Professional Documents
Culture Documents
e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 2 Ver. IV (Mar - Apr. 2015), PP 24-32
www.iosrjournals.org
the unit disc U z : z 1 . We obtain coefficient estimate, distortion and closure theorems, radii
of close-to-convexity and
Keywords and phrases: multivalent function, distortion theorems, radius theorems, - neighborhood.
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 30C45.
I.
Let AP be the class of functions analytic in the open unit disc U z : z 1 of the form
f z z p an p z n p
and let A1 A.
Let
(1.1)
n 1
f U g U .
f g z z p an pbn p z n p .
n 1
if it satisfies
f z
Re p 1
z U ,
z
for some 0 p . We denote by S P ( ) the subclass of AP consisting of functions which are pvalently starlike of order in U .
,
Recently, M.K. Aouf et. al. [1] introduced the operator , p : Ap Ap as follows:
p 1 1 z t
f z
1
p
z p 0 z
,
,p
zp
p 1
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
t 1 f (t) dt
p n
n p
an p z
1
n 1
www.iosrjournals.org
(1.2)
24 | Page
p; 1; ; p ; z U .
From (1.2), it is easy to verify that
Remark:1.1. If we let
and Owa [2] and
operator
(1.3)
1 , then this operator ,,p reduces to the operator introduced and studied by Liu
Q,1 Q introduced and studied by Jung et.al.[3]. For other choices of and then the
,,p reduces to the familiar other well- known integral operators introduced and discussed by various
Let
f z z p an p z n p
p 1 .
(1.4)
n 1
Motivated by the earlier investigations of Aouf [8], Darwish and Aouf [9], Magesh et. al. [10], Guney, H.O
and Sumer Eker.S [11] and Mahzoon [12], we investigate, in the present paper, the various properties and
characteristics of analytic p-valent functions belonging to the subclass
Definition: 1.1. A function
SP , , , A, B, .
zF z
F z
p pB A B p
1 Bz
(1.5)
where
zF z
p
F z
zF z
pB A B p B
F z
1,
(1.6)
II.
Coefficient Estimates
inequality:
n, , , n 1 B A B p a
n 1
A B p 1 (p 1) ,
p 1 p n
1 n p 1
p p n 1
0 p, 1 B A 1, 1 B 0 and 0 1.
where
n, , ,
n p
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
(2.1)
(2.2)
25 | Page
f z z p
f z given by
p 1 A B p 1 p 1 p1
z .
p 1 B A B p 1 p
z 1 . Then we obtain
Proof: Assume that the inequality (2.1) holds true and let
zF z
p
F z
zF z
pB A B p B
F z
n, , , n a
n p
n 1
zn
A B p 1 (p 1) n, , , nB A B p an p z n
n 1
A B p 1 (p 1)
by hypothesis. Hence, by the maximum modulus theorem, we have
assume that
f SP , , , A, B, , . Conversely,
zF z
pB A B p B
F z
Since
n, , , n a
n p
n 1
zn
1
A B p 1 (p 1) n, , , nB A B p an p z
n 1
n, , , n an p z n
n 1
Re
1.
n
A B p 1 (p 1) n, , , nB A B p an p z
n 1
Choosing values of z on the real axis and letting z 1 through real values, we obtain
n, , , n 1 B A B p a
n p
n 1
A B p 1 (p 1) .
A B p 1 (p 1)
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
for n 1 . Equality holds for the function f z of the form
an p
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
26 | Page
f z z p
A B p 1 p 1
z n p .
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
III.
rp
(2.3)
Distortion Bounds
p 1 A B p 1 p 1 p1
r f z
p 1 B A B p 1 p
p 1 A B p 1 p 1
rp
p 1 B A B p 1 p
(3.1)
r p 1
p 1 B A B p 1 p
an p
p 1
n 1
n, , , n 1 B A B p a
n p
n 1
which is equivalent to
a
n 1
n p
A B p 1 (p 1)
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1)
p 1 B A B p 1 p
(3.2)
f z z z
p
p 1
a
n 1
n p
r p r p 1 an p
n 1
rp
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) r p 1.
p 1 B A B p 1 p
f z r p
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) r p1.
p 1 B A B p 1 p
Similarly,
p r p 1
p 1 A B p 1 p 1 p 1
p 1 B A B p 1 p
p r p 1
r p f z
(3.3)
p 1 A B p 1 p 1 p 1
p 1 B A B p 1 p
rp
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
27 | Page
p 1 B A B p 1 p
n p an p
p 1 p 1
n 1
n, , , n 1 B A B p a
n p
n 1
which is equivalent to
n p a
n p
n 1
A B p 1 (p 1)
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) p 1
p 1 B A B p 1 p
(3.4)
f z p z
p 1
n p a
n p
n 1
p r p 1 r p n p an p
n 1
p r p 1
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) p 1 r p .
p 1 B A B p 1 p
f z p r p 1
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) p 1 r p .
p 1 B A B p 1 p
Similarly,
IV.
Closure Theorems
f j z z p an p , j z n p
n p, j
n 1
be in the class
(4.1)
h z cj f j z
j 1
(4.2)
SP , , , A, B, , , where
m
c
j 1
1.
(4.3)
h z , we can write
h z z p c j an p , j z n p .
n 1 j 1
n, , , n 1 B A B p a
n p , j
n 1
(4.4)
A B p 1 (p 1) ,
(4.5)
for every j 1, 2,3,, m, , by virtue of Theorem 2.1. Consequently, with the aid of (4.5) we can see that
n 1
j 1
n, , , n 1 B A B p c j an p , j
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
28 | Page
c j n, , , n 1 B A B p an p , j
j 1
n 1
m
c j A B p 1 (p 1) A B p 1 (p 1)
j 1
fp z z p
(4.6)
and
A B p 1 p 1
z n p
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
for 1 B A 1, 1 B 0, 0 p and n, , , is defined by (2.2). Then f z
f z n p f n p z
n 0
n p
(4.7)
is in the
(4.8)
and
n 0
n p
1.
(4.9)
A B p 1 p 1
n p z n p
n
1
B
p
n
,
n 1
f z n p f n p z z p
n 0
(4.10)
Then we get
n, , , n 1 B A B p
n 1
A B p 1 p 1
n p
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
A B p 1 p 1 .
2.1, we have
an p
Next, setting
A B p 1 (p 1)
.
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
n p
an p
A B p 1 (p 1)
and
p 1 n p ,
n 1
we have the representation (4.8). This completes the proof of the theorem.
V.
In this section, we prove certain relationship for functions belonging to the class
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
29 | Page
SP , , , , A, B, , .
Following the works of Goodman [13], Ruschweyh [14] and Altintas et. al. [15, 16], we define the
neighborhood of a function
n,
f Tp n by
N n, f g Tp n : g z z p bn p z n p and
n 1
p
In particular, for the function e z z p
n p a
n p
n 1
bn p .
(5.1)
(5.2)
N n, e g Tp n : g z z p bn p z n p and n p bn p .
n 1
n 1
exists a function
h SP , , , A, B, , such that
f z
h z
1 p
z U , 0 p .
(5.3)
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) p 1 .
p 1 B A B p 1 p
SP , , , A, B, , Nn, e .
Then
p 1
n 1
n, , , n 1 B A B p a
n p
n 1
a
n 1
n p
(5.4)
(5.5)
A B p 1 (p 1) .
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1)
p 1 B A B p 1 p
(5.6)
p 1 B A B p 1 p
an p A B p 1 (p 1) ,
p 1
n 1
p 1 p 1 B A B p 1 p
an p p 1 A B p 1 (p 1).
p 1
n 1
Hence,
n p a
n 1
n p
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) p 1 ,
p 1 B A B p 1 p
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
30 | Page
p 1
(5.7)
p 1 B A B p 1 p
p 1 B A B p 1 p p 1 A B p 1 (p 1)
Nn, h SP , , , , A, B, , .
Then
(5.8)
n p a
n p
n 1
bn p
a
n 1
n p
bn p
.
p 1
(5.9)
Next, since
b
n 1
n p
p 1 A B p 1 (p 1) .
p 1 B A B p 1 p
(5.10)
Using (5.9), (5.10) together with (5.3), we get the required assertion.
VI.
Theorem: 6.1. Let
0 p
in
z R1 , where
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
R1 inf
n
A B p 1 (p 1)
p n
n p
(6.1)
z R2 , where
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
R2 inf
n
A B p 1 (p 1)
p n
n p
(6.2)
z R3 , where
n 1 B A B p n, , ,
R3 inf
n
A B p 1 (p 1)
n
p p
.
n
p
n
(6.3)
In order to establish the required results in Theorems 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3, it is sufficient to show that
f (z)
p p
z p 1
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
for
z R1 ,
www.iosrjournals.org
31 | Page
zf (z)
p p
f (z)
for
zf (z)
1 f (z) p p
z R2 and
for
z R3 ,
respectively.
Remark 6.1: The results in Theorems 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3 are sharp with the extremal function f given by (2.3).
Furthermore, taking 0 in Theorems 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3, we obtain radius of close-to-convexity, starlikeness
and convexity respectively.
References
[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5].
[6].
[7].
[8].
[9].
[10].
[11].
[12].
[13].
[14].
[15].
[16].
Aouf M. K., El-Ashwah and Ahmed M Abd Eltawab, On certain subclass of p-valent functions Journal of classical Analyis, 4,
1(2014), 63 - 68.
Liu, Jin-Lin; Owa, Shigeyoshi. Properties of certain integral operator. Int. J. Math. Sci. 3 (2004), no. 1, 69 - 75.
Jung, Il Bong; Kim, Yong Chan; Srivastava, H. M. The Hardy space of analytic functions associated with certain one-parameter
families of integral operators. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 176 (1993), no. 1, 138 - 147.
Bernardi, S. D. Convex and starlike univalent functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 135, 1969, 429 - 446.
Libera, R. J. Some classes of regular univalent functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 1965, 755 - 758.
Livingston, A. E. On the radius of univalence of certain analytic functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17, 1966, 352 - 357.
Saitoh, Hitoshi; Owa, Shigeyoshi; Sekine, Tadayuki; Nunokawa, Mamoru; Yamakawa, Rikuo. An application of a certain integral
operator. Appl. Math. Lett. 5 (1992), no. 2, 21 - 24.
Aouf, M. K. On certain subclasses of multivalent functions with negative coefficients defined by using a differential operator. Bull.
Inst. Math. Acad. Sin. (N.S.) 5 (2010), no. 2, 181 - 200.
Darwish, Hanan E.; Aouf, M. K. Neighborhoods of certain subclasses of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Bull. Korean
Math. Soc. 48 (2011), no. 4, 689 - 695.
Magesh, N.; Mayilvaganan, S.; Mohanapriya, L. Certain subclasses of multivalent functions associated with fractional calculus
operator. Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 7 (2012), no. 21-24, 1113 - 1123.
Guney, H. O.; Sumer Eker, S. On a certain class of p-valent functions with negative coefficients. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl.
Math. 6 (2005), no. 4, Article 97, 10 pp.
Mahzoon, H. Some properties of subclasses of P-valent functions defined by differential subordination. Acta. Univ. Apulensis
Math. Inform. No. 36 (2013), 143 - 54.
Goodman, A. W. Univalent functions and nonanalytic curves. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 8 (1957), 598 - 601.
Ruscheweyh, Stephan. Neighborhoods of univalent functions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81 (1981), no. 4, 521 - 527.
Altintas,, O.; Ozkan, O.; Srivastava, H. M. Neighborhoods of a class of analytic functions with negative coefficients. Appl. Math.
Lett. 13 (2000), no. 3, 63 - 67.
Altintas,, O.; Ozkan, O.; Srivastava, H. M. Neighborhoods of a certain family of multivalent functions with negative coefficients.
Comput. Math. Appl. 47 (2004), no. 10 -11, 1667 - 1672.
DOI: 10.9790/5728-11242432
www.iosrjournals.org
32 | Page