Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Strengthening structures via external bonding of advanced fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composite is becoming very
popular worldwide during the past decade because it provides a more economical and technically superior alternative
to the traditional techniques in many situations as it offers high strength, low weight, corrosion resistance, high fatigue
resistance, easy and rapid installation and minimal change in structural geometry. Although many in-situ RC beams
are continuous in construction, there has been very limited research work in the area of FRP strengthening of continuous beams.
In the present study an experimental investigation is carried out to study the behavior of continuous RC beams under
static loading. The beams are strengthened with externally bonded glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) sheets. Different scheme of strengthening have been employed. The program consists of fourteen continuous (two-span) beams with
overall dimensions equal to (1502002300) mm. The beams are grouped into two series labeled S1 and S2 and each
series have different percentage of steel reinforcement. One beam from each series (S1 and S2) was not strengthened and
was considered as a control beam, whereas all other beams from both the series were strengthened in various patterns
with externally bonded GFRP sheets. The present study examines the responses of RC continuous beams, in terms of
failure modes, enhancement of load capacity and load deflection analysis. The results indicate that the flexural strength
of RC beams can be significantly increased by gluing GFRP sheets to the tension face. In addition, the epoxy bonded
sheets improved the cracking behaviour of the beams by delaying the formation of visible cracks and reducing crack
widths at higher load levels. The experimental results were validated by using finite element method.
KEYWORDS: continuous beam; flexural strengthening; GFRP; premature failure;
*Corresponding Author:
Ketepalli Sravani,
Citation:Ketepalli Sravani,(2014)STRENGTHENING OF
RC BEAMS USING FRP SHEET
INTRODUCTION
General
To keep a structure at the same performance level,
it needs to be maintained at predestined time intervals. Ifthe lack of maintenance has lowered the performance level of the structures, the need to repair
up to the original performance level is required. In
case, when higher performance levels are needed,
upgrading of the structure is necessary. Performance level means load carrying capacity, durability and function. Upgrading refers to strengthening,
increased durability and change of function.
The fundamental aim of this work is to give clear
guidelines for the process of strengthening rein-
ofreinforced concrete beams has been studied extensively as a method to strengthen existing reinforcedconcrete structures. Experimental results
have proven that these techniques can be an effective means ofincreasing a beams flexural capacity
and stiffness. However, a problem that has been
encounteredduring the testing of reinforced beams
with epoxy-bonded plates is separation of the plate
from the beamat the plate termination prior to concrete compression failure. Furthermore, there is
some question as tothe loss of the ductile failure
mode usually associated with reinforced concrete
failure when carbon fibersheets and plates are used
for external reinforcement. The use of expansion
anchors has been examinedas a method of eliminating epoxy-bonded plate tear off at termination.
Bonding of steel and fiber-reinforced plastics is the
most popular means of reinforcing existingconcrete
beams. However, applying epoxy can be a delicate
process requiring near perfect workingconditions.
The beam must be properly prepared for epoxy application (smooth, flat, sandblasted, dustfree,clean
surface), and the thickness of the epoxy layer must
be uniform. Perfect conditions are not thenorm
when one is working in the field. This procedure can
be successful, but the quality controlmeasures can
be extreme. A solution to this problem is to take
advantage of the fact that bolts have beensuccessful
in stopping plate tear-off, and go one step further
and use anchor bolts as the main system ofanchoring supplemental external steel reinforcement to the
beam. This method can be used underfrequently
encountered field conditions since the work environment need not be ideal and prep work formounting the reinforcement is minimal (aside from drilling
holes into the flexural member).
In the 1980s, fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) materials began being used in civil engineering applications. The external strengthening of reinforced concrete members was an ideal use for preformed FRP
strips, which are lighter and easier to install than
steel strips. FRP strips do not rust when exposed
to moist environments as do steel strips. Currently
FRP strips are bonded to the concrete surface in the
same manner as the steel strips, and the concrete
substrate requires similar preparation as it would
for the bonding of a steel plate. The adhesive layer
between the concrete and strip can present problems for the behaviour of the strengthened flexural
member. Peeling stresses are induced in the ends of
the strip, which tend to pull the strip away from the
concrete. If these peeling stresses are larger than
the strength of the adhesive, the strip will peel away
from the beam suddenly. This results in the beam
losing the increase in strength provided by the strip,
and may cause a sudden and catastrophic failure.
E-Glass:
The most common reinforcing fibre is E-Glass,
which derives its name from its electrical resistance. E-glass is available in a variety of forms such
as continuous rovings, woven rovings, stitched fabrics, unidirectional tapes and chopped fibre mats
or Chopped Strand Mat (CSM) as it is commonly
known. The fibre is very economical and of moderate strength but low modulus (stiffness).
Carbon:
Carbon fibre is the most expensive of the more
common reinforcements, but due to its very high
strength and stiffness it is the most commonly used
fibre.
C, R and S Glass:
C glass is a chemical resistant grade mainly used
in the production of surface tissues to protect the
surface of a laminate. R glass and S glass are high
strength grades. Aramid Aramid, or Polyaramid fibres such as Kevlar 49 are man-made organic fibres
offering very high tensile strengths and low density.
Aramid fabrics are very soft and easy to handle.
28
Experimental Study
Experimental Program:
A total of six rectangular beams were tested to find
the effectiveness of the strengthening process using GFRP laminates. Two beams were tested as controlled beams for flexure, while the remaining four
beams were strengthened using GFRP mats and
tested with the goal of increasing their flexural capacities. The concept is based on the fact that the
force developed in the GFRP mat is due to contact
between the materials because of the bond which is
responsible for the increase in flexural capacities.
This paper provides information regarding
(i)Deformation characteristics of load versus deflection
(ii)Ductile capacity of composite beams.
Casting Of Specimen:
For conducting experiment, the proportion of 1: 1.9:
3.91 is taken for cement, fine aggregate and course
aggregate. The mixing is done by using concrete
mixture. The beams are cured for 28 days. For each
beam six concrete cube specimens were made at the
time of casting and were kept for curing. The uniaxial compressive tests on produced concrete (150
150 150 mm concrete cube) were performed and
the average concrete compressive strength (fcu) after 28 days for each beam is shown in tables.
Description
Cement
Sand (Fine
Aggregate)
Course
Aggregate
Water
Mix Proportion
(by weight)
1.9
3.91
0.51
Quantities
of materials
213
404.7
832.83
108.63
GFRP Composites:
E-Glass fiber in the form of woven fabric of600gm/
sq.m is used for strengthening purposes. Forbonding these fabric mats with RC beams, 45% byweight
of general purpose Iso resin is used.
Strengthening Configurations:
Two strengthening configurations were adopted usingGFRP mats for flexure beams which are shown
in figure. Externally they are wrapped by a (i) Singlelayer at two vertical sides, and tension bottom
face(GFRP1) and (ii) Double layer at two vertical
sides andtension bottom face(GFRP2).
ReinforcementOf Beam
Loading frame
Loading System
31
Bonding epoxy
Flexural Zone
and a thin film of polyvinyl alcohol was applied as a
releasing agent by the use of spray gun. Laminating
starts with the application of a gel coat (epoxy and
hardener) deposited in the mould by brush, whose
main purpose was to provide a smooth external surface and to protect fibers from direct exposure from
the environment. Steel roller was applied to remove
the air bubbles. Layers of reinforcement were applied and gel coat was applied by brush. Process
of hand lay-up is the continuation of the above
process before gel coat is hardened. Again a plastic sheet was applied by applying polyvinyl alcohol
inside the sheet as releasing agent. Then a heavy
flat metal rigid platform was kept top of the plate for
compressing purpose. The plates were left for minimum 48 hours before transported and cut to exact
shape for testing.
Determination Of Ultimate Stress, Ultimate Laod
And Youngsmodulus:
The ultimate stress, ultimate load and youngs modulus was determined experimentally by performing
unidirectional tensile test on the specimens cut in
longitudinal and transverse direction. The specimens were cut from the plates by diamond cutter
or by hex saw. After cutting by hex saw, it was polished in the polishing machine.
Failure Plane
Debonding Failure
Compression Failure
SHEAR TENSION FAILURE:
This type of failure is also common in short beams
and it is similar to diagonal tension failure. First
33
we can see a shear crack that is similar to the diagonal crack that goes through the beam; the crack
extends toward the longitudinal reinforcement and
then propagates along the reinforcement that results in the failure of the beam.
Failure Pattern OfDouble Layer GFRP2Beam
Shear Torsion Failure
RESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS:
FAILURE PATTERN OF CONTROL BEAM:
The beam was so designed that it fails by flexure.
The beam was tested up to 42kN. The yield of steel
was found at 37kN. With further increase in the
load, regularly spaced flexure and shear cracks were
observed and they extended from the bottom of the
specimen towards the top fiber as shown in figure.
Failure Mode
Pu(KN)
=Pu(strengthened beam)
Pu(Control beam)
Control beam
Flexure failure
42
Single layer
GFRP1
Debonding failure
without concrete
cover
66
1.57
Double layer
GFRP2
Tensile rupture
92
2.19
FAILURE
BEAM:
PATTERN
FOR
STRENGTHENING
34
Ductility:
A qualitative measure of ductility has to be with
reference to a load deformation response. A ductileresponse would be reflected in the deformationincreasing at nearly constant load. The ratio of
theultimate deformation to the deformation at thebeginning of the horizontal path can give a measure
ofductility.
Ductility has generally been measured by a ratio
calledthe ductility index or factor (). The ductility index isusually expressed as a ratio of rotation
(), curvature(), deflection (displacement) (M), and
absorbed energy(E) at failure (peak load) divided by
the correspondingproperty when the steel starts
yielding. In the presentstudy, ductility was obtained
based on displacement and absorbed energy methods.
Displacement Ductility:
Figure shows the response of a strengthened RCbeam. Point A corresponds to initial concrete
cracking,point B to the first steel yielding, and point
C to failure.Based on Figure , the displacement ductility index is defined by Eq. Where Mu is the mid
span deflection at ultimate beamload and My is the
mid span deflection at yielding loadof the tensile
steel reinforcement at the central support.
Type Of
Beam
(u)
(y)
()
Increase
(Eu)
(Ey)
(E)
overthe
control
beam(%)
(mm)
(mm)
By
Eq.(1)
Control
beam
20
2.5
Singlelayr
GFRP1
29
9.5
Double
layer
GFRP2
38
11
Increase
overthe
control
beam(%)
kN
kN
By
Eq.(2)
42
37
1.13
3.05
22
66
57
1.16
3.45
38
92
78
1.18
In solving the differential equations through integration, there will be constants of integration that must
be evaluated by using the boundary and continuity conditions. The variables whose values are to be
determined are approximated by piecewise continuous polynomials. The coefficients of these polynomials are obtained by minimizing the total potential
energy of the system. In FEM, usually, these coefficients are expressed in terms of unknown values
of primary variables. Thus, if an element has got n
nodes, the displacement field u can be approxi
Finite element method (FEM) is a numerical method for solving a differential or integral equation. It
has been applied to a number of physical problems,
where the governing differential equations are available. The method essentially consists of assuming
the piecewise continuous function for the solution
and obtaining the parameters of the functions in a
manner that reduces the error in the solution.
Formulation:
The governing equation for beam is given in Equation 5.1.
d2 y
M=
EI
d x2
The displacement field v(x) assumed for the beam
element should be such that it takes on the
Test Beam
35
Beam Element Forces
The following sign convention is considered for the
deflection calculation.
(a)x is +ve towards right
(b)y is +ve upwards
(c)Anticlockwise slopes are +ve
(d)Sagging BM are +ve
Three element mesh is taken as shown in Figure.
Subdividing the span AD into three elements with
a node at the load point has the advantage that,
the nodal forces can be specified very easily. The
meshing has also ensured that all elements are of
uniform size, for easy hand calculation. Following
the standard procedure, the global stiffness matrix
and force vector is obtained as below,
{K}8x8{U}8x1 = {F}8x1
Since there are four nodes and two d.o.f. per node,
the global stiffness matrix is of size (8x8) and {F} is
a column vector of size (81). The boundary conditions stipulate that the vertical deflection be zero at
node 2 and 4.
Boundary conditions are the known values of deflection and slope at specified values of x. Here the
following boundary conditions are used for the exact analysis of the beam.
At x =L/2; y=0
At x= 3L/2; y= 0
It promises a great scope for future studies. Following areas are considered for future research:
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the Investigation the Following Conclusions were made:
36
REFERENCES:
[1] ACI Committee 440, Starte-of-the-art report on fiber
reinforced plastic reinforcement for concrete structures,
Report ACI 440R-96, USA: American Concrete Institute,
1996.
[2] Aiello MA, Valente L, and Rizzo A, Moment redistribution in continuous reinforced concrete beams strengthened with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer laminates,
Mechanicsof Composite Materials, vol. 43, pp. 453-466,
2007.
[3] Aiello MA, and Ombres L, Cracking and deformability
analysis of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with
externally bonded carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheet,
ASCEJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 16,
No. 5, pp.292-399,2004.
[4] Akbarzadeh H, and Maghsoudi AA, Experimental
and analytical investigation of reinforced high strength
concrete continuous beams strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer, Materials and Design, vol. 31, pp. 11301147, 2010.
[5] Arduini M, and Nanni A, Behaviour of pre-cracked R.
C. beams strengthened with carbon FRP sheets, ASCE
Journal of Composites for Construction, vol. 1, No. 2, pp.
63-70, 1997.
[6] Ashour AF, El-Refaie SA, and Garrity SW, Flexural
strengthening of RC continuous beams using CFRP laminates, Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 26, pp.
765-775, 2003.
[7] Bank LC, and Arora D, Analysis of RC beams strengthened with mechanically fastened FRP (MF-FRP) strips,
Composite Structures, vol. 79, pp. 180191, 2006.
[8] Bousselham A and Chaallal O, Behavior of reinforced
concrete T-beams strengthened in shear with carbon fiber
reinforced polymer - an experimental study, ACI Structural Journal, vol. 103, pp. 339347, 2006.
[9] Brosens K, and Gemert D, Anchoring stresses between concrete and carbon fiber reinforced laminates,
Non-metallic (FRP) Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, Proc.of 3rd International Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 271278, 1997.
[10] Ceroni F, Experimental performances
of
RC
beams strengthened with FRP materials,Construction
and Building Materials, vol. 24, pp. 1547-1559, 2010.
[11] Chahrour A, and Soudki K, Flexural response of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with end-anchored
partially bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer strips,
Journal ofComposites for Construction ASCE, vol. 9(2),
pp. 170177, 2005.
[12] Concrete Society, Design guidance for strengthening concrete structures using fibre composite materials,
Report No. 55, 71p, 2000.
[13] El-Refaie SA, Ashour AF, and Garrity SW, CFRP
strengthened continuous concrete beams, Proceedings of
the ICE - Structures and Buildings, pp. 395 - 404, 2003.
[14] El-Refaie SA, Ashour AF, and Garrity SW, Sagging and hogging strengthening of continuous reinforced
concrete beams using carbon fibre-reinforced polymer
[27] Jumaat MZ, and Alam MA, Experimental and numerical analysis of end anchored steel plate and CFRP
laminate flexurally strengthened R. C. beams, International Journal ofPhysical Sciences, vol. 5, pp. 132-144,
2010.
[28] Jumaat MZ, Rahman MM, and Rahman MA, Review
on bonding techniques of CFRP in strengthening concrete
structures, International Journal of the Physical Sciences, vol. 6(15), pp. 3567-3575, 4 August. 2011.
[29] Kadhim, Effect of CFRP Sheet Length on the Behavior of HSC Continuous Beam, Journal of Thermoplastic
composite materials, Vol. 00, 2011.
[43] Orton, SL, Jirsa JO, and Beyrak O, Design considerations of carbon fiber anchors.Journal of Composites
for Construction, vol. 12(6), pp. 608616, 2008.
[44] Pan JL, and Leung CKY, Effect of concrete composition on FRP/concrete bond capacity. Journal of Composites for Construction, vol. 11(6), pp. 611618, 2007.
38
AUTHOR
K. Mythili
Associate Professor, Department Of Civil Engineering, Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research
Academy,Hyderabad, India
G.Venkat Ratnam
Associate Professor, Department Of Civil Engineering, Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research
Academy,Hyderabad, India
Ketepalli Sravani
Research Scholar, Department Of Civil Engineering,
Aurora's Scientific Technological & Research Academy,
Hyderabad, India
39