Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
Recoded_CandidateProfile *
Highest Educational
143
100.0%
.0%
143
100.0%
Qualification
Disagree
Count
% within
Recoded_CandidateProfile
Agree
Count
% within
Recoded_CandidateProfile
Total
Count
% within
Recoded_CandidateProfile
Post Graduate
Total
25
28
89.3%
10.7%
100.0%
76
39
115
66.1%
33.9%
100.0%
101
42
143
70.6%
29.4%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
sided)
sided)
sided)
df
Pearson Chi-Square
5.842a
.016
Continuity Correctionb
4.777
.029
Likelihood Ratio
6.782
.009
5.801
N of Valid Cases
.016
Point Probability
.019
.011
.013
.011
.019
.011
.019
.011
143
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.22.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. The standardized statistic is 2.409.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Approx. Sig.
Exact Sig.
Phi
.202
.016
.019
Cramer's V
.202
.016
.019
Contingency Coefficient
.198
.016
.019
143
From the above crosstab, we can see that the significant value of chi square is less
than 0.05 so we can reject the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis might
be true. We can infer that most of the voters with a post-graduation degree agrees
that the candidates profile and his past performance are important factors while
taking a decision to vote for any specific candidate.
.009
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
Recoded_Transparency *
Highest Educational
143
100.0%
.0%
143
100.0%
Qualification
Disagree
Count
% within
Recoded_Transparency
Agree
Count
% within
Recoded_Transparency
Total
Count
% within
Recoded_Transparency
Post Graduate
Total
41
49
83.7%
16.3%
100.0%
60
34
94
63.8%
36.2%
100.0%
101
42
143
70.6%
29.4%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
sided)
sided)
sided)
df
Pearson Chi-Square
6.114a
.013
Continuity Correctionb
5.195
.023
Likelihood Ratio
6.515
.011
6.071
N of Valid Cases
.014
Point Probability
.020
.010
.013
.010
.020
.010
.020
.010
143
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.39.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. The standardized statistic is 2.464.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Approx. Sig.
Exact Sig.
Phi
.207
.013
.020
Cramer's V
.207
.013
.020
Contingency Coefficient
.202
.013
.020
143
Again, here we see that the chi-square value is less than 0.05 so we can reject the
null hypothesis. So the alternate hypothesis might be true. From the above data we
can see that most of the voters with a post graduate degree consider transparency
as an important factor while the voters without a post-graduate degree doesnt
consider transparency as an important factor.
.007
Missing
Percent
Total
Percent
Percent
Recoded_PMCandidate *
Highest Educational
143
100.0%
.0%
143
100.0%
Qualification
Disagree
Count
% within
Recoded_PMCandidate
Agree
Count
% within
Recoded_PMCandidate
Total
Count
% within
Recoded_PMCandidate
Post Graduate
Total
35
42
83.3%
16.7%
100.0%
66
35
101
65.3%
34.7%
100.0%
101
42
143
70.6%
29.4%
100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value
sided)
sided)
sided)
df
Pearson Chi-Square
4.626a
.031
Continuity Correctionb
3.800
.051
Likelihood Ratio
4.962
.026
4.594
N of Valid Cases
.032
Point Probability
.043
.023
.043
.023
.043
.023
.043
.023
143
a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.34.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. The standardized statistic is 2.143.
Symmetric Measures
Value
Nominal by Nominal
N of Valid Cases
Approx. Sig.
Exact Sig.
Phi
.180
.031
.043
Cramer's V
.180
.031
.043
Contingency Coefficient
.177
.031
.043
143
In this case also, the chi-square value is significant so we can reject the null
hypothesis, and alternative hypothesis might be true. We can infer from the data
that though a majority of both graduate and post-graduate believe that the PM/CM
candidate will affect the voting decision, however, a much larger percentage of
post-graduate believe this is a very important factor while deciding to vote.
.016
We did similar crosstab analysis for all the other factors with education qualification
of voters, however, for all the other hypothesis, the value of chi-square was not
significant and the null hypothesis was true. All those crosstab outputs SPSS are
shared in a separate file