Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1997
copyrightk 1997 by the society for Applied Anthropology
0018-72591971030294-8$1.30/1
294
HUMAN ORGANIZATION
r or
295
The report warned that if "entry" into the gaming industry were
delayed "profits in the industry will have fallen" and the tribal
government would lose opportunities for revenue and
employment (EDC 1993:20). Tribal policy makers thus framed
the issue as one of revenue. Public testimony raising noneconomic issues was largely ignored. The report characterized
the opposition (which the subcommittee determined to be 29%
of those testifying) in the following passage:
The expressed concern on behalf of the Navajo People
testifying at the public hearings was that revenue
generated from gaming be set-asidefor further economic
development and infrastructural development and
educational investment. The Subcommittee agrees with
such opinion and makes the same recommendation (EDC
1993:21).
While such concerns are evident in a few statements recorded
in the report, there were several other concerns regarding
additional issues of economic, political and social or moral
importance. At the Northern Agency hearing, one individual
noted that gaming "might not work for a large tribe which does
not have a nearby urban center as a market" (EDC 1993:15).
Two individuals were concerned about loss of sovereignty (EDC
1993: 15-17). At Ft. Defiance "Ray Brown stated that gambling
is prohibited in the Navajo way of life" (EDC 1993: 17). This
was a unique expression but several individuals testified, more
consistent with the observation of Kluckhohn and Leighton,
that while gaming, per se, was not objectionable some people
would be unable to control the urge to gamble. Effie Chee
stressed that our people 'overdo' drinking and that they will
probably 'overdo' gambling" (EDC 1993: 12).
Our reading of the subcommittee testimony indicates
significant grassroots expressions of concern about the effects
of gaming on the fabric of Navajo society and individual
members of the tribe. Underlying these concerns was a clear
recognition that while casinos might attract tourists and thus
draw revenues from non-Navajos, a substantial portion of the
Navajo population itself would engage in these activities.
Indeed, the opening of the Ute Mountain Ute casino at Towaoc
(30 miles north of Shiprock) demonstrated that Navajos would
risk dollars at casinos. Our observations, and those of Navajos
we have asked, are that the largest segment of the gamblers at
the Towaoc casino are Navajo. The chairman of the Navajo
Nation's Economic Development Committee, David John,
stated "just look at Towoac [sic] ...That place fills up with
Navajos" (Kammer 1994:B2).
In July, 1994 the Tribal Council passed a gaming ordinance
by a substantialmargin (55- 16).President Zah who had in principle
supported gaming nevertheless vetoed the measure (Rushton
1994b:Al). The veto came less than a week prior to the primary
election in which Zah was campaigning for re-election. A
seemingly miffed EDC member, Herbert Pioche, said 'The veto
means we're losing over $100 million dollars annually and also
over 4,000 permanent jobs" (Rushton 1994a: 1). President Zah
explained that "the issue of gaming raises many social questions,
especially in an environment of poverty and high unemployment"
(Rushton 1994a:l). Zah added that two of the communities
proposed as casino sites had passed resolutions against gaming.
Zah proposed submitting the issue to the electorate. Councilman
~ i o c h cogently
e
commented on the veto: "It's the moral issues
versus economic development revenues" (Rushton 1994a: 1).
296
HUMAN ORGANIZATION
The Election
Table 1.
No
Total
Female
88
131
219
Total
212
24 1
453
Chi-square = 7.45
d.f. = 1
p < .O1
Sex Differences
The 501 interviewees were evenly divided between women
(246) and men (255). There is no statistically significant
difference by sex of interviewees among the six chapters. More
men were interviewed in Shiprock and St. Michaels, while
female interviewees outnumbered males in the other four
chapters.
Of the 453 voters who cast a vote on the gaming referendum,
male voters slightly favored the issue (53%) but females
opposed it by a substantial margin (see Table 1).
The difference between the sexes decreases (and becomes
statistically insignificant), however, when the Lechee chapter
voters are removed from the analysis. In Lechee, a proposed
gambling site, the malelfemale differences on the gambling
issue are exaggerated - Lechee women opposed gambling
more than most women in our sample; Lechee men favored it
to a greater degree than men in other chapters. By contrast, in
another proposed casino site, Shiprock, the percentage of men
and women voting on the issue was identical (52% no). In two
other chapters (Aneth and St. Michaels) both men and women
opposed gaming.'
Age Differences
297
Table 2.
Table 3.
Vote
Yes
No
Total
Chi-square = 37.57
18-34
Age
35-50
51-93
(#)
(#)
(#)
(#)
93
67
82
70
31
97
206
234
160
152
128
440
d.f. = 2
p < .O1
Total
298
HUMAN ORGANIZATION
Men
Women
Age Group
18-50
>50
18-50
>50
Vote on GamblingYes
98
22
77
9
No
56
52
81
45
Odds on Voting "No" on the Gaming Referendum'
Women: Men
1.9
Older: Youneer
4.3
'Model: Age*Sex Age*Gamble Sex*Gamble (i.e. no 3-way interaction)
Likelihood ratio chi-square = .077 df=l p=.78
Conclusion
In an interview conducted nearly a year after the election,
former President Zah identified four reasons that influenced
his decision to veto the Tribal Council's gaming resolution and
call for a referendum. First, the council did not specify how
gambling generated revenues would be used. Second, the
council designated sites for casinos contrary to the wishes of
the affected communities. Third, sovereignty would be
impinged by the signing of compacts with the states. Zah
asserted that "many of the elderly people said don't sign
compacts." Fourth, according to Zah, "it was a morality issue"
(Zah 1995).
According to Butler and Ranney (1978:224), "few countries
have referred moral issues, apart from liquor control, to popular
votes." Moreover, few issues have been subject to referendum
on the Navajo Reservation since the rejection of the Indian
Reorganization Act in the 1930s. The referral of the gaming
matter to the Navajo populace seems to have been a judicious
use of the referendum process. Gaming has been a focal point
for factionalism and violence on some reservations, for example
at Akwesasne (Hornung 1991). It is the sort of potentially bitter
and divisive issue that may benefit from legitimation by popular
vote (see Butler and Ranney 1978:222-223).
Navajo voters rejected the measure to legalize gaming in
the 1994 referendum by a relatively narrow margin. Although
the defeat of the measure can largely be attributed to older voters
and to female voters, concerns over pragmatic moral issues,
especially the social costs of gaming, were reasons cited by
'no' voters of all ages and both sexes. It seems to us that the
"conservatism" of older voters should not be attributed to any
"cultural" opposition to gaming. To the contrary, gaming has
long been a integral part of Navajo social life. Voters' opposition
VOL. 56, NO. 3 FALL 1997
299
(Rodgers 1993).
6Thisanalysis was performed using the HOLOGLINEAR program
in SPSSPC. See also Knoke and Burke (1980).
' The Hopi Tribe also rejected class 111 gaming in a referendum
held in the spring of 1995 but this was for an off-reservation gaming
site. In the Hopi election, 58% voted "no". The one news account we
have seen (Schill 1995) reports that the primary opposition to gaming
was on religious grounds and several voters quoted mentioned
preserving Hopi tradition. Although a social cost calculus may lurk
beneath the rhetoric of tradition, the Hopis quoted did not explicitly
focus on social ills and costs in the way stressed by Navajo voters in
our sample.
NOTES
300
HUMAN ORGANIZATION
REFERENCES CITED
Barfield, Chet
1995 Backing for Indian Gambling Unexpected; Speaker of
Assembly Supports Video Machines. San Diego Union A-3
(November 2, 1995).
Brodsky, Sascha
1994 "Navajos Reject Gambling, Choose Hale,"The Daily Times
(Farmington), 107:101, A-1, 1119194.
Butler, David and Austin Ranney, eds.
1978 Referendums: AComparative Study of Practice and Theory.
Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public
Policy Research.
Cohen, Felix S.
1982 Felix S. Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law. Rennard
Strickland, editor-in-chief. Charlottesville: Michie BobbsMerrill.
Daw, Raymond
1994 Letter to the Editor: "Time for Change." Navajo Times
(November 3,1994:A5)
Donovan, Bill
1994a Gaming Is Still Alive. Navajo Times, XXXIII (No. 35). Sept.
1, 1994, page A-1).
1994b Different Views Given On Gaming Issue. Navajo Times
(November 3, 1994:A-3)
Economic Development Committee of the Navajo Nation (EDC)
1993 Report and Recommendations of the Economic
Development Subcommittee [of the Navajo Tribal Council] on
Class I1 and Class I11 Gaming, October 20, 1993.
EngIer, Mark
1994a "Few Attend Navajo Nation Gaming Hearings." The
Independent (Gallup), October 18, 1994:Al.
1994b "Navajos Say No Gaming" The Independent (Gallup),
November 9, 1994:A-2
Goodman, Robert
1995 The Luck Business: The Devastating Consequences and
Broken Promises of America's Gambling Explosion. New York:
Martin Kessler Books.
Hornung, Rick
1991 One Nation Under the Gun: Inside the Mohawk Civil War.
New York: Pantheon Books.
Kammer, Jerry
1994 Navajos to vote on gaming. The Arizona Republic
(Phoenix), October 27, 1994: Bl-B2.
Kane, Paul
1995 House Passes Indian Gaming Tax; Battle Moves to
Conference. States News Service (October 27, 1995).
Kluckhohn, Clyde and Dorothea Leighton
1974 The Navaho, revised edition.Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Knoke, David and Peter J. Burke
1980 Log-Linear Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications,
Mayers, Jeff
1996 Thompson to Roll Dice on Gambling; He wants Video
Poker, New Deal with Indians. Wisconsin State Journal, January
3, 1996:A-1.
Mezey, Naomi
1996 The Distribution of Wealth, Sovereignty, and Culture
Through Indian Gaming. Stanford Law Review 48~711-731.
Navajo Elections Newsletter (NEN)
I995 I'll'niil Bo'oonish Baa Hane' Volume I, Number I. Window
Rock: Navajo Elections Office.
Propp, Wren
1994 Gaming Referendum Not on Navajo Ballot. The Daily
Times, (Farmington), 107:#28:A-1, August 28, 1994.
Rodgers, Larry (compiler and editor)
1993 I990 Census: Population and Housing Characteristics of
the Navajo Nation. Window Rock: Navajo Government.
Rushton, Ted
l994a Zah Vetoes Gaming; Wants Popular Vote. Navajo Nation
Messenger (Gallup) August 10, 1994, p.1).
1994b Zah Vetoes Gaming Law; Wants Dine' to Vote. The
Independent, (Gallup), August 6, 1994, A-1.
1994c "Legal Gambling, Brings Money, Addictions and Social
Problems." The Independent, (Gallup) October 10, 1994:Al-2.
Schill, Karin
1995 "Hopi's [sic] Vote NO, on Gaming Proposal." Navajo Times,
April 13, 1995:Al-A2.
Victor, Kirk
1995 Rolling the Dice with Republicans. The National Journal,
December 16, 1995:3099.
Zah, Peterson
1995 Interview with Scott Russell. October 19, 1995.