Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Issue:
Whether or not Isabela Sawmill ceased to be a partnership and that
creditors could no longer demand payment.
Ruling:
Facts:
Magdusa v. Albaran
5 SCRA 511
Facts:
Issue:
Whether or not appellees & action can be entertained, because in
the distribution of all or part of a partnerships assets, all the
partners have no interest and are indispensable parties without
whose intervention no decree of distribution can be validly entered.
Ruling:
It cannot be entertained. A partners share cannot be returned
without first dissolving and liquidating the partnership, for the
return is dependent on the discharge of the creditors, whose claims
preference over those of the partners and it is self-evident that all
members of the partnership are interested in his assets and
business, and are entitled to be heard in the matter of the firms
liquidation and the distribution of its property. The liquidation drawn
by appellant is not signed by the other members of the partnership
besides appellees and appellant; it does not appear that they have
approved, authorized, or ratified the same, and, therefore, it is not
binding upon them. At the very least, they are entitled to be heard
upon its correctness. In addition, unless a proper accounting and
Held:
No. After accepting his shares without any reservation,
respondent virtually confirmed his approval of the statement of
accounts, and its signing thereby became a mere formality to
be complied with by Lasala exclusively. His refusal to sign, after
receiving the shares, amounted to a waiver of that formality in
favor of Ornum who had already performed his obligation. This
approval precludes any right on the part of respondent to a
further liquidation, unless he can show there was fraud or
mistake in said approval.