Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/227008462
CITATIONS
14 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Alberto Passerone
Enrica Ricci
17 PUBLICATIONS 72 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Seshadri Seetharaman
B. Vinet
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
R. Wunderlich, R. Aune, L. Battezati, R. Brooks et al: Surface Tension and Viscosity of Industrial Alloy - the ThermoLab Project
Ragnhild Aune1, Livio Battezzati2, Rob Brooks3, Ivan Egry4, Hans-Jrg Fecht5, Jean-Paul
Garandet6, Ken C. Mills7, Alberto Passerone8, Peter N. Quested3, Enrica Ricci8, Stephan
Schneider4, Seshadri Seetharaman1, Rainer K. Wunderlich5, Bernard Vinet6
Authors:
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
Mail Address:
Rainer K. Wunderlich, Materials Division, University of Ulm,
Albert-Einstein-Allee 47, 89081 Ulm, Germany
INTRODUCTION
The numerical simulation of casting and microstructure formation is used increasingly by industry [1] for the optimization of
casting and the improvement of product quality. Models
describing fluid and heat flow are combined with thermodynamic models of nucleation and growth kinetics, phase selection, and phase stability in the solid phase [2]. The increasing
sophistication of numerical simulation is, however, met by a
pronounced lack of thermophysical property data which is owed
to the high chemical reactivity of many metallic alloys in the
liquid phase. As a consequence, for many high-temperature
alloys conventional thermoanalytical techniques where the
specimen is in contact with a container are difficult to apply and
fraught with error. In order to overcome these limitations, containerless methods for thermophysical property measurements
have been developed and applied under reduced-gravity conditions [3, 4].
Knowledge of the surface tension is relevant for the prediction of defects such as gas porosity, the contribution of
Marangoni convection to fluid transport, and for an estimate of
the effect of liquid - mould interaction. The viscosity is relevant
for the calculation of the convective contribution to heat transfer, for simulations of mould filling and, in general, for all
processes involving moving fluid. The experiments to be
described were conducted within the framework of the
ThermoLab project which was initiated to provide thermophysical property values of industrial alloys by the application of
containerless processing under reduced gravity conditions and
in ground-based laboratory including also conventional techniques.
EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
The alloy selection was mainly driven by the industrial user
group of the ThermoLab project. While for the Ni-based alloys
measurements of the surface tension and of the viscosity could
also be performed by the sessile drop and the oscillating cup
method in ground-based laboratory, this was not possible for the
11
R. Wunderlich, R. Aune, L. Battezati, R. Brooks et al: Surface Tension and Viscosity of Industrial Alloy - the ThermoLab Project
Alloy
T1 / C
Flight
Ti6Al4V
1655
Oct 2001
Ti 6242
1705
Oct. 2002
-TiAl
1566
June 2003
CMSX-4
1382
Oct. 2002
IN738LC
1345
June 2003
MM247LC
1368
June 2003
C263
1355
June 2003
1480
June 2003
cast iron
1367
June 2003
12
3/8
2
Microgravity sci. technol. XVI-1 (2005)
R. Wunderlich, R. Aune, L. Battezati, R. Brooks et al: Surface Tension and Viscosity of Industrial Alloy - the ThermoLab Project
3/(20) (/R) 1
d/dT
Source
IN738LC
1.85
-1.48 10-3
PF June 2003
MM247LC
1.86
-1.36 10-3
PF June 2003
C263
1.74
-0.69 10-3
PF June 2003
1.78
-1.28 10-3
PF Oct. 2002
1.75
-1.80 10
-3
PF Oct. 2002
CMSX-4
1.97
-1.38 10
-3
CMSX-4
1.83
-1.45 10
-3
Alloy
Table 2. Surface tension at Tl and temperature coefficient of Nibased superalloys. The two bottom rows show values obtained in the
ground-based programme.
RESULTS
Ni-based superalloys
As a typical result for the Ni-based superalloys, the surface tension as a function of temperature of the alloy MM247LC is
shown in Figure 5. The data exhibit low scatter and can be very
well fit by a linear regression. The results were compiled from
4 parabolas. In Table 2, a compilation of the surface tension of
the Ni-based superalloys obtained on the parabolic flights is
shown. For CMSX-4, very good agreement of (Tl) and d/dT
Fig.2a. High frequency component of the temperature signal shown on the left hand side; 2b. Fourier spectrum of a 0.64 s time slice
13
R. Wunderlich, R. Aune, L. Battezati, R. Brooks et al: Surface Tension and Viscosity of Industrial Alloy - the ThermoLab Project
(T1)/ Nm-1
d/dT
Ti6Al4V
1.52
-5.52 10-4
PF Nov. 2001
Ti6Al4V
1.49
-4.10 10
-4
PF Oct. 2002
Ti6Al4V
1.52
-4.50 10
-3
PF Oct. 2002
Ti-6-242
1.51
-8.73 10
PF Oct. 2002
Ti6Al4V
1.52
n.a
Alloy
Source
-3
T / C
h / mPa.s
Ti64
3.92
Ti64
1670 +/- 80
4.82
Ti6242
3.70
Ti6242
1626 +/- 80
4.76
) and high
14
Ti-alloys
As an example of the quality of the data obtained in the parabolic flights for the Ti-alloys the surface tension as a function of
temperature of Ti6Al4V is shown in Figure 5. Very good agreement with a value obtained by the pendant drop technique at the
liquidus temperature, i.e., (Tl) = 1.52 Nm-1, was obtained giving support to the results of the parabolic flights where no comparison values over a large range in temperature are available
from other techniques. Moreover, a reproducibility of the surface tension at Tl of better 1 % was obtained in data obtained
from two different parabolic flights and with specimen of different diameter as shown in Table 3. Viscosity values for the TiAl-V alloys obtained on the parabolic flights are given in Table
4.
CONCLUSIONS
Parabolic flights were proved as a valuable tool for the measurement of the surface tension and the viscosity of high melting
point industrial alloys. Measurements are carried out almost
routinely and a large amount of property values has been
acquired. A very good reproducibility of surface tension values
for Ti-alloys were obtained on different parabolic flights. It
could be shown that electromagnetic processing conditions had
no effect on the surface tension values. Further improvements
may be expected from an optimization of the temperature-time
profiles for viscosity measurements which will, however,
require a larger number of parabolas to cover the same temperature range as for the surface tension measurements.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the European Space Agency (ESA)
Microgravity Applications Support Programme (MAP) under
contract number AO-99-022 (14306/01/NL/SH) and by the
German Aerospace Center (DLR) under contract number 50
WM 0041. The parabolic flight opportunities were provided by
DLR and ESA. Support from the facility developer EADS
Space Systems and the Microgravity User Support Center at
DLR Cologne is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] Dantzig, J. A.: Solidification Modeling: Status and Outlook, JOM, vol. 52,
no. 12, p. 18 (2000).
[2] Saunders, N., in: Superalloys 1996. Kissenger, R. D. et al. (Eds.), TMS,
Warrendale, Pennsylvania, p. 101 (1996).
[3] Egry, I., Lohfer, G., Jacobs, G.: Surface Tension of Liquid Metals:
Results from Measurements on Ground and in Space, Phys. Rev. Letters,
vol. 75, p. 4043 (1995).
[4] Wunderlich, R. K., Fecht, H.-J.: Thermophysical Properties of Bulk
Metallic Glass Forming Alloys in the Stable and Undercooled Liquid
A Microgravity Investigation, J. Mat. Trans. JIM, vol. 42, no. 4, p. 565
(2001).
[5] Egry, I., Jacobs, G., Schwartz, E., Szekely, J.: Surface Tension
Measurements of Metallic Melts under Micro-Gravity, Int. J.
Thermophys., vol. 17, p. 1181 (1996).
[6] Rsner-Kuhn, M., Hofmeister, W. H., Kuppermann, G., Morton, C. W.,
Bayuzick, R. J., Frohberg, M. G., in: Solidification 1999. Hofmeister, W.
H., Rogers, J. R., Marsh, S., Singh, N. B., Vorhees, P. W. (Eds.), TMS,
Warrendale, Pennsylvania, p. 33 (1999).