Professional Documents
Culture Documents
can improve the quality of healthcare systems. SCM can aid in the creation of
better facilities for product design research. Moreover, SCM improves forward and
backward integration. A positive level of strategic partnership with suppliers,
coupled with an efficient ordering system and integrated inventory management
can enhance forward integration; a good level of communication and interaction
with patients greatly helps with backward integration. Having high levels of forward
and backward integration then improves the overall quality management of
hospitals.
However, improving SCM will inevitably increase costs. Detlef et al (2011) [10]
discusses a transformative hospital supply chain that balances cost with quality
healthcare. The hospital supply chain undergoes three stages of maturity. At the
foundational level, the hospital uses a segmented approach and delivers each
departments need, making sure that supplies are available. After this level, an
optimization model is adopted. A close relationship and collaboration between
different hospital departments is strived for so that costs can be reduced through
economies of scale. Also, the outsourcing of non-core SCM functions and
standardisation increases efficiency. The last stage of maturity, the transformation
model, moderates cost and the level of satisfaction among patients. To achieve
the transformation mode, collaborative governance, automated and integrated IT
systems and streamlined processes such as procurement and materials
management are necessary elements.
There are several internal inventory management policies that companies have
used to improve SCM. Gebicki et al (2013) [3] explores the medication inventory
policies in hospitals. A bullwhip effect the increase in demand variability when
moving upstream in supply chain was identified. Information sharing, channel
alignment and operational efficiency were proposed to handle the bullwhip effect.
4 policies were analysed. The first policy adopts a classical method to determine
reorder points and par levels. The second policy, similar to the first, is modified
with reorders made based on the criticality of the drug. The third policy determines
if a drug should be placed in a dispensing machine. Similar to the third policy, the
fourth policy includes the ordering of drugs for the main pharmacy as well. Claudia
et al (2014) [4] suggests the point-of-use hybrid inventory policy. This policy is a