Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3, MARCH 2005
1137
AbstractThe performance of a wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) optical network can be severely degraded due
to fiber nonlinear effects. In the case where nonzero dispersion
(NZD) fibers are employed, the four-wave mixing (FWM) effect
sets an upper limit on the input power, especially in the case of
narrow channel spacing. In order to reduce FWM-induced distortion two new techniques, the hybrid amplitude-/frequency-shift
keying (ASK/FSK) modulation and the use of prechirped pulses
are investigated. It is shown that both techniques can greatly improve the -factor in a 10 Gb/s WDM system. This happens even
for very high input powers ( 10 dBm), where the degradation of
the conventional WDM system is prohibitively high. The proposed
methods are also applied and tested in higher bit rates (40 Gb/s).
It is deduced that although the hybrid ASK/FSK modulation
technique marginally improves the system performance, the
optical prechirp technique can still be used to greatly increase the
maximum allowable input power of the system.
Index TermsChirp, nonlinear optics, optical crosstalk, optical
fiber communications, wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM).
I. INTRODUCTION
Manuscript received April 7, 2004; revised October 29, 2004. This work was
supported in part by the Hellenic Ministry of Education under a Pythagoras
Grant.
The authors are with the Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of Athens, Athens GR-15784, Greece (e-mail: i.neokosmidis@di.uoa.gr).
Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/JLT.2004.841448
1138
Fig. 1.
System structure.
and
(1)
1139
Fig. 2. An eight-channel system with 50 GHz channel spacing and input peak
power P = 8 dBm is simulated numerically by varying the timing shifts
between the channels randomly.
Fig. 3. Comparison of the SPM, XPM, and FWM effect when P = 10 dBm.
(a) SPM effect, (b) SPM and XPM effects, and (c) SPM, XPM, and FWM
effects.
(7)
and
is the envelope of
where
is the inverse of the group
the channel as above. Also
velocity at the frequency
and
is the GVD parameter at
the same frequency. Note that, in the above system of equaon the righttions, the SPM effect is described by the
hand side of (7) while the XPM effect is described by the sum
. The FWM is not taken into account in (7)
and hence, a comparison between the solutions of (4) and (7)
can be used to estimate the importance of the FWM-induced
distortion in the WDM link.
In order to ascertain that the FWM is indeed the dominant
noise source, the eye diagrams of the central channel are plotted
in Fig. 3 in the cases where (a) only SPM is assumed (i.e., only
the central WDM channel is on), (b) only SPM and XPM are
assumed, and (c) FWM, XPM, and SPM are assumed. An eight10 Gb/s is assumed with
channel WDM system with
a channel spacing of 50 GHz. Observing the eye diagrams of
Fig. 3, it is deduced that the degradation induced by SPM and
XPM is indeed much lower than that of FWM in a WDM link
with NZDF.
The results of Fig. 3 can also be justified theoretically. In [13],
it is shown that the XPM intensity fluctuations depend on the
accumulated dispersion of the span. When dispersion compensation is used, the XPM-induced intensity distortion is greatly
diminished. On the other hand, the FWM-induced intensity distortion rests almost unaffected from dispersion compensation.
1140
sign
(8)
1141
= 10 dBm. The
( ) 2 = 740 ps (solid line)
Fig. 5. (a) The hybrid ASK/FSK WDM system configuration. (b) The power spectral density of a hybrid ASK/FSK modulated signal for P
GHz. (c) Pulse variation p t for t
ASK and FSK modulation rates are 10 and 1 Gb/s, respectively, and the channel detuning is
along with a square FSK pulse ( t
=R
, dashed line) for R
GHz.
2 =1
=1
1=5
the pulse from the central frequency. Hence, to quantify the rate
and consequently the amount of prechirp inof change of
duced at the transmitter, one can simply use the time derivative
[1] of
.
VI. EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPOSED METHODS
Fig. 6. (a) System configuration of the prechirped optical WDM system and
(b) optical pulses at the input and the output of the DCF at the transmitter.
1142
Fig. 7. Eye diagrams for the central channel of a single span eight-channel
WDM system: (a) conventional WDM system, (b) application of the hybrid
ASK/FSK modulation, and (c) WDM with prechirped pulses. The transmission
rate is 10 Gb/s, the channel spacing is 50 GHz, and the input power is 10 dBm.
Fig. 8. Q-factor of the central channel as a function of the input power P for
a 10 Gb/s system of (a) eight channels and 50 GHz channel spacing, (b) eight
channels and 100 GHz channel spacing, (c) 16 channels and 50 GHz channel
spacing, and (d) 16 channels and 100 GHz channel spacing.
Fig. 9.
system.
1143
1144
[5] K. Sekine, N. Kikuchi, S. Sasaki, and H. Ikeda, FWM crosstalk reduction using bit-phase arranged RZ (BARZ) signals in WDM systems, in
Proc. Optoelectronics Communications Conf. (OECC) 96, 1996, Paper
17B2-4, pp. 114115.
[6] A. Okada, V. Curri, S. M. Gemelos, and L. G. Kazovsky, Reduction
of four-wave mixing crosstalk using a novel hybrid WDM/TDM technique, in Proc. Eur. Conf. Optical Communication (ECOC98), 1998,
pp. 289290.
[7] K. Sekine, S. Sasaki, and N. Kikuchi, 10 Gbit/s four-channel wavelength- and polarization-division multiplexing transmission over 340 km
with 0.5 nm channel spacing, Electron. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 4950, 1995.
[8] F. Forghieri, R. Tkach, A. Chraplyvy, and D. Marcuse, Reduction of
four-wave mixing crosstalk in WDM systems using unequally spaced
channels, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 754756, Jun.
1994.
[9] H. Suzuki, S. Ohteru, and N. Takachio, 22 10 Gb/s WDM transmission based on extended method of unequally channel allocation around
the zero-dispersion wavelength region, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.,
vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 16771679, Dec. 1999.
[10] A. Boskovic, S. Ten, and V. L. da Silva, FWM penalty reduction in
dense WDM systems through channel detuning, in Proc. Eur. Conf.
Optical Communications (ECOC98), 1998, pp. 163164.
[11] P. J. Winzer, M. Pfennigbauer, M. M. Strasser, and W. R. Leeb, Optimum filter bandwidths for optically preamplified NRZ recievers, J.
Lightw. Technol., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 12631273, Sep. 2001.
[12] M. K. Smit and C. Dam, PHASAR-based WDM-devices: Principles
and applications, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron., vol. 2, no. 2,
pp. 236250, Jun. 1996.
[13] B. Xu and M. Brandt-Pearce, Comparison of FWM-and XPM-induced
crosstalk using the Volterra series transfer function method, J. Lightw.
Technol., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 4053, Jan. 2003.
[14] S. Kumar, G. Luther, and J. Hurley, Finite-band noise theory and
experiment for four-wave mixing in RZ transmission systems, in
Proc. Optical Fiber Communications Conf. (OFC), vol. 3, 2001, pp.
WW6-1WW6-4.