INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMIT

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:
Bureae/Center/Service/ Division:

MFOs
BASIC EDUCATION SERVICES

ALZHEN N. BAKINO
Teacher-I
JUNE 2014-MARCH 2015
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

KRAs
1. Teaching Learning
Process

2. Student Outcomes

3. Diversity of Learners

4. Teamwork

5. Personal, Social, Professional Growth &

Development

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

Employee-Superior Agreement

The signature below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the per
Name of Employee:
Signature:
Date:

Strengths

Development Needs

IDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

ATION

Objectives

Timeline

Weight
per KRA

1. Prepared lesson plans of

activities
2. Facilitated learning through
functional lesson plans and
innovative teaching strategies
3. Monitored of the students ,
positive & motivating
environment.

JUNE 2014MARCH 2015

30%

1. Monitored, evaluated &

maintained student's
progress.
2. Conducted remediation /
enrichment programs.
3. Maintained updated student's school records

JUNE 2014MARCH 2015

20%

1. Addressed to the learning

needs of the learners
through activities and other
Multiple Intelligence
approach.
2. Provided activities suited to
the learners' abilitiy.
3. Selected Teaching methods
& objectives suitable to
learning ability of the
students.
4. Provided assistance to
teachers in improving their
competencies.

JUNE 2014MARCH 2015

15%

1. Worked constructively and

JUNE 2014-

15%

Performance Indicators
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timeliness)

collaboratively with colleagues to accomplish organizational goals & objectives.

2. Promoted collaboration &
removes barriers to teamwork & goal accomplishment.
3. Assisted to the needs of
colleagues in the field of
specialization.

MARCH 2015

1. Participated and attended

trainings, seminars & workshops (School Level, Division,
Regional, National)
2. Produced creative work for
school paper publication.

JUNE 2014MARCH 2015

10%

RATER

RATEE

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Results
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rating

rior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
ALZHEN N. BAKINO

Name of Superior:

DR. SALIHMATAL H. LAGBAS

Signature:
5/26/2015

Date:

5/26/2015

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
(Recommended
Developmental Intervention)

RATER

Timeline

RATEE

DR. SALIHMATAL H. LAGBAS

SHOOL PRINCIPAL-IV

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
Actual Result Rating

Score

OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Resources Needed

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
Name of Employee: LARYSON F. BAGUMBAY
Position: Teacher-I
Bureae/Center/Service/ Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Rating Period: OCTOBER 2014-MARCH 2015
To be filled in during planning
MFOs

KRAs

Objectives

Timeline

BASIC
EDUCATION
SERVICES

1. Teaching
Learning
Process

1. Prepared lesson plans of activities

including appropriate, adequate and
updated instructional materials within
the rating period.

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

Weight Performance Indicators

(Quality, Efficiency,
per KRA
Timeliness)
*Lesson Plan

20%

*Instructional Materials

*Integration of ICT in the

Classroom.
*Assessment Tools
2. Facilitated learning through
OCT. 2014functional lesson plans and innovative MARCH 2015
teaching strategies.
5%

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

*Attendance sheet of the

students in the class
5%

3. Provide differentiated activities,

that may arouse the learners interest.

*Utilize varied teaching

strategies/ activities/
materials/ Classroom
Management & Interaction.

2. Student
Outcomes

4. Monitored, evaluated & maintained

students' progress within the rating
period.

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

20%

Preparation & submission of

class record/ gradesheets

Students' Portfolio

Table of Specifications & TQs

Test Questions

5. Account learning outcomes.

6. Attained the required General
Scholastic Achievement (GSA) for
Grade Level & Learning Areas.
3. Personal,
Social,
Professional
Growth &
Development

4. Community
Involvement

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

5%

APRIL 2014MARCH 2015

5%

7. Participated and attended

trainings, seminars & work-shops
(School Level, Division, Regional,
National)

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

8. Develop one's self professionally.

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

9. Gain a network of support from

parents & community.

*Initiated/ Participated in cocurricular/ school activities

within the rating period.
10%

10%

OCT. 2014MARCH 2015

5%

10. Dialogue with parents of students OCT. 2014needing academic monitoring/ follow- MARCH 2015
up within the rating period.
11. Perform work/activities that
contribute to teaching learning
process.
PLUS FACTOR

Promotion
Failure
Permanent Grade Sheets
Average Achievement Rate

OCT. 2014 MARCH 2015

12. Provide opportunities for learners OCT. 2014 to develop their skills, talents &
MARCH 2015
attitudes.

5%
5%

5%

*Attendance to required
trainings/ seminars/
workshops.
*Programs/Projects/ Activities
undertaken/sponsored by the
parents/community.

*Dialogue with parents (One

on One Conference in School)

*Designated as
Disciplinarian/Scouting
*Winning Coach in Academic
& Non-Academic Contests/
Competitions

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

JOEL S.J. GARCIA

LARYSON F. BAGUMBAY

RATER

RATEE

PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSIO

Final Performance Results
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rating
3.45

Rater-Ratee Agreement

The signature below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form
Name of Employee:

Name of Superior:
LARYSON F. BAGUMBAY

Signature:

DR. SALIHMATAL H. LAGB

Signature:

Date:

Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths

Development Needs
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)

JOEL S.J. GARCIA

RATER

LARYSON F. BAGUMBAY
RATEE

FORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Rater: JOEL S.J. GARCIA
Position: Master Teacher-I
Date of Review:

anning

To be filled during evaluation.

Outstanding
(5)
0 instance found
to have no plan.

Very Satisfactory
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Poor
(4)
(3)
(2)
(1)
1-3 instances found 4-6 instances
7-9 instances
10 times or more
to have no plan.
found to have no found to have no instances found
plan.
plan.
to have no plan.

5 I.M.s/ Subject/
Rating Period

4 I.M.s/ Subject/
Rating Period

3 I.M.s/ Subject/
Rating Period

2 I.M.s/ Subject/
Rating Period

1 I.M./ Subject/
Rating Period

21 & above/year
Prepared 10 or
more

16-20/year
Prepared 8-9

11-15/year
Prepared 6-7

6-10/year
Prepared 4-5

5 & below
Prepared 3 &
below.

Teaching methods
and strategies
elicited 100%
interaction from
the class.

Teaching methods
and strategies
elicited 90%
interaction from
the class.

Teaching methods
and strategies
elicited 85%
interaction from
the class.

Teaching methods
and strategies
elicited 70%
interaction from
the class.

Teaching
methods and
strategies elicited
below 70%
interaction from
the class.

Attendance
checking was
100%
systematically
carried out.

Attendance
checking was 90%
systematically
carried out.

Attendance
checking was
85%
systematically
carried out.

Attendance
Attendance
checking was 70% checking was
systematically
never
carried out.
systematically
carried out.

RATING

Actual Result
Q

Class record
reflected the
bases of 100% of
students' ratings
in subject areas
handled.

Class record
reflected the bases
of 90% of students'
ratings in subject
areas handled.

Class record
reflected the
bases of 85% of
students' ratings
in subject areas
handled.

Class record
reflected the
bases of 70% of
students' ratings
in subject areas
handled.

Class record
reflected the
bases of below
70% of students'
ratings in subject
areas handled.

Students' Portfolio
contained 100%
of their
accomplishments.

Students' Portfolio
contained 90% of
their
accomplishments.

Students' Portfolio Students' Portfolio

contained 85% of contained 70% of
their
their
accomplishments. accomplishments.

Students'
Portfolio
contained below
70% of their
accomplishments
.

TOS showed
100% congruence
between content
& skills tested

TOS showed 90%

congruence
between content &
skills tested

TOS showed 85%

congruence
between content
& skills tested

TOS showed 70%

congruence
between content
& skills tested

TOS did not

show congruence
between content
& skills tested

TQs were 100%

logically
sequenced.

TQs were 90%

logically
sequenced.

TQs were 85%

logically
sequenced.

TQs were 70%

logically
sequenced.

TQs were not

logically
sequenced.

100%
0%
85% & above
MPS/GSA
Initiated at least 2
co-curricular /
school activities
with documented
results.

95-99%
01.%-0.5%
80-84% MPS/GSA

84% & below

1.6% & above
Below 70%
MPS/GSA

Pariticpated in
most of cocurricular/ school
activities with
documented
results.

Participation only No participation

without
in school
documented
activities.
results.

0 instance of non- 1 instance of nonattendance

attendance.

2 instances of
non-attendance

3 instances of
non-attendance

4 & above
instances of nonattendance

5 times per year

3 times per year

2 times per year

once per year.

10 or more/year

Initiated &
participated in cocurricular/ school
activities with
documented
results.

90-94%
85-89%
0.6%-1%
1.1%-1.5%
75-79% MPS/GSA 70-74% MPS/GSA

4 times per year

8-9/year

6-7/year

4-5/year

0.25

3 & below

5 or more
activities
performed

4 activities
performed

3 activities
performed

2 activities
performed

1 activity
performed

National Level

Regional Level

Division Level

District/ Cluster
Level

School Level

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISH-MENTS

DR. SALIHMATAL H. LAGBAS

Approving Authority

DISCUSSION
Adjectival Rating
vs

tured in this form.

MATAL H. LAGBAS

Timeline

Resources Needed

DR. SALIHMATAL H. LAGBAS

Approving Authority

To be filled during evaluation.

RATING

Score
Ave.

3.00

3.00

0.65

3.00
4.00

3.00 0.15

4.00 0.20

4.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

0.80

4.00

0.20

4.00

0.20

4.00

0.40

4.00

0.40

4.00

0.20

3.00

0.15

4.00

0.20

4.00

0.20

3.75