Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AFAFKAMAR,'ALEXANDER
BALDWIN
YOUNG,A N D RAYMOND
EVANSMARCH^
Introduction
Previous studies employing slow Infrared Multiphoton Dissociation (IRMPD), as a probe of activation energy hierarchies
in the gas phase photolysis of proton-bound dimers, have
been carried out with each of 2-propanol (1-4), ethanol (3,
1-butanol(6), and deuterated propanols (7). With proton-bound
alcohol dimers it is possible to determine in some degree the
hierarchy of activation energies among the reaction channels
leading to loss of alkene, water, and monomer or parent
molecule. With the proton-bound dimers of 2-propanone and
4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone studied here, it is possible to
assess the activation energy hierarchy for loss of water and
monomer. IRMPD may be used also to differentiate between
isomeric ion species in the gas phase. The distinguishing criteria
for photochemical differentiation are relative absorptivity at
the wavelength available for laser irradiation and, of greater
importance, the photoproduct distribution, i.e. the ionic species
produced and their relative intensities. In some cases it is
informative to photolyze the species of interest in both the
ground state and in its nascent state; nascent ion internal
excitation is enhanced by multiple photon absorption to access
reaction channels of higher activation energy, limited in
practice, by competition between laser fluence and collision
frequency.
The ion-chemistry for each of 2-propanone, 4-hydroxy-4methyl-2-pentanone, and 4-methyl-3-penten-2-one is presented
'Registered in the Ph.D. programme in Chemistry Department,
Queen's University.
2 ~ d j u n cProfessor,
t
Department of Chemistry. Queen's University,
Kingston.
'~evisionreceived February 21, 1986.
Experimental
Although the basic apparatus has been described previously (1-3), a
brief description of the technique used in this work is presented here. A
three-dimensional quadrupole ion store (QUISTOR) mounted in place
of the ion source of a conventional quadrupole mass filter (Vacuum
Generators QXK 400), serves as the reactor in which ion/molecule
reactions take place over the period 0-200 ms. The ring electrode of the
QUISTOR has two central perforations diametrically opposed. A low
power CW C 0 2 laser beam is directed through a sodium chloride
window and through the first ring perforation, of diameter 3 mm. The
beam passes radially through the centre of the QUISTOR and totally
illuminates the ion cloud which rapidly becomes tightly focused at
the centre of the device. A portion of the beam passes through the
perforation at the opposite side of the ring electrode and is monitored
externally through a second sodium chloride window. The remainder
of the beam is thought to undergo multiple reflections within the
QUISTOR. The laser beam is chopped mechanically and phase-locked
with the pulsing sequence as shown in Fig. 1.
The repetition rate of the pulse sequence is controlled by a squarewave generator (Heathkit SG 18.4). The iaser beam is interrupted by a
PAR 222 chopper phase-locked to the square-wave generator. A range
1980
Heathkit
SG18A
L
JJ
1pZS-b7
I+-
Laser On
[3]
-L
where * denotes a degree of internal excitation. The nascent protonbound dimer may then be either collisionally deactivated
Axial Ejection
&--Reaction-+I
Time
. .. . .-
fl
I-
or may dissociate
[5I
Irradiarion+I
Time
[(CH3)zC012Ht*
mlz 117
CH3CO(CH3COCH3)+
rnlz 101
L---,
caI10+
+ H?O
mlz
'dz,"rI
n-e-----
+ CH4
99
Storage Time
------+I
[7]
KAMAR ET AL.
100
05
Thus the ion profile for m / z 110 in Fig. 3 is a composite of the two
isobaric ions.
While the ions of m / z 80 and m / z 82 observed in d6-2-propanone
were of low relative intensity, they can be reconciled with the
observation of ions of m / z 72,73, and 74 in 2-propanone as shown in
Fig. 2.
(i) Let us examine the possible origin for m / z 82 in d6-2-propanone.
The CSD902+species may lose CO or C2D2 to produce C4D90+and
C3D7O2+,respectively. The corresponding ions in 2-propanone would
be C4H90+,m / z 73 and C3H7O2+,m / z 75. The latter species was not
observed therefore ~ ~ ~ 9 0does
2 ' not lose C2D2.
The isobaric C 6 ~ 1 1 0ion
+ may lose C O to produce CsDll+ or lose
C2D2 to produce C4D90+. The corresponding ions in 2-propanone
would be C S H I + ,m / z 71, which was not observed, and C4H90+,m / z
73, which was observed. Thus we conclude that either reaction [12]
[I21 CsD902+* + C4D90+
or reaction [13]
+ CO
AH1*
/ / '
0
1981
103
Storage T~me (ms)
1982
or both.
The heats of formation of HCO' and C2H3' are reported as 33.9 and
332 kJ m o l l , respectively (12). The observation of m/z 74 infers that
the heat of formation of C3D6O2+is some 332 kJ molp' less than the
heat of formation of C5D902+plus internal excitation when reaction
[I41 is thermoneutral. By an argument similar to that presented above
for reactions [I21 and (131, it can be shown that for reaction [16]
to occur the heat of formation of C6D110+*must exceed that of
C5D901;* by some 298 kJ mol-' again provided that the enthalpy
changes for reactions [15] and [16] are similar. Thus the occurrence of
reaction [16] is less probable than reaction [IS].
The observation of C3H3+as a persistent ion species in each of the
systems studied here is in keeping with previous observations of this
species wherever the parent molecule has a 2-propyl grouping. The
reactivity of C3H3+ is discussed elsewhere (13).
Photochemical studies
The IRMPD of the collisionally relaxed proton-bound dimer of
2-propanone yielded but a single photodissociative channel, as is
[I71
[(CH3)2COlzH+
m/z 117
nhv
(cH~)~~+
o H(CH3)2C0
m/z 59
P=lxlO-"orr
Laser 1-1
Nn l a w r (---I
FIG. 4. Experimental sequence and results from IRMPD of 2-propanone protonated dimers at 1.O x l o p 4Torr. Dashed lines correspond
to the ion intensities in an experiment wherein the laser was blocked,
solid lines correspond to ion intensities obtained with laser irradiation
at 944 cmpl for the latter 80 ms of the experimental period.
impact mass spectrum, i.e. 38% relative ion intensity at zero storage
time, is due to CH3CO+, m/z 43; this primary ion reacts rapidly along
with other minor primary ions during the first 20 ms principally by
proton transfer reactions such as
[18]
CH3CO+*
m/z 43
+ (CH3)2C(OH)CH2COCH3
+
+(CH~)~C(OH)CH~COHCH
CH2C0
~
m/z 117
where * denotes a degree of internal excitation.
At this juncture, it is appropriate to consider the nature of the
C2H30+species which is observed in the electron impact fragmentations of simple oxygen-containing molecules. In the 2-propanone
system discussed above, it was suggested that the stabilization and
subsequent observation of the ion of m/z 101 may require a reactant
CH3COt of but modest internal excitation, while in the 4-hydroxy-4methyl-2-pentanone system it is evident from Fig. 5 that two forms of
CzH30+ exist which differ in reactivity. The temporal variation of the
ion abundance of m/z 43 in Fig. 5 clearly shows two linear components
in the decay curve; the bimolecular rate constant derived from the steep
component is almost an order of magnitude greater than that derived
from the shallow component. While one form of C2H30+may derive
its greater reactivity by virtue of internal energy, it is improbable that
the internal energy of some 90% of the initial C2H30+abundance
would survive the many collisions by which deactivation could occur.
The co-existence of C2H30+in three structures from a single precursor
has been reported (16). While as many as eleven possible isomeric
structures for C2H30+ have been examined recently, only five
structures will be considered here.
VI
VII
Of the potential C2H30- above. the acetyl cation (111). l-hydroxyvinyl cation (IV) and oxiranyl cation (VI) have been well characterized
as being stable, observable species (16-18): the acetyl cation is the
lowest energy isomer. The 1-hydroxyvinyl cation (IV) was found to
lie 181 kJ mol-I above 111, with a barrier to rearrangement by
KAMAR
100
[19]
CH~C~HCH~C(@H~(C~!&
(CH3j2C(0H)CH2COHCH3+*
mlz 117
(CH3j2C(OH)CH2COHCH2+ M
rnlz 117
I1
where M represents a collision partner, or may dissociate
I
P=6 x
Torr
mlz 99
VIII
rnlz 117
miz 99
60
miz 99
6=c-"1,
+ CH',
rnlz 83
120
IX
The possibility of CH4 loss occurring initially from m / z 117
followed by loss of H 2 0 to produce m / z 83 is rejected as no species of
m / z 101 was detected. Although the species of m / z 99 and m / z 83
have been observed previously (15), neither the structures of these
ions nor the identities of the neutral fragments ejected have been
investigated further except for an attempt to photodissociate m / z 99 by
multiphoton absorption as discussed below.
The principal minor primary ions, m / z 57, 59, 98, and 101 reacted
rapidly during the first 10 ms and linear plots of the logarithm of ion
intensities with time have been omitted from Fig. 5 so that the ion
profiles of the more stable ions may be portrayed clearly. After the first
20 ms of reaction time, the remaining unreacted m / z 43 ions isomeric
with CH3CO+ reacted slowly along with ions of m / z 83 and 99 in
proton transfer reactions to produce the protonated parent molecule,
m / z 117. At pressures higher than 6 X lo-' Torr, proton-bound dimers
of 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone of m / z 233 were observed.
Photochemical studies
+
IRMPD of (CH3)2C(OH)CH2COHCH3,m / z 117, was carried out
as described earlier. Two photoproducts as depicted in Fig. 6 were
observed.
nhv 10%
7
H~
CzH30'
'
+ C4H100
[23] ( C H ~ ) ~ C ( O H ) C H ~ C O H C
mlz 43
rnlz 117
I241
C6H1)0++ H 2 0
mlz 99
where n and n' are the minimum number of photons (hv) necessary to
overcome the activation energy barriers for reactions [23] and [24],
respectively. IRMPD has been shown to be a useful probe of activation
energy hierarchies when ground state reactants are irradiated. It is
concluded from the observed ratio of photoproducts obtained with
33 ms of laser irradiation that the activation energy for reaction [24] is
less than that for reaction [23]; this conclusion is supported by the
observation that with prolonged laser irradiation, the fractional yield of
reaction [23] can be increased.
1984
P ; S X ~ O -Tori
~
Laser 1-(
No Laser C--1
FIG. 6. Experimental sequences and results from IRMPD of protonated 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone at 6 X lop5 Torr. Dashed
lines correspond to the ion intensities obtained in an experiment
wherein the laser was blocked, solid lines correspond to ion intensities
obtained with laser irradiation at 944 cm-' for the latter 50 ms of the
experimental period.
In the discussion above of the ion chemistry of 4-hydroxy-4-methyl2-pentanone, it was assumed that the unreactive form of C2H30+had
been produced as a fragment ion upon electron impact. However,
during experiments using axial ejection in which all ion species of
mlz < 117 are ejected from the QUISTOR, it was observed that a
relatively unreactive form of C2H30+was generated by dissociation of
protonated parent molecules, as shown in reaction [25] which is the
thermal analogue of the photochemical process, reaction [23].
It is of interest to speculate on the possibility that the products of
reactions [23] and [25] are derived from the protonated keto form via a
4-centred elimination
whereas the products of reaction [24] are derived from the protonated
en01 form via a 6-centred elimination as depicted in reaction [20]. As
activation energies for 6-centred rearrangements are generally lower
than those for 4-centred, then the above speculative mechanistic
argument is consistent with the IRMPD results.
Let us consider now the structures of protonated 4-hydroxy-4methyl-2-pentanone and the isomeric cation formed by the addition of
2-propanone to protonated 2-propanone which has been identified in
reaction [3] as a proton-bound dimer. Parker et al. (15) found a
qualitative similarity between the relative ion abundances in the selfchemical ionization mass spectrometry (self-CIMS) of 2-propanone
and that of 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone; the relative ion abundances are tabulated in ref. 15 and reproduced here as stick form mass
spectra in Fig. 7. Furthermore, the same workers found that the CAD
spectrum of the m / z 117 ion, obtained with the magnetic ( B ) and
electric ( E ) sectors linked so as to maintain a constant B / E value, gave
the same daughter ions for both 2-propanone and 4-hydroxy-4-methyl2-pentanone although no spectra were given. On the basis of the
self-CIMS spectra and the CAD B / E linked-scan spectra, Parker et al.
concluded that the two species of m / z 117 had a common structure and
that protonated 2-propane must undergo an aldol condensation with
2-propanone in the gas phase identical wlth that of the acid-catalyzed
condensation of 2-propanone in the solution phase.
Relative ion intensities obtained by self-CIMS should be comparable
with those of a particular storage time as obtained in this work.
miz
FIG. 7. Relative abundances for self-CIMS of (a) 2-propanone and
( b )4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone.
KAMAR ET AL.
1985
P=6x
Torr
m/z
50
100
1 - H20]+,
In addition, ions were observed at m / z 215 [2M
m / z 175 [2M
1 - 58]+, and m / z 157 [2M
1 - H 2 0 - 58]+.
Isolation of the proton-bound dimer was beyond the limit of the
ramped rf sweep for axial ejection, thus it was not possible to isolate
m / z 233 for irradiation. The intensities of all of the above species
were diminished by IRMPD. As the fractional dissociation of the
[2M + 1 - H20]+ species exceeded that of the [2M 11' species, we
conclude that the former is a mixed associative dimer and the activation
energy for dehydration of [2M 1]+ exceeds that for the dedimerization process.
I261
Discussion
The structure of m l z 99 in 2-propanone constitutes a
problem. The loss of H 2 0 from a proton-bridged 2-propanone
dimer of mlz 117 must be explained. It has been demonstrated
earlier by IRMPD that the structure of the proton-bound dimer
of %-propanonemust differ from that of protonated 4-hydroxy4-methyl-2-pentanone, mlz 117. It is significant here that the
dehydration channel for the proton-bound 2-propanone dimer
is not accessed by laser irradiation. In an attempt to explain
the dehydration channel in the 2-propanone dimer which is
observed thermally only, we have considered the keto and en01
forms of protonated 2-propanone. MIND013 calculations show
the latter to be less stable by 110 W mol-' (15), hence relaxed
protonated 2-propanone is expected to exist as the keto form,
structure X , as opposed to the isomeric enol, structure XI.
nhv
[(CH3)2C(OH)CH2COCH3]x
(CH~)~C(OH)CH~COHCH~
+ (CH3)2C(OH)CH2COCH3
It is important to recognize that nascent proton-bound 2propanone dimers contain a minimum of 134 W mol-' (14)
excess internal energy if formed from fully relaxed neutrals and
protonated monomers.
As the protonated monomers, m l z 59, are formed via
exothermic proton transfer reactions, the nascent dimers may
contain more than 134 W mol-' and may isomerize to form a
mixed keto-en01 species of structure XI1 as opposed to the
anticipated fully relaxed structure XIII.
XIV
XV
preferred form as it is presumably the more stable of the two and
it lacks a 6-hydrogen. The presumption of greater stability of
XIV relative to XV is based on a comparison of the energies of
protonated acetaldehyde, XVI and protonated vinyl alcohol,
XVII
XVI
XVII
The heat of formation of protonated acetaldehyde is given by
I
FIG. 9. Schematic energy profile for rearrangements involving the
proton-bound dimer of 2-propanone.
XIV
IX
KAMAR ET AL
TABLE1. Activation energies for a-cleavage reactions of ionized methyl ketones estimated
from the appearance energy of the a-cleavage product and the ionization energy of the
methyl ketone
a-Cleavage reaction
AE (eV)
1E" (eV)
AE
1E- E,
"Reference 28.
'Reference 21.
~321
O'.
-A
+ CH3CO+
AH
136 LJ mol-l
mlz 43
XIV
m / z 99.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge with thanks the financial support
of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
of Canada, Trent University, and Queen's University for a
Graduate Student Assistantship to A. Kamar. We acknowledge
also the technical assistance of W. King and J. A. Tomlinson.
We are greatly appreciative of the co-operation of Drs. C . W.
Willis and D. Rayner of the National Research Council of
Canada for the loan of the C 0 2 laser. The constructive
comments of the referees are much appreciated.
1. R. J. HUGHES,
R. E. MARCH,and A. B. YOUNG.Int. J. Mass
Spectrom. Ion Phys. 42, 255 (1982).
R . E. MARCH,and A. B. YOUNG.Int. J. Mass
2. R. J. HUGHES,
Spectrom. Ion Phys. 47, 85 (1983).
R. E. MARCH,
and A. B. YOUNG.
Can. J. Chem.
3. R. J. HUGHES,
61, 834 (1983).
4. R. E. MARCH.
Ionic processes in the gas phase. Edlted b))M. A.
Almoster-Ferreira. D. Reidel Publishing. 1984. p. 359.
5. R. E. MARCH,
R. J. HUGHES,
and A. B. YOUNG.
Proc. 13th Conf.
British Mass Spec. Soc., Wanvick Univ. U.K. Sept. 19-22,
1983.
6. R. J. HUGHES,
R. E. MARCH,
and A. B . YOUNG.
Proc. 31st Ann.
Conf. Am. Soc. Mass Spec. Boston. 1983. p. 747.
7. A. B. YOUNG,
R. E. MARCH,
and R. J. HUGHES.
Can. J. Chem.
63, 2324 (1985).
A. KAMAR,
and
8. R. E. MARCH,A. B. YOUNG,R. J. HUGHES,
M. BARIL.Spectrosc. Int. J. 3, 17 (1984).
9. M. S. B. MUNSON.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 5313 (1965).
10. A. S. B L A I R ~ G.
~ ~HARRISON.
A.
Can. J. Chem. 51.703 (1973).
1988
11. G. B. DEBROU,
J. E. FULFORD,
E. G. LEWARS,
and R. E . MARCH.
Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 26, 345 (1978).
12. J. L. HOLMESand F. P. LOSSING.Int. J. Mass Spectrorn. Ion
Processes, 58, 113 (1984).
and F. P. LOSSING.Can. J. Chem. 57, 249 (1979).
13. J. L. HOLMES
14. J. W. LARSON
and T. B. MCMAHON.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104,
5255 (1982).
J. E. PARKER,
and G. P. SMITH.
15. J. A. HUNTER,C. A. JOHNSON,
14th Meeting of the British Mass Soc., Heriot-Watt Univ.,
Edinburgh, U.K. Sept. 18-21, 1984. Abstr. p. 24.
J. L. HOLMES,
J. E. SZULEJKO,
A. A. MOMMERS,
16. P. C. BURGERS,
Org. Mass Spectrom. 18, 254 (1983).
and J. K. TERLOUW.
17. J. VOGT,A. D. WILLIAMSON,
and J. L. BEAUCHAMP.
J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 100, 3478 (1978).
18. J. K. TERLOUW,
W. HEERMA,and G. DIJKSTRA.Org. Mass
Spectrom. 15, 660 (1980).
and L. RADOM.
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
19. R. H. NOBES,W. J. BOUMA,
105,309 (1953).
20. K. A. MCNEILand J. H. FUTRELL.J. Phys Chem. 76, 409
(1972).
K. DRAXL,B . W. STEINER,and J. T.
21. H. M. ROSENSTOCK,
HERRON.J. Phys Chem. Ref. Data, 6, Suppl. 1 (1977).
andR. D. LEVIN.J. Phys. Chem. Ref.
22. S. G. LIAS,J. F. LIEBMAN,
Data, 13(3), 695 (1984).
23. A. KAMAR,
R. E. MARCH,and A. 5 . YOUNG.Can. J. Chem.
To be published.
and L. RADOM.J. Am. Chem.
24. W. J. BOUMA,J. K. MACLEOD,
Soc. 101,5540 (1979); J. L. HOLMES,
J. K. TERLOUW,
and F. P.
and
LOSSING.
J. Phys. Chem. 80, 2860 (1976); J. L. HOLMES
F. P. LOSSING.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104, 2648 (1982).
25. J. F. Cox and D. PILCHER.Thennochemistry of organic and
organometallic compounds. Academic Press, New York. 1970.
26. W. J. BOUMA,R. N. NOBES,S. SAEBO,and L. RADOM.Chem.
Phys. Lett. 99(2), 112 (1983).
Org. Mass Spectrom.
27. M. L. SIGSBY,
R J. DAY,and R . G. COOKS.
14, 273 (1979).
28. R. D. LEVINand S. G. LIAS. Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. 71
(1982).