Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1.1 SPRAYER HISTORY
In 1887 First non manpowered sprayer, horse-drawn traction sprayer are
used. Then by 1900 Gasoline engines are used, 1911 Pressure regulator and air
chamber for smooth and continuous spray, 1944 Attachments for water injection &
low Pressure, low volume sprayers.
Backpack
Foot
Garden
Hand compression
Power
Stirrup
Self-propelled crop sprayer
Trailed crop sprayer
Rexine
Hose
Pu-Nipple
1.3 NYLON
Nylon is a generic designation for a family of synthetic polymers known
generically as aliphatic polyamides, first produced on February 28, 1935, by
Wallace Carothers at DuPont's research facility at the DuPont Experimental
Station. Nylon is one of the most commonly used polymers Key representatives
are nylon-6,6; nylon-6; nylon-6,9; nylon-6,10; nylon-6,12; nylon-11; nylon-12 and
nylon-4.
1.3.1 CHARACTERISTICS
High elongation
Excellent abrasion resistance
High resistance to insects, fungi, animals, as well as molds, mildew, rot and
many chemicals
Melts instead of burning
Good specific strength
1.3.2 APPLICATION
Clothes fabrics
Bridal veils
Package paper
Carpets
Musical strings
1.4 SPRING
A spring is defined as an elastic body, whose function is to distort when
loaded and to recover its original shape when the load is removed.
1.4.2.3 Load(P)
The force applied to a spring that causes a deflection.
5
1.4.2.4 Deflection
Motion of spring ends or legs under the application or removal of an external
load (P).
1.4.2.5 Wire Diameter (d)
The diameter of the wire that is wound into a helix.
1.4.2.6 Spring Index (C)
The ratio of mean coil diameter to wire diameter. A low index indicates a
tightly wound spring (a relatively large wire size wound around a relatively small
diameter mandrel giving a high rate).
1.5.2 APPLICATION
Power plants
Steam Boiler
Solar thermal
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Report of systems to meter, or inject, concentrated pesticides into the diluent
stream beganto appear in the research literature in the mid1970s (Hughes and frost,
1985). Vidrineetal. (1975) developed and tested a laboratory system which
demonstrated the feasibility of injecting concentrated pesticides .Problems noted
with this system included non-uniform pesticide application and transient
application errors resulting from changes in operating speed. Richard and
Ladd(1983) developed a field sprayer which included injection of pesticides at the
8
proper rate for variations in travel speed. The unit was reported to work wellin
field tests. Chietal. (1988) developed an electronic flow rate control system for
metering concentrated pesticides.Ghateandphatak(1991) developed and tested a
field sprayer which used compressed air to inject concentrated chemical into the
carrier stream. Kooetal (1987) found the time delay of concentrated pesticides
through injection sprayers to be significant,and proposed injection at the individual
nozzles as possible solution to shorten delays .Tomp kinsetal (1990) injected at
racer chemical into the diluents treatment three points on a booms prayerimmediately before and after the diluent pump,and at the individual nozzles.They
found that as the injection point was moved downstream, transient time was
reduced,
but
variations
in
chemical
concentration
between
nozzles.
based on travel speed and the desired theoretical application rate. The control
console, mounted at the operator's station, contained a microprocessor and
associated circuitry to monitor the radar ground speed sensor and to control the
speed of the injection pump motors as required. The console allowed the operator
to select sprayer boom widths, pump response parameters, and desired chemical
application rates. It also calculated and displayed application rate, groundspeed,
areas prayed, and volume of chemical used. In normal field operation, a power
take-off- (pto-) driven or engine-driven pump would be used in conjunction with a
pressure regulator to maintain a constant pressure in the spray boom, and therefore
a constant flowrate of the carrier. However, in these tests it was desirable to reduce
pressure variations that might be encountered with this type of system and to
provide easy and repeatable pressure adjustments. This was accomplished by
pressurizing the carrier (water) tank through an adjustable air regulator.
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
LITERATURE SURVEY
MATERIALS SELECTION
10
FABRICATION
COMPARE
DEMONSTRATON
ASSEMBLY
RESULT
PROCESS
CHAPTER 4
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
4.1 OVERVIEW
In our project we are using the components like nylon plate,
helical spring, one way valve, pu-nipple, rexine, hose, sprayer
tank, nozzle. In this sprayer we used two foot pedals made of
nylon plates in the shape of a persons foot. In between two
plates two helical compression springs are fixed in front and rear
end of plates A one way valve is fixed in front as suction and in
back as delivery purpose.The whole setup is covered by rexin or
leather. Two hoses are used to connect the tank and the valve
11
delivery valve,
Figure 4.1
4.3 ADVANTAGES
Its not compact for large scales,due to storage of pesticides in the container
CHAPTER 5
CONCLUSION
Thus we conclude that pedal sprayer can be used for future
in agricultural field, it can be easily handled by anyone, it is a
pollution free and reduces effort and also it can be bought for less
cost. In future high pressure air can be stored in the tank and two
outlet can be brought out for spraying.
14
CHAPTER 6
SCOPE OF PROJECT
The main scope of the project in the future is the usage in
the field of agriculture, painting purpose without using the fuel
and battery current. It is very useful for the farmers by simply
walking in the field and spraying the pesticide with required
velocity in the nozzle. Similarly the same operation is useful for
the painters
15
CHAPTER 7
REFERENCES
1. http://www.wikipedia.com
2. Beer F.P and Jhonston R, Mechanics of Materials
3. Popov E.P, Engineering Mechanics of Solids
4. Bhandari V.B Design of Machine Elements
5. Rajput R.K Thermal Engineering
16
APPENDIX
PHOTOGRAPHY
17
PEDAL
18
SPRAYER TANK
19
PEDAL SPRAYER
20