AUDIT

BDO

Confidential

ASSIGNMENT REPORT (AR1)

(SA1 & Below)
Name Wong Euwing
Position

Date of Appraisal
Audit Associate

Date Joined

Name of Senior
Industry

Tick where appropriate

Employee No

A1686

SBU / SSU

Audit Associate

Audit Group

Name of Manager

PLCs

Non PLCs

Client's Name

Special (Please specify)

Office
Client's Group Name

Other Assignments (Please specify)

Assignment Began
Assignment Ended
SECTION A Indicate the tasks assigned, noting special requirements.
Tick where appropriate

Auditor-in-Charge (AIC) ; please specify the company's name (if there are several companies involved)

or
Senior-in-Charge (SIC)
or
Balance Sheet ; please specify

PPE, Inventory costing verification, Debtors verification, Creditors verification

or
Income Statement ; please specify

or
Special Assignments ; please specify the tasks assigned
FRCP

SECTION B Indicate how this assignment has contributed to your technical and/or
personal and professional development.
Tick where appropriate

Comments

Technical Ability
Familiarity of MASB Standards
Analytical Review
Auditing Standards & Principles
Accounting Principles
Working Paper Presentations
Report Writing
Time Management Skills
Management Skills

Co-ordination and Coorperation (Team-Spirit)

Communication Skills

SECTION C Factors Affecting Performance (Completed by Appraisor Only)

NO

FACTORS

ACTUAL
RATING
(A)

WT
(B)

JOB KNOWLEDGE / TECHNICAL SKILLS

0.1 to 5.0

10

INITIATIVE

0.1 to 5.0

TIMELINESS AND SENSE OF URGENCY

0.1 to 5.0

10

INTERPERSONAL EFFECTIVENESS

0.1 to 5.0

TEAMWORK, CO-OPERATION AND ABILITY TO WORK WITH OTHERS

0.1 to 5.0

COMMUNICATION

0.1 to 5.0

SUBORDINATE MANAGEMENT (if applicable)

0.1 to 5.0

ORGANIZATION / PLANNING

0.1 to 5.0

PROBLEM SOLVING

0.1 to 5.0

10

DECISION MAKING

0.1 to 5.0

11

LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY

0.1 to 5.0

TOTAL WT SC

b (i)
b (ii)

MAXIMUM WT SC
MAXIMUM WT SC (excluding factor 7)

WT SC (C) = (A) x (B)

440
400

a over b (i) or (ii) x 100

TOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION C

0%

OVERALL APPRAISAL RATING DEFINITION

Below are the various ratings to be used when summing up an employee's overall performance :
Grade

Rating

Terms

85% and above

Outstanding

70% - 84%

Good

56% - 69%

Average

41% - 55%

Improvement Needed

Below 41%

Poor

SECTION D Career Development Review (Completed by Appraisor Only)

Identify strong points of the employee which have contributed to his/her success.

Identify the factors which may be hindering the employee.

Identify specific tasks or areas which need improvement.

Proposed action plan to improve performance indicated.

Where appropriate set dates to review developments / performance.

FINAL RATING / GRADE

Total score from Section C =

Grade =

APPROVALS

Superior's Signature
Date

Principal's/Partner's Signature
Date

Manager's Signature
Date

APPRAISEE'S COMMENTS

Appraisee's Signature
Date

PLAN / ACTION

APPRAISOR'S COMMENTS

Appraisor's Signature
Date

Terms =