Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of the Applicant specified in the Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois our July 1, 2004, preamble starting at 69
particular application. 60604, (312) 353–8777, FR 40038, and we used the information
o. Agency Comments—Federal, state, Maietta.anthony@epa.gov. in these resources while making our
and local agencies are invited to file SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: adequacy determination. Please note
comments on the described application. Throughout this document, whenever that an adequacy review is separate
A copy of the application may be ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean from EPA’s completeness review, and it
obtained by agencies directly from the EPA. also should not be used to prejudge
Applicant. If an agency does not file EPA’s ultimate approval of the SIP.
comments within the time specified for Background Even if we find a budget adequate, the
filling comments, it will be assumed to Today’s notice is simply an SIP could later be disapproved.
have no comments. One copy of an announcement of a finding that we have The finding and the response to
agency’s comments must also be sent to already made. On April 5, 2007, EPA comments are available at EPA’s
the Applicant’s representatives. Region 5 sent a letter to the Ohio transportation conformity Web site:
Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/otaq/
Kimberly D. Bose,
stating that the 2009 and 2018 MVEBs stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
Secretary.
for the Columbus and Toledo areas, Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671 q.
[FR Doc. E7–8216 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am]
which were submitted with the 8-hour Dated: April 19, 2007.
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ozone redesignation request and
Bharat Mathur,
maintenance plans, are adequate.
Receipt of these MVEBs was announced Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION on EPA’s transportation conformity [FR Doc. E7–8278 Filed 4–30–07; 8:45 am]
AGENCY website, and no comments were BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Anthony Maietta, Life Scientist, Criteria budgets are adequate for transportation comments.
Pollutant Section (AR–18J), Air conformity purposes are outlined in 40 • E-mail: Send comments by
Programs Branch, Air and Radiation CFR 93.118(e)(4). We have described electronic mail (e-mail) to:
Division, United States Environmental our process for determining the ORD.Docket@epa.gov, Attention Docket
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in ID No. EPA–HQ–ORD–2007–0363.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:32 Apr 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1