2007). At various levels
fine-tuning may make plants in an active homeostasis, and
then under stress condition the plants can survive better and
have relatively normal growth.
Based on the mutant analysis of triple responses of etiolated seedlings treated with ETHY, a signal transduction
pathway of ETHY has been put forward in Arabidopsis that
involves ETHY receptors, CTR1, EIN2, and EIN3, and
other components (Guo and Ecker 2004). In Arabidopsis
five receptor genes have been found, and based on structural features they are categorized into two subfamilies.
Subfamily I includes ETR1 and ERS1. Subfamily II
includes ETR2, EIN4, and ERS2. All these receptors of
ETHY can bind ETHY, and ETR1 has his kinase activity
(Hall et al. 2000).
ETHY signaling is significant in regulating plant growth
and stress responses, and ETHY functions through its
receptors. Plants responses to abiotic stresses are mediated
by changes by variation in the expression level of ETHY
receptors and salinity reduced the expression of ETHY
receptor ETR1 in Arabidopsis. Glycine betaine mediated
salt tolerance in wheat showed involvement of ETHY
(Khan et al. 2013). Though it is usually believed that
ETHY signaling functions in multiple stress responses, it is
not clear that under salt stress what specific roles the
receptors can play. Cao et al. (2007) transformed a tobacco
type II ETHY receptor homolog gene NTHK1 into Arabidopsis and observed that the resulting transgenic plants,
with NTHK1 mRNA and protein expression, were salt
sensitive as can be seen from high electrolyte leakage, and
decreased root growth under salt stress. Over expression of
NTHK1 in the transgenic plants seems to represent gain of
function of ETHY receptor suggesting the receptor functioning as the basis of salt-sensitive responses. The high
electrolyte leakage can be entirely or partly suppressed by
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid treatment, recommending that a negative effect exerts by ETHY on its
receptors. In sum, Plants have evolved various specific
mechanisms to adapt themselves to the changing environment. ETHY signaling is one of these pathways that plants
have adopted for regulation of salt stress responses. However, many enigmas inside in the ETHY signaling pathway
remain to be elucidated.
Triazoles (TR)
These are a group of compounds that can be exploited as
either plant growth regulators or fungicides; nevertheless,
in different degrees they manifest both properties. Their
protective role in various biotic and abiotic stresses has
been reported in plants (Fletcher et al. 2000). Among
123
123
References
Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T,
Van Der Straeten D, Peng J, Harberd NP (2006) Integration of
plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal
signals. Science 311:9194
Amjad M, Akhtar J, Anwar-ul-Haq M, Yang A, Akhtar SC, Jacobsen
E (2014) Integrating role of ethylene and ABA in tomato plants
adaptation to salt stress. Sci Hortic 172:109116
Anuradha S, Rao SSR (2001) Effect of brassinosteroids on salinity
stress induced inhibition of seed germination and seedling
growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul
33:151153
Azooz MM (2009) Salt stress mitigation by seed priming with
salicylic acid in two faba bean genotypes differing in salt
tolerance. Int J Agric Biol 11:343350
Barciszewski J, Siboska G, Rattan SIS, Clark BFC (2000) Occurrence, biosynthesis and properties of kinetin (N6-furfuryladenine). Plant Growth Regul 32:257265
Bastam N, Baninasab B, Ghobadi C (2013) Improving salt tolerance
by exogenous application of salicylic acid in seedlings of
pistachio. Plant Growth Regul 69:275284
123
123
123
123