Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Version 4.0
A Grain Size Distribution and Statistics Package for the Analysis of
Unconsolidated Sediments by Sieving or Laser Granulometer
Developed by Simon Blott
Surface Processes and Modern Environments Research Group
Department of Geology
Royal Holloway
University of London
Egham
Surrey TW20 0EX
E-mail: s.blott@gl.rhul.ac.uk
Tel/Fax: +44 (0)1784 414168
The development of this program was inspired by Dave Thornley and John Jack at the Postgraduate
Research Institute for Sedimentology at the University of Reading, UK, and the Department of Geology at
Royal Holloway University of London, UK. It is provided in Microsoft Excel format to allow both spreadsheet
and graphical output. The program is best suited to analyse data obtained from sieve or laser granulometer
analysis. The user is required to input the mass or percentage of sediment retained on sieves spaced at
any intervals, or the percentage of sediment detected in each bin of a Laser Granulometer. The following
sample statistics are then calculated using the Method of Moments in Microsoft Visual Basic programming
language: mean, mode(s), sorting (standard deviation), skewness, kurtosis, D 10, D50, D90, D90/D10, D90-D10,
D75/D25 and D75-D25. Grain size parameters are calculated arithmetically and geometrically (in microns) and
logarithmically (using the phi scale) (Krumbein and Pettijohn, 1938 1; Table 1). Linear interpolation is also
used to calculate statistical parameters by the Folk and Ward (1957)2 graphical method and derive physical
descriptions (such as very coarse sand and moderately sorted). The program also provides a physical
description of the textural group which the sample belongs to and the sediment name (such as fine gravelly
coarse sand) after Folk (1954)3. Also included is a table giving the percentage of grains falling into each
size fraction, modified from Udden (1914)4 and Wentworth (1922)5 (see Table 2). In terms of graphical
output, the program provides graphs of the grain size distribution and cumulative distribution of the data in
both metric and phi units, and displays the sample grain size on triangular diagrams. Samples may be
analysed singularly, or up to 250 samples may be analysed together.
The program is ideal for the rapid analysis of sieve data and is freely available from the author at the
above address. Please note that the copyright for the program is held by author, and any distribution or use
of the program should be acknowledged to him.
S. Blott
October 2000
Krumbein, W.C. and Pettijohn, F.J. (1938) Manual of Sedimentary Petrography. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
Folk, R.L. and Ward, W.C. (1957) Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary
Petrology, 27, 3-26.
3
Folk, R.L. (1954) The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary-rock nomenclature. Journal of Geology,
62, 344-359.
4
Udden, J.A. (1914) Mechanical composition of clastic sediments. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 25, 655-744.
Wentworth, C.K. (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology, 30, 377-392.
4. If you require a Summary Statistics printout for each sample, select a tick in the option box.
5. Click the "Calculate Statistics" button and wait for the program to finish running (this may take several
minutes). GRADISTAT will give a warning if it detects a sample whose combined weight is greater than the
given sample weight. Click "OK" when prompted on the dialog boxes.
6. The resulting statistics for all samples are summarised on the "Multiple Sample Statistics" sheet. The
data for each sample included in the analysis are also shown on triangular diagrams on the "Gravel Sand
Mud" and "Sand Silt Clay" sheets. Cumulative and distribution plots will show the results for the last sample
in the analysis. If graphical plots for other samples are required, use separate single sample analyses
(above).
Unanalysed Sediment
Occasionally, samples may contain sediment in a size fraction of unspecified size, such as material retained
in the pan after sieving. Ideally, the whole size range in a sample should be analysed, and this may require
further analysis of sediment remaining in the pan after sieving. The larger the quantity of sediment
remaining in the pan, the less accurate the calculation of grain size statistics, with statistics calculated by
the Method of Moments being most susceptible. Errors in Folk and Ward parameters become significant
only when more than 5% of the sample is undetermined. If the sample contains sediment in the pan the
user should do one of the following:
1. Enter the weight or percentage of sample in the pan with a class size of zero (or leave the class size
blank). GRADISTAT calculates the statistics assuming all sediment in the pan is larger than 10 (1 m).
The grain size distribution graphs do not however plot the quantity of sediment in the pan.
2. Enter the weight or percentage of sample in the pan with a class size which the user considers to be the
lower size limit of sediment in the pan. GRADISTAT calculates the statistics assuming all sediment in the
pan is larger than this value and plots this quantity on the grain size distribution graphs.
The above two options are recommended where there is less than 1% of the sample remaining in the pan.
3. Do not enter the quantity of sediment in the pan at all. GRADISTAT calculates the statistics ignoring the
sediment in the pan as if it were not present in the sample. This is recommended where there is more than
1% of the sample remaining in the pan.
Samples containing more than 5% of sediment in the pan should ideally be analysed using a different
technique, such as sedimentation or laser granulometry. Great care must however be taken when merging
data obtained by different methods.
Graph Scales
The size scale used in graphical plots is dependent upon the range of sizes specified on the sample input
sheets: the first and last values provide the extreme values on the graphs. While one size class larger than
the largest particles in the sample should be entered, other size classes outside the grain size range of the
sample have no influence on the statistical calculations. These classes may be deleted to narrow the size
scale on graphs. Note that unused size classes within the size range of the sample should also be deleted,
otherwise GRADISTAT assumes that zero sample weight was present in those size classes.
Copyright Simon Blott (2000)
x a =
Standard Deviation
fmm
100
Skewness
f ( mmx a )2
a =
100
Sk a =
f ( mm
x a )3
100 3
Kurtosis
f ( m m
100
Ka =
Standard Deviation
Skewness
Kurtosi
3
2
f ln m m
f ( ln m mln { x g )
f ( ln
f
(
ln
m
ln
{
x
)
m
g
x g = exp
Skg =
Kg =
=
exp
g
100
100 ln 3
100 ln
100
g
Sorting (g)
Very well sorted
Well sorted
Moderately well sorted
Moderately sorted
Poorly sorted
Very poorly sorted
Extremely poorly sorted
Skewness (Skg)
< 1.27
1.27 1.41
1.41 1.62
1.62 2.00
2.00 4.00
4.00 16.00
> 16.00
Kurtosis (
< -1.30
1.30 -0.43
0.43 +0.43
+
0.43 +1.30
> +1.30
-
Very platykurtic
Platykurtic
Mesokurtic
Leptokurtic
Very leptokurtic
x f =
Standard Deviation
S fmf
100
f ( m x )3
Sk =
100 3
Sf ( mf x f )2
sf =
100
Sorting ()
Very well sorted
Well sorted
Moderately well sorted
Moderately sorted
Skewness
K =
Skewness (Sk)
< 0.35
0.35 0.50
0.50 0.70
0.70 1.00
Kurtosis
> +1.30
0.43 +1.30
0.43 +0.43
0.43 -1.30
f ( m
100
Kurtosis (
Very platykurtic
Platykurtic
Mesokurtic
Leptokurtic
M Z=
16 +50 + 84
Standard Deviation
I=
8416 955
+
Skewness
Sk I =
16 + 842 50
Kurtosis
K G=
95
M Z=
Standard Deviation
Skewness
16 +50 + 84
16 955
I = 84
+
3
4
6.6
Sk I =
16 + 842 50
+
Sorting (I)
Very well sorted
Well sorted
Moderately well sorted
Moderately sorted
Poorly sorted
Very poorly sorted
Extremely poorly sorted
Kurtosis
2 ( 8416 )
5 + 952 50
K G=
2 . 44 (
2 ( 95 5 )
Skewness (SkI)
< 0.35
0.35 0.50
0.50 0.70
0.70 1.00
1.00 2.00
2.00 4.00
> 4.00
95
Kurtosis (
0.3 to +1.0
0.1 to +0.3
+
0.1 to -0.1
0.1 to -0.3
0.3 to -1.0
+
+
Very platykurtic
Platykurtic
Mesokurtic
Leptokurtic
Very leptokurtic
Extremely
leptokurtic
M G=exp
Standard Deviation
G =exp
ln P16 ln P84 ln P5 ln
+
4
6 .6
Skewness
Sk G=
Kurtosis
Sorting (G)
Very well sorted
Table 2.
K G=
ln P5 ln P 95
2 . 44 ( ln P25ln P 75)
Skewness (SkG)
< 1.27
Kurtosis (
0.3 to -1.0
Very platykurtic
phi
Grain Size
mm
-10
1024
-9
512
-8
256
-7
128
-6
64
Descriptive term
Very Large
Large
Medium
Small
Very small
- 29 -
Very coarse
-5
32
Boulder
phi
mm
-10
1024
-9
512
-8
256
-7
128
-6
64
-5
32
-4
16
-3
-2
-1
0
1
1
microns
500
250
125
63
31
16
Very Large
Large
Medium
Boulder
Small
Very small
Very coarse
Coarse
Medium
Gravel
Fine
Very fine
Very coarse
Coarse
Medium
Sand
Fine
Very fine
Very coarse
Coarse
Medium
Fine
Very fine
Silt
at the Postgraduate
tment of Geology at
ow both spreadsheet
r laser granulometer
on sieves spaced at
eter. The following
Basic programming
D90, D90/D10, D90-D10,
ally (in microns) and
interpolation is also
and derive physical
provides a physical
uch as fine gravelly
ains falling into each
n terms of graphical
bution of the data in
. Samples may be
w York.
Journal of Sedimentary
392.
ludes a distribution
stics page. The data
ay" sheets. Further
n box.
n box.
as material retained
and this may require
uantity of sediment
atistics calculated by
s become significant
ment in the pan the
considers to be the
g all sediment in the
ed using a different
taken when merging
in size parameters.
of each class interval in metric (
metric or phi units respectively, at the
ness
Kurtosis
( mm
x a )3
0 3
Ka =
f ( m mx a )4
100 4
a
ewness
Kurtosis
3
( ln m mln { x g )
f ( ln mmln {
xg)
Kg =
0 ln 3
100 ln 4
g
Kurtosis (
< -1.30
.30 -0.43
43 +0.43
43 +1.30
> +1.30
Very platykurtic
Platykurtic
Mesokurtic
Leptokurtic
Very leptokurtic
ness
( m x )3
0 3
> +1.30
43 +1.30
43 +0.43
.43 -1.30
Kurtosis
f ( mx )4
K =
100 4
Kurtosis (
Very platykurtic
Platykurtic
Mesokurtic
Leptokurtic
ness
+ 842 50
Kurtosis
K G=
95 5
ness
Kurtosis
+ 842 50
8416 )
+ 952 50
K G=
95 5
2 . 44 ( 7525 )
( 95 5 )
Kurtosis (
0.3 to +1.0
0.1 to +0.3
+
0.1 to -0.1
0.1 to -0.3
0.3 to -1.0
Very platykurtic
Platykurtic
Mesokurtic
Leptokurtic
Very leptokurtic
Extremely
leptokurtic
Standard Deviation
exp
K G=
ln P5 ln P 95
2 . 44 ( ln P25ln P 75)
Kurtosis (
0.3 to -1.0
Very platykurtic
term
Boulder
Boulder
Gravel
Sand
Silt
Aperture
(microns)
90000
63000
45000
31500
22400
16000
11200
8000
5600
4000
2800
2000
1400
1000
710
500
355
250
180
125
90
63
(optional)
Class Weight
Retained (g or %)
5.94
5.61
8.65
11.45
18.56
21.85
14.91
4.23
1.24
5.65
0.33
1.57
Enter your data in the columns below, and then click the "Ca
Statistics" button. See the "Information" sheet for more info
Auto. add
apertures
at:
SAMPLE STATISTICS
SAMPLE IDENTITY:
m
MODE 1:
MODE 2:
MODE 3:
D10:
MEDIAN or D50:
D90:
(D90 / D10):
(D90 - D10):
(D75 / D25):
(D75 - D25):
427.5
2400.0
107.5
197.7
502.0
1545.5
7.819
1347.8
2.615
535.1
MEAN ( x ):
SORTING ():
SKEWNESS (Sk):
KURTOSIS (K):
1.247
-1.243
3.237
-0.628
0.994
2.339
-3.724
2.967
7.707
1.387
METHOD OF MOMENTS
Arithmetic Geometric Logarithmic
m
m
708.4
501.0
0.997
579.2
2.502
1.323
1.610
-1.349
1.349
5.033
7.976
7.976
m
541.2
0.886
Coarse Sand
2.272
1.184
Poorly Sorted
0.059
-0.059
Symmetrical
1.268
1.268
Leptokurtic
3.0000
1.0000
-3.0000
-5.0000
-7.0000
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
100
1000
Particle Diameter (m)
10000
100000
30.0%
36.8%
5.5%
6.0%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
METHOD
Description
Coarse Sand
Poorly Sorted
Symmetrical
Leptokurtic
.0000
-7.0000
100000
Auto. add
apertures
at:
Print summary sheets for each sample?
Aperture
Class Weight Retained (g or %) in Different Samples
(microns)
Sample Identity:
Analyst:
Date:
Initial Sample Weight:
90000
63000
45000
31500
22400
16000
11200
8000
5600
4000
2800
2000
1400
1000
710
500
355
250
180
125
90
63
SAMPLE STATISTICS
METHOD OF
MOMENTS
Arithmetic (m)
METHOD OF
MOMENTS
Geometric (m)
METHOD OF
MOMENTS
Logarithmic ()
FOLK AND
WARD METHOD
(m)
FOLK AND
WARD METHOD
()
FOLK AND
WARD METHOD
(Description)
Triangular Diagram
Gravel: 5.9%
Sand: 92.5%
Mud: 1.6%
Gravel
SAMPLE
IDENTITY:
TEXTURAL Gravelly Sand
GROUP:
SEDIMENT NAME: Very Fine Gravelly Medium
Sand
Gravel
80%
Gravel %
Muddy Gravel
Muddy
Sandy
Gravel
Medium 36.8%
Sand: 5.5%
Fine Sand:
Very Fine 6.0%
Sand:
Very Coarse
Silt: 0.3%
Coarse Silt: 0.3%
Medium Silt: 0.3%
30%
Gravelly
Sand
5%
Trace
Mud
Slightly
Gravelly
Mud
Mud
Slightly Gravelly
Sandy Mud
1:9
Sand
Muddy Sand
1:1
Sand:Mud Ratio
Clay: 0.3%
Slightly
Gravelly
Sand
Slightly Gravelly
Muddy Sand
Sandy Mud
9:1
Sand
Triangular Diagram
Sand
SAMPLE
IDENTITY:
TEXTURAL Sand
GROUP:
IGNORING
GRAVEL
FRACTION
Gravel: 5.9%
Sand: 92.5%
Mud: 1.6%
NOTE
Gravel is also
present in
this sample
Sand
90%
Muddy Sand
Silty Sand
Sand %
Medium 36.8%
Sand: 5.5%
Fine Sand:
Very Fine 6.0%
Sand:
Very Coarse
Silt: 0.3%
50%
Sandy Mud
Sandy Silt
10%
Mud
Clay
Clay
1:2
Silt
2:1
Silt:Clay Ratio
Silt
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-7.0000
-5.0000
-3.0000
-1.0000
Particle diameter (f)
1.0000
3.0000
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
-2.000
-1.000
0.000
1.000
Particle diameter2.000
(f)
3.000
4.000
5.000
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
10.0
100.0
1000.0
Particle diameter (mm)
10000.0
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
10
100
1000
Particle diameter (mm)
10000
ARITHMETIC
GEOMETIC
f(m-M)2
f(m-M)3
f(m-M)4
log m
f log m
f(logm-logM)2
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
17006356.12548
5519173.29167
2091699.42591
246066.63818
198335.94842
1723849.79156
2455785.52938
1030181.60648
383349.49616
2040964.80469
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
###
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
###
###
###
5290080072.50615
2119540693.43883
###
###
###
###
###
4.877
4.726
4.576
4.424
4.277
4.127
3.976
3.826
3.675
3.525
3.374
3.224
3.073
2.926
2.775
2.625
2.474
2.327
2.176
2.026
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20.05214451
18.09332494
26.59530141
33.48594073
51.50412003
57.34992102
36.88229544
9.8464677
2.699703013
11.45023099
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
2.70177
1.53960
1.20550
0.58350
0.10516
0.12371
0.75978
0.58955
0.34032
2.56997
131824.15767
718635.08190
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
###
###
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
###
###
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
1.877
0.895
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
0.61965103
1.405099415
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
0.22366
5.11948
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
D OF MOMENTS
f(logm-logM)3 f(logm-logM)4
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
1.82167
0.80634
0.44992
0.13175
0.00792
-0.00931
-0.17153
-0.22004
-0.17824
-1.73284
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
1.22827
0.42231
0.16792
0.02975
0.00060
0.00070
0.03872
0.08213
0.09335
1.16840
-0.18408
-9.24231
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
0.15151
16.68535
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502
Err:502