Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROUND
Author: Jon Miller
Researcher: Andrew Rella
Project Manager: Jon Miller
Davidson Laboratory
Stevens Inst. of Technology
arella@stevens.edu
jmiller@stevens.edu
hydrodynamic modeling that was used to establish both the typical and storm conditions at each site. This
data was compiled and was used to create a holistic picture of each site including the background and storm
conditions. This evidence was used to develop conclusions based on engineering judgement as to why
each project performed the way it did. Separate reports have be generated that describe the evidence and
conclusions for each individual site. This document summarizes the common themes that were identified
through these analyses, and presents some recommendations for improving regulation, design, and construction of future projects.
While there were a number of site specific factors that led to the poor performance of some of the projects,
there were some common factors that were identified. These included:
In addition, although it was not observed directly at any of the sites, the issue of increased erosion on the
leeside of structures from when floodwaters receded was identified by the Sustainable Shorelines Forensic
Analysis Technical Advisory Panel as potentially significant during Sandy and a cause of concern for future
designs. As with the factors related to poor performance, there were a mixture of site specific and general
factors that were associated with strong project performance. Some of the general factors included:
The willingness and ability to use an adaptive management approach to correct identified deficiencies
Maturity of vegetation
These general performance factors are discussed in more detail below, followed by a set of recommendation based on observations made during the forensic analysis.
MATURITY OF VEGETATION
The maturity of the vegetation at several of the sites was determined to be a critical factor in the survival
of plantings and the overall resilience of the shorelines. The clearest evidence is provided by the Esopus
Meadows site which experienced heavy damage and erosion during a spring storm in April 2007. The
storm occurred less than one year after the projects completion and before the vegetation had time to mature. Much of the smaller vegetation was uprooted, while some of the larger vegetation was rearranged as
it slid down slope during the storm. The decision was made to work with nature, and the project was
repaired by reinforcing the storm modified slope with a biodegradable mat, secured with new plantings.
The modified project was thriving when Irene, Lee, and Sandy occurred and experienced only minimal
damage during the storms. The maturity of the vegetation (combined with the modified slope) is believed
to be responsible for the resilience of the site. Hindcasts were not performed for the April 2007 storm;
PAGE 2
however, in all likelihood, the conditions during the storm did not exceed those experienced during Irene,
Lee, or Sandy. It should be noted that the site also withstood the March 2010 Noreaster which was a storm
similar to the April 2007 storm.
Mature vegetation also likely helped to stabilize the slopes at Habirshaw Park and Coxsackie Boat Launch
during Post-Tropical Storm Sandy; however, both sites were submerged at the storms peak, reducing the
amount of time the vegetation was exposed to the most damaging conditions. Conversely, the immature
vegetation at Oak Point and Hunts Point provided little resistance to the erosional forces experienced at
those sites.
SLOPE COMPATABILITY
Oversteepened slopes were determined to be one of
the primary factors responsible for the amount of
damage that occured to the Oak Point project during
Sandy. At Oak Point the steep slopes were dictated
to some extent by regulatory requirements. NY State
Department of Environmental Conservation
regulations prohibit filling below the mean high
water line unless a reasonable and neccesary
criteria is met. Flood insurance requirements on the
other hand dictate that the site elevation exceed 13 ft
NAVD 88 (elevation of the neighboring coastal A
zones). Traditional wetland slopes on the order of 1
(Vertical) on 10 (Horizontal) dictate a horzontal
distance of at least 130 feet to achieve the required
PAGE 3
elevation change, however some parts of the Oak Point site have less than 30 horizontal feet. As a result
some sections of the Oak Point site were constructed with slopes as steep as 1 on 2. Such steep slopes make
the site extremely vulnerable to erosion not only from waves and storms, but also from runoff (which has
also been identified as a problem). During Sandy, the steep slopes were impacted by a combination of
large waves and extreme amounts of heavy debris that combined to scour away soil and vegetation. While
the upland area was largely protected due to its elevation, the wetlands restoration project at the site was
nearly completely destroyed.
Esopus Meadows, Coxsackie, and Hunts Point are
three sites where the survivial of the vegetation can
be at least partly accredited to mild sloping
shorelines.
As discussed above, at Esopus
Meadows a spring Noreaster less than a year after
the projects consruction significantly damaged the
original project. The milder, storm-modified slope
was incorporated into the revised project design
and successfully resisted the three histroic storm
events. The Esopus Meadows project is discussed
further in the Adaptive Management section of this
report. The Hunts Point Landing and Habirshaw
sites are additional examples of locations where
mild slopes may have minimized damage during
Figure 5 - Naturally sloping shoreline at Habirshaw
the three historic storms. Each site benefits from
Park in June 2004 (Photo by: Sven Hoeger).
being in a location where the horizontal space
constraints faced at Oak Point are less of an issue. As a result, more natural slopes on the order of 1 on 10
were used at each of those sites. During the historic storms, there is a tendency for the mild sloping sites
to be innundated and/or have any debris ride up, rather than gouge into the slope. Although not the focus
of this study, the mild slopes likely play a similar role in limiting the damage due to ice.
DEBRIS IMPACT
During Post-Tropical Storm Sandy, erosion and scour caused by large floating debris was determined to
be the primary cause of damage at several of the sites. This was particularly true for the Oak Point and
Hunts Point sites. At both of these locations, even during non-storm conditions debris accumulation is
common. Particularly in urban areas, debris removal can be a common and costly component of the maintenance associated with shoreline projects (Habirshaw Park is another example). During Sandy, the flooding
and storm damage that occurred throughout the region resulted in an extensive amount of floating debris
entering the water. As a result of the intensity of the storm, a significant amount of this debris consisted of
large, heavy objects that when thrust against an unprotected embankment, were capable of causing severe
damage. At Oak Point, the amount of debris which had to be removed from the site after the storm provided direct evidence of the nature of the conditions experienced. The coved nature of the shoreline at Oak
Point is particularly conducive to the collection of debris. Once inside the cove, the debris becomes trapped
PAGE 4
and the shoreline is abraded continuously over the duration of the storm. At Hunts Point there was less
direct evidence, but plenty of indirect evidence as to the impact of debris during Sandy. While all of the
structural elements of the Hunts Point project survived Sandy intact, much of the vegetation and many of
the ancillary project elements were damaged. Damage to sturdy ornamental project features such as water
fountains and fences provide evidence as to the power and destructive capabilities of the debris laden flow.
It is believed that the sloping terraced nature of the site, combined with the appropriately sized and placed
structural elements limited erosion and damage to the structural features at the Hunts Point site.
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
core of the structure will not wash out through the spaces between the larger armor stones on the surface.
If the core material is washed out, eventually the revetment will collapse on itself and slump, reducing its
effectiveness in protecting the shoreline.
Figure 11 - Fine material washed out of the Irvington revetment in March 2014.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In light of the conclusions reached during the forensic analyses, the following recommendations are made
for improving the storm resilience of future shoreline stabilization projects.
1.
More research needs to be done on the performance of ecologically enhanced stabilization approaches during heavy ice and debris conditions. Currently only minimal engineering design
guidance exists on the consideration of debris and ice forces on structures. The guidance is even
more limited for non-traditional structures. The importance of debris and ice loads are expected
to be more significant as we move away from traditional hard structures towards ecologically enhanced shorelines that tend to be softer. Research focused on replacing several existing rule of
thumb relationships with more physically-based design approaches should be emphasized.
2.
More research needs to be done in the area of plant material selection. Research should be conducted on the type and placement of vegetation for optimal stability. This is critically important
for shoreline stabilization approaches that rely on vegetation to provide resistance to erosion. In
particular, information on the growth of root systems and how they influence the stability of the
substrate and structural components of hybrid stabilization approaches is lacking.
3.
Proper monitoring and maintenance are important to the long-term performance of all projects;
however, it is critical for ecologically enhanced shoreline projects. Adaptive management was
identified as a critical factor in the performance of several of the projects analyzed. The inclusion
of maintenance plans as a part of the design and funding of ecologically enhanced shoreline projects is suggested. The existing regulations need to be examined, and if necessary modified to allow
PAGE 8
for maintenance and if necessary adaptive management of ecologically enhance shoreline stabilization projects.
4.
5.
Terracing or other measures should be used to avoid unnatural slopes. Different types of vegetation have different preferred growing conditions, with one of the important factors being slope.
When placed on unnaturally steep slopes, wetland vegetation typically does not grow well and is
extremely vulnerable to scour and erosion. Several sites analyzed for this project effectively utilized terraces as a means to achieve the required vertical elevation difference, while also preserving
natural habitat slopes. Terraces are also effective at reducing the potential damage from debris
and ice. The milder slopes of a terrace encourage debris and ice to ride up the slope rather than
cut into the slope as is common on steep shorelines.
6.
PAGE 9