You are on page 1of 2

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Notices 30377

to access those documents in the docket operations, including the occurrence Estimated Total Annual Cost:
that are available electronically. Once in and duration of any startup, shutdown, $106,662,892, of which $75,300,000
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then or malfunction in the operation of an accounts for annual O&M costs and
key in the docket ID number identified affected facility, or any period during $31,362,892 are labor costs. There are
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is which the monitoring system is no annualized capital/startup costs
that public comments, whether inoperative. The types of reports associated with this ICR.
submitted electronically, or in paper, required by these standards include Changes in the Estimates: There is no
will be made available for public initial compliance status reports. change in the labor hours or cost in this
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, Periodic reports required by this ICR compared to the previous ICR. This
as EPA receives them and without standard include annual compliance is due to two considerations. First, the
change, unless the comment contains status reports for area sources and regulations have not changed over the
copyrighted material, CBI, or other semiannual compliance status reports past three years and are not anticipated
information whose public disclosure is for major sources, unless an exceedance to change over the next three years.
restricted by statute. For further has occurred which requires sources to Second, the growth rate for the industry
information about the electronic docket, submit such reports on a more frequent is very low, so there is no significant
go to www.regulations.gov. basis. These notifications, reports, and change in the overall burden.
Title: NESHAP for Chromium records are essential in determining Because there are no changes in the
Emissions From Hard and Decorative compliance, and are required of all regulatory requirements and there is no
Chromium Electroplating and sources subject to NESHAP standards. significant industry growth, the labor
Chromium Anodizing (Renewal). Any owner, or operator subject to the hours and cost figures in the previous
ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number provisions of this part shall maintain a ICR are used in this ICR to estimate the
1611.06, OMB Control Number 2060– file of these measurements, and retain industry and Federal Government
0327. the file for at least five years following burdens. There is one exception: The
ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to burden associated with regulators
the date of such measurements,
expire on June 30, 2007. Under OMB attending performance tests was deleted
maintenance reports, and records. All
regulations, the Agency may continue to
reports are sent to the delegated state, or because that activity is considered part
conduct, or sponsor the collection of
local authority. In the event that there of the implementation of the
information while this submission is
is no such delegated authority, the enforcement program and cannot be
pending at OMB. An Agency may not
reports are sent directly to the United attributed to this rule.
conduct, or sponsor, and a person is not
States Environmental Protection Agency Dated: May 23, 2007.
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a (EPA) regional office. Sara Hisel-McCoy,
currently valid OMB control number. Burden Statement: The annual public Acting Director; Collection Strategies
The OMB control numbers for EPA’s reporting and recordkeeping burden for Division.
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after this collection of information is [FR Doc. E7–10521 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am]
appearing in the Federal Register when estimated to average 83 hours per
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, response. Burden means the total time,
and displayed either by publication in effort, or financial resources expended
the Federal Register or by other by persons to generate, maintain, retain, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
appropriate means, such as on the or disclose, or provide information to, or AGENCY
related collection instrument or form, if for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions; [FRL–8319–6]
applicable. The display of OMB control
numbers in certain EPA regulations is develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes Reissuance of the NPDES General
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. Permit for Oil and Gas Exploration,
Abstract: The national emission of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and Development and Production Facilities
standards for hazardous air pollutants Located in State and Federal Waters in
(NESHAP) using maximum achievable maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the Cook Inlet (Permit Number AKG–31–
control technology (MACT) for control 5000)
of chromium emissions from hard and existing ways to comply with any
decorative chromium electroplating and previously applicable instructions and AGENCY: Environmental Protection
chromium anodizing tanks were requirements which have subsequently Agency (EPA).
proposed on December 16, 1993 and changed; train personnel to be able to ACTION: Notice of availability of final
promulgated on January 25, 1995. respond to a collection of information; NPDES general permit.
In general, all NESHAP standards search data sources; complete and
require initial notifications, review the collection of information; SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Water
performance tests, and periodic reports. and transmit, or otherwise disclose the and Watersheds, EPA Region 10, is
Respondents that are not required to information. publishing notice of availability of the
conduct an initial performance test (i.e., Respondents/Affected Entities: final National Pollutant Discharge
decorative chromium electroplating, or Operators of hard chromium Elimination System (NPDES) general
chromium anodizing operations that use electroplating, decorative chromium permit authorizing discharges from
a wetting agent and meet the surface electroplating, and chromium anodizing exploration, development, and
tension limit required by the rule, and facilities/chromium electroplating, or production platforms and related
decorative chromium electroplating chromium anodizing tanks. facilities in Cook Inlet, Alaska, pursuant
operations that use a trivalent Estimated Number of Respondents: to the provisions of the Clean Water Act,
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

chromium bath) are required to notify 5,020. 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. The general
the Administrator of the initial Frequency of Response: Initially, permit contains conditions and
compliance status of the source. quarterly, semiannually, annually. limitations that conform to the Offshore
Owners, or operators also are required Total Annual Hour Burden: 495,774 and Coastal Subcategories of the Oil and
to maintain records of a source’s hours. Gas Extraction Point Source Effluent

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:01 May 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM 31MYN1
30378 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Notices

Limitations Guidelines, set forth at 40 washington.audrey@epa.gov or Regulatory Flexibility Act


CFR Part 435, subparts A and D, as well shaw.hanh@epa.gov. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
as additional requirements that ensure 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that EPA
that the regulated discharges will not FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
general permit, Fact Sheet, Response to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
cause unreasonable degradation of the for rules subject to the requirements of
marine environment, as required by Comment document and comment
database may be found on the Region 10 5 U.S.C. 553(b) that have a significant
section 403(c) of the Clean Water Act impact on a substantial number of small
(i.e., the Ocean Discharge Criteria), 33 Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/
r10earth/waterpermits.htm (under entities. However, general NPDES
U.S.C. 1343(c). New facilities seeking permits are not ‘‘rules’’ subject to the
permit coverage must submit a Notice of General Permits, Oil and Gas).
Telephone requests for copies may be requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), and is
Intent (NOI) at least 30 days prior to therefore not subject to the RFA.
discharge. made to Audrey Washington at (206)
The general permit expands the 553–0523 or to Hanh Shaw at (206) 553– Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
existing coverage area to include the 0171.
Section 201 of the Unfunded
Minerals Management Service Lease Other Legal Requirements Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public
Sales Nos. 191 and 199, and the State Law 104–4, generally requires federal
waters adjoining those lease areas. The State Water Quality Standards and
agencies to assess the effects of their
general permit also authorizes State Certification
‘‘regulatory actions’’ (defined to be the
discharges from oil and gas exploration, Pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean same as ‘‘rules’’ subject to the RFA) on
development and production facilities, Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341, on May 18, tribal, state, and local governments and
however, new development and 2007, the Alaska Department of the private sector. However, the general
production facilities are not authorized Environmental Conservation (ADEC) permit issued today is not a ‘‘rule’’
to discharge produced water, drilling certified that the conditions of the subject to the RFA, and is therefore not
fluids, or drill cuttings. A fact sheet has general permit comply with the Alaska subject to the UMRA.
also been prepared which sets forth the State Water Quality Standards (Alaska
principle factual, legal, policy, and Appeal of Permit
Administrative Code 18 AAC 15, 18
scientific information considered in the AAC 70, and 18 AAC 72), including the Any interested person may appeal the
development of the general permit. State’s antidegradation policy. general permit in the Federal Court of
DATES: The NPDES general permit shall Appeals in accordance with section
become effective on July 2, 2007. State of Alaska Coastal Zone 509(b)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33
Public Comment: On April 1, 2004, Management Act U.S.C. 1369(b)(1). This appeal must be
the previous NPDES general permit filed within 120 days of the permit
On May 31, 2006, the Department of
expired. Pursuant to section 402 of the effective date. Persons affected by the
Natural Resources, Office of Project
Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1342, EPA permit may not challenge the conditions
Management and Permitting agreed with
proposed to reissue the general permit of the permit in further EPA
EPA’s consistency determination under
and solicited comments on the draft proceedings (see 40 CFR 124.19).
the Alaska Coastal Zone Management
general permit in the Federal Register Instead, they may either challenge the
Act.
on March 1, 2006. Notice of the draft permit in court or apply for an
general permit was also published in the Endangered Species Act individual NPDES permit.
Anchorage Daily News, the Homer Signed this 21st day of May, 2007.
Tribune, and the Peninsula Clarion. EPA has determined that the issuance
of the general permit is not likely to Michael F. Gearheard,
There was an initial 60 day public
adversely affect any threatened or Director, Office of Water and Watersheds,
comment period which EPA extended Region 10.
for an additional 30 days. Thus, the endangered species, designated critical
habitat, or essential fish habitat. The [FR Doc. E7–10456 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am]
entire public comment period extended
90 days. Public hearings were held in National Marine Fisheries Service BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

Anchorage, Homer, and Kenai/Soldotna. (NMFS) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
The comment period ended on May 31, Service (USFWS) concurred with EPA’s
2006. determination. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Changes have been made from the Executive Order 12866 Notice of Agreements Filed
draft permit to the final permit in
response to comments received from EPA has determined that this general The Commission hereby gives notice
Tribal representatives, environmental permit is not a ‘‘significant regulatory of the filing of the following agreements
advocacy groups, industry action’’ under the terms of Executive under the Shipping Act of 1984.
representatives, government agencies, Order 12866 and is therefore not subject Interested parties may submit comments
trade organizations, and individual to Office of Management and Budget on agreements to the Secretary, Federal
citizens. All comments, along with (OMB) review. Maritime Commission, Washington, DC
EPA’s responses, are summarized in the 20573, within ten days of the date this
Paperwork Reduction Act
Response to Comment document and notice appears in the Federal Register.
comment database. The information collection Copies of agreements are available
ADDRESSES: Copies of the general requirements of this general permit were through the Commission’s Office of
permit, the Response to Comment previously approved by the OMB under Agreements (202–523–5793 or
document and comment database are the provisions of the Paperwork tradeanalysis@fmc.gov).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES

available upon request. Written requests Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Agreement No.: 010979–044.
may be submitted to EPA Region 10, and assigned OMB control numbers Title: Caribbean Shipowners
1200 Sixth Avenue OWW–130, Seattle, 2040–0086 (NPDES permit application) Association.
WA 98101. Electronic requests may be and 2040–0004 (discharge monitoring Parties: Bernuth Lines, Ltd.; CMA
e-mailed to: reports). CGM, S.A.; Crowley Liner Services, Inc.;

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:01 May 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\31MYN1.SGM 31MYN1

You might also like