You are on page 1of 6

Substantive dialogue

Means necessary to secure peace to the world

(Compared with a systematic dialogue between the Islamic and Christian)

Dr / Zeinab Abdel-Aziz

Professor of French Civilization

Egypt

Dialogue is the means of expression between two or more, and expand over the words "or more"
to include a different group number or even entire peoples, that is the mainstay of links between
individuals in their dealings and make peaceful coexistence possible.
Therefore, we chose the selection of "dialogue" as a basis of peaceful coexistence between
Muslims and non-Muslim subject of this research; as there is between the employees of all
religions who do not want war and conflict, and seeks to world peace, objectively and honestly,
Until they all go in this research, which is divided into three parts:
1 - the concept of dialogue among Muslims.
2 - the concept of dialogue when Christians (through the documents of the Catholic Church,
which leads the process of dialogue at the global level)
3 - should be developed for common rules before you start the dialogue and not to the exclusion
of certain points for allegedly outside the scope of the debate.
1 - the concept of dialogue among Muslims:
Before we take up this concept, start with an outline of the dialogue itself, for controls, and
methods and obstacles. Explains Mr. Mohamed Badri ([i]) the importance of dialogue and
controls, including: the full hearing, and the demilitarization of ideas; because the goal of
dialogue is to take advantage of these ideas, not the destruction of people, and left mirrors and
dissonance; that the dialogue sort of consultation, which must of truth and clarity in the idea and
method, and adjust the path of dialogue with science and justice and common sense practice, and
access to the goal of dialogue of the shortest path away from the fraud and prevarication.
The art of dialogue depends on several methods, including: well-prepared to pave the common
grounds, is intended for constructive dialogue and not crush the other, or Ivhamh, and a
commitment to silence the conscious and logical sequence, and the introduction of meaningful
open to question, in accordance with the aphorism "art of the possible dialogue impossible", with
work on the dialogue away from the constraints of lack of access to the division and discord. And
most important of these constraints: intolerance and partisan, arbitrary classification, self-
bloated, single-view, the circular argument or sophistry, and xenophobia.
Najib explains Professor Nur al-Din ([ii]) that there was no direct meaning to the word of dialogue
in the written language, but considered by linguists, derived from Populus, including Ohar him
answer any reply, Ohrt and his answer, and Ohar word. And the name of Interviewing and Ahoir,
and said: I heard Hoiarhama and dialogue; and interacting with are: transponders, and dialogue to
respond (to San Arabs). The interviewer reviewed by any to speak, Ijaoppe transponders, and
dialogue to respond to the [Tabari].
The debate in the language means "high twisting" Jdlt cord Ojdelh controversy if stressed Vtlth
twist and read out the arbitrator .. The controversy is the conflict: Arguing Arguing controversy
Vangdl and twisted: Aljaddalp wrestled to a scheduled .. Magdala Mulki Paljdalp, the Earth (San
Arabs).
In other words, the dialogue is based on the literature and certain controls, through discussion
and exchange of views, committed to
Or work so far with a level of human progress, and the controversy assumed the existence of
antagonists and violent, and intensity as well as arrogance .. The word has taken on the idea of
talking useless controversy which is subject to the idea of endless mazes, but the most important
distinction between the two is that the dialogue depends on convincing the other party, and the
controversy is not intended only to wrestle the opponent in order to destroy it.
Therefore, the emphasis - in the Islamic concept - the need for impartiality in the request for truth,
and to enter the arena rights dialogue in search of the right even though it was when his
opponent, that is, axes - in the words of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali ([iii]) -: "Knashid stray ; does not
differentiate between stray on to show his hand or the hands of the assisted, and felt certain his
friend not an adversary, and to thank him if you knew him or showed him the error right. "
Explains Mr. Ahmed Aleqtisadiah ([iv]) characterize the Islamic approach based on "the overall
balance of justice and the full, there may be something obscure from the truth, or be buried a bit
of evidence that supports the offending words, this recipe is ugly indicate self-love and the lack of
equity.
And the integrity and objectivity of the center axes of the axes based on the scientific method,
which is expressed in modern terminology: Scientific Affairs.
Islam has urged dialogue to deal with the other because it is closer to the nature of the message
and content, and forbade the controversy edema Almottagadelan especially those who argue
without knowledge .. But see Mr. Mohammed Fadlallah ([v]) that the Qur'an is the "Book of the
dialogue," and that his primary goal is to reach to the right; also teaches the Koran wrong rejected
in toto in any site of its positions, to refrain from adopting wrong or to recognize its legitimacy,
That is not to reject the falsehood is a treason to the cause of right.
The defamation of God - the Almighty - of the right to withhold or wears unjustly, saying: (O
people of the book does not unjustly and ye shall put on the right you hide the truth and you
know) [Al-Imran: 71]; (Tlpsoa not truth with falsehood and conceal the truth and you know) [al-
Baqarah: 42] .
It is being called Professor / Muhammad Fadlallah, the words "The Book of Dialogue" at random
on the Koran, is already include various types of dialogue and the different variances, including:
dialogue with atheists, agnostics and to date, with the deniers of prophecy, and with the People of
the Book, Jews, Christians, and dialogue in the context of a question, and how to end the
dialogue, the dialogue also includes fiction with the prophets and with some models of humanity.
The word dialogue in the Holy Quran in three states: two in the cave: (said to his companion,
interviewer I'm over you money and respect of men) [al-Kahf: 34], (owner, said his interviewer Okfr
Him Who created you from dust) [al-Kahf: 37 ], and the third verse is contained in Surat argument:
(and complain to God and God hears Thaurkma God is Hearer, Seer) [argument: 1].
And extends the scene contain a single word of dialogue in the cave from verse 32 to verse 44
between the two men, one rich in the large gardens and the other poor owner of a small garden.
This example includes not only a model for dialogue between the two regions, no matter how
varied points of view or different motives, but it contains - in addition to that - a means extends
across time and space, as indicated by Mr. Abbas Mohajerani ([vi]), when he had compared the
position of men ( rich and poor) west of the position of Muslims, saying: "The case of the West
today Btgianh material and subscribed to the force and advanced technology and means of
sabotage and mass destruction like axes if the infidel gardens, and the situation of Muslims in
their weakness and delayed behind Western civilization and technology hubs such as the status
of insured men; with a difference large as the Muslims today do not have that confidence in God
and pride in monotheism, and steadfastness, sincerity, and strength of self-defense, which was
characterized by the axes insured. "
If this example was the physical aspect of earthly, the other example in Surat argue the
metaphysical aspect; pointing out that God touches every thing and listen to the dialogue
between people is the "Hearer, the Seer" ..
The word "controversy Btnoietha language contained in the Koran twenty-nine times, which are
two related to the dialogue when the build up to reach the degree of controversy of any violence,
which ranked the most severe of the dialogue of the widening gap between the views of
interlocutors, however, believe Almighty God recommends Muslim in his discussion with
Christians with regard to faith, ie, more accurate and relevant topics and most unlike; It is about
the same message reunification, saying: (and do not argue people of the book but one that is
better) [Spider: 46], (, and argue with the way that is best) [Nahl: 125].
This is in line to be the meaning of the etiquettes of dialogue and debate with the concept of unity
among the people as reflected in the Koran: it provides for the diversity of human beings and that
this diversity is intended to understanding and integration; and not discord and strife: (O people, I
have created you from male and female and made you into nations and tribes so that sight of God
that God knows expert) [rooms: 13], which is illustrated by Professor Mohammad Hasan al-Amin
([vii]), saying: "The idea of dating in the verse above is the idea of dialogue espoused by Islam, a
path to unity, and perhaps the concept of acquaintance is the highest expression of the idea of
dialogue, a term that focuses on aspects of Islamic and humanitarian dimensions of the idea of
dialogue, the term includes a precise indication of the role of knowledge, mutual knowledge, to
attain the highest forms of communication and interaction between individuals and humanitarian
groups. "
2 - the concept of dialogue when Christians:
Recognize from the foregoing that the dialogue in Islam has an essential function related to
human beings, and is accessible to the right and the deepening of faith, through knowledge,
understanding and exchange of views well and one that is better ..
In the West, has begun a dialogue with Plato that the art of stand-alone and is not intended to get
a result .. Or in the words of Plato: "The goal of dialogue is not providing us with information and
knowledge as far as its assistance to train in the art of debate!" , And moved the dialogue to enter
in the field of interaction between Christianity and Islam, even the deadliest forms of debate has
taken various forms and horrific, and explains Julian Reyes ([viii]). How "the dialogue has started
with Islam before the Crusades which stopped until the dissolution of preaching place, and how
this dialogue since the first moments was based on defamation and violence, and whose aim is to
distort Islam and Muslims."
Reyes points out that "the first reaction is due to the days where he received an czar Michael III of
Byzantium (842 AD - 867 AD) contain letters from Muslims rejected the idea of God incarnate in
Jesus. The Czar convert letters to Nestas, one of the intellectuals of the court, to answer them.
Nestas and responded saying: "Muhammad is obsessed with the idea of his proof, the adoption of
divine origin; which explains the method based on fraud, malice, hypocrisy, cunning and,
pretending, and lies" and his research concluded that "the message of the Quranic revelation of
Satan" [page 231].
He adds Julian Reyes, saying: "commentators and beat the Byzantines to the Qur'anic text to read
it with their own eyes aggressive Christians against Islam .. and so gradually formed a huge gap
between the Islamic and Christian conflict" [page 232].
Then continue, saying: "It is noted that the objections of the Muslims has been one that did not
change in any place, is critical of the deity of Jesus, the mystery of the Trinity, the worship of the
Cross, and veneration of icons, and prejudice to the oneness of God", he explains how he
"continued his controversial Christian in the search for evidence and proof that inferiority of Islam
to Christianity, with emphasis on personal discredit Mohammed and his followers and
accusations of violence that's used. and after being beat on the Koran, the Prophet, saying: It is
not a house of God, and it is not capable of giving salvation of human beings. "
Subsided and the Crusades until the dialogue started, aimed at trapping Islam by missionaries.
In the view of c. Leclerc ([ix]) that the Rev. Peter Esquire (1092 to 1156 m) is a leading dialogue
between Christianity and Islam in the West because "he told the Muslims: He will not start a
crusade in the new weapons but words." Which reveals the real meaning of dialogue in
Christianity since the first moments .. The dialogue initiated by the same priest with the respected
"Muslim Spain and resulted in the extermination of all and throw away Islam from Spain," as
described (Julian Reyes on page 245) of his book in question.
It is well established historically that was the first ordered the translation of the Quran into French
days of the war recovery, the interpreter has been requested "that the translation to erase any
trace of Islam from the minds of Muslims who have been newly made Christians in the war [book
Regis Blashir" The Koran ", in 1969 ].
There is no room here to talk about the start of the organization of missionaries in the late
Crusades after the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215, but Reyes was reviewed in detail to the modern
era, he explains how he "thrive European imperialism throughout the nineteenth century, began to
occupy strategic positions have been taken away from the influence of Muslims, including: Egypt,
Iran, Afghanistan and the Arab Middle East and North Africa "(p. 356), the intimate linkage
between colonialism and missionary of the issues that you no longer need to be further evidence,
Vmtabap ongoing events to explain how they have continued to this day .. But we will move to
Vatican II (1962 - 1965 AD), which represents a radical turning point in church history, Vatican;
which decided to exclude or contain the ideological differences between them and the various
churches to unite all in a war against Islam sweeping!
The document, known as "in our time" of the Vatican II as there are some truths in other religions,
that are considered as a seed or parts of Christianity; should Tnekayaa of impurity, while the
same document stresses that "the Church's mission is not desist from preaching that Christ is the
way, the truth, which is life; which people have to find when the completion of their religious life
and the reconciliation of God with human beings through "!
Explains Father Caspar ([x]) in his commentary on Vatican document in his dialogue with Islam:
"The text of the document avoided taking a position on the debate about the relationship between
biblical heritage of Islam, has walked many specialists in Islam to the method of Massignon;
which had been referred to the the presence of a small branch of the biblical heritage that they
Itlqvoh, while another group insisted on the differences between the Koran and the Bible ..
According to this second perspective is not Islam as a religion of the monotheistic religions from
Abraham, but simply by virtue of the gospel of religion-related metaphors taken from Judaism and
Christianity, The refusal of the Academy to take a position on the conflict, which is not yet over,
but only the development of Islam in the first row of the monotheistic religions other than
Christianity. "
Thus, the church still does not recognize the authenticity of revelation in Islam and download in
our master Muhammad, peace be upon him as the last of the prophets, simply to look "with
appreciation" in the words of the document, to the Muslims who worship the one God living and
lasting Rahman and the Almighty, the Creator of heaven and earth, who spoke to humans ".. no it
does not recognize that he had spoken to Muhammad through the revelation, nor does it ring a
message after the reunification that revealed the Koran has been done in the distortion of their
texts and switch; addition to shirk Toliham God after Jesus!.
Unfortunately, that dialogue should be the concept of the Church, since its inception and to this
day, does not mean it (the word crusade) instead of the arms in order to uproot Islam and
proselytizing Muslims. There is no room here to cite all references: the Church, which includes an
explanation of the meaning of dialogue that concept; but we will cite some examples of the most
important or those that we obtained, the following are some excerpts from the book entitled:
"Guidance for dialogue between Christians and Muslims" ([xi]) issued by the Vatican in 1969, after
the Second Vatican Council four years:
q there are two of them to be during the dialogue: to be honest, and to emphasize Christianity
according to the demand of the Church. (And the requirement of the church has become known).
q The most dangerous thing that can stop the interview: to discover the intention of the
interlocutor in Tnasirh, and if what has been ruled out of this situation between the Catholic and
non-Catholic, it did not rule out yet between the Christian and Muslim. If the question of the
interlocutor in this dialogue will we stop immediately, and this pause does not absolve us to
confirm our positions clearly.
q dialogue will lose all meaning if the Christian conceal or reducing the value of beliefs that differ
with the Koran.
q should avoid entering into discussions about what is contained in the Qur'an on Christ and
Christianity, but leave Muslim wondering about at will, we must remember that we accept the
mystery of Christ is the source of our faith.
q of the most important obstacles to dialogue what we have done in the past against Islam and
Muslims (any of the Ombudsman and the genocidal wars) and the bitterness returned to the
revival currently, has now been added the question of Israel and the attitude of the west, and we
as Christians know what is in our case this issue. We must always looking for a humanitarian;
especially that the solution to this problem is not in our hands.
q is not enough that the closer we get from the Muslims; but must reach the degree of respect for
Islam that represents the value of high human and progress in the religious development for
idolatrous.
q taking into account the Muslim misunderstanding of the Christian doctrine that the terms
contained in the Koran about Christianity distorted, they deny the Trinity, the incarnation of God
in Christ, and no dialogue in this area will face failure unless he changed the Muslim position.
q in any dialogue must be a Christian to convince the Muslim that Christianity is based on
monotheism and not discuss any details, what words to say to justify the doctrine of the Christian
(Trinitarian) will not be able to convince the Muslim who believes in the Trinity is not only
prejudice to the standardization, based on this to the Al-Tawhid (Say: God is the One, Allah, the
Eternal, no evidence has been born, and not like unto Him)
q the need to separate Christianity itself on the Western world and his anti-colonial and his
Muslim should not forget that after ..
q based on the dialogue of Christians is to separate what is religious and secular than in the
previous positions of the Church and the West from Islam and Muslims and the search for
common points.
q is still a Muslim because of doubts about the intentions of the Christian, the most difficult point
in the dialogue, so it should not be a Christian to express his indifference to do so, but he has to
listen to points of objection with the attachment in his heart all the beliefs of the Church.
q should rely on planting culture, and should not overlook the role played by the West in the third
world to change civilization.
q I have already for such a dialogue between Arabs, Christians and Muslims that began in the
past, Damascus (eighteenth century), Cordova (twelfth century), and the nearest of us in the
Middle East (nineteenth century), which still continues, and we hope to increase in the every place
where Christianity and Islam, will never stop to confirm the importance of cultural dialogue - (of
course, as an input for the purpose of baptism)!
q to be the participation of all Christians in this dialogue and not those who work in the church
alone.

###

In a book issued by the Apostolic Exhortation of Pope John Paul II in December 1984 on
"Reconciliation and penance in the mission of the Church today" ([xii]), a letter is located in the
one hundred and twenty-eight pages, composed of three parts; we read in the first chapter of Part
III the subject of "dialogue", is item No. 25, located in the six pages where we read:
q The dialogue for the Catholic Church is a tool, namely: a way to do work in the world today.
q The Second Vatican Council had pointed out that the church is a sign of this brotherhood, which
makes possible an open dialogue and greater force, by virtue of the message that is characterized
by: the lighting of the universe all the Gospel, and standardization of human beings in the spirit of
one.
q has singled out our predecessor Paul VI Department of dialogue is an important mission of the
Alambdup the words "church", and described the dialog and select a specific significance as it
said, "It is a dialogue of salvation", and does the promise of salvation and baptism.
q The Church used to improve the dialogue as a way to get people to recant and repent, and
through the renewal of their consciences and their lives profoundly renewed, in the light of the
mystery of redemption and salvation of Christ and the two wins Oklhma church service.
q The dialogue aimed at the correct permission in the first place to renew each individual;
mystical apostasy and repentance with respect for the conscience, depending on the patient and
careful, and progress step by step, as required under the conditions of people in our time.
q The dialogue of reconciliation, which is committed by the Church, especially through the activity
of the Holy See and its various organs, a complex dialogue accurately. It can be said: The Holy
See seeks to intervene with the rulers of the people and officials from various international forums
and join them in the dialogue or to urge them to dialogue in the interest of reconciliation, the
church amid numerous conflicts.

.‫ للترجمة‬Google ‫شكرًا لمساهمتك في تقديم اقتراح حول الترجمة في خدمة‬


Top of Form

<br> <br>Substantive
ar|en
dialogue <br> <br>Means
‫ مدى عبارة‬necessary
‫ وتتسع‬، ‫أو أكثر‬UTF-8
to‫شخصين‬
secure
‫بين‬peace
‫وسيلة التعبير‬
to ar
the
‫هو‬w‫الحوار‬
orld <br>
‫مصــــر‬
<br> <br>
‫<الفرنسية‬br>(Compa
‫ستاذة الحضارة‬

:‫ساهم بترجمة أفضل‬


‫]‬

‫إرسال‬

‫‪Bottom of Form‬‬

‫اللغات المتاحة للترجمة‪:‬‬

You might also like