Professional Documents
Culture Documents
that a set of factual circumstances exist that would lead a reasonable officer
to have a reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is occurring.
Application
The application of law is that upon the traffic stop, Officer Trevizo
believed that there was reasonable cause to remove Johnson from the
vehicle to ask further questions. Given that Johnson had a police scanner
hidden in his jacket and what citizens used the devices for, and that he was a
convicted criminal just recently out of prison, she was within the law to frisk
Johnson after he exited the vehicle. Upon discovery of the concealed
weapon, Johnson began to struggle, and Officer Trevizo then cuffed him. A
charge of charge of possession of a weapon by a prohibited possessor was
lawful.
Conclusion
Johnson was convicted of possession of a weapon by a prohibited
possessor. An Arizona Court of Appeals panel reversed the decision. It
recognized that Johnson was lawfully seized when the vehicle was stopped,
but the court nevertheless concluded that prior to the frisk the detention had
"evolved into a separate, consensual encounter stemming from an unrelated
investigation by Trevizo of Johnson's possible gang affiliation," id., at 64, 170
P.3d, at 673. Absent "reason to believe Johnson was involved in criminal
activity," the Arizona appeals court held, Trevizo "had no right to pat him
down for weapons, even if she had reason to suspect he was armed and
dangerous."
Opinion
I agree with the initial judgment against Johnson, but disagree with the
reversed decision by the Court of Appeals. Given that Johnson had a prior
conviction of burglary, his association with a known local gang and that he
was carrying a device used to evade police to conduct illegal activities, I
believe Officer Trevizo was conducting herself in a manner to protect the
citizens of her jurisdiction.
Works Cited